Direct effect of PGF2α pulses on PRL pulses, based on inhibition of PRL or PGF2α secretion in heifers

The relationships between PRL and PGF_2α and their effect on luteolysis were studied. Heifers were treated with a dopamine-receptor agonist (bromocriptine; Bc) and a Cox-1 and -2 inhibitor (flunixin meglumine [FM]) to inhibit PRL and PGF_2α, respectively. The Bc was given (Hour 0) when ongoing luteolysis was indicated by a 12.5% reduction in CL area (cm²) from the area on Day 14 postovulation, and FM was given at Hours 0, 4, and 8. Blood samples were collected every 8-h beginning on Day 14 until Hour 48 and hourly for Hours 0 to 12. Three groups of heifers in ongoing luteolysis were used: control (n = 7), Bc (n = 7), and FM (n = 4). Treatment with Bc decreased (P < 0.003) the PRL concentrations averaged over Hours 1 to 12. During the greatest decrease in PRL (Hours 2-6), LH concentrations were increased. Progesterone concentrations averaged over hours were greater (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the controls. In the FM group, no PGFM pulses were detected, and PRL concentrations were reduced. Concentrations of PGFM were not reduced in the Bc group, despite the reduction in PRL. Results supported the hypothesis that a decrease (12.5%) in CL area (cm²) is more efficient in targeting ongoing luteolysis (63%) than using any day from Days 14 to ≥19 (efficiency/day, 10-24%). The hypothesis that PRL has a role in luteolysis was supported but was confounded by the known positive effect of LH on progesterone. The hypothesis was supported that the synchrony of PGFM and PRL pulses represents a positive effect of PGF_2α on PRL, rather than an effect of PRL on PGF_2α.     

Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin F2α biosynthesis during preluteolysis and luteolysis in heifers

Flunixin meglumine (FM; 2.5 mg/kg) was given to heifers at three 8-h intervals, 16 d after ovulation (first treatment = Hour 0) to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandin F_2α (PGF), based on plasma concentrations of a PGF metabolite (PGFM). Blood samples were collected at 8-h intervals from 15 to 18 d in a vehicle (control) and FM group (n = 16/group). Hourly samples were collected from Hours −2 to 28 in 10 heifers in each group. Heifers that were in preluteolysis or luteolysis at Hour 0 based on plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations at 8-h intervals were partitioned into subgroups. Concentration of PGFM was reduced (P < 0.05) by FM treatment in each subgroup. For the preluteolytic subgroup, the first decrease (P < 0.05) in P4 concentration after Hour 0 occurred at Hours 24 and 40 in the vehicle and FM groups, respectively. Plasma P4 concentrations 32 and 40 h after the beginning of luteolysis in the luteolytic subgroup were greater (P < 0.05) in the FM group. Concentration at the peak of a PGFM pulse in the FM group was greater (P < 0.05) in the luteolytic than in the preluteolytic subgroup. The peak of a PGFM pulse occurred more frequently (P < 0.001) at the same hour as the peak of an LH fluctuation than at the ending nadir of an LH fluctuation. In conclusion, a reduction in prominence of PGFM pulses during luteolysis delayed completion of luteolysis, and treatment with FM inhibited PGFM production more during preluteolysis than during luteolysis.     

Concentrations of circulating hormones during the interval between pulses of a PGF2α metabolite in mares and heifers

The temporal relationship of several hormones to a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) was studied in mares and heifers from the beginning of the first PGFM pulse during luteolysis to the end of the second pulse. Mares (n=7) were selected with a 9-h interval between the peaks of the two pulses. In mares, estradiol-17β (estradiol) increased (P<0.05) within each PGFM pulse and plateaued for a mean of 6h between the pulses, resulting in a stepwise estradiol increase. Progesterone decreased linearly (P<0.0001) throughout the intra-pulse and inter-pulse intervals of PGFM. In heifers (n=6), inter-pulse intervals were variable, and therefore Hours 1-4 of the first pulse (Hour 0=PGFM peak) and Hours -4 to -1 of the second pulse were used to represent the mean 8-h interval between peaks of the two pulses. Estradiol increased (P<0.05) during the ascending portion of each PGFM pulse and then decreased (P<0.05) beginning at Hour -1 of the first PGFM pulse and Hour 0 of the second pulse. The 1-h delay during the second pulse was accompanied by an apparent increase in PRL. A transient decrease in estradiol occurred in individuals between PGFM pulses at a mean of 5h after the first PGFM peak, concomitant with a transient LH increase (P<0.05). Results indicated that estradiol plateaued in mares and fluctuated in heifers during the interval between PGFM pulses. Heifers also showed temporal relationships between estradiol and LH and apparently between estradiol and PRL.     

Stimulatory effect of PGF2α on PRL based on experimental inhibition of each hormone in mares

During the luteolytic period in mares, the peak of 65% of pulses of a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM) and the peak of a pulse of PRL have been reported to occur at the same hour. It is unknown whether the synchrony reflects an effect of PGF2α on PRL or vice versa. Controls, a flunixin meglumine (FM)-treated group (to inhibit PGF2α), and a bromocriptine-treated group (to inhibit PRL), were used at 14 days postovulation in June and in September (n = 6 mares/group/mo). Blood samples were collected hourly from just before treatment (Hour 0) to Hour 10. Concentrations of PGFM in the FM group were lower (P < 0.05) at Hours 4 to 6 than in the controls in each month, but bromocriptine had no detected effects on PGFM. Concentrations of PGFM averaged over all groups and within each group did not differ between June and September. Compared to the controls, concentrations of PRL in June were lower (P < 0.05) in the FM group at Hours 4 to 8 and in the bromocriptine group at Hours 4 to 10. Concentration of PRL averaged over groups was lower (P < 0.0001) in September (0.9 ± 0.05 ng/mL, mean ± SEM) than in June (3.0 ± 0.3 ng/mL). Results supported the hypothesis that the positive association between PGFM and PRL concentrations in mares represents an effect of PGF2α on PRL rather than an effect of PRL on PGF2α.     

Stimulation of pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM) with estradiol-17β and changes in circulating progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse in heifers

A single physiologic dose (0.1 mg) of estradiol-17β in sesame-oil vehicle or vehicle alone (n = 8) was given to heifers on day 14 after ovulation to study the effect on circulating 13-14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM), PGFM pulses, and changes in progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse. Blood samples were collected hourly for 16 h after treatment. The estradiol group had a greater mean concentration of PGFM, greater number of heifers with PGFM pulses and number of pulses/heifer, and greater prominence of the PGFM pulses. Changes in progesterone concentrations were not detected during the 16 h sampling session in the vehicle group, indicating that the heifers were in preluteolysis. Progesterone decreased after 12 h in the estradiol group, indicating a luteolytic effect of the estradiol-induced PGF secretion as represented by PGFM concentrations. Intrapulse changes in progesterone were detected during a PGFM pulse in the estradiol group (P < 0.006), but not in the vehicle group. Progesterone increased (P < 0.01) between Hours −2 and −1 of an estradiol-induced PGFM pulse (Hour 0 = peak of pulse), decreased (P < 0.004) between Hours −1 and 0, and increased (P < 0.01) or rebounded between Hours 0 and 1. Results were compatible with previous reports of a role for estradiol in the induction of PGFM pulses in cattle and demonstrated intrapulse changes in progesterone concentrations during an induced PGFM pulse.     

Pulses of prolactin before, during, and after luteolysis and synchrony with pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α in heifers

Pulses of prolactin (PRL) and a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) were determined from hourly blood samples collected before, during, and after luteolysis (n=7 heifers). Progesterone concentrations were used to partition the results into six 12-h sets from 12h before to 36h after luteolysis. Pulses of PRL with a nadir-to-nadir interval of 4.4±0.2h were detected in each 12-h set. Pulses were rhythmic (P<0.05) in six heifers, beginning 12h before the end of luteolysis. The peak of a PRL pulse was greater (P<0.05) for the 12h after the end of luteolysis than for other 12-h sets, except for the last set of luteolysis. Area under the curve of a pulse was greater (P<0.05) for the 24h that encompassed the end of luteolysis than for two previous 12-h sets. Synchrony between the peaks of PRL and PGFM pulses was greater (P<0.03) during and after luteolysis (same hour for 29/39 pairs) than before luteolysis (0/12). Concentration of PRL centralized to the peak (Hour 0) of PGFM pulses was greater (P<0.05) at Hours 0 and 1 than at Hours -2, -1, and 3. Results supported the hypothesis that PRL is secreted in pulses in heifers. The pulses were most prominent and rhythmic during the last 12h of luteolysis and thereafter. The pulse peaks of PRL and PGFM were synchronized for most PRL pulses during and after luteolysis.     

Intrapulse temporality between pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α and circulating concentrations of progesterone before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis in heifers

Pulses of the prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF_2α (PGFM) and the intrapulse concentrations of progesterone were characterized hourly during the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods in seven heifers. The common hour of the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis was based on a progressive progesterone decrease when assessed only at the peaks of successive oscillations. The end of the luteolytic period was defined as a decrease in progesterone to 1 ng/mL. Blood samples were taken hourly from 15 d after ovulation until luteal regression as determined by color-Doppler ultrasonography. Between Hours −2 and 2 (Hour 0 = PGFM peak) of the last PGFM pulse of the preluteolytic period, progesterone decreased between Hours −1 and 0, and then returned to the prepulse concentration. Concentration did not change significantly thereafter until a PGFM pulse early in the luteolytic period; progesterone decreased by Hour 0 and transiently rebounded after Hour 0, but not to the prepulse concentration. In the later portion of the luteolytic period, progesterone also decreased between Hours −1 and 0 but did not rebound. After the defined end of luteolysis, progesterone decreased slightly throughout a PGFM pulse. Results demonstrated for the first time that the patterns of progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse differ considerably among the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods.     

Induction of PGFM pulses and luteolysis by sequential estradiol-17β treatments in heifers

The effects of sequential induction of PGFM pulses by estradiol-17β (E2) on prominence of PGFM pulses and progesterone (P4) concentration were studied in heifers. Three treatments of vehicle (n = 12) or E2 (n = 12) at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg were given at 12-h intervals beginning on Day 15 postovulation. Blood samples were collected every 12 h from Days 13-24 and hourly for 12 h after the first and third treatments. On Day 15, all heifers were in preluteolysis and on Day 16 were in preluteolysis in the vehicle-treated heifers (n = 11) and either preluteolysis (n = 4) or luteolysis (n = 8) in the E2-treated heifers. Peak concentration of induced PGFM pulses during preluteolysis on Day 15 was greater (P < 0.04) than for pulses during preluteolysis on Day 16. The interval from ovulation to the beginning of luteolysis was shorter (P < 0.04) in the E2-treated heifers than in the vehicle-treated heifers. An E2-induced PGFM pulse was less prominent (P < 0.008) in heifers in temporal association with a transient resurgence in P4 than in heifers with a progressive P4 decrease. The hypothesis that repeated E2 exposure stimulates increasing prominence of PGFM pulses was not supported. Instead, repeated exposure reduced the prominence of PGFM pulses, in contrast to the stimulation from the first E2 treatment. Reduced prominence of a PGF_2α pulse during luteolysis can lead to a transient resurgence in P4 concentration.     

Concentrations of circulating hormones normalized to pulses of a prostaglandin F2α metabolite during spontaneous luteolysis in mares

The temporal relationships between a pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF_2α (PGFM) and the concentrations of circulating hormones during the luteolytic period were studied for 11 pulses in 11 mares (Equus caballus) using samples collected hourly. Mean PGFM pulses encompassed 4 h before to 4 h after the peak, and hormone data were normalized to the PGFM peak (Hour 0). Concentration of progesterone decreased (P < 0.05) between Hours –4 and –3 and continued to decrease linearly throughout the PGFM pulse. The concentrations of cortisol and prolactin increased (P < 0.004) during Hours –4 to 0 and decreased (P < 0.002) during Hours 0 to 4. Estradiol concentration increased (P < 0.02) during Hours –4 to 0 but did not change significantly after Hour 0. Concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone did not change significantly during the PGFM pulse, and the oxytocin results were equivocal. Percentage of corpus luteum area with color-Doppler signals of blood flow did not change significantly between Hours –4 and 0 and first began to decrease (P < 0.004) between Hours 0 and 2. Results demonstrated that concentrations of progesterone decreased linearly during a PGFM pulse, and cortisol, prolactin, and estradiol increased during the ascending portion of the pulse. The progesterone and gonadotropin results supported the hypothesis that the initial progesterone and gonadotropin increases that have been reported to occur in response to a single bolus luteolytic treatment with prostaglandin F_2α do not occur in response to the natural secretion of prostaglandin F_2α.     

Ovarian and PGF2α responses to stimulation of endogenous PRL pulses during the estrous cycle in mares

The effects of a PRL-stimulating substance (sulpiride) on PRL and PGF2α secretion and on luteal and ovarian follicular dynamics were studied during the estrous cycle in mares. A control group (n = 9) and a sulpiride group (Sp; n = 10) were used. Sulpiride (25 mg) was given every 8 h from Day 13 postovulation to the next ovulation. Repeated sulpiride treatment did not appear to maintain PRL concentrations at 12-h intervals beyond Day 14. Therefore, the hypothesis that a long-term increase in PRL altered luteal and follicular end points was not testable. Hourly samples were collected from the hour of a treatment (Hour 0) to Hour 8 on Day 14. Concentrations of PRL increased to maximum at Hour 4 in the Sp group. The PRL pulses were more prominent (P < 0.008) in the sulpiride group (peak, 19.4 ± 1.9 ng/mL; mean ± SEM) than in the controls (11.5 ± 1.8 ng/mL). Concentrations of a metabolite of PGF2α (PGFM), number, and characteristics of PGFM pulses, and concentrations of progesterone during Hours 0 to 8 were not affected by the increased PRL. A novel observation was that the peak of a PRL pulse occurred at the same hour or 1 h later than the peak of a PGFM pulse in 8 of 8 PGFM pulses in the controls and in 6 of 10 pulses in the Sp group (P < 0.04), indicating that sulpiride interfered with the synchrony between PGFM and PRL pulses. The hypothesis that sulpiride treatment during the equine estrous cycle increases concentrations of PRL and the prominence of PRL pulses was supported.     

Temporal associations among pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha, luteal blood flow, and luteolysis in cattle

Luteal blood flow was studied in heifers by transrectal color-Doppler ultrasound. Data were normalized to the decrease in plasma progesterone to <1 ng/ml (Day 0 or Hour 0). Blood flow in the corpus luteum (CL) was estimated by the percentage of CL area with color flow signals. Systemic prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) treatment (25 mg; n=4) resulted in a transient increase in CL blood flow during the initial portion of the induced decrease in progesterone. Intrauterine treatment (1 or 2 mg) was done to preclude hypothetical secondary effects of systemic treatment. Heifers were grouped into responders (luteolysis; n=3) and nonresponders (n=5). Blood flow increased transiently in both groups; induction of increased blood flow did not assure the occurrence of luteolysis. A transient increase in CL blood flow was not detected in association with spontaneous luteolysis when examinations were done every 12 h (n=6) or 24 h (n=10). The role of PGF pulses was studied by examinations every hour during a 12-h window each day during expected spontaneous luteolysis. At least one pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) was identified in each of six heifers during the luteolytic period (Hours -48 to -1). Blood flow increased (P<0.02) during the 3-h ascending portion of the PGFM pulse, remained elevated for 2 h after the PGFM peak, and then decreased (P<0.03) to baseline. Results supported the hypothesis that CL blood flow increased and decreased with individual PGFM pulses during spontaneous luteolysis.     

Differential luteolytic function between the physiological breeding season,autumn transition and persistent winter cyclicity in the mare

There is a well-documented increase in luteolytic failure, resulting in spontaneously prolonged corpus luteum (SPCL) function, during estrous cycles of horses in autumn. The cause of this phenomenon may be due to seasonal alterations in PGF_2α and/or in prolactin (PRL) secretion around luteolysis. To investigate this, progesterone (P4), 13, 14-dihydro, 15-keto PGF_2α (PGFM) and PRL concentrations were compared between summer and autumn estrous cycles during natural luteolysis and luteolysis induced by benign uterine stimulation. A single estrous cycle from mares in June–July (n = 12) was compared to multiple estrous cycles from these 12 mares plus 8 additional mares in September through December. Reproductive behavior was monitored by bringing a stallion in close proximity to the mare and ovarian events by ultrasonography. Blood was collected via jugular cannula every 6 h from d 13 to 17 post-ovulation in untreated control mares (n = 8 summer, n = 9 autumn). In treated mares, blood collection occurred at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min followed by 6 h intervals for a total of 5 d following intrauterine saline infusion on d 7 (n = 4 summer, n = 11 autumn). Mares failing to return to estrus for 30 d received intrauterine saline and the described intensive blood sampling protocol on d 30. Progesterone and PRL were determined on daily samples and PGFM on frequent plasma collections by RIA. Duration of ovarian luteal and follicular phases, P4 and PRL concentrations and PGFM secretion around luteolysis were compared between treatments and seasons by ANOVA. Mean P4 declined from June to December in all groups. Pulses of PGFM were detected on d 13–17 in controls and d 7–11 in saline-infused mares. Pulse patterns were not different between groups. The incidence of SPCL increased during autumn in the control group. PGFM pulses were absent on d 13–17 in mares with SPCL, but PGFM pulses could be induced in these mares by saline infusion at d 30. Autumn PGFM profiles were unchanged during spontaneous or saline-induced luteolysis compared with summer. Circulating PRL increased around natural or induced luteolysis. These results provide evidence that changes in luteal function during the autumn transition are not the result of alterations in the ability of the uterus to produce PGF_2α nor due to changed CL sensitivity to PGF_2α. We conclude that seasonal changes in luteolytic function are caused by an alteration in the signal for PGF_2α release.     

Pulsatility and interrelationships of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM), luteinizing hormone, progesterone, and estradiol in heifers

Temporality among episodes of a prostaglandin F2alpha metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P4), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2) were studied during preluteolysis and luteolysis. A vehicle group (n = 10) and a group with an E2-induced PGFM pulse (n = 10) were used. Blood sampling was done every 0.25 h for 8 h. An episode was identified by comparing its coefficient of variation (CV) with the intra-assay CV. Pulsatility of PGFM, P4, LH, and E2 in individual heifers was inferred if the autocorrelation functions were different (P < 0.05) from zero. About four nonrhythmic fluctuations of PGFM/8 h were superimposed on PGFM pulses. Pulsatility was detected for LH but not for P4 and E2. A transient increase in P4 was not detected during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse. Progesterone decreased (P < 0.003) during Hours -1.25 to -0.50 of the PGFM pulse (Hour 0 = peak) and ceased to decrease temporally with an increase (P < 0.05) in LH. Maximum P4 concentration occurred 0.25 h after an LH pulse peak, and an increase (P < 0.005) in E2 began at the LH peak. Nadirs of LH pulses were greater (P < 0.05) and the nadir-to-nadir interval was shorter (P < 0.003) in the E2 group, which is consistent with reported characteristics during luteolysis. The results did not support the hypothesis of a transient P4 increase early in a PGFM pulse and indicated a balance between a luteolytic effect of PGF and a luteotropic effect of LH within the hours of a PGFM pulse.     

Stimulation of a pulse of LH and reduction in PRL concentration by a physiologic dose of GnRH before, during, and after luteolysis in heifers

A single physiologic dose (5.0 μg) of GnRH was given to 9 heifers each day (Hour 0) beginning on Day 15 postovulation until regression of the corpus luteum. Blood samples were taken each day for Hours -3, -2, -1, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Based on daily progesterone concentrations, data were grouped into phases of before (n=4), during (n=8), and after (n=7) luteolysis. The number of LH pulses with a peak at pretreatment Hours -2 or -1 (0.35 ± 0.12 pulses/sampling session) was less (P<0.0001) than for a pulse peak at posttreatment Hours 1 or 2 (1.0 ± 0.0 pulses/session). The characteristics and effects of LH pulses on progesterone and estradiol were similar between natural (pretreatment) and primarily induced (posttreatment) LH pulses. The same dose of GnRH stimulated an LH pulse with greater (P<0.05) amplitude after luteolysis than during luteolysis. Concentrations of PRL and number and prominence of PRL pulses decreased (P<0.05) between Hours 0 and 2 within each of the phases of before, during, and after luteolysis. The hypothesis that a physiologic dose of GnRH increases the concentration of PRL was not supported; instead, GnRH reduced the concentration of PRL. Results supported the hypotheses that an appropriate dose of GnRH stimulates an LH pulse during luteolysis that is similar to a natural pulse in characteristics and in the effects on progesterone and estradiol.     

Use of a five-day progesterone-based timed AI protocol to determine if flunixin meglumine improves pregnancy per timed AI in dairy heifers

Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR (Controlled Internal Drug Release insert containing progesterone) protocol could be applied as an efficient timed AI (TAI) protocol in dairy heifers, and that treatment with flunixin meglumine (FM) during the period of CL maintenance would increase pregnancy per TAI (P/TAI) and late survival of embryos. Objectives were: 1) in Experiment 1, to compare P/TAI with the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol to a PGF_2α/GnRH protocol; and 2) in Experiment 2, to determine if FM administered 15.5 and 16 d after first TAI would increase P/TAI, using the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol with a new or previously used (5 d) CIDR insert.In Experiment 1, 248 heifers were assigned randomly to either the PGF_2α/GnRH protocol (n = 120) or the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol (n = 128). Pregnancy per TAI did not differ between the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol (53.1%) and the PGF_2α/GnRH protocol (45.8%; P = 0.22). In Experiment 2, 325 heifers synchronized with the 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol were assigned randomly to receive two injections of FM (FM group; n = 158) at 15.5 and 16 d after TAI, or to remain as untreated controls (n = 165). Pregnancy per TAI in Experiment 2 was 59.4 and 59.5% at 45 d for control and FM groups, respectively, with no differences between groups (P = 0.83). The 5 d Co-Synch + CIDR protocol resulted in an acceptable P/TAI in dairy heifers. However, FM did not improve P/TAI in dairy heifers.     

Role of LH in the progesterone increase during the bromocriptine-induced prolactin decrease in heifers

The luteotrophic effect of bromocriptine in heifers was studied to determine if the reported posttreatment increase in progesterone (P4) just before or at the beginning of luteolysis was attributable to loss of a luteolytic effect of prolactin (PRL) or to the stimulation of LH, a known luteotropin. Four treatment groups (n = 7) were used: control (Ct), bromocriptine (Bc; 16 mg/heifer), acyline (Ac; 3 μg/kg), and bromocriptine and acyline combined (BcAc). Bromocriptine (inhibitor of PRL) and acyline (antagonist of GnRH and therefore blocker of LH) were given at Hour 0 on Day 16 postovulation, and blood samples were taken hourly at Hours 0 to 8. Concentration of P4 was greater (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group at each of Hours 1 to 8. Concentration of LH increased (P < 0.05) between Hours 0 to 2 in the Bc group but not in the other three groups. The peak of the first posttreatment LH pulse occurred earlier in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Average concentration of PRL was lower (P < 0.05) and number of PRL pulses was less (P < 0.05) in the Bc group than in the Ct group. Acyline inhibited LH in the Ac and BcAc groups as indicated by a decrease (P < 0.05) in concentration between Hours 0 and 2 and a decrease (P < 0.001) in number of pulses/heifer during the 8 h. A decrease in PRL but not an increase in P4 and LH occurred in the BcAc group. Results supported the hypothesis that the P4 increase associated with PRL suppression by bromocriptine treatment is attributable to an increase in LH.     

Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle: role of estradiol

Involvement of estradiol in the deviation in growth rates between the two largest follicles of a wave was studied in 39 heifers. In experiment 1, the largest follicle remained intact in a control group and was ablated in five estradiol-treated groups when the largest follicle reached 8.5 mm or larger (expected beginning of deviation; Hour 0). The ablation groups were given a single injection of 0, 0.004, 0.02, 0.1, or 0.5 mg of estradiol. Blood samples were taken from a jugular vein every hour at Hours 0 to 16. By Hour 8, FSH concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in the ablation group that received 0 mg of estradiol than in the controls. Among the estradiol groups, that receiving 0.02 mg had the lowest detectable increase in estradiol. In this group, FSH concentrations were not suppressed below the control concentrations, but the increase in FSH concentrations following ablation of the largest follicle was delayed for 2 or 3 h. This delay in the increase of FSH concentrations corresponded to the hours that estradiol was maximal. In experiment 2, blood samples were taken every 4 h from the caudal vena cava cranial to the junction with the ovarian veins in heifers with the largest follicle intact (controls) or ablated at 8.5 mm or larger (Hour 0). Averaged over Hours 4 to 48, estradiol concentrations were higher (P < 0.04) in the controls than in the ablation group. During Hours 0 to 12, estradiol concentrations increased (P < 0.05) in the controls, whereas FSH concentrations decreased (P < 0.05). In the ablation group, estradiol concentrations were lower than in the controls by Hour 4, and FSH concentrations increased (P < 0.05) between Hours 4 and 12. These results support the hypothesis that the largest follicle releases increased estradiol into the blood at the beginning of follicular deviation, and that the released estradiol is involved in the continuing depression of FSH concentrations to below the requirement of the smaller follicles.     

In vivo effects of an intrafollicular injection of insulin-like growth factor 1 on the mechanism of follicle deviation in heifers and mares

In cattle and mares, free insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is higher in the future dominant follicle (F1) than in the future largest subordinate follicle (F2) before deviation in diameter or selection is manifested between the two follicles. The effect of IGF-1 on other follicular-fluid factors and on the destiny of F2 were studied in two experiments in each species, using a total of 40 heifers and 42 mares. An injection of IGF-1 was made into F2 at the expected beginning of deviation (heifers, F1 >or= 8.5 mm; mares, F1 >or= 20.0 mm; Hour 0). In heifers, follicular fluid was taken from F2 at Hours 3, 6, 12, or 24; each heifer was sampled only once. In mares, sequential F2 samples were taken from each mare at Hours 0, 6, and 24 or at Hours 12 and 24. Transvaginal ultrasound guidance was used for treatment and sample collection. In heifers, IGF-1 treatment of F2 stimulated the secretion of estradiol (P < 0.05) between Hours 3 and 6 and androstenedione (P < 0.05) between Hours 3 and 12. In F2 of control heifers, estradiol decreased (P < 0.05) and androstenedione did not change significantly. In mares, IGF-1 treatment of F2 did not affect the concentrations of estradiol during the 24-h posttreatment period; androstenedione decreased (P < 0.04) in the IGF-1 group and increased (P < 0.006) in the controls. Compared with control mares, the IGF-1 group had higher (P < 0.04) activin-A at Hours 12 and 24 and higher (P < 0.0006) inhibin-A at Hour 24. After ablating F1 at Hour 24 in mares, F2 became dominant and ovulated in more mares (P < 0.0002) in the IGF-1 group (12/14) than in the control group (2/14). These results are consistent with reported temporal relationships among follicular factors during deviation in both species and indicate that IGF-1 plays a key role in controlling the temporal relationships; however, no indication was found that IGF-1 stimulated estradiol production in mares during the 24 h after treatment.     

The roles of PGF2α and PGE2 in regression of the corpus luteum after intrauterine infusion of Arcanobacterium pyogenes in cows

To study the effect of bacteria in the uterus on the fate of the corpus luteum (CL), Arcanobacterium pyogenes was inoculated into the uteri of cows on Day 3 (Day 0 = day of spontaneous ovulation). Plasma concentrations of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF_2α (PGFM), 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE₂ (PGEM) and progesterone (P₄) were determined. In five cows, the developing CL regressed and first-wave dominant follicles, which normally become atretic, ovulated (Group OV) after bacterial inoculation. In another five cows (Group NOV) and five control cows, the developing CL did not regress and first-wave dominant follicles did not ovulate. In Group OV, PGFM concentrations increased by 126.2 pg/mL (from 36.8 ± 7.8 pg/mL on Day 3 to 163 ± 37.2 pg/mL on Day 6), with an increase ratio of 5.8-fold. Conversely, in Group NOV, PGFM had a greater increase of 198.4 pg/mL (from 128.2 ± 27.8 pg/mL on Day 3 to 326.6 ± 115.1 pg/mL on Day 5), but the increase ratio was only 2.3-fold. Although PGEM tended to increase in both groups, raw increases and increase ratios were small. Bacterial inoculation into the uterus stimulated the release of prostaglandins and affected the fate of the CL; in that regard, the CL was affected more by PGF_2α than by PGE₂, and the increase ratio of PGF_2α was more important than the raw increase.     

Sexual behavior of castrated boars treated with prostaglandin F2α

The objectives were to test the hypothesis that exogenous prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) temporarily restores sexual behavior of castrated boars, and to evaluate effects of PGF_2α on serum hormone concentrations. At 35 d after castration, nine lean-type adult boars were randomly assigned to three treatments in a 3 × 3 latin square (with three replicates). Treatments were three doses of PGF_2α doses (0, 10, and 20 mg) and three periods of treatment, with 5 d between each period. Serum testosterone (T) concentrations were non-detectable at the start of the experiment. Serum concentrations of estradiol (E2), LH, prolactin (PRL), and cortisol were unaffected (P > 0.05) by PGF_2α treatment. The interval from treatment to ejaculation in boars treated with 10 mg (758 s) or 20 mg (660 s) PGF_2α did not differ, but were different (P < 0.05) from control boars (>1 800 s). Ejaculation duration and false mounts differed (P < 0.05) between control boars and boars treated with 10 or 20 mg PGF_2α. In conclusion, PGF_2α treatment did not change serum concentrations of T, E2, LH, PRL, or cortisol, but restored sexual behavior. This restoration may have been due to an effect of PGF_2α directly in specific areas of the brain, or indirectly via release of other hormones that stimulated areas in the brain that affected sexual behavior.