How the human telomeric proteins TRF1 and TRF2 recognize telomeric DNA: a view from high-resolution crystal structures

Human telomeres consist of tandem arrays of TTAGGG sequence repeats that are specifically bound by two proteins, TRF1 and TRF2. They bind to DNA as preformed homodimers and have the same architecture in which the DNA-binding domains (Dbds) form independent structural units. Despite these similarities, TRF1 and TRF2 have different functions at telomeres. The X-ray crystal structures of both TRF1- and TRF2-Dbds in complex with telomeric DNA (2.0 and 1.8 angstroms resolution, respectively) show that they recognize the same TAGGGTT binding site by means of homeodomains, as does the yeast telomeric protein Rap1p. Two of the three G-C base pairs that characterize telomeric repeats are recognized specifically and an unusually large number of water molecules mediate protein-DNA interactions. The binding of the TRF2-Dbd to the DNA double helix shows no distortions that would account for the promotion of t-loops in which TRF2 has been implicated.     

Telomeres and the functional architecture of the nucleus

The single molecule of DNA that constitutes a eukaryotic chromosome begins and ends with a stretch of repetitive DNA known as a telomere. These sequences appear to be necessary to preserve the integrity of the genetic material through the cell cycle.Telomeric DNA is organized into regions of non-nucleosomal chromatin called the telosome, which can interact with other telosomes and with the nuclear envelope. This review focuses on cytological evidence for these interactions and on recent insights into the molecular organization of the telomeric complex.     

Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6

The DNA of eukaryotes is wrapped around nucleosomes and packaged into chromatin. Covalent modifications of the histone proteins that comprise the nucleosome alter chromatin structure and have major effects on gene expression. Methylation of lysine 4 of histone H3 by COMPASS is required for silencing of genes located near chromosome telomeres and within the rDNA (Krogan, N. J, Dover, J., Khorrami, S., Greenblatt, J. F., Schneider, J., Johnston, M., and Shilatifard, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 10753-10755; Briggs, S. D., Bryk, M., Strahl, B. D., Cheung, W. L., Davie, J. K., Dent, S. Y., Winston, F., and Allis, C. D. (2001) Genes. Dev. 15, 3286-3295). To learn about the mechanism of histone methylation, we surveyed the genome of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes necessary for this process. By analyzing approximately 4800 mutant strains, each deleted for a different non-essential gene, we discovered that the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Rad6 is required for methylation of lysine 4 of histone H3. Ubiquitination of histone H2B on lysine 123 is the signal for the methylation of histone H3, which leads to silencing of genes located near telomeres.     

Yeast telomeric sequences function as chromosomal anchorage points in vivo.

Site-specific recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to generate non-replicative DNA rings containing yeast telomeric sequences. In topoisomerase mutants expressing Escherichia coli topoisomerase I, the rings adopted a novel DNA topology consistent with the ability of yeast telomeric DNA to block or retard the axial rotation of DNA. DNA fragments bearing portions of the terminal repeat sequence C1-3 A/TG1-3 were both necessary and sufficient to create a barrier to DNA rotation. Synthetic oligonucleotide sequences containing Rap1p binding sites, a well represented motif in naturally occurring C1-3A arrays, also conferred immobilization; mutant Rap1p binding sites and telomeric sequences from other organisms were not sufficient. DNA anchoring was diminished by addition of competing telomeric sequences, implicating a role for an as yet unidentified limiting trans-acting factor. Though Rap1p is a likely protein constituent of the DNA anchor, deletion of the non-essential C-terminal domain did not affect the topology of telomeric DNA rings. Similarly, disruption of SIR2, SIR3 and SIR4, genes which influence a variety of telomere functions in yeast, also had no effect. We propose that telomeric DNA supports the formation of a SIR-independent macromolecular protein-DNA assembly that hinders the motion of DNA because of its linkage to an insoluble nuclear structure. Potential roles for DNA anchoring in telomere biology are discussed.     

Fractionation of nucleosomes by salt elution from micrococcal nuclease- digested nuclei

The solubilization of nucleosomes and histone H1 with increasing concentrations of NaCl has been investigated in rat liver nuclei that had been digested with micrococcal nuclease under conditions that did not substantially alter morphological properties with respect to differences in the extent of chromatin condensation. The pattern of nucleosome and H1 solubilization was gradual and noncoordinate and at least three different types of nucleosome packing interactions could be distinguished from the pattern. A class of nucleosomes containing 13-- 17% of the DNA and comprising the chromatin structures most available for micrococcal nuclease attack was eluted by 0.2 M NaCl. This fraction was solubilized with an acid-soluble protein of apparent molecular weight of 20,000 daltons and no histone H1. It differed from the nucleosomes released at higher NaCl concentrations in content of nonhistone chromosomal proteins. 40--60% of the nucleosomes were released by 0.3 M NaCl with 30% of the total nuclear histone H1 bound. The remaining nucleosomes and H1 were solublized by 0.4 M or 0.6 M NaCl. H1 was not nucleosome bound at these ionic strengths, and these fractions contained, respectively, 1.5 and 1.8 times more H1 per nucleosome than the population released by 0.3 M NaCl. These fractions contained the DNA least available for micrococcal nuclease attach. The strikingly different macromolecular composition, availability for nuclease digestion, and strength of the packing interactions of the nucleosomes released by 0.2 M NaCl suggest that this population is involved in a special function.     

Murine polypyrimidine tract binding protein. Purification, cloning, and mapping of the RNA binding domain.

A complex of nucleic acid binding proteins (100, 35, and 25 kDa) was purified to apparent homogeneity from nuclear extracts of the murine plasmacytoma J558L. Amino-terminal sequence analysis of the 25-kDa subunit enabled the isolation of a cDNA that encodes a 528-amino acid protein that is highly homologous to the human 62-kDa human polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) (Garcia-Blanco, M. A., Jamison, S. F., and Sharp, P. A. (1989) Genes & Dev. 3, 1874-1886; Gil, A., Sharp, P. A., Jamison, S. F., and Garcia-Blanco, M. A. (1991) Genes & Dev. 5, 1224-1236; Patton, J. G., Mayer, S. A., Tempst, P., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1991) Genes & Dev. 5, 1237-1251). Sequence comparison programs suggested the presence of domains related to the RNA recognition motif found in other RNA-binding proteins, and deletion analysis revealed that the carboxyl-terminal 195 amino acids of the recombinant PTB was sufficient for specific binding to pre-mRNAs. Cross-linking experiments identified a 25-kDa protein in crude nuclear extracts of J558L cells that possessed the RNA binding properties of PTB, while a approximately 60-kDa protein is detected in other murine cell lines tested. Thus, the 25-kDa protein found in J558L is likely a proteolytic product of the murine polypyrimidine tract binding protein. A probe derived from the PTB cDNA detected a ubiquitous 3.3-kb mRNA in murine cell lines and a 3.6-kb mRNA in human lines. Southern blot analysis revealed three strongly hybridizing DNA fragments and several more weakly hybridizing bands in mouse, human, and yeast DNA. The role of PTB in pre-mRNA splicing is discussed.     

Telomere maintenance through spatial control of telomeric proteins

The six human telomeric proteins TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, POT1, and TPP1 can form a complex called the telosome/shelterin, which is required for telomere protection and length control. TPP1 has been shown to regulate both POT1 telomere localization and telosome assembly through its binding to TIN2. It remains to be determined where such interactions take place and whether cellular compartmentalization of telomeric proteins is important for telomere maintenance. We systematically investigated here the cellular localization and interactions of human telomeric proteins. Interestingly, we found TIN2, TPP1, and POT1 to localize and interact with each other in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Unexpectedly, TPP1 contains a functional nuclear export signal that directly controls the amount of TPP1 and POT1 in the nucleus. Furthermore, binding of TIN2 to TPP1 promotes the nuclear localization of TPP1 and POT1. We also found that disrupting TPP1 nuclear export could result in telomeric DNA damage response and telomere length disregulation. Our findings highlight how the coordinated interactions between TIN2, TPP1, and POT1 in the cytoplasm regulate the assembly and function of the telosome in the nucleus and indicate for the first time the importance of nuclear export and spatial control of telomeric proteins in telomere maintenance.     

Proteins that bind to double-stranded regions of telomeric DNA

In budding yeast, the DNA-binding protein Rap1p orchestrates a negative feedback on regulation of telomere length and the organization of a heterochromatin-like telomeric compartment. Recent studies have led to the identification of functionally related telomeric proteins from fission yeast and mammals. These advances underline the key role played by the proteins that bind to the duplex part of telomeric DNA and reveal an important structural diversity among telomeric proteins.     

In vivo genomic footprint of a yeast centromere.

We have used in vivo genomic footprinting to investigate the protein-DNA interactions within the conserved DNA elements (CDEI, CDEII, and CDEIII) in the centromere from chromosome III of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The in vivo footprint pattern obtained from wild-type cells shows that some guanines within the centromere DNA are protected from methylation by dimethyl sulfate. These results are consistent with studies demonstrating that yeast cells contain sequence-specific centromere DNA-binding proteins. Our in vivo experiments on chromosomes with mutant centromeres show that some mutations which affect chromosome segregation also alter the footprint pattern caused by proteins bound to the centromere DNA. The results of this study provide the first fine-structure map of proteins bound to centromere DNA in living yeast cells and suggest a direct correlation between these protein-DNA interactions and centromere function.     

Single-molecule analysis of chromatin: changing the view of genomes one molecule at a time

Wrapping DNA into chromatin provides a wealth of regulatory mechanisms that ensure normal growth and development in eukaryotes. Our understanding of chromatin structure, including nucleosomes and non-histone protein-DNA interactions, has benefited immensely from nuclease and chemical digestion techniques. DNA-bound proteins, such as histones or site-specific factors, protect DNA against nuclease cleavage and generate large nucleosomal or small regulatory factor footprints. Chromatin subject to distinct modes of regulation often coincides with sites of nuclease hypersensitivity or nucleosome positioning. An inherent limitation of cleavage-based analyses has been the inability to reliably analyze regions of interest when levels of digestion depart from single-hit kinetics. Moreover, cleavage-based techniques provide views that are averaged over all the molecules in a sample population. Therefore, in cases of occupancy of multiple regulatory elements by factors, one cannot define whether the factors are bound to the same or different molecules in the population. The recent development of DNA methyltransferase-based, single-molecule MAP-IT technology overcomes limitations of ensemble approaches and has opened numerous new avenues in chromatin research. Here, we review the strengths, limitations, applications and future prospects of MAP-IT ranging from structural issues to mechanistic questions in eukaryotic chromatin regulation.     

In vivo topography of Rap1p-DNA complex at Saccharomyces cerevisiae TEF2 UAS(RPG) during transcriptional regulation

We have analyzed in detail the structure of RAP1-UAS(RPG) complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using multi-hit KMnO(4), UV and micrococcal nuclease high-resolution footprinting. Three copies of the Rap1 protein are bound to the promoter simultaneously in exponentially growing cells, as shown by KMnO(4) multi-hit footprinting analysis, causing extended and diagnostic changes in the DNA structure of the region containing the UAS(RPG). Amino acid starvation does not cause loss of Rap1p from the complex; however, in vivo UV-footprinting reveals the occurrence of structural modifications of the complex. Moreover, low-resolution micrococcal nuclease digestion shows that the chromatin of the entire region is devoid of positioned nucleosomes but is susceptible to changes in accessibility to the nuclease upon amino acid starvation. The implications of these results for the mechanism of Rap1p action are discussed.     

Acetylated nucleosome assembly on telomeric DNAs

The role of histone N-terminal domains on the thermodynamic stability of nucleosomes assembled on several different telomeric DNAs as well as on 'average' sequence DNA and on strong nucleosome positioning sequences, has been studied by competitive reconstitution. We find that histone tails hyperacetylation favors nucleosome formation, in a similar extent for all the examined sequences. On the contrary, removal of histone terminal domains by selective trypsinization causes a decrease of nucleosome stability which is smaller for telomeres compared to the other sequences examined, suggesting that telomeric sequences have only minor interactions with histone tails. Micrococcal nuclease kinetics shows enhanced accessibility of acetylated nucleosomes formed both on telomeric and 'average' sequence DNAs. These results suggest a more complex role for histone acetylation than the decrease of electrostatic interactions between DNA and histones.