The structure of rat 28S ribosomal ribonucleic acid inferred from the sequence of nucleotides in a gene.

The nucleotide sequence of a rat 28S rRNA gene was determined. The 28S rRNA encoded in the gene contains 4718 nucleotides and the molecular weight estimated from the sequence is 1.53 x 10(6). The guanine and cytosine content is 67%. The sequence of rat 28S rRNA diverges appreciably from that of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis 26S rRNA (about 50% identity), but more closely approximates that of Xenopus laevis 28S rRNA (about 75% identity). Rat 28S rRNA is larger than the analogous nucleic acids from yeast (3393 nucleotides) and X, laevis (4110 nucleotides) ribosomes. The additional bases are inserted in specific regions and tend to be rich in guanine and cytosine. 5.8S rRNA can interact with 28S rRNA by extensive hydrogen bonding at two sites near the 5' end of the latter.     

The nucleotide sequences of 5.8-S ribosomal RNA from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis

1. The nucleotide sequence of 5.8-S rRNA from Xenopus laevis is given; it differs by a C in equilibrium U transition at position 140 from the 5.8-S rRNA of Xenopus borealis. 2. The sequence contains two completely modified and two partially modified residues. 3. Three different 5' nucleotides are found: pU-C-G (0.4) pC-G (0.2) and pG (0.4). 4. The 3' terminus is C not U as in all other 5.8-S sequences so far determined. 5. The X. laevis sequence differs from the mammalian and turtle sequences by five and six residue changes respectively. 6. A ribonuclease-resistant hairpin loop is a principle feature of secondary structure models proposed for this molecule. 7. Sequence heterogeneity may occur at one position at a very low level (approximately 0.01) in X. laevis 5.8-S rRNA, while none was detected in X. borealis or HeLa cell 5.8-S rRNA.     

Extensive homologies between the methylated nucleotide sequences in several vertebrate ribosomal ribonucleic acids.

The methylated nucleotide sequences in the rRNA molecules of the following vertebrate cultured cells were compared: human (HeLa); hamster (BHK/C13); mouse (L); chick-embryo fibroblast; Xenopus laevis kidney. In each species the combined 18S, 28S and 5.8S molecules possess approx. 110-115 methyl groups, and the methylated oligonucleotides released after complete digestion of the rRNA by T1 ribonuclease encompass several hundred nucleotides. "Fingerprints" of the three mammalian methyl-labelled 18S rRNA species were qualitatively indistinguishable. "Fingerprints" of digests of 28S rRNA of hamster and mouse L-cells were extremely similar to those of HeLa cells, differing in one and three methylated oligonucleotides respectively. "Fingerprints" of methyl-labelled rRNA from chick and Xenopus strongly resembled those of mammals in most respects, but differed in several oligonucleotides in both 18S and 28S rRNA. At least some of the differences between "fingerprints" appear to be due to single base changes or to the presence or absence of methyl groups at particular points in the primary sequence. The findings strongly suggest that the methylated-nucleotide sequences are at least 95% homologous between the rRNA molecules of the two most distantly related vertebrates compared, man and Xenopus laevis.     

Independent binding sites in mouse 5.8S ribosomal ribonucleic acid for 28S ribosomal ribonucleic acid

Limited digestion of mouse 5.8S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) with RNase T2 generates 5'- and 3'-terminal "half-molecules". These fragments are capable of independently and specifically binding to 28S rRNA, so there exist at least two contacts in the 5.8S rRNA for the 28S rRNA. The dissociation constants for the 5.8S/28S, 5' 5.8S fragment/28S, and 3' 5.8S fragment/28S complexes are 9 x 10(-8) M, 6 x 10(-8) M, and 13 x 10(-8) M, respectively. Thus, each of the fragment binding sites contributes about equally to the overall binding energy of the 5.8S/28S rRNA complex, and the binding sites act independently, rather than cooperatively. The dissociation constants suggest that the 5.8S rRNA termini from short, irregular helices with 28S rRNA. Thermal denaturation data on complexes containing 28S rRNA and each of the half-molecules of 5.8S rRNA indicate that the 5'-terminal binding site(s) exist(s) in a single conformation while the 3'-terminal site exhibits two conformational alternatives. The functional significance of the different conformational states is presently indeterminate, but the possibility they may represent alternative forms of a conformational switch operative during ribosome function is discussed.     

Nucleotide sequence relationships between vertebrate 5.8 S ribosomal RNAs.

Nucleotide sequences of the 5.8 S ribosomal RNAs from HeLa cells, Xenopus laevis and chick embryo fibroblasts were compared. Xenopus laevis 5.8 S RNA differs from that of HeLa cells in four internal positions and at the 3' end of the molecule. Chick 5.8 S RNA differs from that of HeLa cells in two positions. Six out of the seven interspecies differences are due to base substitutions. The other difference is due to the presence of an extra nucleotide, internally located, within the Xenopus 5.8 S sequence.     

Effect of point mutations on 5.8S ribosomal ribonucleic acid secondary structure and the 5.8S--28S ribosomal ribonucleic acid junction

Naturally occurring differences in the nucleotide sequences of 5.8S ribosomal ribonucleic acids (rRNAs) from a variety of organisms have been used to study the role of specific nucleotides in the secondary structure and intermolecular interactions of this RNA. Significant differences in the electrophoretic mobilities of free 5.8S RNAs and the thermal stabilities of 5.8S--28S rRNA complexes were observed even in such closely related sequences as those of man, rat, turtle, and chicken. A single base transition from a guanylic acid residue in position 2 in mammalian 5.8S rRNA to an adenylic acid residue in turtle and chicken 5.8S rRNA results both in a more open molecular conformation and in a 5.8S--28S rRNA junction which is 3.5 degrees C more stable to thermal denaturation. Other changes such as the deletion of single nucleotides from either the 5' or the 3' terminals have no detectable effect on these features. The results support secondary structure models for free 5.8S rRNA in which the termini interact to various degrees and 5.8S--28S rRNA junctions in which both termini of the 5.8S molecule interact with the cognate high molecular weight RNA component.     

Identification by affinity chromatography of the eukaryotic ribosomal proteins that bind to 5.8 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid.

The proteins that bind to rat liver 5.8 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid were identified by affinity chromatography. The nucleic acid was oxidized with periodate and coupled by its 3'-terminus to Sepharose 4B through and adipic acid dihydrazide spacer. The ribosomal proteins that associate with the immobilized 5.8 S rRNA were identified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresiss: they were L19, L8, and L6 from the 60 S subunit; and S13 and S9 from the small subparticle. Small amounts of L14, L17', L18, L27/L27', and L35', and of S11, S15, S23/S24, and S26 also were bound to the affinity column, but whether they associate directly and specifically with 5.8 S rRNA is not known. Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins did not bind to the rat liver 5.8 S rRNA affinity column.     

Structure of the ribosome-associated 5.8 S ribosomal RNA

The structure of the 5.8 S ribosomal RNA in rat liver ribosomes was probed by comparing dimethyl sulfate-reactive sites in whole ribosomes, 60 S subunits, the 5.8 S-28 S rRNA complex and the free 5.8 S rRNA under conditions of salt and temperature that permit protein synthesis in vitro. Differences in reactive sites between the free and both the 28 S rRNA and 60 S subunit-associated 5.8 S rRNA show that significant conformational changes occur when the molecule interacts with its cognate 28 S rRNA and as the complex is further integrated into the ribosomal structure. These results indicate that, as previously suggested by phylogenetic comparisons of the secondary structure, only the "G + C-rich" stem may remain unaltered and a universal structure is probably present only in the whole ribosome or 60 S subunit. Further comparisons with the ribosome-associated molecule indicate that while the 5.8 S rRNA may be partly localized in the ribosomal interface, four cytidylic acid residues, C56, C100, C127 and C128, remain reactive even in whole ribosomes. In contrast, the cytidylic acid residues in the 5 S rRNA are not accessible in either the 60 S subunit or the intact ribosome. The nature of the structural rearrangements and potential sites of interaction with the 28 S rRNA and ribosomal proteins are discussed.     

Structural analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 of the precursor ribosomal RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Full-length precursor ribosomal RNA molecules (6440 bases) were produced in vitro using a plasmid containing the yeast 35 S pre-rRNA operon under the control of phage T7 promoter. The higher-order structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) region (between the 5.8 S and 25 S rRNA sequence) in the pre-rRNA molecule was investigated using a combination of enzymatic and chemical structural probes. The data were used to evaluate several structural models predicted by a minimum free-energy calculation. The results supported a model in which the 3' end of the 5.8 S rRNA and the 5' end of the 25 S rRNA are hydrogen-bonded better than the one in which the ends are not. The model contains a high degree of secondary structure with several stable hairpins. Similar structural models for the ITS-2 regions of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, mung bean and Xenopus laevis were derived. Certain common folding features appear to be conserved, in spite of extensive sequence divergence. The yeast model should be useful as a prototype in future investigations of the structure, function and processing of pre-rRNA.     

Unusual ribosomal RNA gene organization in copepods of the genus Calanus

Ribosomal RNA genes in the nuclear genomes of eukaryotes are generally found in tandemly repeated units encoding 18 S, 5.8 S and 28 S rRNA (in that order). 5 S rRNA genes typically lie outside these units, most often in tandem clusters coding exclusively for 5 S rRNA. Inclusion of 5 S genes within the 18 S-5.8 S-28 S repeat unit is known only for certain protozoa and fungi. Here we report that, in the copepod Calanus finmarchicus, single 5 S genes are included within many or all of the 18 S-5.8 S-28 S repeat units. Sequence analyses of regions cloned from two of these repeat units show that they indeed include 5 S genes (which are distal to 28 S genes) and that these are transcribed from opposite strands.     

The sequence of the 5.8 S ribosomal RNA of the crustacean Artemia salina. With a proposal for a general secondary structure model for 5.8 S ribosomal RNA.

We report the primary structure of 5.8 S rRNA from the crustacean Artemia salina. The preparation shows length heterogeneity at the 5'-terminus, but consists of uninterrupted RNA chains, in contrast to some insect 5.8 S rRNAs, which consist of two chains of unequal length separated in the gene by a short spacer. The sequence was aligned with those of 11 other 5.8 S rRNAs and a general secondary structure model derived. It has four helical regions in common with the model of Nazar et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 250, 8591-8597 (1975)), but for a fifth helix a different base pairing scheme was found preferable, and the terminal sequences are presumed to bind to 28 S rRNA instead of binding to each other. In the case of yeast, where both the 5.8 S and 26 S rRNA sequences are known, the existence of five helices in 5.8 S rRNA is shown to be compatible with a 5.8 S - 26 S rRNA interaction model.     

Molecular organization of dinoflagellate ribosomal DNA: evolutionary implications of the deduced 5.8 S rRNA secondary structure

The 5.8 S rRNA gene of Prorocentrum micans, a primitive dinoflagellate, has been cloned and its 159 base pairs (bp) have been sequenced along with the two flanking internal transcribed spacers (ITS 1 and 2), respectively, 212 and 195 bp long. Nucleotide sequence homologies between several previously published 5.8 S rRNA gene sequences including those from another dinoflagellate, an ascomycetous yeast, protozoans, a higher plant and a mammal have been determined by sequence alignment. Two prokaryotic 5'-ends of the 23 S rRNA gene have been compared owing to their probable common origin with eucaryotic 5.8 S rRNA genes. Several nucleotides are distinctive for dinoflagellates when compared with either typical eucaryotes or procaryotes. This is consistent with an early divergence of the dinoflagellate lineage from the typical eucaryotes. The secondary structure of dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA molecules fits the model of Walker et al. (1983). Conserved nucleotides which distinguish dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA from that of other eucaryotes are located in specific loops which are assumed to play a structural role in the ribosome. A 5.8 S rRNA phylogenetic tree which is proposed, based on sequence data, supports our initial assumption of the dinoflagellates.     

Maturation pathway for Novikoff ascites hepatoma 5.8 S ribosomal ribonucleic acid. Evidence for its presence in 32 S nuclear ribonucleic acid.

Evidence that 32 S nRNA contains 5.8 S rRNA was provided by studies on specific oligonucleotide sequences of these RNA species. Purified 32P-labeled 5.8 and 28 S rRNA and 32 S RNA were digested with T-1 ribonuclease, and the products were fractionated according to chain length by chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex A-25 at neutral pH. The oligonucleotides in Peak 8 were treated with alkaline phosphatase and the products were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis on cellulose acetate at pH 3.5 and DEAE-paper in 7% formic acid. Seven unique oligonucleotide markers for 5.8 S rRNA including the methylated octanucleotide A-A-U-U-Gm-G-A-Gp were present in 32 S RNA but were not found in 28 S rRNA, indicating that 5.8 S rRNA is directly derived from the 32 S nucleolar precursor. These studies confirm a maturation pathway for rRNA species in which 32 S nucleolar RNA is a precursor of 5.8 S rRNA as well as 28 S rRNA.     

Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA.

Oligonucleotide products of complete pancreatic or T1 RNase digestion or partial T1 RNase digestion of HeLa cell (human) and MPC-11 cell (mouse) 5.8S rRNA are identical with those obtained from Novikoff hepatoma (rat) 5.8S rRNA except for minor differences at the termini. pCp is the only major 5' terminus of both human and mouse RNAs; both pGp and pCp 5' termini were found in rat 5.8S RNA. Furthermore, HeLa cells contain C-U-U at the 3' end rather than the C-U terminus of mouse and rat. The results indicate that the nucleotide sequence has been highly conserved during the evolution of mammals and suggest that, as reported for 5S rRNA, this sequence is essentially constant throughout the Mammalia.     

Structural analyses of mammalian ribosomal ribonucleic acid and its precursors. Nucleotide sequence of ribosomal 5.8 S ribonucleic acid.

The nucleotide sequence of ribosomal 5.8 S RNA (also known as 7 S or 5.5 S rRNA) from Novikoff hepatoma ascites cells has been determined to be (see article). Estimations of the secondary structure based upon maximized base pairing and the fragments of partial ribonuclease digestion indicate that there may be five base-paired regions in the molecule, three forming a folding of the termini and two forming secondary hairpin loops. The sequence of Novikoff hepatoma 5.8 S rRNA is about 75% homologous with that of yeast 5.8 S rRNA (Rubin, G.M. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3860-3875) and similar models for secondary structure are proposed. Both models contain a very stable G-C rich hairpin loop (residues 116 to 138), a less stable A-U-rich hairpin loop (residues 64 to 91) and two symmetrical bulges (residues 15 to 25 and 40 to 44).     

Higher-order structure of the 5.8 S rRNA sequence within the yeast 35 S precursor ribosomal RNA synthesized in vitro

Dimethylsulfate, 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)-carbodiimide metho-p-toluene-sulfonate, RNase T1 and RNase V1 have been used as structure-sensitive probes to examine the higher-order structure of the 5.8 S rRNA sequence within the yeast 35 S precursor ribosomal RNA molecule. Data produced have been used to evaluate several theoretical structure models for the 5.8 S rRNA sequence within the precursor rRNA. These models are generated by minimum free energy calculations. A model is proposed that accommodates 83% of the residues experimentally shown to be in either base-paired or single-stranded structure in the correct configuration. Several alternative suboptimal secondary structures have been evaluated. Moreover, the chemical reactivities of several residues within the 5.8 S rRNA sequence in the precursor rRNA molecule differ from those of the corresponding residues in the mature rRNA molecule. This finding provides experimental evidence to support the notion that the 5.8 S rRNA sequence within the precursor rRNA undergoes structural reorganization following rRNA processing.     

Localization and structure of endonuclease cleavage sites involved in the processing of the rat 32S precursor to ribosomal RNA.

The initial endonuclease cleavage site in 32 S pre-rRNA (precursor to rRNA) is located within the rate rDNA sequence by S1-nuclease protection mapping of purified nucleolar 28 S rRNA and 12 S pre-rRNA. The heterogeneous 5'- and 3'-termini of these rRNA abut and map within two CTC motifs in tSi2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) located at 50-65 and 4-20 base-pairs upstream from the homogeneous 5'-end of the 28 S rRNA gene. These results show that multiple endonuclease cleavages occur at CUC sites in tSi2 to generate 28 S rRNA and 12 S pre-rRNA with heterogeneous 5'- and 3'-termini, respectively. These molecules have to be processed further to yield mature 28 S and 5.8 S rRNA. Thermal-denaturation studies revealed that the base-pairing association in the 12 S pre-rRNA:28 S rRNA complex is markedly stronger than that in the 5.8 S:28 S rRNA complex. The sequence of about one-quarter (1322 base-pairs) of the 5'-part of the rat 28 S rDNA was determined. A computer search reveals the possibility that the cleavage sites in the CUC motifs are single-stranded, flanked by strongly base-paired GC tracts, involving tSi2 and 28 S rRNA sequences. The subsequent nuclease cleavages, generating the termini of mature rRNA, seem to be directed by secondary-structure interactions between 5.8 S and 28 S rRNA segments in pre-rRNA. An analysis for base-pairing among evolutionarily conserved sequences in 32 S pre-rRNA suggests that the cleavages yielding mature 5.8 S and 28 S rRNA are directed by base-pairing between (i) the 3'-terminus of 5.8 S rRNA and the 5'-terminus of 28 S rRNA and (ii) the 5'-terminus of 5.8 S rRNA and internal sequences in domain I of 28 S rRNA. A general model for primary- and secondary-structure interactions in pre-rRNA processing is proposed, and its implications for ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes are briefly discussed.     

The metabolism of ribosomal proteins microinjected into the oocytes of Xenopus laevis

When the total proteins from Xenopus laevis 60 S ribosomal subunits (TP60) were 3H-labeled in vitro and injected back into X. laevis oocytes, most 3H-TP60 are integrated into the cytoplasmic 60 S subunits via the nucleus during 16 h of incubation. In the oocytes whose rRNA synthesis is inhibited, 3H-TP60 are rapidly degraded with a half-life of 2-3 h. This degradation ceased as soon as rRNA synthesis was resumed, suggesting that ribosomal proteins unassociated with nascent rRNA are unstable in the oocytes. The degradation of 3H-TP60 in the absence of RNA synthesis was inhibited by iodoacetamide, a cysteine protease inhibitor, resulting in the accumulation of 3H-TP60 in the nucleus reaching about a threefold concentration in the cytoplasm. Considering the results with enucleated oocytes, we suggest that the X. laevis nucleus has a limited capacity to accumulate ribosomal proteins in an active manner but that those ribosomal proteins accumulated in excess over rRNA synthesis are degraded by a cysteine protease in the nucleus. By contrast, ribosomal proteins from Escherichia coli only equilibrate between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and are degraded by serine protease(s) in the cytoplasm without being integrated in the form of ribosomes in the nucleus.