Novel Protein-Protein Contacts Facilitate mRNA 3′-Processing Signal Recognition by Rna15 and Hrp1

Precise 3′-end processing of mRNA is essential for correct gene expression, yet in yeast, 3′-processing signals consist of multiple ambiguous sequence elements. Two neighboring elements upstream of the cleavage site are particularly important for the accuracy (positioning element) and efficiency (efficiency element) of 3′-processing and are recognized by the RNA-binding proteins Rna15 and Hrp1, respectively. In vivo, these interactions are strengthened by the scaffolding protein Rna14 that stabilizes their association. The NMR structure of the 34 -kDa ternary complex of the RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains of Hrp1 and Rna15 bound to this pair of RNA elements was determined by residual dipolar coupling and paramagnetic relaxation experiments. It reveals how each of the proteins binds to RNA and introduces a novel class of protein-protein contact in regions of previously unknown function. These interdomain contacts had previously been overlooked in other multi-RRM structures, although a careful analysis suggests that they may be frequently present. Mutations in the regions of these contacts disrupt 3′-end processing, suggesting that they may structurally organize the ribonucleoprotein complexes responsible for RNA processing.     

The interplay between hMLH1 and hMRE11: role in MMR and the effect of hMLH1 mutations

Our previous studies indicate that hMRE11 plays a role in MMR, and this function of hMRE11 is most likely mediated by the hMLH1-hMRE11 interaction. Here, we explored the functional implications of the hMLH1-hMRE11 interaction in MMR and the effects of hMLH1 mutations on their interaction. Our in vitro MMR assay demonstrated that the dominant-negative hMRE11^452-634 mutant peptide (i.e., harboring only the hMLH1-interacting domain) imparted a significant reduction in both 3′ excision and 3′-directed MMR activities. Furthermore, the expression of hMRE11^452-634, and to a lesser extent hMRE11^1-634 (ATLD1), impaired G2/M checkpoint control in response to MNU and cisplatin treatments, rendering cells resistant to killings by these two anticancer drugs. Analysis of 38 hMLH1 missense mutations showed that the majority of mutations caused significant (>50%) reductions in their interaction with hMRE11, suggesting a potential link between aberrant protein interaction and the pathogenic effects of hMLH1 variants.     

Telomerase Activity Is Sensitive to Subtle Perturbations of the TLC1 Pseudoknot 3′ Stem and Tertiary Structure

Pseudoknot formation in the core region of the telomerase RNA has been demonstrated to be important for telomerase activity in vertebrates, ciliates, and yeast. Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase RNA (TLC1) pseudoknot identified tertiary structural interactions that are also important for telomerase activity, as previously observed for the Kluyveromyces lactis and human telomerase RNA pseudoknots. In addition, the contributions of backbone ribose 2′-OH groups in the pseudoknot to telomerase catalysis were investigated previously, using 2′-OH (ribose) to 2′-H (deoxyribose) or 2′-O-methyl substitutions in the stem 2 helix, and it was proposed that one or more 2′-OH groups from the stem 2 sequences at or near the triple helix participate in telomerase catalysis. Based on these studies and investigations of the structural and thermodynamic properties of the TLC1 RNA pseudoknot region, we have examined the structural and thermodynamic perturbations of the 2′-O-methyl and 2′-H substituted pseudoknots, using UV-monitored thermal denaturation, native gel electrophoresis, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Our results demonstrate the presence of A-form helical geometry perturbations in the backbone sugar substituted pseudoknots, show a correlation between thermodynamic stability and telomerase activity, and are consistent with the identification of the U809 ribose 2′-OH as a potential contributor to telomerase activity.     

RBM10 regulates alternative splicing

RBM10, originally called S1-1, is a nuclear RNA-binding protein with domains characteristic of RNA processing proteins. It has been reported that RBM10 constitutes spliceosome complexes and that RBM5, a close homologue of RBM10, regulates alternative splicing of apoptosis-related genes, Fas and cFLIP. In this study, we examined whether RBM10 has a regulatory function in splicing similar to RBM5, and determined that it indeed regulates alternative splicing of Fas and Bcl-x genes. RBM10 promotes exon skipping of Fas pre-mRNA as well as selection of an internal 5′-splice site in Bcl-x pre-mRNA. We propose a consensus RBM10-binding sequence at 5′-splice sites of target exons and a mechanistic model of RBM10 action in the alternative splicing.     

An Archaeal Dim2-Like Protein, aDim2p, Forms a Ternary Complex with a/eIF2α and the 3′ End Fragment of 16S rRNA

Dim2p is a eukaryal small ribosomal subunit RNA processing factor required for the maturation of 18S rRNA. Here we show that an archaeal homolog of Dim2p, aDim2p, forms a ternary complex with the archaeal homolog of eIF2α, a/eIF2α, and the RNA fragment that possesses the 3′ end sequence of 16S rRNA both in solution and in crystal. The 2.8-Å crystal structure of the ternary complex reveals that two KH domains of aDim2p, KH-1 and -2, are involved in binding the anti-Shine-Dalgarno core sequence (CCUCC-3′) and a highly conserved adjacent sequence (5′-GGAUCA), respectively, of the target rRNA fragment. The surface plasmon resonance results show that the interaction of aDim2p with the target rRNA fragment is very strong, with a dissociation constant of 9.8 × 10^− 10 M, and that aDim2p has a strong nucleotide sequence preference for the 3′ end sequence of 16S rRNA. On the other hand, aDim2p interacts with the isolated α subunit and the intact αβγ complex of a/eIF2, irrespective of the RNA binding. These results suggest that aDim2p is a possible archaeal pre-rRNA processing factor recognizing the 3′ end sequence (5′-GAUCACCUCC-3′) of 16S rRNA and may have multiple biological roles in vivo by interacting with other proteins such as a/eIF2 and aRio2p.