Vectorial activation of smooth muscle myosin filaments and its modulation by telokin

Smooth muscle myosin copurifies with myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and calmodulin (CaM) as well as with variable amounts of myosin phosphatase. Therefore, myosin filaments formed in vitro also contain relatively high levels of these enzymes. Thus these filaments may be considered to be native-like because they are similar to those expected to exist in vivo. These endogenous enzymes are present at high concentrations relative to myosin, sufficient for rapid phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the filaments at rates comparable to those observed for contraction and relaxation in intact muscle strips. The phosphorylation by MLCK/CaM complex appears to exhibit some directionality and is not governed by a random diffusional process. For the mixtures of myosin filaments with and without the endogenous MLCK/CaM complex, the complex preferentially phosphorylates its own parent filament at a higher rate than the neighboring filaments. This selective or vectorial-like activation is lost or absent when myosin filaments are dissolved at high ionic strength. Similar vectorial-like activation is exhibited by the reconstituted filament suspensions, but the soluble systems composed of isolated regulatory light chain or soluble myosin head subfragments exhibit normal diffusional kinetic behavior. At physiological concentrations, kinase related protein (telokin) effectively modulates the activation process by reducing the phosphorylation rate of the filaments without affecting the overall phosphorylation level. This results from telokin-induced liberation of the active MLCK/CaM complex from the filaments, so that the latter can also activate the neighboring filaments via a slower diffusional process. When this complex is bound at insufficient levels, this actually results in acceleration of the initial phosphorylation rates. In short, I suggest that in smooth muscle, telokin plays a chaperone role for myosin and its filaments.     

Functional properties and intracellular localization of high molecular weight isoforms of ligh chain myosin kinase

The vertebrate genetic locus, coding for a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent enzyme myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), the key regulator of smooth muscle contraction and cell motility, reveals a complex organization. Two MLCK isoforms are encoded by the MLCK genetic locus. Recently identified M(r) 210 kDa MLCK contains a sequence of smooth muscle/non-muscle M(r) 108 kDa MLCK and has an additional N-terminal sequence (Watterson et al., 1995. FEBS Lett. 373 : 217). A gene for an independently expressed non-kinase product KRP (telokin) is located within the MLCK gene (Collinge et al., 1992. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 : 2359). KRP binds to and regulates the structure of myosin filaments (Shirinsky et al., 1993. J. Biol. Chem. 268 : 16578). Here we compared biochemical properties of MLCK-210 and MLCK-108 and studied intracellular localization of MLCK-210. MLCK-210 was isolated from extract of chicken aorta by immunoprecipitation using specific antibody and biochemically analysed in vitro. MLCK-210 phosphorylated myosin regulatory light chain and heavy meromyosin. The Ca(2+)-dependence and specific activity of MLCK-210 were similar to that of MLCK-108 from turkey gizzard. Using sedimentation assay we demonstrated that MLCK-210 as well as MLCK-108 binds to both actin and myosin filaments. MLCK-210 was localized in smooth muscle cell layers of aortic wall and was found to co-localize with microfilaments in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells.     

AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylates and desensitizes smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase

Smooth muscle contraction is initiated by a rise in intracellular calcium, leading to activation of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) via calcium/calmodulin (CaM). Activated MLCK then phosphorylates the regulatory myosin light chains, triggering cross-bridge cycling and contraction. Here, we show that MLCK is a substrate of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). The phosphorylation site in chicken MLCK was identified by mass spectrometry to be located in the CaM-binding domain at Ser(815). Phosphorylation by AMPK desensitized MLCK by increasing the concentration of CaM required for half-maximal activation. In primary cultures of rat aortic smooth muscle cells, vasoconstrictors activated AMPK in a calcium-dependent manner via CaM-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta, a known upstream kinase of AMPK. Indeed, vasoconstrictor-induced AMPK activation was abrogated by the STO-609 CaM-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta inhibitor. Myosin light chain phosphorylation was increased under these conditions, suggesting that contraction would be potentiated by ablation of AMPK. Indeed, in aortic rings from mice in which alpha1, the major catalytic subunit isoform in arterial smooth muscle, had been deleted, KCl- or phenylephrine-induced contraction was increased. The findings suggest that AMPK attenuates contraction by phosphorylating and inactivating MLCK. This might contribute to reduced ATP turnover in the tonic phase of smooth muscle contraction.     

The carboxyl terminus of the smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is expressed as an independent protein, telokin.

It has been proposed that the carboxyl terminus of the smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is expressed as an independent protein. This protein has been purified from tissues and named telokin (Ito, M., Dabrowska, R., Guerriero, V., Jr., and Hartshorne, D. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13971-13974). In this study we have isolated and characterized cDNA and genomic clones encoding telokin. Analysis of a genomic DNA clone suggests that the mRNA encoding telokin arises from a promoter which appears to be located within an intron of the smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) gene. This intron interrupts exons encoding the calmodulin binding domain of the kinase. The amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA predicts that telokin is identical to the carboxyl-terminal 155 residues of the smooth muscle MLCK. Unlike the smooth muscle MLCK which is expressed in both smooth and non-muscle tissues, telokin is expressed in some smooth muscle tissues but has not been detected in aortic smooth muscle or in any non-muscle tissues.     

Functional role of the C-terminal domain of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase on the phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin

Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) is known to bind to thin filaments and myosin filaments. Telokin, an independently expressed protein with an identical amino acid sequence to that of the C-terminal domain of MLCK, has been shown to bind to unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin. Thus, the functional significance of the C-terminal domain and the molecular morphology of MLCK were examined in detail. The C-terminal domain was removed from MLCK by alpha-chymotryptic digestion, and the activity of the digested MLCK was measured using myosin or the isolated 20-kDa light chain (LC20) as a substrate. The results showed that the digestion increased K(m) for myosin 3-fold whereas it did not change the value for LC20. In addition, telokin inhibited the phosphorylation of myosin by MLCK by increasing K(m) but only slightly increased K(m) for LC20. Electron microscopy indicated that MLCK was an elongated molecule but was flexible so as to form folded conformations. MLCK was crosslinked to unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide in the absence of Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM), and electron microscopic observation of the products revealed that the MLCK molecule bound to the head-tail junction of heavy meromyosin. These results suggest that MLCK binds to the head-tail junction of unphosphorylated myosin through its C-terminal domain, where LC20 can be promptly phosphorylated through its catalytic domain following the Ca(2+)/CaM-dependent activation.     

Myosin light chain kinase activation and calcium sensitization in smooth muscle in vivo

Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (RLC) in smooth muscle by myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and dephosphorylation by myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) are subject to modulatory cascades that influence the sensitivity of RLC phosphorylation and hence contraction to intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)). We designed a CaM-sensor MLCK containing smooth muscle MLCK fused to two fluorescent proteins linked by the MLCK CaM-binding sequence to measure kinase activation in vivo and expressed it specifically in mouse smooth muscle. In phasic bladder muscle, there was greater RLC phosphorylation and force relative to MLCK activation and [Ca(2+)](i) with carbachol (CCh) compared with KCl treatment, consistent with agonist-dependent inhibition of MLCP. The dependence of force on MLCK activity was nonlinear such that at higher concentrations of CCh, force increased with no change in the net 20% activation of MLCK. A significant but smaller amount of MLCK activation was found during the sustained contractile phase. MLCP inhibition may occur through RhoA/Rho-kinase and/or PKC with phosphorylation of myosin phosphatase targeting subunit-1 (MYPT1) and PKC-potentiated phosphatase inhibitor (CPI-17), respectively. CCh treatment, but not KCl, resulted in MYPT1 and CPI-17 phosphorylation. Both Y27632 (Rho-kinase inhibitor) and calphostin C (PKC inhibitor) reduced CCh-dependent force, RLC phosphorylation, and phosphorylation of MYPT1 (Thr694) without changing MLCK activation. Calphostin C, but not Y27632, also reduced CCh-induced phosphorylation of CPI-17. CCh concentration responses showed that phosphorylation of CPI-17 was more sensitive than MYPT1. Thus the onset of agonist-induced contraction in phasic smooth muscle results from the rapid and coordinated activation of MLCK with hierarchical inhibition of MLCP by CPI-17 and MYPT1 phosphorylation.     

A novel regulatory protein that affects the functions of caldesmon and myosin light chain kinase.

A caldesmon (CaD)-binding protein of about 65 kDa (by SDS-PAGE) was purified from smooth muscle of chicken gizzard. The 65-kDa protein prevented the inhibitory effect of CaD on the ATP-dependent interaction between actin and myosin. Unlike the case with calmodulin (CaM), Ca2+ was not required for this effect. As reported in the preceding communication, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), another well characterized protein that binds CaM, has CaD-like activity that modulates the interaction by binding to actin. The 65-kDa protein was also effective in relieving the modulation, while leaving unaffected the kinase activity that phosphorylates the light chain of smooth muscle myosin.     

ZIP kinase identified as a novel myosin regulatory light chain kinase in HeLa cells.

A novel myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) cDNA was isolated from a HeLa cell cDNA library. The deduced amino acid sequence was identical to that of a zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK) which mediates apoptosis [Kawai et al. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1642-1651]. Here we found that HeLa ZIPK phosphorylated the regulatory light chain of myosin II (MRLC) at both serine 19 and threonine 18 in a Ca2+/calmodulin independent manner. Phosphorylation of myosin II by HeLa ZIPK resulted in activation of actin-activated MgATPase activity of myosin II. HeLa ZIPK is the first non-muscle MLCK that phosphorylates MRLC at two sites.     

A novel regulatory effect of myosin light chain kinase from smooth muscle on the ATP-dependent interaction between actin and myosin.

The actin-binding activity of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) from smooth muscle was studied with special reference to the ATP-dependent interaction between actin and myosin. MLCK in the presence of calmodulin endowed sensitivity to Ca2+ on the movement of actin filaments on phosphorylated myosin from smooth muscle that was fixed on a coverslip. This regulatory effect was not attributable to the kinase activity of MLCK but could be explained by its actin-binding activity. The importance of the actin-binding activity was further substantiated by results of an experiment with Nitellopsis actin-cables in which MLCK regulated the interaction under conditions where MLCK was exclusively associated with the actin-cables.     

Myosin light chain kinase binding to actin filaments

Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) plays important roles in contractile-motile processes of a variety of cells. Three DFRxxL motifs at the kinase N-terminus (residues 2–63) are critical for high-affinity binding to actin-containing filaments [Smith et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29433–29438]. A GST fusion protein containing residues 1–75 of MLCK (GST75-MLCK) bound maximally to both smooth muscle myofilaments and F-actin at 0.28 and 0.31 mol GST75-MLCK/mol actin with respective K_D values of 0.1 μM and 0.8 μM. High-affinity binding of MLCK to actin-containing filaments may be due to each DFRxxL motif binding to one actin monomer in filaments.     

Inhibition of the ATP-dependent interaction of actin and myosin by the catalytic domain of the myosin light chain kinase of smooth muscle: possible involvement in smooth muscle relaxation

Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) phosphorylates the light chain of smooth muscle myosin enabling its interaction with actin. This interaction initiates smooth muscle contraction. MLCK has another role that is not attributable to its phosphorylating activity, i.e., it inhibits the ATP-dependent movement of actin filaments on a glass surface coated with phosphorylated myosin. To analyze the inhibitory effect of MLCK, the catalytic domain of MLCK was obtained with or without the regulatory sequence adjacent to the C-terminal of the domain, and the inhibitory effect of the domain was examined by the movement of actin filaments. All the domains work so as to inhibit actin filament movement whether or not the regulatory sequence is included. When the domain includes the regulatory sequence, calmodulin in the presence of calcium abolishes the inhibition. Since the phosphorylation reaction is not involved in regulating the movement by MLCK, and a catalytic fragment that shows no kinase activity also inhibits movement, the kinase activity is not related to inhibition. Higher concentrations of MLCK inhibit the binding of actin filaments to myosin-coated surfaces as well as their movement. We discuss the dual roles of the domain, the phosphorylation of myosin that allows myosin to cross-bridge with actin and a novel function that breaks cross-bridging.     

Quantitative measurements of Ca(2+)/calmodulin binding and activation of myosin light chain kinase in cells

Myosin II regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation by Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) is implicated in many cellular actin cytoskeletal functions. We examined MLCK activation quantitatively with a fluorescent biosensor MLCK where Ca(2+)-dependent increases in kinase activity were coincident with decreases in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in vitro. In cells stably transfected with CaM sensor MLCK, increasing [Ca(2+)](i) increased MLCK activation and RLC phosphorylation coincidently. There was no evidence for CaM binding but not activating MLCK at low [Ca(2+)](i). At saturating [Ca(2+)](i) MLCK was not fully activated probably due to limited availability of cellular Ca(2+)/CaM.     

Effects of phosphorylation by myosin light chain kinase on the structure of Limulus thick filaments

The results discussed in the preceding paper (Levine, R. J. C., J. L. Woodhead, and H. A. King. 1991. J. Cell Biol. 113:563-572.) indicate that A-band shortening in Limulus muscle is a thick filament response to activation that occurs largely by fragmentation of filament ends. To assess the effect of biochemical changes directly associated with activation on the length and structure of thick filaments from Limulus telson muscle, a dually regulated tissue (Lehman, W., J. Kendrick-Jones, and A. G. Szent Gyorgyi. 1973. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 37:319-330.) we have examined the thick filament response to phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains. In agreement with the previous work of J. Sellers (1981. J. Biol. Chem. 256:9274-9278), Limulus myosin, incubated with partially purified chicken gizzard myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and [gamma 32P]-ATP, binds 2 mol phosphate/mole protein. On autoradiographs of SDS-PAGE, the label is restricted to the two regulatory light chains, LC1 and LC2. Incubation of long (greater than or equal to 4.0 microns) thick filaments, separated from Limulus telson muscle under relaxing conditions, with either intact MLCK in the presence of Ca2+ and calmodulin, or Ca2(+)-independent MLCK obtained by brief chymotryptic digestion (Walsh, M. P., R. Dabrowska, S. Hinkins, and D. J. Hartshorne. 1982. Biochemistry. 21:1919-1925), causes significant changes in their structure. These include: disordering of the helical surface arrangement of myosin heads as they move away from the filament backbone; the presence of distal bends and breaks, with loss of some surface myosin molecules, in each polar filament half; and the production of shorter filaments and end-fragments. The latter structures are similar to those produced by Ca2(+)-activation of skinned fibers (Levine, R. J. C., J. L. Woodhead, and H. A. King. J. Cell Biol. 113:563-572). Rinsing experimental filament preparations with relaxing solution before staining restores some degree of order of the helical surface array, but not filament length. We propose that outward movement of myosin heads and thick filament shortening in Limulus muscle are responses to activation that are dependent on phosphorylation of regulatory myosin light chains. Filament shortening may be due, in large part, to breakage at the filament ends.     

The Ayerst Award Lecture 1990. Calcium-dependent mechanisms of regulation of smooth muscle contraction.

The contractile state of smooth muscle is regulated primarily by the sarcoplasmic (cytosolic) free Ca2+ concentration. A variety of stimuli that induce smooth muscle contraction (e.g., membrane depolarization, alpha-adrenergic and muscarinic agonists) trigger an increase in sarcoplasmic free [Ca2+] from resting levels of 120-270 to 500-700 nM. At the elevated [Ca2+], Ca2+ binds to calmodulin, the ubiquitous and multifunctional Ca(2+)-binding protein. The interaction of Ca2+ with CaM induces a conformational change in the Ca(2+)-binding protein with exposure of a site(s) of interaction with target proteins, the most important of which in the context of smooth muscle contraction is the enzyme myosin light chain kinase. The interaction of calmodulin with myosin light chain kinase results in activation of the kinase that catalyzes phosphorylation of myosin at serine-19 of each of the two 20-kDa light chains (native myosin is a hexamer composed of two heavy chains (230 kDa each) and two pairs of light chains (one pair of 20 kDa each and the other pair of 17 kDa each)). This simple phosphorylation reaction triggers cycling of myosin cross-bridges along actin filaments and the development of force. Relaxation of the muscle follows removal of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasm, whereupon calmodulin dissociates from myosin light chain kinase regenerating the inactive kinase; myosin is dephosphorylated by myosin light chain phosphatase(s), whereupon it dissociates and remains detached from the actin filament and the muscle relaxes. A substantial body of evidence has been accumulated in support of this central role of myosin phosphorylation-dephosphorylation in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. However, a wide range of physiological and biochemical studies supports the existence of additional, secondary Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms that can modulate or fine-tune the contractile state of the smooth muscle cell. Three such mechanisms have emerged: (i) the actin-, tropomyosin-, and calmodulin-binding protein, calponin; (ii) the actin-, myosin-, tropomyosin-, and calmodulin-binding protein, caldesmon; and (iii) the Ca(2+)- and phospholipid-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase C).     

In vitro movement of actin filaments on gizzard smooth muscle myosin: requirement of phosphorylation of myosin light chain and effects of tropomyosin and caldesmon

ATP-dependent movement of actin filaments on smooth muscle myosin was investigated by using the in vitro motility assay method in which myosin was fixed on the surface of a coverslip in a phosphorylated or an unphosphorylated state. Actin filaments slid on gizzard myosin phosphorylated with myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) at a rate of 0.35 micron/s, but did not slide at all on unphosphorylated myosin. The movement of actin filaments on phosphorylated myosin was stopped by perfusion of phosphatase. Subsequent perfusion with a solution containing MLCK, calmodulin, and Ca2+ enabled actin filaments to move again. The sliding velocities on monophosphorylated and diphosphorylated myosin by MLCK were not different. Actin filaments did not move on myosin phosphorylated with protein kinase C (PKC). The sliding velocity on myosin phosphorylated with both MLCK and PKC was identical to that on myosin phosphorylated only with MLCK. Gizzard tropomyosin enhanced the sliding velocity to 0.76 micron/s. Gizzard caldesmon decreased the sliding velocity with increase in its concentration. At a 5-fold molar ratio of caldesmon to actin, the movement stopped completely. This inhibitory effect of caldesmon was relieved upon addition of excess calmodulin and Ca2+.     

Organization of the genetic locus for chicken myosin light chain kinase is complex: Multiple proteins are encoded and exhibit differential expression and localization

We report that the genetic locus that encodes vertebrate smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) and kinase-related protein (KRP) has a complex arrangement and a complex pattern of expression. Three proteins are encoded by 31 exons that have only one variation, that of the first exon of KRP, and the genomic locus spans approximately 100 kb of DNA. The three proteins can differ in their relative abundance and localization among tissues and with development. MLCK is a calmodulin (CaM) regulated protein kinase that phosphorylates the light chain of myosin II. The chicken has two MLCK isoforms encoded by the MLCK/KRP locus. KRP does not bind CaM and is not a protein kinase. However, KRP binds to and regulates the structure of myosin II. Thus, KRP and MLCK have the same subcellular target, the myosin II molecular motor system. We examined the tissue and cellular localization of KRP and MLCK in the chicken embryo and in adult chicken tissues. We report on the selective localization of KRP and MLCK among and within tissues and on a differential distribution of the proteins between embryonic and adult tissues. The results fill a void in our knowledge about the organization of the MLCK/KRP genetic locus, which appears to be a late evolving regulatory paradigm, and suggest an independent and complex regulation of expression of the gene products from the MLCK/KRP genetic locus that may reflect a basic principle found in other eukaryotic gene clusters that encode functionally linked proteins. J. Cell. Biochem. 70:402–413, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Filamentous smooth muscle myosin is regulated by phosphorylation

The enzymatic activity of filamentous dephosphorylated smooth muscle myosin has been difficult to determine because the polymer disassembles to the folded conformation in the presence of MgATP. Monoclonal antirod antibodies were used here to "fix" dephosphorylated myosin in the filamentous state. The steady-state actin-activated ATPase of phosphorylated filaments was 30-100-fold higher than that of antibody- stabilized dephosphorylated filaments, suggesting that phosphorylation can activate ATPase activity independent of changes in assembly. The degree of regulation may exceed 100-fold, because steady-state measurements slightly overestimate the rate of product release from dephosphorylated filaments. Single-turnover experiments in the absence of actin showed that although dephosphorylated folded myosin released products at the low rate of 0.0005 s-1 (Cross, R. A., K. E. Cross, A. Sobieszek. 1986. EMBO [Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.] J. 5:2637-2641) the rate of product release from dephosphorylated filaments was only 3-12-fold higher, depending on the ionic strength. The addition of actin did not increase this rate to any appreciable extent. Dephosphorylated filaments and dephosphorylated heavy meromyosin (Sellers, J. R. 1985. J. Biol. Chem. 260:15815-15819) thus have similar low rates of phosphate release both in the presence and absence of actin. These results show that light chain phosphorylation alone, without invoking other mechanisms, is an effective switch for regulating the activity of smooth muscle myosin filaments.     

Modulation of myosin filament activation by telokin in smooth muscle liberation of myosin kinase and phosphatase from supramolecular complexes

The mechanism of telokin action on reversible phosphorylation of turkey gizzard myosin was investigated using a native-like filamentous myosin. This myosin contained endogenous calmodulin (CaM) and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) at a molar ratio to myosin of about 1 to 40 or less depending on the initial extractions conditions. These levels were sufficient to fully phosphorylate myosin within 20-40 s or less after addition of [gamma-32P]ATP, but when the ATP was depleted, they became dephosphorylated indicating the presence of myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP). Addition of telokin at the 1 to 1 or higher molar ratio to myosin caused a three- to five-fold inhibition of the initial phosphorylation rates (without reduction of the overall extent of phosphorylation) and produced a similar increase in the rate of dephosphorylation. The inhibition was also observed for myosin filaments free of MLCK and CaM together with constitutively active MLCKs produced by digestion, or by expression of a truncated mammalian kinase as well as for the wild-type enzyme. Thus, neither N- nor C-terminal of MLCK was necessary for interaction of myosin with telokin and the inhibition resulted from telokin-induced change of myosin head configuration within the filament that prevented their ordered, paracrystaline-like, aggregation. Sedimentation of the filamentous myosin in glycerol gradients showed that this change made the filaments less compact and facilitated release of the endogenous MLCK/CaM complex. For a mixture of the filaments with or without the complex, the configuration change resulted in an increase of the phosphorylation rate but not in its inhibition. The increase of the rate resulting from the liberation of the complex was also observed in mixtures of the filamentous myosin with added isolated regulatory light chain (ReLC) or soluble myosin head subfragment. This observation reinforces the above conclusions. The acceleration of the MLCP activity by telokin was shown to result from dissociation of its catalytic subunit from a MLCK/MLCP complex bound to the filamentous myosin. Analogous desensitizing effects of telokin were also demonstrated for the contraction and relaxation cycle of Triton-skinned fibers from guinea pig Teania coli. Taken together, our results indicate that telokin acted as an effective modulator or chaperone of the myosin filament and a scheme for its action in smooth muscle was proposed.     

Modulation of the stability of rabbit skeletal muscle myosin light chain kinase through the calmodulin-binding domain

The binding of Ca2+(4).calmodulin (CaM) to rabbit skeletal muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) is required for expression of the enzyme's activity. While both MLCK and CaM were stable at 30 degrees C, their complex was not. The binding of CaM to MLCK resulted in a time- and temperature-dependent inactivation that reflected an intrinsic instability of the complex. Separation of the components of the inactive complex yielded functional CaM, but catalytically inert MLCK, indicating that the site of the inactivating event was confined to MLCK. The behavior of proteolytic fragments further localized this event to the C-terminal 60% of the 603-residue protein. Changes in the tryptophan fluorescence and proteolytic susceptibility of MLCK-CaM indicated that a conformational change accompanied, and thus may have caused, inactivation. Substrates protected against inactivation, as did millimolar concentrations of Mg2+, Mn2+, and Ca2+. These metals appeared to bind to a site on MLCK distinct from that which recognized Mg2+.ATP. A proteolytic fragment of MLCK lacking the ability to bind CaM, C beta 35 (residues 255-584; Edelman, A. M., Takio, K., Blumenthal, D. K., Hansen, R. S., Walsh, K. A., Titani, K., and Krebs, E. G. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11275-11285), was unstable at 30 degrees C, whereas a similar fragment which does bind CaM, T beta 40 (residues 236-595; Edelman, A. M., Takio, K., Blumenthal, D. K., Hansen, R. S., Walsh, K. A., Titani, K., and Krebs, E. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11275-11285), was unstable only when CaM was bound.     

Ca2+ activation of smooth muscle contraction: evidence for the involvement of calmodulin that is bound to the triton insoluble fraction even in the absence of Ca2+.

Smooth muscle contraction is activated by phosphorylation of the 20-kDa light chains of myosin catalyzed by Ca(2+)/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). According to popular current theory, the CaM involved in MLCK regulation is Ca(2+)-free and dissociated from the kinase at resting cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)). An increase in [Ca(2+)](i) saturates the four Ca(2+)-binding sites of CaM, which then binds to and activates actin-bound MLCK. The results of this study indicate that this theory requires revision. Sufficient CaM was retained after skinning (demembranation) of rat tail arterial smooth muscle in the presence of EGTA to support Ca(2+)-evoked contraction, as observed previously with other smooth muscle tissues. This tightly bound CaM was released by the CaM antagonist trifluoperazine (TFP) in the presence of Ca(2+). Following removal of the (Ca(2+))(4)-CaM-TFP(2) complex, Ca(2+) no longer induced contraction. The addition of exogenous CaM to TFP-treated tissue at a [Ca(2+)] subthreshold for contraction or even in the absence of Ca(2+) (presence of 5 mm EGTA), followed by washout of unbound CaM, restored Ca(2+)-induced contraction; this required MLCK activation, since it was blocked by the MLCK inhibitor ML-9. The data suggest, therefore, that a specific pool of cellular CaM, tightly bound to myofilaments at resting [Ca(2+)](i), or even in the absence of Ca(2+), is responsible for activation of contraction following a local increase in [Ca(2+)]. This mechanism would allow for localized changes in [Ca(2+)] in regions of the cell distant from the myofilaments to regulate distinct Ca(2+)-dependent processes without triggering a contractile response. Immobilized CaM, therefore, resembles troponin C, the Ca(2+)-binding regulatory protein of striated muscle, which is also bound to the thin filament in a Ca(2+)-independent manner.