Berberine attenuates XRCC1‐mediated base excision repair and sensitizes breast cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic drugs

Berberine (BBR) is a natural isoquinoline alkaloid, which is used in traditional medicine for its anti‐microbial, anti‐protozoal, anti‐diarrhoeal activities. Berberine interacts with DNA and displays anti‐cancer activities, yet its effects on cellular DNA repair and on synthetic treatments with chemotherapeutic drugs remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of BBR on DNA repair and on sensitization of breast cancer cells to different types of DNA damage anti‐tumoural drugs. We found BBR arrested cells in the cell cycle S phase and induced DNA breaks. Cell growth analysis showed BBR sensitized MDA‐MB‐231 cells to cisplatin, camptothecin and methyl methanesulfonate; however, BBR had no synergistic effects with hydroxurea and olaparib. These results suggest BBR only affects specific DNA repair pathways. Western blot showed BBR down‐regulated XRCC1 expressions, and the rescued XRCC1 recovered the resistance of cancer cells to BBR. Therefore, we conclude that BBR interferes with XRCC1‐mediated base excision repair to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. These finding can contribute to understanding the effects of BBR on cellular DNA repair and the clinical employment of BBR in treatment of breast cancer.     

Impaired DNA double-strand breaks repair by kinesin family member 4A inhibition renders human H1299 non-small-cell lung cancer cells sensitive to cisplatin

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are routinely treated with the platinum-based chemotherapeutics such as cisplatin. The drug exerts anticancer effects via multiple mechanisms, including DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Enhanced DNA DSB repair capacity would be associated with innate or acquired drug resistance. However, despite strong evidence for the role of the chromokinesin kinesin family member 4A (KIF4A) in DSB repair, the relationship between the chromokinesin and cisplatin sensitivity of human NSCLC cells remains unknown. Furthermore, little is known regarding the effect of targeting KIF4A on the function of DSB repair-related proteins in these cells. In the current study, we demonstrated that cisplatin treatment stimulated the expression of KIF4A protein in human NSCLC cells. Depletion of KIF4A by small interfering RNA significantly enhanced cisplatin-induced cell cycle arrest in S and G2/M phases and cytotoxicity in human NSCLC cells. Furthermore, we found that KIF4A inhibition suppressed the ability of cisplatin to induce BRCA2 and Rad51 focus formation and limits the further increase in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 activity induced by cisplatin treatment in human NSCLC cells. These studies thus identify the chromokinesin KIF4A as a novel modulator of cisplatin sensitivity that is significantly enhanced by the chromokinesin in human NSCLC cells via multiple mechanisms.     

Inhibition of PARP1 activity enhances chemotherapeutic efficiency in cisplatin-resistant gastric cancer cells

Cisplatin (DDP) is the first line chemotherapeutic drug for several cancers, including gastric cancer (GC). Unfortunately, the rapid development of drug resistance remains a significant challenge for the clinical application of cisplatin. There is an urgent need to develop new strategies to overcome DDP resistance for cancer treatment. In this study, four types of human GC cells have been divided into naturally sensitive or naturally resistant categories according to their responses to cisplatin. PARP1 activity (poly (ADP-ribose), PAR) was found to be greatly increased in cisplatin-resistant GC cells. PARP1 inhibitors significantly enhanced cisplatin-induced DNA damage and apoptosis in the resistant GC cells via the inhibition of PAR. Mechanistically, PARP1 inhibitors suppress DNA-PKcs stability and reduce the capability of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair via the NHEJ pathway. This was also verified in BGC823/DDP GC cells with acquired cisplatin resistance. In conclusion, we identified that PARP1 is a useful interceptive target in cisplatin-resistant GC cells. Our data provide a promising therapeutic strategy against cisplatin resistance in GC cells that has potential translational significance.     

Understanding cisplatin resistance using cellular models

Many mechanisms of cisplatin resistance have been proposed from studies of cellular models of resistance including changes in cellular drug accumulation, detoxification of the drug, inhibition of apoptosis and repair of the DNA adducts. A series of resistant models were developed from CCRF-CEM leukaemia cells with increasing doses of cisplatin from 100 ng/ml. This produced increasing resistance up to 7-fold with a treatment dose of 1.6 microg/ml. Cisplatin resistance in these cells correlated with increases in the antioxidant glutathione, yet treatment with buthionine sulphoximine, an inhibitor of glutathione synthesis, had no effect on resistance, suggesting that the increase in glutathione was not directly involved in cisplatin resistance. Two models were developed from H69 SCLC cells, H69-CP and H69CIS200 using 100 ng/ml or 200 ng/ml cisplatin respectively. Both cell models were 2-4 fold resistant to cisplatin, and have decreased expression of p21 which may increase the cell's ability to progress through the cell cycle in the presence of DNA damage. Both the H69-CP and H69CIS200 cells showed no decrease in cellular cisplatin accumulation. However, the H69-CP cells have increased levels of cellular glutathione and are cross resistant to radiation whereas the H69CIS200 cells have neither of these changes. This suggests that increases in glutathione may contribute to cross-resistance to other drugs and radiation, but not directly to cisplatin resistance. There are multiple resistance mechanisms induced by cisplatin treatment, even in the same cell type. How then should cisplatin-resistant cancers be treated? Cisplatin-resistant cell lines are often more sensitive to another chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel (H69CIS200), or are able to be sensitized to cisplatin with paclitaxel pre-treatment (H69-CP). The understanding of this sensitization by paclitaxel using cell models of cisplatin resistance will lead to improvements in the clinical treatment of cisplatin resistant tumours.     

TXNL1-XRCC1 pathway regulates cisplatin-induced cell death and contributes to resistance in human gastric cancer

Cisplatin is a cytotoxic platinum compound that triggers DNA crosslinking induced cell death, and is one of the reference drugs used in the treatment of several types of human cancers including gastric cancer. However, intrinsic or acquired drug resistance to cisplatin is very common, and leading to treatment failure. We have recently shown that reduced expression of base excision repair protein XRCC1 (X-ray repair cross complementing group1) in gastric cancerous tissues correlates with a significant survival benefit from adjuvant first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we demonstrated the role of XRCC1 in repair of cisplatin-induced DNA lesions and acquired cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer by using cisplatin-sensitive gastric cancer cell lines BGC823 and the cisplatin-resistant gastric cancer cell lines BGC823/cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II) (DDP). Our results indicated that the protein expression of XRCC1 was significantly increased in cisplatin-resistant cells and independently contributed to cisplatin resistance. Irinotecan, another chemotherapeutic agent to induce DNA damaging used to treat patients with advanced gastric cancer that progressed on cisplatin, was found to inhibit the expression of XRCC1 effectively, and leading to an increase in the sensitivity of resistant cells to cisplatin. Our proteomic studies further identified a cofactor of 26S proteasome, the thioredoxin-like protein 1 (TXNL1) that downregulated XRCC1 in BGC823/DDP cells via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In conclusion, the TXNL1-XRCC1 is a novel regulatory pathway that has an independent role in cisplatin resistance, indicating a putative drug target for reversing cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer.     

Gatifloxacin Induces S and G2-Phase Cell Cycle Arrest in Pancreatic Cancer Cells via p21/p27/p53

Pancreatic cancer, despite being the most dreadful among gastrointestinal cancers, is poorly diagnosed, and further, the situation has been aggravated owing to acquired drug resistance against the single known drug therapy. While previous studies have highlighted the growth inhibitory effects of older generation fluoroquinolones, the current study aims to evaluate the growth inhibitory effects of newer generation fluoroquinolone, Gatifloxacin, on pancreatic cancer cell lines MIA PaCa-2 and Panc-1 as well as to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. Herein, we report that Gatifloxacin suppresses the proliferation of MIA PaCa-2 and Panc-1 cells by causing S and G₂-phase cell cycle arrest without induction of apoptosis. Blockade in S-phase of the cell cycle was associated with increased TGF-β1 expression and translocation of Smad3-4 complex to the nucleus with subsequent activation of p21 in MIA PaCa-2 cells, whereas TGF-β signalling attenuated Panc-1 cells showed S-phase arrest by direct activation of p27. However, Gatifloxacin mediated G₂–phase cell cycle arrest was found to be p53 dependent in both the cell lines. Our study is of interest because fluoroquinolones have the ability to penetrate pancreatic tissue which can be very effective in combating pancreatic cancers that are usually associated with loss or downregulation of CDK inhibitors p21/p27 as well as mutational inactivation of p53. Additionally, Gatifloxacin was also found to synergize the effect of Gemcitabine, the only known drug against pancreatic cancer, as well as the broad spectrum anticancer drug cisplatin. Taken together our results suggest that Gatifloxacin possesses anticancer activities against pancreatic cancer and is a promising candidate to be repositioned from broad spectrum antibiotics to anticancer agent.     

RDM1 promotes critical processes in breast cancer tumorigenesis

Breast cancer is currently among the most common cancers in women, with almost 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Dysregulation of DNA repair pathways allows cells to accumulate damage and eventually mutations, with a subsequent reduction in DNA repair capacity in breast tissue, leading to tumorigenesis. One component of the DNA damage repair pathway is RAD52 motif‐containing 1 (RDM1), but the specific role of RDM1 in breast cancer and the underlying mechanism remain unclear. Here, we examined the role played by RDM1 in breast cancer cell culture using the HBL100 and MCF‐7 breast cancer cell lines. Disruption of RDM1 reduced in vitro cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. Knockdown of RDM1 also induced up‐regulation of p53 levels, whereas RAD51 and RAD52, both involved in DNA repair, were down‐regulated. In addition, the in vivo growth of RDM1‐deficient cells was significantly repressed, suggesting that RDM1 is a novel oncogenic protein in human breast cancer cells. This study reveals a link between the DNA damage response pathway and oncogenic functionality in breast cancer. Accordingly, therapeutic targeting of RDM1 is a potential treatment strategy for breast cancer and overcoming drug resistance.     

Cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells is involved with GPR30-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Cisplatin is the major chemotherapeutic drug in gastric cancer, particularly in treating advanced gastric cancer. Tumour cells often develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, which seriously affects the efficacy of chemotherapy. GPR30 is a novel oestrogen receptor that is involved in the invasion, metastasis and drug resistance of many tumours. Targeting GPR30 has been shown to increase the drug sensitivity of breast cancer cells. However, few studies have investigated the role of GPR30 in gastric cancer. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been shown to be associated with the development of chemotherapeutic drug resistance. In this study, we demonstrated that GPR30 is involved in cisplatin resistance by promoting EMT in gastric cancer. GPR30 knockdown resulted in increased sensitivity of different gastric cancer (GC) cells to cisplatin and alterations in the epithelial/mesenchymal markers. Furthermore, G15 significantly enhanced the cisplatin sensitivity of GC cells while G1 inhibited this phenomenon. In addition, EMT occurred when AGS and BGC-823 were treated with cisplatin. Down-regulation of GPR30 with G15 inhibited this transformation, while G1 promoted it. Taken together, these results revealed the role of GPR30 in the formation of cisplatin resistance, suggesting that targeting GPR30 signalling may be a potential strategy for improving the efficacy of chemotherapy in gastric cancer.     

Screening for modulators of cisplatin sensitivity: Unbiased screens reveal common themes

Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent to treat a variety of solid tumors. The cytotoxic mode of action of cisplatin is mediated by inducing conformational changes in DNA including intra- and inter-strand crosslink adducts. Recognition of these adducts results in the activation of the DNA damage response resulting in cell cycle arrest, repair, and potentially, apoptosis. Despite the clinical efficacy of cisplatin, many tumors are either intrinsically resistant or acquire resistance during treatment. The identification of cisplatin drug response modulators can help us understand these resistance mechanisms, provide biomarkers for treatment strategies, or provide drug targets for combination therapy. Here we discuss functional genetic screens, including one performed by us, set up to identify genes whose inhibition results in increased sensitivity to cisplatin. In summary, the validated genes identified in these screens mainly operate in DNA damage response including nucleotide excision repair, translesion synthesis, and homologous recombination.     

Two 4N Cell-Cycle Arrests Contribute to Cisplatin-Resistance

Cisplatin is a platinum-based drug that is used for the treatment of a wide-variety of primary human cancers. However, the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin is often limited by intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. An important goal, therefore, is to identify mechanisms that lead to cisplatin resistance in cancer, and then use this information to more effectively target resistant cells. Cisplatin-resistant clones of the HCT116 cell line underwent a prolonged G2 arrest after cisplatin treatment while sensitive clones did not. The staurosporine analog UCN-01 abrogated this G2 arrest and sensitized the resistant clones to cisplatin. At later time points, 4N arrested cells assumed a tetraploid G1 state that was characterized by depletion of Cyclin A, Cyclin B, and CDC2, and increased expression of p53 and p21, in 4N cells. siRNA-mediated knockdown of p21 abrogated the tetraploid G1 arrest and induced killing that was dependent on p53. The results identify two targetable 4N arrests that can contribute to cisplatin resistance: First, a prolonged G2 arrest that can be targeted by UCN-01, and second, a tetraploid G1 arrest that can be targeted by siRNA against p21.     

Recombinant adenovirus-mediated p14(ARF) overexpression sensitizes human breast cancer cells to cisplatin

p14(ARF), the alternative product from the human INK4a/ARF locus, is one of the major targets for alterations in the development of human cancers. Overexpression of p14(ARF) results in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. To examine the potential therapeutic role of re-expressing p14(ARF) gene product in human breast cancer, a recombinant adenovirus expressing the human p14(ARF) cDNA (Adp14(ARF)) was constructed and used to infect breast cancer cells. Five days after infection, Adp14(ARF) had considerable cytotoxicity on p53-wild-type MCF-7 cells. A time-course study showed that Adp14(ARF) infection of MCF-7 cells at 100pfu/cell increased the number of cells in G0/G1 phase and decreased that in S and G2/M phases. The presence of apoptotic cells was confirmed using the TUNEL assay. Adp14(ARF)-mediated expression of p14(ARF) also resulted in a considerable increase in the amounts of p53 and its target proteins, p21(WAF1) and MDM2. Furthermore, the combination treatment of MCF-7 cells with Adp14(ARF) and cisplatin resulted in a significantly greater cell death. Together, we conclude that p14(ARF) plays an important role in the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells and recombinant adenovirus-mediated p14(ARF) expression greatly increases the sensitivity of these cells to cisplatin. These results demonstrate that the proper combination of Adp14(ARF) with conventional chemotherapeutic drug(s) could have potential benefits in treating breast cancer that carries wild-type p53 gene.     

Demethylating agent 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine enhances susceptibility of breast cancer cells to anticancer agents

DNA methylation plays an important role in regulation of gene expression and is increasingly being recognized as a determinant of chemosensitivity of human cancers. With the aim of improving the chemotherapeutic efficacy of breast carcinoma, the effect of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR), on the chemosensitivity of anticancer drugs was investigated. The cytotoxicity of paclitaxel (PTX), adriamycin (ADR), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was analyzed against human breast cancer cell lines, MDA MB 231 and MCF 7 cell lines using the MTT assay, and the synergy of 5-aza-CdR and these agents was determined by Drewinko’s fraction method. The effects of each single agent or the combined treatment on cell cycle arrest were analyzed by flow cytometric analysis. We also investigated the effect of each single agent or the combined treatment of anticancer drugs with 5-aza-CdR on the methylation status of the selected genes by methylation specific PCR. In MDA MB 231 cells, a synergistic antiproliferative effect was observed with a combination of 10 μM 5-aza-CdR and these three anticancer drugs, while in MCF 7 cells, a semiadditive effect was observed. Treatment with 5-aza-CdR and anticancer drug resulted in partial demethylation of a panel of genes including RARβ2, Slit2, GSTP1, and MGMT. Based on these findings, we propose that 5-aza-CdR enhances the chemosensitivity of anticancer drugs in breast cancer cells and may be a promising approach for increasing the chemotherapeutic potential of these anticancer agents for more effective management of breast carcinomas.     

Proteasome inhibition prevents cell death induced by the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin downstream of DNA damage

Cisplatin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic drug acting as a DNA-damaging agent that induces apoptosis of rapidly proliferating cells. Unfortunately, cellular resistance still occurs. Mutations in p53 in a large fraction of tumor cells contribute to defects in apoptotic pathways and drug resistance. To uncover new strategies to eliminate tumors through a p53-independent pathway, we established a simplified model devoid of p53 to study cisplatin-induced regulated cell death, using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We previously showed that cisplatin induces an active form of cell death accompanied by DNA condensation and fragmentation/degradation, but no significant mitochondrial dysfunction. We further demonstrated that proteasome inhibition, either with MG132 or genetically, increased resistance to cisplatin. In this study, we sought to determine how proteasome inhibition is important for cisplatin resistance by analyzing how it affects several phenotypes associated with the DNA damage response. We found MG132 does not seem to affect the activation of the DNA damage response or increase damage tolerance. Moreover, central modulators of the DNA damage response are not required for cisplatin resistance imparted by MG132. These results suggest the proteasome is involved in modulation of cisplatin toxicity downstream of DNA damage. Proteasome inhibitors can sensitize tumor cells to cisplatin, but protect others from cisplatin-induced cell death. Elucidation of this mechanism will therefore aid in the development of new strategies to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy.     

NSC109268 potentiates cisplatin-induced cell death in a p53-independent manner

Background

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. Cisplatin is one of the most effective anticancer drugs used in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Development of resistance to cisplatin limits its therapeutic use. Most of the anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, are believed to kill cancer cells by inducing apoptosis and a defect in apoptotic signaling can contribute to drug resistance. The tumor suppressor protein p53 plays a critical role in DNA damage-induced apoptosis. During a yeast-based drug screening, NSC109268 was identified to enhance cellular sensitivity to cisplatin. The objective of the present study is to determine if p53 is responsible for cisplatin sensitization by NSC109268.

Results

NSC109268 enhanced sensitivity of ovarian cancer 2008 cells and its cisplatin resistant counterpart 2008/C13* cells which express wild-type p53. The potentiation of cisplatin sensitivity by NSC109268 was greater in 2008/C13* cells compared to 2008 cells. Cisplatin caused a concentration-dependent increase in p53 in 2008 and 2008/C13* cells, and the induction of p53 correlated with cisplatin-induced apoptosis as determined by the cleavage of PARP. NSC109268 alone had no effect on p53 but it enhanced p53 level in response to cisplatin. Knockdown of p53 by siRNA, however, did not attenuate cell death in response to cisplatin or combination of NSC109268 and cisplatin.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that NSC109268 enhances sensitivity of ovarian cancer 2008 cells to cisplatin independent of p53.     

Inhibition of ERβ induces resistance to cisplatin by enhancing Rad51-mediated DNA repair in human medulloblastoma cell lines

Cisplatin is one of the most widely used and effective anticancer drugs against solid tumors including cerebellar tumor of the childhood, Medulloblastoma. However, cancer cells often develop resistance to cisplatin, which limits therapeutic effectiveness of this otherwise effective genotoxic drug. In this study, we demonstrate that human medulloblastoma cell lines develop acute resistance to cisplatin in the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, ICI182,780. This unexpected finding involves a switch from the G2/M to G1 checkpoint accompanied by decrease in ATM/Chk2 and increase in ATR/Chk1 phosphorylation. We have previously reported that ERβ, which is highly expressed in medulloblastomas, translocates insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) to the nucleus, and that nuclear IRS-1 binds to Rad51 and attenuates homologous recombination directed DNA repair (HRR). Here, we demonstrate that in the presence of ICI182,780, cisplatin-treated medulloblastoma cells show recruitment of Rad51 to the sites of damaged DNA and increase in HRR activity. This enhanced DNA repair during the S phase preserved also clonogenic potential of medulloblastoma cells treated with cisplatin. In conclusion, inhibition of ERβ considered as a supplemental anticancer therapy, has been found to interfere with cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human medulloblastoma cell lines.     

Ouabain,a Cardiac Glycoside,Inhibits the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA Pathway Activated by DNA Interstrand Cross-Linking Agents

Modulation of the DNA repair pathway is an emerging target for the development of anticancer drugs. DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs), one of the most severe forms of DNA damage caused by anticancer drugs such as cisplatin and mitomycin C (MMC), activates the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA DNA repair pathway. Inhibition of the FA/BRCA pathway can enhance the cytotoxic effects of ICL-inducing anticancer drugs and can reduce anticancer drug resistance. To find FA/BRCA pathway inhibitory small molecules, we established a cell-based high-content screening method for quantitating the activation of the FA/BRCA pathway by measuring FANCD2 foci on DNA lesions and then applied our method to chemical screening. Using commercial LOPAC1280 chemical library screening, ouabain was identified as a competent FA/BRCA pathway inhibitory compound. Ouabain, a member of the cardiac glycoside family, binds to and inhibits Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase and has been used to treat heart disease for many years. We observed that ouabain, as well as other cardiac glycoside family members―digitoxin and digoxin―down-regulated FANCD2 and FANCI mRNA levels, reduced monoubiquitination of FANCD2, inhibited FANCD2 foci formation on DNA lesions, and abrogated cell cycle arrest induced by MMC treatment. These inhibitory activities of ouabain required p38 MAPK and were independent of cellular Ca²⁺ ion increase or the drug uptake-inhibition effect of ouabain. Furthermore, we found that ouabain potentiated the cytotoxic effects of MMC in tumor cells. Taken together, we identified an additional effect of ouabain as a FA/BRCA pathway-inhibiting chemosensitization compound. The results of this study suggest that ouabain may serve as a chemosensitizer to ICL-inducing anticancer drugs.