不同包膜控释尿素对农田土壤氨挥发的影响

为了探索包膜控释尿素土壤氨挥发损失规律特征和提高肥料氮素利用率,采用小麦玉米轮作田间试验,通过与普通尿素进行对比,运用土壤氨挥发原位测定方法——通气法系统研究了硫包膜和树脂包膜控释尿素的施用对小麦玉米轮作农田土壤氨挥发的影响.研究结果表明:在两种施氮量水平下(210 kg/hm2和300 kg/hm2),与普通尿素相比,硫包膜和树脂包膜控释尿素在小麦基肥期、小麦追肥期和玉米施肥期的施用均减少了土壤氨挥发的累积损失量,分别达35.1％-54.3％、59.6％-75.2％、65.6％-98.1％;有效降低了土壤氨挥发通量峰值且延迟其出现时间3-8 d,并能延缓土壤氨挥发主要阶段的时间分别为4-12 d、5-12 d.在小麦玉米轮作周年中,控释尿素土壤氨挥发累积损失量为28.39-43.35 kg/hm2,土壤氨挥发损失率为4.48％-5.63％,控释尿素时段土壤氨挥发通量比普通尿素降低了51.0％-70.8％;且树脂包膜控释尿素的施用降低小麦玉米轮作农田土壤氨挥发的效果优于硫包膜控释尿素.     

控释尿素条施深度对鲜食玉米田间氨挥发和氮肥利用率的影响

为提高鲜食玉米一次性施肥的氮肥利用率并降低氮肥的环境影响,通过田间试验,以不施氮处理为对照(CK),研究了控释尿素不同条施深度(0、5、10、15、20 cm)对鲜食玉米田间土壤氨挥发特征、鲜穗产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 结果表明: 玉米种植带和宽行非施肥带的土壤氨挥发主要发生在施肥后的前2周,而窄行施肥带的土壤氨挥发在施肥后持续约1个月. 与CK相比,控释尿素表施(0 cm)处理不仅大幅度地提高了窄行施肥带的氨挥发损失量,同时也显著增加了玉米种植带和宽行非施肥带的氨挥发损失量. 不同深度施肥处理全生育期土壤氨挥发损失总量差异较大,为3.1～25.5 kg N·hm^-2,占施氮量的1.7%～14.2%.其中控释尿素条施10、15和20 cm深度处理的全生育期土壤氨挥发损失总量相差不大,分别较表施(0 cm)和浅施(5 cm)处理显著降低了85.9%～87.8%和67.0%～71.6%. 在一定范围内增加控释尿素条施深度有利于提高鲜穗产量、植株氮积累量以及氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学利用率和氮肥表观利用率,各指标均以15 cm深度处理最高. 综上所述,控释尿素合理深施可以显著降低氨挥发损失,提高鲜穗产量和氮肥利用效率,本研究条件下控释尿素的最适宜施用深度为15 cm.     

不同施肥与灌水量对槟榔土壤氨挥发的影响

利用通气法田间原位试验,研究了不同施肥模式、灌溉量对槟榔土壤氨挥发速率和挥发量的影响。结果表明：槟榔恢复期和出花期追肥灌水后,不同施肥处理均在第3天出现氨挥发速率峰值（0.50-3.42 kg.hm-2.d-1）,而后迅速下降并进入低挥发阶段。出花期氨挥发速率峰值（1.50-4.42 kg.hm-2.d-1）比恢复期氨挥发速率峰值明显高。灌水量小(300 m3. hm-2)的氨挥发率和总量比灌水量大(600 m3. hm-2)的明显减小。在同一氮水平下,有机质含量较低的氨挥发率较高。在同一有机质含量条件,氨挥发率随着N肥含量增加而升高。与单施N肥处理相比,有机肥与N肥配施可明显减少氨挥发速率和总量,可减少氮损失。     

三江平原典型小叶章湿地土壤氨挥发特征及影响因素

采用通气法对三江平原典型草甸小叶章湿地和沼泽化草甸小叶章湿地土壤的氨挥发进行了原位测定,并对其主要影响因素进行了分析。结果表明,二者的氨挥发速率在生长季内的变化趋势基本一致,7月中旬前出现两次挥发高峰和一次低值,之后整体呈严格单调下降趋势,后者的氨挥发速率较高,平均为前者的1.35±0.53倍;二者累计氨挥发量的变化趋势也基本一致,7月中旬前增加迅速,且值比较接近;之后增加缓慢,但其值发生明显分异,表现为后者大于前者;生长季内,典型草甸小叶章湿地土壤的氨挥发总量为6.35 kg N.hm-2,而沼泽化草甸小叶章湿地则为6.87 kg N.hm-2,二者之比为1∶1.08;氮素物质基础不是影响二者氨挥发过程的重要限制因素,大气温度及其所引起的其它温度波动是影响氨挥发速率变化的重要因素;降水及土壤水分波动与散失是引起氨挥发速率局部波动的重要原因;土壤pH和质地是导致氨挥发速率普遍较低的根本原因;而各种因素综合作用的结果则是引起二者氨挥发速率和氨挥发量变化及差异的主要原因。     

生物炭对农田土壤氨挥发的影响机制研究进展

降低土壤氨挥发量是农田生态系统中减少土壤氮素损失、提高氮肥利用率的关键途径之一。生物炭具有独特的理化性质,施入土壤后可改变土壤理化性状,影响土壤氮素循环,并对农田土壤中氨挥发产生重要的影响。本文首先介绍了稻田和旱田两种土地利用方式下农田氨挥发过程及其影响因素(气候条件、土壤环境、施肥管理等);其次,重点综述了生物炭对农田生态系统氨挥发影响的研究进展,并从物理吸附机制、气液平衡机制、生物化学过程调节机制等方面探讨了生物炭介入下农田土壤氨挥发的响应机制,认为土壤氨挥发减排的响应主要是基于生物炭表面含氧官能团对土壤NH₄⁺和NH₃的吸附作用及促进土壤硝化作用;而生物炭增加土壤氨挥发排放主要与生物炭提高土壤pH值和透气性、增强土壤有机氮矿化微生物活性有关。最后,对生物炭减少土壤氨挥发、提高氮肥利用率的研究方向进行了展望。     

不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响

采用田间试验,设置不施氮对照(CK)、常规施肥(U)、增效尿素(DU)、包膜尿素(CU)、缓控释掺混尿素(CDU)共5个处理,研究了常规施肥(240 kg N·hm^-2)和不同缓控释肥料一次性减量施用(180 kg N·hm^-2)对鲜食玉米产量、品质与土壤无机氮变化和氨挥发的影响。结果表明: U处理氨挥发总量最高,追肥是产生氨挥发损失的重要因素;与U处理相比,DU、CU、CDU处理氨挥发减排78%～81%。收获后U处理80～100 cm土层硝态氮浓度最高,为51.6 mg·kg^-1,氮淋溶风险较高,而DU、CU、CDU处理同土层硝态氮含量均较低,降低了淋溶风险。与U处理相比,减氮25%的3个缓控释肥处理没有减产,并增加了籽粒维生素C、可溶性糖和蛋白质含量;缓控释肥处理之间,DU处理的氮肥农学效率和经济效益最高。综上,减量施用新型缓控释肥可以实现鲜食玉米稳产提质,显著降低氨挥发损失和硝态氮淋失风险。与成本较高的树脂包膜控释肥相比,双效抑制剂增效肥(DU)成本低、制作便捷,是鲜食玉米专用肥的较好选择。     

施用南荻生物炭对不同类型土壤氨挥发的影响

在洞庭湖区农田施用秸秆生物炭不仅能实现秸秆资源化利用,还可降低环境污染压力。本研究于2020年采用水稻盆栽试验,研究了不同南荻秸秆生物炭施用量对土壤氨挥发速率、累积氨挥发量、表面水pH值和NH₄⁺-N浓度的影响。供试土壤为第四纪红土发育的红黄泥和花岗岩发育的麻砂泥水稻土,设置6个南荻秸秆生物炭添加处理,即分别以土柱0～20 cm土壤重量的0%、1%、2%、4%、6%和8%比例添加生物炭,每盆施用复合肥200 kg N·hm^-2。结果表明: 施用生物炭导致两种土壤之间或不同生物炭处理之间的氨挥发速率和累积量均存在显著差异。麻砂泥施用生物炭处理在施肥后第2天出现氨挥发峰值,且较不施生物炭处理峰值降低了23.6%～53.4%;红黄泥氨挥发峰值出现在施肥后第7～13天,且其峰值随着生物炭添加量的增加而升高。整体上,麻砂泥土壤的氨挥发速率均高于红黄泥。麻砂泥土壤＜4%生物炭添加量能抑制土壤氨挥发速率及累积量,其中以2%处理降幅最大(46.9%),但生物炭添加对水稻生长前期表面水pH值的影响不显著;红黄泥土壤随着南荻生物炭用量的增加,表面水中pH值和NH₄⁺-N浓度增加,导致氨挥发速率及累积量增幅达1.3～10.5倍。回归分析显示,生物炭添加量是影响两种土壤氨挥发的关键因素。Elo-vich方程能较好地拟合两种土壤的氨挥发累积量随时间的变化动态,各施炭处理的相关系数均达极显著水平。总体上,对于偏中性的麻砂泥土壤,施用一定量的南荻生物炭对氨排放有一定的抑制作用,而对于酸性的红黄泥土壤,增施南荻生物炭会通过提高表面水的pH值和NH₄⁺-N浓度促进氨挥发,因此针对不同类型土壤施用南荻秸秆生物炭应注意选择适宜用量,以降低氮素损失。     

施肥对巢湖流域稻季氨挥发损失的影响

采用通气法对巢湖流域稻季土壤氨挥发原位监测,研究了不同施肥量及秸秆还田处理对稻季氨挥发的影响。结果表明,氨挥发峰值发生在施肥后的第1-3 天,氨挥发损失主要集中于施肥后的1周。2010年整个稻季氨挥发净损失量为7.22-14.20 kg/hm²,占氮肥施用量的4.59%-6.64%,基肥期是主要的氨挥发时期,约占总氨挥发量的60%,穗肥期氨挥发总损失量最小。常规施肥处理氨挥发总损失量最大,与常规施肥相比,优化施肥、减量化施肥均能减少稻田土壤氨挥发损失1%-2%,氮磷肥减量同时秸秆还田处理氨挥发量最小,其总氨挥发量占常规处理的54%。施肥后的1-2d内田面水中的NH₄⁺-N浓度达到最大值,且各施肥处理的氨挥发量与同期田面水中的NH₄⁺-N浓度呈线性正相关。结合经济效益和环境效应分析发现,秸秆还田处理可减少氨挥发损失,同时获得较高的经济效益,适宜在巢湖流域水稻季推广。     

不同施肥模式下夏玉米田间土壤氨挥发规律

利用通气法田间原位试验,研究了不同施肥模式对夏玉米田间土壤氨挥发的影响.结果表明:单施化肥与秸秆还田配施化肥处理的田间氨挥发速率日变化与白天田间土壤表层温度(简称地温)变化表现基本一致,呈现由低到高的"单峰"趋势.夏玉米田间氨挥发损失的高峰期主要发生在白天11:00～13:00.但持续时间较短,单施化肥与秸秆还田配施化肥处理均在氮肥施入当天田间氨挥发速率达最高值,此后迅速降低,氨挥发损失主要集中于前7d,累计氨挥发量占总量的88.57%～96.72%.与单施化肥相比,秸秆还田配施化肥可显著减少氨挥发损失4.06～8.25 kg · hm-2,氨挥发损失率降低0.37%～1.17%.夏玉米大喇叭口期后对氮素需求较多,较高的田间土壤持水量均可以削弱氨挥发损失.确定适宜的秸秆与氮肥配比量,适量增加大喇叭口期的氮肥追施量配合及时浇水,是提高氮肥利用效率的有效途径之一.     

施氮水平对高产麦田土壤硝态氮时空变化及氨挥发的影响

研究了不同施氮水平对高产麦田土壤硝态氮时空变化和氨挥发的影响.结果表明,高产麦田土壤硝态氮在播种至冬前阶段不断向深层移动,并在140cm以下土层积累.施纯氮96～168 kg·hm^-2处理,增加了60 cm以上土层土壤硝态氮含量,降低了土壤氮素表观损失量占施氮量的比例,提高了小麦籽粒蛋白质含量和籽粒产量,且土壤氨挥发损失较低,基施氮氨挥发损失占基施氮量的4.23%～5.51%;施氮量超过240 kg N·hm^-2,促进了土壤硝态氮向深层的移动和积累,基施氮氨挥发损失、土壤氮素表观损失量及其占施氮量的比例均显著升高,对小麦籽粒蛋白质含量无显著影响,但籽粒产量降低.高产麦田适宜的氮素用量为132～204 kg N·hm^-2.     

Effect of phenylphosphorodiamidate on urea hydrolysis,ammonia volatilization and rice growth in an alkali soil

Summary In order to improve nitrogen recovery by rice, the effect of a urease inhibitor phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) on the efficiency of fertilizer urea was studied in laboratory and greenhouse. Addition of PPD to urea (5% w/w) delayed urea hydrolysis by 3 to 4 days and reduced ammonia volatilization from 45% (without PPD) to 8.5% (with PPD). Ammonia volatilization obeyed first order kinetics. Urea hydrolysis was sufficiently strongly inhibited to match the nitrification potential of the soil. N application to rice by three different modes showed that a delayed mode (4 splits) was superior to two conventional modes (3 splits) in nitrogen recovery and fertilizer efficiency since it met nitrogen requirement of plants at reproductive stage. In 2 out of 3 modes of application, there was a 14% increase (relative) in grain yields and dry matter, and 6.8% increase in N uptake efficiency on application of PPD along with urea. The results indicate that urease inhibitors like PPD can be effectively used to block urea hydrolysis, reduce ammonia volatilization losses and improve N use efficiency by rice.     

Ammonia volatilization losses from prilled urea,urea supergranules (USG) and coated USG in rice fields

Summary About 8.4 per cent of applied nitrogen was lost as ammonia during a week after application when prilled urea was broadcast or banded and incorporated in soil 20 days after sowing of rice. Ammonia volatilization was reduced to 3.3 per cent when urea supergranules (USG) were used. Coating of USG with DCD or neem cake showed no advantage. Ammonia volatilization was only 0.7 to 1.6 per cent when fertilizer was applied at panicle initiation stage of rice; highest values were again obtained with prilled urea. The experiments were carried out in closed cages.     

Effects of a slow-release urea source on absorption of ammonia and endogenous production of urea by cattle

Three experiments were conducted with Angus or Holstein steers to evaluate effects of dietary urea–calcium (a slow rumen-release urea source) on absorption of ammonia N from the gut and urea N production in the liver. Steers were fed a high-grain diet (Experiment 1) or an all-forage diet (Experiments 2 and 3). Urea or urea–calcium (0.25 g/kg body weight) was dosed into the esophagus (Experiments 1 and 2) or rumen (Experiment 3), and blood samples were serially collected for 180 min. Blood concentrations of ammonia N and urea N were measured in all experiments, and net flux of metabolites across splanchnic tissues was measured in Experiment 3. Compared to urea, urea–calcium reduced (P<0.05) plasma concentrations of ammonia N in steers fed all-forage diets, and tended (P<0.06) to reduce arterial glucose concentrations in Experiment 3. Plasma concentrations of urea N were not affected by treatment in any experiment. Treatment and time post-dosing interactions (P<0.05) in Experiment 3 were due to increased ruminal fluid concentrations of ammonia N, net release of ammonia N by portal-drained viscera and total splanchnic tissues with urea versus urea–calcium treatment shortly after dosing. Similar interactions (P<0.05) indicated that urea caused higher hepatic glucose release and increased l-lactate release by total splanchnic tissues after dosing than urea–calcium. Urea–calcium was effective in mitigating rapid ammonia release in the rumen and subsequent effects on glucose and lactate metabolism.     

Nitrification and ammonia volatilisation losses from urea and dicyandiamide-treated urea in a sandy loam soil

Summary Nitrification and ammonia volatilisation losses from urea and dicyandiamide (DCD)-treated urea were studied in a sandy loam soil. Laboratory experiments indicated that 20 ppm (of soil) DCD effectively inhibited nitrification of urea over sixty days. If the urea was treated with DCD (20 ppm), ammonia emission from the soil was extended over 105 days; with urea alone, it was negligible after 15 days. A field study indicated that DCD treatment increased volatilisation losses of ammonia tremondously if urea was applied to the soil surface; these losses were minimised if the urea was placed at 5 cm depth. It would seem that nitrification inhibitors must be combined with a placement technique.     

不同施肥方式对土壤氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放的影响

采用密闭室间歇通气法和静态箱法对不同施肥方式(撒施后翻耕、条施后覆土、撒施后灌水)下的土壤氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放进行了研究.结果表明:不同施肥方式显著影响了土壤中的氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放.撒施后灌水处理明显促进了氨挥发,其最大氨挥发速率明显高于其它处理,氨挥发累计达2.465 kg N·hm-2.不同施肥方式下氧化亚氮排放通量存在显著差异(P《0.05),且峰值出现时间也不同.施肥后第2天,撒施后灌水处理达到峰值,为193.66 μg·m-2·h-1,而条施后覆土处理在施肥后第5天才出现峰值,为51.13 μg·m-2·h-1,且其排放峰值在3种施肥方式中最低.撒施后灌水处理的氧化亚氮累积净排放量达121.55 g N·hm-2,显著大于撒施后翻耕和条施后覆土处理.撒施后翻耕和条施后覆土处理能有效抑制氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放损失,是较为合理的施肥方式.     

几种控释氮肥减少氨挥发的效果及影响因素研究

采用“静态吸收法”和“土柱淋溶法”、室内模拟试验,研究几种控释氮肥施入土壤后的氨挥发损失情况、N溶出速率、土壤脲酶活性及pH值变化的关系．结果表明,施氮450mg·kg^-1土时,3种控释氮肥氨挥发损失氮总量分别比普通尿素减少49．7％、28．0％和71．2％;施氮600mg·kg^-1土时,3种控释氮肥氨挥发损失氮总量分别比普通尿素减少34．6％、12．3％和69．9％．控释氮肥能显著降低土壤氨挥发量,减少因施肥而引起的大气环境污染．控释氮肥氨挥发量与不同氮肥引起的土壤脲酶活性、pH值、土壤中氮溶出速率密切相关．土壤的氨挥发总量与肥料在土壤中溶出总量的相关系数达到0．9533,在肥料施入的前期土壤氨挥发量同土壤脲酶活性、pH值的相关系数达到0．9533和0．9908。     

Effects of addition of calcium and magnesium salts on ammonia volatilization during manure decomposition

Ammonia volatilization during aerobic decomposition of poultry manure was significantly reduced through additions of calcium and magnesium salts. The percentage reduction in ammonia loss decreased during the 48 day decomposition period from 85–100% in the first 2–3 weeks, to 23–52% at the end of the experiment. The maximum amount of ammonia which was retained (i.e. maximum reduction in ammonia loss) through addition of the chloride salts of Mg²⁺ or Ca²⁺ was independent of the type of cation. However, CaCl₂ released some of the ammonia initially retained as production of CO₂ and NH₃ from the manure decreased after 3 weeks of decomposition, whereas both MgCl₂ and MgSO₄ did not release any of the initially retained ammonia over the 7 week incubation period. Over the entire incubation period MgCl₂ therefore retained more ammonia than CaCl₂. Magnesium sulphate was considerably less effective in retaining ammonia than either chloride salts.