A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

An IcmF Family Protein,ImpLM, Is an Integral Inner Membrane Protein Interacting with ImpKL,and Its Walker A Motif Is Required for Type VI Secretion System-Mediated Hcp Secretion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

An intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) family protein is a conserved component of a newly identified type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoded in many animal and plant-associated Proteobacteria. We have previously identified ImpL_M, an IcmF family protein that is required for the secretion of the T6SS substrate hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) from the plant-pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In this study, we characterized the topology of ImpL_M and the importance of its nucleotide-binding Walker A motif involved in Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens. A combination of β-lactamase-green fluorescent protein fusion and biochemical fractionation analyses revealed that ImpL_M is an integral polytopic inner membrane protein comprising three transmembrane domains bordered by an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal domain exposed to the periplasm. impL_M mutants with substitutions or deletions in the Walker A motif failed to complement the impL_M deletion mutant for Hcp secretion, which provided evidence that ImpL_M may bind and/or hydrolyze nucleoside triphosphates to mediate T6SS machine assembly and/or substrate secretion. Protein-protein interaction and protein stability analyses indicated that there is a physical interaction between ImpL_M and another essential T6SS component, ImpK_L. Topology and biochemical fractionation analyses suggested that ImpK_L is an integral bitopic inner membrane protein with an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal OmpA-like domain exposed to the periplasm. Further comprehensive yeast two-hybrid assays dissecting ImpL_M-ImpK_L interaction domains suggested that ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L via the N-terminal cytoplasmic domains of the proteins. In conclusion, ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L, and its Walker A motif is required for its function in mediation of Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens.Many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria employ protein secretion systems formed by macromolecular complexes to deliver proteins or protein-DNA complexes across the bacterial membrane. In addition to the general secretory (Sec) pathway (18, 52) and twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (7, 34), which transport proteins across the inner membrane into the periplasm, at least six distinct protein secretion systems occur in gram-negative bacteria (28, 46, 66). These systems are able to secrete proteins from the cytoplasm or periplasm to the external environment or the host cell and include the well-documented type I to type V secretion systems (T1SS to T5SS) (10, 15, 23, 26, 30) and a recently discovered type VI secretion system (T6SS) (4, 8, 22, 41, 48, 49). These systems use ATPase or a proton motive force to energize assembly of the protein secretion machinery and/or substrate translocation (2, 6, 41, 44, 60).Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogenic gram-negative bacterium that causes crown gall disease in a wide range of plants. Using an archetypal T4SS (9), A. tumefaciens translocates oncogenic transferred DNA and effector proteins to the host and ultimately integrates transferred DNA into the host genome. Because of its unique interkingdom DNA transfer, this bacterium has been extensively studied and used to transform foreign DNA into plants and fungi (11, 24, 40, 67). In addition to the T4SS, A. tumefaciens encodes several other secretion systems, including the Sec pathway, the Tat pathway, T1SS, T5SS, and the recently identified T6SS (72). T6SS is highly conserved and widely distributed in animal- and plant-associated Proteobacteria and plays an important role in the virulence of several human and animal pathogens (14, 19, 41, 48, 56, 63, 74). However, T6SS seems to play only a minor role or even a negative role in infection or virulence of the plant-associated pathogens or symbionts studied to date (5, 37-39, 72).T6SS was initially designated IAHP (IcmF-associated homologous protein) clusters (13). Before T6SS was documented by Pukatzki et al. in Vibrio cholerae (48), mutations in this gene cluster in the plant symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum (5) and the fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda (51) caused defects in protein secretion. In V. cholerae, T6SS was responsible for the loss of cytotoxicity for amoebae and for secretion of two proteins lacking a signal peptide, hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) and valine-glycine repeat protein (VgrG). Secretion of Hcp is the hallmark of T6SS. Interestingly, mutation of hcp blocks the secretion of VgrG proteins (VgrG-1, VgrG-2, and VgrG-3), and, conversely, vgrG-1 and vgrG-2 are both required for secretion of the Hcp and VgrG proteins from V. cholerae (47, 48). Similarly, a requirement of Hcp for VgrG secretion and a requirement of VgrG for Hcp secretion have also been shown for E. tarda (74). Because Hcp forms a hexameric ring (41) stacked in a tube-like structure in vitro (3, 35) and VgrG has a predicted trimeric phage tail spike-like structure similar to that of the T4 phage gp5-gp27 complex (47), Hcp and VgrG have been postulated to form an extracellular translocon. This model is further supported by two recent crystallography studies showing that Hcp, VgrG, and a T4 phage gp25-like protein resembled membrane penetration tails of bacteriophages (35, 45).Little is known about the topology and structure of T6SS machinery subunits and the distinction between genes encoding machinery subunits and genes encoding regulatory proteins. Posttranslational regulation via the phosphorylation of Fha1 by a serine-threonine kinase (PpkA) is required for Hcp secretion from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (42). Genetic evidence for P. aeruginosa suggested that the T6SS may utilize a ClpV-like AAA⁺ ATPase to provide the energy for machinery assembly or substrate translocation (41). A recent study of V. cholerae suggested that ClpV ATPase activity is responsible for remodeling the VipA/VipB tubules which are crucial for type VI substrate secretion (6). An outer membrane lipoprotein, SciN, is an essential T6SS component for mediating Hcp secretion from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (1). A systematic study of the T6SS machinery in E. tarda revealed that 13 of 16 genes in the evp gene cluster are essential for secretion of T6S substrates (74), which suggests the core components of the T6SS. Interestingly, most of the core components conserved in T6SS are predicted soluble proteins without recognizable signal peptide and transmembrane (TM) domains.The intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) and H (IcmH) proteins are among the few core components with obvious TM domains (8). In Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm T4SSb, IcmF and IcmH are both membrane localized and partially required for L. pneumophila replication in macrophages (58, 70, 75). IcmF and IcmH are thought to interact with each other in stabilizing the T4SS complex in L. pneumophila (58). In T6SS, IcmF is one of the essential components required for secretion of Hcp from several animal pathogens, including V. cholerae (48), Aeromonas hydrophila (63), E. tarda (74), and P. aeruginosa (41), as well as the plant pathogens A. tumefaciens (72) and Pectobacterium atrosepticum (39). In E. tarda, IcmF (EvpO) interacted with IcmH (EvpN), EvpL, and EvpA in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and its putative nucleotide-binding site (Walker A motif) was not essential for secretion of T6SS substrates (74).In this study, we characterized the topology and interactions of the IcmF and IcmH family proteins ImpL_M and ImpK_L, which are two essential components of the T6SS of A. tumefaciens. We adapted the nomenclature proposed by Cascales (8), using the annotated gene designation followed by the letter indicated by Shalom et al. (59). Our data indicate that ImpL_M and ImpK_L are both integral inner membrane proteins and interact with each other via their N-terminal domains residing in the cytoplasm. We also provide genetic evidence showing that ImpL_M may function as a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-binding protein or nucleoside triphosphatase to mediate T6S machinery assembly and/or substrate secretion.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Essential Role of the SycP Chaperone in Type III Secretion of the YspP Effector

The Ysa type III secretion (T3S) system enhances gastrointestinal infection by Yersinia enterocolitica bv. 1B. One effector protein targeted into host cells is YspP, a protein tyrosine phosphatase. It was determined in this study that the secretion of YspP requires a chaperone, SycP. Genetic analysis showed that deletion of sycP completely abolished the secretion of YspP without affecting the secretion of other Ysps by the Ysa T3S system. Analysis of the secretion and translocation signals of YspP defined the first 73 amino acids to form the minimal region of YspP necessary to promote secretion and translocation by the Ysa T3S system. Function of the YspP secretion/translocation signals was dependent on SycP. Curiously, when YspP was constitutively expressed in Y. enterocolitica bv. 1B, it was recognized and secreted by the Ysc T3S system and the flagellar T3S system. In these cases, the first 21 amino acids were sufficient to promote secretion, and while SycP did enhance secretion, it was not essential. However, neither the Ysc T3S system nor the flagellar T3S system translocated YspP into mammalian cells. This supports a model where SycP confers secretion/translocation specificities for YspP by the Ysa T3S system. A series of biochemical approaches further established that SycP specifically interacts with YspP and protected YspP degradation in the cell prior to secretion. Collectively, the evidence suggests that YspP secretion by the Ysa T3S system is a posttranslational event.Many gram-negative bacteria have evolved sophisticated delivery systems termed type III secretion (T3S) systems to transport effector proteins into the cytosols of eukaryotic host cells (10, 21, 22). The translocated effectors manipulate host cell activities in various ways, thereby permitting the establishment of a pathogenic or symbiotic interaction (20). T3S systems are ancestrally related to the flagellar T3S system, having in common a basal body spanning the inner and outer bacterial membranes responsible for the appropriate selection of polypeptides delivered into a hollow channel leading out of the bacterium. At the outer surface, flagellar polypeptides travel the length of the adjoining hook and filament, but in T3S systems, the secreted polypeptides pass through a special hollow needle that extends away from the bacterium to the targeted host cell (10, 21, 22). Heterologous multimeric proteins localized to the tip of the needle form the translocon, a porelike channel that is assembled in the eukaryotic plasma membrane, enabling the injection of bacterial effectors (24, 48, 51).Two terminologies are distinctly used to describe protein transport by T3S systems. While “secretion” is a transport event for proteins from the bacterial cytosol into the extracellular milieu, “translocation” is a transport event for proteins from the bacterial cytosol into the eukaryotic host''s cytosol. Generally, secretion but not translocation is mediated by the first 20 amino acids of effector proteins (41, 46, 47), albeit mRNA sequences at the N terminus of some proteins have been also considered to function as the secretion signals (3, 44). This secretion event is independent of the presence of cognate effector chaperones (46, 59). Despite no conservation of the amino acids among the secretion signals, amphipathic or disordered secondary structures of the peptides are thought to function as the secretion signals recognized by the T3S apparatuses (22, 34, 35). In contrast, translocation usually requires both the secretion (the first 20 amino acids) and the translocation (amino acids 20 to 100) signals (46, 47, 59). This translocation event is efficiently mediated by the presence of the cognate chaperones (9, 14, 30), and the chaperone-effector complexes have been proposed to function as the three-dimensional signals recognized by the T3S apparatuses (5, 33, 38, 49, 50).Many T3S effectors employ cognate chaperones in the bacterial cytoplasm (43, 57). The effector chaperones have been categorized into two subgroups, class 1A and class 1B, primarily based on the substrate properties (and the gene locations) (13, 43). Class 1A chaperones commonly bind to one effector, and most of them are encoded by genes located adjacent to the gene encoding the cognate effectors. In contrast, class 1B chaperones bind to multiple effectors and are encoded by genes located within operons that code for structural components of the T3S apparatus that are distant to the cognate effector genes. Evolutionally, this subgroup of chaperones is thought to be an archetype of effector chaperones. Although T3S effector chaperones lack primary sequence similarity even in same subgroup, overall the effector chaperones whose three-dimensional structures are solved share similar folds, consisting of three α-helices and five β-strands (5, 36, 38, 49, 54). Similarly, effector chaperones share the common biochemical characteristics of acidic properties (pI 4 to 5) and low molecular masses (12 to 15 kDa), with a tendency to form homodimers (43). These homodimers recognize the chaperone binding domains (CBD) of the cognate effectors, which are usually located in the amino-terminal 20 to 100 amino acids (translocation signal) of the effector (19, 30, 59). Despite the wealth of information about individual chaperones, a universally accepted model for the mechanisms by which they promote secretion is lacking. One study shows that the guidance of chaperone-effector complexes toward the T3S apparatus is provided by the affinity of their chaperones to the ATPase of the T3S apparatus, whereby the ATPase releases the chaperones from the complexes and then unfolds the cognate effector for secretion (2). Several additional functions of T3S effector chaperones have been reported, including the prevention of effector aggregation prior to delivery to the secretion system, limitation of premature interactions, and protection of effectors from protease degradation in bacterial cells (17, 43). When an organism has multiple T3S pathways, as is the case for some Yersinia spp., there is the opportunity to gain new insight into how a given chaperone might influence T3S system specificity for substrates. Without direct testing of the aforementioned mechanistic models, the role of a chaperone in T3S and how it affects the overall sequence of pathogenic events is, at best, a conjecture.Highly virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica bv. 1B have a total of three T3S systems. The first T3S system (Ysc) is encoded by the virulence plasmid, and it secretes six effectors termed Yops. Ysc T3S is important for systemic infection (11, 12, 42). This T3S system is common to all Yersinia species pathogenic to humans, including another enteropathogen, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and the plague pathogen Yersinia pestis. The second system (Ysa) is encoded by a cluster of genes mapping to the Ysa pathogenicity island (25, 53). The Ysa T3S system secretes a set of eight effectors termed Ysps and, interestingly, also secretes three Yops, YopE, YopN, and YopP/YopJ (39, 58, 61). This Ysa T3S system is restricted to clinical isolates of Y. enterocolitica bv. 1B and promotes the initial establishment of infection in gastrointestinal tissue (39, 55). The third T3S system is an integral part of the flagellum and secretes proteins termed Fops to the extracellular milieu (64).Previously, we identified the suite of Ysp proteins secreted by the Ysa T3S system (39). However, little is known about the detailed mechanism by which these proteins are secreted and translocated by this system. Among the Ysp proteins identified, YspP is a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) whose activity is required for full virulence (39). Here, we found a small open reading frame (ORF) immediately downstream of yspP and designated it sycP. The SycP protein was demonstrated to be a YspP-specific chaperone essential for both the secretion and the translocation of YspP by the Ysa T3S system. In addition, we also examined the secretion specificity requirements for YspP secretion by three different T3S systems as model cases. Interestingly, our data suggest that the mechanisms by which the secretion and translocation signals are recognized are different, depending on the type of T3S system examined.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Preinfection Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Failed To Prevent HIV Type 1 Infection from Strains Genetically Unrelated to Viruses in Long-Term Exposed Partners

Understanding the mechanisms underlying potential altered susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) individuals and the later clinical consequences of breakthrough infection can provide insight into strategies to control HIV-1 with an effective vaccine. From our Seattle ES cohort, we identified one individual (LSC63) who seroconverted after over 2 years of repeated unprotected sexual contact with his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 variants infecting LSC63 were genetically unrelated to those sequenced from P63. This may not be surprising, since viral load measurements in P63 were repeatedly below 50 copies/ml, making him an unlikely transmitter. However, broad HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses were detected in LSC63 before seroconversion. Compared to those detected after seroconversion, these responses were of lower magnitude and half of them targeted different regions of the viral proteome. Strong HLA-B27-restricted CTLs, which have been associated with disease control, were detected in LSC63 after but not before seroconversion. Furthermore, for the majority of the protein-coding regions of the HIV-1 variants in LSC63 (except gp41, nef, and the 3′ half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the viruses to which he was exposed through P63 (termed the exposed virus) were comparable to the distances between random subtype B HIV-1 sequences and the exposed viruses. These results suggest that broad preinfection immune responses were not able to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection in LSC63, even though the infecting viruses were not particularly distant from the viruses that may have elicited these responses.Understanding the mechanisms of altered susceptibility or control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) persons may provide invaluable information aiding the design of HIV-1 vaccines and therapy (9, 14, 15, 33, 45, 57, 58). In a cohort of female commercial sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, a small proportion of individuals remained seronegative for over 3 years despite the continued practice of unprotected sex (12, 28, 55, 56). Similarly, resistance to HIV-1 infection has been reported in homosexual men who frequently practiced unprotected sex with infected partners (1, 15, 17, 21, 61). Multiple factors have been associated with the resistance to HIV-1 infection in ES individuals (32), including host genetic factors (8, 16, 20, 37-39, 44, 46, 47, 49, 59, 63), such as certain HLA class I and II alleles (41), as well as cellular (1, 15, 26, 55, 56), humoral (25, 29), and innate immune responses (22, 35).Seroconversion in previously HIV-resistant Nairobi female commercial sex workers, despite preexisting HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses, has been reported (27). Similarly, 13 of 125 ES enrollees in our Seattle ES cohort (1, 15, 17) have become late seroconverters (H. Zhu, T. Andrus, Y. Liu, and T. Zhu, unpublished observations). Here, we analyze the virology, genetics, and immune responses of HIV-1 infection in one of the later seroconverting subjects, LSC63, who had developed broad CTL responses before seroconversion.     

Detection of Toxoplasma gondii Oocysts in Water Sample Concentrates by Real-Time PCR

PCR techniques in combination with conventional parasite concentration procedures have potential for the sensitive and specific detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in water. Three real-time PCR assays based on the B1 gene and a 529-bp repetitive element were analyzed for the detection of T. gondii tachyzoites and oocysts. Lower sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the B1 gene-based PCR than with the 529-bp repeat-based PCR. New procedures for the real-time PCR detection of T. gondii oocysts in concentrates of surface water were developed and tested in conjunction with a method for the direct extraction of inhibitor-free DNA from water. This technique detected as few as one oocyst seeded to 0.5 ml of packed pellets from water samples concentrated by Envirocheck filters. Thus, this real-time PCR may provide a detection method alternative to the traditional mouse assay and microscopy.Toxoplasma gondii is a ubiquitous parasite found in all classes of warm-blooded vertebrates. Nearly one-third of humans have been exposed to this parasite (15). In immunocompetent adults, acute infection normally results in transient influenza-like symptoms, but in immunocompromised persons retinochoroiditis and encephalitis are more common. Infected individuals can retain the parasite as quiescent tissue cysts for long periods, but invasive infection can occur if the immune status of the infected person deteriorates (42). If women become infected during pregnancy, the parasite can cause abortion or seriously damage the fetus. The potential morbidity from the ingestion of oocysts of T. gondii and the organism''s low infectious dose are a great concern for public health. There are at least four reported waterborne outbreaks of toxoplasmosis (2, 3, 14, 44), and endemic toxoplasmosis in Brazil is associated with the consumption of water or ice contaminated with T. gondii oocysts (1, 23), demonstrating the potential for the waterborne transmission of this disease (15).There is no rapid detection method for T. gondii oocysts recovered from water or other environmental samples. Traditionally, the detection of protozoa in water required their concentration from large volumes of water by filtration or centrifugation, isolation from concentrated particulates by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) or other methods, and detection by immunofluorescence microscopy, the infection of cultured cells, biochemistry, animal infection tests, molecular techniques, or combinations of these (17, 58). For T. gondii oocysts there are no commercially available IMS techniques, no widely available immunofluorescent staining reagents, and no standardized cultivation protocols. The identification of oocysts from environmental samples has included differential floatation and mouse inoculation (27). Recently, IMS techniques have been developed for the isolation of T. gondii oocysts and sporocysts in water (16, 18). Both the oocyst and sporocyst IMS assays, however, had poor specificity, because antibodies cross-reacted with water debris and the sporocyst wall of Hammondia hammondi, Hammondia heydorni, and Neospora caninum (16).PCR is becoming a favored technique for the detection of T. gondii oocysts in water (32, 35, 36, 46, 49, 55) over the conventional mouse bioassay (27, 55), as it reduces the detection time from weeks to 1 to 2 days. Although they have been developed for the detection of T. gondii in clinical specimens (50), no real-time PCR assays have been adapted for the detection of oocysts in water samples, possibly because of expected high concentrations of PCR inhibitors and low numbers of T. gondii oocysts in environmental samples (55).There are several unresolved issues regarding the effectiveness of the PCR detection of T. gondii oocysts in water. The most readily available method for the isolation of T. gondii oocysts from water samples is flocculation or sucrose floatation prior to DNA extraction (35, 36, 49, 55). Because sucrose flotation and flocculation result in oocyst losses, the recovery rate of using these methods is poor. For DNA extraction, the phenol-chloroform method or QIAamp mini kit frequently is used (16, 35, 36, 46, 55). When oocysts are recovered from water either by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) information collection rule method (53) or EPA Method 1623 (54) without purification by IMS, neither the conventional phenol-chloroform DNA extraction nor the QIAamp mini kit is effective at removing PCR inhibitors (30, 55, 57).Recently, a method was used effectively in the analysis of Cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water, storm water, and wastewater samples (30). This method extracted DNA directly from water concentrates without pathogen IMS, differential flotation, or enrichment cultures, and it utilized a commercial DNA extraction kit, the FastDNA spin kit for soil, and a high concentration of nonacetylated bovine serum albumin in PCR. The FastDNA soil kit has a higher capacity for PCR inhibitor removal than several other commercial extraction kits designed for environmental samples. The use of nonacetylated bovine serum in the PCR neutralizes residual PCR inhibitors that are coextracted with the DNA (30).In the present study, the performance of two published LightCycler real-time PCR assays based on the multicopy B1 gene and 529-bp repetitive element (13, 45) and a newly developed LightCycler real-time PCR assay using a common primer set were analyzed for the detection of T. gondii, using pure DNA and DNA extracted by the aforementioned extraction method (30) from water sample concentrates seeded with known number of oocysts.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Inhibition of Selenium Metabolism in the Oral Pathogen Treponema denticola

In this report we provide evidence that the antimicrobial action of stannous salts and a gold drug, auranofin, against Treponema denticola is mediated through inhibition of the metabolism of selenium for synthesis of selenoproteins.The biological use of selenium as a catalyst, incorporated into proteins as selenocysteine, is broad. It plays an essential role in energy metabolism, redox balance, and reproduction in a variety of organisms, from bacterial pathogens to eukaryotic parasites to humans. The results of several epidemiological studies indicate that higher levels of selenium in the mammalian diet can have a negative effect on dental health (2, 17-19, 39). Although the impact of selenium is attributed to its influence on the physical properties of the enamel surface (10), the role of selenium in supporting the oral microbial community has not been studied.The oral cavity is a highly complex microbiome, with a large proportion of its residents uncharacterized due to their fastidious nature and resistance to traditional culture methods (11). Analysis of whole saliva indicates that bacterial metabolism influences the amino acid composition and indicates a role for amino acid fermentation (38). Curtis et al. demonstrated the occurrence of Stickland reactions in dental plaque (9). These reactions were first described in clostridia (35-37). They involve the coupled fermentation of amino acids in which one amino acid is oxidized (Stickland donor) and another (Stickland acceptor) is reduced (29). Treponema denticola, an established resident of the oral cavity, performs Stickland reactions via the selenoprotein glycine reductase (32). Glycine reductase is composed of a multiprotein complex that contains two separate selenoproteins, termed selenoprotein A and selenoprotein B (1, 7, 8, 15, 16). This complex of proteins converts glycine to acetyl phosphate by using inorganic phosphate and the reducing potential from thioredoxin. For the organisms that use this complex, this is a vital source of ATP. Thus far, the requirement for selenocysteine at the active site of this enzyme complex is universally conserved, even though all other selenoproteins that have been identified using computational techniques have a putative cysteine homologue (24).Treponema denticola is considered one of the primary pathogens responsible for periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease that is the major cause of adult tooth loss (11, 27, 33). It is the best-studied oral spirochete, commonly found with other spirochetes within the periodontal pocket. It expresses a variety of virulence factors and is capable of adhering to and penetrating endothelial cell monolayers (31). Its health impact may reach beyond the oral cavity. A recent study linked periodontitis with peripheral arterial disease and detected T. denticola, along with other periodontal pathogens, in atherosclerotic plaque (3). Sequence analysis indicates the presence of several selenoproteins in addition to glycine reductase within the genome of T. denticola (24). This organism exhibits a strict growth requirement for selenium (32).A significant literature exists that clearly demonstrates the antimicrobial activity of fluoride compounds against microorganisms associated with dental decay and periodontitis. Both sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride, as well as stannous ions alone, inhibit the growth of T. denticola (21). The inhibitory effect of stannous salts on T. denticola''s growth is unexplained. It should be noted that toothpastes containing stannous fluoride are more effective in reducing gingivitis and plaque (28, 30).Tin, as well as several other trace elements, modulates the effects of acute selenium toxicity (20). Conversely, selenium affects the activity of tin in animal models (4-6). In this study, we examine the possibility that stannous ions interfere with selenium metabolism in T. denticola.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.