An in vivo RNAi assay identifies major genetic and cellular requirements for primary piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila

In Drosophila, PIWI proteins and bound PIWI‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs) form the core of a small RNA‐mediated defense system against selfish genetic elements. Within germline cells, piRNAs are processed from piRNA clusters and transposons to be loaded into Piwi/Aubergine/AGO3 and a subset of piRNAs undergoes target‐dependent amplification. In contrast, gonadal somatic support cells express only Piwi, lack signs of piRNA amplification and exhibit primary piRNA biogenesis from piRNA clusters. Neither piRNA processing/loading nor Piwi‐mediated target silencing is understood at the genetic, cellular or molecular level. We developed an in vivo RNAi assay for the somatic piRNA pathway and identified the RNA helicase Armitage, the Tudor domain containing RNA helicase Yb and the putative nuclease Zucchini as essential factors for primary piRNA biogenesis. Lack of any of these proteins leads to transposon de‐silencing, to a collapse in piRNA levels and to a failure in Piwi‐nuclear accumulation. We show that Armitage and Yb interact physically and co‐localize in cytoplasmic Yb bodies, which flank P bodies. Loss of Zucchini leads to an accumulation of Piwi and Armitage in Yb bodies, indicating that Yb bodies are sites of primary piRNA biogenesis.     

Novel quality metrics allow identifying and generating high-quality assemblies of piRNA clusters

In most animals, it is thought that the proliferation of a transposable element (TE) is stopped when the TE jumps into a piRNA cluster. Despite this central importance, little is known about the composition and the evolutionary dynamics of piRNA clusters. This is largely because piRNA clusters are notoriously difficult to assemble as they are frequently composed of highly repetitive DNA. With long reads, we may finally be able to obtain reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Unfortunately, it is unclear how to generate and identify the best assemblies, as many assembly strategies exist and standard quality metrics are ignorant of TEs. To address these problems, we introduce several novel quality metrics that assess: (a) the fraction of completely assembled piRNA clusters, (b) the quality of the assembled clusters and (c) whether an assembly captures the overall TE landscape of an organisms (i.e. the abundance, the number of SNPs and internal deletions of all TE families). The requirements for computing these metrics vary, ranging from annotations of piRNA clusters to consensus sequences of TEs and genomic sequencing data. Using these novel metrics, we evaluate the effect of assembly algorithm, polishing, read length, coverage, residual polymorphisms and finally identify strategies that yield reliable assemblies of piRNA clusters. Based on an optimized approach, we provide assemblies for the two Drosophila melanogaster strains Canton-S and Pi2. About 80% of known piRNA clusters were assembled in both strains. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of our approach by extending our metrics to humans and Arabidopsis thaliana.     

Primary piRNA biogenesis: caught up in a Maelstrom

Precursors for most Piwi‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are indistinguishable from other RNA polymerase II‐transcribed long non‐coding RNAs. So, it is currently unclear how they are recognized as substrates by the piRNA processing machinery that resides in cytoplasmic granules called nuage. In this issue, Castaneda et al (2014) reveal a role for the nuage component and nucleo‐cytoplasmic shuttling protein Maelstrom in mouse piRNA biogenesis.     

Functional involvement of Tudor and dPRMT5 in the piRNA processing pathway in Drosophila germlines

In Drosophila, the PIWI proteins, Aubergine (Aub), AGO3, and Piwi are expressed in germlines and function in silencing transposons by associating with PIWI‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs). Recent studies show that PIWI proteins contain symmetric dimethyl‐arginines (sDMAs) and that dPRMT5/Capsuleen/DART5 is the modifying enzyme. Here, we show that Tudor (Tud), one of Tud domain‐containing proteins, associates with Aub and AGO3, specifically through their sDMA modifications and that these three proteins form heteromeric complexes. piRNA precursor‐like molecules are detected in these complexes. The expression levels of Aub and AGO3, along with their degree of sDMA modification, were not changed by tud mutations. However, the population of transposon‐derived piRNAs associated with Aub and AGO3 was altered by tud mutations, whereas the total amounts of small RNAs on Aub and AGO3 was increased. Loss of dprmt5 did not change the stability of Aub, but impaired its association with Tud and lowered piRNA association with Aub. Thus, in germline cells, piRNAs are quality‐controlled by dPRMT5 that modifies PIWI proteins, in tight association with Tud.     

piRNA clusters as a main source of small RNAs in the animal germline

PIWI subfamily Argonaute proteins and small RNAs bound to them (PIWI interacting RNA, piRNA) control mobilization of transposable elements (TE) in the animal germline. piRNAs are generated by distinct genomic regions termed piRNA clusters. piRNA clusters are often extensive loci enriched in damaged fragments of TEs. New TE integration into piRNA clusters causes production of TE-specific piRNAs and repression of cognate sequences. piRNAs are thought to be generated from long single-stranded precursors encoded by piRNA clusters. Special chromatin structures might be essential to distinguish these genomic loci as a source for piRNAs. In this review, we present recent findings on the structural organization of piRNA clusters and piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila and other organisms, which are important for understanding a key epigenetic mechanism that provides defense against TE expansion.     

PNLDC1, mouse pre‐piRNA Trimmer,is required for meiotic and post‐meiotic male germ cell development

PIWI‐interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are germ cell‐specific small RNAs essential for retrotransposon gene silencing and male germ cell development. In piRNA biogenesis, the endonuclease MitoPLD/Zucchini cleaves long, single‐stranded RNAs to generate 5′ termini of precursor piRNAs (pre‐piRNAs) that are consecutively loaded into PIWI‐family proteins. Subsequently, these pre‐piRNAs are trimmed at their 3′‐end by an exonuclease called Trimmer. Recently, poly(A)‐specific ribonuclease‐like domain‐containing 1 (PNLDC1) was identified as the pre‐piRNA Trimmer in silkworms. However, the function of PNLDC1 in other species remains unknown. Here, we generate Pnldc1 mutant mice and analyze small RNAs in their testes. Our results demonstrate that mouse PNLDC1 functions in the trimming of both embryonic and post‐natal pre‐piRNAs. In addition, piRNA trimming defects in embryonic and post‐natal testes cause impaired DNA methylation and reduced MIWI expression, respectively. Phenotypically, both meiotic and post‐meiotic arrests are evident in the same individual Pnldc1 mutant mouse. The former and latter phenotypes are similar to those of MILI and MIWI mutant mice, respectively. Thus, PNLDC1‐mediated piRNA trimming is indispensable for the function of piRNAs throughout mouse spermatogenesis.