The effects of group size and reproductive status on vigilance in captive Callithrix jacchus

Previous work on mammals and birds has often demonstrated a negative relationship between group size and individual vigilance. However, this relationship has received only weak support in nonhuman primates. This result may be due to the failure to distinguish different forms of vigilance such as antipredatory vigilance and social monitoring. Here, we tested the effects of group size, reproductive status (breeding vs. nonbreeding), and sex on antipredatory vigilance and social monitoring in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioral observations using one-zero sampling were conducted on adult members of three captive groups of small, medium, and large size. Data were analyzed using a series of general linear models (GLMs) analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs). We found an overall negative group size effect on antipredatory vigilance and that breeders, especially breeding males, were significantly more vigilant than nonbreeders. Conversely, we found that social monitoring increased with group size. Unlike the results for antipredatory vigilance, neither breeders and nonbreeders nor males and females differed in their amounts of social monitoring. However, the effect of group size appeared to differ for nonbreeding males compared to all other adults. Our results generally support the idea that individuals in larger groups are safer with breeding males likely playing a prominent role in protection from predation. The increase in social monitoring may be related to increased reproductive competition with the presence of adult offspring, but future studies need to clarify the target of social monitoring in both breeders and nonbreeders. Overall, the study underlines the importance of distinguishing different forms of vigilance and other factors as they may confound the effects of group size on antipredatory vigilance.     

Reduction of maternal care: a new benefit of multiple mating?

Cost/benefit analyses have been used to understand the evolutionof mating by females with multiple males, as in extrapair copulations(EPCs), which are now known to occur commonly in socially monogamousand polygynous birds. Indirect (genetic) benefits have beeninvoked to explain such mating patterns in some cases, butdirect benefits have received less attention. We report a studyof direct benefits in the communally rearing Mexican jay (Aphelocoma ultramarina). The social mate of the mother (putative father)is the most reliable feeder of the young in his nest, regardlessof cuckoldry. Feedings provided by social fathers are not reducedin relation to their paternity loss. In contrast, mothers havingnestlings sired by a second male tend to have lower feedingrates than those without such young. Secondary fathers provideda significantly higher level of feeding to the brood of theirfemale than did (1) random nonbreeders of all ages and bothsexes, (2) random male nonbreeders of all ages, and (3) older(2+ years), male nonbreeders. Surprisingly, however, broodswith two fathers did not receive a higher level of total feeding,despite our observation that two-father broods had two more helpers, on average, compared to broods without extra fathers.Regardless of age or breeding status, males were more frequentfeeders than females. This study provides the first evidencethat one of the major costs of reproduction, maternal careof nestlings, is reduced for females that have young sired by secondary males.     

Are clownfish groups composed of close relatives? An analysis of microsatellite DNA variation in Amphiprion percula

A central question of evolutionary ecology is: why do animals live in groups? Answering this question requires that the costs and benefits of group living are measured from the perspective of each individual in the group. This, in turn, requires that the group's genetic structure is elucidated, because genetic relatedness can modulate the individuals’ costs and benefits. The clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula, lives in groups composed of a breeding pair and zero to four nonbreeders. Both breeders and nonbreeders stand to gain by associating with relatives: breeders might prefer to tolerate nonbreeders that are relatives because there is little chance that relatives will survive to breed elsewhere; nonbreeders might prefer to associate with breeders that are relatives because of the potential to accrue indirect genetic benefits by enhancing anemone and, consequently, breeder fitness. Given the potential benefits of associating with relatives, we use microsatellite loci to investigate whether or not individuals within groups of A. percula are related. We develop seven polymorphic microsatellite loci, with a number of alleles (range 2–24) and an observed level of heterozygosity (mean = 0.5936) sufficient to assess fine‐scale genetic structure. The mean coefficient of relatedness among group members is 0.00 ± 0.10 (n = 9 groups), and there are no surprising patterns in the distribution of pairwise relatedness. We conclude that A. percula live in groups of unrelated individuals. This study lays the foundation for further investigations of behavioural, population and community ecology of anemonefishes which are emerging as model systems for evolutionary ecology in the marine environment.     

Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish

How big an animal group will be depends on how the group's sizeis regulated and on the costs and benefits of living in thegroup. To determine which individuals regulate group size ofthe clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula, I investigated thestrategies involved in the formation, maintenance, and dissolutionof its groups. Groups composed of a single breeding pair andof zero to four nonbreeding subordinates occupied individualsea anemones (Heteractis magnifica), which provided the fishwith oviposition sites and protection from predators. Groupsize increased linearly with anemone size. I used the residualsof this relationship as a measure of the degree of saturationof each anemone. Residents evicted low-rank subordinates andprevented the recruitment of additional subordinates at anemoneswith a high degree of saturation, but not at anemones with alow degree of saturation. These strategies indicate that residentscontrol group membership of their subordinates, and suggestthat residents might incur costs from the presence of subordinatesin more saturated anemones. In general, whenever residents cancontrol group membership, the prevention of recruitment andthe eviction of subordinates will set an upper limit on groupsize.     

Communal roosting,thermoregulatory benefits and breeding group size predictability in cooperatively breeding sociable weavers

Extreme temperatures impose energy costs on endotherms through thermoregulation and different adaptations help individuals to cope with these conditions. In social species, communal roosting and huddling are thought to decrease the energetic requirement of thermoregulation under low temperatures. This is likely to represent an important mechanism by which individuals save energy during the coldest parts of the year and hence to represent a non‐breeding benefit of sociality. Here, we investigate the potential thermoregulatory benefits of group living in roosting groups of sociable weavers Philetairus socius, a colonial cooperatively breeding passerine that builds communally a massive nest structure with several independent chambers wherein individuals breed and roost throughout the year. To investigate the benefits of sociality during the non‐breeding season, we studied the thermal environment during roosting in relation to group size. In addition, to understand the link between non‐breeding and breeding sociality in this species we studied group size stability between the pre‐breeding and breeding periods. As expected, we found that the nest chamber's night‐time temperature is strongly related to the number of birds roosting together, especially during cold nights. Specifically, birds in larger groups spent less time below the critical thermal minimum temperature (i.e. the temperature below which energy expenditure increases substantially). They were less exposed to external temperature variations. We also found a positive relationship between the number of birds roosting during winter and the breeding group size, indicating breeding group size predictability. In cooperative breeders such as the sociable weaver, the costs and benefits of sociality are usually studied during the breeding period. This study shows that a better understanding of non‐breeding benefits of group membership and group dynamics between the non‐breeding and breeding periods are necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the benefits of sociality.     

Rank and colony defense against conspecifics in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp

An important benefit of social living is increased capacityfor defense. Highly eusocial species have often evolved a fightingcaste for this purpose, but many facultatively eusocial insectsand cooperatively breeding vertebrates lack morphological castesand the decision to defend or not can depend on costs and benefitsto each individual. Defense by subordinates in a social groupcan be regarded as a form of helping, and helping input oftenvaries among subordinates of different age or size. Severalhypotheses attempt to explain variation in helping effort, includingthe effects of relatedness and differences in the costs of helping.Evidence for these hypotheses is mixed and often lacks dataon the rank of subordinates, an important determinant of expectedfuture fitness. We examined individual variation in propensityto defend the nest against conspecifics in the tropical hairy-facedhover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Prior to experimentation,we determined the positions of all wasps in the age-based queueto inherit the single egg-laying position in each L. flavolineatagroup. Two approaches were then used: observations of defenseagainst natural intrusions by conspecifics and experimentaltrials where wasps were presented attached to a wire. Higherranks were more likely to defend the nest than lower ranks,opposite to the pattern previously documented for another formof helping: foraging effort. Possible explanations for thisresult are that higher ranked females are better defenders andthat they suffer a larger decrease in expected future fitnesswhen an intruder usurps their position in the inheritance queue.     

The ecology of cooperative breeding behaviour

Ecology is a fundamental driving force for the evolutionary transition from solitary living to breeding cooperatively in groups. However, the fact that both benign and harsh, as well as stable and fluctuating, environments can favour the evolution of cooperative breeding behaviour constitutes a paradox of environmental quality and sociality. Here, we propose a new model – the dual benefits framework – for resolving this paradox. Our framework distinguishes between two categories of grouping benefits – resource defence benefits that derive from group‐defended critical resources and collective action benefits that result from social cooperation among group members – and uses insider–outsider conflict theory to simultaneously consider the interests of current group members (insiders) and potential joiners (outsiders) in determining optimal group size. We argue that the different grouping benefits realised from resource defence and collective action profoundly affect insider–outsider conflict resolution, resulting in predictable differences in the per capita productivity, stable group size, kin structure and stability of the social group. We also suggest that different types of environmental variation (spatial vs. temporal) select for societies that form because of the different grouping benefits, thus helping to resolve the paradox of why cooperative breeding evolves in such different types of environments.     

First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids

Cooperative breeders serve as a model to study the evolution of cooperation, where costs and benefits of helping are typically scrutinized at the level of group membership. However, cooperation is often observed in multi-level social organizations involving interactions among individuals at various levels. Here, we argue that a full understanding of the adaptive value of cooperation and the evolution of complex social organization requires identifying the effect of different levels of social organization on direct and indirect fitness components. Our long-term field data show that in the cooperatively breeding, colonial cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher, both large group size and high colony density significantly raised group persistence. Neither group size nor density affected survival at the individual level, but they had interactive effects on reproductive output; large group size raised productivity when local population density was low, whereas in contrast, small groups were more productive at high densities. Fitness estimates of individually marked fish revealed indirect fitness benefits associated with staying in large groups. Inclusive fitness, however, was not significantly affected by group size, because the direct fitness component was not increased in larger groups. Together, our findings highlight that the reproductive output of groups may be affected in opposite directions by different levels of sociality, and that complex forms of sociality and costly cooperation may evolve in the absence of large indirect fitness benefits and the influence of kin selection.     

Influence of sociality on allometric growth and morphological differentiation in sponge-dwelling alpheid shrimp

Eusocial societies are defined by a reproductive division of labour between breeders and nonbreeders that is often accompanied by morphological differentiation. Some eusocial taxa are further characterized by a subdivision of tasks among nonbreeders, often resulting in morphological differentiation among different groups (subcastes) that specialize on different sets of tasks. We investigated the possibility of morphological castes in eusocial shrimp colonies ( Zuzalpheus , formerly part of Synalpheus ) by comparing growth allometry and body proportions of three eusocial shrimp species with three pair-forming species (species where reproductive females and males occur in equal sex ratios). Allometry of eusocial species differed in several respects from that of pair-forming species in both lineages. First, allometry of fighting claw size among individuals other than female breeders was steeper in eusocial than in pair-forming species. Second, breeding females in eusocial colonies had proportionally smaller weapons (fighting claws) than females in pair-forming species. Finally, claw allometry changed with increasing colony size in eusocial species; large colonies showed a diphasic allometry of fighting claw and finger size, indicating a distinctive group of large individuals possessing relatively larger weapons than other colony members. Shrimp are thus similar to other eusocial animals in the morphological differentiation between breeders and nonbreeders, and in the indication that some larger nonbreeders might contribute more to defence than others.  © 2008 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2008, 94 , 527–540.     

Reproductive skew and group size: an N-person staying incentive model

Transactional models of social evolution emphasize that dominantbreeders may donate parcels of reproduction to subordinatesin return for peaceful cooperation. We develop a general transactionalmodel of reproductive partitioning and group size for N-persongroups when (1) expected group output is a concave (decelerating)functiong[N] of the number N of group members, and (2) thesubordinates may receive fractions of total group reproduction("staying incentives") just sufficient to induce them to stayand help the dominant instead of breeding solitarily. We focusespecially on "saturated" groups, that is, groups that havegrown in size just up to the point where subsequent joining by subordinates is no longer beneficial either to them (in parent-offspring groups) or to the dominant (in symmetric-relatedness groups).Decreased expected output for solitary breeding increases thesaturated group size and decreases the staying incentives.Increased relatedness decreases both the saturated group sizeand the staying incentives. However, in saturated groups withsymmetric relatedness, an individual subordinate's staying incentive converges to 1 — g[N^* — 1]/g[N^*]) regardless ofrelatedness, where N^* is the size of a saturated group, providedthat the g[N] function near the saturated group size N^* isapproximately linear. Thus, staying incentives can be insensitiveto relatedness in saturated groups, although the dominant's total fraction of reproduction (total skew) will be more sensitive.The predicted ordering for saturated group size is: Parent-fullsibling offspring = non-relatives > symmetrically relatedrelatives. Strikingly, stable groups of non-relatives can formfor concaveg[N] functions in our model but not in previousmodels of group size lacking skew manipulation by the dominant.Finally, symmetrical relatedness groups should tend to breakup by threatened ejections of subordinates by dominants, whereas parent-offspring groups should tend to breakup via unforceddepartures by subordinates.     

Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish

Several hypotheses aim to explain the evolution of helping behavior,but conclusive experimental support for evaluating the relativeimportance of individual hypotheses is still lacking. We reporton two field experiments conducted to test the "territory inheritance"and "pay-to-stay" hypotheses in the cooperatively breeding cichlidfish Neolamprologus pulcher The territory inheritance hypothesiswas tested by removing one parent, which created breeding vacancies.In 39% of cases, same-sex helpers took over the breeding spot;in 44% of cases helpers continued helping new breeders, and17% were evicted by new breeders. Helpers that were closelysize matched to the removed breeder had a better chance of gainingthe breeding spot Male helpers tended to continue helping aftera takeover more often than females.The pay-to-stay hypothesiswas tested-by temporarily removing helpers. Whereas breedersdid not respond aggressively to removals, other group membersattacked the removed helpers on their return, and 29% were eventuallyevicted. The returning helpers assisted more by increasing theirrate of territory maintenance and defense and visiting the broodchamber more frequently Size and sex of removed helpers didnot explain the observed aggressive reactions of other groupmembers. Thus, our results support both hypotheses: N. pulcherneeds to pay with help to be allowed to remain protected inthe family group, and there they may inherit the natal territory.N. pulcher helpers gain direct benefits from helping behavior.     

Spacing pattern and body size composition of the protandrous anemonefish Amphiprion frenatus inhabiting colonial host anemones

The protandrous anemonefish Amphiprion frenatus often forms a group consisting of a large female, a small male, and a smaller nonbreeder at an isolated single host anemone, where home ranges of subordinates were covered with the female's home range. Within the group, the dominant individuals suppress the growth of subordinates, resulting in large size differences. The spacing pattern and body size composition of A. frenatus on colonial hosts were investigated in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan. Six breeding pairs and 14 nonbreeders inhabited a colony of 157 anemones. Each pair maintained a territory in which pair members used different hosts. Nonbreeders had unstable home ranges on the outskirts of or in the pairs' territories. Body size differences between males and females in pairs and between males and nonbreeders were small. The small size differences in the colony of hosts are caused by reduced suppression of growth of subordinates by the dominant individuals. The total area of host anemones largely affects spacing pattern and social suppression of the anemonefish.     

Making use of multiple surveys: Estimating breeding probability using a multievent‐robust design capture–recapture model

Increased environmental stochasticity due to climate change will intensify temporal variance in the life‐history traits, and especially breeding probabilities, of long‐lived iteroparous species. These changes may decrease individual fitness and population viability and is therefore important to monitor. In wild animal populations with imperfect individual detection, breeding probabilities are best estimated using capture–recapture methods. However, in many vertebrate species (e.g., amphibians, turtles, seabirds), nonbreeders are unobservable because they are not tied to a territory or breeding location. Although unobservable states can be used to model temporary emigration of nonbreeders, there are disadvantages to having unobservable states in capture–recapture models. The best solution to deal with unobservable life‐history states is therefore to eliminate them altogether. Here, we achieve this objective by fitting novel multievent‐robust design models which utilize information obtained from multiple surveys conducted throughout the year. We use this approach to estimate annual breeding probabilities of capital breeding female elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). Conceptually, our approach parallels a multistate version of the Barker/robust design in that it combines robust design capture data collected during discrete breeding seasons with observations made at other times of the year. A substantial advantage of our approach is that the nonbreeder state became “observable” when multiple data sources were analyzed together. This allowed us to test for the existence of state‐dependent survival (with some support found for lower survival in breeders compared to nonbreeders), and to estimate annual breeding transitions to and from the nonbreeder state with greater precision (where current breeders tended to have higher future breeding probabilities than nonbreeders). We used program E‐SURGE (2.1.2) to fit the multievent‐robust design models, with uncertainty in breeding state assignment (breeder, nonbreeder) being incorporated via a hidden Markov process. This flexible modeling approach can easily be adapted to suit sampling designs from numerous species which may be encountered during and outside of discrete breeding seasons.     

Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew

Previously developed models of reproductive skew have overlooked one of the main reasons why subordinates might remain in a group despite restricted opportunities to breed: the possibility of social queuing, i.e. acquiring dominant status in the future. Here, we present a dynamic ESS model of skew in animal societies that incorporates both immediate and future fitness consequences of the decisions taken by group members, based on their probability of surviving from one season to the next (when post-breeding survival probabilities drop to zero, our analysis reduces to the model produced by Reeve and Ratnieks in 1993, which considered only a single breeding season). This allows us to compare the delayed benefits of philopatry and the immediate opportunities for independent breeding. We show that delayed benefits greatly reduce the need for dominants to offer reproductive concessions to retain subordinates peacefully in the group. Moreover, this effect is strong enough that differences in survival have a much greater impact on the group structure than differences in other parameters, such as relatedness. When the possibility of acceding to dominant status is taken into account, groups where the dominant completely monopolizes reproduction can be stable, even if they consist of unrelated individuals, and even if subordinates have a reasonably high probability of winning a fight for dominance. Finally, we show that stable groups are possible even if association leads to a decrease in current productivity. Subordinates may still stand to gain from group membership under these circumstances, as acquiring breeding positions by queuing may be more efficient than the attempt to establish a new territory. At the same time, the dominant may be unable to exclude unwelcome subordinates, may enjoy increased survival when they are present, or may gain indirect benefits from allowing relatives to stay and queue for dominance. We conclude that reproductive skew in animal groups, ranging from eusocial insect colonies to mating aggregations (leks), will be strongly influenced by the future prospects of group members.     

Linear and Stable Dominance Hierarchies in Cooperative Carrion Crows

Cooperatively breeding birds typically form cohesive and stable groups that live year‐round in all purpose territories where competition for resources is likely to arise. Understanding how group members negotiate over resources is crucial because conflicts may disrupt the stability of the group and may ultimately hinder cooperation. However, social relationships within the group have been largely neglected so far. Here we investigated how cooperatively breeding carrion crows (Corvus corone corone) share a food source, by observing dyadic interactions in 29 territories that contained retained offspring of the breeding pair and/or immigrants. We found that crows formed linear and stable dominance hierarchies, which were stronger for males than females. We suggest that this difference mirrors the level of competition for resources other than food, such as reproduction and territory inheritance, which is higher in males than females. Interestingly, immigrant males dominated male offspring, suggesting that, for the resident breeder, which is the alpha member of the group, the benefits of an association with an immigrant overcome the costs of having his sons pushed down in the hierarchy. Our study uncovered the key factors that determine hierarchical relationships among cooperatively breeding crows and highlighted the need of focussing on social interactions in every context of group living to fully explain the dynamic of cooperation at the nest.     

Optimal group size and seasonal stress in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta)

Adaptive explanations for social grouping assume that thereare fitness consequences associated with group size, and individualsmaintain membership in groups of favorable size to maximizefitness. Here I examine fecal cortisol concentrations as a hormonalmeasure of stress to assess the relative well-being of Lemurcatta in groups of different size and in seasons of normal andlow tamarind fruit availability. I test the hypotheses thatthere is an optimal group size at which cortisol is lowest andthat optimal group size changes in food-scarce conditions. Icollected 799 fecal samples from 87 individuals in seven free-rangingL. catta groups at Berenty Reserve, Madagascar, over a 1-yearperiod (August 1999–July 2000) and determined fecal cortisolconcentrations using a radioimmunoassay. Expressing these asresiduals from monthly population means to control for temporalfluctuations in cortisol concentration, I calculated mean fecalcortisol levels for each animal in seasons of normal and lowtamarind fruit abundance and over the entire year. Overall,females exhibited lowest mean cortisol levels in groups of intermediatesize, suggesting that there are benefits to maintaining membershipin these groups. Females in groups that were atypically largeor small for their habitat type had higher mean cortisol levelsthan typical groups. Cortisol levels increased in food-scarceconditions for larger groups, suggesting that intergroup competitiveadvantages do not outweigh intragroup feeding competition atthis time. Group size may be optimized for long-term averageconditions, and short-term stresses may intermittently alterthe costs associated with group size.     

Determinants of reproductive success in dominant pairs of clownfish: a boosted regression tree analysis

1. Central questions of behavioural and evolutionary ecology are what factors influence the reproductive success of dominant breeders and subordinate nonbreeders within animal societies? A complete understanding of any society requires that these questions be answered for all individuals. 2. The clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula, forms simple societies that live in close association with sea anemones, Heteractis magnifica. Here, we use data from a well-studied population of A. percula to determine the major predictors of reproductive success of dominant pairs in this species. 3. We analyse the effect of multiple predictors on four components of reproductive success, using a relatively new technique from the field of statistical learning: boosted regression trees (BRTs). BRTs have the potential to model complex relationships in ways that give powerful insight. 4. We show that the reproductive success of dominant pairs is unrelated to the presence, number or phenotype of nonbreeders. This is consistent with the observation that nonbreeders do not help or hinder breeders in any way, confirming and extending the results of a previous study. 5. Primarily, reproductive success is negatively related to male growth and positively related to breeding experience. It is likely that these effects are interrelated because males that grow a lot have little breeding experience. These effects are indicative of a trade-off between male growth and parental investment. 6. Secondarily, reproductive success is positively related to female growth and size. In this population, female size is positively related to group size and anemone size, also. These positive correlations among traits likely are caused by variation in site quality and are suggestive of a silver-spoon effect. 7. Noteworthily, whereas reproductive success is positively related to female size, it is unrelated to male size. This observation provides support for the size advantage hypothesis for sex change: both individuals maximize their reproductive success when the larger individual adopts the female tactic. 8. This study provides the most complete picture to date of the factors that predict the reproductive success of dominant pairs of clown anemonefish and illustrates the utility of BRTs for analysis of complex behavioural and evolutionary ecology data.     

Dispersal strategies in Tasmanian native hens (Gallinula mortierii)

Individuals in cooperatively breeding species face a complexset of decisions when they reach reproductive maturity. Duringan 8-year study, we examined the histories of 214 Tasmaniannative hens (Gallinula mortierii) from hatching to examinethe strategies they used to acquire breeding positions andthe reproductive success they experienced in those breedingpositions. Two-thirds of young delayed dispersal from theirnatal groups for at least a year. Ecological constraints werea partial cause of delayed dispersal; high-quality territorieswere rare and remained occupied due to high adult survivorship.There were also clear benefits of philopatry. Individuals thatinherited breeding positions on their natal territories gainedbetter quality positions and experienced higher reproductivesuccess in their first breeding attempts than did individualswho dispersed to other groups. Multivariate analyses showedthat the method of acquisition of breeding positions was theonly factor significantly related to the quality of the breedingpositions attained. Males were more likely to inherit breeding positions in their natal groups than were females. The compositionsof individuals' natal groups had no effect on whether theyinherited breeding positions or dispersed. In contrast, thecompositions of groups did appear to affect whether other birdsdispersed into them, with birds rarely moving into groups thatcontained breeders or nonbreeders of the same sex as the potential dispersers. Short-term removals of breeders confirmed this finding.These results suggest that both ecological constraints andbenefits of philopatry explain delayed dispersal in this species.     

Long-term memory for affiliates in ravens

Complex social life requires individuals to recognize and remember group members and, within those, to distinguish affiliates from nonaffiliates. Whereas long-term individual recognition has been demonstrated in some nonhuman animals, memory for the relationship valence to former group members has received little attention. Here we show that adult, pair-housed ravens not only respond differently to the playback of calls from previous group members and unfamiliar conspecifics but also discriminate between familiar birds according to the relationship valence they had to those subjects up to three years ago as subadult nonbreeders. The birds' distinction between familiar and unfamiliar individuals is reflected mainly in the number of calls, whereas their differentiation according to relationship valence is reflected in call modulation only. As compared to their response to affiliates, ravens responded to nonaffiliates by increasing chaotic parts of the vocalization and lowering formant spacing, potentially exaggerating the perceived impression of body size. Our findings indicate that ravens remember relationship qualities to former group members even after long periods of separation, confirming that their sophisticated social knowledge as nonbreeders is maintained into the territorial breeding stage.     

Acquisition of Breeding Space by Nonbreeders in the Anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii in Temperate Waters of Southern Japan

Behavior of Amphiprion clarkii, especially of nonbreeders, was investigated at the shore of boulders and rocks in Uwa Sea, southern Japan. All individuals except small ones under one year were tagged. Movements of A. clarkii between host sea anemones were usual in this study area where host anemones were abundant, unlike in the general habitat (coral reefs) of Amphiprion, where movements between hosts are restricted. Monogamous pairs established almost contiguous territories containing all hosts except small ones. Nonbreeders had home ranges on the fringes of the pairs' territories and sheltered in relatively small hosts. Breeding spaces were saturated with breeders and were available for nonbreeders only after disappearance of one or both members of an established breeding pair. Home ranges of nonbreeders of similar body size were spaced out, due perhaps to competition for breeding spaces. It is suggested that large nonbreeders refrained from becoming females to keep their gonads ambosexual, so that they could replace either sex in a territory as breeding space became available, or, in pairing with other nonbreeders, the larger fish of the pair could take the female role.