Cardiovascular disease and risk factors: the role of growth hormone

Clinical studies in patients with acromegaly have shown that growth hormone (GH) exerts both short- and long-term effects on the structure and function of the heart. Moreover, chronic growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been associated with impaired cardiac performance, low heart rate and impaired left ventricular systolic function. Exercise capacity in patients with GHD is significantly reduced and in some severely affected individuals, dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure has been reported. GHD has also been associated with a number of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Altered lipoprotein metabolism and elevated fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity are associated with GHD, and the risk of hypertension is increased in GH-deficient men. Subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat mass have also been found to be abnormally high in these patients. These effects may contribute to an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease. GH is therefore an important factor in the development and function of the cardiovascular system. In this paper, the effects of GH on the physiological mechanisms of the cardiovascular system are discussed, including the effect of GHD on cardiovascular disease risk. We will also discuss the effects of long-term GH replacement therapy in this patient population.     

The phenotype of adults with partial growth hormone deficiency

The concept of partial growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is well established within the paediatric setting having been validated against height velocity. In hypopituitary adults, GHD is defined by a peak GH response <3 microg/l to stimulation. This cut-off is arbitrary due to the lack of a biological marker equivalent of height velocity. The majority of normal adults achieve peak GH levels several fold higher than this cut off during stimulation. It can be argued, therefore, that there is a cohort of hypopituitary adults with intermediate peak GH values (3-7 microg/l), who have relatively impaired GH secretion, and for whom the impact of this partial GHD (GH insufficiency, GHI) on biological endpoints is not known. Studies of GHI adults have demonstrated an abnormal body composition, adverse lipid profile, impaired cardiac performance, reduced exercise tolerance and insulin resistance. The severity of these abnormalities lies between GHD adults and normal subjects. Whether these anomalies translate into increased mortality, as observed in GHD hypopituitary adults, is not yet known. Given the presence of similar sequelae in GHI and GHD adults, and the improvements during GH replacement in GHD adults, a randomized placebo-controlled study of GH replacement in GHI patients is warranted.     

Impact of growth hormone status on body composition and the skeleton

Severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) induces a well-defined clinical entity encompassing, amongst the most reported features, abnormalities of body composition, in particular increased fat mass, especially truncal, and reduced lean body mass. The results from virtually all treatment studies are in agreement that GH replacement improves the body composition profile of GHD patients by increasing lean body mass and reducing fat mass. More recently, the observations have been extended to adults with partial GHD, defined by a peak GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia of 3-7 microg/l. These patients exhibit abnormalities of body composition similar in nature to those described in adults with severe GHD; these include an increase in total fat mass of around 3.5 kg and a reduction of lean body mass of around 5.5 kg. The increase in fat mass is predominantly distributed within the trunk. The degree of abnormality of body composition is intermediate between that of healthy subjects and that of adults with GHD. The impact of GH replacement on body composition in adults with GH insufficiency, although predictable, has not been formally documented. The skeleton is another biological endpoint affected by GH status: in adults with severe GHD, low bone mass has been reported using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and other quantitative methodologies. The importance of low bone mass, in any clinical setting, is as a surrogate marker for the future risk of fracture. Several retrospective studies have documented an increased prevalence of fractures in untreated GHD adults. Hypopituitary adults with severe GHD have reduced markers of bone turnover which normalize with GH replacement, indicating that GH, directly or via induction of insulin-like growth factor-I, is intimately involved in skeletal modelling. Whilst the evidence that GH plays an important role in the acquisition of bone mass during adolescence and early adult life is impressive, the impact of GHD acquired later in adulthood is less clear. Recently we examined the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and age in 125 untreated adults with severe GHD using DEXA. A significant positive correlation was observed between BMD (z-scores) and age at all skeletal sites studied. Overall, few patients, except those aged less than 30 years, had significantly reduced bone mass (i.e. a BMD z-score of less than -2); correction of BMD to provide a pseudo-volumetric measure of BMD suggested that reduced stature of the younger patients may explain, at least in part, this higher frequency of subnormal BMD z-scores. Despite normal BMD, however, an increase in fracture prevalence may still be observed in elderly GHD adults as a consequence of increased falls related to muscle weakness and visual field defects.     

Growth hormone secretagogues: the clinical future

Growth hormone (GH) releasing hexapeptide (GHRP)-6 and other peptidergic and non-peptidergic compounds collectively designated GH secretagogues (GHS) are potent releasers of GH in man. Their clinical future may be envisioned in three areas: therapy of GH-deficient (GHD) states, diagnosis of GHD, and non-endocrinological actions. As therapeutic agents and compared with GH itself, GHS have the disadvantage of lower potency but have a more physiological and safer profile of GH secretion. GHS administration could be indicated for states in which medium GH doses have been shown to be effective. As a diagnostic tool, the combined administration of GH releasing hormone plus GHRP-6, both at saturating doses, is currently the most powerful releaser of GH, devoid of side effects and convenient for the patient; it may also be an alternative to the insulin tolerance test for the diagnosis of GHD in adult patients. Their potential action at cardiovascular level is highly promising. Although the clinical future of GH releasing substances is appealing, probably the most relevant contribution has yet to be discovered. Once the endogenous ligand of the GHS receptor is identified, we will have an insight into the real hypothalamic control of GH secretion in man. With this knowledge it is likely that some diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are commonly undertaken will significantly change.     

New paradigms for growth hormone therapy in children

Much has been learned over the last two decades regarding the management of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in children and adolescents. However, significant divergence and debate continue to exist on the ideal approach to the management of GHD. Despite active controversy, several paradigms have recently emerged which should guide the treatment of GHD patients as we head into the new millennium. The primary objectives of GH therapy remain the normalization of height in childhood and the attainment of normal adult height, but the recognition of the metabolic roles of GH define additional therapeutic benefits. A daily subcutaneous injection of recombinant human GH in a dose range of 25-50 microg/kg/day has been established as the mainstay of therapy. Alternative modes of treatment including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GH secretagogues and depot GH have been developed, but evaluation of their clinical utility remains incomplete. Careful monitoring and follow-up of pediatric GHD patients by a pediatric endocrinologist are essential. Accurate determination of height velocity and interval height increases (expressed as the change in height z score) continue to be the most important parameters in monitoring the response to treatment. Monitoring serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 has gained utility in the assurance of compliance and safety, but does not always correlate well with the growth response. A clear role for a biochemical as well as an auxological monitoring approach has nonetheless been established. The comparison of attained growth response to that which has been calculated by various modeling approaches is also becoming a valuable monitoring tool. Significant side effects of GH therapy are quite rare and are easily identified and addressed during close follow-up. Despite previous concerns, it now appears that in the absence of additional risk factors there is no evidence that long-term recipients of GH are at any increased risk of developing diabetes, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, brain tumor recurrence or leukemia. Although GHD may or may not persist into adult life, adult GHD diagnostic criteria and the importance of GH therapy in adult GHD patients have recently been established. Therefore, the pediatric endocrinologist now has a crucial role in guiding the transition to adult GHD management in collaboration with the adult endocrinologist. In the years to come, with the continued investigation and collaborationof experts from around the world, the approach to GH treatment will undoubtedly continue to evolve and improve.     

Neurocognitive function in adults with growth hormone deficiency

The clinical condition of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) as a consequence of pituitary or hypothalamic disease has been associated with reduced cognitive performance. In several studies, neuropsychological assessment has been performed in adults with GHD both before and after growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy. Interpretation of the available data is complicated by the variation in patient selection as well as the neuropsychological tests used in such studies. Most of the available studies indicate that GHD can lead to small, but clinically relevant changes in memory, processing speed and attention. Some of these changes may be reversed by GH replacement, although the number of reliable intervention studies is limited. In addition to the possible clinical relevance of neuropsychological improvement following GH replacement in patients with GHD, the observed findings may be of interest for studies in neurocognitive performance in other conditions associated with changes in the activity of the somatotrophic axis, and in the understanding of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.     

Long-term challenges in growth hormone treatment

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is defined biochemically as a response to hypoglycaemia with a peak GH concentration of less than 5 microg/l. The 'GHD syndrome' is a range of psychological and physical symptoms that are associated with GHD, which include increased central adiposity, decreased bone mineral density, abnormal lipid profiles, decreased cardiovascular performance, reduced lean body mass (LBM), social isolation, depressed mood and increased anxiety. Importantly, the combination of physical and psychological problems can often result in a reduced quality of life. A number of trials have shown that GH replacement therapy can lead to a substantial improvement in GHD associated symptoms. Following up to 12 months of treatment with GH, LBM increased, left ventricular systolic function improved and the mean volume of adipose tissue fell. After only 4 months of treatment, a rise in exercise capacity was recorded, and after 2 years' treatment, isokinetic and isometric muscle strength had normalized in proximal muscle groups. Feelings of well-being and vitality also improved significantly. However, studies on the effects of treatment on insulin sensitivity in GH-deficient patients have had conflicting results. In this paper, we will discuss the long-term consequences of GHD and the effects of GH replacement therapy.     

Defining growth hormone status in adults with hypopituitarism

The identification of adults with severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is not straightforward. The insulin tolerance test remains the gold standard diagnostic test, although other stimuli such as GH-releasing hormone-arginine are gaining acceptance. Insulin-like growth factor-I has a poor diagnostic sensitivity in adult-onset GHD, but is more useful in the subgroup of adults with childhood-onset GHD. Therapeutic developments include increasing recognition of the need to continue GH therapy beyond final height in young adults with severe GHD on retesting. Consensus guidelines have provided a useful algorithm to identify individuals requiring retesting and the number of tests needed. The concept of partial GHD, recognized by paediatric endocrinologists for many years, is being examined in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. Preliminary evidence suggests that this entity is associated with metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities intermediate between those in severe GHD and in healthy controls. It remains to be seen whether this subgroup will derive benefit from GH therapy. To date, therapeutic benefits of GH have been demonstrated only in adults with severe GHD. It is, therefore, imperative that these individuals are unequivocally identified; the diagnosis becomes more uncertain in the presence of obesity, increasing age, and in the absence of additional pituitary hormone deficits.     

Adolescents with childhood-onset GHD: how do we get them to peak bone mass?

The development of osteoporosis, with its attendant risk of fragility fracture, is in part related to the peak bone mass (PBM) achieved in early adulthood. Adolescence is a critical time for the acquisition of bone mass, with around 40% of skeletal mass being accrued during pubertal maturation. Growth hormone (GH) plays an integral role in the achievement of PBM after completion of linear growth, and several recent studies have suggested that GH replacement should continue in individuals with childhood-onset GHD until PBM has been attained - irrespective of the height achieved. In those with severe GHD after growth and pubertal development are complete, a seamless transition of GH therapy into adult life may be preferable to allowing a gap in GH treatment. The 'window of opportunity' concept for achieving PBM will, nevertheless, continue to be challenged by GHD teenagers who may resent the seamless continuation of GH replacement beyond adolescence. Preparation for this possibility should therefore begin during childhood, with all GHD teenagers being encouraged to remain on GH therapy until at least their mid-20s.     

Effects of growth hormone treatment on B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker of heart failure in adults with growth hormone deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) have abnormalities of cardiac structure and function. Growth hormone replacement (GHR) therapy can induce an increase in cardiac mass and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels have been successfully used to identify patients with heart failure and they correlate with both disease severity and prognosis. DESIGN: To investigate the effect of growth hormone replacement on BNP and inflammatory cardiovascular risk factors in adults with GHD we determined NT-proBNP and high sensitive C-reactive protein (CrP) before, 6 and 12 months after GHR. PATIENTS: Thirty adults (14 males, 16 females) with GHD mean age: 41.7+/-14.5 years (range: 17.2 to 75.4 years) were recruited from the German KIMS cohort (Pfizer's International Metabolic Database). RESULTS: During 12 months of GHR, a significant increase of IGF-1 (85.4+/-72.1 VS. 172.0+/-98 mug/dl; p=0.0001; IGF-1 SDS mean+/-SD: -3.85+/-3.09 VS. -0.92+/-1.82) was detectable. Mean baseline NT-proBNP was 112+/-130 pg/ml (range: 7 to 562). Twelve patients had normal BNP, whereas 18 revealed NT-proBNP values corresponding to those of patients with heart failure NYHA classification I (n=10), NYHA II (n=6) and NYHA III (n=2), respectively. Baseline BNP levels correlated significantly (p=0.044) with increased baseline CrP values. After 12 months of GHR, a significant decrease (p=0.001) in NT-proBNP levels mean: 68+/-81 pg/ml (range: 5 to 395) was detectable, associated with an improvement in NYHA performance status in 10 of the 18 with increased baseline NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, approximately two-thirds of patients with GHD have increased NT-proBNP levels which may be useful as screening/diagnostic laboratory parameter for heart failure in such patients. GHR therapy decreases BNP levels in most patients with GHD.     

Determination of insulin-like growth factor-I in the monitoring of growth hormone treatment with respect to efficacy of treatment and side effects: should potential risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer be considered?

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I has proven to be important in the diagnosis of childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). However, the variability of IGF-I should be taken into account before it can be used in a clinical setting. GH replacement therapy in GHD patients increases IGF-I into the normal range, although there is a large variation. Excessively high (supranormal) GH-induced IGF-I levels are associated with increased prevalence of side effects in adults with GHD. Consequently, at most centres, GH doses are titrated according to IGF-I levels in GHD adults. Whether or not this should also be done in children has not been established. Due to the known variability of IGF-I, individual changes in IGF-I must exceed approximately 35% to be sufficiently significant to warrant a dose adjustment. Novel epidemiological studies have suggested that higher IGF-I levels are associated with an increased risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer compared with lower IGF-I levels in otherwise healthy subjects. Consequently, life-time exposure to IGF-I should be considered in all patients treated with GH, and IGF-I should preferably be kept within normal age-related ranges in children as well as in adults.     

Growth hormone and glucose homeostasis

Patients with active acromegaly are insulin-resistant and glucose-intolerant, whereas children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) are insulin-sensitive and may develop fasting hypoglycaemia. Surprisingly, however, hypopituitary adults with unsubstituted GHD tend to be insulin-resistant, which may worsen during GH substitution. During fasting, which may be considered the natural domain for the metabolic effects of GH, the induction of insulin resistance by GH is associated with enhanced lipid oxidation and protein conservation. In this particular context, insulin resistance appears to constitute a favourable metabolic adaptation. The problem is that GH substitution results in elevated circadian GH levels in non-fasting patients. The best way to address this challenge is to employ evening administration of GH and to tailor the dose. Insulin therapy may cause hypoglycaemia and GH substitution may cause hyperglycaemia. Such untoward effects should be minimized by carefully monitoring the individual patient.     

Influence of growth hormone on accretion of bone mass

Growth hormone (GH) exerts important influences on bone metabolism during lifespan. During childhood, GH is a major determinant of acquisition of bone mass and in adult life, GH partly determines the rate of bone remodelling and therefore influences maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD). Insights into the importance of GH in these respects may be obtained by studies of BMD and indices of bone remodelling in GH deficiency (GHD) of adult-onset and childhood-onset. Adult-onset GHD, usually accompanied by other features of hypopituitarism, may be associated with osteopenia and an increased fracture risk. Postulated mechanisms include GHD and gonadal steroid deficiency of unknown duration; glucocorticoid and thyroxine replacement do not appear to exert a major role. GH replacement in adult-onset GHD results in an early increment in indices of bone remodelling which persists for up to 5 years; BMD increases by 0.5-1.0 SD in males and stabilizes in females over this time period. In adolescents with GHD who traditionally discontinue GH at completion of linear growth, BMD is substantially lower than peak bone mass for a young adult population. Studies addressing the effects of continuation of GH after achievement of final height are currently underway and will provide insights into the possible need to continue GH into adult life. Such studies may confirm a role for GH in promoting continued accrual of bone mass and thereby demonstrate that cessation of GH at achievement of final height, by limiting peak bone mass, may predispose to clinically significant osteoporosis in later life. In addition to the potential importance of GH for achievement of peak bone mass, there may be a superimposed accelerated loss of BMD with advancing age similar to the situation observed in adult-onset GHD. To date, this has been difficult to assess in adult GHD of childhood-onset because the relative contributions of low peak bone mass and increased loss of bone in later life could not be distinguished.     

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with childhood-onset GH deficiency: retesting after one year of therapy and at final height

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that many patients treated with growth hormone (GH) during childhood because of idiopathic GH deficiency (GHD) are no longer GH deficient when retested after cessation of GH therapy when final height is achieved. These patients are labelled as transient GHD. We hypothesized that normalization of GH secretion in transient GHD could occur earlier during the course of GH treatment, which could allow earlier cessation of GH treatment. METHODS: In a retrospective study, GH secretion was re-evaluated after cessation of GH treatment at final height in 43 patients diagnosed during childhood as idiopathic GHD (10 with multiple pituitary hormonal deficiencies (MPHD) and 33 with isolated GHD (IsGHD)). In a prospective study, GH secretion was re-assessed after interruption of GH treatment given for 1 year in 18 children with idiopathic GHD (2 MPHD, 16 IsGHD). GH secretion was evaluated by glucagon or insulin stimulation tests. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, all the 10 patients with MPHD and 64% of the 33 patients with IsGHD were still deficient at re-evaluation using the paediatric criteria to define GHD (GH peak <10 ng/ml at provocative test). The proportion of persisting deficiency was greater in patients with complete IsGHD (86%, 12/14 patients) than in patients with partial IsGHD (47%, 9/19 patients). With the criteria proposed in adulthood (GH peak <3 ng/ml), all the 10 patients with MPHD were still considered to be deficient. In contrast, only 15% (5/33 patients) with IsGHD had a maximal GH value <3 ng/ml (36% of the 14 patients with complete IsGHD and none of the 19 patients with partial IsGHD). In the prospective study, after interruption of GH therapy given for 1 year, the 2 patients with MPHD were still GHD at re-evaluation and they resumed GH treatment. Among the 16 patients with IsGHD, 13 (81%) were still deficient (peak response <10 ng/ml) after 1 year. Two of the 3 patients in whom GHD was not confirmed at retesting after 1 year GH showed again a deficient response at second retesting. CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients diagnosed with IsGHD during childhood have a normalized GH secretory capacity when retested during adulthood, early retesting after interruption of GH treatment given for 1 year during childhood does not enable to determine if GH therapy has to be discontinued before cessation of growth.     

Effects of one-year low-dose growth hormone (GH) therapy on body composition, lipid profile and carbohydrate metabolism in young adults with childhood-onset severe GH deficiency confirmed after completion of growth promotion

Introduction: The symptoms of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults include: abnormalities in body composition, unfavourable lipid profile, early atherosclerosis and impaired quality of life. The aim of the study was the selection of patients with confirmed severe GHD from among all the children treated due to GHD, who could benefit from GH therapy continuation in adulthood and the optimization of GH dosage in young adults with severe GHD. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 54 young adults (38 male), age 17.6 +/- 1.5 years, with childhood-onset GHD, who had reached final height. At least 1 month after the GH therapy withdrawal, the second evaluation of GH secretion was performed in all the patients. In 24% of patients, permanent severe GHD (PSGHD) was confirmed, but a group of 9 patients (4 male) was involved in renewed GH therapy. Results: The renewed GH therapy gave positive effects, including a significant increase in fat-free mass and a decrease in fat mass, and a significant decrease in LDL-cholesterol, but connected with an insignificant decrease of HDL-cholesterol serum concentration and improved results of quality of life (QoL) assessment. During the therapy, an insignificant increase of fasting insulin was observed, with no change in fasting glucose and only a slight increase in HbA(1c) percentage. A decrease of insulin sensitivity was also observed, but both insulin secretion and the values of insulin resistance indices still remained within the reference range. Conclusions: The observed positive effects on body composition, lipid metabolism and QoL, together with the absence of adverse events, confirm the indications for GH therapy in young adults with severe GHD.     

Bone markers and bone mineral density during growth hormone treatment in children with growth hormone deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) has a positive impact on muscle mass, growth and bone formation. It is known to interact with the bone-forming unit, with well-documented increases in markers of bone formation and bone resorption within weeks of the start of GH therapy. These changes relate significantly to short-term growth rate, but it is not evident that they predict long-term response to GH therapy. The consequences of GH deficiency (GHD) and GH replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) have been difficult to interpret in children because of the dependency of areal BMD on height and weight. Some studies have tried to overcome this problem by calculating volumetric BMD, but results are conflicting. The attainment of a normal peak bone mass in an individual is considered important for the future prevention of osteoporosis. From the limited data available, it appears difficult to normalize bone mass totally in GH-deficient individuals, despite GH treatment for long periods. Studies to date examining the interaction between GH and bone have included only small numbers of individuals, making it difficult to interpret the study findings. It is hoped that these issues can be clarified in future research by the direct measurement of bone density (using quantitative computer tomography). Mineralization is only one facet of bone strength, however; other important components (e.g. bone structure and geometry) should be addressed in future paediatric studies. Future studies could also address the importance of the degree of GHD in childhood; how GH dose and insulin-like growth factor-I levels achieved during therapy relate to the final outcome; whether or not the continuation of GH therapy after the attainment of final height may further enhance bone mass; whether the timing and dose of other treatments (e.g. sex hormone replacement therapy) are critical to the outcome; and whether GHD in childhood is associated with an increased risk of fracture.     

Changes of thyroid function during long-term hGH therapy in GHD children. A possible relationship with catch-up growth?

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone (GH) treatment in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) can determine changes in the thyroid function. The clinical significance of these changes remains controversial, and all studies have so far covered rather a short period--usually no longer than one year. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of long-term recombinant hGH treatment in children with idiopathic GHD on the thyroid function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen prepubertal children (12 boys and 7 girls, mean age 9.2 +/- 3.1 years) with idiopathic GHD were studied and followed for twenty-four months. None of the patients showed multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. Nineteen healthy children matched for age and sex acted as controls. RESULTS: Patients with GHD showed a significant increase in TT (3) at twelve months and in FT (3) at six and twelve months after starting GH treatment, with a significant decrease at eighteen and twenty-four months. TT (4) level decreased significantly at twelve months and increased significantly at eighteen and twenty-four months. FT (4) also decreased, but only slightly, after twelve months of hGH treatment, and then increased significantly at twenty-four months. TSH levels did not vary significantly during the course of therapy. TT (3)/TT (4) and FT (3)/FT (4) ratios increased significantly after six and twelve months of therapy and significantly decreased later, approaching pre-therapy values. The SDS of Growth Velocity (SDS-GV) increased remarkably during the first year of therapy and then decreased significantly during the second year, although it remained significantly higher than the pre-therapy values. TT (3) and TT (3)/TT (4) ratio displayed a significant correlation with SDS-GV at twelve months of therapy. In a multiple regression analysis with age, bone age, parental height, GH dose, TT (3,) TT (3)/TT (4), and the SDS of IGF-I, only the TT (3)/TT (4) ratio at twelve months of therapy (p < 0.001) was identified as a significant predictor of SDS-GV. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that changes in thyroid function are present in GHD children during long-term hGH therapy. These changes probably resulted from the effect of hGH on the peripheral metabolism of thyroid hormones and appear to be transitory, disappearing during the second year of hGH treatment. We speculate on the functional significance of these changes, and in particular, on their role in catch-up growth after hGH therapy.     

Growth hormone and neurofibromatosis

Data collected from 102 neurofibromatosis (NF) children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) who were receiving GH replacement therapy were reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety of GH therapy in this condition. GH was administered at a mean dose of 0. 18 mg/kg/week. During the 1st year the median height velocity increased significantly from 4.2 cm/year before treatment to 7.1 cm/year, and the median height standard deviation score increased from -2.4 to -1.9. The response to therapy, however, was not as good as that observed in patients with idiopathic GHD. GH therapy did not influence the progression of any of the features of NF, including intracranial tumours, and was not associated with an excess of other adverse events. We conclude that GH treatment of NF patients with GHD is beneficial in terms of improved growth rate and is well tolerated.     

Effects of growth hormone replacement therapy on bone markers and bone mineral density in growth hormone-deficient adults

During the 1990s, interest in the effects of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults increased, and several studies were performed to evaluate the effects of growth hormone (GH) substitution therapy in these patients. Because adults with GHD have reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures, the effects of GH replacement therapy on bone metabolism have been evaluated in long-term studies. A universal finding is that the serum and urinary levels of biochemical bone markers increase during GH substitution therapy, and these increases are dose dependent. After years of GH substitution therapy, the levels of biochemical bone markers remain elevated, according to some studies, whereas other studies report that these levels return to baseline. BMD of the spine, hip and forearm increase after 18-24 months of treatment. Bone mineral content (BMC) increases to a greater extent than BMD, because the areal projection of bone also increases. This difference could be caused by increased periosteal bone formation, but a measurement artefact resulting from the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cannot be excluded as a possible explanation. One study of GH-deficient adults found that, after 33 months of GH treatment, BMD and BMC increased to a greater extent in men with GHD than in women. There is also a gender difference in the increases in serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I and biochemical bone markers during GH treatment. The reason for these findings is unknown, and the role of sex steroids in determining the response to GH therapy remains to be fully elucidated.     

Pharmacological testing of growth hormone secretion

The laboratory confirmation of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) has been extensively studied. Multiple stimuli induce GH release, but insulin-induced hypoglycemia usually is considered the 'gold standard'. Seventy-five to 90% of normal children have significant increments of hGH to any single test. Complete and partial syndromes of GHD have been defined, but some patients with a clinical appearance of GHD release hGH during provocative testing. Discordant results on varied tests may occur in the same child. Sequential and simultaneous tests have been attempted with diverse time patterns; testing sequence may significantly affect data interpretation. Persistent problems with GH provocative tests remain: normal data not strictly defined throughout childhood, multiple tests with discordant results, and substantial discrepancies of immunopotency estimates with different radioimmunoassays. Some children with 'normal' hGH increments during provocative tests, despite clinical GHD, may require short-term treatment with hGH to finally establish the diagnosis.