Structure of transfection-active histone H1/DNA complexes

Relationships between the structure of transfecting complexes of histone H1 and DNA and their transfection efficiency were studied. Transfection activity proved to be connected to complex aggregates. Low speed centrifugation of the complexes resulted in loss of the transfection activity. The complexes/aggregates were active with high efficiency in a broad range of weight input ratios r _i (0.1<r _i<30). Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), the complexes were imaged at negative, nearly electroneutral and positive charge conditions. Electroneutral complexes at r _i=1 showed a multitude of different complex forms. Fibrillar, network-like and branched structures were frequently present in one complex. Strongly positive charged complexes had a toroidal appearance. All these different forms contributed to the high transfection efficiency. Cellular uptake is supposed to be by phagocytosis.     

Oocyte-specific linker histone H1foo is an epigenomic modulator that decondenses chromatin and impairs pluripotency

Mammalian oocytes contain the histone H1foo, a distinct member with low sequence similarity to other members in the H1 histone family. Oocyte-specific H1foo exists until the second embryonic cell stage. H1foo is essential for oocyte maturation in mice; however, the molecular function of this H1 subtype is unclear. To explore the function of H1foo, we generated embryonic stem (ES) cells ectopically expressing H1foo fused to an EGFP (H1foo-ES). Interestingly, ectopic expression of H1foo prevented normal differentiation into embryoid bodies (EBs). The EB preparations from H1foo-ES cells maintained the expression of pluripotent marker genes, including Nanog, Myc and Klf9, and prevented the shift of the DNA methylation profile. Because the short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of H1foo-EGFP recovered the differentiation ability, H1foo was involved in preventing differentiation. Furthermore, ChIP analysis revealed that H1foo-EGFP bound selectively to a set of hypomethylated genomic loci in H1foo-ES, clearly indicating that these loci were targets of H1foo. Finally, nuclease sensitivity assay suggested that H1foo made these target loci decondensed. We concluded that H1foo has an impact on the genome-wide, locus-specific epigenetic status.     

Oocyte-specific linker histone H1foo is an epigenomic modulator that decondenses chromatin and impairs pluripotency

Mammalian oocytes contain the histone H1foo, a distinct member with low sequence similarity to other members in the H1 histone family. Oocyte-specific H1foo exists until the second embryonic cell stage. H1foo is essential for oocyte maturation in mice; however, the molecular function of this H1 subtype is unclear. To explore the function of H1foo, we generated embryonic stem (ES) cells ectopically expressing H1foo fused to an EGFP (H1foo-ES). Interestingly, ectopic expression of H1foo prevented normal differentiation into embryoid bodies (EBs). The EB preparations from H1foo-ES cells maintained the expression of pluripotent marker genes, including Nanog, Myc and Klf9, and prevented the shift of the DNA methylation profile. Because the short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of H1foo-EGFP recovered the differentiation ability, H1foo was involved in preventing differentiation. Furthermore, ChIP analysis revealed that H1foo-EGFP bound selectively to a set of hypomethylated genomic loci in H1foo-ES, clearly indicating that these loci were targets of H1foo. Finally, nuclease sensitivity assay suggested that H1foo made these target loci decondensed. We concluded that H1foo has an impact on the genome-wide, locus-specific epigenetic status.     

Possible role of H1 histone in replication timing

AT‐rich repetitive DNA sequences become late replicating during cell differentiation. Replication timing is not correlated with LINE density in human cells (Ryba et al. 2010). However, short and properly spaced runs of oligo dA or dT present in nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) of the genome are good candidates for elements of AT‐rich repetitive late replicating DNA. MAR attachment to the nuclear matrix is negatively regulated by chromatin binding of H1 histone, but this is counteracted by H1 phosphorylation, high mobility group proteins or, indirectly, core histone acetylation. Fewer MAR attachments correlates positively with longer average DNA loop size, longer replicons and an increase of late replicating DNA.     

DNA Methylation and Histone H1 Jointly Repress Transposable Elements and Aberrant Intragenic Transcripts

1. Download : Download high-res image (225KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

H1 Histone in Developing and Aging Coleoptiles of Etiolated Wheat Seedlings

It has been established that the DNA and H1 histone contents in aged coleoptile of 8-day-old etiolated wheat seedling are about 40 and 30%, respectively, lower than those in young seedlings. H1 histone in wheat seedlings is represented as six electrophoretically different subfractions. The ratios of H1 histone subfractions in wheat coleoptile and initial leaf are similar. In contrast to some animal cells, apoptosis in wheat coleoptile is not accompanied by changes in the set and ratios of H1 histone subfractions. Aging of coleoptiles is associated with a progressive diminution of the H1 histone and DNA contents. H1 histone/DNA ratio in aged coleoptile is 1.5-2-fold higher than that in the young organs. Therefore, the content of H1 histone in chromatin of coleoptile decreases with age more slowly than DNA content.     

Chemical synthesis of the ubiquitinated form of histone H3 and its effect on DNA methyltransferase 1

Posttranslational modifications of histone proteins, which form nucleosome cores, play an important role in gene regulation. Ubiquitination is one such modification. We previously reported on the synthesis of ubiquitinated histone H3 with an isopeptide mimetic structure. In this report, we describe the preparation of ubiquitinated histone H3 peptides with a native isopeptide structure, which showed a slightly weaker effect on the enzymatic activity of DNA methyltransferase 1 than the previous ubiquitinated H3 peptide analogs. These findings show that a native structure is important for determining the mechanism of the function, although ubiquitinated H3 peptide analogs can mimic the role of the original ubiquitinated H3. We also report on the successful preparation of the ubiquitinated full length histone H3.     

Histone H1 affects gene imprinting and DNA methylation in Arabidopsis

Imprinting, i.e. parent-of-origin expression of alleles, plays an important role in regulating development in mammals and plants. DNA methylation catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases plays a pivotal role in regulating imprinting by silencing parental alleles. DEMETER (DME), a DNA glycosylase functioning in the base-excision DNA repair pathway, can excise 5-methylcytosine from DNA and regulate genomic imprinting in Arabidopsis. DME demethylates the maternal MEDEA (MEA) promoter in endosperm, resulting in expression of the maternal MEA allele. However, it is not known whether DME interacts with other proteins in regulating gene imprinting. Here we report the identification of histone H1.2 as a DME-interacting protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen, and confirmation of their interaction by the in vitro pull-down assay. Genetic analysis of the loss-of-function histone h1 mutant showed that the maternal histone H1 allele is required for DME regulation of MEA, FWA and FIS2 imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm but the paternal allele is dispensable. Furthermore, we show that mutations in histone H1 result in an increase of DNA methylation in the maternal MEA and FWA promoter in endosperm. Our results suggest that histone H1 is involved in DME-mediated DNA methylation and gene regulation at imprinted loci.     

DNA methylation requires a DNMT1 ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) and histone ubiquitination

DNMT1 is recruited by PCNA and UHRF1 to maintain DNA methylation after replication. UHRF1 recognizes hemimethylated DNA substrates via the SRA domain, but also repressive H3K9me3 histone marks with its TTD. With systematic mutagenesis and functional assays, we could show that chromatin binding further involved UHRF1 PHD binding to unmodified H3R2. These complementation assays clearly demonstrated that the ubiquitin ligase activity of the UHRF1 RING domain is required for maintenance DNA methylation. Mass spectrometry of UHRF1-deficient cells revealed H3K18 as a novel ubiquitination target of UHRF1 in mammalian cells. With bioinformatics and mutational analyses, we identified a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) in the N-terminal regulatory domain of DNMT1 that binds to ubiquitinated H3 tails and is essential for DNA methylation in vivo. H3 ubiquitination and subsequent DNA methylation required UHRF1 PHD binding to H3R2. These results show the manifold regulatory mechanisms controlling DNMT1 activity that require the reading and writing of epigenetic marks by UHRF1 and illustrate the multifaceted interplay between DNA and histone modifications. The identification and functional characterization of the DNMT1 UIM suggests a novel regulatory principle and we speculate that histone H2AK119 ubiquitination might also lead to UIM-dependent recruitment of DNMT1 and DNA methylation beyond classic maintenance.     

Binding of histone H1 to DNA is described by an allosteric model

Equilibrium binding data were analyzed to characterize the interaction of the linker histone H1 degrees with unmodified T4 phage DNA. Data were cast into the Scatchard-type plot described by McGhee and von Hippel and fit to their eponymous model for nonspecific binding of ligand to DNA. The data were not fit by the simple McGhee-von Hippel model, nor fit satisfactorily by the inclusion of a cooperativity parameter. Instead, the interaction appeared to be well described by Crothers' allosteric model, in which the higher affinity of the protein for one conformational form of the DNA drives an allosteric transition of the DNA to the conformational form with higher affinity (form 2). At 214 mM Na(+), the observed affinity K for an isolated site on unmodified T4 bacteriophage DNA in the form 2 conformation is 4.5 x 10(7) M(-1). The binding constant for an isolated site on DNA in the conformation with lower affinity, form 1, appears to be about 10-fold lower. Binding affinity is dependent on ion concentration: the magnitude of K is about 10-fold higher at 14 mM (5.9 x 10(8) M(-1) for form 2 DNA) than at 214 mM Na(+) concentration.     

Histone H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation does not require ubiquitination of histone H2B

The yeast Set1-complex catalyzes histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation. Using N-terminal Edman sequencing, we determined that 50% of H3K4 is methylated and consists of roughly equal amounts of mono, di and tri-methylated H3K4. We further show that loss of either Paf1 of the Paf1 elongation complex, or ubiquitination of histone H2B, has only a modest effect on bulk histone mono-methylation at H3K4. Despite the fact that Set1 recruitment decreases in paf1delta cells, loss of Paf1 results in an increase of H3K4 mono-methylation at the 5' coding region of active genes, suggesting a Paf1-independent targeting of Set1. In contrast to Paf1 inactivation, deleting RTF1 affects H3K4 mono-methylation at the 3' coding region of active genes and results in a decrease of global H3K4 mono-methylation. Our results indicate that the requirements for mono-methylation are distinct from those for H3K4 di and tri-methylation, and point to differences among members of the Paf1 complex in the regulation of H3K4 methylation.     

NSD1 deposits histone H3 lysine 36 dimethylation to pattern non-CG DNA methylation in neurons

1. Download : Download high-res image (177KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Catalytic and non-catalytic mechanisms of histone H4 lysine 20 methyltransferase SUV420H1

1. Download : Download high-res image (214KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

G1 phase-dependent nucleolar accumulation of human histone H1x

Background information: H1 histones are a protein family comprising several subtypes. Although specific functions of the individual subtypes could not be determined so far, differential roles are indicated by varied nuclear distributions as well as differential expression patterns of the H1 subtypes. Although the group of replication‐dependent H1 subtypes is synthesized during S phase, the replacement H1 subtype, H1°, is also expressed in a replication‐independent manner in non‐proliferating cells. Recently we showed, by protein biochemical analysis, that the ubiquitously expressed subtype H1x is enriched in the micrococcal nuclease‐resistant part of chromatin and that, although it shares common features with H1°, its expression is differentially regulated, since, in contrast to H1°, growth arrest or induction of differentiation did not induce an accumulation of H1x. Results: In the present study, we show that H1x exhibits a cell‐cycle‐dependent change of its nuclear distribution. This H1 subtype showed a nucleolar accumulation during the G₁ phase, and it was evenly distributed in the nucleus during S phase and G₂. Immunocytochemical analysis of the intranucleolar distribution of H1x indicated that it is located mainly in the condensed nucleolar chromatin. In addition, we demonstrate that the amount of H1x protein remained nearly unchanged during S phase progression, which is in contrast to the replication‐dependent subtypes. Conclusion: These results suggest that the differential localization of H1x provides a mechanism for a control of H1x activity by means of shuttling between nuclear subcompartments instead of a controlled turnover of the protein.     

S phase-dependent interaction with DNMT1 dictates the role of UHRF1 but not UHRF2 in DNA methylation maintenance

Recent studies demonstrate that UHRF1 is required for DNA methylation maintenance by targeting DNMT1 to DNA replication foci, presumably through its unique hemi-methylated DNA-binding activity and interaction with DNMT1. UHRF2, another member of the UHRF family proteins, is highly similar to UHRF1 in both sequence and structure, raising questions about its role in DNA methylation. In this study, we demonstrate that, like UHRF1, UHRF2 also binds preferentially to methylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) through its conserved tudor domain and hemi-methylated DNA through the SET and Ring associated domain. Like UHRF1, UHRF2 is enriched in pericentric heterochromatin. The heterochromatin localization depends to large extent on its methylated H3K9-binding activity and to less extent on its methylated DNA-binding activity. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that both UHRF1 and UHRF2 interact with DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b and G9a. Despite all these conserved functions, we find that UHRF2 is not able to rescue the DNA methylation defect in Uhrf1 null mouse embryonic stem cells. This can be attributed to the inability for UHRF2 to recruit DNMT1 to replication foci during S phase of the cell cycle. Indeed, we find that while UHRF1 interacts with DNMT1 in an S phase-dependent manner in cells, UHRF2 does not. Thus, our study demonstrates that UHRF2 and UHRF1 are not functionally redundant in DNA methylation maintenance and reveals the cell-cycle-dependent interaction between UHRF1 and DNMT1 as a key regulatory mechanism targeting DNMT1 for DNA methylation.     

Biochemical fractionation reveals association of DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) 3b with Dnmt1 and that of Dnmt 3a with a histone H3 methyltransferase and Hdac1

De novo DNA methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and 3b, were purified by fractionation of S-100 extract from mouse lymphosarcoma cells through several chromatographic matrices followed by glycerol density gradient centrifugation. Dnmt3a was separated from Dnmt3b and Dnmt1 in the first column, Q-Sepharose whereas Dnmt3b co-purified with Dnmt1 after further fractionation through Mono-S and Mono-Q columns and glycerol density gradient centrifugation. Following purification, the majority of de novo DNA methyltransfearse activity was associated with Dnmt3b/Dnmt1 fractions. By contrast, the fractions containing Dnmt3a alone exhibited markedly reduced activity, which correlated with diminished expression of this isoform in these cells. Histone deacetylase 1(Hdac1) cofractionated with Dnmt3a throughout purification whereas Hdac1 was separated from Dnmt3b/Dnmt1 following chromatography on Mono-Q column. Dnmt3a purified through glycerol gradient centrifugation was also associated with a histone H3 methyltransferase (HMTase) activity whereas purified Dnmt3b/Dnmt1 was devoid of any HMTase activity. The activity of this HMTase was abolished when lysine 9 of N-terminal histone H3 peptide was replaced by leucine whereas mutation of lysine 4 to leucine inhibited this activity only partially. This is the first report on the identification of a few key co-repressors associated with endogenous Dnmt3a and of a complex containing Dnmt3b and a minor form of Dnmt1 following extensive biochemical fractionation.