The role of adjuvant agents in treating fungal diseases

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality despite the recent introduction of new antifungal medications. In this review, the available data on the use of adjuvant agents for the treatment of IFIs are discussed. Cytokines such as interferon-γ, colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte transfusions, and the monoclonal antibody efungumab may have in a role in the management of IFIs through augmentation of the host immune response, whereas pathogen-specific vaccines may help prevent infection. Pentraxin 3, an acute phase protein, may assist in the prevention and treatment of aspergillosis. Deferasirox, an iron chelator, is being investigated as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of zygomycosis. Lactoferrin, an ironbinding protein, appears to have activity in Candida and Aspergillus infections, and omiganan may help prevent fungal catheter-related infections. Although none of these agents are currently approved for the treatment of IFIs, they may be involved in current and/or future treatment options when used in combination with antifungal drugs.     

Is There Still a Place for Conventional Amphotericin B in the Treatment of Neonatal Fungal Infections?

Neonatal invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain an increasing problem associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as late-onset neurodevelopmental implications. Invasive candidiasis remains the leading neonatal IFI. Candida albicans is the fungal species most often affecting this population, although a changing epidemiologic incidence to non-albicans Candida species is reported in some neonatal intensive care units. Many treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult populations, emphasizing the need to establish the optimal antifungal agent, dosage, and duration of therapy in neonates. Historically, conventional amphotericin B has been considered an efficient and safe treatment approach for most neonatal IFIs. More recently, lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been studied, used alone or in combination with other antifungal agents such as azoles or echinocandins. The aim of this article is to review the published experience in the use of amphotericin B formulations to treat neonatal IFIs.     

Antifungal Drug Resistance: Clinical Relevance and Impact of Antifungal Drug Use

Antifungal drug resistance significantly impacts treatment outcomes in patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Although primary (intrinsic) resistance may occur independent of previous therapy, prior concomitant antifungal exposure increases the risk for secondary (acquired) resistance and subsequent colonization or infection with less-susceptible pathogens. Among various pathogen-antifungal combinations, this effect has been best studied clinically with azole exposure and the risk of Candida spp. with reduced susceptibility. The rapid development of secondary resistance to flucytosine in Candida spp. has limited its use as monotherapy. Secondary resistance to amphotericin B is infrequent. In contrast, secondary resistance in Aspergillus spp. is less of a concern. Recent reports of secondary resistance in patients receiving fluconazole for cryptococcal infections may justify susceptibility testing in the setting of prior therapy or treatment failure. Despite numerous patient-focused, drug-focused, and disease-focused strategies to improve treatment outcomes, clinical resistance (manifesting as treatment failures despite adequate antifungal therapy) continues to be problematic in patients with serious IFIs.     

Use of Antifungal Combination Therapy: Agents,Order, and Timing

Given the substantial morbidity and mortality related to invasive fungal infections, treatment with a combination of antifungal agents is often considered. A growing body of literature from in vitro studies, animal models, and clinical experience provides data evaluating this approach. This review describes combination antifungal strategies for the management of cryptococcal meningitis, invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and rare mold infections. The potential effects that sequencing and timing have on the efficacy of such approaches are discussed, with a focus on recent clinical data in this arena.     

Combination antifungal therapy: From bench to bedside

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite improved outcomes with new antifungals, there remains a pressing need to further improve outcomes, especially with invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections. Combination antifungal therapy is an attractive option that offers the prospect for improved efficacy, decreased toxicity, reduced likelihood for the emergence of resistance, and shorter courses of therapy. The current available evidence regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal infections is discussed in this article, including data from in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials to try to clarify this important issue. Randomized, prospective clinical trials are urgently needed, especially for invasive aspergillosis.     

侵袭性真菌感染治疗新进展

随着免疫受损人群的增多,近年来侵袭性真菌感染的发生率逐渐升高,由此导致的致病率也逐年上升.如何及时诊断并有效的治疗侵袭性真菌感染已成为临床上面临的挑战之一.该文就侵袭性真菌感染的流行病学、病因学及现有的治疗策略等方面进行综述.     

Papel futuro de la micafungina en el tratamiento de las micosis invasoras por hongos filamentosos

BackgroundMicafungin is a echinocandin. It inhibits β-1,3-D-glucan synthesis, thus achieving fungicidal activity against virtually all Candida spp., including those resistant to fluconazole, and fungistatic activity against Aspergillus spp., as well as several but not all pathogenic molds. Results from in vitro studies, animal models, small clinical trials, hint at possible future indications such as invasive aspergillosis and empirical viantifungal therapy, although currently there is little information published.AimsTo describe published data of micafungin as treatment against invasive mold infections, specially analysing its role in the inmunodepressed host and critical care setting.MethodsA sistematic review of literature using the principal medical search engines was performed. Terms such as micafungin, aspergillosis, zygomycosis, invasive fungal infections, emerging fungal infections, antifungal treatment or therapy, antifungal prophylaxis, empiric or pre-emptive therapy were crossed. Febrile neutropenia patients were excluded.ResultsSeveral studies in these setting were identified and were described in this review. Although there were no blinded randomized clinical trials published, treatment or prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mould infections with micafungin described in open clinical studies were analyzed.ConclusionsMicafungin could play a future important role as a primary or rescue therapy, alone or in combination, in the treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections caused by moulds. New randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm their efficacy.     

米卡芬净预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染有效性和安全性的Meta分析

目的系统评价米卡芬净预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染(IFIs)的有效性及安全性,为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据,检索时限为建库起至2021年1月,收集米卡芬净(试验组)对比常规抗真菌药物(两性霉素B及三唑类抗真菌药,对照组)的随机对照试验(RCT),对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行资料提取并采用Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.2进行质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件对突破性IFIs、真菌感染死亡率、全因死亡率及因不良反应停药的发生率进行Meta分析。结果共纳入9项RCT,合计2 479例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者突破性IFIs发生率[OR=0.74,95%CI(0.50,1.07),P=0.11]、真菌感染死亡率[OR=0.73,95%CI(0.46,1.17),P=0.19]和全因死亡率[OR=0.94,95%CI(0.69,1.28),P=0.7]与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义;因不良反应停药的发生率[OR=0.46,95%CI(0.32,0.66),P<0.0001]显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论米卡芬净用于预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者IFIs的效果与两性霉素B及三唑类抗真菌药物相当,且安全性更高。     

Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Mycopathologia - We sought to determine the occurrence, risk factors, effect of antifungal prophylaxis, and outcomes of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia...     

Invasive Fungal Infections: A Continuing Challenge Report from the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host, Genoa, Italy, 24–27 July 2012

The management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remains a challenge to the most experienced clinicians and mycologists as the therapeutic landscape continues to change. Delegates to the 17th International Symposium on Infections in the Immunocompromised Host heard that fungal epidemiology, patient demographics, diagnosis and treatment are all evolving. Diagnosis-driven therapy—pre-emptive or targeted—is the ideal approach to managing IFIs, but is dependent on reliable biomarker assays to identify, or at least strongly suggest, the organism(s) responsible. Biomarkers, however, are subject to ongoing research and so are also evolving. Some assays also may not be available in a particular centre. The same applies to investigations such as CT-scans and bronchoscopy that need to be performed in a timely fashion to help confirm an IFI. Thus, for patients with febrile neutropenia despite broad-spectrum antibiotic cover, clinicians without the appropriate diagnostic facilities prefer to start antifungal (AF) treatment immediately whilst attempting to confirm the diagnosis. Empirical therapy therefore looks likely to have a role for some time. For high-risk patients, such as those with haematological malignancies and/or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the preferred strategy is to prevent IFIs using AF prophylaxis although regular screening with biomarkers is an alternative.     

Isavuconazole and Liposomal Amphotericin B as Successful Combination Therapy of Refractory Invasive Candidiasis in a Liver Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients are associated with elevated morbidity and mortality and pose a challenge to the treating physicians. Despite of lacking clinical data, the use of antifungal combination therapy is often considered to improve response rates in an immunocompromised patient population. We herein report a case of refractory invasive candidiasis in a liver transplant recipient treated successfully with a combination of isavuconazole und high-dose liposomal amphotericin B. The antimycotic combination treatment was able to clear a bloodstream infection with C. glabrata and led to regression of bilomas among tolerable side effects. The use of the above-mentioned antifungal combination therapy in a liver transplant recipient has not been reported previously. This case highlights the efficacy and safety of antifungal combination therapy in immunocompromised patients with refractory invasive candidiasis.

     

Invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients: different therapeutic options and a uniform strategy

The high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with the invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, is of importance since the prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions, based on early identification of risk factors, is of common occurrence. In the last years alone there have been important developments in antifungal pharmacotherapy. Evidence-based studies using new antifungal agents are now emerging as important players in the pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections in seriously ill and difficult patients. However, data on critically ill patients are more limited and usually recovered from general studies. This study shows the benefits obtained by the new antifungal agents on different clinical situations in critical care units. The increasing number of non-C. albicans species and the high mortality rates in these settings suggest that the application of early de-escalation therapy in critically ill patients with fungal infection should be mandatory. The possibility of using antifungal combination therapy in these types of patients should be considered.     

Current Approaches in Antifungal Prophylaxis in High Risk Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) pose the most serious infectious risk to patients with hematologic malignancies and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Invasive candidiasis has an incidence of 8–18% and a mortality of 30–40% in various reports. Invasive aspergillosis has an incidence of 4–15% and an even higher mortality of 60–85% cited in the published literature. IFIs have remained difficult to diagnose in a timely way in neutropenic and immunocompromised patients. A timely diagnosis is essential in promptly initiating antifungal therapy in order to optimize clinical outcomes. Thus, antifungal prophylaxis has an enormous appeal to minimize the threat from IFIs. In this article, the epidemiology and risk factors for IFIs as well as evidence from antifungal prophylaxis clinical trials in certain patient groups with hematologic malignancies are reviewed. Antifungal prophylaxis has been shown to be effective in certain settings. However, concerns about shifts in fungal epidemiology, emergence of resistance, drug toxicities, and drug interactions must be considered in deciding how and in whom to use antifungal prophylaxis.     

Opciones terapéuticas para el tratamiento antifúngico en el paciente crítico

Invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, have become an excellent target for prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions due to their associated high morbidity, mortality rate, increased incidence, and healthcare costs. For these reasons, new studies and laboratory tests have been developed over the last few years in order to formulate an early therapeutic intervention strategy in an attempt to reduce the high mortality rate associated with these infections. In recent years, evidencebased studies have shown the roles that the new antifungal drugs play in the treatment of invasive mycosis in seriously ill and complex patients, although data from critically ill patients are more limited. New antifungal agents have been analyzed in different clinical situations in critical care units, and the increasing number of non-Candida albicans species suggest that the application of early echinocandin therapy in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis is a good option. Voriconazole should be recommended for invasive aspergillosis as a first line option.     

An update on the pharmacoeconomics of antifungal pharmacotherapy

The incidence and severity of invasive fungal infections are on the rise and they pose a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. The cost burden of fungal infections in the United States is high. There are many newer, less toxic antifungal agents to manage these challenging infections; however, these agents also carry a high cost of their own. When considering an antifungal agent for a specific patient, it is important to consider safety, efficacy, and cost, thus making it essential to continually evaluate the antifungal pharmacoeconomic literature to assist in the therapeutic decision-making process for patients with invasive fungal infections. Unfortunately, there is a lack of pharmacoeconomic studies addressing the costs associated with the treatment and prevention of fungal infections. Future large-scale clinical studies should include pharmacoeconomic analyses and end points that encompass all costs associated with antifungal drug use, not solely drug acquisition costs.     

Antifungal Therapy in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

Antifungal therapy during pregnancy and lactation is challenging because of a lack of data on efficacy and safety, coupled with reports of teratogenicity. Although the Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category provides guidance regarding a drug’s potential fetal risks, limitations such as lack of a specific toxic dose or predisposing pregnancy trimester thwart its application. Central to the selection of optimal antifungal therapy are exploration of the literature and assessment of patient-specific factors, including awareness of effects on the pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents that result from physiologic changes during pregnancy. Topical azoles are favored for superficial fungal infections during pregnancy and lactation, whereas amphotericin B is preferred for invasive fungal infections. Data regarding the use of antifungal agents by breastfeeding women are lacking. More studies are needed, particularly with newer antifungals, to better guide clinicians in selecting optimal antifungal therapy that will provide benefit to the mother without harm to the fetus.     

Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Fungal Diseases in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: An Update

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. While the most common pathogens are Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., the incidence of infections caused by non-albicans Candida species as well as molds such as Zygomycetes has increased. For many years, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB-D) was the only available antifungal for the treatment of IFDs. Within the past decade, there has been a surge of new antifungal agents developed and added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B provide an effective and less nephrotoxic alternative to AMB-D. Voriconazole has now replaced AMB-D as first choice for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Another extended-spectrum triazole, posaconazole, also appears to be a promising agent in the management of zygomycosis, refractory aspergillosis, and for prophylaxis. Members of the newest antifungal class, the echinocandins, are attractive agents in select infections due to their safety profile, and are a more attractive option compared to AMB-D as initial treatment for invasive candidiasis and (based on one study) challenge fluconazole for superiority in management with this mycoses. However, challenges do exist among these newer agents in very high-risk individuals like allogeneic SCT recipients, which may include adverse drug events, drug–drug interactions, variability in oral absorption, and availability of alternative formulations. The addition of newer agents has also stimulated interest in the potential application of combination therapy in serious, life-threatening infections. However, adequate studies are not available for most IFDs; thus, the clinical use of combination therapy is not evidenced based on most cases and preciseness in its use is uncertain. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring of select antifungals (notably posaconazole and voriconazole) may play an increasing role due to significant interpatient variability in serum concentrations after standard doses.     

Low Rate of Invasive Fungal Infections During Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Anti-mold Prophylaxis: Single-Center 2002–2018 Empirical/Pre-emptive Approach

Broad-spectrum antifungal prophylaxis is currently considered the standard of care for adults with de novo AML for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), especially invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Because fluconazole has been used in our center as anti-yeast prophylaxis, we sought to analyze in detail the incidence of IFIs over a 17-year period, as well as their impact on outcome. A standardized protocol of patient management, including serum galactomannan screening and thoracic CT-guided diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy, was used in all patients. A total of 214 consecutive adults with de novo AML who were treated in 3 CETLAM (Grupo Cooperativo para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias) protocols from 2002 to 2018 were included. The 90-day incidence of any IFI (including possible cases) was 11% (95% CI 4–15%), most cases occurred during induction chemotherapy (8%, 95% CI 4–12%), and most cases were probable/proven IPA (8%, 95% CI 3–13%). Developing an IFI during induction and consolidation had no impact on 1-year survival. A case–control study with 23 cases of IPA and 69 controls identified induction/re-induction chemotherapy, chronic pulmonary disease and age?>?60 years/poor baseline performance status as potential pretreatment risk factors. The current study proves that inpatient induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML can be given in areas with “a priori” high-burden of airborne molds with fluconazole prophylaxis, while the selective use of anti-mold prophylaxis in patients at very high risk may further reduce the incidence of IFI in this specific clinical scenario.

     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Invasive Mould Infections in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Invasive mould infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT). Allogeneic HSCT recipients are at substantially higher risk than autologous HSCT recipients. Although neutropenia following the conditioning regimen remains an important risk factor for opportunistic fungal infections, most cases of invasive mould infection in allogeneic HSCT recipients occur after neutrophil recovery in the setting of potent immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host disease. Invasive aspergillosis is the most common mould infection. However, there has been an increased incidence of less common non-Aspergillus moulds that include zygomycetes, Fusarium sp., and Scedosporium sp. Reflecting a key need, important advances have been made in the antifungal armamentarium. Voriconazole has become a new standard of care as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis based on superiority over amphotericin B. There is significant interest in combination therapy for invasive aspergillosis pairing voriconazole or an amphotericin B formulation with an echinocandin. There have also been advances in novel diagnostic methods that facilitate early detection of invasive fungal infections that include galactomannan and beta-glucan antigen detection and PCR using fungal specific primers. We review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of invasive mould infection in HSCT, with a focus on allogeneic recipients. We also discuss options for prevention and early treatment of invasive mould infections.