Fluorescently labelled guanine nucleotide binding proteins to analyse elementary steps of GAP-catalysed reactions

Downregulation of small guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (GNBPs) requires the interaction with their corresponding GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which increase the slow intrinsic GTPase reaction by several orders of magnitude. On the basis of the structure of H-Ras in complex with the catalytic domain of p120-GAP, we have developed a set of site-specifically labelled Ras-variants, one of which turned out to be particularly sensitive for studying the interaction with Ras-specific GAPs. This specific fluorescent reporter group and the use of manganese to increase the rate of the chemical reaction step allowed us to identify differences in the rate-limiting step of either the GAP-334 or NF1-333 catalyzed reaction. The assay was also applied to study the interaction of the Ras-related protein Rap1B with Rap1GAP, for which no detailed kinetic analysis was available. Single-turnover experiments of this reaction show that the low affinity of the complex (50 microM) is due to a slow association rate as well as a fast dissociation rate. RapGAP promotes AlFx binding to Rap1B, even though it does not contain a catalytic arginine. The rate-limiting step of the RapGAP catalysed reaction is release of inorganic phosphate, which is about five times slower than the chemical cleavage step. Our data reveal marked differences in GAP/target interactions even between closely related systems and suggest that the fluorescent reporter group method might be generally applicable to many other GNBPs and their cognate GAPs.     

Rheb is a direct target of the tuberous sclerosis tumour suppressor proteins

Mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes cause tuberous sclerosis, a benign tumour syndrome in humans. Tsc2 possesses a domain that shares homology with the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) domain of Rap1-GAP, suggesting that a GTPase might be the physiological target of Tsc2. Here we show that the small GTPase Rheb (Ras homologue enriched in brain) is a direct target of Tsc2 GAP activity both in vivo and in vitro. Point mutations in the GAP domain of Tsc2 disrupted its ability to regulate Rheb without affecting the ability of Tsc2 to form a complex with Tsc1. Our studies identify Rheb as a molecular target of the TSC tumour suppressors.     

Differential G-alpha interaction capacities of the GoLoco motifs in Rap GTPase activating proteins

GoLoco motif proteins act as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) for G-protein alpha subunits of the adenylyl cyclase-inhibitory (Galpha(i/o)) class. Rap1GAP2 is a newly identified GoLoco motif- and RapGAP domain-containing protein, and thus is considered a potential integrator of heterotrimeric and monomeric GTPase signaling. Primary sequence analysis indicated that the Rap1GAP2 GoLoco motif contains a lysine (Lys-75), rather than an arginine, at the crucial residue responsible for binding the alpha and beta phosphates of GDP and exerting GDI activity. To determine the functional outcome of this sequence variation we conducted a biophysical analysis of the human Rap1GAP2b/c GoLoco motif. We found that human Rap1GAP2b/c was deficient in GDI activity and Galpha interaction capability. Mutation of lysine-75 to arginine could not regain functional activity of the Rap1GAP2b/c GoLoco motif. Thus, the Rap1GAP2b/c GoLoco motif can be classed as inactive towards Galpha subunits. We also found that the Rap1GAP1a GoLoco motif, which lacks seven N-terminal amino acid residues present in canonical GoLoco motifs, does not interact with Galpha(i1). In contrast, the GoLoco motif of Rap1GAP1b, which is canonical in primary sequence, was found to interact with Galpha(i1).GDP.     

Unravelling the mechanism of dual‐specificity GAPs

The molecular mechanism by which dual‐specificity RasGAPs of the Gap1 subfamily activate the GTP hydrolysis of both Rap and Ras is an unresolved phenomenon. RasGAPs and RapGAPs use different strategies to stimulate the GTPase reaction of their cognate G‐proteins. RasGAPs contribute an arginine finger to orient through the Gln61 of Ras the nucleophilic water molecule. RapGAP contributes an asparagine (Asn thumb) into the active site to substitute for the missing Gln61. Here, by using steady‐state kinetic assays and time‐resolved Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments with wild type and mutant proteins, we unravel the remarkable mechanism for the specificity switch. The plasticity of GAP1^IP4BP and RASAL is mediated by the extra GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) domains, which promote a different orientation of Ras and Rap's switch‐II and catalytic residues in the active site. Thereby, Gln63 in Rap adopts the catalytic role normally taken by Gln61 of Ras. This re‐orientation requires specific interactions between switch‐II of Rap and helix‐α6 of GAPs. This supports the notion that the specificities of fl proteins versus GAP domains are potentially different.     

The role of Gln61 and Glu63 of Ras GTPases in their activation by NF1 and Ras GAP.

Two distinct GAPs of 120 and 235 kDa called GAP1 and NF1 serve as attenuators of Ras, a member of GTP-dependent signal transducers, by stimulating its intrinsic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity. The GAP1 (also called Ras GAP) is highly specific for Ras and does not stimulate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rap1 or Rho. Using GAP1C, the C-terminal GTPase activating domain (residues 720-1044) of bovine GAP1, we have shown previously that the GAP1 specificity is determined by the Ras domain (residues 61-65) where Gln61 plays the primary role. The corresponding domain (residues 1175-1531) of human NF1 (called NF1C), which shares only 26% sequence identity with the GAP1C, also activates Ras GTPases. In this article, we demonstrate that the NF1C, like the GAP1C, is highly specific for Ras and does not activate either Rap1 or Rho GTPases. Furthermore, using a series of chimeric Ras/Rap1 and mutated Ras GTPases, we show that Gln at position 61 of the GTPases primarily determines that NF1C as well as GAP1C activates Ras GTPases, but not Rap1 GTPases, and Glu at position 63 of the GTPases is required for maximizing the sensitivity of Ras GTPases to both NF1C and GAP1C. Interestingly, replacement of Glu63 of c-HaRas by Lys reduces its intrinsic GTPase activity and abolishes the GTPase activation by both NF1C and GAP1C. Thus, the potentiation of oncogenicity by Lys63 mutation of c-HaRas appears primarily to be due to the loss of its sensitivity to the two major Ras signal attenuators (NF1 and GAP1).     

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy on the Rap.RapGAP reaction, GTPase activation without an arginine finger

GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) down-regulate Ras-like proteins by stimulating their GTP hydrolysis, and a malfunction of this reaction leads to disease formation. In most cases, the molecular mechanism of activation involves stabilization of a catalytic Gln and insertion of a catalytic Arg into the active site by GAP. Rap1 neither possesses a Gln nor does its cognate Rap-GAP employ an Arg. Recently it was proposed that RapGAP provides a catalytic Asn, which substitutes for the Gln found in all other Ras-like proteins (Daumke, O., Weyand, M., Chakrabarti, P. P., Vetter, I. R., and Wittinghofer, A. (2004) Nature 429, 197-201). Here, RapGAP-mediated activation has been investigated by time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Although the intrinsic hydrolysis reactions of Rap and Ras are very similar, the GAP-catalyzed reaction shows unique features. RapGAP binding induces a GTP(*) conformation in which the three phosphate groups are oriented such that they are vibrationally coupled to each other, in contrast to what was seen in the intrinsic and the Ras.RasGAP reactions. However, the charge shift toward beta-phosphate observed with RasGAP was also observed for RapGAP. A GDP.P(i) intermediate accumulates in the GAP-catalyzed reaction, because the release of P(i) is eight times slower than the cleavage reaction, and significant GTP synthesis from GDP.P(i) was observed. Partial steps of the cleavage reaction are correlated with structural changes of protein side groups and backbone. Thus, the Rap.RapGAP catalytic machinery compensates for the absence of a cis-Gln by a trans-Asn and for the catalytic Arg by inducing a different GTP conformation that is more prone to be attacked by a water molecule.     

The Rap-RapGAP complex: GTP hydrolysis without catalytic glutamine and arginine residues

The GTP-binding protein Rap1 regulates integrin-mediated and other cell adhesion processes. Unlike most other Ras-related proteins, it contains a threonine in switch II instead of a glutamine (Gln61 in Ras), a residue crucial for the GTPase reaction of most G proteins. Furthermore, unlike most other GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for small G proteins, which supply a catalytically important Arg-finger, no arginine residue of RapGAP makes a significant contribution to the GTPase reaction of Rap1. For a detailed understanding of the reaction mechanism, we have solved the structure of Rap1 in complex with Rap1GAP. It shows that the Thr61 of Rap is away from the active site and that an invariant asparagine of RapGAPs, the Asn-thumb, takes over the role of the cis-glutamine of Ras, Rho or Ran. The structure and biochemical data allow to further explain the mechanism and to define the important role of a conserved tyrosine. The structure and biochemical data furthermore show that the RapGAP homologous region of the tumour suppressor Tuberin is sufficient for catalysis on Rheb.     

Ca2+-dependent monomer and dimer formation switches CAPRI Protein between Ras GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and RapGAP activities

CAPRI is a member of the GAP1 family of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for small G proteins. It is known to function as an amplitude sensor for intracellular Ca(2+) levels stimulated by extracellular signals and has a catalytic domain with dual RasGAP and RapGAP activities. Here, we have investigated the mechanism that switches CAPRI between its two GAP activities. We demonstrate that CAPRI forms homodimers in vitro and in vivo in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. The site required for dimerization was pinpointed by deletion and point mutations to a helix motif that forms a hydrophobic face in the extreme C-terminal tail of the CAPRI protein. Deletion of this helix motif abolished dimer formation but did not affect translocation of CAPRI to the plasma membrane upon cell stimulation with histamine. We found that dimeric and monomeric CAPRI coexist in cells and that the ratio of dimeric to monomeric CAPRI increases upon cell stimulation with histamine. Free Ca(2+) at physiologically relevant concentrations was both necessary and sufficient for dimer formation. Importantly, the monomeric and dimeric forms of CAPRI exhibited differential GAP activities in vivo; the wild-type form of CAPRI had stronger RapGAP activity than RasGAP activity, whereas a monomeric CAPRI mutant showed stronger RasGAP than RapGAP activity. These results demonstrate that CAPRI switches between its dual GAP roles by forming monomers or homodimers through a process regulated by Ca(2+). We propose that Ca(2+)-dependent dimerization of CAPRI may serve to coordinate Ras and Rap1 signaling pathways.     

A C-terminal domain of GAP is sufficient to stimulate ras p21 GTPase activity.

The cDNA for bovine ras p21 GTPase activating protein (GAP) has been cloned and the 1044 amino acid polypeptide encoded by the clone has been shown to bind the GTP complexes of both normal and oncogenic Harvey (Ha) ras p21. To identify the regions of GAP critical for the catalytic stimulation of ras p21 GTPase activity, a series of truncated forms of GAP protein were expressed in Escherichia coli. The C-terminal 343 amino acids of GAP (residues 702-1044) were observed to bind Ha ras p21-GTP and stimulate Ha ras p21 GTPase activity with the same efficiency (kcat/KM congruent to 1 x 10(6) M-1 s-1 at 24 degrees C) as GAP purified from bovine brain or full-length GAP expressed in E. coli. Deletion of the final 61 amino acid residues of GAP (residues 986-1044) rendered the protein insoluble upon expression in E. coli. These results define a distinct catalytic domain at the C terminus of GAP. In addition, GAP contains amino acid similarity with the B and C box domains conserved among phospholipase C-II, the crk oncogene product, and the non-receptor tyrosine kinase oncogene products. This homologous region is located in the N-terminal half of GAP outside of the catalytic domain that stimulates ras p21 GTPase activity and may constitute a distinct structural or functional domain within the GAP protein.     

The Ability of GAP1IP4BP To Function as a Rap1 GTPase-Activating Protein (GAP) Requires Its Ras GAP-Related Domain and an Arginine Finger Rather than an Asparagine Thumb

GAP1^IP4BP is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that includes GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), surrounded by amino-terminal C2 domains and a carboxy-terminal PH/Btk domain, these proteins, with the notable exception of GAP1^m, possess an unexpected arginine finger-dependent GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap1 (S. Kupzig, D. Deaconescu, D. Bouyoucef, S. A. Walker, Q. Liu, C. L. Polte, O. Daumke, T. Ishizaki, P. J. Lockyer, A. Wittinghofer, and P. J. Cullen, J. Biol. Chem. 281:9891-9900, 2006). Here, we have examined the mechanism through which GAP1^IP4BP can function as a Rap1 GAP. We show that deletion of domains on either side of the RasGRD, while not affecting Ras GAP activity, do dramatically perturb Rap1 GAP activity. By utilizing GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we establish that although the C2 and PH/Btk domains are required to stabilize the RasGRD, it is this domain which contains the catalytic machinery required for Rap1 GAP activity. Finally, a key residue in Rap1-specific GAPs is a catalytic asparagine, the so-called asparagine thumb. By generating a molecular model describing the predicted Rap1-binding site in the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP, we show that mutagenesis of individual asparagine or glutamine residues that lie in close proximity to the predicted binding site has no detectable effect on the in vivo Rap1 GAP activity of GAP1^IP4BP. In contrast, we present evidence consistent with a model in which the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1, allowing stabilization of the transition state during GTP hydrolysis initiated by the arginine finger.The Ras-like family of small GTPases are ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved proteins that, by undergoing conformational changes in response to the alternate binding of GDP and GTP, function as binary switches (28, 31, 35). The GDP-bound “off” state and the GTP-bound “on” state recognize distinct effector proteins, thereby allowing the regulation of a variety of downstream signaling events (28, 31, 35). While Ras is the best-known and best-studied Ras-like GTPase, Rap1 has recently attracted considerable attention (reviewed in reference 20).Rap1 was originally identified through its ability, when overexpressed, to reverse the phenotype of K-Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (19). As Ras and Rap1 have very similar effector regions, the ability of Rap1 to reverse the transformed phenotype appeared to arise through an ability to compete with K-Ras effectors. For example, Rap1 binds the Ras effector Raf1 but this does not lead to its activation (11). This is consistent with a simple model in which Rap1 functions as a Ras antagonist (6, 37). However, recent work has challenged this view. Increasing evidence points to Rap1 interacting with its own panel of effectors through which it controls cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interactions (reviewed in reference 20).Like that of other GTPases, the activation of Ras and Rap1 is regulated through guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which control activation by stimulating the exchange of GDP for GTP. Inactivation is driven by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras and Rap1, thereby leading to GTP hydrolysis. A wide variety of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GAPs specific for these GTPases have been identified (14). Through the arrangement of different modular domains, these proteins are regulated following the activation of cell surface receptors. This occurs either through direct association with the activated receptor or indirectly through second messengers (4, 5, 14, 41).Mammalian proteins capable of functioning as Ras GAPs include NF1 (3, 27, 40), p120^GAP (38), the semaphorin 4D receptor plexin-B1 (29), and members of the GAP1 (reviewed in reference 41) and SynGAP (DAB2IP, nGAP, and SynGAP) families (10, 18, 39). These function as Ras GAPs by supplying a catalytic arginine residue—the arginine finger—into the active site of Ras. This stabilizes the transition state of the GTPase reaction, increasing the reaction rate by more than 1,000-fold (1, 33, 34).Rap1 GAPs include Rap GAPs I and II, the SPA-1 family (SPA-1, SPAR, SPAL, and E6TP1), and tuberin (16, 17, 26, 32). Unlike Ras, Rap1 does not possess the catalytic glutamine residue that is critical for GTP hydrolysis in Ras. This fundamental difference means that the mechanisms by which Ras and Rap1 GAPs function are distinct. Rap1 GAPs do not employ a catalytic arginine residue (8, 9); instead, they provide a catalytic asparagine—the asparagine thumb—to stimulate GTP hydrolysis (15). Here the asparagine carboxamide side chain has a function similar to that of the glutamine residue in Ras, stabilizing the position of the nucleophilic water and γ-phosphate in the transition complex (15, 36).Given such distinct catalytic mechanisms, surprisingly, some Ras GAPs, while having no detectable sequence homology with any Rap1 GAPs, are capable of stimulating the GTPase activity of Rap1. The first protein found to display such dual activities was GAP1^IP4BP (13) (also known as RASA3, GAPIII, and R-Ras GAP). This is a member of the GAP1 family, which also comprises GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL (2, 23-25). These proteins are characterized by a domain architecture comprising amino-terminal tandem C2 domains, a highly conserved central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), and a carboxy-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that is associated with a Bruton''s tyrosine kinase (Btk) motif (41). Consistent with the presence of the RasGRD, all proteins display Ras GAP activity, although each is differentially regulated following receptor stimulation (41). With the notable exception of GAP1^m, all GAP1 proteins also possess efficient Rap1 GAP activity (22). Such dual specificity is not restricted solely to GAP1 proteins. Recently, C2 domain-containing SynGAP—a neuronal Ras GAP—has also been shown to display Rap1 GAP activity (21), an activity that appears to require, alongside the RasGRD, the presence of a single C2 domain (30).Here we have examined the mechanism behind the dual Ras and Rap1 GAP activities of GAP1^IP4BP. Through the generation of a series of GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we have established that while the C2 domains of GAP1^IP4BP are required to stabilize the RasGRD, these domains do not supply catalytic residues required for Rap1 GAP activity. Rather, the Rap1 GAP catalytic machinery appears to reside solely within the RasGRD. By the site-directed mutagenesis of selected asparagine and glutamine residues within this domain—selected following the generation of a predicted molecular model of the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD-Ras(Rap1) complex—we establish that the ability of GAP1^IP4BP to function as a Rap1 GAP does not occur via a mechanism that utilizes a classic asparagine thumb. Rather, we suggest that the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1 in a manner that allows a catalytic arginine finger from GAP1^IP4BP to drive the hydrolysis of GTP.     

Mechanism of regulation of the Epac family of cAMP-dependent RapGEFs

Epac1 (cAMP-GEFI) and Epac2 (cAMP-GEFII) are closely related guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the small GTPase Rap1, which are directly regulated by cAMP. Here we show that both GEFs efficiently activate Rap2 as well. A third member of the family, Repac (GFR), which lacks the cAMP dependent regulatory sequences, is a constitutive activator of both Rap1 and Rap2. In contrast to Epac1, Epac2 contains a second cAMP binding domain at the N terminus, as does the Epac homologue from Caenorhabditis elegans. Affinity measurements show that this distal cAMP binding domain (the A-site) binds cAMP with much lower affinity than the cAMP binding domain proximal to the catalytic domain (the B-site), which is present in both Epac1 and Epac2. Deletion mutant analysis shows that the high affinity cAMP binding domains are sufficient to regulate the GEFs in vitro. Interestingly, isolated fragments containing the B-sites of either Epac1 or Epac2, but not the A-site from Epac2, inhibit the catalytic domains in trans. This inhibition is relieved by the addition of cAMP. In addition to the cAMP binding domains, both Epac1 and Epac2 have a DEP domain. Deletion of this domain does not affect regulation of Epac1 activity but affects membrane localization. From these results, we conclude that all three members of the Epac family regulate both Rap1 and Rap2. Furthermore, we conclude that the catalytic activity of Epac1 is constrained by a direct interaction between GEF and high affinity cAMP binding domains in the absence of cAMP. Epac1 becomes activated by a release of this inhibition when cAMP is bound.     

Differential roles of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in Ras-ERK signaling and AMPA receptor trafficking

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) control bidirectional synaptic plasticity by regulating postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs). Here we show that NMDAR activation can have differential effects on AMPAR trafficking, depending on the subunit composition of NMDARs. In mature cultured neurons, NR2A-NMDARs promote, whereas NR2B-NMDARs inhibit, the surface expression of GluR1, primarily by regulating its surface insertion. In mature neurons, NR2B is coupled to inhibition rather than activation of the Ras-ERK pathway, which drives surface delivery of GluR1. Moreover, the synaptic Ras GTPase activating protein (GAP) SynGAP is selectively associated with NR2B-NMDARs in brain and is required for inhibition of NMDAR-dependent ERK activation. Preferential coupling of NR2B to SynGAP could explain the subtype-specific function of NR2B-NMDARs in inhibition of Ras-ERK, removal of synaptic AMPARs, and weakening of synaptic transmission.     

GAP1 family members constitute bifunctional Ras and Rap GTPase-activating proteins

GAP1(IP4BP) is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (Ras GAPs) that includes GAP1(m), CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP domain, surrounded by amino-terminal C(2) domains and a carboxyl-terminal pleckstrin homology/Bruton's tyrosine kinase domain, GAP1(IP4BP) has previously been shown to possess an unexpected GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap, besides the predicted Ras GAP activity (Cullen, P. J., Hsuan, J. J., Truong, O., Letcher, A. J., Jackson, T. R., Dawson, A. P., and Irvine, R. F. (1995) Nature 376, 527-530). Here we have shown that GAP1(IP4BP) is indeed an efficient Ras/Rap GAP, having K(m)s of 213 and 42 microm and estimated k(cat)s of 48 and 16 s(-1) for Ras and Rap, respectively. For this dual activity, regions outside the Ras GAP domain are required, as the isolated domain (residues 291-569) retains a pronounced Ras GAP activity yet has very low activity toward Rap. Interestingly, mutagenesis of the Ras GAP arginine finger, and surrounding residues important in Ras binding, inhibit both Ras and Rap GAP activity of GAP1(IP4BP). Although the precise details by which GAP1(IP4BP) can function as a Rap GAP remain to be determined, these data are consistent with Rap associating with GAP1(IP4BP) through the Ras-binding site within the Ras GAP domain. Finally, we have established that such dual Ras/Rap GAP activity is not restricted to GAP1(IP4BP). Although GAP1(m) appears to constitute a specific Ras GAP, CAPRI and RASAL display dual activity. For CAPRI, its Rap GAP activity is modulated upon its Ca(2+)-induced association with the plasma membrane.     

Differential actions of p60c-Src and Lck kinases on the Ras regulators p120-GAP and GDP/GTP exchange factor CDC25Mm.

It is known that the human Ras GTPase activating protein (GAP) p120-GAP can be phosphorylated by different members of the Src kinase family and recently phosphorylation of the GDP/GTP exchange factor (GEF) CDC25Mm/GRF1 by proteins of the Src kinase family has been revealed in vivo [Kiyono, M., Kaziro, Y. & Satoh, T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5441-5446]. As it still remains unclear how these phosphorylations can influence the Ras pathway we have analyzed the ability of p60c-Src and Lck to phosphorylate these two Ras regulators and have compared the activity of the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms. Both kinases were found to phosphorylate full-length or truncated forms of GAP and GEF. The use of the catalytic domain of p60c-Src showed that its SH3/SH2 domains are not required for the interaction and the phosphorylation of both regulators. Remarkably, the phosphorylations by the two kinases were accompanied by different functional effects. The phosphorylation of p120-GAP by p60c-Src inhibited its ability to stimulate the Ha-Ras-GTPase activity, whereas phosphorylation by Lck did not display any effect. A different picture became evident with CDC25Mm; phosphorylation by Lck increased its capacity to stimulate the GDP/GTP exchange on Ha-Ras, whereas its phosphorylation by p60c-Src was ineffective. Our results suggest that phosphorylation by p60c-Src and Lck is a selective process that can modulate the activity of p120-GAP and CDC25Mm towards Ras proteins.     

C1, see them all

Recent structural analysis of crystalline beta2-chimaerin shows the central protein kinase C-like, diacylglycerol (DAG)-binding C1 domain to be masked by its intramolecular interactions with the N-terminal SH2 and GAP domains, and linker regions. A mechanism of activation has been derived from modelling of a GAP-Rac GTPase complex--the auto-inhibitory constraints are released via membrane engagement, unmasking the C1 domain to enable DAG binding and subsequent GAP stimulation of Rac GTPase catalytic activity.     

Binding of the H-ras p21 GTPase activating protein by the activated epidermal growth factor receptor leads to inhibition of the p21 GTPase activity in vitro.

There is strong, albeit indirect, evidence for a mitogenic signal transduction pathway comprising growth factors, growth factor receptors, the GTPase activating protein (p120-GAP), and p21ras. To demonstrate a direct physical association between these proteins in the absence of other cell constituents, their interaction was studied in vitro. Our results obtained with homogeneous protein preparations show that the activated epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor phosphorylates p120-GAP at one site. Phosphorylated p120-GAP remains firmly bound to the receptor at physiological salt concentration; this leads to product inhibition of the receptor kinase activity as shown by diminished autophosphorylation activity and lack of turnover in p120-GAP phosphorylation. Phosphorylated p120-GAP is as active in stimulating the p21ras.GTPase as unphosphorylated GAP. p120-GAP, however, when bound to the EGF receptor is by a factor of 2 less active in stimulating the p21ras.GTPase than free p120-GAP. This effect might contribute to regulate the steady-state level of p21-GTP.     

Rap-specific GTPase activating protein follows an alternative mechanism.

Rap1 is a small GTPase that is involved in signal transduction cascades. It is highly homologous to Ras but it is down-regulated by its own set of GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). To investigate the mechanism of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction catalyzed by Rap1GAP, a catalytically active fragment was expressed in Escherichia coli and characterized by kinetic and mutagenesis studies. The GTPase reaction of Rap1 is stimulated 10(5)-fold by Rap1GAP and has a k(cat) of 6 s(-1) at 25 degrees C. The catalytic effect of GAPs from Ras, Rho, and Rabs depends on a crucial arginine which is inserted into the active site. However, all seven highly conserved arginines of Rap1GAP can be mutated without dramatically reducing V(max) of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction. We found instead two lysines whose mutations reduce catalysis 25- and 100-fold, most likely by an affinity effect. Rap1GAP does also not supply the crucial glutamine that is missing in Rap proteins at position 61. The Rap1(G12V) mutant which in Ras reduces catalysis 10(6)-fold is shown to be efficiently down-regulated by Rap1GAP. As an alternative, Rap1(F64A) is shown by kinetic and cell biological studies to be a Rap1GAP-resistant mutant. This study supports the notion of a completely different mechanism of the Rap1GAP-catalyzed GTP-hydrolysis reaction on Rap1.     

Regulation of Rap1 activity by RapGAP1 controls cell adhesion at the front of chemotaxing cells

Spatial and temporal regulation of Rap1 is required for proper myosin assembly and cell adhesion during cell migration in Dictyostelium discoideum. Here, we identify a Rap1 guanosine triphosphatase–activating protein (GAP; RapGAP1) that helps mediate cell adhesion by negatively regulating Rap1 at the leading edge. Defects in spatial regulation of the cell attachment at the leading edge in rapGAP1⁻ (null) cells or cells overexpressing RapGAP1 (RapGAP1^OE) lead to defective chemotaxis. rapGAP1⁻ cells have extended chemoattractant-mediated Rap1 activation kinetics and decreased MyoII assembly, whereas RapGAP1^OE cells show reciprocal phenotypes. We see that RapGAP1 translocates to the cell cortex in response to chemoattractant stimulation and localizes to the leading edge of chemotaxing cells via an F-actin–dependent pathway. RapGAP1 localization is negatively regulated by Ctx, an F-actin bundling protein that functions during cytokinesis. Loss of Ctx leads to constitutive and uniform RapGAP1 cortical localization. We suggest that RapGAP1 functions in the spatial and temporal regulation of attachment sites through MyoII assembly via regulation of Rap1–guanosine triphosphate.     

Rsr1 and Rap1 GTPases are activated by the same GTPase-activating protein and require threonine 65 for their activation

The Rsr1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to be essential for bud site selection (Bender, A., and Pringle, J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9976-9980). This protein of 272 amino acids shares approximately 50% sequence identity with both Ras and Rap GTPases. However, neither GTP binding nor GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein has been reported. The Rsr1 protein shares with human Rap1 GTPases the four specific motifs, i.e. Gly-12, residues 32-40, Ala-59, and residues 64-70, that are required for GAP3-dependent activation of the Rap1 GTPases. In this paper we demonstrate that the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein is stimulated by GAP3 purified from bovine brain cytosol. The Rsr1 GTPase is not activated by either GAP1 or GAP2 which are specific for the Ras and Rho GTPases, respectively. Thus, it appears that the Rsr1 GTPase is a new member of the Rap1 GTPase family. Replacement of Gly-12 by Val in the Rsr1 GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation. The chimeric GTPases, Ras(1-60)/Rsr1(61-168) and Rsr1(1-65)/Ras(66-189), are activated by GAP3 but not by GAP1. Replacement of Thr-65 by Ser in the latter chimeric GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation, indicating that Thr-65 is required for distinguishing GAP3 from GAP1. We have previously shown that Gln-61 and Ser-65 are sufficient to determine the GAP1 specificity. Replacement of Thr-35 by Ala in the common effector domain (residues 32-40) of the chimeric Ras/Rsr1 GTPases completely abolishes GAP3-dependent activation.