Breast reduction surgery and breast cancer risk: does reduction mammaplasty have a role in primary prevention strategies for women at high risk of breast cancer?

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy has been demonstrated to reduce breast cancer incidence in women with a high inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. For the majority of high-risk women, however, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is not an acceptable option for primary prevention of breast cancer. Several epidemiological follow-up studies have indicated that there may be a substantial reduction in breast cancer risk among women who have undergone breast reduction surgery. The authors reviewed the evidence from these studies, with emphasis on the problems inherent in interpreting the results of nonexperimental studies of elective medical procedures. Although such observational studies cannot demonstrate definitively that reduction mammaplasty reduces the risk of breast cancer, the evidence from these studies is sufficiently strong to warrant the evaluation of breast reduction surgery as an option for primary prevention in clinical studies of women at increased risk of breast cancer. The availability of a more acceptable surgical option for primary prevention of breast cancer could increase the number of women willing to choose risk reduction surgery and thus may result in an overall reduction in breast cancer mortality among high-risk women.     

Is there a real risk of radiation-induced breast cancer for postmenopausal women?

The risk of radiation-induced breast cancer decreases with increasing age at exposure. Thus, for calculating the individual risk for a patient undergoing mammography, age-related risk coefficients need to be used. In this report, the results of epidemiological studies on risks of radiation-induced breast cancer are reviewed indicating that the available data do not show the risk to be enhanced for women exposed at the age of 55 years or older. This lack of evidence is reflected by the fact that the risk coefficients recommended by national and international advisory bodies differ by a factor of 10 or more for age at exposure of 50–60 years or older. A hypothesis is proposed indicating that the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer might decrease considerably at the time of menopause. The hypothesis is based on the following line of arguments: (1) evidence has accumulated from molecular genetic studies indicating that the development of colorectal cancer requires a cascade of subsequent mutations consisting of at least seven genetic events. (2) For colorectal cancer, the annual rates of incidence and mortality increase with age to the power of 5–6. Thus, the number of mutation steps (minus 1) is approximately reflected by the power of age dependence. (3) For western populations, the incidence and mortality of breast cancer up to the age of about 50 years increase with age to the power of about 6, indicating that a similar number of genetic events might be involved in development of breast cancer as has been identified for colorectal cancer. (4) For women aged 50 years or older, breast cancer occurs at an annual rate that is about proportional to age or age squared. This may mean that after menopause, the processes in the multistep mutation cascade leading to breast cancer are slowed down by a factor of about 4 or more. (5) The constant relative risk model of radiation carcinogenesis implies for solid cancers that radiation acts by inducing additional mutations in the earlier steps of the multistep cascade. It is suggested that the break-point in the age-specific annual rate of breast cancer incidence at menopause is associated with a corresponding drop in radiation sensitivity with respect to induction of breast cancer. Received: 8 January 2001 / Accepted: 20 March 2001     

Does genetic counseling have any impact on management of breast cancer risk?

Despite there being an increasing literature on the impact of cancer genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health, there is a lack of data describing impact on risk management. Genetic counseling and testing for cancer predisposition genes aims to improve the future health of those at high risk through appropriate surveillance and screening. However, management of breast cancer risk in women with a family history of this disease is an area of controversy. Counseling services may recommend specific risk management options to women, who then rely on their local screening service to make provision. This study investigated the impact of genetic counseling on management of breast cancer risk in women attending Cancer Family Clinics. A total of 293 women attending four genetic clinics were enrolled. Rates of breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, mammography, biopsy, detected cancers, and other screenings were documented. Participants' perceived benefits and barriers to mammography were assessed along with cancer worry. Results show that rates of mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination were increased following clinic attendance (p < 0.001). Women in the under 35 age-group had limited access to screening. Rates for biopsy and detected cancers were low. Women reported positive attitudes to mammography, with few reported barriers. Contrary to previous studies, there was no evidence that anxiety about breast cancer impedes uptake of health surveillance methods. Genetic counseling had a positive impact on management of breast cancer risk. Whether this translates into future health gains remains to be established.     

Does night work increase the risk of breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

Objective: To conduct a systematic review, with meta-analysis, of studies assessing the association between night work and the risk of breast cancer, using available epidemiological evidence. Method: Relevant studies were identified by searching several databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles. We combined the relative risks (RR) from individual studies using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was carried out as the data showed statistically significant heterogeneity. Results: Thirteen studies consisting of eight case–control studies and five cohort studies were included in the analysis. In the combined analysis of all studies, night work was associated with an increased risk for breast cancer (RR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.08–1.33). The higher-quality studies showed a similar finding with a pooled RR of 1.40 (95%CI = 1.13–1.73). Both case–control studies (RR = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.17–1.50) and cohort studies (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.97–1.21) showed a positive association between night work and the risk of breast cancer. No publication bias was found either from Begg's funnel plot (P = 0.086) or the Egger's test (P = 0.107). Additional well-conducted and large-scale epidemiological studies are needed.     

Are air-conditioning maintenance personnel at increased risk of Legionellosis?

We surveyed by use of medical questionnaires and blood tests 21 maintenance workers involved with cleaning and servicing cooling towers and evaporative condensers at a large company to determine the frequency of pneumonia and antibody levels against Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. The 21 high-risk workers were compared with 27 low-risk workers, persons who were not directly involved in service or maintenance for the company. The overall prevalence of titers greater than or equal to 128 for the 21 high-risk workers was 19.0% compared with 22.2% for the low-risk group. There were no significant differences in the history of pneumonia between these groups. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.     

Does the modern urbanized sleeping habitat pose a breast cancer risk?

Due to its disruptive effects on circadian rhythms and sleep deprivation at night, shiftworking is currently recognized as a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). As revealed by the present analysis based on a comparative case-control study of 1679 women, exposure to light-at-night (LAN) in the "sleeping habitat" is significantly associated with BC risk (odds ratio [OR]?=?1.220, 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.118-1.311; p?相似文献   

Do adipokines underlie the association between known risk factors and breast cancer among a cohort of United States women?

Introduction: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer, but mechanisms underlying the association are unclear. Adipocyte-derived, cytokine-like adipokines have been suggested as contributory factors. To evaluate their association with breast cancer risk factors and breast cancer risk, we conducted a nested case-control study of 234 postmenopausal breast cancer cases and 234 controls in a cohort of U.S. women with prospectively-collected serum samples obtained in the mid 1970s and followed for up to 25 years. Methods: Adiponectin, absolute plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (aPAI-1), and resistin were measured by a multiplex immunoassay. Sex hormones were available for 67 cases and 67 controls. Results: Among controls, we found that lower levels of adiponectin and higher levels of aPAI-1 were correlated with increasing levels of estradiol (Spearman r = ?0.26, p-value = 0.033; r = 0.42, p = 0.0003), decreasing levels of sex hormone binding globulin (r = 0.38, p = 0.0013; r = ?0.32, p = 0.0076), and increasing body mass index (BMI) (r = ?0.31, p =  < 0.0001; r = 0.39, p =  < 0.0001). Hormones were not associated with resistin. Among the relatively small percentage of women using postmenopausal hormones at the time of blood collection (13.7%), aPAI-1 levels were higher than in non-users (p = 0.0054). Breast cancer risk was not associated with circulating levels of adiponectin (age-adjusted p for linear trend = 0.43), aPAI-1 (p = 0.78), or resistin (p = 0.91). The association was not confounded by BMI, parity, age at first full-term birth, age at menopause, current postmenopausal hormone use, and circulating sex steroid hormones. Furthermore, adipokine associations were not modified by BMI (p > 0.05). The lack of association with risk may be due to measurement error of the laboratory assays. Discussion: lower levels of adiponectin and higher levels of aPAI-1 measured in prospectively-collected serum from postmenopausal women were associated with increasing BMI but not breast cancer risk.     

Does consanguinity lead to decreased incidence of breast cancer?

Background: In the Middle East region, consanguinity remains to be a central feature where it has shown an increasing trend. Breast cancer is an extremely complex disease, characterized by a progressive multistep process caused by interactions of both environmental and genetic factors. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the possible effect of consanguinity on the risk of breast cancer in a population with a high rate of consanguinity and find the associated risk-modifying factors. Subjects and methods: The study included 167 Qatari and other Arab expatriates women with breast cancer and 341 age and ethnicity matched control women. A questionnaire that included the socio-demographic information, type of consanguinity, medical history, life style habits, dietary intake and tumor grade was designed to collect, the information of cases and controls. A total number of 214 breast cancer patients were approached and 167 cases completed the questionnaires with a response rate of 78%. Of the 417 healthy women who agreed to participate in this study, 341 responded to the questionnaire (81.8%). Results: The study revealed that the rate of parental consanguinity was lower in breast cancer patients (24%) than in controls (32.3%) (p = 0.062). Female controls were slightly younger (46.5 ± 11.9) than breast cancer patients (48.4 ± 10.7). Breast cancer incidence was significantly higher in Qatari women (34.1%) compared to other Arab women (65.9%) (p = 0.034). A significant difference was noted only in occupation of the studied women between cases and controls (p < 0.001). Overweight (46.7%) and obesity (32.9%) were significantly higher in female breast cancer patients compared to controls (p = 0.028). Overall, the mean coefficient of consanguinity was lower in breast cancer patients (0.014) than in controls (0.018) (p = 0.0125). Family history of breast cancer was significantly more often in breast cancer patients (14.4%) than in controls (6.2%) (p = 0.002). However, the family history of breast cancer was more often positive in cases of non-consanguineous parents (15.7%) than cases of consanguineous parents (10.0%). Conclusion: The present study revealed the lack of association between of breast cancer and the parental consanguinity in Arab women residing in Qatar. The family history of breast cancer and the body mass index (BMI) are highly associated with breast cancer.     

Do estrogens always increase breast cancer risk?

The etiology of breast cancer is closely linked to the female hormone estrogen, with high life-time exposure being suggested to increase breast cancer risk [Nature 303 (1983) 767]. However, there appears to be a disparity between studies attempting to establish an association between high estrogen levels and breast cancer risk. This disparity becomes smaller by taking into consideration a timing factor, and we propose that estrogens can increase, decrease, or have no effect on breast cancer risk, depending on the timing of estrogen exposure. We further propose that the timing of estrogenic exposures may play at least as important a role in affecting breast cancer risk as life-time exposure.     

What do women know about breast cancer prophylaxis and a healthy style of life?

AimThe aim of the study was to determine the factors influencing women's knowledge concerning breast cancer prophylaxis and find out the sources of the knowledge.BackgroundIn the Greater Poland region, breast cancer has been the most frequently detected tumour for years. The percentage of breast cancer cases has increased by 31% in the last decade.Materials and methodsThe study encompassed 337 women aged 40–59 who participated in the mammographic examinations. An original research tool was used which assessed the level of knowledge concerning breast cancer prophylaxis, the knowledge of health-oriented behaviour in this regard and the influence of the medical personnel on women's education.ResultsAge is a factor diversifying the knowledge of the breast self-examination method. Doctors and nurses were rarely indicated as a source of knowledge concerning breast cancer prophylaxis. The subjects presented a high level of knowledge of the factors increasing the risk of developing cancer.ConclusionsA correlation between the level of education and the knowledge of one's own breast to a degree which enables a woman to detect even a slight change was observed. Vital findings also concern the sources of knowledge concerning breast cancer prophylaxis. The results of the studies indicated little informative support on the part of the medical personnel; therefore, one should call for supplementing training courses for doctors and nurses focusing on the issues of prophylaxis, including the method of breast self-examination.     

Methylation of progesterone receptor isoform A promoter in normal breast tissue: An epigenetic link between early age at menarche and risk of breast cancer?

Emerging evidence indicates that some altered patterns of methylation that occur in breast tumors may also be found in breast tissue of healthy women in relation to the breast cancer (BC) risk factors. Progesterone receptor (PR) isoform α is a crucial regulator of breast hormone responsiveness and its hypermethylation plays an important role in the initiation and development of breast tumors. However, such a methylation change in healthy women and its link with the different risk factors has not yet been investigated. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship of possible methylation changes within a critical region in the promoter CpG island of PGR-α (progesterone receptor α) gene in the healthy women with a set of reproductive and nonreproductive BC risk factors. The breast tissues were collected from 120 cancer-free women who had undergone cosmetic mammoplasty. The genomic DNA was extracted from the breast tissues and the methylation level of PGR-α promoter CpG island was determined by using MeDIP-qPCR assay. Using regression analysis, we found that increasing menarche age is inversely associated with the high methylation of PGR-α promoter ( β = −0.790, SE = 0.362; P = 0.031). Although lactating women had more methylation than nonlactating women (P = 0.026, the t test), this result was not confirmed by regression models. Such an observation may be helpful in better understanding of the underlying mechanisms by which early age at menarche increases the risk of BC. However, this perspective requires further validations in larger studies of more subjects as well as the inclusion of other related genes.     

Oligogenic combinations associated with breast cancer risk in women under 53 years of age

Common, but weakly penetrant, functional polymorphisms probably account for most of the genetic risk for breast cancer in the general population. Current polygenic risk models assume that component genes act independently. To test for potential gene-gene interactions, single nucleotide polymorphisms in ten genes with known or predicted roles in breast carcinogenesis were examined in a case-control study of 631 Caucasian women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 53 years and 1,504 controls under the age of 53 years. Association of breast cancer risk with individual genes and with two- and three-gene combinations was analyzed. Sixty-nine oligogenotypes from 37 distinct two- and three-gene combinations met stringent criteria for significance. Significant odds ratios (ORs) covered a 12-fold range: 0.5-5.9. Of the observed ORs, 17% differed significantly from the ORs predicted by a model of independent gene action, suggesting epistasis, i.e., that these genes interact to affect breast cancer risk in a manner not predictable from single gene effects. Exploration of the biological basis for these oligogenic interactions might reveal etiologic or therapeutic insights into breast cancer and other cancers.     

Does life along the sea carry greater risk of thyroid cancer?

Aim of this study was to determine whether there are any differences between coastal and inland Dalmatia in incidence rates and clinical characteristics of thyroid cancer. Data on 651 persons who suffer from and have undergone surgery for thyroid cancer have been analysed. All patients lived in Dalmatia between 1997 and 2006. Data were collected via surveys, insight into medical histories and results of histopathological analysis. In Dalmatia, in the overall sample, there are no statistically significant differences in incidence between coastal and inland areas (chi2=3.03; df=1; p=0.082). Somewhat higher overall incidence has been recorded in the inland (8.5%000) than in the coastal Dalmatia (7.3%000). In the overall sample, in Dalmatia, women make up 81.4% of patients and papillary cancer accounts for 80.0% of all thyroid cancers. The ratio of papillary to folicullar cancer is 7.8:1 in coastal and 4.2:1 in inland Dalmatia. Papillary and medullary types are more common in the coastal area and follicular and anaplastic cancer types in the inland area and the differences are statistically significant (p>0.033). Epidemiological characteristics of thyroid cancer in coastal Dalmatia are in accordance with the characteristics of this cancer as described in iodine-sufficient areas: the most common type is papillary cancer, and the ratio of papillary to follicular is 7.8:1. Sex-wise, the coastal area records a higher ratio of male patients (1:3.8) than the inland area (1:7.1). There are no statistically significant differences in thyroid cancer incidence rates between coastal and inland Dalmatia. Epidemiological characteristics of thyroid cancer in inland Dalmatia are in some ways more similar to those of continental Croatia. This result could be the consequence of previous iodine insufficiency in inland Dalmatia.     

Prolonged breastfeeding reduces risk of breast cancer in Sri Lankan women: A case–control study

Goal: To assess the association between duration of breastfeeding and the risk of breast cancer in Sri Lankan women. Methods: We conducted a case–control study in women aged 30–64 years in selected health care facilities in the Western province. A total of 100 recent cases of breast cancer (histologically confirmed) and 203 controls (age and parity matched) were included. Detailed information regarding breastfeeding, menstruation, reproductive factors, passive smoking and other confounders was collected using a structured questionnaire. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multiple logistic regressions. Principle results: Multivariate analysis found that those women who breastfed for ≥24 months during lifetime had significantly lower risk of breast cancer than those who breastfed for less than 24 months (OR = 0.40; 95%CI = 0.22, 0.73). Compared to 0–11 months of lifetime breastfeeding, there was a 66.3% reduction in breast cancer risk in women who breastfed for 12–23 months, 87.4% reduction in 24–35 months and 94% reduction in 36–47 months categories. The mean duration of breastfeeding per child for ≥12 months was also associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.28, 0.94). The significant factors associated with increased risk of breast cancer were: post-menopausal women (OR = 1.74; 95%CI = 1.01, 3.01); having an abortion in the past (OR = 3.42; 95%CI = 1.75, 6.66) and exposure to passive smoking (OR = 2.96, 95%CI = 1.53, 5.75). Major conclusions: Prolonged breastfeeding significantly reduces the risk of breast cancer and this protective effect was supported by a dose–response relationship. Risk due to passive smoking should be emphasized in anti-smoking programmes.     

The ATM gene and breast cancer: is it really a risk factor?

The genetic determinants for most breast cancer cases remain elusive. Whilst mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 significantly contribute to familial breast cancer risk, their contribution to sporadic breast cancer is low. In such cases genes frequently altered in the general population, such as the gene mutated in Ataxia telangiectasia (AT), ATM may be important risk factors. The initial interest in studying ATM heterozygosity in breast cancer arose from the findings of epidemiological studies of AT families in which AT heterozygote women had an increased risk of breast cancer and estimations that 1% of the population are AT heterozygotes. One of the clinical features of AT patients is extreme cellular sensitivity to ionising radiation. This observation, together with the finding that a significant proportion of breast cancer patients show an exaggerated acute or late normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy, has lead to the suggestion that AT heterozygosity plays a role in radiosensitivity and breast cancer development. Loss of heterozygosity in the region of the ATM gene on chromosome 11, has been found in about 40% of sporadic breast tumours. However, screening for ATM mutations in sporadic breast cancer cases, showing or not adverse effects to radiotherapy, has not revealed the magnitude of involvement of the ATM gene expected. Their size and the use of the protein truncation test to identify mutations limit many of these studies. This latter parameter is critical as the profile of mutations in AT patients may not be representative of the ATM mutations in other diseases. The potential role of rare sequence variants within the ATM gene, sometimes reported as polymorphisms, also needs to be fully assessed in larger cohorts of breast cancer patients and controls in order to determine whether they represent cancer and/or radiation sensitivity predisposing mutations.     

The ATM gene and breast cancer: is it really a risk factor?

The genetic determinants for most breast cancer cases remain elusive. Whilst mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 significantly contribute to familial breast cancer risk, their contribution to sporadic breast cancer is low. In such cases genes frequently altered in the general population, such as the gene mutated in Ataxia telangiectasia (AT), ATM may be important risk factors. The initial interest in studying ATM heterozygosity in breast cancer arose from the findings of epidemiological studies of AT families in which AT heterozygote women had an increased risk of breast cancer and estimations that 1% of the population are AT heterozygotes. One of the clinical features of AT patients is extreme cellular sensitivity to ionising radiation. This observation, together with the finding that a significant proportion of breast cancer patients show an exaggerated acute or late normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy, has lead to the suggestion that AT heterozygosity plays a role in radiosensitivity and breast cancer development. Loss of heterozygosity in the region of the ATM gene on chromosome 11, has been found in about 40% of sporadic breast tumours. However, screening for ATM mutations in sporadic breast cancer cases, showing or not adverse effects to radiotherapy, has not revealed the magnitude of involvement of the ATM gene expected. Their size and the use of the protein truncation test to identify mutations limit many of these studies. This latter parameter is critical as the profile of mutations in AT patients may not be representative of the ATM mutations in other diseases. The potential role of rare sequence variants within the ATM gene, sometimes reported as polymorphisms, also needs to be fully assessed in larger cohorts of breast cancer patients and controls in order to determine whether they represent cancer and/or radiation sensitivity predisposing mutations.