Membrane targeting of C2 domains of phospholipase C-delta isoforms.

The C2 domain is a Ca(2+)-dependent membrane-targeting module found in many cellular proteins involved in signal transduction or membrane trafficking. To understand the mechanisms by which the C2 domain mediates the membrane targeting of PLC-delta isoforms, we measured the in vitro membrane binding of the C2 domains of PLC-delta1, -delta3, and -delta4 by surface plasmon resonance and monolayer techniques and their subcellular localization by time-lapse confocal microscopy. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta1-C2 is driven by nonspecific electrostatic interactions between the Ca(2+)-induced cationic surface of protein and the anionic membrane and specific interactions involving Ca(2+), Asn(647), and phosphatidylserine (PS). The PS selectivity of PLC-delta1-C2 governs its specific Ca(2+)-dependent subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta3-C2 also involves Ca(2+)-induced nonspecific electrostatic interactions and PS coordination, and the latter leads to specific subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. In contrast to PLC-delta1-C2 and PLC-delta3-C2, PLC-delta4-C2 has significant Ca(2+)-independent membrane affinity and no PS selectivity due to the presence of cationic residues in the Ca(2+)-binding loops and the substitution of Ser for the Ca(2+)-coordinating Asp in position 717. Consequently, PLC-delta4-C2 exhibits unique pre-localization to the plasma membrane prior to Ca(2+) import and non-selective Ca(2+)-mediated targeting to various cellular membranes, suggesting that PLC-delta4 might have a novel regulatory mechanism. Together, these results establish the C2 domains of PLC-delta isoforms as Ca(2+)-dependent membrane targeting domains that have distinct membrane binding properties that control their subcellular localization behaviors.     

Comparative analysis of two C-terminal kinesin motor proteins: KIFC1 and KIFC5A

We have taken advantage of the close structural relationship between two C-terminal motors, KIFC5A and KIFC1, to examine the sequence requirements for targeting of these two motors within the cell. Although KIFC5A and KIFC1 are almost identical in their motor and stalk domains, they differ in well-defined regions of their tail domains. Specific antisera to these motors were used to determine their localization to distinct subcellular compartments, the spindle for KIFC5A or membranous organelles for KIFC1. In addition to defining the intracellular localization of KIFC1, the reactivity of the KIFC1 antibody demonstrates that this motor contains a frame shift with respect to KIFC5A and is likely the product of a separate gene. The divergent tail domains of these motors are predicted to harbor specific information that directs them to their correct intracellular targets. In order to define the sequences responsible for the differential localization of these two motors, GFP was fused to motors with various tail deletions and their localization visualized after transfection. We were able to identify distinct sequences in each motor responsible for its unique cellular localization. The KIFC5A tail contains a 43 amino acid sequence with both nuclear localization and microtubule binding activity while KIFC1 contains a 19 amino acid sequence sufficient to target this motor to membrane-bounded organelles.     

Characterization of RanBPM Molecular Determinants that Control Its Subcellular Localization

RanBPM/RanBP9 is a ubiquitous, nucleocytoplasmic protein that is part of an evolutionary conserved E3 ubiquitin ligase complex whose function and targets in mammals are still unknown. RanBPM itself has been implicated in various cellular processes that involve both nuclear and cytoplasmic functions. However, to date, little is known about how RanBPM subcellular localization is regulated. We have conducted a systematic analysis of RanBPM regions that control its subcellular localization using RanBPM shRNA cells to examine ectopic RanBPM mutant subcellular localization without interference from the endogenously expressed protein. We show that several domains and motifs regulate RanBPM nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. In particular, RanBPM comprises two motifs that can confer nuclear localization, one proline/glutamine-rich motif in the extreme N-terminus which has a dominant effect on RanBPM localization, and a second motif in the C-terminus which minimally contributes to RanBPM nuclear targeting. We also identified a nuclear export signal (NES) which mutation prevented RanBPM accumulation in the cytoplasm. Likewise, deletion of the central RanBPM conserved domains (SPRY and LisH/CTLH) resulted in the relocalization of RanBPM to the nucleus, suggesting that RanBPM cytoplasmic localization is also conferred by protein-protein interactions that promote its cytoplasmic retention. Indeed we found that in the cytoplasm, RanBPM partially colocalizes with microtubules and associates with α-tubulin. Finally, in the nucleus, a significant fraction of RanBPM is associated with chromatin. Altogether, these analyses reveal that RanBPM subcellular localization results from the combined effects of several elements that either confer direct transport through the nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery or regulate it indirectly, likely through interactions with other proteins and by intramolecular folding.     

Palmitoylation of stathmin family proteins domain A controls Golgi versus mitochondrial subcellular targeting

Background information. Precise localization of proteins to specialized subcellular domains is fundamental for proper neuronal development and function. The neural microtubule‐regulatory phosphoproteins of the stathmin family are such proteins whose specific functions are controlled by subcellular localization. Whereas stathmin is cytosolic, SCG10, SCLIP and RB3/RB3′/RB3″ are localized to the Golgi and vesicle‐like structures along neurites and at growth cones. We examined the molecular determinants involved in the regulation of this specific subcellular localization in hippocampal neurons in culture. Results. We show that their conserved N‐terminal domain A carrying two palmitoylation sites is dominant over the others for Golgi and vesicle‐like localization. Using palmitoylation‐deficient GFP (green fluorescent protein) fusion mutants, we demonstrate that domains A of stathmin proteins have the particular ability to control protein targeting to either Golgi or mitochondria, depending on their palmitoylation. This regulation involves the co‐operation of two subdomains within domain A, and seems also to be under the control of its SLD (stathmin‐like domain) extension. Conclusions. Our results unravel that, in specific biological conditions, palmitoylation of stathmin proteins might be able to control their targeting to express their functional activities at appropriate subcellular sites. They, more generally, open new perspectives regarding the role of palmitoylation as a signalling mechanism orienting proteins to their functional subcellular compartments.     

NOM1 targets protein phosphatase I to the nucleolus

Protein phosphatase I (PP1) is an essential eukaryotic serine/threonine phosphatase required for many cellular processes, including cell division, signaling, and metabolism. In mammalian cells there are three major isoforms of the PP1 catalytic subunit (PP1alpha, PP1beta, and PP1gamma) that are over 90% identical. Despite this high degree of identity, the PP1 catalytic subunits show distinct localization patterns in interphase cells; PP1alpha is primarily nuclear and largely excluded from nucleoli, whereas PP1gamma and to a lesser extent PP1beta concentrate in the nucleoli. The subcellular localization and the substrate specificity of PP1 catalytic subunits are determined by their interaction with targeting subunits, most of which bind PP1 through a so-called "RVXF" sequence. Although PP1 targeting subunits have been identified that direct PP1 to a number of subcellular locations and/or substrates, no targeting subunit has been identified that localizes PP1 to the nucleolus. Identification of nucleolar PP1 targeting subunit(s) is important because all three PP1 isoforms are included in the nucleolar proteome, enzymatically active PP1 is present in nucleoli, and PP1gamma is highly concentrated in nucleoli of interphase cells. In this study, we identify NOM1 (nucleolar protein with MIF4G domain 1) as a PP1-interacting protein and further identify the NOM1 RVXF motif required for its binding to PP1. We also define the NOM1 nucleolar localization sequence. Finally, we demonstrate that NOM1 can target PP1 to the nucleolus and show that a specific NOM1 RVXF motif and the NOM1 nucleolar localization sequence are required for this targeting activity. We therefore conclude that NOM1 is a PP1 nucleolar targeting subunit, the first identified in eukaryotic cells.     

Regulation of the enzymatic and motor activities of myosin I

Myosins I were the first unconventional myosins to be purified and they remain the best characterized. They have been implicated in various motile processes, including organelle translocation, ion channel gating and cytoskeletal reorganization but their exact cellular functions are still unclear. All members of the myosin I family, from yeast to man, have three structural domains: a catalytic head domain that binds ATP and actin; a tail domain believed to be involved in targeting the myosins to specific subcellular locations and a junction or neck domain that connects them and interacts with light chains. In this review we discuss how each of these three domains contributes to the regulation of myosin I enzymatic activity, motor activity and subcellular localization.     

The molecular basis of the differential subcellular localization of FYVE domains

This study systematically analyzed the structural and mechanistic basis of the regulation of subcellular membrane targeting using FYVE domains as a model. FYVE domains, which mediate the recruitment of signaling and membrane-trafficking proteins to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-containing endosomes, exhibit distinct subcellular localization despite minor structural variations within the family. Biophysical measurements, cellular imaging, and computational analysis of various FYVE domains showed that the introduction of a single cationic residue and a hydrophobic loop into the membrane binding region of the FYVE domains dramatically enhanced their membrane interactions. The results indicated that there is a threshold affinity for endosomal localization and that endosomal targeting of FYVE domains is sensitive to small changes in membrane affinity about this threshold. Collectively these studies provide new insight into how subcellular localization of FYVE domains and other membrane targeting domains can be regulated by minimal structural and environmental changes.     

Both the hydrophobicity and a positively charged region flanking the C-terminal region of the transmembrane domain of signal-anchored proteins play critical roles in determining their targeting specificity to the endoplasmic reticulum or endosymbiotic organelles in Arabidopsis cells

Proteins localized to various cellular and subcellular membranes play pivotal roles in numerous cellular activities. Accordingly, in eukaryotic cells, the biogenesis of organellar proteins is an essential process requiring their correct localization among various cellular and subcellular membranes. Localization of these proteins is determined by either cotranslational or posttranslational mechanisms, depending on the final destination. However, it is not fully understood how the targeting specificity of membrane proteins is determined in plant cells. Here, we investigate the mechanism by which signal-anchored (SA) proteins are differentially targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or endosymbiotic organelles using in vivo targeting, subcellular fractionation, and bioinformatics approaches. For targeting SA proteins to endosymbiotic organelles, the C-terminal positively charged region (CPR) flanking the transmembrane domain (TMD) is necessary but not sufficient. The hydrophobicity of the TMD in CPR-containing proteins also plays a critical role in determining targeting specificity; TMDs with a hydrophobicity value >0.4 on the Wimley and White scale are targeted primarily to the ER, whereas TMDs with lower values are targeted to endosymbiotic organelles. Based on these data, we propose that the CPR and the hydrophobicity of the TMD play a critical role in determining the targeting specificity between the ER and endosymbiotic organelles.     

Regulation of ROS signal transduction by NADPH oxidase 4 localization

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as intracellular signaling molecules in a diverse range of biological processes. However, it is unclear how freely diffusible ROS dictate specific cellular responses. In this study, we demonstrate that nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced oxidase 4 (Nox4), a major Nox isoform expressed in nonphagocytic cells, including vascular endothelium, is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). ER localization of Nox4 is critical for the regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) 1B, also an ER resident, through redox-mediated signaling. Nox4-mediated oxidation and inactivation of PTP1B in the ER serves as a regulatory switch for epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor trafficking and specifically acts to terminate EGF signaling. Consistent with this notion, PTP1B oxidation could also be modulated by ER targeting of antioxidant enzymes but not their untargeted counterparts. These data indicate that the specificity of intracellular ROS-mediated signal transduction may be modulated by the localization of Nox isoforms within specific subcellular compartments.     

Distinct roles of TIR and non-TIR regions in the subcellular localization and signaling properties of MyD88

MyD88 is a cytoplasmic adaptor protein that is critical for Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling. The subcellular localization of MyD88 is characterized as large condensed forms in the cytoplasm. The mechanism and significance of this localization with respect to the signaling function, however, are currently unknown. Here, we demonstrate that MyD88 localization depends on the entire non-TIR region and that the correct cellular targeting of MyD88 is indispensable for its signaling function. The Toll-interleukin I receptor-resistance (TIR) domain does not determine the subcellular localization, but it mediates interaction with specific TLRs. These findings reveal distinct roles for the TIR and non-TIR regions in the subcellular localization and signaling properties of MyD88.     

Protein localization as a principal feature of the etiology and comorbidity of genetic diseases

Proteins targeting the same subcellular localization tend to participate in mutual protein–protein interactions (PPIs) and are often functionally associated. Here, we investigated the relationship between disease‐associated proteins and their subcellular localizations, based on the assumption that protein pairs associated with phenotypically similar diseases are more likely to be connected via subcellular localization. The spatial constraints from subcellular localization significantly strengthened the disease associations of the proteins connected by subcellular localizations. In particular, certain disease types were more prevalent in specific subcellular localizations. We analyzed the enrichment of disease phenotypes within subcellular localizations, and found that there exists a significant correlation between disease classes and subcellular localizations. Furthermore, we found that two diseases displayed high comorbidity when disease‐associated proteins were connected via subcellular localization. We newly explained 7584 disease pairs by using the context of protein subcellular localization, which had not been identified using shared genes or PPIs only. Our result establishes a direct correlation between protein subcellular localization and disease association, and helps to understand the mechanism of human disease progression.     

Conserved and clustered RNA recognition sequences are a critical feature of signals directing RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes

Although it is widely regarded that the targeting of RNA molecules to subcellular destinations depends upon the recognition of cis-elements found within their 3' untranslated regions (UTR), relatively little is known about the specific features of these cis-sequences that underlie their function. Interaction between specific repeated motifs within the 3' UTR and RNA-binding proteins has been proposed as a critical step in the localization of Vg1 RNA to the vegetal pole of Xenopus oocytes. To understand the relative contributions of repeated localization element (LE) sequences, we used comparative functional analysis of Vg1 LEs from two frog species, Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis. We show that clusters of repeated VM1 and E2 motifs are required for efficient localization. However, groups of either site alone are not sufficient for localization. In addition, we present evidence that the X. borealis Vg1 LE is recognized by the same set of RNA-binding proteins as the X. laevis Vg1 LE and is capable of productive interactions with the X. laevis transport machinery as it is sufficient to direct vegetal localization in X. laevis oocytes. These results suggest that clustered sets of cis-acting sites within the LE direct vegetal transport through specific interactions with the localization machinery.     

Ultrastructural detection of photosensitizing molecules by fluorescence photoconversion of diaminobenzidine

Photodynamic therapy is a moderately invasive therapeutic procedure based on the action of photosensitizers (PSs). These compounds are able to absorb light, and dissipate energy through photochemical processes leading to the production of oxidizing chemical species (singlet oxygen, free radicals or reactive oxygen species) which can damage the cell molecular structures eventually inducing cell death. To increase the entering through the plasma membrane, a PS with suitable chemical structure can be modified by addition of chemical groups (e.g., acetate or phosphate): this affects both the fluorescence emission and of the photosensitizing properties of the native PS. The modified compounds behave as fluorogenic substrates (FSs), since inside the cell the bound groups can be enzymatically removed and the fluorescence and photosensitizing properties of the native molecules are restored. With the aim to detect the subcellular localization of photoactive molecules at transmission electron microscopy, we loaded cultured HeLa cells with two different FSs, Rose Bengal acetate (RB-Ac) or Hypocrellin B acetate (HypB-Ac), and took advantage of the photophysical properties of the intracellularly restored PS molecules to obtain the photoconversion of diaminobenzidine (DAB) into an electrondense product. We demonstrated that RB-Ac and HypB-Ac are mostly internalized by endocytosis, and are converted into the native PSs already at the cell surface. Endocytosed PS molecules apparently follow the endosomes–lysosome route, being found in endosomes, lysosomes and multivescicular bodies; PS molecules were also detected in the cytosol. This ultrastructural localization of the photoactive molecules is fully consistent with the multiorganelle photodamage observed after irradiation in culture of RB-Ac- or HypB-Ac-loaded cells. Due to the very short half-life of the oxidizing chemical species and their limited mobility, DAB deposits do localize in close proximity of the very place where photoactive molecules elicited the production of reactive oxygen species upon light irradiation. Therefore, DAB photoconversion promises to be a suitable tool for directly visualizing in single cells the PS molecules at high resolution, helping to elucidate their mode of penetration into the cell as well as their dynamic intracellular redistribution and organelle targeting.     

Identification of a VxP Targeting Signal in the Flagellar Na+/K+‐ATPase

Na⁺/K⁺‐ATPase (NKA) participates in setting electrochemical gradients, cardiotonic steroid signaling and cellular adhesion. Distinct isoforms of NKA are found in different tissues and subcellular localization patterns. For example, NKA α1 is widely expressed, NKA α3 is enriched in neurons and NKA α4 is a testes‐specific isoform found in sperm flagella. In some tissues, ankyrin, a key component of the membrane cytoskeleton, can regulate the trafficking of NKA. In the retina, NKA and ankyrin‐B are expressed in multiple cell types and immunostaining for each is striking in the synaptic layers. Labeling for NKA is also prominent along the inner segment plasma membrane (ISPM) of photoreceptors. NKA co‐immunoprecipitates with ankyrin‐B, but on a subcellular level colocalization of these two proteins varies dependent on the cell type. We used transgenic Xenopus laevis tadpoles to evaluate the subcellular trafficking of NKA in photoreceptors. GFP‐NKA α3 and α1 are localized to the ISPM, but α4 is localized to outer segments (OSs). We identified a VxP motif responsible for the OS targeting by using a series of chimeric and mutant NKA constructs. This motif is similar to previously identified ciliary targeting motifs. Given the structural similarities between OSs and flagella, our findings shed light on the subcellular targeting of this testes‐specific NKA isoform.      

Subcellular localization of PS1 based on PS1/GFP fusing protein

Mutations in presenilin 1 (PS1) gene are closely associated with the early onset of familial Alzheimer’s disease (EOFAD). The fusion genes, GFPPS1 (recombinant plasmid pEGFP-C1-PS1) and PS1-GFP (recombinant plasmid pEGFP-N2-PS1) were constructed to study the subcellular localization of PS1 holoprotein. Recombinant plasmids were transiently transfected into two cell lines, HEK293 and CHO, respectively, using the green fluorescence from GFP (green fluorescence protein) as the PS1 localization signal. Then, we observed green fluorescence with a SPOT II (Olympus, BH2) and CONFOCAL microscope (Olympus, FV300) under 488 nm. The results show that PS1 located on the nuclear envelope. A few can be found on the cellular membrane and in the cytosol in a non-homogeneous distribution. __________ Translated from China Biotechnology, 2006, 26(6): 17-22 [译自: 中 国生物工程杂志]     

Utilizing chimeric proteins for exploring the cellular fate of endogenous proteins.

We recently designed and constructed chimeric proteins for the elimination of specific cell populations. These chimeric proteins are composed of a targeting component fused to an apoptotic protein as the killing moiety. However, chimeric proteins can serve not only to eliminate cell populations, but also as "biological tools" for studying the fate of endogenous proteins. We show here that upon entering their target cell, a variety of chimeric proteins composed of an endogenous protein as their killing moiety reach the subcellular location of their endogenous counterpart. In contrast, bacterial-based killing domains head for the subcellular site of their substrate. Moreover, the chimeric protein acts similarly to the endogenous protein, while causing the cell to die. Therefore, chimeric proteins may serve as a unique tool for investigating cellular proteins and their intracellular localization, without the need to overexpress them.     

The molecular basis of differential subcellular localization of C2 domains of protein kinase C-alpha and group IVa cytosolic phospholipase A2

The C2 domain is a Ca(2+)-dependent membrane-targeting module found in many cellular proteins involved in signal transduction or membrane trafficking. C2 domains are unique among membrane targeting domains in that they show a wide range of lipid selectivity for the major components of cell membranes, including phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylcholine. To understand how C2 domains show diverse lipid selectivity and how this functional diversity affects their subcellular targeting behaviors, we measured the binding of the C2 domains of group IVa cytosolic phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)) and protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-alpha) to vesicles that model cell membranes they are targeted to, and we monitored their subcellular targeting in living cells. The surface plasmon resonance analysis indicates that the PKC-alpha C2 domain strongly prefers the cytoplasmic plasma membrane mimic to the nuclear membrane mimic due to high phosphatidylserine content in the former and that Asn(189) plays a key role in this specificity. In contrast, the cPLA(2) C2 domain has specificity for the nuclear membrane mimic over the cytoplasmic plasma membrane mimic due to high phosphatidylcholine content in the former and aromatic and hydrophobic residues in the calcium binding loops of the cPLA(2) C2 domain are important for its lipid specificity. The subcellular localization of enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged C2 domains and mutants transfected into HEK293 cells showed that the subcellular localization of the C2 domains is consistent with their lipid specificity and could be tailored by altering their in vitro lipid specificity. The relative cell membrane translocation rate of selected C2 domains was also consistent with their relative affinity for model membranes. Together, these results suggest that biophysical principles that govern the in vitro membrane binding of C2 domains can account for most of their subcellular targeting properties.     

CBL‐mediated targeting of CIPKs facilitates the decoding of calcium signals emanating from distinct cellular stores

During adaptation and developmental processes cells respond through nonlinear calcium‐decoding signaling cascades, the principal components of which have been identified. However, the molecular mechanisms generating specificity of cellular responses remain poorly understood. Calcineurin B‐like (CBL) proteins contribute to decoding calcium signals by specifically interacting with a group of CBL‐interacting protein kinases (CIPKs). Here, we report the subcellular localization of all 10 CBL proteins from Arabidopsis and provide a cellular localization matrix of a plant calcium signaling network. Our findings suggest that individual CBL proteins decode calcium signals not only at the plasma membrane and the tonoplast, but also in the cytoplasm and nucleus. We found that distinct targeting signals located in the N‐terminal domain of CBL proteins determine the spatially discrete localization of CBL/CIPK complexes by COPII‐independent targeting pathways. Our findings establish the CBL/CIPK signaling network as a calcium decoding system that enables the simultaneous specific information processing of calcium signals emanating from different intra‐ and extracellular stores, and thereby provides a mechanism underlying the specificity of cellular responses.     

Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing mcherry-fused organelle marker proteins

In eukaryotic cells, a major proportion of the cellular proteins localize to various subcellular organelles where they are involved in organelle-specific cellular processes. Thus, the localization of a particular protein in the cell is an important part of understanding the physiological role of the protein in the cell. Various approaches such as subcellular fractionation, immunolocalization and live imaging have been used to define the localization of organellar proteins. Of these various approaches, the most powerful one is the live imaging because it can show in vivo dynamics of protein localization depending on cellular and environmental conditions without disturbing cellular structures. However, the live imaging requires the ability to detect the organelles in live cells. In this study, we report generation of a new set of transgenic Arabidopsis plants using various organelle marker proteins fused to a fluorescence protein, monomeric Cherry (mCherry). All these markers representing different subcellular organelles such as chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and lytic vacuole showed clear and specific signals regardless of the cell types and tissues. These marker lines can be used to determine localization of organellar proteins by colocalization and also to study the dynamics of organelles under various developmental and environmental conditions.