Interaction of NUB1 with the proteasome subunit S5a

NUB1 interacts with a ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8 to target the NEDD8 monomer and neddylated proteins to the proteasome for degradation. Therefore, NUB1 is thought to be a potent downregulator of NEDD8 conjugation system. Since NUB1 possesses a UBL domain, which was previously shown to be an S5a-interacting motif in RAD23/HHR23, we initially hypothesized that NUB1 interacts with the S5a subunit of the proteasome through its UBL domain. To examine this, we performed an in vitro GST pull-down assay and a yeast two-hybrid assay. Unexpectedly, our studies revealed that NUB1 directly interacts with the S5a subunit through its C-terminal region between amino acid residues 536 and 584, not through its UBL domain. Although the UBL domain was not an S5a-interacting motif in NUB1, our further studies revealed that the UBL domain is required for the function of NUB1.     

NEDD8 Ultimate Buster 1 Long (NUB1L) Protein Suppresses Atypical Neddylation and Promotes the Proteasomal Degradation of Misfolded Proteins

Neddylation is a posttranslational modification that controls diverse biological processes by covalently conjugating the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8 to specific targets. Neddylation is commonly mediated by NEDD8-specific enzymes (typical neddylation) and, sometimes, by ubiquitin enzymes (atypical neddylation). Although typical neddylation is known to regulate protein function in many ways, the regulatory mechanisms and biological consequence of atypical neddylation remain largely unexplored. Here we report that NEDD8 conjugates were accumulated in the diseased hearts from mouse models and human patients. Proteotoxic stresses induced typical and atypical neddylation in cardiomyocytes. Loss of NUB1L exaggerated atypical neddylation, whereas NUB1L overexpression repressed atypical neddylation through promoting the degradation of NEDD8. Activation of atypical neddylation accumulated a surrogate misfolded protein, GFPu. In contrast, suppression of atypical neddylation by NUB1L overexpression enhanced GFPu degradation. Moreover, NUB1L depletion accumulated a cardiomyopathy-linked misfolded protein, CryAB^R120G, whereas NUB1L overexpression promoted its degradation through suppressing neddylation of ubiquitinated proteins in cardiomyocytes. Consequently, NUB1L protected cells from proteotoxic stress-induced cell injury. In summary, these data indicate that NUB1L suppresses atypical neddylation and promotes the degradation of misfolded proteins by the proteasome. Our findings also suggest that induction of NUB1L could potentially become a novel therapeutic strategy for diseases with increased proteotoxic stress.     

NEDD8 Ultimate Buster-1 Long (NUB1L) Protein Promotes Transfer of NEDD8 to Proteasome for Degradation through the P97UFD1/NPL4 Complex

The NEDD8 protein and neddylation levels in cells are modulated by NUB1L or NUB1 through proteasomal degradation, but the underlying molecular mechanism is not well understood. Here, we report that NUB1L down-regulated the protein levels of NEDD8 and neddylation through specifically recognizing NEDD8 and P97/VCP. NUB1L directly interacted with NEDD8, but not with ubiquitin, on the key residue Asn-51 of NEDD8 and with P97/VCP on its positively charged VCP binding motif. In coordination with the P97-UFD1-NPL4 complex (P97^UFD1/NPL4), NUB1L promotes transfer of NEDD8 to proteasome for degradation. This mechanism is also exemplified by the canonical neddylation of cullin 1 for SCF (SKP1-cullin1-F-box) ubiquitin E3 ligases that is exquisitely regulated by the turnover of NEDD8.     

Yeast ornithine decarboxylase and antizyme form a 1:1 complex in vitro: Purification and characterization of the inhibitory complex

Saccharomyces cerevisiae antizyme (AZ) resembles mammalian AZ in its mode of synthesis by translational frameshifting and its ability to inhibit and facilitate the degradation of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). Despite many studies on the interaction of AZ and ODC, the ODC:AZ complex has not been purified from any source and thus clear information about the stoichiometry of the complex is still lacking. In this study we have studied the yeast antizyme protein and the ODC:AZ complex. The far UV CD spectrum of the full-length antizyme shows that the yeast protein consists of 51% β-sheet, 19% α-helix, and 24% coils. Surface plasmon resonance analyses show that the association constant (K_A) between yeast AZ and yeast ODC is 6 × 10⁷ (M⁻¹). Using purified His-tagged AZ as a binding partner, we have purified the ODC:AZ inhibitory complex. The isolated complex has no ODC activity. The molecular weight of the complex is 90 kDa, which indicates a one to one stoichiometric binding of AZ and ODC in vitro. Comparison of the circular dichroism (CD) spectra of the two individual proteins and of the ODC:AZ complex shows a change in the secondary structure in the complex.     

Binding of JAB1/CSN5 to MIF is mediated by the MPN domain but is independent of the JAMM motif

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) binds to c-Jun activation domain binding protein-1 (JAB1)/subunit 5 of COP9 signalosome (CSN5) and modulates cell signaling and the cell cycle through JAB1. The binding domain of JAB1 responsible for binding to MIF is unknown. We hypothesized that the conserved Mpr1p Pad1p N-terminal (MPN) domain of JAB1 may mediate binding to MIF. In fact, yeast two hybrid (YTH) and in vitro translation/coimmunoprecipitation (CoIP) analysis showed that a core MPN domain, which did not cover the functional JAB1/MPN/Mov34 metalloenzyme (JAMM) deneddylase sequence, binds to MIF comparable to full-length JAB1. YTH and pull-down analysis in conjunction with nanobead affinity matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry demonstrated that MIF(50-65) and MPN are sufficient to mediate MIF-JAB1 interaction, respectively. Finally, endogenous CoIP of MIF-CSN6 complexes from mammalian cells demonstrated that MPN is responsible for MIF-JAB1 binding in vivo, and, as CSN6 does not contain a functional JAMM motif, confirmed that the interaction does not require JAMM.     

PD‐L1/p‐STAT3 promotes the progression of NSCLC cells by regulating TAM polarization

PD‐L1 is closely related to the immune escape process of tumour cells, and targeted PD‐L1 clinical immunotherapy has been implemented. However, whether PD‐L1 is involved in TAM/M2 polarization in the TME of NSCLC and its specific mechanism remain unclear. In order to clarify the specific role of PD‐L1 in NSCLC and to seek new treatments for NSCLC, we designed a series of experimental studies. After constructing the co‐culture system and conditioned medium system, the proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, angiogenesis, EMT process and stemness of NSCLC were detected by MTT, flow cytometry, Transwell, endothelial cell tube formation and western blot assays. The results showed that αPD‐L1 reversed TAM/M2 polarization by suppressing STAT3 phosphorylation in TAM/M2, therapy inhibiting NSCLC cell migration, angiogenesis, EMT process and stemness. However, αPD‐L1 had no effect on the proliferation and apoptosis abilities of NSCLC cells. In vivo experiments showed that αPD‐L1 inhibited lung metastasis of NSCLC and reversed TAM/M2 polarization in TME. The study investigates the mechanism by which PD‐L1 regulates TAMs polarization in TME and promotes malignant progression of NSCLC, providing a new theoretical basis for PD‐L1 targeted therapy of NSCLC.     

Induction of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway in insulin-secreting cells is dependent on oxidative damage of mitochondria but independent of caspase-12 activation

Pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated beta cell apoptosis is activated through multiple signaling pathways involving mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum. Activation of organelle-specific caspases has been implicated in the progression and execution of cell death. This study was therefore performed to elucidate the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on a possible cross-talk between the compartment-specific caspases 9 and 12 and their differential contribution to beta cell apoptosis. Moreover, the occurrence of ROS-mediated mitochondrial damage in response to beta cell toxic cytokines has been quantified. ER-specific caspase-12 was strongly activated in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines; however, its inhibition did not abolish cytokine-induced mitochondrial caspase-9 activation and loss of cell viability. In addition, there was a significant induction of oxidative mitochondrial DNA damage and elevated cardiolipin peroxidation in insulin-producing RINm5F cells and rat islet cells. Overexpression of the H₂O₂ detoxifying enzyme catalase effectively reduced the observed cytokine-induced oxidative damage of mitochondrial structures. Taken together, the results strongly indicate that mitochondrial caspase-9 is not a downstream substrate of ER-specific caspase-12 and that pro-inflammatory cytokines cause apoptotic beta cell death through activation of caspase-9 primarily by hydroxyl radical-mediated mitochondrial damage.