Structures of the first and second double-stranded RNA-binding domains of human TAR RNA-binding protein

The TAR RNA-binding Protein (TRBP) is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding protein, which binds to Dicer and is required for the RNA interference pathway. TRBP consists of three dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBDs). The first and second dsRBDs (dsRBD1 and dsRBD2, respectively) have affinities for dsRNA, whereas the third dsRBD (dsRBD3) binds to Dicer. In this study, we prepared the single domain fragments of human TRBP corresponding to dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 and solved the crystal structure of dsRBD1 and the solution structure of dsRBD2. The two structures contain an α-β-β-β-α fold, which is common to the dsRBDs. The overall structures of dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 are similar to each other, except for a slight shift of the first α helix. The residues involved in dsRNA binding are conserved. We examined the small interfering RNA (siRNA)-binding properties of these dsRBDs by isothermal titration colorimetry measurements. The dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 fragments both bound to siRNA, with dissociation constants of 220 and 113 nM, respectively. In contrast, the full-length TRBP and its fragment with dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 exhibited much smaller dissociation constants (0.24 and 0.25 nM, respectively), indicating that the tandem dsRBDs bind simultaneously to one siRNA molecule. On the other hand, the loop between the first α helix and the first β strand of dsRBD2, but not dsRBD1, has a Trp residue, which forms hydrophobic and cation-π interactions with the surrounding residues. A circular dichroism analysis revealed that the thermal stability of dsRBD2 is higher than that of dsRBD1 and depends on the Trp residue.     

Inhibitory sequences in the N-terminus of the double-stranded-RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, are important for regulating phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha (eIF2alpha).

During viral infection, phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) by the interferon-induced RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, leads to inhibition of translation initiation and viral proliferation. Activation of PKR is mediated by association of virally encoded double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) with two dsRNA binding domains (dsRBDs) located in the N-terminus of PKR. To better understand the molecular mechanisms regulating PKR, we characterized the activities of wild-type and mutant versions of human PKR expressed and purified from yeast. The catalytic rate of eIF2alpha phosphorylation by our purified PKR was increased in response to dsRNA, but not single-stranded RNA or DNA, consistent with the properties previously described for PKR purified from mammalian sources. While both dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 were required for activation of PKR by dsRNA, only deletion of dsRBD1 severely reduced the basal eIF2alpha kinase activity. Removal of as few as 25 residues at the C-terminal junction of dsRBD2 dramatically increased eIF2alpha kinase activity and characterization of larger deletions that included dsRBD1 demonstrated that removal of these negative-acting sequences could bypass the dsRBD1 requirement for in vitro phosphorylation of eIF2alpha. Heparin, a known in vitro activator of PKR, enhanced eIF2alpha phosphorylation by PKR mutants lacking their entire N-terminal sequences, including the dsRBDs. The results indicate that induction of PKR activity is mediated by multiple mechanisms, one of which involves release of inhibition by negative-acting sequences in PKR.     

Structural insights into RISC assembly facilitated by dsRNA-binding domains of human RNA helicase A (DHX9)

Intensive research interest has focused on small RNA-processing machinery and the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), key cellular machines in RNAi pathways. However, the structural mechanism regarding RISC assembly, the primary step linking small RNA processing and RNA-mediated gene silencing, is largely unknown. Human RNA helicase A (DHX9) was reported to function as an RISC-loading factor, and such function is mediated mainly by its dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBDs). Here, we report the crystal structures of human RNA helicase A (RHA) dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 domains in complex with dsRNAs, respectively. Structural analysis not only reveals higher siRNA duplex-binding affinity displayed by dsRBD1, but also identifies a crystallographic dsRBD1 pair of physiological significance in cooperatively recognizing dsRNAs. Structural observations are further validated by isothermal titration calorimetric (ITC) assay. Moreover, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay coupled with mutagenesis demonstrated that both dsRBDs are required for RISC association, and such association is mediated by dsRNA. Hence, our structural and functional efforts have revealed a potential working model for siRNA recognition by RHA tandem dsRBDs, and together they provide direct structural insights into RISC assembly facilitated by RHA.     

Structure of a yeast RNase III dsRBD complex with a noncanonical RNA substrate provides new insights into binding specificity of dsRBDs

dsRBDs often bind dsRNAs with some specificity, yet the basis for this is poorly understood. Rnt1p, the major RNase III in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cleaves RNA substrates containing hairpins capped by A/uGNN tetraloops, using its dsRBD to recognize a conserved tetraloop fold. However, the identification of a Rnt1p substrate with an AAGU tetraloop raised the question of whether Rnt1p binds to this noncanonical substrate differently than to A/uGNN tetraloops. The solution structure of Rnt1p dsRBD bound to an AAGU-capped hairpin reveals that the tetraloop undergoes a structural rearrangement upon binding to Rnt1p dsRBD to adopt a backbone conformation that is essentially the same as the AGAA tetraloop, and indicates that a conserved recognition mode is used for all Rnt1p substrates. Comparison of free and RNA-bound Rnt1p dsRBD reveals that tetraloop-specific binding requires a conformational change in helix α1. Our findings provide a unified model of binding site selection by this dsRBD.     

The double-stranded RNA-binding protein X1rbpa promotes RNA strand annealing.

RNA-annealing activity is a common feature of several RNA-binding proteins. The Xenopus RNA-binding protein X1rbpa is composed of three tandemly arranged double-stranded RNA-binding domains (dsRBDs) but lacks any other catalytic or functional domains, therefore making the assessment of biological functions of this protein rather difficult. Here we show that full-length X1rbpa but also isolated dsRBDs from this protein can facilitate RNA strand annealing. RNA annealing can be efficiently inhibited by heparin. However, dsRBDs with a neutral pI still promote strand annealing, suggesting that charged residues within the dsRBD are important for strand annealing. Additionally, mutant versions of the dsRBD, unable to bind dsRNA in northwestern assays, were tested. Of these, some show RNA-annealing activity while others fail to do so, indicating that RNA annealing and dsRNA binding are separable functions. Our data, together with the previously reported association of the protein with most cellular RNAs, suggests an RNA chaperone-like function of X1rbpa.     

Specific recognition of HIV TAR RNA by the dsRNA binding domains (dsRBD1-dsRBD2) of PKR

PKR (double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase) is an important component of host defense to virus infection. Binding of dsRNA to two dsRBDs (double-stranded RNA binding domains) of PKR modulates its own kinase activation. How structural features of natural target RNAs, such as bulges and loops, have an effect on the binding to two dsRBDs of PKR still remains unclear. By using ITC and NMR, we show here that both the bulge and loop of TAR RNA are necessary for the high affinity binding to dsRBD1-dsRBD2 of PKR with 1:1 stoichiometry. The binding site for the dsRBD1-dsRBD2 spans from upper bulge to lower stem of the TAR RNA, based on chemical shift mapping. The backbone resonances in the 40 kDa TAR.dsRBD1-dsRBD2 were assigned. NMR chemical shift perturbation data suggest that the beta1-beta2 loop of the dsRBD1 interacts with the TAR RNA, whereas that of the dsRBD2 is less involved in the TAR RNA recognition. In addition, the residues of the interdomain linker between the dsRBD1 and the dsRBD2 also show large chemical perturbations indicating that the linker is involved in the recognition of TAR RNA. The results presented here provide the biophysical and spectroscopic basis for high-resolution structural studies, and show how local RNA structural features modulate recognition by dsRBDs.     

Different activities of the conserved lysine residues in the double-stranded RNA binding domains of RNA helicase A in vitro and in the cell

Background

RNA helicase A regulates a variety of RNA metabolism processes including HIV-1 replication and contains two double-stranded RNA binding domains (dsRBD1 and dsRBD2) at the N-terminus. Each dsRBD contains two invariant lysine residues critical for the binding of isolated dsRBDs to RNA. However, the role of these conserved lysine residues was not tested in the context of enzymatically active full-length RNA helicase A either in vitro or in the cells.

Methods

The conserved lysine residues in each or both of dsRBDs were substituted by alanine in the context of full-length RNA helicase A. The mutant RNA helicase A was purified from mammalian cells. The effects of these mutations were assessed either in vitro upon RNA binding and unwinding or in the cell during HIV-1 production upon RNA helicase A–RNA interaction and RNA helicase A-stimulated viral RNA processes.

Results

Unexpectedly, the substitution of the lysine residues by alanine in either or both of dsRBDs does not prevent purified full-length RNA helicase A from binding and unwinding duplex RNA in vitro. However, these mutations efficiently inhibit RNA helicase A-stimulated HIV-1 RNA metabolism including the accumulation of viral mRNA and tRNA^Lys3 annealing to viral RNA. Furthermore, these mutations do not prevent RNA helicase A from binding to HIV-1 RNA in vitro as well, but dramatically reduce RNA helicase A–HIV-1 RNA interaction in the cells.

Conclusions

The conserved lysine residues of dsRBDs play critical roles in the promotion of HIV-1 production by RNA helicase A.

General significance

The conserved lysine residues of dsRBDs are key to the interaction of RNA helicase A with substrate RNA in the cell, but not in vitro.     

Distinct roles of two conserved Staufen domains in oskar mRNA localization and translation

Drosophila Staufen protein is required for the localization of oskar mRNA to the posterior of the oocyte, the anterior anchoring of bicoid mRNA and the basal localization of prospero mRNA in dividing neuroblasts. The only regions of Staufen that have been conserved throughout animal evolution are five double-stranded (ds)RNA-binding domains (dsRBDs) and a short region within an insertion that splits dsRBD2 into two halves. dsRBDs 1, 3 and 4 bind dsRNA in vitro, but dsRBDs 2 and 5 do not, although dsRBD2 does bind dsRNA when the insertion is removed. Full-length Staufen protein lacking this insertion is able to associate with oskar mRNA and activate its translation, but fails to localize the RNA to the posterior. In contrast, Staufen lacking dsRBD5 localizes oskar mRNA normally, but does not activate its translation. Thus, dsRBD2 is required for the microtubule-dependent localization of osk mRNA, and dsRBD5 for the derepression of oskar mRNA translation, once localized. Since dsRBD5 has been shown to direct the actin-dependent localization of prospero mRNA, distinct domains of Staufen mediate microtubule- and actin-based mRNA transport.     

The Role of Human Dicer-dsRBD in Processing Small Regulatory RNAs

One of the most exciting recent developments in RNA biology has been the discovery of small non-coding RNAs that affect gene expression through the RNA interference (RNAi) mechanism. Two major classes of RNAs involved in RNAi are small interfering RNA (siRNA) and microRNA (miRNA). Dicer, an RNase III enzyme, plays a central role in the RNAi pathway by cleaving precursors of both of these classes of RNAs to form mature siRNAs and miRNAs, which are then loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). miRNA and siRNA precursors are quite structurally distinct; miRNA precursors are short, imperfect hairpins while siRNA precursors are long, perfect duplexes. Nonetheless, Dicer is able to process both. Dicer, like the majority of RNase III enzymes, contains a dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD), but the data are sparse on the exact role this domain plays in the mechanism of Dicer binding and cleavage. To further explore the role of human Dicer-dsRBD in the RNAi pathway, we determined its binding affinity to various RNAs modeling both miRNA and siRNA precursors. Our study shows that Dicer-dsRBD is an avid binder of dsRNA, but its binding is only minimally influenced by a single-stranded – double-stranded junction caused by large terminal loops observed in miRNA precursors. Thus, the Dicer-dsRBD contributes directly to substrate binding but not to the mechanism of differentiating between pre-miRNA and pre-siRNA. In addition, NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations provide an overview of the role that dynamics contribute to the binding mechanism. We compare this current study with our previous studies of the dsRBDs from Drosha and DGCR8 to give a dynamic profile of dsRBDs in their apo-state and a mechanistic view of dsRNA binding by dsRBDs in general.     

Deformability in the cleavage site of primary microRNA is not sensed by the double‐stranded RNA binding domains in the microprocessor component DGCR8

The prevalence of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) in eukaryotic cells has only recently been appreciated. Of interest here, RNA silencing begins with dsRNA substrates that are bound by the dsRNA‐binding domains (dsRBDs) of their processing proteins. Specifically, processing of microRNA (miRNA) in the nucleus minimally requires the enzyme Drosha and its dsRBD‐containing cofactor protein, DGCR8. The smallest recombinant construct of DGCR8 that is sufficient for in vitro dsRNA binding, referred to as DGCR8‐Core, consists of its two dsRBDs and a C‐terminal tail. As dsRBDs rarely recognize the nucleotide sequence of dsRNA, it is reasonable to hypothesize that DGCR8 function is dependent on the recognition of specific structural features in the miRNA precursor. Previously, we demonstrated that noncanonical structural elements that promote RNA flexibility within the stem of miRNA precursors are necessary for efficient in vitro cleavage by reconstituted Microprocessor complexes. Here, we combine gel shift assays with in vitro processing assays to demonstrate that neither the N‐terminal dsRBD of DGCR8 in isolation nor the DGCR8‐Core construct is sensitive to the presence of noncanonical structural elements within the stem of miRNA precursors, or to single‐stranded segments flanking the stem. Extending DGCR8‐Core to include an N‐terminal heme‐binding region does not change our conclusions. Thus, our data suggest that although the DGCR8‐Core region is necessary for dsRNA binding and recruitment to the Microprocessor, it is not sufficient to establish the previously observed connection between RNA flexibility and processing efficiency. Proteins 2015; 83:1165–1179. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Solution structure of the N-terminal dsRBD of Drosophila ADAR and interaction studies with RNA

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR) catalyze adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) editing in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates. Inosine is read as guanosine by the translation machinery; therefore A-to-I editing events in coding sequences may result in recoding genetic information. Whereas vertebrates have two catalytically active enzymes, namely ADAR1 and ADAR2, Drosophila has a single ADAR protein (dADAR) related to ADAR2. The structural determinants controlling substrate recognition and editing of a specific adenosine within dsRNA substrates are only partially understood. Here, we report the solution structure of the N-terminal dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD) of dADAR and use NMR chemical shift perturbations to identify the protein surface involved in RNA binding. Additionally, we show that Drosophila ADAR edits the R/G site in the mammalian GluR-2 pre-mRNA which is naturally modified by both ADAR1 and ADAR2. We then constructed a model showing how dADAR dsRBD1 binds to the GluR-2 R/G stem-loop. This model revealed that most side chains interacting with the RNA sugar-phosphate backbone need only small displacement to adapt for dsRNA binding and are thus ready to bind to their dsRNA target. It also predicts that dADAR dsRBD1 would bind to dsRNA with less sequence specificity than dsRBDs of ADAR2. Altogether, this study gives new insights into dsRNA substrate recognition by Drosophila ADAR.     

Dynamic origins of differential RNA binding function in two dsRBDs from the miRNA "microprocessor" complex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) affect gene regulation by base pairing with mRNA and contribute to the control of cellular homeostasis. The first step in miRNA maturation is conducted in the nucleus by the "microprocessor" complex made up of an RNase III enzyme, Drosha, that contains one dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD), and DGCR8, that contains two dsRBDs in tandem. The crystal structure of DGCR8-Core (493-720), containing both dsRBDs, and the NMR solution structure of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) have been reported, but the solution dynamics have not been explored for any of these dsRBDs. To better define the mechanism of dsRNA binding and thus the nuclear maturation step of miRNA processing, we report NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) and DGCR8-dsRBD1 (505-583). The study was motivated by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) of the two dsRBDs, which showed that Drosha-dsRBD does not bind a representative miRNA but isolated DGCR8-dsRBD1 does (K(d) = 9.4 ± 0.4 μM). Our results show that loop 2 in both dsRBDs is highly dynamic but the pattern of the correlations observed in MD is different for the two proteins. Additionally, the extended loop 1 of Drosha-dsRBD is more flexible than the corresponding loop in DGCR8-dsRBD1 but shows no correlation with loop 2, which potentially explains the lack of dsRNA binding by Drosha-dsRBD in the absence of the RNase III domains. The results presented in this study provide key structural and dynamic features of dsRBDs that contribute to the binding mechanism of these domains to dsRNA.     

Molecular dynamics simulation of the RNA complex of a double-stranded RNA-binding domain reveals dynamic features of the intermolecular interface and its hydration

The interaction between double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and the third double-stranded domain (dsRBD) from Drosophila Staufen protein represents a paradigm to understand how the dsRBD protein family, one of the most common RNA-binding protein units, binds dsRNA. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of this complex and the x-ray structure of another family member revealed the stereochemical basis for recognition, but also raised new questions. Although the crystallographic studies revealed a highly ordered interface containing numerous water-mediated contacts, NMR suggested extensive residual motion at the interface. To address how interfacial motion contributes to molecular recognition in the dsRBD-dsRNA system, we conducted a 2-ns molecular dynamics simulation of the complex derived from Staufen protein and of the separate protein and RNA components. The results support the observation that a high degree of conformational flexibility is retained upon complex formation and that this involves interfacial residues that are critical for dsRBD-dsRNA binding. The structural origin of this residual flexibility is revealed by the analysis of the trajectory of motion. Individual basic side chains switch continuously from one RNA polar group to another with a residence time seldom exceeding 100 ps, while retaining favorable interaction with RNA throughout much of the simulation. Short-lived water molecules mediate some of these interactions for a large fraction of the trajectory studied here. This result indicates that water molecules are not statically associated with the interface, but continuously exchange with the bulk solvent on a 1-10-ps time scale. This work provides new insight into dsRBD-dsRNA recognition and builds upon a growing body of evidence, suggesting that short-lived dynamic interactions play important roles in protein-nucleic acid interactions.     

RNA aptamers binding the double-stranded RNA-binding domain

Specific RNA recognition of proteins containing the double-strand RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) is essential for several biological pathways such as ADAR-mediated adenosine deamination, localization of RNAs by Staufen, or RNA cleavage by RNAse III. Structural analysis has demonstrated the lack of base-specific interactions of dsRBDs with either a perfect RNA duplex or an RNA hairpin. We therefore asked whether in vitro selections performed in parallel with individual dsRBDs could yield RNAs that are specifically recognized by the dsRBD on which they were selected . To this end, SELEX experiments were performed using either the second dsRBD of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 or the second dsRBD of Xlrbpa, a homolog of TRBP that is involved in RISC formation. Several RNA families with high binding capacities for dsRBDs were isolated from either SELEX experiment, but no discrimination of these RNAs by different dsRBDs could be detected. The selected RNAs are highly structured, and binding regions map to two neighboring stem-loops that presumably form stacked helices and are interrupted by mismatches and bulges. Despite the lack of selective binding of SELEX RNAs to individual dsRBDS, selected RNAs can efficiently interfere with RNA editing in vivo.     

Analysis of a binding difference between the two dsRNA-binding domains in TRBP reveals the modular function of a KR-helix motif.

Double-stranded RNA-binding proteins constitute a large family with conserved domains called dsRBDs. One of these, TRBP, a protein that binds HIV-1 TAR RNA, has two dsRBDs (dsRBD1 and dsRBD2), as indicated by computer sequence homology. However, a 24-amino-acid deletion in dsRBD2 completely abolishes RNA binding, suggesting that only one domain is functional. To analyse further the similarities and differences between these domains, we expressed them independently and measured their RNA-binding affinities. We found that dsRBD2 has a dissociation constant of 5.9 x 10-8 M, whereas dsRBD1 binds RNA minimally. Binding analysis of 25-amino-acid peptides in TRBP and other related proteins showed that only one peptide in TRBP and one in Drosophila Staufen bind TAR and a GC-rich TAR-mimic RNA. Whereas a 25-mer peptide derived from dsRBD2 (TR5) bound TAR RNA, the equivalent peptide in dsRBD1 (TR6) did not. Molecular modelling indicates that this difference can mainly be ascribed to the replacement of Arg by His residues. Mutational analyses in homologous peptides also show the importance of residues K2 and L3. Analysis of 15-amino-acid peptides revealed that, in addition to TR13 (from TRBP dsRBD2), one peptide in S6 kinase has RNA-binding properties. On the basis of previous and the present results, we can define, in a broader context than that of TRBP, the main outlines of a modular KR-helix motif required for binding TAR. This structural motif exists independently from the dsRBD context and therefore has a modular function.     

Mechanism of interaction of the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding domain of protein kinase R with short dsRNA sequences

The dsRNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) plays a major role in the cellular response to viral infection. PKR contains an N-terminal dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD) and a C-terminal kinase domain. The dsRBD consists of two tandem copies of a conserved double-stranded RNA binding motif, dsRBM1 and dsRBM2. dsRNA binding is believed to activate PKR by inducing dimerization and subsequent autophosphorylation reactions. We have characterized the function of the dsRBD by assessing the binding of dsRBM1 and dsRBD to a series of dsRNA sequences ranging from 15 to 45 bp. For dsRBM1, the binding stoichiometries agree with an overlapping ligand binding model where the motif binds to multiple faces of the dsRNA duplex and overlaps along the helical axis. Similar behavior is observed for a dsRBD containing both dsRBM1 and dsRBM2 for sequences up to 30 bp; however, the binding affinity is enhanced 30-fold. Longer dsRNA sequences exhibit lower-than-expected stoichiometries, indicating a change in binding mode. NMR spectroscopy was used to define the regions of the dsRBD that interact with dsRNA. dsRNA binding induces exchange broadening of cross-peaks in 1H-15N HSQC spectra. For a 20 bp dsRNA, the resonances most affected map to the known dsRNA binding regions of dsRBM1 as well as the N-terminus of dsRBM2. For a longer 40 bp sequence, additional regions of dsRBM2 exhibit enhanced broadening. These data support a model in which dsRBM1 plays the dominant role in binding short dsRNA sequences and dsRBM2 makes additional interactions with the longer sequences capable of activating PKR.