A Positive GATA Element and a Negative Vitamin D Receptor-Like Element Control Atrial Chamber-Specific Expression of a Slow Myosin Heavy-Chain Gene during Cardiac Morphogenesis

We have used the slow myosin heavy chain (MyHC) 3 gene to study the molecular mechanisms that control atrial chamber-specific gene expression. Initially, slow MyHC 3 is uniformly expressed throughout the tubular heart of the quail embryo. As cardiac development proceeds, an anterior-posterior gradient of slow MyHC 3 expression develops, culminating in atrial chamber-restricted expression of this gene following chamberization. Two cis elements within the slow MyHC 3 gene promoter, a GATA-binding motif and a vitamin D receptor (VDR)-like binding motif, control chamber-specific expression. The GATA element of the slow MyHC 3 is sufficient for expression of a heterologous reporter gene in both atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, and expression of GATA-4, but not Nkx2-5 or myocyte enhancer factor 2C, activates reporter gene expression in fibroblasts. Equivalent levels of GATA-binding activity were found in extracts of atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes from embryonic chamberized hearts. These observations suggest that GATA factors positively regulate slow MyHC 3 gene expression throughout the tubular heart and subsequently in the atria. In contrast, an inhibitory activity, operating through the VDR-like element, increased in ventricular cardiomyocytes during the transition of the heart from a tubular to a chambered structure. Overexpression of the VDR, acting via the VDR-like element, duplicates the inhibitory activity in ventricular but not in atrial cardiomyocytes. These data suggest that atrial chamber-specific expression of the slow MyHC 3 gene is achieved through the VDR-like inhibitory element in ventricular cardiomyocytes at the time distinct atrial and ventricular chambers form.     

Cross-talk between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and transforming growth factor-beta signaling requires binding of VDR and Smad3 proteins to their cognate DNA recognition elements

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (vitamin D) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) regulate diverse biological processes including cell proliferation and differentiation through modulation of the expression of target genes. Members of the Smad family of proteins function as effectors of TGF-beta signaling pathways whereas the vitamin D receptor (VDR) confers vitamin D signaling. We investigated the molecular mechanisms by which TGF-beta and vitamin D signaling pathways interact in the regulation of the human osteocalcin promoter. Synergistic activation of the osteocalcin gene promoter by TGF-beta and vitamin D was observed in transient transfection experiments. However, in contrast to a previous report by Yanagisawa, J., Yanagi, Y., Masuhiro, Y., Suzawa, M., Watanabe, M., Kashiwagi, K., Toriyabe, T., Kawabata, M., Miyazono, K., and Kato, S. (1999) Science, 283, 1317-1321, synergistic activation was not detectable when the osteocalcin vitamin D response element (VDRE) alone was linked to a heterologous promoter. Inclusion of the Smad binding elements (SBEs) with the VDRE in the heterologous promoter restored synergistic activation. Furthermore, this synergy was dependent on the spacing between VDRE and SBEs. The Smad3-Smad4 heterodimer was found to bind in gel shift assay to two distinct DNA segments of the osteocalcin promoter: -1030 to -989 (SBE3) and -418 to -349 (SBE1). Deletion of SBE1, which is proximal to the VDRE, but not the distal SBE3 in this promoter reporter abolished TGF-beta responsiveness and eliminated synergistic co-activation with vitamin D. Thus the molecular mechanism, whereby Smad3 and VDR mediate cross-talk between the TGF-beta and vitamin D signaling pathways, requires both a VDRE and a SBE located in close proximity to the target promoter.     

Molecular basis of the selective activity of vitamin D analogues

More than 2,000 synthetic analogues of the biological active form of vitamin D, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)), are presently known. Basically, all of them interfere with the molecular switch of nuclear 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) signaling, which is the complex of the vitamin D receptor (VDR), the retinoid X receptor (RXR), and a 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) response element (VDRE). Central element of this molecular switch is the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the VDR, which can be stabilized by a 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogue either in its agonistic, antagonistic, or non-agonistic conformation. The positioning of helix 12 of the LBD is of most critical importance for these conformations. In each of the three conformations, the VDR performs different protein-protein interactions, which then result in a characteristic functional profile. Most 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogues have been identified as agonists, a few are antagonists (e.g., ZK159222 and TEI-9647), and only Gemini and some of its derivatives act under restricted conditions as non-agonists. The functional profile of some 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) analogues, such as EB1089 and Gemini, can be modulated by protein and DNA interaction partners of the VDR. This provides them with some selectivity for DNA-dependent and -independent signaling pathways and VDRE structures.     

Transrepression by a liganded nuclear receptor via a bHLH activator through co-regulator switching

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is essential for ligand-induced gene repression of 25(OH)D3 1alpha-hydroxylase (1alpha(OH)ase) in mammalian kidney, while this gene expression is activated by protein kinase A (PKA) signaling downstream of the parathyroid hormone action. The mapped negative vitamin D response element (1alphanVDRE) in the human 1alpha(OH)ase gene promoter (around 530 bp) was distinct from those of the reported DR3-like nVDREs, composed of two E-box-like motifs. Unlike the reported nVDREs, no direct binding of VDR/RXR heterodimer to 1alphanVDRE was detected. A bHLH-type factor, designated VDIR, was identified as a direct sequence-specific activator of 1nVDRE. The transactivation function of VDIR was further potentiated by activated-PKA signaling through phosphorylation of serine residues in the transactivation domains, with the recruitment of a p300 histone acetyltransferase co-activator. The ligand-dependent association of VDR/RXR heterodimer with VDIR bound to 1alphanVDRE caused the dissociation of p300 co-activators from VDIR, and the association of HDAC co-repressor complex components resulting in ligand-induced transrepression. Thus, the present study deciphers a novel mechanism of ligand-induced transrepression by nuclear receptor via co-regulator switching.     

Vitamin D receptor interactions with positive and negative DNA response elements: an interference footprint comparison

Interference footprinting protocols were utilized to examine the interactions of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) with either a positive or a negative vitamin D response element (VDRE). A sequence from the human osteocalcin (hOC) gene was chosen for the prototypical positive DR+3 VDRE, while an analogous sequence linked to the avian parathyroid hormone gene (aPTH) was used as the negative VDRE. Both types of response elements were examined for phosphate backbone contacts, as well as base-specific interactions with guanine and thymine residues. Sources of VDR included partially purified canine intestinal preparations, as well as extracts of recombinant human VDR and retinoid X receptor alpha prepared from baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells. Cold competition experiments using variable amounts of these oligonucleotides in the mobility shift assay revealed that the hOC element was a five-fold better competitor for heterodimer complex binding than the negative VDRE. Interference footprints revealed extensive strong contacts to the phosphate backbone and individual guanine and thymine nucleotides of the hOC element. The composite hOC footprint was asymmetric for the number and strength of interactions observed over each of the respective direct repeat half-sites. In contrast, the aPTH VDRE footprints revealed fewer points of DNA contact that were limited to the hexanucleotide repeat regions and were strikingly weaker in nature. The alignment of DNA contact points for both elements produced a 5' stagger that was indicative of successive major groove interactions, and consistent with dimer binding. DNA helical representations indicate that the heterodimer contacts to these response elements are substantially different and provide insight into functional aspects of each complex.