Correlating Macro and Atomic Structure with Elastic Properties and Ionic Transport of Glassy Li2S‐P2S5 (LPS) Solid Electrolyte for Solid‐State Li Metal Batteries

A combination of high ionic conductivity and facile processing suggest that sulfide‐based materials are promising solid electrolytes that have the potential to enable Li metal batteries. Although the Li₂S‐P₂S₅ (LPS) family of compounds exhibit desirable characteristics, it is known that Li metal preferentially propagates through microstructural defects, such as particle boundaries and/or pores. Herein, it is demonstrated that a near theoretical density (98% relative density) LPS 75‐25 glassy electrolyte exhibiting high ionic conductivity can be achieved by optimizing the molding pressure and temperature. The optimal molding pressure reduces porosity and particle boundaries while preserving the preferred amorphous structure. Moreover, molecular rearrangements and favorable Li coordination environments for conduction are attained. Consequently, the Young's Modulus approximately doubles (30 GPa) and the ionic conductivity increases by a factor of five (1.1 mS cm^?1) compared to conventional room temperature molding conditions. It is believed that this study can provide mechanistic insight into processing‐structure‐property relationships that can be used as a guide to tune microstructural defects/properties that have been identified to have an effect on the maximum charging current that a solid electrolyte can withstand during cycling without short‐circuiting.     

A Lithium Amide‐Borohydride Solid‐State Electrolyte with Lithium‐Ion Conductivities Comparable to Liquid Electrolytes

High ionic conductivity of up to 6.4 × 10^?3 S cm^?1 near room temperature (40 °C) in lithium amide‐borohydrides is reported, comparable to values of liquid organic electrolytes commonly employed in lithium‐ion batteries. Density functional theory is applied coupled with X‐ray diffraction, calorimetry, and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments to shed light on the conduction mechanism. A Li₄Ti₅O₁₂ half‐cell battery incorporating the lithium amide‐borohydride electrolyte exhibits good rate performance up to 3.5 mA cm^?2 (5 C) and stable cycling over 400 cycles at 1 C at 40 °C, indicating high bulk and interfacial stability. The results demonstrate the potential of lithium amide‐borohydrides as solid‐state electrolytes for high‐power lithium‐ion batteries.     

Flexible Composite Solid Electrolyte Facilitating Highly Stable “Soft Contacting” Li–Electrolyte Interface for Solid State Lithium‐Ion Batteries

A flexible composite solid electrolyte membrane consisting of inorganic solid particles (Li_1.3Al_0.3Ti_1.7(PO₄)₃), polyethylene oxide (PEO), and boronized polyethylene glycol (BPEG) is prepared and investigated. This membrane exhibits good stability against lithium dendrite, which can be attributed to its well‐designed combination components: the compact inorganic lithium ion conducting layer provides the membrane with good mechanical strength and physically barricades the free growth of lithium dendrite; while the addition of planar BPEG oligomers not only disorganizes the crystallinity of the PEO domain, leading to good ionic conductivity, but also facilitates a “soft contact” between interfaces, which not only chemically enables homogeneous lithium plating/stripping on the lithium metal anode, but also reduces the polarization effects. In addition, by employing this membrane to a LiFePO₄/Li cell and testing its galvanostatic cycling performances at 60 °C, capacities of 158.2 and 94.2 mA h g^?1 are delivered at 0.1 C and 2 C, respectively.     

Suppressing Li Dendrite Formation in Li2S‐P2S5 Solid Electrolyte by LiI Incorporation

Solid electrolytes have been considered as a promising approach for Li dendrite prevention because of their high mechanical strength and high Li transference number. However, recent reports indicate that Li dendrites also form in Li₂S‐P₂S₅ based sulfide electrolytes at current densities much lower than that in the conventional liquid electrolytes. The methods of suppressing dendrite formation in sulfide electrolytes have rarely been reported because the mechanism for the “unexpected” dendrite formation is unclear, limiting the successful utilization of high‐energy Li anode with these electrolytes. Herein, the authors demonstrate that the Li dendrite formation in Li₂S‐P₂S₅ glass can be effectively suppressed by tuning the composition of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at the Li/electrolyte interface through incorporating LiI into the electrolyte. This approach introduces high ionic conductivity but electronic insulation of LiI in the SEI, and more importantly, improves the mobility of Li atoms, promoting the Li depositon at the interface and thus suppresses dendrite growth. It is shown that the critical current density is improved significantly after incorporating LiI into Li₂S‐P₂S₅ glass, reaching 3.90 mA cm^?2 at 100 °C after adding 30 mol% LiI. Stable cycling of the Li‐Li cells for 200 h is also achieved at 1.50 mA cm^?2 at 100 °C.     

Interfacial Incompatibility and Internal Stresses in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Ion Batteries

Rechargeable Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) are electrochemical storage device widely applied in electric vehicles, mobile electronic devices, etc. However, traditional LIBs containing liquid electrolytes suffer from flammability, poor electrochemical stability, and limited operational temperature range. Replacement of the liquid electrolytes with inorganic solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) would solve this problem. However, several critical issues, such as poor interfacial compatibility, low ionic conductivity at ambient temperatures, etc., need to be surmounted before the commercialization of all‐solid‐state Li‐ion batteries (ASSLIBs). In this review, a brief historical context for the inorganic SSEs is described first. Then, two critical issues in the ASSLIBs are highlighted: interfacial incompatibility of the electrodes and SSEs and internal stresses. For the interfacial incompatibility, the discussion is focused on the dynamic characterization of the electrode/SSE interfaces, the origin and evolution of the interfacial resistance, and interface engineering to minimize the interfacial resistance. The internal stresses in the ASSLIBs are another major concern because rigid contacts are introduced. Stress generation, stress evolution during battery cycling, stress measurement/simulation, and ways to alleviate the stresses are outlined in detail. Finally, current challenges and perspectives for future development of the inorganic SSEs and ASSLIBs are outlined.     

New Na‐Ion Solid Electrolytes Na4−xSn1−xSbxS4 (0.02 ≤ x ≤ 0.33) for All‐Solid‐State Na‐Ion Batteries

Sulfide Na‐ion solid electrolytes (SEs) are key to enable room‐temperature operable all‐solid‐state Na‐ion batteries that are attractive for large‐scale energy storage applications. To date, few sulfide Na‐ion SEs have been developed and most of the SEs developed contain P and suffer from poor chemical stability. Herein, discovery of a new structural class of tetragonal Na_4?xSn_1?xSb_xS₄ (0.02 ≤ x ≤ 0.33) with space group I4₁/acd is described. The evolution of a new phase, distinctly different from Na₄SnS₄ or Na₃SbS₄, allows fast ionic conduction in 3D pathways (0.2–0.5 mS cm^?1 at 30 °C). Moreover, their excellent air stability and reversible dissolution in water and precipitation are highlighted. Specifically, TiS₂/Na–Sn all‐solid‐state Na‐ion batteries using Na_3.75Sn_0.75Sb_0.25S₄ demonstrates high capacity (201 mA h (g of TiS₂)^?1) with excellent reversibility.     

Dopant‐Dependent Stability of Garnet Solid Electrolyte Interfaces with Lithium Metal

Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ (LLZO) garnet‐based materials doped with Al, Nb, or Ta to stabilize the Li⁺‐conductive cubic phase are a particularly promising class of solid electrolytes for all‐solid‐state lithium metal batteries. Understanding of the intrinsic reactivity between solid electrolytes and relevant electrode materials is crucial to developing high voltage solid‐state batteries with long lifetimes. Using a novel, surface science‐based approach to characterize the intrinsic reactivity of the Li–solid electrolyte interface, it is determined that, surprisingly, some degree of Zr reduction takes place for all three dopant types, with the extent of reduction increasing as Ta < Nb < Al. Significant reduction of Nb also takes place for Nb‐doped LLZO, with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of Li||Nb–LLZO||Li symmetric cells further revealing significant increases in impedance with time and suggesting that the Nb reduction propagates into the bulk. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that Nb‐doped material shows a strong preference for Nb dopants toward the interface between LLZO and Li, while Ta does not exhibit a similar preference. EIS and DFT results, coupled with the observed reduction of Zr at the interface, are consistent with the formation of an “oxygen‐deficient interphase” (ODI) layer whose structure determines the stability of the LLZO–Li interface.     

The Fast Charge Transfer Kinetics of the Lithium Metal Anode on the Garnet‐Type Solid Electrolyte Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12

The charge transfer kinetics between a lithium metal electrode and an inorganic solid electrolyte is of key interest to assess the rate capability of future lithium metal solid state batteries. In an in situ microelectrode study run in a scanning electron microscope, it is demonstrated that—contrary to the prevailing opinion—the intrinsic charge transfer resistance of the Li|Li_6.25Al_0.25La₃Zr₂O₁₂ (LLZO) interface is in the order of 10^?1 Ω cm² and thus negligibly small. The corresponding high exchange current density in combination with the single ion transport mechanism (t⁺ ≈ 1) of the inorganic solid electrolyte enables extremely fast plating kinetics without the occurrence of transport limitations. Local plating rates in the range of several A cm^?2 are demonstrated at defect free and chemically clean Li|LLZO interfaces. Practically achievable current densities are limited by lateral growth of lithium along the surface as well as electro‐chemo‐mechanical‐induced fracture of the solid electrolyte. In combination with the lithium vacancy diffusion limitation during electrodissolution, these morphological instabilities are identified as the key fundamental limitations of the lithium metal electrode for solid‐state batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes.     

Building Lithiophilic Ion‐Conduction Highways on Garnet‐Type Solid‐State Li+ Conductors

The integration of highly conductive solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) into solid‐state cells is still a challenge mainly due to the high impedance existing at the electrolyte/electrode interface. Although solid‐state garnet‐based batteries have been successfully assembled with the assistance of an intermediate layer between the garnet and the Li metal anode, the slow discharging/charging rates of the batteries inhibits practical applications, which require much higher power densities. Here, a crystalline sulfonated‐covalent organic framework (COF) thin layer is grown on the garnet surface via a simple solution process. It not only significantly improves the lithiophilicity of garnet electrolytes via the lithiation of the COF layer with molten Li, but also creates effective Li⁺ diffusion “highways” between the garnet and the Li metal anode. As a result, the interfacial impedance of symmetric solid‐state Li cells is significantly decreased and the cells can be operated at high current densities up to 3 mA cm^?2, which is difficult to achieve with current interfacial modification technologies for SSEs. The solid‐state Li‐ion batteries using LiFePO₄ cathodes, Li anodes, and COF‐modified garnet electrolytes thus exhibit a significantly improved rate capability.     

Solid‐State Prelithiation Enables High‐Performance Li‐Al‐H Anode for Solid‐State Batteries

Lithium alanates exhibit high theoretical specific capacities and appropriate lithiation/delithiation potentials, but suffer from poor reversibility, cycling stability, and rate capability due to their sluggish kinetics and extensive side reactions. Herein, a novel and facile solid‐state prelithiation approach is proposed to in situ prepare a Li₃AlH₆‐Al nanocomposite from a short‐circuited electrochemical reaction between LiAlH₄ and Li with the help of fast electron and Li‐ion conductors (C and P6₃mc LiBH₄). This nanocomposite consists of dispersive Al nanograins and an amorphous Li₃AlH₆ matrix, which enables superior electrochemical performance in solid‐state cells, as much higher specific capacity (2266 mAh g^?1), Coulombic efficiency (88%), cycling stability (71% retention in the 100th cycle), and rate capability (1429 mAh g^?1 at 1 A g^?1) are achieved. In addition, this nanocomposite works well in the solid‐state full cell with LiCoO₂ cathode, demonstrating its promising application prospects. Mechanism analysis reveals that the dispersive Al nanograins and amorphous Li₃AlH₆ matrix can dramatically enhance the lithiation and delithiation kinetics without side reactions, which is mainly responsible for the excellent overall performance. Moreover, this solid‐state prelithiation approach is general and can also be applied to other Li‐poor electrode materials for further modification of their electrochemical behavior.     

Interface‐Engineered All‐Solid‐State Li‐Ion Batteries Based on Garnet‐Type Fast Li+ Conductors

All‐solid‐state Li‐ion batteries based on Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ (LLZO) garnet structures require novel electrode assembly strategies to guarantee a proper Li⁺ transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interfaces. Here, first stable cell performances are reported for Li‐garnet, c‐Li_6.25Al_0.25La₃Zr₂O₁₂, all‐solid‐state batteries running safely with a full ceramics setup, exemplified with the anode material Li₄Ti₅O₁₂. Novel strategies to design an enhanced Li⁺ transfer at the electrode–electrolyte interface using an interface‐engineered all‐solid‐state battery cell based on a porous garnet electrolyte interface structure, in which the electrode material is intimately embedded, are presented. The results presented here show for the first time that all‐solid‐state Li‐ion batteries with LLZO electrolytes can be reversibly charge–discharge cycled also in the low potential ranges (≈1.5 V) for combinations with a ceramic anode material. Through a model experiment, the interface between the electrode and electrolyte constituents is systematically modified revealing that the interface engineering helps to improve delivered capacities and cycling properties of the all‐solid‐state Li‐ion batteries based on garnet‐type cubic LLZO structures.     

The Role of Interlayer Chemistry in Li‐Metal Growth through a Garnet‐Type Solid Electrolyte

Securing the chemical and physical stabilities of electrode/solid‐electrolyte interfaces is crucial for the use of solid electrolytes in all‐solid‐state batteries. Directly probing these interfaces during electrochemical reactions would significantly enrich the mechanistic understanding and inspire potential solutions for their regulation. Herein, the electrochemistry of the lithium/Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂‐electrolyte interface is elucidated by probing lithium deposition through the electrolyte in an anode‐free solid‐state battery in real time. Lithium plating is strongly affected by the geometry of the garnet‐type Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ (LLZO) surface, where nonuniform/filamentary growth is triggered particularly at morphological defects. More importantly, lithium‐growth behavior significantly changes when the LLZO surface is modified with an artificial interlayer to produce regulated lithium depositions. It is shown that lithium‐growth kinetics critically depend on the nature of the interlayer species, leading to distinct lithium‐deposition morphologies. Subsequently, the dynamic role of the interlayer in battery operation is discussed as a buffer and seed layer for lithium redistribution and precipitation, respectively, in tailoring lithium deposition. These findings broaden the understanding of the electrochemical lithium‐plating process at the solid‐electrolyte/lithium interface, highlight the importance of exploring various interlayers as a new avenue for regulating the lithium‐metal anode, and also offer insight into the nature of lithium growth in anode‐free solid‐state batteries.     

Incorporating Solvate and Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Li2S Batteries with High Capacity and Long Cycle Life

The development of all‐solid‐state lithium–sulfur batteries is hindered by the poor interfacial properties at solid electrolyte (SE)/electrode interfaces. The interface is modified by employing the highly concentrated solvate electrolyte, (MeCN)₂?LiTFSI:TTE, as an interlayer material at the electrolyte/electrode interfaces. The incorporation of an interlayer significantly improves the cycling performance of solid‐state Li₂S batteries compared to the bare counterpart, exhibiting a specific capacity of 760 mAh g^?1 at cycle 100 (330 mAh g^?1 for the bare cell). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy shows that the interfacial resistance of the interlayer‐modified cell gradually decreases as a function of cycle number, while the impedance of the bare cell remains almost constant. Cross‐section scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/ energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements on the interlayer‐modified cell confirm the permeation of solvate into the cathode and the SE with electrochemical cycling, which is related to the decrease in cell impedance. In order to mimic the full permeation of the solvate across the entire cell, the solvate is directly mixed with the SE to form a “solvSEM” electrolyte. The hybrid Li₂S cell using a solvSEM electrolyte exhibits superior cycling performance compared to the solid‐state cells, in terms of Li₂S loading, Li₂S utilization, and cycling stability. The improved performance is due to the favorable ionic contact at the battery interfaces.     

Slurry‐Fabricable Li+‐Conductive Polymeric Binders for Practical All‐Solid‐State Lithium‐Ion Batteries Enabled by Solvate Ionic Liquids

For mass production of all‐solid‐state lithium‐ion batteries (ASLBs) employing highly Li⁺ conductive and mechanically sinterable sulfide solid electrolytes (SEs), the wet‐slurry process is imperative. Unfortunately, the poor chemical stability of sulfide SEs severely restrict available candidates for solvents and in turn polymeric binders. Moreover, the binders interrupt Li⁺‐ionic contacts at interfaces, resulting in the below par electrochemical performance. In this work, a new scalable slurry fabrication protocol for sheet‐type ASLB electrodes made of Li⁺‐conductive polymeric binders is reported. The use of intermediate‐polarity solvent (e.g., dibromomethane) for the slurry allows for accommodating Li₆PS₅Cl and solvate‐ionic‐liquid‐based polymeric binders (NBR‐Li(G3)TFSI, NBR: nitrile?butadiene rubber, G3: triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, LiTFSI: lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) together without suffering from undesirable side reactions or phase separation. The LiNi_0.6Co_0.2Mn_0.2O₂ and Li₄Ti₅O₁₂ electrodes employing NBR‐Li(G3)TFSI show high capacities of 174 and 160 mA h g^?1 at 30 °C, respectively, which are far superior to those using conventional NBR (144 and 76 mA h g^?1). Moreover, high areal capacity of 7.4 mA h cm^?2 is highlighted for the LiNi_0.7Co_0.15Mn_0.15O₂ electrodes with ultrahigh mass loading of 45 mg cm^?2. The facilitated Li⁺‐ionic contacts at interfaces paved by NBR‐Li(G3)TFSI are evidenced by the complementary analysis from electrochemical and ⁷Li nuclear magnetic resonance measurements.