Control of Cell Survival and Proliferation by Mammalian Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B

Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5′UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.Targeting the translation initiation pathway is emerging as a potential therapy for inhibiting cancer cell growth (35, 38). Ribosome recruitment to the 5′ ends of eukaryotic mRNAs proceeds via translation initiation mechanisms that are dependent either on the 5′ cap structure (m⁷GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) or an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The majority of translation initiation events in eukaryotes are mediated through cap-dependent translation whereby the 40S ribosomal subunit is recruited to the vicinity of the mRNA 5′ cap structure by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex. eIF4F is comprised of eIF4E (the cap-binding subunit), eIF4A (an RNA helicase), and eIF4G (a large scaffolding protein for eIF4E, eIF4A, and other initiation factors). Once assembled at the 5′ cap, the 40S ribosomal subunit in association with several initiation factors scans the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA until it encounters a start codon in a favorable context, followed by polypeptide synthesis (37).Early in vitro studies have shown that the initiation factor eIF4B acts to potentiate ribosome recruitment to the mRNA (3, 45). eIF4B stimulates translation of both capped and uncapped mRNAs in vitro (1, 36). This function is exerted through stimulation of the helicase activity of eIF4A (43), possibly through direct interactions with eIF4A (44) or with mRNA, the ribosome-associated eIF3, and 18S rRNA (28, 29, 44). Thus, eIF4B is thought to form auxiliary bridges between the mRNA and the 40S ribosomal subunit. Toeprinting studies using mammalian eIF4B underscored its importance in the assembly of the 48S initiation complex, especially on mRNAs harboring secondary structures in the 5′UTRs (11).In vivo studies of eIF4B are limited. Ectopic expression of eIF4B in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells and in developing eye imaginal discs stimulated cell proliferation (16). Enhanced cell proliferation is most likely mediated by increased translation of a subset of mRNAs, since knockdown of Drosophila eIF4B by RNA interference (RNAi) caused a modest reduction in global translation but compromised the survival of insect cells grown under low serum conditions (16). Studies of eIF4B in mammalian cells yielded contradictory results. Transient overexpression of eIF4B stimulated translation initiation in a phosphorylation-dependent manner in some cells (18, 49) while inhibiting translation in others (30, 31, 41). These differences might be attributed to disparate levels of eIF4B overexpression.To address the physiological role of eIF4B in mRNA translation in the cell, RNAi knockdown of eIF4B was used here. We demonstrate that eIF4B is required for optimal translation. Importantly, the translation of mRNAs bearing structured 5′UTRs, such as the cell cycle regulators Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), and the antiapoptotic factors Bcl-2 and XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), was reduced as a result of eIF4B silencing by RNAi. Furthermore, eIF4B silencing promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis. Thus, we show that mammalian eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival, whereby it acts by regulating the translation of a functionally related subset of mRNAs.     

Evidence for Translational Regulation by the Herpes Simplex Virus Virion Host Shutoff Protein

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by gene UL41 is an mRNA-specific RNase that triggers accelerated degradation of host and viral mRNAs in infected cells. We report here that vhs is also able to modulate reporter gene expression without greatly altering the levels of the target mRNA in transient-transfection assays conducted in HeLa cells. We monitored the effects of vhs on a panel of bicistronic reporter constructs bearing a variety of internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) located between two test cistrons. As expected, vhs inhibited the expression of the 5′ cistrons of all of these constructs; however, the response of the 3′ cistron varied with the IRES: expression driven from the wild-type EMCV IRES was strongly suppressed, while expression controlled by a mutant EMCV IRES and the cellular ApaF1, BiP, and DAP5 IRES elements was strongly activated. In addition, several HSV type 1 (HSV-1) 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) sequences also served as positive vhs response elements in this assay. IRES activation was also observed in 293 and HepG2 cells, but no such response was observed in Vero cells. Mutational analysis has yet to uncouple the ability of vhs to activate 3′ cistron expression from its shutoff activity. Remarkably, repression of 5′ cistron expression could be observed under conditions where the levels of the reporter RNA were not correspondingly reduced. These data provide strong evidence that vhs can modulate gene expression at the level of translation and that it is able to activate cap-independent translation through specific cis-acting elements.The virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by herpes simplex virus (HSV) gene UL41 is an endoribonuclease that is packaged into the tegument of mature HSV virions. Once delivered into the cytoplasm of newly infected cells, vhs triggers shutoff of host protein synthesis, disruption of preexisting polysomes, and degradation of host mRNAs (reviewed in reference 62). The vhs-dependent shutoff system destabilizes many cellular and viral mRNAs (36, 46, 67). The rapid decline in host mRNA levels presumably helps viral mRNAs gain access to the cellular translational apparatus. In addition, the relatively short half-lives of viral mRNAs contribute to the sharp transitions between the successive phases of viral protein synthesis by tightly coupling changes in the rates of synthesis of viral mRNAs to altered mRNA levels (46). These effects enhance virus replication and may account for the modest reduction in virus yield displayed by vhs mutants in cultured Vero cells (55, 61).vhs also plays a critical role in HSV pathogenesis: vhs mutants are severely impaired for replication in the corneas and central nervous systems of mice and cannot efficiently establish or reactivate from latency (63, 65, 66). Mounting evidence indicates that this attenuation stems at least in part from an impaired ability to disarm elements of the innate and adaptive host immune responses (reviewed in reference 62). For example, vhs suppresses certain innate cellular antiviral responses, including production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (68); dampens the type I interferon system (11, 45, 49, 78); and blocks activation of dendritic cells (58). Moreover, vhs mutants display enhanced virulence in knockout mice lacking type I interferon (IFN) receptors (37, 45) or Stat1 (48) and are hypersensitive to the antiviral effects of IFN in some cells in tissue culture (11, 49, 68). Thus, vhs is arguably a bona fide virulence factor.vhs present in extracts of HSV virions or purified from bacteria has nonspecific RNase activity capable of degrading all RNA substrates (15, 70, 71, 79). However, vhs is highly selective in vivo, targeting mRNAs and sparing other cytoplasmic RNAs (36, 46). In vivo and in mammalian whole-cell extracts, vhs-induced decay of at least some mRNAs initiates near regions of translation initiation and proceeds in an overall 5′-to-3′ direction (12, 13, 29, 52). Moreover, vhs binds to the translation initiation factors eIF4H, eIF4B, and eIF4A II, all components of the cap recognition factor eIF4F (10, 16, 17). Thus, it has been proposed that vhs selectively targets actively translated mRNAs through interactions with eIF4F components (17). Consistent with this hypothesis, recent data document that eIF4H is required for vhs activity in vivo (59).A previous report from this laboratory documented that the internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) of the picornaviruses poliovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) strongly target vhs-induced RNA cleavage events to sequences immediately 3′ to the IRES in an in vitro translation system derived from rabbit reticulocyte lysates (RRL) (13). IRES elements are highly structured RNA sequences that are able to direct cap-independent translational initiation (reviewed in references 21, 25, 30, and 64). In the case of the poliovirus and EMCV elements, this is achieved by directly recruiting the eIF4F scaffolding protein eIF4G, thus bypassing the requirement for the cap-binding eIF4F subunit, eIF4E (reviewed in reference 30). Based on these data, we suggested that vhs is strongly targeted to the picornavirus IRES elements via interactions with eIF4 factors.A growing number of cellular mRNAs have been proposed to bear IRES elements in their 5′ untranslated regions (5′ UTRs). These include many that are involved in cellular stress responses, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression (24, 64, 74). Given the striking ability of picornavirus IRES elements to target vhs RNase activity in vitro, we asked whether viral and cellular IRES elements are able to modify the susceptibility of mRNAs to vhs in vivo. During the course of preliminary experiments designed to test this hypothesis, we unexpectedly discovered that vhs is able to strongly activate gene expression controlled by some cellular IRES elements and HSV 5′ UTR sequences in in vivo bicistronic reporter assays. These observations are the subject of the present report.     

Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Promotes Rho-Dependent Focal Adhesion Formation by Suppressing p190A RhoGAP

Cell migration is critical for normal development and for pathological processes including cancer cell metastasis. Dynamic remodeling of focal adhesions and the actin cytoskeleton are crucial determinants of cell motility. The Rho family and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) module consisting of MEK-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are important regulators of these processes, but mechanisms for the integration of these signals during spreading and motility are incompletely understood. Here we show that ERK activity is required for fibronectin-stimulated Rho-GTP loading, Rho-kinase function, and the maturation of focal adhesions in spreading cells. We identify p190A RhoGAP as a major target for ERK signaling in adhesion assembly and identify roles for ERK phosphorylation of the C terminus in p190A localization and activity. These observations reveal a novel role for ERK signaling in adhesion assembly in addition to its established role in adhesion disassembly.Cell migration is a highly coordinated process essential for physiological and pathological processes (69). Signaling through Rho family GTPases (e.g., Rac, Cdc42, and Rho) is crucial for cell migration. Activated Rac and Cdc42 are involved in the production of a dominant lamellipodium and filopodia, respectively, whereas Rho-stimulated contractile forces are required for tail retraction and to maintain adhesion to the matrix (57, 58, 68). Rac- and Cdc42-dependent membrane protrusions are driven by the actin cytoskeleton and the formation of peripheral focal complexes; Rho activation stabilizes protrusions by stimulating the formation of mature focal adhesions and stress fibers. Active Rho influences cytoskeletal dynamics through effectors including the Rho kinases (ROCKs) (2, 3).Rho activity is stimulated by GEFs that promote GTP binding and attenuated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that enhance Rho''s intrinsic GTPase activity. However, due to the large number of RhoGEFs and RhoGAPs expressed in mammalian cells, the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulation of Rho activity in time and space are incompletely understood. p190A RhoGAP (hereafter p190A) is implicated in adhesion and migration signaling. p190A contains an N-terminal GTPase domain, a large middle domain juxtaposed to the C-terminal GAP domain, and a short C-terminal tail (74). The C-terminal tail of ∼50 amino acids is divergent between p190A and the closely related family member p190B (14) and thus may specify the unique functional roles for p190A and p190B revealed in gene knockout studies (10, 11, 41, 77, 78). p190A activity is dynamically regulated in response to external cues during cell adhesion and migration (5, 6, 59). Arthur et al. (5) reported that p190A activity is required for the transient decrease in RhoGTP levels seen in fibroblasts adhering to fibronectin. p190A activity is positively regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation (4, 5, 8, 17, 31, 39, 40, 42): phosphorylation at Y1105 promotes its association with p120RasGAP and subsequent recruitment to membranes or cytoskeleton (8, 17, 27, 31, 71, 75, 84). However, Y1105 phosphorylation is alone insufficient to activate p190A GAP activity (39). While the functions of p190A can be irreversibly terminated by ubiquitinylation in a cell-cycle-dependent manner (80), less is known about reversible mechanisms that negatively regulate p190A GAP activity during adhesion and motility.The integration of Rho family GTPase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling is important for cell motility (48, 50, 63, 76, 79). Several studies have demonstrated a requirement for ERK signaling in the disassembly of focal adhesions in migrating cells, in part through the activation of calpain proteases (36, 37) that can downregulate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling (15), locally suppress Rho activity (52), and sever cytoskeletal linkers to focal adhesions (7, 33). Inhibition of ERK signaling increases focal adhesion size and retards disassembly of focal adhesions in adherent cells (57, 64, 85, 86). It is also recognized that ERK modulates Rho-dependent cellular processes, including membrane protrusion and migration (18, 25, 64, 86). Interestingly, ERK activated in response to acute fibronectin stimulation localizes not only to mature focal adhesions, but also to peripheral focal complexes (32, 76). Since these complexes can either mature or be turned over (12), ERK may play a distinct role in focal adhesion assembly. ERK is proposed to promote focal adhesion formation by activating myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) (21, 32, 50).Here we find that ERK activity is required for Rho activation and focal adhesion formation during adhesion to fibronectin and that p190A is an essential target of ERK signaling in this context. Inspection of the p190A C terminus reveals a number of consensus ERK sites and indeed p190A is phosphorylated by recombinant ERK only on its C terminus in vitro, and on the same C-terminal peptide in vivo. Mutation of the C-terminal ERK phosphorylation sites to alanine increases the biochemical and biological activity of p190A. Finally, inhibition of MEK or mutation of the C-terminal phosphorylation sites enhances retention of p190A in peripheral membranes during spreading on fibronectin. Our data support the conclusion that ERK phosphorylation inhibits p190A allowing increases in RhoGTP and cytoskeletal changes necessary for focal adhesion formation.     

A Role for p38 Stress-Activated Protein Kinase in Regulation of Cell Growth via TORC1

The target of rapamycin (TOR) complex 1 (TORC1) signaling pathway is a critical regulator of translation and cell growth. To identify novel components of this pathway, we performed a kinome-wide RNA interference (RNAi) screen in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. RNAi targeting components of the p38 stress-activated kinase cascade prevented the cell size increase elicited by depletion of the TOR negative regulator TSC2. In mammalian and Drosophila tissue culture, as well as in Drosophila ovaries ex vivo, p38-activating stresses, such as H₂O₂ and anisomycin, were able to activate TORC1. This stress-induced TORC1 activation could be blocked by RNAi against mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 and 6 (MKK3/6) or by the overexpression of dominant negative Rags. Interestingly, p38 was also required for the activation of TORC1 in response to amino acids and growth factors. Genetic ablation either of p38b or licorne, its upstream kinase, resulted in small flies consisting of small cells. Mutants with mutations in licorne or p38b are nutrition sensitive; low-nutrient food accentuates the small-organism phenotypes, as well as the partial lethality of the p38b null allele. These data suggest that p38 is an important positive regulator of TORC1 in both mammalian and Drosophila systems in response to certain stresses and growth factors.The target of rapamycin, TOR, is a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase that is a critical regulator of cell growth. It is a core component of two signaling complexes, TORC1 and TORC2 (60, 74). TORC1 is defined by the presence of Raptor in the complex, while TORC2 contains Rictor. Rictor and Raptor are mutually exclusive. Activation of the TORC1 pathway leads to increased protein translation, increased cell size, and increased proliferation, making this pathway an important target for emerging cancer therapies. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of TORC1 that is commonly used as an immunosuppressant following kidney transplantation (51). At least three analogs of rapamycin are currently being tested in solid and hematological tumors and have shown some promising results (21).The TORC1 pathway responds to numerous inputs, sensing both the desirability of and the capacity for growth. Many of these pathways control TORC1 signaling through phosphorylation of the tuberous sclerosis protein TSC2. TSC2 associates with TSC1 to form a heterodimeric GTPase-activating protein complex (GAP) that inactivates the small GTPase Rheb (24, 29, 67). While the exact molecular mechanism remains a topic of debate, activation of Rheb promotes the kinase activity of TORC1 (24, 29, 67). Rheb is required for the activation of TORC1 in response to both amino acids and growth factors (55, 62). In Drosophila melanogaster, mutation of either TOR or Rheb inhibits growth, leading to reduced body size and reduced cell size in mutant clones (42, 64). Mutation of either TSC1 or TSC2 has the predicted opposite effect, as tissue deficient for either of these proteins overgrows and contains large cells (49, 66).TORC1 is activated via the phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase (PI3′K) pathway by growth-promoting mitogens, such as insulin and growth factors. Drosophila mutants with mutations of PI3′K pathway components have size phenotypes similar to those of the TOR and Rheb mutants (71). In mammalian cells, the PI3′K-mediated activation of TORC1 occurs at least in part through the phosphorylation of TSC2 by the PI3′K target AKT (30, 50). Interestingly, mutation of these residues in Drosophila has no impact on TSC2 function in vivo, suggesting that there may be other mechanisms through which PI3′K can activate Drosophila TOR (20). Recent work has suggested that the proline-rich AKT substrate PRAS40 may provide part of this link (23, 59, 69, 70). In addition, signaling through RAS activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), which can phosphorylate TSC2 and Raptor to activate TORC1 (13, 40, 56). There are also likely to be additional mechanisms through which growth factors activate Drosophila TOR that have not yet been identified.TORC1 activity is also controlled by the intracellular building blocks necessary to support cellular growth. The energy-sensing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway relays information about the energy status of the cell to TORC1 by phosphorylating TSC2. Unlike the inactivating phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt, phosphorylation of TSC2 by AMPK promotes the GAP activity of the TSC complex (31). AMPK also phosphorylates Raptor, leading to decreased TORC1 activity (28). Thus, when energy levels are low, active AMPK inhibits TORC1.Amino acids also activate the TORC1 pathway, through a mechanism that requires Rheb, as well as the type III PI3′K VPS34 and the serine/threonine kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP4K3) (11, 22, 43). TORC1 thereby integrates information about the availability of amino acids and the amount of energy available for growth with growth factor signaling. Given its ancient function in adapting growth rates to environmental conditions, it is likely that TOR responds to a variety of stimuli, suggesting that many TOR control mechanisms remain to be uncovered. The Rag family of Ras-related small GTPases has recently been identified as a key component of the amino acid-sensing pathway, acting in parallel to Rheb (34, 58). Rag GTPases form heterodimers; RagA or RagB interacts with RagC or RagD. RagA and RagB are active when GTP bound, while RagC and RagD are active when bound to GDP (34, 58). Activation of the Rags by amino acids results in TOR relocalization to Rab7-containing vesicles (58). While the function of these vesicles in TORC1 signaling remains unclear, this relocalization is associated with increased TORC1 activity.TORC1 controls cell growth and translation through the phosphorylation and activation of components of the translational machinery, such as S6 kinase (S6K) and 4EBP1, an inhibitor of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) activity (reviewed in reference 27). S6K phosphorylates the S6 ribosomal subunit, thereby increasing translation. Mice deficient for S6K1 are small and have small pancreatic beta cells and a correspondingly low level of circulating insulin (45). Mutation of the phosphorylation sites on S6 results in a similar phenotype, with small beta cells and fibroblasts (57). In Drosophila, mutation of S6K again reduces both cell and organism size (42), as does the overexpression of 4EBP (41).Interestingly, while mutation of the TORC1 pathway in mammalian cells reduces cell size by 10 to 15%, ablation of core TORC1 pathway components in Drosophila cells can affect cell size by up to 40% (73). In an attempt to identify novel components of the TORC1 pathway, we undertook an RNA interference (RNAi)-based screen of Drosophila S2 cells. We reasoned that the extreme size phenotypes observed in Drosophila cells upon TORC1 manipulations would facilitate the identification of modulators. In order to increase the likelihood of isolating novel regulators of TOR, we uncoupled TOR activity from many of its known nutritional controls by depleting TSC2 and screened for double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) that could reverse the cell size increase elicited by loss of TSC2. Depletion of multiple components of the p38 pathway was found to revert the TSC2 RNAi-induced cell size increase. Furthermore, activation of p38 is necessary and sufficient for the activation of TOR. Strikingly, mutation of components of the stress-activated p38 pathway in Drosophila has a similar phenotype to mutations in the TOR and insulin signaling pathway: a cell-autonomous cell size decrease, reduced body size, and a sensitization to the effects of nutritional stress.     

African Swine Fever Virus Protein p17 Is Essential for the Progression of Viral Membrane Precursors toward Icosahedral Intermediates

The first morphological evidence of African swine fever virus (ASFV) assembly is the appearance of precursor viral membranes, thought to derive from the endoplasmic reticulum, within the assembly sites. We have shown previously that protein p54, a viral structural integral membrane protein, is essential for the generation of the viral precursor membranes. In this report, we study the role of protein p17, an abundant transmembrane protein localized at the viral internal envelope, in these processes. Using an inducible virus for this protein, we show that p17 is essential for virus viability and that its repression blocks the proteolytic processing of polyproteins pp220 and pp62. Electron microscopy analyses demonstrate that when the infection occurs under restrictive conditions, viral morphogenesis is blocked at an early stage, immediately posterior to the formation of the viral precursor membranes, indicating that protein p17 is required to allow their progression toward icosahedral particles. Thus, the absence of this protein leads to an accumulation of these precursors and to the delocalization of the major components of the capsid and core shell domains. The study of ultrathin serial sections from cells infected with BA71V or the inducible virus under permissive conditions revealed the presence of large helicoidal structures from which immature particles are produced, suggesting that these helicoidal structures represent a previously undetected viral intermediate.African swine fever virus (ASFV) (61, 72) is the only known DNA-containing arbovirus and the sole member of the Asfarviridae family (24). Infection by this virus of its natural hosts, the wild swine warthogs and bushpigs and the argasid ticks of the genus Ornithodoros, results in a mild disease, often asymptomatic, with low viremia titers, that in many cases develops into a persistent infection (3, 43, 71). In contrast, infection of domestic pigs leads to a lethal hemorrhagic fever for which the only available methods of disease control are the quarantine of the affected area and the elimination of the infected animals (51).The ASFV genome is a lineal molecule of double-stranded DNA of 170 to 190 kbp in length with convalently closed ends and terminal inverted repeats. The genome encodes more than 150 open reading frames, half of which lack any known or predictable function (16, 75).The virus particle, with an overall icosahedral shape and an average diameter of 200 nm (11), is organized in several concentric layers (6, 11, 15) containing more than 50 structural proteins (29). Intracellular particles are formed by an inner viral core, which contains the central nucleoid surrounded by a thick protein coat, referred to as core shell. This core is enwrapped by an inner lipid envelope (7, 34) on top of which the icosahedral capsid is assembled (26, 27, 31). Extracellular virions possess an additional membrane acquired during the budding from the plasma membrane (11). Both forms of the virus, intracellular and extracellular, are infective (8).The assembly of ASFV particles occurs in the cytoplasm of the infected cell, in viral factories located close to the cell nucleus (6, 13, 49). ASFV factories possess several characteristics similar to those of the cellular aggresomes (35), which are accumulations of aggregates of cellular proteins that form perinuclear inclusions (44).Current models propose that ASFV assembly begins with the modification of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, which are subsequently recruited to the viral factories and transformed into viral precursor membranes. These ER-derived viral membranes represent the precursors of the inner viral envelope and are the first morphological evidence of viral assembly (7, 60). ASFV viral membrane precursors evolve into icosahedral intermediates and icosahedral particles by the progressive assembly of the outer capsid layer at the convex face of the precursor membranes (5, 26, 27, 31) through an ATP- and calcium-dependent process (19). At the same time, the core shell is formed underneath the concave face of the viral envelope, and the viral DNA and nucleoproteins are packaged and condensed to form the innermost electron-dense nucleoid (6, 9, 12, 69). However, the assembly of the capsid and the internal envelope appears to be largely independent of the components of the core of the particle, since the absence of the viral polyprotein pp220 during assembly produces empty virus-like particles that do not contain the core (9).Comparative genome analysis suggests that ASFV shares a common origin with the members of the proposed nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) (40, 41). The reconstructed phylogeny of NCLDVs as well as the similitude in the structures and organizations of the genomes indicates that ASFV is more closely related to poxviruses than to other members of the NCLDVs. A consensus about the origin and nature of the envelope of the immature form of vaccinia virus (VV), the prototypical poxvirus, seems to be emerging (10, 17, 20, 54). VV assembly starts with the appearance of crescent-shaped structures within specialized regions of the cytoplasm also known as viral factories (21, 23). The crescent membranes originate from preexisting membranes derived from some specialized compartment of the ER (32, 37, 52, 53, 67), and an operative pathway from the ER to the crescent membrane has recently been described (38, 39). VV crescents apparently grow in length while maintaining the same curvature until they become closed circles, spheres in three dimensions, called immature virions (IV) (22). The uniform curvature is produced by a honeycomb lattice of protein D13L (36, 70), which attaches rapidly to the membranes so that nascent viral membranes always appear to be coated over their entirety. The D13L protein is evolutionarily related to the capsid proteins of the other members of the NCLDV group, including ASFV, but lacks the C-terminal jelly roll motif (40). This structural difference is probably related to the fact that poxviruses are the only member of this group without an icosahedral capsid; instead, the spherical D13L coat acts as a scaffold during the IV stage but is discarded in subsequent steps of morphogenesis (10, 28, 46, 66). Thus, although crescents in VV and precursors of the inner envelope in ASFV are the first morphogenetic stages discernible in the viral factories of these viruses, they seem to be different in nature. Crescents are covered by the D13L protein and are more akin to the icosahedral intermediates of ASFV assembly, whereas ASFV viral membrane precursors are more similar to the naked membranes seen when VV morphogenesis is arrested by rifampin treatment (33, 47, 48, 50) or when the expression of the D13L and A17L proteins are repressed during infection with lethal conditional VV viruses (45, 55, 56, 68, 74, 76).Although available evidence strongly supports the reticular origin of the ASFV inner envelope (7, 60), the mechanism of acquisition remains unknown, and the number of membranes present in the inner envelope is controversial. The traditional view of the inner envelope as formed by two tightly opposed membranes derived from ER collapsed cisternae (7, 59, 60) has recently been challenged by the careful examination of the width of the internal membrane of viral particles and the single outer mitochondrial membrane, carried out using chemical fixation, cryosectioning, and high-pressure freezing (34). The results suggest that the inner envelope of ASFV is a single lipid bilayer, which raises the question of how such a structure can be generated and stabilized in the precursors of the ASFV internal envelope. In the case of VV, the coat of the D13L protein has been suggested to play a key role in the stabilization of the single membrane structure of the crescent (10, 17, 36), but the ASFV capsid protein p72 is not a component of the viral membrane precursors. The identification and functional characterization of the proteins involved in the generation of these structures are essential for the understanding of the mechanisms involved in these early stages of viral assembly. For this reason, we are focusing our interest on the study of abundant structural membrane proteins that reside at the inner envelope of the viral particle. We have shown previously that one of these proteins, p54, is essential for the recruitment of ER membranes to the viral factory (59). Repression of protein p54 expression has a profound impact on virus production and leads to an early arrest in virion morphogenesis, resulting in the virtual absence of membranes in the viral factory.Protein p17, encoded by the late gene D117L in the BA71V strain, is an abundant structural protein (60, 65). Its sequence, which is highly conserved among ASFV isolates (16), does not show any significant similarity with the sequences present in the databases. Protein p17 is an integral membrane protein (18) that is predicted to insert in membranes with a Singer type I topology and has been localized in the envelope precursors as well as in both intracellular and extracellular mature particles (60), suggesting that it resides at the internal envelope, the only membranous structure of the intracellular particles.In this work, we analyze the role of protein p17 in viral assembly by means of an IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside)-dependent lethal conditional virus. The data presented indicate that protein p17 is essential for viral morphogenesis. The repression of this protein appears to block assembly at the level of viral precursor membranes, resulting in their accumulation at the viral factory.From the electron microscopy analysis of serial sections of viral factories at very early times during morphogenesis, we present experimental evidence that suggests that, during assembly, viral precursor membranes and core material organize into large helicoidal intermediates from which icosahedral particles emerge. The possible role of these structures during ASFV morphogenesis is discussed.     

Membrane Insertion and Biogenesis of the Turnip Crinkle Virus p9 Movement Protein

Plant viral infection and spread depends on the successful introduction of a virus into a cell of a compatible host, followed by replication and cell-to-cell transport. The movement proteins (MPs) p8 and p9 of Turnip crinkle virus are required for cell-to-cell movement of the virus. We have examined the membrane association of p9 and found that it is an integral membrane protein with a defined topology in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Furthermore, we have used a site-specific photo-cross-linking strategy to study the membrane integration of the protein at the initial stages of its biosynthetic process. This process is cotranslational and proceeds through the signal recognition particle and the translocon complex.Cell-to-cell transport of plant virus requires the virally encoded movement proteins (MPs). These proteins specialize in the translocation of the viral genome or, in some cases, the virions from the replication/encapsidation site to adjacent cells. This process takes place through the plasmodesmata (PD), the small pores formed by prolongations of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes trapped within the center of the plasma membrane-lined cytoplasmic cylinder that connect plant cells. MPs belong to different protein families with unique functional and structural characteristics. The most studied MP is p30 from the Tobacco mosaic virus, a 30-kDa RNA-binding protein (4) with two putative transmembrane (TM) segments (2) that has so far been considered an integral membrane protein (13, 42). At an early stage of infection, p30 associates with the ER network (18, 59). Given that the ER is continuous through PD, it was suggested that the movement complex transports cell to cell via the PD. On the other hand, passage through the connecting structure largely remains a mystery, although it seems reasonable that the process again occurs in close juxtaposition to the ER-derived membrane (desmotubule) that runs through the PD (12, 35). Many other plant viruses have a cell-to-cell transport system based not on one but on two (double-gene block [DGB]) or even three (triple-gene block [TGB]) MPs. In some of these cases it has been shown that at least one MP is closely associated with the ER membrane (28, 34, 41, 50, 55). Thus, it has been assumed that other MPs associate similarly with membranes.The targeting and insertion of an integral membrane protein can occur either posttranslationally, in which the protein is completely synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes before being inserted, or cotranslationally, in which protein synthesis and integration into the ER membrane are coupled. In the latter case, the targeting of the ribosome-mRNA-nascent chain complex to the membrane depends on the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its interaction with the membrane-bound SRP receptor (11), which is located in close proximity to the translocon. The translocon, a multiprotein complex composed of the Sec61α, -β, and -γ subunits (16) and the translocating chain-associated membrane protein (TRAM) (15) in eukaryotic cells, facilitates the translocation of soluble proteins into the ER lumen and the insertion of integral membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer (24).Plant virus infection depends on the proper targeting and association or insertion of the movement proteins with or into the ER membrane. In this report, we investigate the insertion into, topology of, and targeting to the membrane of the p9 MP from Turnip crinkle virus (TCV). This is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the Carmovirus genus and thus to the DGB. Its 4-kb genome encodes five open reading frames (ORFs) (3, 17). Translation of the first two yields p28 and p88, both implicated in viral RNA synthesis. In the central region, two overlapping ORFs encode the small proteins p8 and p9, which have been shown to be involved in cell-to-cell movement (6, 17, 31). The RNA-binding protein p8 (17, 58) overlaps the distal 3′ region of the replicase p88. The 3′ region of the genome encodes the viral coat protein p38, and its 5′ end overlaps p9 (3).A strong interaction with the membrane is expected for p9 due to the close similarities in the genomic arrangement of TCV (57) with other carmoviruses, like Carnation mottle virus (CarMV) and Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV). Both CarMV and MNSV have two small MPs, one an RNA-binding protein (39, 53, 54) and the other a cotranslationally inserted integral membrane protein (34, 47, 55). In this study, we present evidence of the integration of TCV p9 into ER-derived microsomal membranes. Using an in vitro translation system based on a model integral membrane protein, we have been able to identify two membrane-spanning domains. Additionally, the membrane topology of the p9 MP was analyzed in vitro and found to have an N terminus (N-t)/C terminus (C-t) luminal orientation. Finally, using a site-directed photo-cross-linking approach, we demonstrated that the mechanism of p9 insertion into the ER membrane involves SRP and the translocon.     

Poly(A)-Binding Protein 1 Partially Relocalizes to the Nucleus during Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection in an ICP27-Independent Manner and Does Not Inhibit Virus Replication

Infection of cells by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) triggers host cell shutoff whereby mRNAs are degraded and cellular protein synthesis is diminished. However, virus protein translation continues because the translational apparatus in HSV-infected cells is maintained in an active state. Surprisingly, poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABP1), a predominantly cytoplasmic protein that is required for efficient translation initiation, is partially relocated to the nucleus during HSV-1 infection. This relocalization occurred in a time-dependent manner with respect to virus infection. Since HSV-1 infection causes cell stress, we examined other cell stress inducers and found that oxidative stress similarly relocated PABP1. An examination of stress-induced kinases revealed similarities in HSV-1 infection and oxidative stress activation of JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Importantly, PABP relocalization in infection was found to be independent of the viral protein ICP27. The depletion of PABP1 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown had no significant effect on viral replication or the expression of selected virus late proteins, suggesting that reduced levels of cytoplasmic PABP1 are tolerated during infection.The lytic replication cycle of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) can be divided into three phases, immediate-early (IE), early (E), and late (L), that occur in a coordinated sequential gene expression program. IE proteins can regulate E and L gene expression, which produces proteins involved in DNA replication, capsid production, and virion assembly. HSV infection results in host cell shutoff to facilitate the efficient production of viral proteins. First, mRNA is degraded by the virion-associated vhs protein, and then ICP27, a multifunctional regulator of gene expression, inhibits pre-mRNA splicing. As most viral mRNAs are intronless, this abrogates the production of stable cellular mRNAs that can be exported to the cytoplasm and compete for translation with viral mRNAs (44).HSV mRNAs are capped and polyadenylated and so are translated via a normal cap-dependent mechanism. Translation initiation, during which translationally active ribosomes are assembled, is a tightly regulated process (21). Eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) (composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A) that binds the cap at the 5′ end of the mRNA promotes the recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit and associated factors, including eIF2-GTP initiator tRNA. The recognition of the start codon then promotes large ribosomal subunit joining. Poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABP1), which binds and multimerizes on mRNA poly(A) tails, enhances translation initiation through interactions with the eIF4G component of the eIF4F cap-binding complex (20, 29, 32, 51) to circularize the mRNA in a “closed-loop” conformation (24). Key protein-RNA and protein-protein interactions in the translation initiation complex are strengthened by this PABP1-mediated circularization (12).HSV-1 maintains active viral translation in the face of host translational shutoff. Infection activates protein kinase R (PKR), which phosphorylates eIF2α, resulting in translation inhibition. However, HSV-1 ICP34.5 redirects protein phosphatase 1α to reverse eIF2α phosphorylation, abrogating the block to translation (17, 38). In addition, the HSV-1 US11 protein inhibits PKR and may also block PKR-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation (40, 42). HSV-1 infection also enhances eIF4F assembly in quiescent cells by the phosphorylation and proteasome-mediated degradation of the eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP), which, when hypophosphorylated, can negatively regulate eIF4F complex formation (54). However, ICP6 may also contribute to eIF4F assembly by binding to eIF4G (55). Finally, ICP6 is required for Mnk-1 phosphorylation of eIF4E, but the mechanisms behind this remain unclear (54). ICP27 has also been implicated in translation regulation during HSV infection (6, 8, 10, 30) and may also activate p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase that can phosphorylate eIF4E (16, 59).PABP1 appears to be a common cellular target of RNA and DNA viruses. PABP1 can undergo proteolysis, intracellular relocalization, or modification of its interaction with other translation factors in response to infection. For example, poliovirus induces host cell shutoff by cleaving PABP1, thus disrupting certain PABP1-containing complexes (28, 29). The rotavirus NSP3 protein can displace PABP1 from translation initiation complexes (41). However, NSP3 also interacts with a cellular protein, RoXaN, which is required to relocate PABP1 to the nucleus (13). Similarly, the Kaposi''s sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) SOX protein plays a role in relocating PABP1, its cofactor in cellular mRNA decay, to the nucleus (33). Although steady-state levels of PABP1 are highest in the cytoplasm of normal cells, where it has cytoplasmic functions, it is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein (1). However, it is unclear how PABP1 enters or exits the nucleus, as it contains neither a canonical nuclear export nor an import signal.Here we describe the loss of PABP1 from cap-binding complexes and the partial relocation of PABP1 to the nucleus in HSV-1-infected cells in a time-dependent manner. Relocation is specific for PABP1, as other translation factors remained in the cytoplasm. Cells undergo stress during HSV-1 infection, and analysis of a variety of cell stresses revealed that PABP relocalization was also observed upon oxidative stress. Paxillin, a potential PABP1 nuclear chaperone, was phosphorylated, and the paxillin-PABP1 interaction was reduced during virus infection. However, the interaction was weak and cell type dependent, indicating that other effectors of PABP1 relocation in the infected cell must exist. Recently, the HSV-1 ICP27 protein was suggested to alter the PABP1 cellular location (6). However, infections with ICP27-null mutant viruses clearly demonstrated that ICP27 is not required for PABP1 nuclear relocation in the context of infection. Although HSV-1 mRNAs are translated by a normal cap-dependent mechanism known to be enhanced by PABP1, small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of PABP1 indicated that at late times of infection, the translation of certain virus late proteins tolerates very low levels of PABP1.     

The Adenovirus E4orf4 Protein Induces G2/M Arrest and Cell Death by Blocking Protein Phosphatase 2A Activity Regulated by the B55 Subunit

Human adenovirus E4orf4 protein is toxic in human tumor cells. Its interaction with the Bα subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is critical for cell killing; however, the effect of E4orf4 binding is not known. Bα is one of several mammalian B-type regulatory subunits that form PP2A holoenzymes with A and C subunits. Here we show that E4orf4 protein interacts uniquely with B55 family subunits and that cell killing increases with the level of E4orf4 expression. Evidence suggesting that Bα-specific PP2A activity, measured in vitro against phosphoprotein substrates, is reduced by E4orf4 binding was obtained, and two potential B55-specific PP2A substrates, 4E-BP1 and p70^S6K, were seen to be hypophosphorylated in vivo following expression of E4orf4. Furthermore, treatment of cells with low levels of the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid or coexpression of the PP2A inhibitor I₁^PP2A enhanced E4orf4-induced cell killing and G₂/M arrest significantly. These results suggested that E4orf4 toxicity results from the inhibition of B55-specific PP2A holoenzymes, an idea that was strengthened by an observed growth arrest resulting from treatment of H1299 cells with Bα-specific RNA interference. We believe that E4orf4 induces growth arrest resulting in cell death by reducing the global level of B55-specific PP2A activity, thus preventing the dephosphorylation of B55-specific PP2A substrates, including those involved in cell cycle progression.Our research group and others have shown that the 114-residue product of early region E4 of human adenoviruses, termed E4orf4, induces p53-independent cell death in human tumor cells (24, 25, 34-36, 55) and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (23, 53). E4orf4 protein, which shares no obvious homology with other viral or cellular products, kills a wide range of human cancer cells but is believed to have reduced activity against normal human primary cells (6, 55, 56). Although in some cases E4orf4-expressing cells exhibit characteristics typical of apoptosis, including the presence of irregularly shaped and shrunken nuclei, cytoplasmic vacuolization, and membrane blebbing (24, 25, 50, 55), cell death may more typically be independent of caspase activation (24, 25, 30, 32, 50). With H1299 human non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells, death is characterized by rapid cell rounding, enlargement, release from the surface of culture plates, cell cycle arrest in G₂/M and possibly G₁, and eventually, after an extended period, loss of membrane integrity (30). Both cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways have been observed, the former involving interactions with c-Src family kinases, activation of calpain, and remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton (7, 24, 50, 51, 58). Little is known about the nuclear pathway, which may represent the predominant death-inducing process. Our current evidence suggests that H1299 cells die following prolonged irreversible cell cycle arrest leading to mitotic catastrophe and death by a necrosis-like process (30).E4orf4 is known to associate with the Bα regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (22, 34), and this interaction appears to be necessary for the majority of E4orf4 toxicity in both yeast (23, 53) and human tumor cells (34, 56). PP2A is an abundant serine-threonine phosphatase involved in regulation of metabolism, splicing, translation, morphogenesis, development, and cell cycle progression (15, 19, 27, 43, 59). PP2A holoenzymes exist as multiple heterotrimeric complexes composed of a catalytic C subunit, an A subunit that functions as a scaffold, and a B-type regulatory subunit. Two forms each of the A and C subunits exist in mammalian cells; however, more than 20 B-type subunits have been identified in three unique classes (B/B55, B′/B56, B″/PR72), plus striatin/SG2NA (sometimes called B‴) (10, 19, 26). Although one group has suggested that E4orf4 protein interacts with one or more members of the B′/B56 class (57), it is generally accepted that interaction with the Bα/B55 subunit (Cdc55 in yeast) is important for induction of cell death in both human tumor cells and yeast (53, 57). Interestingly, a recent report has also suggested that in yeast, growth suppression induced by E4orf4 is mediated only in part by the catalytic C subunit of PP2A (31).In the present report, we show that E4orf4 protein interacts uniquely with members of the B55 class of PP2A B-type subunits, and at sufficient concentrations, it appears to become toxic by reducing dephosphorylation of substrates of B55-containing PP2A holoenzymes. As cell death is preceded by cell cycle arrest, we believe that key substrates may include proteins required for cell cycle progression.