The patterns of binding of RAR, RXR and TR homo- and heterodimers to direct repeats are dictated by the binding specificites of the DNA binding domains.

We show here that, in addition to generating an increase in DNA binding efficiency, heterodimerization of retinoid X receptor (RXR) with either retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or thyroid hormone receptor (TR) alters the binding site repertoires of RAR, RXR and TR homodimers. The binding site specificities of both homo- and heterodimers appear to be largely determined by their DNA binding domains (DBDs), and are dictated by (i) homocooperative DNA binding of the RXR DBD, (ii) heterocooperative DNA binding of RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs, and (iii) steric hindrance. No homodimerization domain exists in the DBDs of TR and RAR. The dimerization function which is located in the ligand binding domain further stabilizes, but in general does not change, the repertoire dictated by the corresponding DBD(s). The binding repertoire can be further modified by the actual sequence of the binding site. We also provide evidence supporting the view that the cooperative binding of the RXR/RAR and RXR/TR DBDs to directly repeated elements is anisotropic, with interactions between the dimerization interfaces occurring only with RXR bound to the 5' located motif. This polarity, which appears to be maintained in the full-length receptor heterodimers, may constitute a novel parameter in promoter-specific transactivation.     

Unraveling protein-protein interactions in living cells with fluorescence fluctuation brightness analysis

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy is a potentially powerful tool for measuring protein-protein interactions directly in single living cells. We previously reported on the detection of homodimer formation in cells using molecular brightness analysis. Here, we extend the technique to detect binding between different proteins. Proteins are labeled with the fluorescent markers YFP and CFP. We first determine the coexpression ratio of both proteins by measuring the intensity ratio with a dual-color setup. The effect of fluorescence resonance energy transfer on the intensity ratio is explicitly taken into account. The brightness of cells coexpressing both proteins is measured in a single-color setup. Selecting the laser wavelength of the two-photon light source allows us to either coexcite both proteins or to selectively excite YFP-labeled proteins. This approach enables us to distinguish between homodimer and heterodimer formation. We first present the theory and then demonstrate experimental feasibility using the ligand binding domains of retinoic acid receptor (RARLBD) and of retinoid X receptor (RXRLBD). Both proteins form heterodimers, and RXRLBD also forms homodimers in the presence of its agonist. We explore binding between these proteins in the presence and absence of RXR agonist. Our results demonstrate that brightness analysis offers a quantitative method for determining protein interactions in cells.     

Isolation and characterization of unsaturated fatty acids as natural ligands for the retinoid-X receptor

The retinoid-X receptor (RXR) is a ligand activated nuclear receptor that is the heterodimer partner for many class II nuclear receptors. Previously identified natural ligands for this receptor include 9-cis retinoic acid (9cRA), docosahexaenoic acid, and phytanic acid. Our studies were performed to determine if there are any unidentified, physiologically important RXR ligands. Agonists for RXR were purified from rat heart and testes lipid extracts with the use of a cell-based reporter assay to monitor RXR activation. Purified active fractions contained a variety of unsaturated fatty acids and components were quantified by gas-liquid chromatography of derivatized samples. The corresponding fatty acid standards elicited a similar response in the reporter cell assay. Competition binding analysis revealed that the active fatty acids compete with [3H]9cRA for binding to RXR. Non-esterified fatty acids were analyzed from lipid extracts of isolated heart and testes nuclei and endogenous concentrations were found to be within the range of their determined binding affinities. Our studies reveal tissue dependent profiles of RXR agonists and support the idea of unsaturated fatty acids as physiological ligands of RXR.     

Controlled Dimerization of ErbB Receptors Provides Evidence for Differential Signaling by Homo- and Heterodimers

The four members of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases are involved in a complex array of combinatorial interactions involving homo- and heterodimers. Since most cell types express more than one member of the ErbB family, it is difficult to distinguish the biological activities of different homo- and heterodimers. Here we describe a method for inducing homo- or heterodimerization of ErbB receptors by using synthetic ligands without interference from the endogenous receptors. ErbB receptor chimeras containing synthetic ligand binding domains (FK506-binding protein [FKBP] or FKBP-rapamycin-binding domain [FRB]) were homodimerized with the bivalent FKBP ligand AP1510 and heterodimerized with the bifunctional FKBP-FRB ligand rapamycin. AP1510 treatment induced tyrosine phosphorylation of ErbB1 and ErbB2 homodimers and recruitment of Src homology 2 domain-containing proteins (Shc and Grb2). In addition, ErbB1 and ErbB2 homodimers activated downstream signaling pathways leading to Erk2 and Akt phosphorylation. However, only ErbB1 homodimers were internalized upon AP1510 stimulation, and only ErbB1 homodimers were able to associate with and induce phosphorylation of c-Cbl. Cells expressing AP1510-induced ErbB1 homodimers were able to associate with and induce phosphorylation of c-Cbl. Cells expressing AP1510-induced ErbB1 homodimers were able to form foci; however, cells expressing ErbB2 homodimers displayed a five- to sevenfold higher focus-forming ability. Using rapamycin-inducible heterodimerization we show that c-Cbl is unable to associate with ErbB1 in a ErbB1-ErbB2 heterodimer most likely because ErbB2 is unable to phosphorylate the c-Cbl binding site on ErbB1. Thus, we demonstrate that ErbB1 and ErbB2 homodimers differ in their abilities to transform fibroblasts and provide evidence for differential signaling by ErbB homodimers and heterodimers. These observations also validate the use of synthetic ligands to study the signaling and biological specificity of selected ErbB dimers in any cell type.     

Vitamin D receptor contains multiple dimerization interfaces that are functionally different.

The vitamin D receptor mediates the signal of 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by binding to vitamin D responsive elements in DNA as a homodimer or as a heterodimer composed of one vitamin D receptor subunit and one retinoid X receptor subunit. We have mapped the dimerization interfaces of the vitamin D receptor that is involved in homo- or heterodimer formation in the absence of DNA. While deletion of the first zinc finger region of vitamin D receptor diminished homodimerization activity, it did not affect heterodimerization. In contrast, a deletion just beyond the zinc finger region affected heterodimerization with retinoid X receptor, but not homodimerization. The zinc finger region alone could form a homodimer with full-length vitamin D receptor, but not a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor. The carboxy-terminal region was also necessary for heterodimer formation. This region showed only a weak dimerization activity in the absence of ligand, but this was dramatically increased in the presence of ligand for both homo- and heterodimerization. These results suggest that the vitamin D receptor has at least three dimerization interfaces whose functions are apparently distinguishable. These are located in the first zinc finger region, the region just beyond this zinc finger and in the carboxy-terminal region.     

Novel roles of retinoid X receptor (RXR) and RXR ligand in dynamically modulating the activity of the thyroid hormone receptor/RXR heterodimer

Many members of the type II nuclear receptor subfamily function as heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). A permissive heterodimer (e.g. peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor/RXR) allows for ligand binding by both partners of the receptor complex. In contrast, RXR has been thought to be incapable of ligand binding in a nonpermissive heterodimer, such as that of thyroid hormone receptor (TR)/RXR, where it has been referred to as a silent partner. However, we recently presented functional evidence suggesting that RXR in the TR/RXR heterodimer can bind its natural ligand 9-cis-RA in cells. Here we extended our study of the interrelationship of TR and RXR. We examined the potential modulatory effect of RXR and its ligand on the activity of TR, primarily using a Gal4-TR chimera. This study led to several novel and unexpected findings: 1) heterodimerization of apo-RXRalpha (in the absence of 9-cis-RA) with Gal4-TR inhibits T3-mediated transactivation; 2) the inhibition of Gal4-TR activity by RXRalpha is further enhanced by 9-cis-RA; 3) two different RXR subtypes (alpha and beta) differentially modulate the activity of Gal4-TR; 4) the N-terminal A/B domains of RXR alpha and beta are largely responsible for their differential modulation of TR activity; and 5) the RXR ligand 9-cis-RA appears to differentially affect T3-mediated transactivation from the Gal4-TR/RXRalpha (which is inhibited by 9-cis-RA) and TRE-bound TR/RXRalpha (which is further activated by 9-cis-RA) heterodimers. Taken together, these results further support our recent proposal that the RXR component in a TR/RXR heterodimer is not silent and, more importantly, reveal novel aspects of regulation of the activity of the TR/RXR heterodimer by RXR and RXR ligand.     

9-cis-retinoic acid inhibits androgen receptor activity through activation of retinoid X receptor

Although the retinoic X receptor (RXR) forms heterodimers with many members of the estrogen receptor subfamily, the interaction between RXR and the members of the glucocorticoid receptor subfamily remains unclear. Here we show that the RXR can form a heterodimer with the androgen receptor (AR) under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Functional analyses further demonstrated that the AR, in the presence or absence of androgen, can function as a repressor to suppress RXR target genes, thereby preventing the RXR binding to the RXR DNA response element. In contrast, RXR can function as a repressor to suppress AR target genes in the presence of 9-cis-retinoic acid, but unliganded RXR can function as a weak coactivator to moderately enhance AR transactivation. Together, these results not only reveal a unique interaction between members of the two nuclear receptor subfamilies, but also represent the first evidence showing a nuclear receptor (RXR) may function as either a repressor or a coactivator based on the ligand binding status.     

Functional evidence for retinoid X receptor (RXR) as a nonsilent partner in the thyroid hormone receptor/RXR heterodimer

Many members of the thyroid hormone/retinoid receptor subfamily (type II nuclear receptors) function as heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). In heterodimers which are referred to as permissive, such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor/RXR, both partners can bind cognate ligands and elicit ligand-dependent transactivation. In contrast, the thyroid hormone receptor (TR)/RXR heterodimer is believed to be nonpermissive, where RXR is thought to be incapable of ligand binding and is often referred to as a silent partner. In this report, we used a sensitive derepression assay system that we developed previously to reexamine the TR/RXR interrelationship. We provide functional evidence suggesting that in a TR/RXR heterodimer, the RXR component can bind its ligand in vivo. Ligand binding by RXR does not appear to directly activate the TR/RXR heterodimer; instead, it leads to a (at least transient or dynamic) dissociation of a cellular inhibitor(s)/corepressor(s) from its TR partner and thus may serve to modulate unliganded TR-mediated repression and/or liganded TR-mediated activation. Our results argue against the current silent-partner model for RXR in the TR/RXR heterodimer and reveal an unexpected aspect of cross regulation between TR and RXR.     

Quantitation of the Effect of ErbB2 on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Binding and Dimerization

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor is a member of the ErbB family of receptors that also includes ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. These receptors form homo- and heterodimers in response to ligand with ErbB2 being the preferred dimerization partner. Here we use (125)I-EGF binding to quantitate the interaction of the EGF receptor with ErbB2. We show that the EGFR/ErbB2 heterodimer binds EGF with a 7-fold higher affinity than the EGFR homodimer. Because it cannot bind a second ligand, the EGFR/ErbB2 heterodimer is not subject to ligand-induced dissociation caused by the negatively cooperative binding of EGF to the second site on the EGFR homodimer. This increases the stability of the heterodimer relative to the homodimer and is associated with enhanced and prolonged EGF receptor autophosphorylation. These effects are independent of the kinase activity of ErbB2 but require back-to-back dimerization of the EGF receptor with ErbB2. Back-to-back dimerization is also required for phosphorylation of ErbB2. These findings provide a molecular explanation for the apparent preference of the EGF receptor for dimerizing with ErbB2 and suggest that the phosphorylation of ErbB2 occurs largely in the context of the EGFR/ErbB2 heterodimer, rather than through lateral phosphorylation of isolated ErbB2 subunits.     

Homo- and heterodimerization of somatostatin receptor subtypes. Inactivation of sst(3) receptor function by heterodimerization with sst(2A)

Several recent studies suggest that G protein-coupled receptors can assemble as heterodimers or hetero-oligomers with enhanced functional activity. However, inactivation of a fully functional receptor by heterodimerization has not been documented. Here we show that the somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes sst(2A) and sst(3) exist as homodimers at the plasma membrane when expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Moreover, in coimmunoprecipitation studies using differentially epitope-tagged receptors, we provide direct evidence for heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3). The sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer exhibited high affinity binding to somatostatin-14 and the sst(2)-selective ligand L-779,976 but not to the sst(3)-selective ligand L-796,778. Like the sst(2A) homodimer, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer stimulated guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases after exposure to the sst(2)-selective ligand L-779,976. However, unlike the sst(3) homodimer, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer did not promote GTPgammaS binding, adenylyl cyclase inhibition, or extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in the presence of the sst(3)-selective ligand L-796,778. Interestingly, during prolonged somatostatin-14 exposure, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer desensitized at a slower rate than the sst(2A) and sst(3) homodimers. Both sst(2A) and sst(3) homodimers underwent agonist-induced endocytosis in the presence of somatostatin-14. In contrast, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer separated at the plasma membrane, and only sst(2A) but not sst(3) underwent agonist-induced endocytosis after exposure to somatostatin-14. Together, heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3) results in a new receptor with a pharmacological and functional profile resembling that of the sst(2A) receptor, however with a greater resistance to agonist-induced desensitization. Thus, inactivation of sst(3) receptor function by heterodimerization with sst(2A) or possibly other G protein-coupled receptors may explain some of the difficulties in detecting sst(3)-specific binding and signaling in mammalian tissues.