RpoS-dependent promoters require guanosine tetraphosphate for induction even in the presence of high levels of sigma(s)

RpoS-dependent promoters require ppGpp for induction in the stationary phase. This has been thought to be a simple consequence of final sigma(S) itself requiring ppGpp for its production. By using four model promoters requiring final sigma(S) for normal induction in the stationary phase, we demonstrate that final sigma(S)-dependent promoters require ppGpp even in the presence of high levels of final sigma(S) produced ectopically. Similar to final sigma(70)-dependent promoters under positive control by ppGpp, the requirement of final sigma(S)-dependent promoters for this alarmone is bypassed by specific "stringent" mutations in the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase. The results suggest that stationary phase induction of both final sigma(S)- and final sigma(70)-dependent genes requires the stringent control modulon and that stringency confers dual control on the RpoS regulon by affecting promoter activity and the levels of the required final sigma-factor.     

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.     

Induction of a growth-phase-dependent promoter triggers transcription of bolA, an Escherichia coli morphogene.

The bolA gene, which is involved in the morphogenetic pathways of Escherichia coli, was sequenced and two potential promoters were identified. Expression from promoter P1, proximal to the bolA structural gene is specifically induced during the transition to the stationary phase of growth. This promoter contains an unusual--10 region (CGGCTAGTA), which defines a new class of E. coli promoters necessary for the dramatic increase in the rate of synthesis of a large set of proteins during the cessation of logarithmic growth. This conclusion was confirmed by identifying two additional E. coli promoters and one plasmid promoter, which also were induced during the transition to the stationary phase of growth. Analysis of proteins produced during the exponential and stationary phases of growth in a bolA null mutant suggest a possible role for the BolA protein in the induction of the expression of penicillin-binding protein 6 (PBP6) in the transition to the stationary phase. Supporting this hypothesis is the presence of a putative DNA-binding domain within the bolA coding sequence.