颞部Gillies切口在颧骨复合体骨折手术中的应用

目的:颞部Gillies切口在颧骨复合体骨折手术中的应用效果。方法:运用颞部Gillies切口治疗25例病人颧骨复合体骨折,观察手术进路,显露术区,在直视下行颧骨骨折复位内固定术。结果:25例患者应用此术式均可显露骨折区域,满足颧骨复合体骨折的手术显露需要,而且与常规颧骨复合体骨折(头皮冠状切口)手术相比,减小了出血及损伤神经的可能。结论:颞部Gillies切口在颧骨复合体骨折手术中优于其它手术路径,值得临床推广。     

两种联合切口手术治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折的对比研究

目的：对比研究冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术与冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折的治疗效果。方法：选取2006年10月-2010年12月眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折患者136例,69例患者行冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术,67例行冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术,分别命名为A组和B组,比较两组患者治疗效果,治疗效果用甲级、乙级和丙级表示。结果：A组治疗效果甲级、乙级、丙级分别为65．2％、30．4％、4．4％,B组治疗效果甲级、乙级、丙级分别为46．3％、29．8％、23．9％,A组治疗效果优于B组;A组术后并发症少于B组。结论：冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术比冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术更好地治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折,治疗效果好,并发症少,能更好地实现颧骨复位。     

两种联合切口手术治疗眶- 上颌- 颧骨复合体骨折的对比研究

目的:对比研究冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术与冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折的治疗效果。方法:选取2006年10月～2010年12月眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折患者136例,69例患者行冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术,67例行冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术,分别命名为A组和B组,比较两组患者治疗效果,治疗效果用甲级、乙级和丙级表示。结果:A组治疗效果甲级、乙级、丙级分别为65.2%、30.4%、4.4%,B组治疗效果甲级、乙级、丙级分别为46.3%、29.8%、23.9%,A组治疗效果优于B组;A组术后并发症少于B组。结论:冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术比冠状切口联合口腔前庭沟切口手术更好地治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合体骨折,治疗效果好,并发症少,能更好地实现颧骨复位。     

冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口手术治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折

目的：探讨经冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口行眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折坚强内固定术的临床应用价值。方法：回顾性分析69例患者经冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口行眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折解剖复位,钛板坚强内固定。结果：69例均一期愈合,68例治疗效果优良,1例治疗效果欠佳;2例轻度睑外翻,两周后恢复正常,无额纹变浅、面神经损伤等其他并发症。结论：冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口具有切口隐蔽、面部疤痕不明显、显露充分、并发症少等优点,是治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折的良好手术进路。     

颧颞部骨折术后并发颞部凹陷的临床回顾性研究

目的：分析不同颧颞部骨折性质与颞部凹陷的相关性,评价颧颞部骨折术后并发颞部凹陷的防治效果。方法：对105例颧颞部骨折病例进行回顾性分析,52例患者行颞部凹陷修复术,采用头皮冠状切口,应用钛网修复颞部凹陷,术后通过长期随访评价治疗效果。结果：陈旧性骨折颞部凹陷的发生率显著高于新鲜骨折,但治疗后颞部外形均有明显改善。结论：钛网植入能有效地修复颧颞部骨折术后并发的颞部凹陷,但应把握手术时机及治疗方法。     

冠状- 睑下缘- 口内联合切口手术治疗眶- 上颌- 颧骨复合骨折

目的:探讨经冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口行眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折坚强内固定术的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析69例患者经冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口行眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折解剖复位,钛板坚强内固定。结果:69例均一期愈合,68例治疗效果优良,1例治疗效果欠佳;2例轻度睑外翻,两周后恢复正常,无额纹变浅、面神经损伤等其他并发症。结论:冠状-睑下缘-口内联合切口具有切口隐蔽、面部疤痕不明显、显露充分、并发症少等优点,是治疗眶-上颌-颧骨复合骨折的良好手术进路。     

颧颞部骨折术后并发颞部凹陷的临床回顾性研究

目的:分析不同颧颞部骨折性质与颞部凹陷的相关性,评价颧颞部骨折术后并发颞部凹陷的防治效果。方法:对105例颧颞部骨折病例进行回顾性分析,52例患者行颞部凹陷修复术,采用头皮冠状切口,应用钛网修复颞部凹陷,术后通过长期随访评价治疗效果。结果:陈旧性骨折颞部凹陷的发生率显著高于新鲜骨折,但治疗后颞部外形均有明显改善。结论:钛网植入能有效地修复颧颞部骨折术后并发的颞部凹陷,但应把握手术时机及治疗方法。     

前外侧与后外侧路小切口髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较研究

目的:研究前外侧入路(ASA)与后外侧入路(PSA)小切口髋关节置换术对老年股骨颈骨折的治疗效果,为临床手术入路的选择提供参考。方法:选自我院于2014年3月至2016年6月间收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者共98例作为研究对象,并根据其治疗的手术入路方式分为ASA组和PSA组,各49例。记录两组患者切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、引流量,并对患者进行为期半年的随访。采用Harris评分对患者髋关节功能恢复情况进行评价。观察记录患者并发症发生情况。结果:ASA组患者围术期切口长度短于PSA组患者,手术时间、术中出血量和引流量均明显少于PSA组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者术后Harris评分均较术前显著提高,且随着随访时间的延长Harris评分逐步增加(P0.05),但组间同时期比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。ASA组患者并发症发生率为2.04%,低于PSA组的14.29%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:ASA与PSA小切口髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折具有较好的治疗效果,均有利于患者的髋关节功能恢复,但ASA小切口髋关节置换术具有切口小、手术时间短、术中出血量和引流量低的优点,同时安全性较高,在老年股骨颈骨折的治疗中具有较高的临床价值。     

小切口后外侧入路全髋关节置换术与早期康复训练对老年股骨颈骨折患者髋关节功能的影响

目的:探讨小切口后外侧入路全髋关节置换术与早期康复训练对老年股骨颈骨折患者髋关节功能的影响及其临床效果分析。方法:选取2013年5月-2016年5月在我院接受治疗的老年股骨颈骨折患者327例,根据手术方法不同,将患者分为小切口组(169)和常规切口组(158例),分别采用小切口后外侧入路全髋关节置换术和常规切口后外侧入路全髋关节置换术,同时配合早期康复训练。观察并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、髋关节Harris评分、VAS及VRS疼痛评分、生活质量评分。结果:小切口组术中出血量、住院时间均少于常规切口组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组术后Harris评分均高于术前,且小切口组高于常规切口组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后VAS及VRS评分均显著低于术前,且小切口组低于常规切口组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组早期康复训练后生活质量评分均高于训练前,且小切口组高于常规切口组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:早期康复训练配合小切口后外侧入路髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床效果显著,具有创伤小、出血量少、髋关节恢复快等优点,值得临床推广应用。     

不同类型的下颌骨骨折的手术治疗

目的：评估不同类型的下颌骨骨折的手术入路及固定方法。方法：对于52例不同类型下颌骨骨折患者采用不同的口外或口内切口及相应的固定方法。结果：52例患者伤口全部一期愈合,51例咬合关系恢复到伤前咬合关系,1例出现咬合关系不良,X线检查骨折线队位良好。结论：对于不同部位的下颌骨骨折应采用相应的手术切口及固定方法,以获得最好的疗效。     

Reduction malarplasty through an intraoral incision: a new method

Until recently, osteotomies and surgeries to reposition prominent zygoma have been performed by means of a coronal incision or intraoral and preauricular incisions. Such incisions have penalties such as scars, the possibility of facial nerve injury, and long operative times. After reflecting on their past experiences with facial bone surgery, the authors developed an alternative approach. In this method, the cheekbone protrusion is corrected by performing an osteotomy and repositioning through an intraoral incision only. During the past 3 years, the authors have operated on 23 patients with malar prominences. The amount of bone to be removed is determined by preoperative interviews, physical examinations, and x-rays. Intraoral incisions provide access to the zygomatic body and lateral orbital rim. After L-shaped osteotomies (two parallel vertical and one transverse osteotomy at the medial part of the zygomatic body), the midsegment is removed. The posterior portion of the zygomatic arch was approached through the medial aspect and was outfractured using a curved osteotome. After completing the triple osteotomy, the movable zygomatic complex was reduced medially and fixed with miniplates and screws on the zygomaticomaxillary buttress. The patients were followed for 9.5 months, with acceptable results and few complications. The authors conclude that this technique is an effective and safe method of reduction malarplasty.     

The importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midfacial fracture repair and correction of posttraumatic orbitozygomatic deformities

Collapse of the zygomatic arch following trauma results in inadequate anteroposterior projection of the zygomatic body and an increase in facial width. Accurate assessment of the position of the zygomatic arch in relation to the cranial base posteriorly and the midface anteriorly is the key to the acute repair of complex midfacial fractures and the secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic deformities of the orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex. Loss of projection of the zygomatic arch may occur with injuries confined to the orbitozygomaticomaxillary region or in association with complex midfacial fractures. A safe anatomic approach to the zygomatic arch allows exact anatomic restoration of the zygomatic arch using miniplates and screws and results in the reconstruction of an outer facial frame with a correct anteroposterior projection and facial width. The zygomatic arch injury is diagnosed using axial CT scanning. Three-hundred and seventeen arches have been exposed through a coronal incision following acute trauma and 47 arches have been exposed in patients requiring late correction of a posttraumatic orbitozygomaticomaxillary deformity. Permanent palsy to the frontal branch of the facial nerve has occurred in one patient following the exact definition of the anatomy of this region.     

Single eyelid incision for exposure of the zygomatic bone and orbital reconstruction

Experience with a single lower eyelid incision with mobilization of the lateral canthus is described for exposure of the zygoma, lower and lateral orbit, and zygomaticofrontal suture. The incision may be either subciliary with a skin-muscle flap or transconjunctival. Both require mobilization of the canthus. Reattachment of the canthus is not required in acute zygomatic fracture treatment but is preferred for secondary orbital reconstruction or in patients in whom a simultaneous coronal incision is employed. The approaches described reduce cutaneous scarring and provide generous exposure of the lower and lateral orbit. Predictable and improved aesthetic results are routinely achieved.     

Exposure through a coronal incision for initial treatment of facial fractures.

The coronal incision approach to Le Fort III fractures gives excellent exposure for anatomical reduction and internal fixation of the fracture sites. Either an extracranial, or a combined intracranial procedure, is feasible. The exposure obtained not only facilitates the reduction and the fixation but, with the addition of transconjunctival incisions, the patient benefits by not having multiple surgical scars in the face.     

Subciliary versus subtarsal approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the anatomic differences in the subciliary versus the subtarsal approach. 2. Discuss the difference between the "skin-only" and the "skin-muscle flap" variations of the subciliary approach. 3. Discuss the potential complications of both approaches. 4. Discuss the advantages of the subtarsal approach versus the subciliary approach. Many incisions have been described for approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures, the most frequently used being the subciliary incision with its modifications, the subtarsal incision, and the transconjunctival incision with or without lateral canthotomy. Each of these approaches has its advantages and disadvantages that may make it more or less appealing to use depending on the patient's age and severity of fracture. A balance must be struck between adequate exposure and acceptable cosmetic result. This article reviews the literature with particular respect to the transcutaneous approaches of subciliary versus subtarsal techniques in the treatment of orbitozygomatic fractures.