Role of regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) in Ca(2+) oscillations and adaptation of Ca(2+) signaling to reduce excitability of RGS2-/- cells

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the GTPase activity of Galpha subunits to determine the duration of the stimulated state and control G protein-coupled receptor-mediated cell signaling. RGS2 is an RGS protein that shows preference toward Galpha(q).To better understand the role of RGS2 in Ca(2+) signaling and Ca(2+) oscillations, we characterized Ca(2+) signaling in cells derived from RGS2(-/-) mice. Deletion of RGS2 modified the kinetic of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) production without affecting the peak level of IP(3), but rather increased the steady-state level of IP(3) at all agonist concentrations. The increased steady-state level of IP(3) led to an increased frequency of [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations. The cells were adapted to deletion of RGS2 by reducing Ca(2+) signaling excitability. Reduced excitability was achieved by adaptation of all transporters to reduce Ca(2+) influx into the cytosol. Thus, IP(3) receptor 1 was down-regulated and IP(3) receptor 3 was up-regulated in RGS2(-/-) cells to reduce the sensitivity for IP(3) to release Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase 2b was up-regulated to more rapidly remove Ca(2+) from the cytosol of RGS2(-/-) cells. Agonist-stimulated Ca(2+) influx was reduced, and Ca(2+) efflux by plasma membrane Ca(2+) was up-regulated in RGS2(-/-) cells. The result of these adaptive mechanisms was the reduced excitability of Ca(2+) signaling, as reflected by the markedly reduced response of RGS2(-/-) cells to changes in the endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load and to an increase in extracellular Ca(2+). These findings highlight the central role of RGS proteins in [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations and reveal a prominent plasticity and adaptability of the Ca(2+) signaling apparatus.     

Determination of the contact energies between a regulator of G protein signaling and G protein subunits and phospholipase C beta 1

Cell signaling proteins may form functional complexes that are capable of rapid signal turnover. These contacts may be stabilized by either scaffolding proteins or multiple interactions between members of the complex. In this study, we have determined the affinities between a regulator of G protein signaling protein, RGS4, and three members of the G protein-phospholipase Cbeta (PLC-beta) signaling cascade which may allow for rapid deactivation of intracellular Ca(2+) release and activation of protein kinase C. Specifically, using fluorescence methods, we have determined the interaction energies between the RGS4, PLC-beta, G-betagamma, and both deactivated (GDP-bound) and activated (GTPgammaS-bound) Galpha(q). We find that RGS4 not only binds to activated Galpha(q), as predicted, but also to Gbetagamma and PLCbeta(1). These interactions occur through protein-protein contacts since the intrinsic membrane affinity of RGS4 was found to be very weak in the absence of the protein partner PLCbeta(1) or a lipid regulator, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5 trisphosphate. Ternary complexes between Galpha(q), Gbetagamma and phospholipase Cbeta(1) will form, but only at relatively high protein concentrations. We propose that these interactions allow RGS4 to remain anchored to the signaling complex even in the quiescent state and allow rapid transfer to activated Galpha(q) to shut down the signal. Comparison of the relative affinities between these interacting proteins will ultimately allow us to determine whether certain complexes can form and where signals will be directed.     

Phosphorylation of Ser166 in RGS5 by protein kinase C causes loss of RGS function

RGS5 is a member of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that attenuate heterotrimeric G protein signaling by functioning as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). We investigated phosphorylation of RGS5 and the resulting change of its function. In 293T cells, transiently expressed RGS5 was phosphorylated by endogenous protein kinases in the basal state. The phosphorylation was enhanced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and endothelin-1 (ET-1), and suppressed by protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors, H7, calphostin C and staurosporine. These results suggest involvement of PKC in phosphorylation of RGS5. In in vitro experiments, PKC phosphorylated recombinant RGS5 protein at serine residues. RGS5 protein phosphorylated by PKC showed much lower binding capacity for and GAP activity toward Galpha subunits than did the unphosphorylated RGS5. In cells expressing RGS5, the inhibitory effect of RGS5 on ET-1-induced Ca(2+) responses was enhanced by staurosporine. Mass spectrometric analysis of the phosphorylated RGS5 revealed that Ser166 was one of the predominant phosphorylation sites. Substitution of Ser166 by aspartic acid abolished the binding capacity to Galpha subunits and the GAP activity, and markedly reduced the inhibitory effect on ET-1-induced Ca(2+) responses. These results indicate that phosphorylation at Ser166 of RGS5 by PKC causes loss of the function of RGS5 in G protein signaling. Since this serine residue is conserved in RGS domains of many RGS proteins, the phosphorylation at Ser166 by PKC might act as a molecular switch and have functional significance.     

Ca2+/Calmodulin reverses phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate-dependent inhibition of regulators of G protein-signaling GTPase-activating protein activity

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G(i) and/or G(q) class G protein alpha subunits. RGS GAP activity is inhibited by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP(3)) but not by other lipid phosphoinositides or diacylglycerol. Both the negatively charged head group and long chain fatty acids (C16) are required for binding and inhibition of GAP activity. Amino acid substitutions in helix 5 within the RGS domain of RGS4 reduce binding affinity and inhibition by PIP(3) but do not affect inhibition of GAP activity by palmitoylation. Conversely, the GAP activity of a palmitoylation-resistant mutant RGS4 is inhibited by PIP(3). Calmodulin binds all RGS proteins we tested in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner but does not directly affect GAP activity. Indeed, Ca(2+)/calmodulin binds a complex of RGS4 and a transition state analog of Galpha(i1)-GDP-AlF(4)(-). Ca(2+)/calmodulin reverses PIP(3)-mediated but not palmitoylation-mediated inhibition of GAP activity. Ca(2+)/calmodulin competition with PIP(3) may provide an intracellular mechanism for feedback regulation of Ca(2+) signaling evoked by G protein-coupled agonists.     

RGS17/RGSZ2, a novel regulator of Gi/o, Gz, and Gq signaling

To identify novel regulators of Galpha(o), the most abundant G-protein in brain, we used yeast two-hybrid screening with constitutively active Galpha(o) as bait and identified a new regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein, RGS17 (RGSZ2), as a novel human member of the RZ (or A) subfamily of RGS proteins. RGS17 contains an amino-terminal cysteine-rich motif and a carboxyl-terminal RGS domain with highest homology to hRGSZ1- and hRGS-Galpha-interacting protein. RGS17 RNA was strongly expressed as multiple species in cerebellum and other brain regions. The interactions between hRGS17 and active forms of Galpha(i1-3), Galpha(o), Galpha(z), or Galpha(q) but not Galpha(s) were detected by yeast two-hybrid assay, in vitro pull-down assay, and co-immunoprecipitation studies. Recombinant RGS17 acted as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) on free Galpha(i2) and Galpha(o) under pre-steady-state conditions, and on M2-muscarinic receptor-activated Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3), Galpha(z), and Galpha(o) in steady-state GTPase assays in vitro. Unlike RGSZ1, which is highly selective for G(z), RGS17 exhibited limited selectivity for G(o) among G(i)/G(o) proteins. All RZ family members reduced dopamine-D2/Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of cAMP formation and abolished thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor/Galpha(q)-mediated calcium mobilization. RGS17 is a new RZ member that preferentially inhibits receptor signaling via G(i/o), G(z), and G(q) over G(s) to enhance cAMP-dependent signaling and inhibit calcium signaling. Differences observed between in vitro GAP assays and whole-cell signaling suggest additional determinants of the G-protein specificity of RGS GAP effects that could include receptors and effectors.     

Galpha(12) and galpha(13) inhibit Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis through Rho/Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway

The release of neurotransmitters is known to be regulated by activation of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors, although precise mechanisms have not yet been elucidated. To assess the role of the G(12) family of heterotrimeric G proteins in the regulation of neurotransmitter release, we established PC12 cell lines that expressed constitutively active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13) using an isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside-inducible expression system. In the cells, expression of constitutively active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13) inhibited the high K(+)-evoked [(3)H]dopamine release without any effect on the high K(+)-induced increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. A Ca(2+) ionophore ionomycin-induced [(3)H]dopamine release was also inhibited by the expression of active Galpha(12) or Galpha(13). These inhibitory effects of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) on [(3)H]dopamine release were mimicked by the expression of constitutively active RhoA. In addition, Y-27632, and inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase, a downstream Rho effector, completely abolished the inhibition of [(3)H]dopamine release by Galpha(12), Galpha(13), and RhoA. These results indicate that Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis is regulated by Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) through a Rho/Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway.     

Differential effects of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins on serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and dopamine D2 receptor-mediated signaling and adenylyl cyclase activity

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins function as GTPase accelerating proteins (GAP) for Galpha subunits, attenuating G-protein-coupled receptor signal transduction. The present study tested the ability of members of different subfamilies of RGS proteins to modulate both G-protein-dependent and -independent signaling in mammalian cells. RGS4, RGS10, and RGSZ1 significantly attenuated Galphai-mediated signaling by 5-HT1A, but not by dopamine D2, receptor-expressing cells. Additionally, RGS4 and RGS10 significantly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in both cell lines. In contrast, RGS2, RGS7, and RGSZ1 had no effect on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in these cells. RGS2 and RGS7 significantly decreased Galphaq-mediated signaling by 5-HT2A receptors, confirming that the RGS4 and RGS10 effects on forskolin-stimulated cAMP production were specific, and not simply due to overexpression. Interestingly, similar expression levels of RGS4 protein resulted in greater inhibition of G-protein-independent cAMP production compared to G-protein-dependent GAP activity. Our results suggest specificity and selectivity of RGS proteins on G-protein-dependent and -independent signaling in mammalian cells.     

Spinophilin/neurabin reciprocally regulate signaling intensity by G protein-coupled receptors

Spinophilin (SPL) and neurabin (NRB) are structurally similar scaffolding proteins with several protein binding modules, including actin and PP1 binding motifs and PDZ and coiled-coil domains. SPL also binds regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and the third intracellular loop (3iL) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to reduce the intensity of Ca(2+) signaling by GPCRs. The role of NRB in Ca(2+) signaling is not known. In the present work, we used biochemical and functional assays in model systems and in SPL(-/-) and NRB(-/-) mice to show that SPL and NRB reciprocally regulate Ca(2+) signaling by GPCRs. Thus, SPL and NRB bind all members of the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins tested (RGS1, RGS2, RGS4, RGS16) and GAIP. By contract, SPL, but not NRB, binds the 3iL of the GPCRs alpha(1B)-adrenergic (alpha(1B)AR), dopamine, CCKA, CCKB and the muscarinic M3 receptors. Coexpression of SPL or NRB with the alpha(1B)AR in Xenopus oocytes revealed that SPL reduces, whereas NRB increases, the intensity of Ca(2+) signaling by alpha(1B)AR. Accordingly, deletion of SPL in mice enhanced binding of RGS2 to NRB and Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR, whereas deletion of NRB enhanced binding of RGS2 to SPL and reduced Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR. This was due to reciprocal modulation by SPL and NRB of the potency of RGS2 to inhibit Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR. These findings suggest a novel mechanism of regulation of GPCR-mediated Ca(2+) signaling in which SPL/NRB forms a functional pair of opposing regulators that modulates Ca(2+) signaling intensity by GPCRs by determining the extent of inhibition by the R4 family of RGS proteins.     

G protein-dependent Ca2+ signaling complexes in polarized cells

Polarized cells signal in a polarized manner. This is exemplified in the patterns of [Ca2+]i waves and [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors in these cells. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling complexes in cellular microdomains, with the aid of scaffolding proteins, is likely to have a major role in shaping G protein-coupled [Ca2+]i signal pathways. In epithelial cells, these domains coincide with sites of [Ca2+]i-wave initiation and local [Ca2+]i oscillations. Cellular microdomains enriched with Ca(2+)-signaling proteins have been found in several cell types. Microdomains organize communication between Ca(2+)-signaling proteins in the plasma membrane and internal Ca2+ stores in the endoplasmic reticulum through the interaction between the IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum and Ca(2+)-influx channels in the plasma membrane. Ca2+ signaling appears to be controlled within the receptor complex by the regulators of G protein-signaling (RGS) proteins. Three domains in RGS4 and related RGS proteins contribute important regulatory features. The RGS domain accelerates GTP hydrolysis on the G alpha subunit to uncouple receptor stimulation from IP3 production; the C-terminus may mediate interaction with accessory proteins in the complex; and the N-terminus acts in a receptor-selective manner to confer regulatory specificity. Hence, RGS proteins have both catalytic and scaffolding function in Ca2+ signaling. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling proteins into complexes within microdomains is likely to play a prominent role in the localized control of [Ca2+]i and in [Ca2+]i oscillations.     

Regulation of G protein-mediated signal transduction by RGS proteins

RGS proteins form a new family of regulatory proteins of G protein signaling. They contain homologous core domains (RGS domains) of about 120 amino acids. RGS domains interact with activated Galpha subunits. Several RGS proteins have been shown biochemically to act as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for their interacting Galpha subunits. Other than RGS domains, RGS proteins differ significantly in size, amino acid sequences, and tissue distribution. In addition, many RGS proteins have other protein-protein interaction motifs involved in cell signaling. We have shown that p115RhoGEF, a newly identified GEF(guanine nucleotide exchange factor) for RhoGTPase, has a RGS domain at its N-terminal region and this domain acts as a specific GAP for Galpha12 and Galpha13. Furthermore, binding of activated Galpha13 to this RGS domain stimulated GEF activity of p115RhoGEF. Activated Galpha12 inhibited Galpha13-stimulated GEF activity. Thus p115RhoGEF is a direct link between heterotrimeric G protein and RhoGTPase and it functions as an effector for Galpha12 and Galpha13 in addition to acting as their GAP. We also found that RGS domain at N-terminal regions of G protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) specifically interacts with Galphaq/11 and inhibits Galphaq-mediated activation of PLC-beta, apparently through sequestration of activated Galphaq. However, unlike other RGS proteins, this RGS domain did not show significant GAP activity to Galphaq. These results indicate that RGS proteins have far more diverse functions than acting simply as GAPs and the characterization of function of each RGS protein is crucial to understand the G protein signaling network in cells.     

Alternate coupling of receptors to Gs and Gi in pancreatic and submandibular gland cells.

Many Gs-coupled receptors can activate both cAMP and Ca2+ signaling pathways. Three mechanisms for dual activation have been proposed. One is receptor coupling to both Gs and G15 (a Gq class heterotrimeric G protein) to initiate independent signaling cascades that elevate intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca+2, respectively. The other two mechanisms involve cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated activation of phospholipase Cbeta either directly or by switching receptor coupling from Gs to Gi. These mechanisms were primarily inferred from studies with transfected cell lines. In native cells we found that two Gs-coupled receptors (the vasoactive intestinal peptide and beta-adrenergic receptors) in pancreatic acinar and submandibular gland duct cells, respectively, evoke a Ca2+ signal by a mechanism involving both Gs and Gi. This inference was based on the inhibitory action of antibodies specific for Galphas, Galphai, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, pertussis toxin, RGS4, a fragment of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and inhibitors of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. By contrast, Ca2+ signaling evoked by Gs-coupled receptor agonists was not blocked by Gq class-specific antibodies and was unaffected in Galpha15 -/- knockout mice. We conclude that sequential activation of Gs and Gi, mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, may represent a general mechanism in native cells for dual stimulation of signaling pathways by Gs-coupled receptors.     

RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11 stimulate GTPase activity of Gi family G-proteins with differential selectivity and maximal activity

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) of heterotrimeric G-proteins that alter the amplitude and kinetics of receptor-promoted signaling. In this study we defined the G-protein alpha-subunit selectivity of purified Sf9 cell-derived R7 proteins, a subfamily of RGS proteins (RGS6, -7, -9, and -11) containing a Ggamma-like (GGL) domain that mediates dimeric interaction with Gbeta(5). Gbeta(5)/R7 dimers stimulated steady state GTPase activity of Galpha-subunits of the G(i) family, but not of Galpha(q) or Galpha(11), when added to proteoliposomes containing M2 or M1 muscarinic receptor-coupled G-protein heterotrimers. Concentration effect curves of the Gbeta(5)/R7 proteins revealed differences in potencies and efficacies toward Galpha-subunits of the G(i) family. Although all four Gbeta(5)/R7 proteins exhibited similar potencies toward Galpha(o), Gbeta(5)/RGS9 and Gbeta(5)/RGS11 were more potent GAPs of Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3) than were Gbeta(5)/RGS6 and Gbeta(5)/RGS7. The maximal GAP activity exhibited by Gbeta(5)/RGS11 was 2- to 4-fold higher than that of Gbeta(5)/RGS7 and Gbeta(5)/RGS9, with Gbeta(5)/RGS6 exhibiting an intermediate maximal GAP activity. Moreover, the less efficacious Gbeta(5)/RGS7 and Gbeta(5)/RGS9 inhibited Gbeta(5)/RGS11-stimulated GTPase activity of Galpha(o). Therefore, R7 family RGS proteins are G(i) family-selective GAPs with potentially important differences in activities.     

Regulator of G protein signaling Z1 (RGSZ1) interacts with Galpha i subunits and regulates Galpha i-mediated cell signaling

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins constitute a family of over 20 proteins that negatively regulate heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways by enhancing endogenous GTPase activities of G protein alpha subunits. RGSZ1, one of the RGS proteins specifically localized to the brain, has been cloned previously and described as a selective GTPase accelerating protein for Galpha(z) subunit. Here, we employed several methods to provide new evidence that RGSZ1 interacts not only with Galpha(z,) but also with Galpha(i), as supported by in vitro binding assays and functional studies. Using glutathione S-transferase fusion protein pull-down assays, glutathione S-transferase-RGSZ1 protein was shown to bind (35)S-labeled Galpha(i1) protein in an AlF(4)(-)dependent manner. The interaction between RGSZ1 and Galpha(i) was confirmed further by co-immunoprecipitation studies and yeast two-hybrid experiments using a quantitative luciferase reporter gene. Extending these observations to functional studies, RGSZ1 accelerated endogenous GTPase activity of Galpha(i1) in single-turnover GTPase assays. Human RGSZ1 functionally regulated GPA1 (a yeast Galpha(i)-like protein)-mediated yeast pheromone response when expressed in a SST2 (yeast RGS protein) knockout strain. In PC12 cells, transfected RGSZ1 blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase activity induced by UK14304, an alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist. Furthermore, RGSZ1 attenuated D2 dopamine receptor agonist-induced serum response element reporter gene activity in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In summary, these data suggest that RGSZ1 serves as a GTPase accelerating protein for Galpha(i) and regulates Galpha(i)-mediated signaling, thus expanding the potential role of RGSZ1 in G protein-mediated cellular activities.     

Endogenous RGS protein action modulates mu-opioid signaling through Galphao. Effects on adenylyl cyclase,extracellular signal-regulated kinases,and intracellular calcium pathways

RGS (regulators of G protein signaling) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins for the Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and act to regulate signaling by rapidly cycling G protein. RGS proteins may integrate receptors and signaling pathways by physical or kinetic scaffolding mechanisms. To determine whether this results in enhancement and/or selectivity of agonist signaling, we have prepared C6 cells stably expressing the mu-opioid receptor and either pertussis toxin-insensitive or RGS- and pertussis toxin-insensitive Galpha(o). We have compared the activation of G protein, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, stimulation of intracellular calcium release, and activation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway between cells expressing mutant Galpha(o) that is either RGS-insensitive or RGS-sensitive. The mu-receptor agonist [d-Ala(2),MePhe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin and partial agonist morphine were much more potent and/or had an increased maximal effect in inhibiting adenylyl cyclase and in activating MAPK in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o). In contrast, mu-opioid agonist increases in intracellular calcium were less affected. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the GTPase-activating protein activity of RGS proteins provides a control that limits agonist action through effector pathways and may contribute to selectivity of activation of intracellular signaling pathways.     

Identification of a novel alternative splicing variant of RGS5 mRNA in human ocular tissues

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins act as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Galpha subunits and negatively regulate G protein-coupled receptor signaling. Using RGS5 gene-specific RT-PCR, we have identified a novel alternative splicing variant of RGS5 mRNA in human ocular tissues. The alternative splicing of RGS5 mRNA occurred at position +44 (GenBank NM_003617), spliced out 174 bp (+44 to +218 bp) of the coding region, and encoded an RGS5s protein with a 108 amino acid N-terminal deletion. This study is the first to document alternative splicing of an RGS5 gene. We therefore studied RGS5 and RGS5s mRNA distribution in human tissues. In the eye, RGS5s was found to be highly expressed in the ciliary body and trabecular meshwork. It was also expressed in the kidney, brain, spleen, skeletal muscle and small intestine, but was not detectable in the liver, lung, heart. RGS5s was not found in monkey and rat ocular tissues, indicating species specificity for the eye. Comparing the recombinant RGS5 and RGS5s expression in HEK293/EBNA cells, RGS5s was present almost exclusively in the cytosolic fraction, whereas RGS5 was present in both membrane and cytosolic fractions. The data suggest that the N-terminal of RGS5 may be important for protein translocation to the cell membrane. Both RGS5 and RGS5s antagonized the rapid phosphorylation of p44/42 MAP kinase induced by Galphai coupled cannibinoid receptor-1 activation. RGS5, but not RGS5s, inhibited the Ca2+ signaling initiated by activation of Galphaq coupled angiotensin II receptors (AT1) and prostaglandin FP receptors. Cotransfection of RGS5s with RGS5 resulted in the blockade of RGS5 actions with respect to inhibition of the signal transduction initiated by activation of both AT1 and FP receptor, suggesting that RGS5s may contain functional domains that compete with RGS5 in the regulation of the Galphaq coupled AT1 and FP receptors. The unique expression pattern, cellular localization and functions of RGS5s suggest that RGS5s may play a critical role in the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways.     

Regulators of G protein signaling proteins as determinants of the rate of desensitization of presynaptic calcium channels.

Norepinephrine inhibits omega-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive presynaptic Ca2+ channels in chick dorsal root ganglion neurons through two pathways, one mediated by Go and the other by Gi. These pathways desensitize at different rates. We have found that recombinant Galpha interacting protein (GAIP) and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS)4 selectively accelerate the rate of desensitization of Go- and Gi-mediated pathways, respectively. Blockade of endogenous RGS proteins using antibodies raised against Galpha interacting protein and RGS4 slows the rate of desensitization of these pathways in a selective manner. These results demonstrate that different RGS proteins may interact with Gi and Go selectively, giving rise to distinct time courses of transmitter-mediated effects.