Comparison of the A-T rich regions and the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase binding sites in phage phi 29 DNA.

By using a modification of the BAC spreading method for mounting the DNA for electron microscopy, partial denaturation maps of protein-free phi 29 DNA and of phi 29 DNA containing protein p3 were obtained. In phi 29 p3-DNA1 the protein does not seem to influence the melting of the ends of the molecules. The comparison of the partial denaturation map and the B. subtilis RNA polymerase binding sites indicates that five of the seven early promoters (A1, A2, A3, B2 and C2) are located in A-T rich DNA regions whereas the other two early promoters (B1 and C1) are located in less A-T rich sites.     

Differential functional behavior of viral phi29, Nf and GA-1 SSB proteins

DNA replication of 29 and related phages takes place via a strand displacement mechanism, a process that generates large amounts of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Consequently, phage-encoded ssDNA-binding proteins (SSBs) are essential proteins during phage 29-like DNA replication. In the present work we analyze the helix-destabilizing activity of the SSBs of 29 and the related phages Nf and GA-1, their ability to eliminate non-productive binding of 29 DNA polymerase to ssDNA and their stimulatory effect on replication by 29 DNA polymerase in primed M13 ssDNA replication, a situation that resembles type II replicative intermediates that occur during 29-like DNA replication. Significant differences have been appreciated in the functional behavior of the three SSBs. First, the GA-1 SSB is able to display helix-destabilizing activity and to stimulate dNTP incorporation by 29 DNA polymerase in the M13 DNA replication assay, even at SSB concentrations at which the 29 and Nf SSBs do not show any effect. On the other hand, the 29 SSB is the only one of the three SSBs able to increase the replication rate of 29 DNA polymerase in primed M13 ssDNA replication. From the fact that the 29 SSB, but not the Nf SSB, stimulates the replication rate of Nf DNA polymerase we conclude that the different behaviors of the SSBs on stimulation of the replication rate of 29 and Nf DNA polymerases is most likely due to formation of different nucleoprotein complexes of the SSBs with the ssDNA rather than to a specific interaction between the SSB and the corresponding DNA polymerase. A model that correlates the thermodynamic parameters that define SSB–ssDNA nucleoprotein complex formation with the functional stimulatory effect of the SSB on 29-like DNA replication has been proposed.