Maxillary reconstruction: functional and aesthetic considerations

Maxillary reconstruction is a challenging endeavor in functional and aesthetic restoration. Given its central location in the midface and its contributions to the key midfacial elements--the orbits, the zygomaticomaxillary complex, the nasal unit, and the stomatognathic complex--the maxilla functions as the keystone of the midface and unifies these elements into a functional and aesthetic unit. Maxillary defects are inherently complex because they generally involve more than one midfacial component. In addition, most maxillary defects are composite in nature, and they often require skin coverage, bony support, and mucosal lining for reconstruction. In the reconstruction of maxillary defects secondary to trauma, ablative tumor surgery, or congenital deformities, the following goals must be met: (1) obliteration of the defect; (2) restoration of essential functions of the midface, such as mastication and speech; (3) provision for adequate structural support to each of the midfacial units; and (4) aesthetic reconstruction of the external features. This review will discuss the pertinent anatomic considerations, the historical approaches to maxillary reconstruction, and the merits of the techniques in use today, with an emphasis on state-of-the-art reconstruction and dental rehabilitation of extensive maxillary defects.     

Nasal reconstruction: seeking a fourth dimension

A method of nasal reconstruction emphasizing the use of thin but highly vascular local lining and cover flaps to allow successful primary placement of delicate cartilage grafts is presented. The cartilage fabrication provides projection in space, airway patency, and, when visible through conforming skin cover, the delicate contour of the normal nose. Because tissue is replaced in kind and quantity, the need for multiple revisions to sculpt and debulk is decreased. Techniques and four case reports describe its applications to tip, heminose, subtotal, and total nasal defects.     

A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap

Because of its ideal color and texture, forehead skin is acknowledged as the best donor site with which to resurface the nose. However, all forehead flaps, regardless of their vascular pedicles, are thicker than normal nasal skin. Stiff and flat, they do not easily mold from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional shape. Traditionally, the forehead is transferred in two stages. At the first stage, frontalis muscle and subcutaneous tissue are excised distally and the partially thinned flap is inset into the recipient site. At a second stage, 3 weeks later, the pedicle is divided. However, such soft-tissue "thinning" is limited, incomplete, and piecemeal. Flap necrosis and contour irregularities are especially common in smokers and in major nasal reconstructions. To overcome these problems, the technique of forehead flap transfer was modified. An extra operation was added between transfer and division.At the first stage, a full-thickness forehead flap is elevated with all its layers and is transposed without thinning except for the columellar inset. Primary cartilage grafts are placed if vascularized intranasal lining is present or restored. Importantly, at the first stage, skin grafts or a folded forehead flap can be used effectively for lining. A full-thickness skin graft will reliably survive when placed on a highly vascular bed. A full-thickness forehead flap can be folded to replace missing cover skin, with a distal extension, in continuity, to supply lining. At the second stage, 3 weeks later during an intermediate operation, the full-thickness forehead flap, now healed to its recipient bed, is physiologically delayed. Forehead skin with 3 to 4 mm of subcutaneous fat (nasal skin thickness) is elevated in the unscarred subcutaneous plane over the entire nasal inset, except for the columella. Skin grafts or folded flaps integrate into adjacent normal lining and can be completely separated from the overlying cover from which they were initially vascularized. If used, a folded forehead flap is incised free along the rim, completely separating the proximal cover flap from the distal lining extension. The underlying subcutaneous tissue, frontalis muscle, and any previously positioned cartilage grafts are now widely exposed, and excess soft tissue can be excised to carve an ideal subunit, rigid subsurface architecture. Previous primary cartilage grafts can be repositioned, sculpted, or augmented, if required. Delayed primary cartilage grafts can be placed to support lining created from a skin graft or a folded flap. The forehead cover skin (thin, supple, and conforming) is then replaced on the underlying rigid, recontoured, three-dimensional recipient bed. The pedicle is not transected. At a third stage, 3 weeks later (6 weeks after the initial transfer), the pedicle is divided.Over 10 years in 90 nasal reconstructions for partial and full-thickness defects, the three-stage forehead flap technique with an intermediate operation was used with primary and delayed primary grafts, and with intranasal lining flaps (n = 15), skin grafts (n = 11), folded forehead flaps (n = 3), turnover flaps (n = 5), prefabricated flaps (n = 4), and free flaps for lining (n = 2). Necrosis of the forehead flap did not occur. Late revisions were not required or were minor in partial defects. In full-thickness defects, a major revision and more than two minor revisions were performed in less than 5 percent of patients. Overall, the aesthetic results approached normal.The planned three-stage forehead flap technique of nasal repair with an intermediate operation (1) transfers subtle, conforming forehead skin of ideal thinness for cover, with little risk of necrosis; (2) uses primary and delayed primary grafts and permits modification of initial cartilage grafts to correct failures of design, malposition, or scar contraction before flap division; (3) creates an ideal, rigid subsurface framework of hard and soft tissue that is reflected through overlying skin and blends well into adjacent recipient tissues; (4) expands the application of lining techniques to include the use of skin grafts for lining at the first stage, or as a "salvage procedure" during the second stage, and also permits the aesthetic use of folded forehead flaps for lining; (5) ensures maximal blood supply and vascular safety to all nasal layers; (6) provides the surgeon with options to salvage reconstructive catastrophes; (7) improves the aesthetic result while decreasing the number and difficulty of revision operations and overall time for repair; and (8) emphasizes the interdependence of anatomy (cover, lining, and support) and provides insight into the nature of wound injury and repair in nasal reconstruction.     

Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap in children younger than 10 years of age

Nasal reconstruction has been analyzed extensively in adults but not in children. The purpose of this article is to review the authors' experience with the forehead flap for nasal reconstruction in 10 children under the age of 10 during a 10-year period. Outcomes were assessed by an objective grading system for cosmetic surgical results. Subjective criteria were also applied by an assistant surgeon and by the patients' relatives. Appropriate results were obtained by the following principles: (1) A modified approach that considers three subunits consisting of the dorsum, tip, and ala was used; (2) a forehead flap is the best option for an entire subunit or a full-thickness defect repair; (3) the forehead flap design should be paramedian, oblique, and opposite to the major defect to avoid the hairline and allow better caudal advancement; (4) ear or costal cartilages are good options for structural support (the septum is a nasal growth center that should not be touched); (5) infundibular undermining of vestibular mucosa, turnover flaps, and skin grafts are good options for internal lining; (6) reconstruction is a three-stage procedure (an intermediate operation is added to thin the flap and perform secondary revisions for lining and support); (7) reconstruction should be completed before the child is school aged, to achieve good aesthetic results immediately and avoid psychosocial repercussions; and (8) the reconstructed nose, with skin, lining, and support, will grow with the child (no final surgery should be planned at the age of 18, other than revisions of late complications).     

Primary correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose: a 15-year experience

This paper reviews a 15-year personal experience based on 400 unilateral cleft nasal deformities that were reconstructed using a method that repositions the alar cartilage by freeing it from the skin and lining and shifts it to a new position. The rotation-advancement lip procedure facilitates the exposure and approach to the nasal reconstruction. The nasal soft tissues are transected from the skeletal base, reshaped, repositioned, and secured by using temporary stent sutures that readapt the alar cartilage, skin, and lining. The nasal floor is closed and the ala base is positioned to match the normal side. Good subsequent growth with maintenance of the reconstruction has been noted in this series. The repair does not directly expose or suture the alar cartilage. Improvement in the cleft nasal deformity is noted in 80 percent of the cases. Twenty percent require additional techniques to achieve the desired symmetry. This method has been used by the author as his primary unilateral cleft nasal repair and has been taught to residents and fellows under his direction with good results. This technique eliminates the severe cleft nasal deformity seen in many secondary cases.     

An evaluation of hard palate mucosa graft as a lining material in alar reconstruction: a 7-year experience applied to the full-thickness alar defect

The authors present their experience with 25 hard palate mucosa grafts used as lining material in the reconstruction of full-thickness alar defects. Good "take" was obtained in 22 grafts; the other three grafts incurred necrosis of the overriding skin flaps and postoperative infection. Degree of shrinkage was 11 to 15 percent of grafted size in patients with the type of defect that did not include the alar margin; shrinkage was 26 to 35 percent in patients with the type that included more than 50 percent of the alar margin. In all patients who had a good graft take, the nasal cavities were maintained and there was no nasal obstruction or collapsing during strong breathing. The healing time of the palate donor site varied from 7 days to 5 weeks, depending on the size of the defect. No patients experienced any symptoms at the donor site after healing. The authors concluded that hard palate mucosa can be considered a useful material in alar reconstruction because of the ease in graft harvesting and its support features. When the defect is large enough to involve the total unilateral ala nasi, even though the degree of postoperative shrinkage is comparatively high, hard palate mucosa may be the most suitable material to ensure good take of the graft and less possibility of donor-site morbidity.     

The superiorly based nasolabial flap for simultaneous alar and cheek reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the epidemiology of skin cancer in a patient with preexisting skin cancer. 2. Understand the indications for the use of a nasolabial flap and nonanatomic alar strut graft. 3. Describe the blood supply to the nasolabial flap.The goals of reconstructing deformities of the face acquired secondary to skin tumors include optimizing donor-site aesthetics and reconstructing the area with similar types of tissue when possible. Multiple skin-cancer defects are often seen by the plastic surgeon and complicate the reconstruction, requiring more than one flap or skin graft. A case analysis of an innovative application of the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of a simultaneous medial cheek and alar-base nasal defect is presented. Concepts in nasal reconstruction are reviewed, and the authors' approach to alar reconstruction is presented.     

Vascularized rib for facial reconstruction

The reconstruction of maxillectomy defects is a complex problem encountered in plastic surgery. Defects can range in size and complexity from small defects requiring only soft tissue to complete maxillectomies requiring large tissue bulk, bone, and one or more skin paddles. The most difficult defects involve the skull base and orbit. The reconstructive surgeon is faced with the challenge of isolating the nasopharynx from the dura and globe while simultaneously restoring the bony framework of the maxilla and orbit to support the soft tissue of the cheek. The authors present a series of six reconstructions using a rectus abdominis muscle flap with associated vascularized rib for reconstruction of complex maxillectomy defects. This flap provides large soft-tissue bulk as well as bony support and a long vascular pedicle. A skin island can be taken with the flap, and the donor-site morbidity is comparable to that seen with a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Six flaps were used in five patients over a 20-month period. All patients had stable support of the orbit at follow-up with adequate soft-tissue coverage, and there were no incidences of visual changes.     

Prelaminated free flap reconstruction of complex central facial defects

This article is a review of five patients who underwent reconstruction of nasal and paranasal facial defects with prelaminated forearm free flaps. The defects resulted from thermal injury, gunshot wound, excision of tumor, and arteriovenous malformation (n = 2). The forearm flaps were based on the radial artery (n = 4) and ulnar artery (n = 1) and were prelaminated with grafts of skin and cartilage. All flaps were successfully transferred to the face, but revisions were needed to separate the subunits and improve appearance. A prelaminated free flap should be considered for a patient requiring reconstruction of a complex central facial defect.     

Reconstruction of proximal nasal defects with island composite nasal flaps

There are few local nasal flap options for repair of proximal nasal defects. Absence of suitable donor sites and the large dimensions of the defects limit the use of local nasal flaps in this region. Regional paranasal flaps may not be suitable in these cases because of color, texture, and donor-site scars. The composite procerus muscle and nasal skin flap, which is vascularized by the dorsal nasal branch of the angular artery, can be a useful treatment modality for proximal nasal reconstruction. Seven patients were successfully treated using the composite nasal flaps. The maximal size of the defects was 2.4 cm. In one case, the composite nasal flap was readvanced to close a new defect resulting from reexcision. The composite nasal flap has several advantages in reconstruction of proximal nasal defects. Reconstruction is performed with the same tissue and the donor defect is closed primarily. The composite nasal flap can be moved in multiple directions and has great mobility to reach every point of the proximal part of the nose with axial blood supply. Furthermore, it can be easily readvanced without additional morbidity in case of reexcision.     

Reconstruction using a three-dimensional orbitozygomatic skeletal model of titanium mesh plate and soft-tissue free flap transfer following total maxillectomy

The surgical strategy for maxillary reconstruction after maxillectomy has yet to be standardized. The authors developed a technique using a three-dimensional orbitozygomatic skeletal model of a titanium mesh for skeletal reconstruction after maxillectomy. From May of 1996 to September of 2000, 18 patients underwent reconstruction using the titanium mesh model in conjunction with a soft-tissue free flap following total maxillectomy for a maxillary malignancy. The soft-tissue free flap was conventional and consisted of two skin paddles to the maxillary defect. One skin paddle became the lateral nasal wall and the other was used to close the palatal defect. After modeling, the titanium mesh plate was implanted between the orbital contents and the upper edge of the free flap to lie over the front of the flap. The model was fixed to the residual zygoma laterally and to the nasal or frontal bone medially. The palatal skin paddle was anchored by three or four dermal stitches to the bottom edge of the titanium mesh to create a concave neopalate that allowed the patient to wear a denture. Thirteen of 18 patients who underwent implantation had good facial appearance and oral function. This procedure prevented lagophthalmos, facial deformity, and sagging of the palatal skin paddle caused by gravitational force. Five patients (27.8 percent) developed exposure or infection of the implant and lost the benefit of having the prosthesis. However, treatment did not require total removal of the implant. Maintaining adequate tissue volume during soft-tissue transfer on either side of the mesh plate may minimize the complication rate. Titanium mesh implantation for skeletal reconstruction after maxillectomy avoids the need for bone grafting and may be especially beneficial in fragile or aged patients.     

Use of the radial forearm flap for deep,central, midfacial defects

Six cases that required soft-tissue replacement in the central midface are presented. The greatest number of flaps were used for large defects in patients with cleft palates who had undergone multiple previous operations. Several were for palatal defects attributable to cocaine abuse, and one was used for lining in a nasal reconstruction. There were no flap losses and, on the basis of these experiences, it is concluded that this is an excellent method for providing soft tissue in these difficult situations.     

Functional reconstruction of maxilla with free latissimus dorsi-scapular osteomusculocutaneous flap

Restoration of oral and nasal function together with facial appearance is still challenging in maxillary reconstruction. Use of a composite flap transfer merely to fill the defect results in unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. The authors present a reconstructive procedure for complex maxillary defects using the latissimus dorsi-scapular rib osteomusculocutaneous flap. Some modifications for the reconstruction of the nasal cavity and the hard palate contributed to excellent postoperative functions. Five cases of extended maxillary defect were reconstructed using a novel procedure between February of 1997 and October of 2000. The hard palate was reconstructed with a vascularized scapular angle. The infraorbital rim was reconstructed with a vascularized rib if it was required. A prop bone graft, replacing the zygomatic buttress, was added between the infraorbital rim and the hard palate. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap, which was supported by a skeletal framework and obliterated the remaining cavities around the bone grafts, was left exposed into the nasal cavity, and an 8-French (no. 10) nasal airway tube was placed as a stent in the nasal meatus for 3 weeks after surgery. A skin graft was applied on the scapular angle to reconstruct the oral side of the hard palate. If required, facial skin defect was repaired with a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap or scapular flap. No major complications at the recipient or the donor sites occurred postoperatively in any of the five cases. In cases in which the eyeballs were preserved, almost normal facial appearance was obtained and an orbital extirpation case showed an acceptable postoperative appearance. All five patients returned to an unrestricted diet and their speech was assessed as normal by a speech test. Nasal breathing through the re-epithelialized meatus was possible in all cases. The reconstructed nasal cavity was maintained for more than 6 months in all cases and for more than 2 years in one early case. Rhinometry demonstrated normal function, and histologic findings of the re-epithelialized mucosa over the muscle flap in the nasal cavity revealed a nearly normal architecture. This technique simplifies the reconstructive procedure of massive maxillary defects, including those in the lateral wall of the nasal cavity. It also improves the postoperative oral and nasal functions of the patients.     

Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply

Assured of a robust blood supply by its narrow pedicle centered on the septal branch of the superior labial artery, the pivoting septal flap provides nasal support from the radix to the most distal nasal tip and from the tip to the columella base--plus a large bonus of lining tissues for the nasal vault and vestibules. Lining flaps from such intranasal tissues are thin, vascular, and flexible. They allow the use of primary cartilage grafts and the establishment of a subsurface architecture in the shape of a nose. When visualized through a conforming forehead flap, the normal landmarks and highlights are restored. In cases of total nasal amputation, a pivoting septal flap permits the fabrication of dorsal nasal support weeks before lining and cover flaps are assembled.     

The versatile temporoparietal fascial flap: adaptability to a variety of composite defects

The unique properties of the temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) offer adaptability in reconstruction of a variety of composite defects. The broad, thin sheet of vascularized tissue may be transferred alone or as a carrier of subjacent bone or overlying skin and scalp. As a pedicled flap, it is ideal for defects of the orbital, malar, mandibular, and mastoid regions. As a free-tissue transfer, the large vessels and lack of bulk find broad utility in reconstruction of the extremities. This flap is our choice for reconstruction of the dorsal hand and non-weight-bearing surfaces of the foot. A viscous gliding surface decreases friction for tendon excursion. The thin contour is aesthetically superior to thicker flaps, allowing unmodified footwear or gloves. The pliable fascia convolutes into surface defects (e.g., bone craters) or drapes over skeletal frameworks (e.g., ear cartilage). The rich capillary network offers nutrition to saucerized bone, cartilage or tendon grafts, and overlying skin grafts. The geometry of the skull lends to fabrication of membranous bone for complex facial puzzles. The donor site is well disguised by hair growth. Twelve cases performed over a 2-year period demonstrate the versatility of this flap. These include complex foot reconstruction, ear and scalp avulsion, shotgun wound of the cheek and orbit, posttraumatic jaw recontouring, chronic osteomyelitis of the hand and foot, and acute resurfacing of dorsal hand with tendon reconstruction.     

The dermis-prelaminated scapula flap for reconstructions of the hard palate and the alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic evaluation.

Ideal reconstructions of complex defects in the midface require the restitution not only of bone and soft tissue, but also of a thin and durable lining of the oral cavity. So far, split-thickness skin grafts, intestinal grafts, and in vitro cultured mucosal grafts have been used for the reconstruction of the oral lining. The use of skin as a substitute for oral mucosa is controversial because contraction, hair growth, maceration, and dysplastic changes can occur. This clinical and histologic study was performed to evaluate the suitability of dermis as a substitute for oral lining. Twelve complex defects of the midface were reconstructed with dermis-prelaminated scapula flaps. A bony flap from the lateral border of the scapula was prepared, and osseointegrated implants were placed. The bone flap was then prelaminated with dermis and covered with a Gore-Tex membrane to prevent adhesions. The composite flap was transferred to the midface 2 to 3 months later. The oral lining of the flap was evaluated clinically and histologically at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at 3 to 41 months after the reconstruction. In all patients, the reconstructed bone was covered with a thin and lubricated surface without hair growth. None of the patients showed any signs of maceration. Histologically, these findings corresponded to a keratinized stratified squamous epithelium with highly developed connective-tissue papillae. These features closely resemble those of the normal mucosa of the hard palate and the gingiva. Thus, dermis prelamination is an effective method for reconstructing the mucosa of the alveolar ridge and the hard palate.     

Reconstruction of composite through-and-through mandibular defects with a double-skin paddle fibular osteocutaneous flap

Microsurgical reconstruction of composite through-and-through defects of the oral cavity involving mucosa, bone, and external skin has often required two free flaps or double-skin paddle scapular or radial forearm flaps for successful functional and aesthetic outcomes. A safe, reliable technique using a double-skin paddle fibular osteocutaneous flap to restore the intraoral lining, mandibular bone, and external skin is described. A large elliptical or rectangular skin paddle is designed 90 degrees to the longitudinal axis of the fibula, over the junction of the middle and distal thirds of the lower leg, based only on the posterolateral septocutaneous perforators. This skin flap can be draped anteriorly and posteriorly over the fibular bone to reconstruct both the intraoral defect and the external skin defect. The area between the two skin islands of the intraoral flap and the external flap is deepithelialized and left as a dermal bridge between the two skin islands, as opposed to the creation of two separate vertical skin paddles, each based on a septocutaneous perforator. The transverse dimension of the flap can be as great as 14 cm, extending to within 1 to 2 cm of the tibial crest anteriorly and as far as the midline posteriorly, and with a length of up to 26 cm, this flap should be more than sufficient for reconstruction of most through-and-through defects. This technique has allowed the successful reconstruction of large composite defects, with missing intraoral lining, mandibular bone, and external skin, for 16 patients, with 100 percent survival of both skin islands in all cases and without the development of any orocutaneous fistulae.     

Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects.

Extensive composite defects of the oromandibular area are usually created after the surgical treatment of T3 and T4 cancers, requiring complex reconstructive plastic surgical procedures. The preferred treatment method for this type of defect is reconstruction with two free flaps. The use of the vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for the bone and inner lining defect is well known and accepted. Among the flaps that can be used for the outer lining and soft-tissue reconstruction, the two most commonly used have been the forearm flap and the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. However, these flaps have some disadvantages that restrict their use for this purpose. The forearm flap is usually too thin to cover the fibular bone and reconstruction plate, and the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap can cause a subclinical reduction in abdominal strength. Both radial forearm and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps are difficult to harvest during tumor excision. Because of these drawbacks, over the past several years the authors have preferred to use the anterolateral thigh flap for outer face, neck, and submandibular region reconstructions. From October of 1998 to June of 2000, 22 extensive composite mandibular defect reconstructions using the free anterolateral thigh flap, combined with the vascularized free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap, were performed at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Complete flap survival was 90.9 percent (40 of 44 flaps). Complete loss was seen in an anterolateral thigh flap, which was then reconstructed with a pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap (2.3 percent). There were five venous problems: three in osteoseptocutaneous free fibula flaps, the other two in anterolateral thigh flaps; all were revised immediately. However, the skin islands of two osteoseptocutaneous free fibula flaps and one anterolateral thigh flap developed partial necrosis (6.8 percent). The other complications were compartment syndrome in the leg in one patient, external carotid artery rupture in one patient, three donor-site infections in two patients, three neck wound infections, and one myocardial insufficiency; all were treated properly. Thirteen patients underwent revision procedures 6 months after the first operation. These procedures included debulking of the flap or revision of the mouth angle or both. Trismus or intraoral contraction was noted in none of these patients. In conclusion, the free anterolateral thigh flap combined with the vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap seems to be a good choice in the reconstruction of the extensive composite defects of the oromandibular region aesthetically and functionally.     

Free fibula osteoseptocutaneous-pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap combination in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects

Lateral composite mandibular defects resulting from excision of advanced oral carcinoma often require mandible, intra-oral lining, external face, and soft-tissue bulk reconstruction. Ignorance of importance soft-tissue deficit in those patients may cause significant morbidity and functional loss. Such defects, therefore, can be reconstructed best with a double free flap technique. However, this procedure may not be feasible for every patient or surgeon. An alternative procedure is a free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap combined with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. This combination was used in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects in 14 patients with T3/T4 oral squamous cell carcinoma. All patients were men, and the average age was 54.3 years. The septocutaneous paddle of the fibula flap was used for the mucosal lining of the defects while the bony part established the rigid mandibular continuity. The pectoralis major flap then covered the external skin defect in the face and cheek, and the dead spaces left by the extirpated masticator muscles, buccal fat, and parotid gland. One free fibula flap failed totally, and one pectoralis major flap developed marginal necrosis. At the time of final evaluation, nine patients (64.3 percent) were alive, surviving an average of 25.7 months. All patients eventually regained their oral continence and an acceptable cosmetic appearance. In conclusion, the fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap plus regional myocutaneous flap choice is a successful and technically less demanding alternative to the double free flap procedures in reconstruction of extensive lateral mandibular defects.     

Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits

In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered.