Two extended arrays of a satellite DNA sequence at the centromere and at the short-arm telomere of Chinese hamster chromosome 5

We have cloned a Chinese hamster chromosome-specific repeated sequence (SatCH5). This satellite is composed of a 33-bp unit organized in two extended tandem arrays. It is localized at the centromere and at the short-arm subtelomere of chromosome 5. Altogether, SatCH5 covers about 1-2 Mb per diploid genome and is not present in other species, including the Syrian hamster and mouse. Since it is known in the Chinese hamster and numerous other vertebrate species that telomeric (TTAGGG)n repeats are localized at the centromeres of several chromosomes, we studied the localization of SatCH5 relative to (TTAGGG)n sequences. Using two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization on stretched chromosomes and on DNA fibers, we have shown that at the centromere of chromosome 5 SatCH5 and the (TTAGGG)n arrays are contiguous. SatCH5 is the first chromosome-specific repetitive sequence located at both the pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions of the same chromosome.     

Comparative genomic structure of human, dog, and cat MHC: HLA, DLA, and FLA

Comparisons of the genomic structure of 3 mammalian major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs), human HLA, canine DLA, and feline FLA revealed remarkable structural differences between HLA and the other 2 MHCs. The 4.6-Mb HLA sequence was compared with the 3.9-Mb DLA sequence from 2 supercontigs generated by 7x whole-genome shotgun assembly and 3.3-Mb FLA draft sequence. For FLA, we confirm that 1) feline FLA was split into 2 pieces within the TRIM (member of the tripartite motif) gene family found in human HLA, 2) class II, III, and I regions were placed in the pericentromeric region of the long arm of chromosome B2, and 3) the remaining FLA was located in subtelomeric region of the short arm of chromosome B2. The exact same chromosome break was found in canine DLA structure, where class II, III, and I regions were placed in a pericentromeric region of chromosome 12 whereas the remaining region was located in a subtelomeric region of chromosome 35, suggesting that this chromosome break occurred once before the split of felid and canid more than 55 million years ago. However, significant differences were found in the content of genes in both pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions in DLA and FLA, the gene number, and amplicon structure of class I genes plus 2 other class I genes found on 2 additional chromosomes; canine chromosomes 7 and 18 suggest the dynamic nature in the evolution of MHC class I genes.     

Modulation of telomere length dynamics by the subtelomeric region of tetrahymena telomeres

Tetrahymena telomeres usually consist of approximately 250 base pairs of T(2)G(4) repeats, but they can grow to reach a new length set point of up to 900 base pairs when kept in log culture at 30 degrees C. We have examined the growth profile of individual macronuclear telomeres and have found that the rate and extent of telomere growth are affected by the subtelomeric region. When the sequence of the rDNA subtelomeric region was altered, we observed a decrease in telomere growth regardless of whether the GC content was increased or decreased. In both cases, the ordered structure of the subtelomeric chromatin was disrupted, but the effect on the telomeric complex was relatively minor. Examination of the telomeres from non-rDNA chromosomes showed that each telomere exhibited a unique and characteristic growth profile. The subtelomeric regions from individual chromosome ends did not share common sequence elements, and they each had a different chromatin structure. Thus, telomere growth is likely to be regulated by the organization of the subtelomeric chromatin rather than by a specific DNA element. Our findings suggest that at each telomere the telomeric complex and subtelomeric chromatin cooperate to form a unique higher order chromatin structure that controls telomere length.     

Using a pericentromeric interspersed repeat to recapitulate the phylogeny and expansion of human centromeric segmental duplications

Despite considerable advances in sequencing of the human genome over the past few years, the organization and evolution of human pericentromeric regions have been difficult to resolve. This is due, in part, to the presence of large, complex blocks of duplicated genomic sequence at the boundary between centromeric satellite and unique euchromatic DNA. Here, we report the identification and characterization of an approximately 49-kb repeat sequence that exists in more than 40 copies within the human genome. This repeat is specific to highly duplicated pericentromeric regions with multiple copies distributed in an interspersed fashion among a subset of human chromosomes. Using this interspersed repeat (termed PIR4) as a marker of pericentromeric DNA, we recovered and sequence-tagged 3 Mb of pericentromeric DNA from a variety of human chromosomes as well as nonhuman primate genomes. A global evolutionary reconstruction of the dispersal of PIR4 sequence and analysis of flanking sequence supports a model in which pericentromeric duplications initiated before the separation of the great ape species (>12 MYA). Further, analyses of this duplication and associated flanking duplications narrow the major burst of pericentromeric duplication activity to a time just before the divergence of the African great ape and human species (5 to 7 MYA). These recent duplication exchange events substantially restructured the pericentromeric regions of hominoid chromosomes and created an architecture where large blocks of sequence are shared among nonhomologous chromosomes. This report provides the first global view of the series of historical events that have reshaped human pericentromeric regions over recent evolutionary time.     

Comparative study of human chromosome replication in primary cultures of embryonic fibroblasts and in cultures of peripheral blood leucocytes

By autoradiography with ³H-thymidine and ³H-deoxycytidine it is shown that chromosomes 1 and 16 in cultures of embryonic fibroblasts at the termination of the S period synthesise AT- and GC-rich DNA at different rats: in both chromosomes the labelling of AT-bases is more intensive. In leucocyte cultures both nucleotide pairs label equally in these chromosomes. Chromosomes 2, 3, 4–5 and 21–22 are labelled equally in both cultures with respect to AT-and GC-pairs. Fibroblasts and leucocytes differ in the relative intensity of DNA synthesis at the end of the S period: chromosomes 1,16 and 21–22 contain more label in the case of fibroblasts (chromosome 1 solely due to AT-pairs) and chromosome 4–5 in the case of leucocytes. Analysis of distribution of late label along chromosome 1 showed that in fibroblast cultures the pericentromeric regions of both arms are labelled more intensively in respect to both nucleotide pairs than in leucocyte cultures. Both in fibroblast and leucocyte cultures no significant distinctions in the distribution of AT-and GC-pairs along chromosome 2 were established. In fibroblast cultures the pericentromeric regions of both arms of chromosome 3 are labelled more intensively than other regions. In leucocyte cultures the pericentromeric region of the short arm of this chromosome is labelled with the same intensively as in fibroblasts, whereas in the pericentromeric region of the long arm the intensity of incorporation of labelled synthesis precursors decreases. — Analysis of results obtained in the present study together with data of previous studied (Slesinger et al., 1974; Lozovskaya et al., 1976; Lozovskaya et al., 1977) shows that differences between the two types of cells in the intensity of late ³H-thymidine labelling in the C-heterochromatin regions of chromosomes 1 and 16 may be explained both by variation of replication time in leucocytes as compared with fibroblasts and by variation of the content of AT- rich DNA. Differences observed in other chromosomes are probably due to different times of replication of these chromosomes in leucocytes and fibroblasts. — Thus, the process of cell system differentiation involves not only differential activity of the genome (the main mechanism) that is connected with differences in the replication time of chromosomes and of their regions but also variation of the quantity of genetic material.     

Sequence of centromere separation: influence of pericentromeric heterochromatin (repetitive DNA) inMus

A relationship between the sequence of centromere separation and quantity of pericentromeric constitutive heterochromatin was studied using bone marrow cells ofMus musculus molossinus and three cell lines, viz., SEWA-Rec 4, brain tumor and L-cells, ofM. m. domesticus origin. The timing of separation of a centromere into two daughter centromeres is related to the quantity of pericentromeric heterochromatin. In these genomes, having qualitatively uniform DNA in their heterochromatin fraction, the chromosomes with none or small quantities of heterochromatin separate first. These are followed by those chromosomes which have increasingly larger quantities of heterochromatin. It appears that one function of repetitive DNA (pericentromeric heterochromatin) is to regulate the timing of separation of centromeres.     

Structure and variability of human chromosome ends.

Mammalian telomeres are thought to be composed of a tandem array of TTAGGG repeats. To further define the type and arrangement of sequences at the ends of human chromosomes, we developed a direct cloning strategy for telomere-associated DNA. The method involves a telomere enrichment procedure based on the relative lack of restriction endonuclease cutting sites near the ends of human chromosomes. Nineteen (TTAGGG)n-bearing plasmids were isolated, two of which contain additional human sequences proximal to the telomeric repeats. These telomere-flanking sequences detect BAL 31-sensitive loci and thus are located close to chromosome ends. One of the flanking regions is part of a subtelomeric repeat that is present at 10 to 25% of the chromosome ends in the human genome. This sequence is not conserved in rodent DNA and therefore should be a helpful tool for physical characterization of human chromosomes in human-rodent hybrid cell lines; some of the chromosomes that may be analyzed in this manner have been identified, i.e., 7, 16, 17, and 21. The minimal size of the subtelomeric repeat is 4 kilobases (kb); it shows a high frequency of restriction fragment length polymorphisms and undergoes extensive de novo methylation in somatic cells. Distal to the subtelomeric repeat, the chromosomes terminate in a long region (up to 14 kb) that may be entirely composed of TTAGGG repeats. This terminal segment is unusually variable. Although sperm telomeres are 10 to 14 kb long, telomeres in somatic cells are several kilobase pairs shorter and very heterogeneous in length. Additional telomere reduction occurs in primary tumors, indicating that somatic telomeres are unstable and may continuously lose sequences from their termini.     

The evolutionary origin of human subtelomeric homologies--or where the ends begin

The subtelomeric regions of human chromosomes are comprised of sequence homologies shared between distinct subsets of chromosomes. In the course of developing a set of unique human telomere clones, we identified many clones containing such shared homologies, characterized by the presence of cross-hybridization signals on one or more telomeres in a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. We studied the evolutionary origin of seven subtelomeric clones by performing comparative FISH analysis on a primate panel that included great apes and Old World monkeys. All clones tested showed a single hybridization site in Old World monkeys that corresponded to one of the orthologous human sites, thus indicating the ancestral origin. The timing of the duplication events varied among the subtelomeric regions, from approximately 5 to approximately 25 million years ago. To examine the origin of and mechanism for one of these subtelomeric duplications, we compared the sequence derived from human 2q13--an ancestral fusion site of two great ape telomeric regions--with its paralogous subtelomeric sequences at 9p and 22q. These paralogous regions share large continuous homologies and contain three genes: RABL2B, forkhead box D4, and COBW-like. Our results provide further evidence for subtelomeric-mediated genomic duplication and demonstrate that these segmental duplications are most likely the result of ancestral unbalanced translocations that have been fixed in the genome during recent primate evolution.     

In situ DNA sequence mapping with surface-spread mouse pachytene chromosomes

Surface-spread pachytene chromosomes are several times the length of metaphase chromosomes and the decondensed chromatin loops are attached to a well-defined axis (Weith and Traut, 1980). This arrangement permits detailed DNA sequence localization by in situ hybridization. We show that two probes to low-frequency repeated sequences (20 to 50 copies) which locate the centromere proximal in the mouse X metaphase chromosome between bands A1 and A3 (Disteche et al., 1985) and which map 5.5 cM apart (Disteche et al., 1989), hybridize to two distinct chromatin regions 3 to 5 microns apart on a 25 microns long pachytene X chromosome core.     

Beginning at the end: DNA replication within the telomere

Using single molecule analysis of replicated DNA (SMARD), Drosopoulos et al. (2015; J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201410061) report that DNA replication initiates at measurable frequency within the telomere of mouse chromosome arm 14q. They demonstrate that resolution of G4 structures on the G-rich template strand of the telomere requires some overlapping functions of BLM and WRN helicase for leading strand synthesis.Double-strand breaks in DNA can wreak havoc in cells if not repaired. Therefore, it was proposed that the ends of chromosomes may be specialized cap structures that are not recognized as double-strand breaks, thus preventing cell cycle arrest, degradation, and recombinational fusion (Muller, 1938; McClintock, 1939). We now know that telomeres comprise the ends of chromosomes and are essential for genome stability. Telomeres are composed of tandem head-to-tail repeats of a short G-rich sequence; for example, human telomeres are 2–20 kb of (TTAGGG)_n repeats. The chromosome ends are not blunt, and the 3′ end (G-rich strand) overhangs in a single strand that can invade the interior of the telomere to displace the internal G-rich sequence and form a T-loop structure (Griffith et al., 1999; Cesare et al., 2003; Doksani et al., 2013), thus protecting the chromosome ends from being recognized by the cell as double-strand breaks, in addition to protection by proteins that bind the telomere.Eukaryotic chromosomes are duplicated via semiconservative replication with a leading (continuous synthesis for net growth at the 3′ end of the nascent leading strand) and lagging (discontinuous Okazaki fragment synthesis for net growth at the 5′ end of the nascent lagging strand) elongating strand as shown in Fig. 1. In chromosomal semiconservative replication, the short 5′ RNA primer is removed from the nascent strand and the gap is filled in by DNA that is ligated to the adjacent nascent DNA. However, at the end of the chromosome, the gap after removal of the 5′ terminal RNA primer on the lagging strand cannot be filled in, and the chromosome may become shorter with each ensuing round of replication. This has been termed the end-replication problem (Watson, 1972; Olovnikov, 1973), and telomerase helps to solve this problem (Greider and Blackburn, 1987; Soudet et al., 2014).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.DNA replication at the end of chromosomes. (A) DNA replication can initiate within the subtelomeric region with replication forks (green arrows) progressing bidirectionally away from the origin. Telomere DNA is replicated by a replication fork that passes through this region. In each panel, leading nascent strand synthesis is indicated by a blue line with a single arrowhead; lagging nascent strand synthesis is indicated by a blue line with multiple arrowheads. At the top of each panel, the red line indicates the signal seen by microscopy of replication that initiated and continued during administration of the first pulse (IdU, red), and the dotted green line indicates the signal seen for replication extension during the second pulse (CldU, green). (B) On some DNA molecules from mouse chromosome 14q, DNA replication initiates within the telomere itself. In practice, the second (green) pulse was often not observed in the telomere. (C) Partially overlapping functions of BLM and WRN helicases are used to resolve G-quadruplex (G4) DNA (blue structure) that can form on the G-rich parental strand of the telomeres. In cells deficient of BLM and/or WRN helicase, progression of the nascent leading strand in the telomere is impaired; the slowed replication forks are indicated by red arrows. The resulting replication stress is accompanied by activation of dormant replication origins in the subtelomere. The cartoon is not drawn to scale, and the infrequently used subtelomeric replication origin in C is closer to the telomere than the subtelomeric origin in A.Semiconservative replication occurs before the action of telomerase. Previously it was thought that DNA replication began at an origin in chromosomal DNA adjacent to the telomere repeats, with the replication forks moving bidirectionally away from the subtelomeric origin (Fig. 1 A), thus replicating the telomere. However, the question remained whether DNA replication might initiate with some frequency within the telomere itself (Fig. 1 B). This question has now been answered in the affirmative in this issue by Drosopoulos et al., who used single molecule analysis of replicated DNA (SMARD; Norio and Schildkraut, 2001). In this approach, replicating cells are sequentially labeled by two different nucleotide analogues that are subsequently identified by immunofluorescence. For example, in bidirectional replication, red signals from the first pulse will be flanked at each end by green signals from the second pulse. Earlier reports using SMARD had concluded that most replication initiates at subtelomeric regions in the mouse and human genome and rarely in the telomeres themselves (Sfeir et al., 2009; Drosopoulos et al., 2012). In the recent study by Drosopoulos et al. (2015), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes from the telomere region allowed the replication pattern to be analyzed for a 320 kb genomic segment from the end of mouse chromosome arm 14q. Due to the long time (4 h) for the first (red) pulse, usually only red tracts of signal within the telomere were seen, but since many such molecules did not have the red signal extend into the subtelomeric region, it can be comfortably concluded that replication must have initiated within the telomere (Fig. 1 B). Moreover, some molecules did have red signal in the telomere flanked by green signal, supporting this conclusion. Although in these cases there was chromosome-proximal green signal, chromosome-distal green signal was rarely seen. Thus, although there was limited evidence for bidirectional replication originating in the telomere, it is very clear that a replication origin can exist within the telomere proper with a replication fork that extends over time into the subtelomere. It remains to be investigated whether replication initiates at a relatively high frequency in the telomeres of chromosomes other than 14q.These findings raise the question of whether the origin for DNA replication coincides with the simple sequence repeat found in telomeres or instead if it coincides with some other sequence that might be interspersed within the telomere. The former is suggested by a study with Xenopus cell-free extracts that could assemble the pre-replication complex and undergo some DNA replication on exogenous DNA containing exclusively telomeric repeats (Kurth and Gautier, 2010). Similar conclusions that DNA replication can initiate in the simple DNA repeats found in centromeres where replication bubbles have been observed in Drosophila virilis by electron microscopy have been reached (Zakian, 1976), and a recent study suggests that DNA replication initiates within human alpha-satellite DNA (Erliandri et al., 2014).Replications forks move slowly through telomeric DNA (Ivessa et al., 2002; Makovets et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2006; Sfeir et al., 2009) due to the high thermal stability of GC-rich telomeric DNA as well as its propensity to form stable secondary structures, such as G-quadruplex (G4) DNA, which can pose problems for DNA replication (Lopes et al., 2011; Paeschke et al., 2011). Various helicases help solve this problem; for example, Pif1 helicase helps to unwind G4 (Paeschke et al., 2013). Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM) and the Werner syndrome helicase (WRN) have also been implicated in assisting telomere replication: BLM suppresses replication-dependent fragile telomeres (Sfeir et al., 2009), and WRN suppresses defects in telomere lagging strand synthesis (Crabbe et al., 2004). Drosopoulos et al. (2015) now report that leading strand synthesis that initiates within the telomere has a slower rate of progression into the subtelomere in BLM-deficient cells as visualized by SMARD. Moreover, there was a higher frequency of replication initiation in the 14q subtelomere of the BLM-deficient cells, originating closer to the telomere than in BLM-proficient cells. These observations suggest that dormant replication origins in the 14q subtelomere can be activated when fork progression is impeded in BLM-deficient cells (Fig. 1 C). Drosopoulos et al. (2015) also found an increase in subtelomeric replication initiation when replication fork progression from the telomere was hindered by aphidicolin, as an alternate means to activate dormant origins by replication stress. When cells were treated with the G4 stabilizer PhenDC3, 14q subtelomeric origin firing increased further in BLM-deficient cells. Collectively, the data suggest a slowdown of progression of leading strand synthesis from an origin in the 14q telomere (using the G-rich parental strand as the template) when G4 structures cannot be resolved in BLM-deficient cells. As further support for a role of BLM helicase to remove G4 structures, there was increased staining in BLM-deficient cells by the BG4 antibody (Biffi et al., 2013) against G4 in the whole genome and especially in telomeres.WRN helicase can unwind G4 in vitro (Fry and Loeb, 1999; Mohaghegh et al., 2001). When Drosopoulos et al. (2015) used SMARD to analyze replication in cells doubly deficient of both BLM and WRN, they found a marked decrease of red replication signal in 14q telomeres, suggesting some functional overlap between BLM and WRN with regard to leading strand synthesis off the G-rich strand of telomeres. Supporting this conclusion, there was more G4 staining by the BG4 antibody in cells doubly deficient of both BLM and WRN than in cells deficient of just BLM or just WRN. This is the first direct demonstration in vivo of a contribution of BLM and WRN helicases in the resolution of G4 structures, which is especially needed for progression of leading strand synthesis that initiates in telomeres and is copied from the G-rich strand.     

Human telomeres replicate using chromosome-specific, rather than universal, replication programs

Telomeric and adjacent subtelomeric heterochromatin pose significant challenges to the DNA replication machinery. Little is known about how replication progresses through these regions in human cells. Using single molecule analysis of replicated DNA (SMARD), we delineate the replication programs-i.e., origin distribution, termination site location, and fork rate and direction-of specific telomeres/subtelomeres of individual human chromosomes in two embryonic stem (ES) cell lines and two primary somatic cell types. We observe that replication can initiate within human telomere repeats but was most frequently accomplished by replisomes originating in the subtelomere. No major delay or pausing in fork progression was detected that might lead to telomere/subtelomere fragility. In addition, telomeres from different chromosomes from the same cell type displayed chromosome-specific replication programs rather than a universal program. Importantly, although there was some variation in the replication program of the same telomere in different cell types, the basic features of the program of a specific chromosome end appear to be conserved.     

Telomere-homologous sequences occur near the centromeres of many tomato chromosomes

Several bacteriophage lambda clones containinginterstitialtelomererepeats (ITR) were isolated from a library of tomato genomic DNA by plaque hybridization with the clonedArabidopsis thaliana telomere repeat. Restriction fragments lacking highly repetitive DNA were identified and used as probes to map 14 of the 20 lambda clones. All of these markers mapped near the centromere on eight of the twelve tomato chromosomes. The exact centromere location of chromosomes 7 and 9 has recently been determined, and all ITR clones that localize to these two chromosomes map to the marker clusters known to contain the centromere. High-resolution mapping of one of these markers showed cosegregation of the telomere repeat with the marker cluster closest to the centromere in over 9000 meiotic products. We propose that the map location of interstitial telomere clones may reflect specific sequence interchanges between telomeric and centromeric regions and may provide an expedient means of localizing centromere positions.     

An interspersed repeated sequence specific for human subtelomeric regions.

A family of DNA loci (DNF28) from the pseudoautosomal region of the human sex chromosomes is characterized by a repeated element (STIR: subtelomeric interspersed repeat) which detects homologous sequences in the telomeric regions of human autosomes by in situ hybridization. Several STIR elements from both the pseudoautosomal region and terminal parts of autosomes were cloned and sequenced. A conserved 350 bp sequence and some characteristic structural differences between the autosomal and pseudoautosomal STIRs were observed. Screening of the DNA sequence databases with a consensus sequence revealed the presence of STIRs in several human loci localized in the terminal parts of different chromosomes. We mapped single copy probes flanking the cloned autosomal STIRs to the subtelomeric parts of six different chromosomes by in situ hybridization and genetic linkage analysis. The linkage data show a greatly increased recombination frequency in the subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes, especially in male meiosis. The STIR elements, specifically located in subtelomeric regions, could play a role in the peculiar recombination properties of these chromosomal regions, e.g. by promoting initiation of pairing at meiosis.     

Investigation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a cloning host for human telomere and alphoid DNA

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sch. pombe) has been proposed as a possible cloning host for both mammalian artificial chromosomes (MACs) and mammalian genomic libraries, due to the large size of its chromosomes and its similarity to higher eukaryotic cells. Here, it was investigated for its ability to form telomeres from human telomere sequence and to stably maintain long stretches of alphoid DNA. Using linear constructs terminating in the telomere repeat, T2AG3, human telomere DNA was shown to efficiently seed telomere formation in Sch. pombe. Much of the human telomeric sequence was removed on addition of Sch. pombe telomeric sequence, a process similar to that described in S. cerevisiae. To investigate the stability of alphoid DNA in fission yeast, bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) containing 130 and 173 kb of alphoid DNA were retrofitted with the Sch. pombe ars1 element and ura4+ marker using Cre-lox recombination. These alphoid BACs were found to be highly unstable in Sch. pombe deleting down to less than 40 kb, whilst control BACs of 96 and 202 kb, containing non-repetitive DNA, were unrearranged. Alphoid DNA has been shown to be sufficient for human centromere function, and this marked instability excludes Sch. pombe as a useful cloning host for mammalian artificial chromosomes. In addition, regions containing repetitive DNA from mammalian genomes may not be truly represented in libraries constructed in Sch. pombe.     

A new gypsy-type retrotransposon, RIRE7: preferential insertion into the tandem repeat sequence TrsD in pericentromeric heterochromatin regions of rice chromosomes

A portion of an insertion sequence present in a member of the RIRE3 family of retrotransposons in Oryza sativa L. cv. IR36 was found to have an LTR sequence followed by a PBS sequence complementary to the 3'-end region of tRNAMet, indicative of another rice retrotransposon (named RIRE7). Cloning and sequencing of PCR-amplified fragments that made up all parts of the RIRE7 sequence showed that RIRE7 is a gypsy-type retrotransposon with partial homology in the pol region to the rice gypsy-type retrotransposons RIRE2 and RIRE3 identified in rice previously. Interestingly, various portions of the RIRE7 sequence were homologous to several DNA segments present in the centromere regions of cereal chromosomes. Further cloning and nucleotide sequencing of fragments flanking RIRE7 copies showed that RIRE7 was inserted into a site within a tandem repeat sequence that has a unit length of 155 bp. The tandem repeat sequence, named TrsD, was homologous to tandem repeat sequences RCS2 and CentC, previously identified in the centromeric regions of rice and maize chromosomes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the metaphase chromosomes of O. sativa cv. Nipponbare showed that both RIRE7 and TrsD sequences were present in the centromere regions of the chromosomes. The presence of RIRE7 and the TrsD sequences in the centromere regions of several chromosomes was confirmed by the identification of several YAC clones whose chromosomal locations are known. Further FISH analysis of rice pachytene chromosomes showed that the TrsD sequences were located in a pericentromeric heterochromatin region. These findings strongly suggest that RIRE7 and TrsD are components of the pericentromeric heterochromatin of rice chromosomes.     

Identification of centromeric and telomeric DNA‐binding proteins in rice

Centromeres and telomeres are DNA/protein complexes and essential functional components of eukaryotic chromosomes. Previous studies have shown that rice centromeres and telomeres are occupied by CentO (rice centromere satellite DNA) satellite and G‐rich telomere repeats, respectively. However, the protein components are not fully understood. DNA‐binding proteins associated with centromeric or telomeric DNAs will most likely be important for the understanding of centromere and telomere structure and functions. To capture DNA‐specific binding proteins, affinity pull‐down technique was applied in this study to isolate rice centromeric and telomeric DNA‐binding proteins. Fifty‐five proteins were identified for their binding affinity to rice CentO repeat, and 80 proteins were identified for their binding to telomere repeat. One CentO‐binding protein, Os02g0288200, was demonstrated to bind to CentO specifically by in vitro assay. A conserved domain, DUF573 with unknown functions was identified in this protein, and proven to be responsible for the specific binding to CentO in vitro. Four proteins identified as telomere DNA‐binding proteins in this study were reported by different groups previously. These results demonstrate that DNA affinity pull‐down technique is effective in the isolation of sequence‐specific binding proteins and will be applicable in future studies of centromere and telomere proteins.     

CENH3 morphogenesis reveals dynamic centromere associations during synaptonemal complex formation and the progression through male meiosis in hexaploid wheat

During meiosis, centromeres in some species undergo a series of associations, but the processes and progression to homologous pairing is still a matter of debate. Here, we aimed to correlate meiotic centromere dynamics and early telomere behaviour to the progression of synaptonemal complex (SC) construction in hexaploid wheat (2n = 42) by triple immunolabelling of CENH3 protein marking functional centromeres, and SC proteins ASY1 (unpaired lateral elements) and ZYP1 (central elements in synapsed chromosomes). We show that single or multiple centromere associations formed in meiotic interphase undergo a progressive polarization (clustering) at the nuclear periphery in early leptotene, leading to formation of the telomere bouquet. Critically, immunolabelling shows the dynamics of these presynaptic centromere associations and a structural reorganization of the centromeric chromatin coinciding with key events of synapsis initiation from the subtelomeric regions. As short stretches of subtelomeric synapsis emerged at early zygotene, centromere clusters lost their strong polarization, gradually resolving as individual centromeres indicated by more than 21 CENH3 foci associated with unpaired lateral elements. Only following this centromere depolarization were homologous chromosome arms connected, as observed by the alignment and fusion of interstitial ZYP1 loci elongating at zygotene so synapsis at centromeres is a continuation of the interstitial synapsis. Our results thus reveal that centromere associations are a component of the timing and progression of chromosome synapsis, and the gradual release of the individual centromeres from the clusters correlates with the elongation of interstitial synapsis between the corresponding homologues.     

Characterization of telomere-subtelomere junctions in <Emphasis Type="Italic"> Silene latifolia</Emphasis>

Telomere-associated regions represent boundaries between the relatively homogeneous telomeres and the subtelomeres, which show much greater heterogeneity in chromatin structure and DNA composition. Although a major fraction of subtelomeres is usually formed by a limited number of highly repeated DNA sequence families, their mutual arrangement, attachment to telomeres and the presence of interspersed unique or low-copy-number sequences make these terminal domains chromosome specific. In this study, we describe the structures of junctions between telomeres and a major subtelomeric repeat of the plant Silene latifolia, X43.1. Our results show that on individual chromosome arms, X43.1 is attached to the telomere either directly at sites corresponding to nucleosome boundaries previously mapped in this sequence, or via other spacer sequences, both previously characterized and newly described ones. Sites of telomere junctions are non-random in all the telomere-associated sequences analysed. These data obtained at the molecular level have been verified using in situ hybridization to metaphase chromosomes and extended DNA fibres.     

A subtelomeric satellite DNA family isolated from the genome of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia.

In an ongoing effort to trace the evolution of the sex chromosomes of Silene latifolia, we have searched for the existence of repetitive sequences specific to these chromosomes in the genome of this species by direct isolation from low-melting agarose gels of satellite DNA bands generated by digestion with restriction enzymes. Five monomeric units belonging to a highly repetitive family isolated from Silene latifolia, the SacI family, have been cloned and characterized. The consensus sequence of the repetitive units is 313 bp in length (however, high variability exists for monomer length variants) and 52.9% in AT. Repeating units are tandemly arranged at the subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes in this species. The sequence does not possess direct or inverted sequences of significant length, but short direct repeats are scattered throughout the monomer sequence. Several short sequence motives resemble degenerate monomers of the telomere repeat sequence of plants (TTTAGGG), confirming a tight association between this subtelomeric satellite DNA and the telomere repeats. Our approach in this work confirms that SacI satellite DNA sequences are among the most abundant in the genome of S. latifolia and, on the other hand, that satellite DNA sequences specific of sex chromosomes are absent in this species. This agrees with a sex determination system less cytogenetically diverged from a bisexual state than the system present in other plant species, such as R. acetosa, or at least a lesser degree of differentiation between the sex chromosomes of S. latifolia and the autosomes.