CD36 is differentially expressed by CD8+ splenic dendritic cells but is not required for cross-presentation in vivo

Cross-presentation allows the processing of Ags from donor cells into the MHC class I presentation pathway of dendritic cells (DCs). This is important for the generation of cytotoxic T cell immunity and for induction of self tolerance. Apoptotic cells are reported to be efficient targets for cross-presentation, and in vitro studies using human DCs have implicated CD36 in their capture. In support of a role for CD36 in cross-presentation, we show that this molecule is differentially expressed by CD8(+) splenic DCs, which previously have been identified as responsible for cross-presentation in the mouse. Three different cross-presentation models were examined for their dependence on CD36. These included cross-priming to OVA-coated spleen cells and cross-tolerance to OVA transgenically expressed in the pancreatic islet beta cells under constitutive conditions or during beta cell destruction. In these models, CD36 knockout DCs were equivalent to wild-type DCs in their capacity to cross-present either foreign or self Ags, indicating that CD36 is not essential for cross-presentation of cellular Ags in vivo.     

Dendritic cells cross-dressed with peptide MHC class I complexes prime CD8+ T cells

The activation of naive CD8+ T cells has been attributed to two mechanisms: cross-priming and direct priming. Cross-priming and direct priming differ in the source of Ag and in the cell that presents the Ag to the responding CD8+ T cells. In cross-priming, exogenous Ag is acquired by professional APCs, such as dendritic cells (DC), which process the Ag into peptides that are subsequently presented. In direct priming, the APCs, which may or may not be DC, synthesize and process the Ag and present it themselves to CD8+ T cells. In this study, we demonstrate that naive CD8+ T cells are activated by a third mechanism, called cross-dressing. In cross-dressing, DC directly acquire MHC class I-peptide complexes from dead, but not live, donor cells by a cell contact-mediated mechanism, and present the intact complexes to naive CD8+ T cells. Such DC are cross-dressed because they are wearing peptide-MHC complexes generated by other cells. CD8+ T cells activated by cross-dressing are restricted to the MHC class I genotype of the donor cells and are specific for peptides generated by the donor cells. In vivo studies demonstrate that optimal priming of CD8+ T cells requires both cross-priming and cross-dressing. Thus, cross-dressing may be an important mechanism by which DC prime naive CD8+ T cells and may explain how CD8+ T cells are primed to Ags that are inefficiently cross-presented.     

Influenza A infection enhances cross-priming of CD8+ T cells to cell-associated antigens in a TLR7- and type I IFN-dependent fashion

The initiation of antitumor immunity relies on dendritic cells (DCs) to cross-present cell-associated tumor Ag to CD8(+) T cells (T(CD8+)) due to a lack of costimulatory molecules on tumor cells. Innate danger signals have been demonstrated to enhance cross-priming of T(CD8+) to soluble as well as virally encoded Ags; however, their effect on enhancing T(CD8+) cross-priming to cell genome-encoded Ags remains unknown. Furthermore, influenza A virus (IAV) has not been shown to enhance antitumor immunity. Using influenza-infected allogeneic cell lines, we show in this study that T(CD8+) responses to cell-associated Ags can be dramatically enhanced due to enhanced T(CD8+) expansion. This enhanced cross-priming in part involves TLR7- but not TLR3-mediated sensing of IAV and is entirely dependent on MyD88 and IFN signaling pathways. We also showed that the inflammasome-induced IL-1 and IFN-γ did not play a role in enhancing cross-priming in our system. We further demonstrated in our ex vivo system that CD8(+) DCs are the only APCs able to prime TCR-transgenic T(CD8+). Importantly, plasmacytoid DCs and CD8(-) DCs were both able to enhance such priming when provided in coculture. These observations suggest that IAV infection of tumor cells may facilitate improved cross-presentation of tumor Ags and may be used to augment clinical vaccine efficacy.     

TNF-alpha coupled to membrane of apoptotic cells favors the cross-priming to melanoma antigens

The cross-presentation of Ags derived from apoptotic cell processing contributes to peripheral tolerance. Environmental signals possibly modify this default outcome, favoring cross-priming. In this study, we anchored via a biotin-avidin-biotin bridge soluble TNF-alpha to the membrane of apoptotic melanoma cells and studied in vivo and in vitro the interaction with Ag-presenting phagocytes. TNF-alpha-coated apoptotic melanoma cells injected s.c. had a faster and more efficient access to draining lymph nodes, with cross-priming of melanoma-specific CTLs and delayed outgrowth of melanomas in all treated animals. Twenty percent of the animals, in the absence of further adjuvant, did not develop the tumor. Immature dendritic cells challenged with TNF-alpha-coated apoptotic melanoma cells secreted proinflammatory cytokines in an autocrine/paracrine fashion, efficiently matured, as assessed functionally and by flow cytometry and cross-presented with enhanced efficiency melanoma Ags to MHC class I- and II-restricted T cells. The results indicate that TNF-alpha targeted to apoptotic membranes, at concentrations that can be safely reached in growing tumors without undue systemic toxicity, influences the outcome of the disposal of dying cells and enhances tumor immunogenicity.     

Neutrophil involvement in cross-priming CD8+ T cell responses to bacterial antigens

Substantial CD8(+) T cell responses are generated after infection of mice with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes strains expressing a model epitope (lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus NP(118-126)) in secreted and nonsecreted forms. L. monocytogenes gains access to the cytosol of infected cells, where secreted Ags can be accessed by the endogenous MHC class I presentation pathway. However, the route of presentation of the nonsecreted Ag in vivo remains undefined. In this study we show that neutrophil-enriched peritoneal exudate cells from L. monocytogenes-infected mice can serve as substrates for in vitro cross-presentation of both nonsecreted and secreted Ag by dendritic cells as well as for in vivo cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells. In addition, specific neutrophil depletion in vivo by low dose treatment with either of two Ly6G-specific mAb substantially decreased the relative CD8(+) T cell response against the nonsecreted, but not the secreted, Ag compared with control Ab-treated mice. Thus, neutrophils not only provide rapid innate defense against infection, but also contribute to shaping the specificity and breadth of the CD8(+) T cell response. In addition, cross-presentation of bacterial Ags from neutrophils may explain how CD8(+) T cell responses are generated against Ags from extracellular bacterial pathogens.     

Dendritic cells are sufficient to cross-present self-antigens to CD8 T cells in vivo

The mechanism of cross-presentation enables professional APCs to induce CD8 T cell-mediated immune responses against exogenous Ags. Through this mechanism, APCs can induce either immunity against infectious pathogens or tolerance against self-Ag residing in extralymphatic locations. An unanswered question in this field concerns the identity of the cross-presenting APC. All major classes of professional APCs, particularly dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells, have previously been shown to be able to cross-present Ags in vitro. In the present study, we have created transgenic mice where MHC class I expression is driven selectively in dendritic cells and provide direct in vivo evidence that dendritic cells are sufficient to cross-present exogenous self-Ags and induce Ag-specific cell division of CD8-positive T cells.     

Protective CD8 T cell immunity triggered by CpG-protein conjugates competes with the efficacy of live vaccines

In contrast to infectious (live) vaccines are those based on subunit Ag that are notoriously poor in eliciting protective CD8 T cell responses, presumably because subunit Ags become insufficiently cross-presented by dendritic cells (DCs) and because the latter need to be activated to acquire competence for cross-priming. In this study, we show that CpG-Ag complexes overcome these limitations. OVA covalently linked to CpG-DNA (CpG-OVA complex), once it is efficiently internalized by DCs via DNA receptor-mediated endocytosis, is translocated to lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1)-positive endosomal-lysosomal compartments recently shown to display competence for cross-presentation. In parallel, CpG-OVA complex loaded DCs become activated and acquire characteristics of professional APCs. In vivo, a single s.c. dose of CpG-OVA complex (10 mug of protein) induces primary and secondary clonal expansion/contraction of Ag-specific CD8 T cells similar in kinetics to live vaccines; examples including Listeria monocytogenes genetically engineered to produce OVA (LM-OVA) and two viral vector-based OVA vaccines analyzed. Interestingly, CpG-OVA complex induced almost equal percentages of Ag-specific memory CD8 T cells as did infection with LM-OVA. A single dose vaccination with CpG-OVA complex protected mice against lethal doses of LM-OVA. These data underscore that the synergy imparted by CpG-OVA complex-mediated combined triggering of innate and specific immunity might be key to initiate CD8 T cell-based immunoprotection by synthetic vaccines based on subunit Ag.     

Factors affecting the efficiency of CD8+ T cell cross-priming with exogenous antigens

Processing of exogenous protein Ags by APC leads predominantly to presentation of peptides on class II MHC and, thus, stimulation of CD4+ T cell responses. However, "cross-priming" can also occur, whereby peptides derived from exogenous Ags become displayed on class I MHC molecules and stimulate CD8+ T cell responses. We compared the efficiency of cross-priming with exogenous proteins to use of peptide Ags in human whole blood using a flow cytometry assay to detect T cell intracellular cytokine production. CD8+ T cell responses to whole CMV proteins were poorly detected (compared with peptide responses) in most CMV-seropositive donors. Such responses could be increased by using higher doses of Ag than were required to achieve maximal CD4+ T cell responses. A minority of donors displayed significantly more efficient CD8+ T cell responses to whole protein, even at low Ag doses. These responses were MHC class I-restricted and dependent upon proteosomal processing, indicating that they were indeed due to cross-priming. The ability to efficiently cross-prime was not a function of the number of dendritic cells in the donor's blood. Neither supplementation of freshly isolated dendritic cells nor use of cultured, Ag-pulsed dendritic cells could significantly boost CD8 responses to whole-protein Ags in poorly cross-priming donors. Interestingly, freshly isolated monocytes performed almost as well as dendritic cells in inducing CD8 responses via cross-priming. In conclusion, the efficiency of cross-priming appears to be poor in most donors and is dependent upon properties of the individual's APC and/or T cell repertoire. It remains unknown whether cross-priming ability translates into any clinical advantage in ability to induce CD8+ T cell responses to foreign Ags.     

TRAIL/DR5 plays a critical role in NK cell-mediated negative regulation of dendritic cell cross-priming of T cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are critical in initiating immune responses by cross-priming of tumor Ags to T cells. Previous results showed that NK cells inhibited DC-mediated cross-presentation of tumor Ags both in vivo and in vitro. In this study, enhanced Ag presentation was observed in draining lymph nodes in TRAIL(-/-) and DR5(-/-) mice compared with that of wild-type mice. NK cells inhibit DC cross-priming of tumor Ags in vitro, but not direct presentation of endogenous Ags. NK cells lacking TRAIL, but not perforin, were not able to inhibit DC cross-priming of tumor Ags. DCs that lack expression of TRAIL receptor DR5 were less susceptible to NK cell-mediated inhibition of cross-priming, and cross-linking of DR5 receptor led to reduced generation of MHC class I-Ag peptide complexes, followed by attenuated cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells. In addition, key molecules involved in the TRAIL/DR5 pathway during DC/NK cell interactions were determined. In summary, these data indicate a novel alternative pathway for DC/NK cell interactions in antitumor immunity and may reflect homeostasis of both DCs and NK cells for regulation of CD8(+) T cell function in physiological conditions.     

CD8 T cells specific for a donor-derived, self-restricted transplant antigen are nonpathogenic bystanders after vascularized heart transplantation in mice

CD8 T cell cross-priming, an established mechanism of protective antiviral immunity, was originally discovered during studies involving minor transplantation Ags. It is unclear whether or how cross-primed CD8 T cells, reactive to donor-derived, but recipient class I MHC-restricted epitopes, could injure a fully MHC-disparate, vascularized transplant. To address this question we studied host class I MHC-restricted, male transplantation Ag-reactive T cell responses in female recipients of fully MHC-disparate, male heart transplants. Cross-priming to the immune-dominant determinant HYUtyp occurred at low frequency after heart transplantation. CD8 T cell preactivation through immunization with HYUtyp mixed in CFA did not alter the kinetics of acute rejection. Furthermore, neither HYUtyp immunization nor adoptive transfer of HYUtyp-specific TCR-transgenic T cells affected outcome in 1) a model of chronic rejection in the absence of immunosuppression or 2) a model of allograft acceptance induced by costimulatory blockade. The results support the contention that CD8 T cells reactive to host-restricted, but donor-derived, Ags are highly specific and are nonpathogenic bystanders during rejection of MHC-disparate cardiac allografts.     

Cross-priming of T cell responses by synthetic microspheres carrying a CD8+ T cell epitope requires an adjuvant signal

Controlling the cross-presentation of exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells represents a major step for designing new vaccination strategies. Whereas several recombinant pseudo-viral particles have been used as delivery systems for triggering potent CTL responses to heterologous exogenous Ags, the adjuvant properties of virus-like particles (VLPs) themselves were little questioned. Here, we analyzed the contribution of the porcine parvovirus (PPV)-VLPs to the induction of protective cellular responses to exogenous Ags carried by an independent delivery system. Microspheres, which are known to transfer exogenous Ags into the MHC class I pathway, were chosen for delivering the immunodominant OVA(257-264) CD8+ T cell epitope (B-OVAp). This delivery system fulfills the requirements in terms of cross-presentation, but fails to induce cross-priming of specific CD8+ T cells. Coinjection of PPV-VLPs with B-OVAp results in the priming of potent CTL responses and type 1-biased immunity in a CD4- and CD40-independent manner, as efficiently as the recombinant PPV-VLPs carrying the same epitope (PPV-OVAp). Furthermore, vaccination with PPV-VLPs and B-OVAp was fully efficient to protect mice against the development of OVA-bearing melanoma. These findings indicate that PPV-VLPs act not only as a delivery system but also as a strong adjuvant when independently provided with exogenous Ag. Thus, dissociation between delivery system and adjuvant would provide a more flexible and reliable system to induce potent and protective CTL.     

Listeria monocytogenes infection overcomes the requirement for CD40 ligand in exogenous antigen presentation to CD8(+) T cells.

In vivo priming of CD8(+) T lymphocytes against exogenously processed model Ags requires CD4(+) T cell help, specifically interactions between CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressed by activated CD4(+) T cells and CD40, which is present on professional APC such as dendritic cells (DCs). To address this issue in the context of bacterial infection, we examined CD40L-CD40 interactions in CD8(+) T cell priming against an exogenously processed, nonsecreted bacterial Ag. CD40L interactions were blocked by in vivo treatment with anti-CD40L mAb MR-1, which inhibited germinal center formation and CD8(+) T cell cross-priming against an exogenous model Ag, OVA. In contrast, MR-1 treatment did not interfere with CD8(+) T cell priming against a nonsecreted or secreted recombinant Ag expressed by Listeria monocytogenes. Memory and secondary responses of CD8(+) T cells against nonsecreted and secreted bacterial Ags were also largely unimpaired by transient MR-1 treatment. When MR-1-treated mice were concurrently immunized with L. monocytogenes and OVA-loaded splenocytes, cross-priming of OVA-specific naive CD8(+) T cells occurred. No significant decline in cross-priming against OVA was measured when either TNF or IFN-gamma was neutralized in L. monocytogenes-infected animals, demonstrating that multiple signals exist to overcome CD40L blockade of CD8(+) T cell cross-priming during bacterial infection. These data support a model in which DCs can be stimulated in vivo through signals other than CD40, becoming APC that can effectively stimulate CD8(+) T cell responses against exogenous Ags during infection.     

Molecular and cellular requirements for enhanced antigen cross-presentation to CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes

MHC class I-mediated cross-priming of CD8 T cells by APCs is critical for CTL-based immunity to viral infections and tumors. We have shown previously that tumor-secreted heat shock protein gp96-chaperoned peptides cross prime CD8 CTL that are specific for genuine tumor Ags and for the surrogate Ag OVA. We now show that tumor-secreted heat shock protein gp96-chaperoned peptides enhance the efficiency of Ag cross-priming of CD8 CTL by several million-fold over the cross-priming activity of unchaperoned protein alone. Gp96 also acts as adjuvant for cross-priming by unchaperoned proteins, but in this capacity gp96 is 1000-fold less active than as a peptide chaperone. Mechanistically, the in situ secretion of gp96-Ig by transfected tumor cells recruits and activates dendritic cells and NK cells to the site of gp96 release and promotes CD8 CTL expansion locally. Gp96-mediated cross-priming of CD8 T cells requires B7.1/2 costimulation but proceeds unimpeded in lymph node-deficient mice, in the absence of NKT and CD4 cells and without CD40L. Gp96-driven MHC I cross-priming of CD8 CTL in the absence of lymph nodes provides a novel mechanism for local, tissue-based CTL generation at the site of gp96 release. This pathway may constitute a critically important, early detection, and rapid response mechanism that is operative in parenchymal tissues for effective defense against tissue damaging antigenic agents.     

Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells can be deleted by soluble, but not cross-presented antigen

Under noninflammatory conditions, both naive and central memory CD8 T cells can be eliminated in the periphery with either soluble peptide or cross-presented Ag. Here, we assess the tolerance susceptibility of tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells in mice to these two forms of tolerogen. Soluble peptide specifically eliminated the majority of memory CD8 cells present in both lymphoid and extralymphoid tissues including lung and liver, but was unable to reduce the number present in the CNS. In contrast, systemic cross-presentation of Ag by dendritic cells resulted in successful elimination of memory cells only from the spleen, with no significant reduction in the numbers of tissue-resident memory cells in the lung. The fact that tissue-resident memory cells were unable to access cross-presented Ag suggests that either the memory cells in the lung do not freely circulate out of the tissue, or that they circulate through a region in the spleen devoid of cross-presented Ag. Thus, although tissue-resident memory cells are highly susceptible to tolerance induction, both the form of tolerogen and location of the T cells can determine their accessibility to tolerogen and the degree to which they are successfully deleted from specific tissues.     

Antigen concentration and precursor frequency determine the rate of CD8+ T cell tolerance to peripherally expressed antigens.

Expression of transgene-encoded proteins in the pancreatic islets can cause peripheral deletion of T cells. However, tolerance has not been observed in all transgenic models. It has been proposed that the determining factor for successful peripheral tolerance is the amount of Ag cross-presented by quiescent APCs. Using InsHA mice, which demonstrate peripheral tolerance to the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) expressed in the pancreatic islet beta cells, we have investigated the consequences when different amounts of HA are expressed. As compared with InsHA mice that are heterozygous for the InsHA transgene, homozygous InsHA mice demonstrated enhanced activation and proliferation of Kd-restricted HA-specific CD8+ T cells in the pancreatic lymph nodes. However, despite such activation, insulitis was not observed, and the T cells were gradually functionally deleted. Deletion of these activated cells occurred much more rapidly in homozygous than in heterozygous InsHA mice. These data demonstrate that there is a direct correlation between the amount of HA expressed in the periphery, and both the degree of T cell proliferation in the pancreatic lymph nodes and the rate of tolerance of HA-specific CD8+ T cells. This strongly supports the hypothesis that activation of T cells through cross-presentation of peripheral Ags in a noninflammatory environment is an important part of the normal mechanism of tolerance to Ags expressed in the pancreatic islets.     

Efficient presentation of exogenous antigen by liver endothelial cells to CD8+ T cells results in antigen-specific T-cell tolerance

Myeloid antigen-presenting cells (APC) are known to cross-present exogenous antigen on major histocompatibility class I molecules to CD8+ T cells and thereby induce protective immunity against infecting microorganisms. Here we report that liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) are organ-resident, non-myeloid APC capable of cross-presenting soluble exogenous antigen to CD8+ T cells. Though LSEC employ similar molecular mechanisms for cross-presentation as dendritic cells, the outcome of cross-presentation by LSEC is CD8+ T cell tolerance rather than immunity. As uptake of circulating antigens into LSEC occurs efficiently in vivo, it is likely that cross-presentation by LSEC contributes to CD8+ T cell tolerance observed in situations where soluble antigen is present in the circulation.     

Antigen persistence is required for dendritic cell licensing and CD8+ T cell cross-priming

It has been demonstrated that CD4(+) T cells require Ag persistence to achieve effective priming, whereas CD8(+) T cells are on "autopilot" after only a brief exposure. This finding presents a disturbing conundrum as it does not account for situations in which CD8(+) T cells require CD4(+) T cell help. We used a physiologic in vivo model to study the requirement of Ag persistence for the cross-priming of minor histocompatibility Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells. We report inefficient cross-priming in situations in which male cells are rapidly cleared. Strikingly, the failure to achieve robust CD8(+) T cell activation is not due to a problem with cross-presentation. In fact, by providing "extra help" in the form of dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with MHC class II peptide, it was possible to achieve robust activation of CD8(+) T cells. Our data suggest that the "licensing" of cross-presenting DCs does not occur during their initial encounter with CD4(+) T cells, thus accounting for the requirement for Ag persistence and suggesting that DCs make multiple interactions with CD8(+) T cells during the priming phase. These findings imply that long-lived Ag is critical for efficient vaccination protocols in which the CD8(+) T cell response is helper-dependent.     

Paternal antigen-bearing cells transferred during insemination do not stimulate anti-paternal CD8+ T cells: role of estradiol in locally inhibiting CD8+ T cell responses

Maternal immunological tolerance of the semiallogeneic fetus involves several overlapping mechanisms to balance maternal immunity and fetal development. Anti-paternal CD8+ T cells are suppressed during pregnancy in some but not all mouse models. Since semen has been shown to mediate immune modulation, we tested whether exposure to paternal Ag during insemination activated or tolerized anti-paternal CD8+ T cells. The uterine lumen of mated female mice contained male MHC I+ cells that stimulated effector, but not naive, CD8+ T cells ex vivo. Maternal MHC class I+ myeloid cells fluxed into the uterine lumen in response to mating and cross-presented male H-Y Ag to effector, but not naive, CD8+ T cells ex vivo. However, neither unprimed nor previously primed TCR-transgenic CD8+ T cells specific for either paternal MHC I or H-Y Ag proliferated in vivo after mating. These T cells subsequently responded normally to i.p. challenge, implicating ignorance rather than anergy as the main reason for the lack of response. CD8+ T cells responded to either peptide Ag or male cells delivered intravaginally in ovariectomized mice, but this response was inhibited by systemic estradiol (inducing an estrus-like state). Subcutaneous Ag induced responses in both cases. Allogeneic dendritic cells did not induce responses intravaginally even in ovariectomized mice in the absence of estradiol. These results suggest that inhibition of antiallogeneic responses is restricted both locally to the reproductive tract and temporally to the estrous phase of the menstrual cycle, potentially decreasing the risk of maternal immunization against paternal Ags during insemination.     

Redundancy of direct priming and cross-priming in tumor-specific CD8+ T cell responses

Against a subset of human cancers, vigorous tumor-specific CD8+ T cell responses can develop either spontaneously or upon allogeneic transplantation. However, the parameters that determine the induction of such pronounced anti-tumor immunity remain ill defined. To dissect the conditions required for the induction of high magnitude T cell responses, we have developed a murine model system in which tumor-specific T cell responses can be monitored directly ex vivo by MHC tetramer technology. In this model, tumor challenge of naive mice with Ag-bearing tumor cells results in a massive Ag-specific T cell response, followed by CD8+ T cell-dependent tumor rejection. We have subsequently used this model to assess the contribution of direct priming and cross-priming in the induction of tumor immunity in a well-defined system. Our results indicate that direct priming of T cells and Ag cross-priming are redundant mechanisms for the induction of tumor-specific T cell immunity. Moreover, T cell responses that arise as a consequence of Ag cross-presentation can occur in the absence of CD4+ T cell help and are remarkably robust.