Heterodimerization of the Sialidase NEU1 with the Chaperone Protective Protein/Cathepsin A Prevents Its Premature Oligomerization

Lysosomal neuraminidase-1 (NEU1) forms a multienzyme complex with β-galactosidase and protective protein/cathepsin A (PPCA). Because of its association with PPCA, which acts as a molecular chaperone, NEU1 is transported to the lysosomal compartment, catalytically activated, and stabilized. However, the mode(s) of association between these two proteins both en route to the lysosome and in the multienzyme complex has remained elusive. Here, we have analyzed the hydrodynamic properties of PPCA, NEU1, and a complex of the two proteins and identified multiple binding sites on both proteins. One of these sites on NEU1 that is involved in binding to PPCA can also bind to other NEU1 molecules, albeit with lower affinity. Therefore, in the absence of PPCA, as in the lysosomal storage disease galactosialidosis, NEU1 self-associates into chain-like oligomers. Binding of PPCA can reverse self-association of NEU1 by causing the disassembly of NEU1-oligomers and the formation of a PPCA-NEU1 heterodimeric complex. The identification of binding sites between the two proteins allowed us to create innovative structural models of the NEU1 oligomer and the PPCA-NEU1 heterodimeric complex. The proposed mechanism of interaction between NEU1 and its accessory protein PPCA provides a rationale for the secondary deficiency of NEU1 in galactosialidosis.Mammalian neuraminidases have been classified as lysosomal (NEU1),⁴ cytosolic (NEU2), plasma membrane (NEU3), and mitochondria/lysosomal (NEU4) based on their subcellular distributions, pH optimum, kinetic properties, responses to ions and detergents, and substrate specificities (1–3). Of the four sialidases, only NEU1 is ubiquitously expressed at different levels in various tissues and cell types (4–7). The importance of these proteins in normal cellular physiology is illustrated by the numerous metabolic processes that they control, including cell proliferation and differentiation, cell adhesion, membrane fusion and fluidity, immunocyte function, and receptor modification (8–21).NEU1 initiates the intralysosomal hydrolysis of sialo-oligosaccharides, -glycolipids, and -glycoproteins by removing their terminal sialic acid residues. In human and murine tissues, NEU1 forms a complex with at least two other proteins, β-galactosidase and the protective protein/cathepsin A (PPCA) (22). By virtue of their association with PPCA, NEU1 and β-galactosidase acquire their active and stable conformation in lysosomes. However, PPCA appears to function as a crucial chaperone/transport protein for NEU1. Because NEU1 is poorly mannose 6-phosphorylated, it depends on PPCA for correct compartmentalization and catalytic activation in lysosomes (23–25). Only a small amount of PPCA and β-galactosidase activities is found in the NEU1-PPCA-β-galactosidase complex, which instead contains all of the NEU1 catalytic activity (24–27). By understanding how and when NEU1 and PPCA interact, how they regulate each other in different cell types, and what determinants control their association, we may gain important insight into their significance in physiologic and pathologic conditions.The absence of NEU1 is associated with two neurodegenerative diseases that involve glycoprotein metabolism; sialidosis, which is caused by structural lesions in the lysosomal NEU1 locus (28), and galactosialidosis (GS), a combined deficiency of NEU1 and β-galactosidase which is caused by the absence of PPCA (22). Patients with sialidosis and those with GS have similar clinical and biochemical features, and both diseases are characterized by multiple phenotypes that are classified according to the age of onset and severity of the symptoms.Previously, we generated two animal models of primary or secondary NEU1 deficiency, Neu1^−/− mice and Ppca^−/− mice. Both mouse models have a profound loss of Neu1 activity in multiple tissues and develop clinical, biochemical, and pathologic manifestations resembling those seen in patients with severe sialidosis and GS (29–31). Neu1^−/− mice are phenotypically similar but not identical to Ppca^−/− mice and, like children with the disease, exhibit a time-dependent splenomegaly associated with extramedullary hematopoiesis (30, 31). We found that the cause of these phenotypic abnormalities is the gradual loss of retention of hematopoietic progenitors within the bone niche due to exacerbated lysosomal exocytosis of bone marrow cells. The latter process is negatively regulated by NEU1 activity (31).The mode of interaction between PPCA and NEU1 and the mechanism of catalytic activation are not well understood. Here we present biochemical, analytical, and structural analyses of NEU1, PPCA, and the PPCA-NEU1 complex by using purified baculovirus (BV)-expressed wild-type and mutagenized recombinant enzymes and synthetic peptides.     

Identification of Novel Serological Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Escherichia coli Proteome Chip

Specific antimicrobial antibodies present in the sera of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been proven to be valuable serological biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis of the disease. Herein we describe the use of a whole Escherichia coli proteome microarray as a novel high throughput proteomics approach to screen and identify new serological biomarkers for IBD. Each protein array, which contains 4,256 E. coli K12 proteins, was screened using individual serum from healthy controls (n = 39) and clinically well characterized patients with IBD (66 Crohn disease (CD) and 29 ulcerative colitis (UC)). Proteins that could be recognized by serum antibodies were visualized and quantified using Cy3-labeled goat anti-human antibodies. Surprisingly significance analysis of microarrays identified a total of 417 E. coli proteins that were differentially recognized by serum antibodies between healthy controls and CD or UC. Among those, 169 proteins were identified as highly immunogenic in healthy controls, 186 proteins were identified as highly immunogenic in CD, and only 19 were identified as highly immunogenic in UC. Using a supervised learning algorithm (k-top scoring pairs), we identified two sets of serum antibodies that were novel biomarkers for specifically distinguishing CD from healthy controls (accuracy, 86 ± 4%; p < 0.01) and CD from UC (accuracy, 80 ± 2%; p < 0.01), respectively. The Set 1 antibodies recognized three pairs of E. coli proteins: Era versus YbaN, YhgN versus FocA, and GabT versus YcdG, and the Set 2 antibodies recognized YidX versus FrvX. The specificity and sensitivity of Set 1 antibodies were 81 ± 5 and 89 ± 3%, respectively, whereas those of Set 2 antibodies were 84 ± 1 and 70 ± 6%, respectively. Serum antibodies identified for distinguishing healthy controls versus UC were only marginal because their accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 66 ± 5, 69 ± 5, and 61 ± 7%, respectively (p < 0.04). Taken together, we identified novel sets of serological biomarkers for diagnosis of CD versus healthy control and CD versus UC.Crohn disease (CD)¹ and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, idiopathic, and clinically heterogeneous intestinal disorders collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (1, 2). Although the distinction between UC and CD would seem clear based on the combination of clinical, endoscopic, and radiological criteria, indeterminate colitis is present in up to 10 and 20% of adult and pediatric patients with isolated colitis, respectively (3, 4).Serological testing is a non-invasive method for diagnosing IBD and differentiating UC from CD (5–7). Several serological IBD biomarkers have been identified in the past decade, and some have been used in IBD clinics (5–7) (see the list below). Many of these antibodies are produced on intestinal exposure to normal commensal bacteria in genetically susceptible individuals. Although it is not known whether these antibodies are pathogenic or not, they are specific to patients with either CD or UC and may reflect a dysregulated immune inflammatory response to intestinal bacterial antigens (2, 8–10). Several experimental animal models of IBD have led to the theory that the pathogenesis of IBD is the result of an aberrant immune response to normal commensal bacteria in genetically susceptible individuals (11, 12). In fact, most of the major serological biomarkers being used in IBD clinics are antibodies to microbial antigens, including yeast oligomannose (anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA)), bacterial outer membrane porin C (OmpC), Pseudomonas fluorescens bacterial sequence I2 (anti-I2), and most recently bacterial flagellin (CBir 1) (5–7, 13). All of these antimicrobial antibodies show a preponderance in patients with CD. However, ASCA has been identified in up to 5% of patients with UC (13, 14).In comparison, perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) with perinuclear highlighting was first described in 1990. Although generally considered an autoantibody, the specific antigenic stimulation for pANCA production remains unclear. This autoantibody is present in up to 70% of patients with UC and in up to 20% of patients with CD (6, 10). Recently a panel of five new anti-glycan antibodies have been identified, including anti-chitobioside IgA, anti-laminaribioside IgG, anti-mannobioside IgG, and antibodies against two major chemically synthesized (Σ) oligomannose epitopes, Man α-1,3 Man α-1,2 Man (ΣMan3) and Man α-1,3 Man α-1,2 Man α-1,2 Man (ΣMan4) (5, 13, 15). These new biomarkers serve as valuable complimentary tools to the available serological biomarkers mentioned above. Collectively these antibodies are not generally present in either children or adults with non-IBD disease and may represent serological markers of intestinal inflammation specific to UC or CD.Although encouraging, none of the current commercially available biomarker tests/assays, including all of those mentioned above, can be used as stand alone tools in clinics and therefore are only recommended as an adjunct to endoscopy in diagnosis and prognosis of the disease (5, 7, 16). Therefore, additional specific and sensitive IBD biomarkers are needed as are prospective studies to assess the utility of current and newly identified biomarkers (5, 13). Proteomics technologies such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, various variations of mass spectrometry, and protein chip (array) technology are now proving to be powerful tools in biomarker discovery and are beginning to be utilized in IBD biomarker discovery (5, 17). These technologies enable robust and/or large scale and high throughput identification and analysis of differential protein expression when comparing disease with control. Blood-based (serum- or plasma-based) proteomics holds particular promises for biomarker discovery of various human diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases and cancers (18–20). Antigen microarrays are also powerful tools that allow high throughput serum analysis of aberrant immune responses in autoimmune diseases (21–23) as well as efficient discovery of biomarkers for infectious pathogens (24). Herein we describe the use of an Escherichia coli proteome microarray to characterize the differential immune response (serum anti-E. coli antibodies) among patients clinically classified as CD, UC, and healthy controls. We hypothesized that novel IBD-specific antimicrobial antibodies, particularly anti-E. coli antibodies, are present in IBD patients and are likely to be identified by screening the sera with E. coli protein arrays.     

The Clavesin Family, Neuron-specific Lipid- and Clathrin-binding Sec14 Proteins Regulating Lysosomal Morphology

Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) originating from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) provide a major transport pathway from the secretory system to endosomes/lysosomes. Herein we describe paralogous Sec14 domain-bearing proteins, clavesin 1/CRALBPL and clavesin 2, identified through a proteomic analysis of CCVs. Clavesins are enriched on CCVs and form a complex with clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-1, major coat components of TGN-derived CCVs. The proteins co-localize with markers of endosomes and the TGN as well as with CHC and adaptor protein-1. A membrane mimic assay using the Sec14 domain of clavesin 1 reveals phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate as a specific lipid partner. Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate is localized to late endosomes/lysosomes, and interestingly, isoform-specific knockdown of clavesins in neurons using lentiviral delivery of interfering RNA leads to enlargement of a lysosome-associated membrane protein 1-positive membrane compartment with no obvious influence on the CCV machinery at the TGN. Since clavesins are expressed exclusively in neurons, this new protein family appears to provide a unique neuron-specific regulation of late endosome/lysosome morphology.Proteins entering the secretory pathway move through the Golgi apparatus to the trans-Golgi network (TGN)⁴ where they are sorted and packaged into carrier vesicles, including clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) for transport to their final destination (1). Adaptor protein-1 (AP-1), which is recruited to the TGN through dual interactions with Arf1 and phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (2), recruits clathrin to initiate CCV formation. AP-1 and clathrin form the membrane coat that shapes the vesicle and recruits an array of regulatory/accessory proteins, which control numerous aspects of CCV formation and function (3). Interactions with the clathrin·AP-1 coat complex also serve to recruit both transmembrane and cytosolic cargo to CCVs, allowing for their transport from the TGN to the endosomal network.The specificity and function of intracellular compartments depends in part on the presence of distinct PtdIns species. For example, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate is found predominantly at the TGN and contributes to AP-1 recruitment, whereas phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate recruits effectors, such as EEA1 (early endosome antigen 1), to early endosomes to mediate membrane fusion (4–9). Early endosomes subsequently transition into late endosomes/lysosomes, and during this process, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate is converted to PtdIns(3,5)P₂ via the action of a phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase named Fab1p in yeast and PIKfyve in mammals (10). PIKfyve is part of a protein complex nucleated by Vac14 (11, 12), and disruption of this complex leads to decreased PtdIns(3,5)P₂ levels and the formation of enlarged cytoplasmic vacuoles of endosomal/lysosomal origin (10, 13, 14). Intriguingly, despite the fact that Vac14 is found in all tissues (15) and regulates a ubiquitous trafficking process (10), decreases in PtdIns(3,5)P₂ levels resulting from Vac14 knock-out show massive neurodegeneration with little effect on other tissues (16). This neuron-specific effect has remained mysterious due to the lack of exclusively neuronal factors targeting PtdIns(3,5)P₂.The Sec14 domain is an evolutionarily ancient protein module that in humans is found in more than 45 proteins encoded by at least 25 genes (17). Mutations in several Sec14 proteins lead to human diseases, including neurodegeneration (18), yet most of the Sec14 proteins in mammals remain uncharacterized. The yeast protein Sec14p is the prototype for this module (19). Sec14p is essential for the transport of proteins from the Golgi (19), but more recently it was also found to be involved in the trafficking of protein cargo, specifically the mating factor receptor Ste3, from the plasma membrane via endosomes to the yeast vacuole (17). The yeast vacuole is the equivalent of the lysosome in mammalian cells. Yeast Sec14p is a phospholipid transfer protein that extracts phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylcholine from membranes in vitro and regulates the metabolism of these lipids in cells (19, 20). Sec14p is composed of the Sec14 domain only, whereas the majority of Sec14 proteins in mammals contain a Sec14 domain in conjunction with other modules or protein/lipid binding domains (21, 22). In the few well characterized examples, these proteins function to integrate lipid binding/metabolism with other biological functions (21, 22).In a subcellular proteomic analysis of CCVs from the brain, we identified eight novel open reading frames, including one encoding an Sec14 domain (23, 24). A subsequent bioinformatics analysis revealed a second, paralogous Sec14 protein. We now demonstrate that the proteins, which we have named clavesin (clathrin vesicle-associated Sec14 protein) 1 and 2, are neuron-specific proteins that function in the regulation of lysosome morphology.     

Proteomic Identification of Novel Secreted Antibacterial Toxins of the Serratia marcescens Type VI Secretion System

It has recently become apparent that the Type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a complex macromolecular machine used by many bacterial species to inject effector proteins into eukaryotic or bacterial cells, with significant implications for virulence and interbacterial competition. “Antibacterial” T6SSs, such as the one elaborated by the opportunistic human pathogen, Serratia marcescens, confer on the secreting bacterium the ability to rapidly and efficiently kill rival bacteria. Identification of secreted substrates of the T6SS is critical to understanding its role and ability to kill other cells, but only a limited number of effectors have been reported so far. Here we report the successful use of label-free quantitative mass spectrometry to identify at least eleven substrates of the S. marcescens T6SS, including four novel effector proteins which are distinct from other T6SS-secreted proteins reported to date. These new effectors were confirmed as antibacterial toxins and self-protecting immunity proteins able to neutralize their cognate toxins were identified. The global secretomic study also unexpectedly revealed that protein phosphorylation-based post-translational regulation of the S. marcescens T6SS differs from that of the paradigm, H1-T6SS of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Combined phosphoproteomic and genetic analyses demonstrated that conserved PpkA-dependent threonine phosphorylation of the T6SS structural component Fha is required for T6SS activation in S. marcescens and that the phosphatase PppA can reverse this modification. However, the signal and mechanism of PpkA activation is distinct from that observed previously and does not appear to require cell–cell contact. Hence this study has not only demonstrated that new and species-specific portfolios of antibacterial effectors are secreted by the T6SS, but also shown for the first time that PpkA-dependent post-translational regulation of the T6SS is tailored to fit the needs of different bacterial species.Gram-negative bacteria have evolved several specialized protein secretion systems to secrete a wide variety of substrate proteins into the extracellular milieu or to inject them into other, often eukaryotic, cells (1). Secreted proteins and their associated secretion systems are very important in bacterial virulence and interactions with other organisms (2). One of the most recent discoveries in this field is the Type VI secretion system (T6SS),¹ which occurs widely across bacterial species (3, 4) and can target proteins to both bacterial and eukaryotic cells (5). The significance of the T6SS is becoming increasingly apparent. It has been implicated in virulence, commensalism, and symbiosis with eukaryotes (5, 6). Additionally, in many bacteria, the T6SS is now implicated in antibacterial activity. T6SS-mediated antibacterial killing appears to be important for competition between bacterial species, for example within the resident microflora of a eukaryotic host (5, 7).Secretion by the T6SS relies on 13 conserved core components which are predicted to form a large machinery associated with the cell envelope, including membrane-bound and bacteriophage tail-like subassemblies (8, 9). The membrane bound subassembly consists of inner membrane proteins (TssLM) and an outer membrane lipoprotein (TssJ) and is anchored to the cell wall. The phage tail-like assembly consists of several proteins that show structural homology with T4 phage tail proteins or are organized in similar structures (10). Hcp (TssD) proteins form hexameric rings and are thought to stack into tube-like structures (11, 12). This Hcp tube is believed to be capped by a trimer of VgrG (TssI) proteins, which share structural homology with the needle of the T4 phage tail (10, 13). In addition, VipA (TssB) and VipB (TssC) form a large tubular structure highly reminiscent of the T4 phage tail sheath (14, 15). Such similarities have led to the idea that the T6SS resembles an inverted contractile bacteriophage infection machinery and injects substrates via an Hcp/VgrG needle into other cells. Recent models propose that the VipA/B sheath surrounds the Hcp/VgrG needle and contraction of the VipA/B tube pushes the Hcp/VgrG needle out of the cell (16–18). It has been postulated that this mechanism can be triggered by close contact with other neighboring cells (19–21).Assembly, localization, and remodelling of VipA/B tubules in vivo depend on the AAA+ ATPase ClpV (TssH), another essential core component of the T6SS (14, 16, 17). ClpV also interacts with the accessory component Fha (TagH) (22, 23), which is found in a subset of T6SSs (4). The Fha protein has an N-terminal domain with a forkhead associated motif, which is predicted to bind phospho-threonine peptides (24). In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Fha1 is phosphorylated by the Thr/Ser kinase PpkA (TagE) and dephosphorylated by the phosphatase PppA (TagG), and the phosphorylation state of Fha1 regulates the activity of the T6SS (22, 23). Phosphorylation of Fha in P. aeruginosa is also controlled by additional components, which act upstream of PpkA and form a regulatory cascade for T6SS activation (22, 25). Although homologs of PpkA and PppA have been identified in the T6SS gene clusters of certain other bacteria (3), the regulation of the T6SS by post-translational protein phosphorylation has not yet been experimentally investigated outside of Pseudomonas.To understand how the T6SS affects eukaryotic and bacterial cells, it is critical to identify substrate proteins secreted by the T6SS. The VgrG and Hcp proteins were the first identified T6SS substrates and appear to be generally secreted to the external milieu by all T6SSs (26). However, as mentioned above, Hcp and VgrG are core components of the T6SS machinery and therefore represent extracellular components of the secretion apparatus rather than genuine secreted effector proteins. Nonetheless, a limited number of VgrG homologs with extra functional effector domains at the C terminus have been identified or predicted, which account for some of the T6SS dependent effects seen against bacteria and eukaryotes. For example, the C-terminal domain of VgrG-1 from Vibrio cholerae shows actin crosslinking activity in eukaryotic cells (13, 27) and the C-terminal domain of V. cholerae VgrG-3 has bacterial cell wall hydrolase activity (28, 29).Recently, following much effort in the field, a small number of proteins secreted by the T6SS, but not structural components, have been experimentally identified. These proteins are regarded as true secreted substrates of the T6SS, with effector functions in target cells (29–35). For example, antibacterial T6SS-secreted effector proteins with peptidoglycan amidase (cell wall hydrolysis) function, the Type VI amidase effector (Tae) proteins, have been identified in Burkholderia thailandensis (32), P. aeruginosa (31), and Serratia marcescens (30). These Tae proteins play a role in T6SS-mediated antibacterial killing activity and genes encoding four families of Tae protein have been widely identified in other bacteria with T6SSs (32). T6SS-secreted effector proteins which are not peptidoglycan hydrolases have also been reported, including Tse2 secreted by P. aeruginosa, which acts in the bacterial cytoplasm (31), and the VasX and TseL proteins secreted by the V. cholerae T6SS, which are suggested to target membrane lipids (29, 34, 35). In the case of antibacterial T6SSs, the secreting bacterial cells are protected from their own T6SS effector proteins by specific immunity proteins (29–32, 35). However, given the large number of T6SSs in different bacterial species and their apparent ability to secrete multiple substrates, experimentally identified T6-secreted effector proteins still remain surprisingly scarce.Here we report the identification of multiple T6SS-secreted effector proteins in S. marcescens. S. marcescens is an opportunistic pathogen, for example causing ocular infections, nosocomial septicemia and pneumonia (36). Previously, we have identified a T6SS in S. marcescens Db10, which targets and efficiently kills other bacterial cells and plays a role in antibacterial competition (37). We have recently demonstrated that this T6SS secretes two antibacterial effectors, the Tae4 homologs Ssp1 and Ssp2, with cognate immunity proteins Rap1a and Rap2a (30).In this work, we report the analysis of the T6SS-dependent secretome of S. marcescens by label-free quantitation (LFQ) mass spectrometry and describe the identification and characterization of four novel T6SS-secreted effector proteins. These were confirmed as antibacterial toxins and specific immunity proteins were identified. Additionally, this global secretomic analysis, in combination with genetic and phosphoproteomic analyses, demonstrated that a post-translational phosphorylation system influences the ability of the S. marcescens T6SS to secrete effector proteins. Although this system uses homologs of the P. aeruginosa PpkA, PppA and Fha components, the circumstances and impact of Fha phosphorylation were shown to vary between organisms.     

The Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP10 Regulates the Post-endocytic Sorting of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator in Airway Epithelial Cells

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, is a cyclic AMP-regulated chloride channel and a regulator of other ion channels and transporters. In epithelial cells CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the apical plasma membrane and efficiently recycles back to the plasma membrane. Because ubiquitination targets endocytosed CFTR for degradation in the lysosome, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are likely to facilitate CFTR recycling. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify DUBs that regulate the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR. Using an activity-based chemical screen to identify active DUBs in human airway epithelial cells, we demonstrated that Ubiquitin Specific Protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. small interference RNA-mediated knockdown of USP10 increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation in lysosomes, and reduced both apical membrane CFTR and CFTR-mediated chloride secretion. Moreover, a dominant negative USP10 (USP10-C424A) increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation, whereas overexpression of wt-USP10 decreased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and increased the abundance of CFTR. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in facilitating the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.The endocytosis, endocytic recycling, and endosomal sorting of numerous transport proteins and receptors are regulated by ubiquitination (1–6). Ubiquitin, an 8-kDa protein, is conjugated to target proteins via a series of steps that includes ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1),² ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3) (1). Proteins that are ubiquitinated in the plasma membrane are internalized and are either deubiquitinated and recycle back to the plasma membrane or, via interactions with the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport machinery, are delivered to the lysosome for degradation (1–7). Sorting of ubiquitinated plasma membrane proteins for either the lysosomal pathway or for the recycling pathway is regulated, in part, by the removal of ubiquitin by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) (1–6). Thus, the balance between ubiquitination and deubiquitination regulates the plasma membrane abundance of several membrane proteins, including the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), the epidermal growth factor receptor, the transforming growth factor-β receptor, and the cytokine receptor γ-c (8–14).CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the plasma membrane and undergoes rapid and efficient recycling back to the plasma membrane in human airway epithelial cells, with >75% of endocytosed wild-type CFTR recycling back to the plasma membrane (15–18). A study published several years ago demonstrated that, although ubiquitination did not regulate CFTR endocytosis, ubiquitination reduced the plasma membrane abundance of CFTR in BHK cells by redirecting CFTR from recycling endosomes to lysosomes for degradation (19). However, neither the E3 ubiquitin ligase(s) responsible for the ubiquitination of CFTR nor the DUB(s) responsible for the deubiquitination of CFTR in the endocytic pathway have been identified in any cell type. Moreover, the effect of the ubiquitin status of CFTR on its endocytic sorting in human airway epithelial cells has not been reported. Thus, the goals of this study were to determine if the ubiquitin status regulates the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR in polarized airway epithelial cells, and to identify the DUBs that deubiquitinate CFTR.Approximately 100 DUBs have been identified in the human genome and are classified into five families based on sequence similarity and mechanism of action (1–6, 20, 21). To identify DUBs that regulate the deubiquitination of CFTR from this large class of enzymes, we chose an activity-based, chemical probe screening approach developed by Dr. Hidde Ploegh (4, 21, 22). This approach utilizes a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ubiquitin probe engineered with a C-terminal modification incorporating a thiol-reactive group that forms an irreversible, covalent bond with active DUBs. Using this approach we demonstrated in polarized human airway epithelial cells that ubiquitin-specific protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and thus its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in promoting the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.     

Dbf4-Cdc7 Phosphorylation of Mcm2 Is Required for Cell Growth

The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is required for the activation of the origins of replication, and DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro. We find that budding yeast Cdc7 alone exists in solution as a weakly active multimer. Dbf4 forms a likely heterodimer with Cdc7, and this species phosphorylates Mcm2 with substantially higher specific activity. Dbf4 alone binds tightly to Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 alone binds weakly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to phosphorylate Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2 near the N terminus of the protein, Ser-164 and Ser-170. Expression of mcm2-S170A is lethal to yeast cells that lack endogenous MCM2 (mcm2Δ); however, this lethality is rescued in cells harboring the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth.The Cdc7 protein kinase is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate origins (1, 2). The S phase cyclin-dependent kinase also activates yeast origins of replication (3–5). It has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase, and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6). However, it is not known how Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK)² acts during S phase to trigger the initiation of DNA replication. DDK has homologs in other eukaryotic species, and the role of Cdc7 in activation of replication origins during S phase may be conserved (7–10).The Mcm2-7 complex functions with Cdc45 and GINS to unwind DNA at a replication fork (11–15). A mutation of MCM5 (mcm5-bob1) bypasses the cellular requirements for DBF4 and CDC7 (16), suggesting a critical physiologic interaction between Dbf4-Cdc7 and Mcm proteins. DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro with proteins purified from budding yeast (17, 18) or human cells (19). Furthermore, there are mutants of MCM2 that show synthetic lethality with DBF4 mutants (6, 17), suggesting a biologically relevant interaction between DBF4 and MCM2. Nevertheless, the physiologic role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a matter of dispute. In human cells, replacement of MCM2 DDK-phosphoacceptor residues with alanines inhibits DNA replication, suggesting that Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 in humans is important for DNA replication (20). In contrast, mutation of putative DDK phosphorylation sites at the N terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2 results in viable cells, suggesting that phosphorylation of S. pombe Mcm2 by DDK is not critical for cell growth (10).In budding yeast, Cdc7 is present at high levels in G₁ and S phase, whereas Dbf4 levels peak in S phase (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, budding yeast DDK binds to chromatin during S phase (6), and it has been shown that Dbf4 is required for Cdc7 binding to chromatin in budding yeast (23, 24), fission yeast (25), and Xenopus (9). Human and fission yeast Cdc7 are inert on their own (7, 8), but Dbf4-Cdc7 is active in phosphorylating Mcm proteins in budding yeast (6, 26), fission yeast (7), and human (8, 10). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6, 9, 18, 21–24). However, a mechanistic analysis of how Dbf4 activates Cdc7 has not yet been accomplished. For example, the multimeric state of the active Dbf4-Cdc7 complex is currently disputed. A heterodimer of fission yeast Cdc7 (Hsk1) in complex with fission yeast Dbf4 (Dfp1) can phosphorylate Mcm2 (7). However, in budding yeast, oligomers of Cdc7 exist in the cell (27), and Dbf4-Cdc7 exists as oligomers of 180 and 300 kDa (27).DDK phosphorylates the N termini of human Mcm2 (19, 20, 28), human Mcm4 (10), budding yeast Mcm4 (26), and fission yeast Mcm6 (10). Although the sequences of the Mcm N termini are poorly conserved, the DDK sites identified in each study have neighboring acidic residues. The residues of budding yeast Mcm2 that are phosphorylated by DDK have not yet been identified.In this study, we find that budding yeast Cdc7 is weakly active as a multimer in phosphorylating Mcm2. However, a low molecular weight form of Dbf4-Cdc7, likely a heterodimer, has a higher specific activity for phosphorylation of Mcm2. Dbf4 or DDK, but not Cdc7, binds tightly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2, Ser-164 and Ser-170, in an acidic region of the protein. Mutation of Ser-170 is lethal to yeast cells, but this phenotype is rescued by the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Ser-170 of Mcm2 is required for budding yeast growth.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Ubiquitination Regulates Proteolytic Processing of G Protein-coupled Receptors after Their Sorting to Lysosomes

Ubiquitination is essential for the endocytic sorting of various G protein-coupled receptors to lysosomes. Here we identify a distinct function of this covalent modification in controlling the later proteolytic processing of receptors. Mutation of all cytoplasmic lysine residues in the murine δ-opioid receptor blocked receptor ubiquitination without preventing ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors or their subsequent delivery to lysosomes, as verified by proteolysis of extramembrane epitope tags and down-regulation of radioligand binding to the transmembrane helices. Surprisingly, a functional screen revealed that the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 specifically controls down-regulation of wild type receptors measured by radioligand binding without detectably affecting receptor delivery to lysosomes defined both immunochemically and biochemically. This specific AIP4-dependent regulation required direct ubiquitination of receptors and was also regulated by two deubiquitinating enzymes, AMSH and UBPY, which localized to late endosome/lysosome membranes containing internalized δ-opioid receptor. These results identify a distinct function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in controlling the later proteolytic processing of G protein-coupled receptors, without detectably affecting their endocytic sorting to lysosomes. We propose that ubiquitination or ubiquitination/deubiquitination cycling specifically regulates later proteolytic processing events required for destruction of the receptor''s hydrophobic core.A fundamental cellular mechanism contributing to homeostatic regulation of receptor-mediated signal transduction involves ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors followed by proteolysis in lysosomes. The importance of such proteolytic down-regulation has been documented extensively for a number of seven-transmembrane or G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),³ which comprise the largest known family of signaling receptors expressed in animals, as well as for other important signaling receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (1–5).One GPCR that is well known to undergo endocytic trafficking to lysosomes is the δ-opioid peptide receptor (DOR or DOP-R) (6). Following endocytosis, DOR traffics efficiently to lysosomes in both neural and heterologous cell models (6–8), whereas many membrane proteins, including various GPCRs, recycle rapidly to the plasma membrane (9–12). Such molecular sorting of internalized receptors between divergent recycling and degradative pathways is thought to play a fundamental role in determining the functional consequences of regulated endocytosis (2, 3, 13, 14). The sorting process that directs internalized DOR to lysosomes is remarkably efficient and appears to occur rapidly (within several min) after receptor endocytosis (11). Nevertheless, biochemical mechanisms that control lysosomal trafficking and proteolysis of DOR remain poorly understood.A conserved mechanism that promotes lysosomal trafficking of a number of membrane proteins, including various signaling receptors, is mediated by covalent modification of cytoplasmic lysine residues with ubiquitin (4, 15–17). Ubiquitination was first identified as an endocytic sorting determinant in studies of vacuolar trafficking of the yeast GPCR Ste2p (18). Subsequent studies have established numerous examples of lysyl-ubiquitination being required for sorting endocytic cargo to lysosomes and have identified conserved machinery responsible for the targeting of ubiquitinated cargo to lysosomes (3, 17, 19–22).The CXCR4 chemokine receptor provides a clear example of ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal sorting of a mammalian GPCR. Ubiquitination of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the CXCR4 receptor, mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4, is specifically required for the HRS- and VPS4-dependent trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes. Blocking this ubiquitination event by Lys → Arg mutation of the receptor specifically inhibits trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes, resulting in recycling rather than lysosomal proteolysis of receptors after ligand-induced endocytosis (23–25).Lysosomal trafficking of DOR, in contrast, is not prevented by mutation of cytoplasmic lysine residues (26) and can be regulated by ubiquitination-independent protein interaction(s) (27, 28). Nevertheless, both wild type and lysyl-mutant DORs traffic to lysosomes via a similar pathway as ubiquitin-dependent membrane cargo and require both HRS and active VPS4 to do so (29). These observations indicate that DOR engages the same core endocytic mechanism utilized by ubiquitination-directed membrane cargo but leave unresolved whether ubiquitination of DOR plays any role in this important cellular mechanism of receptor down-regulation.There is no doubt that DOR can undergo significant ubiquitination in mammalian cells, including HEK293 cells (30–32), where lysosomal trafficking of lysyl-mutant receptors was first observed (26). Ubiquitination was shown previously to promote proteolysis of DOR by proteasomes and to function in degrading misfolded receptors from the biosynthetic pathway (30, 31). A specific role of ubiquitination in promoting proteasome- but not lysosome-mediated proteolysis of DOR has been emphasized (32) and proposed to contribute to proteolytic down-regulation of receptors also from the plasma membrane (33).To our knowledge, no previous studies have determined if DOR ubiquitination plays any role in controlling receptor proteolysis mediated by lysosomes, although this represents a predominant pathway by which receptors undergo rapid down-regulation following ligand-induced endocytosis in a number of cell types, including HEK293 cells (8). In the present study, we have taken two approaches to addressing this fundamental question. First, we have investigated in greater detail the effects of lysyl-mutation on DOR ubiquitination and trafficking. Second, we have independently investigated the role of ubiquitination in controlling lysosomal proteolysis of wild type DOR. Our results clearly establish the ability of DOR to traffic efficiently to lysosomes in the absence of any detectable ubiquitination. Further, they identify a distinct and unanticipated function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in regulating the later proteolytic processing of receptors and show that this distinct ubiquitin-dependent regulatory mechanism operates effectively downstream of the sorting decision that commits internalized receptors for delivery to lysosomes.