The minor receptor group of human rhinovirus (HRV) includes HRV23 and HRV25, but the presence of a lysine in the VP1 HI loop is not sufficient for receptor binding

Like all 10 minor receptor group human rhinoviruses (HRVs), HRV23 and HRV25, previously classified as major group viruses, are neutralized by maltose binding protein (MBP)-V33333 (a soluble recombinant concatemer of five copies of repeat 3 of the very-low-density lipoprotein receptor fused to MBP), bind to low-density lipoprotein receptor in virus overlay blots, and replicate in intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1)-negative COS-7 cells. From phylogenetic analysis of capsid protein VP1-coding sequences, they are also known to cluster together with other minor group strains. Therefore, they belong to the minor group; there are now 12 minor group and 87 major group HRV serotypes. Sequence comparison of the VP1 capsid proteins of all HRVs revealed that the lysine in the HI loop, strictly conserved in the 12 minor group HRVs, is also present in 9 major group serotypes that are neutralized by soluble ICAM-1. Despite the presence of this lysine, they are not neutralized by MBP-V33333 and fail to replicate in COS-7 cells and in HeLa cells in the presence of an ICAM-1-blocking antibody. These nine serotypes are therefore "true" major group viruses.     

Sequence and structure of human rhinoviruses reveal the basis of receptor discrimination

The sequences of the capsid protein VP1 of all minor receptor group human rhinoviruses were determined. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that minor group HRVs were not more related to each other than to the nine major group HRVs whose sequences are known. Examination of the surface exposed amino acid residues of HRV1A and HRV2, whose X-ray structures are available, and that of three-dimensional models computed for the remaining eight minor group HRVs indicated a pattern of positively charged residues within the region, which, in HRV2, was shown to be the binding site of the very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor. A lysine in the HI loop of VP1 (K224 in HRV2) is strictly conserved within the minor group. It lies in the middle of the footprint of a single repeat of the VLDL receptor on HRV2. Major group virus serotypes exhibit mostly negative charges at the corresponding positions and do not bind the negatively charged VLDL receptor, presumably because of charge repulsion.     

The cellular receptor to human rhinovirus 2 binds around the 5-fold axis and not in the canyon: a structural view

Human rhinovirus serotype 2 (HRV2) belongs to the minor group of HRVs that bind to members of the LDL-receptor family including the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-receptor (VLDL-R). We have determined the structures of the complex between HRV2 and soluble fragments of the VLDL-R to 15 A resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The receptor fragments, which include the first three ligand-binding repeats of the VLDL-R (V1-3), bind to the small star-shaped dome on the icosahedral 5-fold axis. This is in sharp contrast to the major group of HRVs where the receptor site for ICAM-1 is located at the base of a depression around each 5-fold axis. Homology models of the three domains of V1-3 were used to explore the virus-receptor interaction. The footprint of VLDL-R on the viral surface covers the BC- and HI-loops on VP1.     

A mutation in the first ligand-binding repeat of the human very-low-density lipoprotein receptor results in high-affinity binding of the single V1 module to human rhinovirus 2

Minor group human rhinoviruses (HRVs) bind members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family for cell entry. The ligand-binding domains of these membrane proteins are composed of various numbers of direct repeats of about 40 amino acids in length. Residues involved in binding of module 3 (V3) of the very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) to HRV2 have been identified by X-ray crystallography (N. Verdaguer, I. Fita, M. Reithmayer, R. Moser, and D. Blaas, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:429-434, 2004). Sequence comparisons of the eight repeats of VLDLR with respect to the residues implicated in the interaction between V3 and HRV2 suggested that (in addition to V3) V1, V2, V5, and V6 also fulfill the requirements for interacting with the virus. Using a highly sensitive binding assay employing phage display, we demonstrate that single modules V2, V3, and V5 indeed bind HRV2. However, V1 does not. A single mutation from threonine 17 to proline converted the nonbinding wild-type form of V1 into a very strong binder. We interpret the dramatic increase in affinity by the generation of a hydrophobic patch between virus and receptor; in the presence of threonine, the contact area might be disturbed. This demonstrates that the interaction between virus and its natural receptors can be strongly enhanced by mutation.     

Major and Minor Receptor Group Human Rhinoviruses Penetrate from Endosomes by Different Mechanisms

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and the low-density lipoprotein receptor are used for cell entry by major and minor receptor group human rhinoviruses (HRVs), respectively. Whereas minor-group viruses, exemplified by HRV2, transfer their genomic RNA to the cytoplasm through a pore in the endosomal membrane (E. Prchla, C. Plank, E. Wagner, D. Blaas, and R. Fuchs, J. Cell Biol. 131:111–123, 1995), the mechanism of in vivo uncoating of major-group HRVs has not been elucidated so far. Using free-flow electrophoresis, we performed a comparative analysis of cell entry by HRV2 and the major group rhinovirus HRV14. Here we demonstrate that this technique allows the separation of free viral particles from those associated with early endosomes, late endosomes, and plasma membranes. Upon free-flow electrophoretic separation of microsomes, HRV14 was recovered from endosomes under conditions which prevent uncoating, whereas the proportion of free viral particles increased with time under conditions which promote uncoating. The remaining virus eluted within numerous fractions corresponding to membraneous material, with no clear endosomal peaks being discernible. This suggests that uncoating of HRV14 results in lysis of the endosomal membrane and release of subviral 135S and 80S particles into the cytoplasm.     

Identification of the human rhinovirus serotype 1A binding site on the murine low-density lipoprotein receptor by using human-mouse receptor chimeras

Human rhinovirus serotype 1A (HRV1A) binds more strongly to the mouse low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) than to the human homologue (M. Reithmayer, A. Reischl, L. Snyers, and D. Blaas, J. Virol. 76:6957-6965, 2002). Here, we used this fact to determine the binding site of HRV1A by replacing selected ligand binding modules of the human receptor with the corresponding ligand binding modules of the mouse receptor. The chimeric proteins were expressed in mouse fibroblasts deficient in endogenous LDLR and LDLR-related protein, both used by minor group HRVs for cell entry. Binding was assessed by virus overlay blots, by immunofluorescence microscopy, and by measuring cell attachment of radiolabeled virus. Replacement of ligand binding repeat 5 of the human LDLR with the corresponding mouse sequence resulted in a substantial increase in HRV1A binding, whereas substitution of repeats 3 and 4 was without effect. Replacement of human receptor repeats 1 and 2 with the murine homologues also increased virus binding. Finally, murine receptor modules 1, 2, and 5 simultaneously introduced into the human receptor resulted in HRV1A binding indistinguishable from mouse wild-type receptor. Thus, repeats 1 and/or 2 and repeat 5 are involved in HRV1A attachment. Changing CDGGPD in the acidic cluster of module 5 in the human receptor to CDGEAD present in the mouse receptor led to substantially increased binding of HRV1A, indicating an important role of the glutamate residue in HRV1A recognition.     

X-ray structure of a minor group human rhinovirus bound to a fragment of its cellular receptor protein

Although many viral receptors have been identified, the ways in which they interact with their cognate viruses are not understood at the molecular level. We have determined the X-ray structure of a complex between calcium-containing modules of the very low-density lipoprotein receptor and the minor group human rhinovirus HRV2. The receptor binds close to the icosahedral five-fold vertex, with only one module per virus protomer. The binding face of this module is defined by acidic calcium-chelating residues and, in particular, by an exposed tryptophan that is highly conserved. The attachment site on the virus involves only residues from VP1, particularly a lysine strictly conserved in all minor group HRVs. The disposition of the attached ligand-binding repeats around the five-fold axis, together with the proximity of the N- and C-terminal ends of adjacent modules, suggests that more than one repeat in a single receptor molecule might attach simultaneously.     

Attachment of VLDL receptors to an icosahedral virus along the 5-fold symmetry axis: multiple binding modes evidenced by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are composed of 60 identical subunits, each comprising one copy of the viral capsid proteins VP1, 2, 3, and 4. Consequently, 60 symmetry-related epitopes are available for binding of antibodies or receptors. The minor receptor group of HRVs uses members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family for cell entry. The ligand binding domains of these receptors are composed of various numbers of ligand binding repeats, and several of these modules within a single molecule are believed to attach simultaneously to the star-shaped dome at the 5-fold symmetry axis of the virus. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), we have now determined the equilibrium binding constants and the mode of attachment of recombinant concatemers of ligand binding module 3 of the human very-low-density lipoprotein receptor to HRV2. We demonstrate that the avidity of the interaction drastically increases with the number of concatenated modules. For the trimer, the binding isotherm was biphasic, indicating that attachment of two and of three modules within the same molecule was resolved. The receptor consisting of seven repeats was found to bind most strongly, but a complete binding isotherm could not be established due to cross-linking of virions. The values of the dissociation constants were about 1 order of magnitude higher than those previously determined by using surface plasmon resonance techniques reflecting the different presentation of the binding partners. As compared to the concatemers, the natural receptors are composed of similar but not identical repeats; thus, cooperativity and different specificity of the ligand-binding modules allow for recognition of many ligands and viral serotypes. Due to the low concentrations and amounts of sample required, FCS is ideally suited for the determination of receptor binding parameters of viruses difficult to produce in high quantities and/or concentrations.     

Predictive bioinformatic identification of minor receptor group human rhinoviruses

Major group HRVs bind intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and minor group HRVs bind members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family for cell entry. Whereas the former share common sequence motives in their viral capsid proteins (VPs), in the latter only a lysine residue within the binding epitope in VP1 is conserved; this lysine is also present in “K-type” major group HRVs that fail to use LDLR for infection. By using the available sequences three-dimensional models of VP1 of all HRVs were built and binding energies, with respect to module 3 of the very-low-density lipoprotein receptor, were calculated. Based on the predicted affinities K-type HRVs and minor group HRVs were correctly classified.     

Cryoelectron microscopy analysis of the structural changes associated with human rhinovirus type 14 uncoating

Release of the human rhinovirus (HRV) genome into the cytoplasm of the cell involves a concerted structural modification of the viral capsid. The intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) cellular receptor of the major-group HRVs and the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor of the minor-group HRVs have different nonoverlapping binding sites. While ICAM-1 binding catalyzes uncoating, LDL receptor binding does not. Uncoating of minor-group HRVs is initiated by the low pH of late endosomes. We have studied the conformational changes concomitant with uncoating in the major-group HRV14 and compared them with previous results for the minor-group HRV2. The structure of empty HRV14 was determined by cryoelectron microscopy, and the atomic structure of native HRV14 was used to examine the conformational changes of the capsid and its constituent viral proteins. For both HRV2 and HRV14, the transformation from full to empty capsid involves an overall 4% expansion and an iris type of movement of viral protein VP1 to open up a 10-A-diameter channel on the fivefold axis to allow exit of the RNA genome. The beta-cylinders formed by the N termini of the VP3 molecules inside the capsid on the fivefold axis all open up in HRV2, but we propose that only one opens up in HRV14. The release of VP4 is less efficient in HRV14 than in HRV2, and the N termini of VP1 may exit at different points. The N-terminal loop of VP2 is modified in both viruses, probably to detach the RNA, but it bends only inwards in HRV2.     

Absence of the Kilifi mutation in the rhinovirus-binding domain of ICAM-1 in a Caucasian population

Human rhinoviruses (HRV), responsible for approximately 60% of the common colds, are divided into two groups, according to their receptor specificity. The major group of HRVs gains access to human cells by binding to the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), whereas HRVs of the minor group use members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family for cell entry. Previous studies confirmed that the HRV-binding region of ICAM-1 is located in the amino-terminal immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domain 1, which is encoded by exon 2 of the ICAM-1 gene. An A --> T transversion in codon 29 of ICAM-1 exon 2 causes a lysine to methionine substitution (K29M), and was found at a high frequency (33.2%) in Kilifi (Kenya), as well as in other African populations. In this study we examined whether polymorphisms in exon 2 of ICAM-1 could be detected in a Caucasian population, assuming that these could be of importance in HRV binding. DNA from 100 healthy, unrelated, Belgian volunteers was obtained through a noninvasive swish-and-spit method. Using a primer set in the adjacent intron sequences, the full-length ICAM-1 exon 2 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by direct sequencing of the PCR product. No polymorphisms could be demonstrated in exon 2 of the ICAM-1 gene among all 100 tested individuals. The rhinovirus-binding Ig domain 1 of ICAM-1 seems to be a highly conserved region in the Caucasian population.     

Viral evolution toward change in receptor usage: adaptation of a major group human rhinovirus to grow in ICAM-1-negative cells

Major receptor group common cold virus HRV89 was adapted to grow in HEp-2 cells, which are permissive for minor group human rhinoviruses (HRVs) but which only marginally support growth of major-group viruses. After 32 blind passages in these cells, each alternating with boosts of the recovered virus in HeLa cells, HRV89 acquired the capacity to effectively replicate in HEp-2 cells, attaining virus titers comparable to those in HeLa cells although no cytopathic effect was observed. Several clones were isolated and shown to replicate in HeLa cells whose ICAM-1 was blocked with monoclonal antibody R6.5 and in COS-7 cells, which are devoid of ICAM-1. Blocking experiments with recombinant very-low-density lipoprotein receptor fragments and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays indicated that the mutants bound a receptor different from that used by minor-group viruses. Determination of the genomic RNA sequence encoding the capsid protein region revealed no changes in amino acid residues at positions equivalent to those involved in the interaction of HRV14 or HRV16 with ICAM-1. One mutation was within the footprint of a very-low-density lipoprotein receptor fragment bound to minor-group virus HRV2. Since ICAM-1 not only functions as a vehicle for cell entry but has also a "catalytic" function in uncoating, the use of other receptors must have important consequences for the entry pathway and demonstrates the plasticity of these viruses.     

Human Rhinovirus Induced Cytokine/Chemokine Responses in Human Airway Epithelial and Immune Cells

Infections with human rhinovirus (HRV) are commonly associated with acute upper and lower respiratory tract disease and asthma exacerbations. The role that HRVs play in these diseases suggests it is important to understand host-specific or virus-specific factors that contribute to pathogenesis. Since species A HRVs are often associated with more serious HRV disease than species B HRVs, differences in immune responses they induce should inform disease pathogenesis. To identify species differences in induced responses, we evaluated 3 species A viruses, HRV 25, 31 and 36 and 3 species B viruses, HRV 4, 35 and 48 by exposing human PBMCs to HRV infected Calu-3 cells. To evaluate the potential effect of memory induced by previous HRV infection on study responses, we tested cord blood mononuclear cells that should be HRV naïve. There were HRV-associated increases (significant increase compared to mock-infected cells) for one or more HRVs for IP-10 and IL-15 that was unaffected by addition of PBMCs, for MIP-1α, MIP-1β, IFN-α, and HGF only with addition of PBMCs, and for ENA-78 only without addition of PBMCs. All three species B HRVs induced higher levels, compared to A HRVs, of MIP-1α and MIP-1β with PBMCs and ENA-78 without PBMCs. In contrast, addition of CBMCs had less effect and did not induce MIP-1α, MIP-1β, or IFN-α nor block ENA-78 production. Addition of CBMCs did, however, increase IP-10 levels for HRV 35 and HRV 36 infection. The presence of an effect with PBMCs and no effect with CBMCs for some responses suggest differences between the two types of cells possibly because of the presence of HRV memory responses in PBMCs and not CBMCs or limited response capacity for the immature CBMCs relative to PBMCs. Thus, our results indicate that different HRV strains can induce different patterns of cytokines and chemokines; some of these differences may be due to differences in memory responses induced by past HRV infections, and other differences related to virus factors that can inform disease pathogenesis.     

Human rhinovirus type 54 infection via heparan sulfate is less efficient and strictly dependent on low endosomal pH

K-type major-group human rhinoviruses (HRVs) (including HRV54) share a prominent lysine residue in the HI surface loop of VP1 with all minor-group HRVs. Despite the presence of this residue, they cannot use members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family for productive infection. Reexamining all K-type viruses for receptor usage, we noticed that HRV54 is able to replicate in RD cells that lack the major-group receptor intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1). By using receptor blocking assays, inhibition of sulfation, enzymatic digestion, and proteoglycan-deficient cell lines, we show here that wild-type HRV54, without any adaptation, uses heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycan as an alternate receptor. However, infection via HS is less efficient than infection via ICAM-1. Moreover, HRV54 has an acid lability profile similar to that of the minor-group virus HRV2. In ICAM-1-deficient cells its replication is completely blocked by the H(+)-ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1, whereas in ICAM-1-expressing cells it replicates in the presence of the drug. Thus, use of a "noncatalytic" receptor requires the virus to be highly unstable at low pH.     

Human Rhinovirus 14 Enters Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells Expressing ICAM-1 by a Clathrin-, Caveolin-, and Flotillin-Independent Pathway

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) mediates binding and entry of major group human rhinoviruses (HRVs). Whereas the entry pathway of minor group HRVs has been studied in detail and is comparatively well understood, the pathway taken by major group HRVs is largely unknown. Use of immunofluorescence microscopy, colocalization with specific endocytic markers, dominant negative mutants, and pharmacological inhibitors allowed us to demonstrate that the major group virus HRV14 enters rhabdomyosarcoma cells transfected to express human ICAM-1 in a clathrin-, caveolin-, and flotillin-independent manner. Electron microscopy revealed that many virions accumulated in long tubular structures, easily distinguishable from clathrin-coated pits and caveolae. Virus entry was strongly sensitive to the Na⁺/H⁺ ion exchange inhibitor amiloride and moderately sensitive to cytochalasin D. Thus, cellular uptake of HRV14 occurs via a pathway exhibiting some, but not all, characteristics of macropinocytosis and is similar to that recently described for adenovirus 3 entry via α_v integrin/CD46 in HeLa cells.Human rhinoviruses (HRVs), members of the family Picornaviridae that represent a major cause of the common cold, essentially utilize two different receptor types for host cell attachment. The 12 minor group HRVs, exemplified by HRV2, bind low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), LDLR-related protein (LRP) (20), and very-LDLR (VLDLR) (29) and are internalized via the well-characterized clathrin-dependent endocytic pathway (44); however, these ligands, like others, can switch to different entry portals when the clathrin-dependent pathway is blocked (4). Once the virus arrives in endosomal carrier vesicles or late endosomes, uncoating (i.e., the release of the viral RNA genome) is triggered by the acidic pH (35, 39).The 87 major group HRVs, exemplified by HRV14, bind intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Following entry, uncoating is triggered by ICAM-1 itself (3), but the low endosomal pH facilitates this process (37). Based on inhibition of infection by the dominant negative (DN) dynamin-2 mutant dyn^K44A, it was proposed that HRV14 also follows a clathrin-dependent pathway in HeLa-H1 cells (9). However, ICAM-1 lacks a clathrin localization signal and even functions as a viral receptor when its cytoplasmic tail is replaced with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (45). Furthermore, dynamin has also been shown to be involved in pathways other than clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), such as caveolae- and lipid raft-dependent entry, as a function of ligand and cell type (reviewed in references 30 and 34). Additionally, dynamin might play a role in formation and closure of circular pinocytic ruffles (31). More recently, a specific entry pathway for ICAM-1 ligands into human umbilical vein endothelial cells was identified and termed “cam-mediated endocytosis”; uptake was found to be triggered upon binding of multivalent ligands, such as immunoconjugates and immunobeads, and to occur independently from clathrin and caveolin. Inhibition by amiloride, actin depolymerization, and protein kinase C inhibitors pointed to macropinocytosis (33). So far, it is not known whether these findings are relevant to the entry pathway of HRVs via ICAM-1 as the uptake kinetics was significantly dependent on particle size. For all these reasons, involvement of clathrin in HRV14 uptake is questionable. Accordingly, we explored entry of HRV14 via ICAM-1 and compared the results with the well-characterized clathrin-dependent entry pathway of HRV2 (44). Employing pharmacological compounds, specific DN inhibitors, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy, we demonstrate that HRV14 enters rhabdomyosarcoma ICAM-1-expressing (RD-ICAM) cells via a pathway independent of clathrin, caveolin, and flotillin.     

Optimization of capsid-incorporated antigens for a novel adenovirus vaccine approach

Background

Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are the predominant cause of common cold. In addition, HRVs are implicated in the worsening of COPD and asthma, as well as the loss of lung transplants. Despite significant efforts, no anti-viral agent is approved for the prevention or treatment of HRV-infection.

Results

In this study we demonstrate that Iota-Carrageenan, a sulphated polysaccharide derived from red seaweed, is a potent anti-rhinoviral substance in-vitro. Iota-Carrageenan reduces HRV growth and inhibits the virus induced cythopathic effect of infected HeLa cells. In addition, Iota-Carrageenan effectively prevents the replication of HRV1A, HRV2, HRV8, HRV14, HRV16, HRV83 and HRV84 in primary human nasal epithelial cells in culture. The data suggest that Iota-Carrageenan acts primarily by preventing the binding or the entry of virions into the cells.

Conclusion

Since HRV infections predominately occur in the nasal cavity and the upper respiratory tract, a targeted treatment with a product containing Iota-Carrageenan is conceivable. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether Iota-Carrageenan-based products are effective in the treatment or prophylaxis of HRV infections.     

Distinguishing molecular features and clinical characteristics of a putative new rhinovirus species, human rhinovirus C (HRV C)

Background

Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) are the most frequently detected pathogens in acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) and yet little is known about the prevalence, recurrence, structure and clinical impact of individual members. During 2007, the complete coding sequences of six previously unknown and highly divergent HRV strains were reported. To catalogue the molecular and clinical features distinguishing the divergent HRV strains, we undertook, for the first time, in silico analyses of all available polyprotein sequences and performed retrospective reviews of the medical records of cases in which variants of the prototype strain, HRV-QPM, had been detected.

Methodology/Principle Findings

Genomic analyses revealed that the six divergent strains, residing within a clade we previously called HRV A2, had the shortest polyprotein of all picornaviruses investigated. Structure-based amino acid alignments identified conserved motifs shared among members of the genus Rhinovirus as well as substantive deletions and insertions unique to the divergent strains. Deletions mostly affected regions encoding proteins traditionally involved in antigenicity and serving as HRV and HEV receptor footprints. Because the HRV A2 strains cannot yet be cultured, we created homology models of predicted HRV-QPM structural proteins. In silico comparisons confirmed that HRV-QPM was most closely related to the major group HRVs. HRV-QPM was most frequently detected in infants with expiratory wheezing or persistent cough who had been admitted to hospital and required supplemental oxygen. It was the only virus detected in 65% of positive individuals. These observations contributed to an objective clinical impact ranging from mild to severe.

Conclusions

The divergent strains did not meet classification requirements for any existing species of the genus Rhinovirus or Enterovirus. HRV A2 strains should be partitioned into at least one new species, putatively called Human rhinovirus C, populated by members detected with high frequency, from individuals with respiratory symptoms requiring hospital admission.     

Group A human rotavirus genomics: evidence that gene constellations are influenced by viral protein interactions

Group A human rotaviruses (HRVs) are the major cause of severe viral gastroenteritis in infants and young children. To gain insight into the level of genetic variation among HRVs, we determined the genome sequences for 10 strains belonging to different VP7 serotypes (G types). The HRVs chosen for this study, D, DS-1, P, ST3, IAL28, Se584, 69M, WI61, A64, and L26, were isolated from infected persons and adapted to cell culture to use as serotype references. Our sequencing results revealed that most of the individual proteins from each HRV belong to one of three genotypes (1, 2, or 3) based on their similarities to proteins of genogroup strains (Wa, DS-1, or AU-1, respectively). Strains D, P, ST3, IAL28, and WI61 encode genotype 1 (Wa-like) proteins, whereas strains DS-1 and 69M encode genotype 2 (DS-1-like) proteins. Of the 10 HRVs sequenced, 3 of them (Se584, A64, and L26) encode proteins belonging to more than one genotype, indicating that they are intergenogroup reassortants. We used amino acid sequence alignments to identify residues that distinguish proteins belonging to HRV genotype 1, 2, or 3. These genotype-specific changes cluster in definitive regions within each viral protein, many of which are sites of known protein-protein interactions. For the intermediate viral capsid protein (VP6), the changes map onto the atomic structure at the VP2-VP6, VP4-VP6, and VP7-VP6 interfaces. The results of this study provide evidence that group A HRV gene constellations exist and may be influenced by interactions among viral proteins during replication.     

A cellular receptor of human rhinovirus type 2, the very-low-density lipoprotein receptor,binds to two neighboring proteins of the viral capsid

The very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDL-R) is a receptor for the minor-group human rhinoviruses (HRVs). Only two of the eight binding repeats of the VLDL-R bind to HRV2, and their footprints describe an annulus on the dome at each fivefold axis. By studying the complex formed between a selection of soluble fragments of the VLDL-R and HRV2, we demonstrate that it is the second and third repeats that bind. We also show that artificial concatemers of the same repeat can bind to HRV2 with the same footprint as that for the native receptor. In a 16-A-resolution cryoelectron microscopy map of HRV2 in complex with the VLDL-R, the individual repeats are defined. The third repeat is strongly bound to charged and polar residues of the HI and BC loops of viral protein 1 (VP1), while the second repeat is more weakly bound to the neighboring VP1. The footprint of the strongly bound third repeat extends down the north side of the canyon. Since the receptor molecule can bind to two adjacent copies of VP1, we suggest that the bound receptor "staples" the VP1s together and must be detached before release of the RNA can occur. When the receptor is bound to neighboring sites on HRV2, steric hindrance prevents binding of the second repeat.