SYBR GreenⅠ实时荧光定量RT-PCR测定肠道病毒71型（EV71）RNA拷贝数方法的建立

目的建立SYBR GreenⅠ荧光染料实时定量RT-PCR方法,测定实验动物等来源的EV71病毒RNA。方法运用EV71VP1保守区引物,优化real time RT-PCR条件,运用NASBA方法扩增EV71病毒RNA,计算拷贝数,经10倍系列稀释做出标准曲线,作为EV71病毒RNA定量检测的外标准品。结果应用Qiagen公司QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit,该标准品可精确定量到100copies/μL,PCR扩增效率达到99.5%。结论 SYBRGreenⅠ荧光染料实时定量PCR法测定EV71病毒RNA拷贝数的方法敏感性高、稳定性好,可用于EV71病毒RNA载量的定量测定。     

荧光定量PCR精确检测人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA拷贝数方法的建立

建立一种精确定量人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA拷贝数的方法。构建包含线粒体DNANDl和核单拷贝基β-globin基因序列的重组质粒作为标准品;收集无饲养层培养体系下人胚胎干细胞DNA样本,结合2个单独的Taqman探针实时荧光定量PCR对待测样本中线粒体NDl和核β-globin基因分别进行定量,从而对人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA的含量进行了精确定量。结果提示,人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA的平均拷贝数／细胞为1321±228。研究表明,该技术可对人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA拷贝数进行准确的测定,为研究培养条件对人胚胎干细胞线粒体DNA拷贝数的影响及优化体外培养条件奠定了基础。     

SYBR Green Ⅰ实时荧光定量RT-PCR测定猴免疫缺陷病毒RNA拷贝数方法的建立

目的 建立SYBR Green Ⅰ荧光染料实时定量RT-PCR方法,测定猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)RNA拷贝数.方法 巢式RT-PCR扩增SIV病毒RNA gag基因上1360-1837之间的长度为477 bp的片段,将该片段克隆到pGEM T载体上,构建pGEM-SIVgag477质粒.该质粒经限制性内切酶Not I酶切后,进行体外转录,转录出的RNA产物(RS)纯化后10倍系列稀释,作出标准曲线,作为SIV病毒RNA荧光定量检测的外标准品.结果 应用Qiagen公司QuantiTect SYBR GREEN RT-PCR Kit,该标准品可精确定量到100 copies/μL.结论 制备的RS外标准品纯度高,SYBR Green Ⅰ荧光染料实时定量RT-PCR法特异性、敏感性高,稳定性好,可用于定量测定猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)RNA拷贝数.     

标准品制备方法对FQ-PCR定量基因表达水平的影响

实时荧光定量PCR (FQ-PCR)标准曲线法准确定量基因表达的关键在于标准品与待检样本的扩增效率是否一致. 为检测DNA标准品与样本cDNA扩增效率的一致性,探讨定量用标准品的最佳制备方法,本研究以脂肪酸结合蛋白5(Fabp5)、过氧化物酶体增殖活化受体α (Ppar-α)及β肌动蛋白（β-Actin）的3个基因为对象,分别采用质粒纯化法、PCR产物直接纯化法、PCR产物凝胶回收法制备DNA标准品,10倍梯度稀释后用FQ PCR制作标准曲线. 并以10倍梯度稀释的样本cDNA标准曲线的参数为对照,进行比较分析. 结果表明,不同方法制备的DNA标准品的扩增效率差异较大,并且与cDNA的扩增效率不一致,不能对cDNA样本进行准确定量. 另外,虽然目的基因在cDNA样本中的拷贝未知,不能对基因表达水平进行绝对定量,但因不同cDNA样本的同一基因的扩增效率一致, 可对基因的表达进行准确的相对定量.     

早晚牙菌斑变异链球菌定植差异的定量PCR检测

目的 采用实时荧光定量PCR检测白天和晚上所形成牙菌斑生物膜中变异链球菌的数量,比较早晚牙菌斑中变异链球菌定植的差异.方法 收集30名健康成人全口口腔洁治后白天和晚上形成的龈上菌斑,提取细菌基因组DNA.合成变异链球菌特异性引物,纯化PCR产物获得目的基因连接于pTA-TA载体,克隆于大肠埃希菌DH5 α感受态细胞.选取阳性克隆测序后纯化质粒DNA,获得质粒标准品.将样本和梯度稀释的质粒标准品进行SYBR Green Ⅰ实时荧光定量PCR检测,确定标准曲线,定量样本中变异链球菌DNA的拷贝数.结果 早晚牙菌斑细菌基因组DNA样本的扩增曲线均在标准品的扩增曲线范围内.晚上所形成牙菌斑中定植的变异链球菌数量(对数值7.67 ±0.77)高于白天定植的变异链球菌数量(对数值7.25±0.62)(P =0.007).结论 牙菌斑的微生物定植存在日夜节奏变化,晚上所形成牙菌斑中变异链球菌数量多于白天.     

枣疯病植原体实时荧光定量PCR检测方法的研究

目的:建立枣疯病植原体拷贝数检测实时荧光定量PCR方法,为枣疯病植原体定量检测提供技术支持。方法:构建质粒标准品,设计实时荧光PCR探针引物,优化体系,建立标准曲线,并进行重复性验证。结果:制备了枣疯病植原体标准质粒,建立了稳定的质粒标准品检测体系(R2=0.998,检测限10拷贝,定量限100拷贝)。结论:实时荧光定量PCR检测方法重复性好,可用于枣疯病植原体的拷贝数检测,为枣疯病植原体检验检测和病害防治提供了技术支持。     

TaqMan荧光定量RT-PCR检测水稻RAc1基因mRNA方法的建立

构建包含RAc1基因cDNA片段的质粒,作为水稻肌动蛋白基因RAc1之mRNA定量检测的标准品,建立检测方法,为水稻其他基因的定量建立内参.从水稻叶总RNA中逆转录扩增总cDNA,PCR扩增RAc1基因中设计的目的片段,将纯化的目的片段与pMD19-T Simple载体进行连接,转化宿主菌JM-109,提取重组质粒DNA,PCR鉴定并测序分析.纯化质粒并检测260nm吸光值,确定重组质粒原液的拷贝浓度并以此制备荧光定量PCR梯度浓度标准品,进行实时荧光定量PCR实验.建立了RAc1基因mRNA表达实时荧光定量PCR检测方法,特异性好,检测灵敏度达102拷贝,线性范围为102～107拷贝,阈值循环数(Ct)与PCR体系中起始模板量的对数值之间有着良好的线性关系(r=1.000),扩增效率高(E=98.2%).建立了基因RAc1实时定量PCR的质粒标准品.     

TaqMan荧光定量RT-PCR检测水稻RAcl基因mRNA方法的建立

构建包含RAcl基因cDNA片段的质粒,作为水稻肌动蛋白基因RAcl之mRNA定量检测的标准品,建立检测方法,为水稻其他基因的定量建立内参。从水稻叶总RNA中逆转录扩增总cDNA,PCR扩增RAcl基因中设计的目的片段,将纯化的目的片段与pMD19-T Simple载体进行连接,转化宿主菌JM-109,提取重组质粒DNA,PCR鉴定并测序分析。纯化质粒并检测260nm吸光值,确定重组质粒原液的拷贝浓度并以此制备荧光定量PCR梯度浓度标准品,进行实时荧光定量PCR实验。建立了RAcl基因mRNA表达实时荧光定量PCR检测方法,特异性好,检测灵敏度达102拷贝,线性范围为102—1护拷贝,阈值循环数（Ct）与PCR体系中起始模板量的对数值之间有着良好的线性关系（r=1．000）,扩增效率高（E=98．2％）。建立了基因RAcl实时定量PCR的质粒标准品。     

版纳微型猪近交系TNF-α基因mRNA实时荧光定量PCR检测方法的建立

目的快速、灵敏、可靠的检测与临床多种疾病密切相关的重要基因TNF-α的表达情况,构建TNF-α基因及内参GAPDH基因荧光定量PCR质粒标准品。方法利用版纳微型猪近交系4～6月龄猪建立动物模型,提取皮肤创面总RNA,设计特异引物,进行RT-PCR扩增。纯化目的片段与pMD18-T载体连接,转化宿主菌DH5α,提取重组质粒DNA,并经酶切、PCR和测序鉴定,计算重组质粒原液拷贝数浓度并制备梯度浓度标准品,进行实时荧光定量PCR,生成标准曲线。结果建立的TNF-α基因和GAPDH内参基因mRNA表达实时荧光定量PCR检测方法灵敏度分别可达103和105拷贝,线性范围分别为103～109和105～109拷贝,阈值循环数(Ct)与PCR体系中起始模板量的对数值之间存在的线性关系R2分别为0.993和0.999,扩增效率E分别为111.073%和95.948%。结论成功的构建了版纳微型猪近交系TNF-α基因质粒标准品和标准曲线,并用内参基因GAPDH进行校正,此方法可为探讨TNF-α基因在临床多种疾病中所发挥的分子机理奠定基础。     

番茄叶片基因组DNA快速制备技术及其在基于实时荧光定量PCR的转基因检测中的应用

以番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.cv.Micro-Tom)叶片为试材,建立了一种简便快速制备叶片基因组DNA的方法。2~20 mm2的叶片即可满足制备要求,制备过程只需一种提取试剂、只涉及1次移液和1次离心操作,不涉及沉淀。确定了所制备的DNA用于实时荧光定量PCR的合适用量为0.1~0.2μL(反应总体积为12.5μL),发现过量模板的使用可降低PCR效率且可导致扩增失败。该项DNA快速制备及相适应的实时荧光定量PCR技术已成功应用于番茄转基因植株检测。     

Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR

PCR amplification of limited amounts of DNA template carries an increased risk of product redundancy and contamination. We use molecular barcoding to label each genomic DNA template with an individual sequence tag prior to PCR amplification. In addition, we include molecular ‘batch-stamps’ that effectively label each genomic template with a sample ID and analysis date. This highly sensitive method identifies redundant and contaminant sequences and serves as a reliable method for positive identification of desired sequences; we can therefore capture accurately the genomic template diversity in the sample analyzed. Although our application described here involves the use of hairpin-bisulfite PCR for amplification of double-stranded DNA, the method can readily be adapted to single-strand PCR. Useful applications will include analyses of limited template DNA for biomedical, ancient DNA and forensic purposes.     

DNA recovery from ancient tissues: problems and perspectives

The recovery, amplification and sequencing of nucleic acids from ancient smaples opens new possibilities in many different fields, such as anthropology, archeaology, population genetics, animal and plant evolutionary studies, and forensic medicine. The sample processing for DNA extraction and PCR amplification represents the most delicate phase of ancient DNA analysis, with a major impact on the reproducibility and reliability of the results. In this paper some extraction protocols are reviewed and discussed, with particular reference to the removal of the inhibitory substances usually present in extract from ancient tissues. The effect of contamination from extraneous DNA, a possible source of misleading results, is discussed and guidelines to detect and circumvent the problem are given.     

方兴未艾的古代DNA的研究

保留在古代生物遗骸中的遗传物质DNA是一种重要的遗传资源。古代DNA的研究对于了解包括人类在内的各种生物的起源、进化和迁徙有重要意义。古代DNA的研究有其自身的特点,并且已经取得一系列重要成就。本文综述古代DNA研究的历史、方法和进展。 Abstract：DNA present in ancient samples can be recovered,amplified and analysed.It opens a new window for genetic analysis in many different disciplines,such as anthropology,archaeology,human population genetics,animal and plant evolutionary taxonomy and forensic science.In general,ancient DNA is rare in quantity,damaged in quality.To ensure the reproducibility and reliability of the results,great cares should be taken,such as various measurements against contamination and phylogenetic analysis of ancient DNA sequences.In this paper we review recovery,amplification and analysis of ancient DNA,also discuss the guidelines to ensure the authenticity of ancient DNA and the recent advances in ancient DNA study.     

Ancient DNA analysis of human populations

The use of ancient DNA (aDNA) in the reconstruction of population origins and evolution is becoming increasingly common. The resultant increase in number of samples and polymorphic sites assayed and the number of studies published may give the impression that all technological hurdles associated with aDNA technology have been overcome. However, analysis of aDNA is still plagued by two issues that emerged at the advent of aDNA technology, namely the inability to amplify a significant number of samples and the contamination of samples with modern DNA. Herein, we analyze five well-preserved skeletal specimens from the western United States dating from 800-1600 A.D. These specimens yielded DNA samples with levels of contamination ranging from 0-100%, as determined by the presence or absence of New World-specific mitochondrial markers. All samples were analyzed by a variety of protocols intended to assay genetic variability and detect contamination, including amplification of variously sized DNA targets, direct DNA sequence analysis of amplification products and sequence analysis of cloned amplification products, analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms, quantitation of target DNA, amino acid racemization, and amino acid quantitation. Only the determination of DNA sequence from a cloned amplification product clearly revealed the presence of both ancient DNA and contaminating DNA in the same extract. Our results demonstrate that the analysis of aDNA is still an excruciatingly slow and meticulous process. All experiments, including stringent quality and contamination controls, must be performed in an environment as free as possible of potential sources of contaminating DNA, including modern DNA extracts. Careful selection of polymorphic markers capable of discriminating between ancient DNA and probable DNA contaminants is critical. Research strategies must be designed with a goal of identifying all DNA contaminants in order to differentiate convincingly between contamination and endogenous DNA.     

Spiking of contemporary human template DNA with ancient DNA extracts induces mutations under PCR and generates nonauthentic mitochondrial sequences

Proof of authenticity is the greatest challenge in palaeogenetic research, and many safeguards have become standard routine in laboratories specialized on ancient DNA research. Here we describe an as-yet unknown source of artifacts that will require special attention in the future. We show that ancient DNA extracts on their own can have an inhibitory and mutagenic effect under PCR. We have spiked PCR reactions including known human test DNA with 14 selected ancient DNA extracts from human and nonhuman sources. We find that the ancient DNA extracts inhibit the amplification of large fragments to different degrees, suggesting that the usual control against contaminations, i.e., the absence of long amplifiable fragments, is not sufficient. But even more important, we find that the extracts induce mutations in a nonrandom fashion. We have amplified a 148-bp stretch of the mitochondrial HVRI from contemporary human template DNA in spiked PCR reactions. Subsequent analysis of 547 sequences from cloned amplicons revealed that the vast majority (76.97%) differed from the correct sequence by single nucleotide substitutions and/or indels. In total, 34 positions of a 103-bp alignment are affected, and most mutations occur repeatedly in independent PCR amplifications. Several of the induced mutations occur at positions that have previously been detected in studies of ancient hominid sequences, including the Neandertal sequences. Our data imply that PCR-induced mutations are likely to be an intrinsic and general problem of PCR amplifications of ancient templates. Therefore, ancient DNA sequences should be considered with caution, at least as long as the molecular basis for the extract-induced mutations is not understood.     

Proboscidean DNA from Museum and Fossil Specimens: An Assessment of Ancient DNA Extraction and Amplification Techniques

Applications of reliable DNA extraction and amplification techniques to postmortem samples are critical to ancient DNA research. Commonly used methods for isolating DNA from ancient material were tested and compared using both soft tissue and bones from fossil and contemporary museum proboscideans. DNAs isolated using three principal methods served as templates in subsequent PCR amplifications, and the PCR products were directly sequenced. Authentication of the ancient origin of obtained nucleotide sequences was established by demonstrating reproducibility under a blind testing system and by phylogenetic analysis. Our results indicate that ancient samples may respond differently to extraction buffers or purification procedures, and no single method was universally successful. A CTAB buffer method, modified from plant DNA extraction protocols, was found to have the highest success rate. Nested PCR was shown to be a reliable approach to amplify ancient DNA templates that failed in primary amplification.     

Molecular breeding of polymerases for amplification of ancient DNA

In the absence of repair, lesions accumulate in DNA. Thus, DNA persisting in specimens of paleontological, archaeological or forensic interest is inevitably damaged. We describe a strategy for the recovery of genetic information from damaged DNA. By molecular breeding of polymerase genes from the genus Thermus (Taq (Thermus aquaticus), Tth (Thermus thermophilus) and Tfl (Thermus flavus)) and compartmentalized self-replication selection, we have evolved polymerases that can extend single, double and even quadruple mismatches, process non-canonical primer-template duplexes and bypass lesions found in ancient DNA, such as hydantoins and abasic sites. Applied to the PCR amplification of 47,000-60,000-year-old cave bear DNA, these outperformed Taq DNA polymerase by up to 150% and yielded amplification products at sample dilutions at which Taq did not. Our results demonstrate that engineered polymerases can expand the recovery of genetic information from Pleistocene specimens and may benefit genetic analysis in paleontology, archeology and forensic medicine.     

Encoding PCR Products with Batch-stamps and Barcodes

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become the mainstay of DNA sequence analysis. Yet there is always uncertainty concerning the source of the template DNA that gave rise to a particular PCR product. The risks of contamination, biased amplification, and product redundancy are especially high when limited amounts of template DNA are used. We have developed and applied molecular encoding principles to solve this source-uncertainty problem for DNA sequences generated by standard PCR. Batch-stamps specify the date and sample identity, and barcodes detect template redundancy. Our approach thus enables classification of each PCR-derived sequence as valid, contaminant, or redundant, and provides a measure of sequence diversity. We recommend that batch-stamps and barcodes be used when amplifying irreplaceable DNAs and cDNAs available for forensic, clinical, single cell, and ancient DNA analyses.     

Co‐amplification of cytochrome b and D‐loop mtDNA fragments for the identification of degraded DNA samples

We propose a simple and effective approach to simultaneously co‐amplify both cytochrome b and D‐loop fragments to evaluate DNA preservation and to monitor possible contaminations in the analysis of degraded animal DNA samples. We have applied this approach to over 200 ancient salmon samples and 25 ancient whale DNA samples, clearly demonstrating its multiple benefits for analysis of degraded DNA samples, and the ease in which co‐amplification can be optimized for different taxa. This simple, cost‐efficient and genomic DNA‐saving approach can be used routinely in the analysis of minute and degraded DNA samples in wildlife forensics, food inspection, conservation biology and ancient faunal remains.     

Technical note: PCR analysis of minimum target amount of ancient DNA

The study of ancient DNA plays an important role in archaeological and palaeontological research as well as in pathology and forensics. Here, we present a new tool for ancient DNA analysis, which overcomes contamination problems, DNA degradation, and the negative effects of PCR inhibitors while reducing the amount of starting target material in the picogram range. Ancient bone samples from four Egyptian mummies were examined by combining laser microdissection, conventional DNA extraction, and low‐volume PCR. Initially, several bone particles (osteons) in the micrometer range were extracted by laser microdissection. Subsequently, ancient DNA amplification was performed to verify our extraction method. Amelogenin and β‐actin gene specific fragments were amplified via low‐volume PCR in a total reaction volume of 1 μl. Results of microdissected mummy DNA samples were compared to mummy DNA, which was extracted using a standard DNA extraction method based on pulverization of bone material. Our results highlight the combination of laser microdissection and low‐volume PCR as a promising new technique in ancient DNA analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.