Antifungal activity of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with fluconazole

Fungal infections remain a challenge to clinicians due to the limited available antifungals. With the increasing use of antifungals in clinical practice, drug resistance has been emerging continuously, especially to fluconazole (FLC). Thus, a search for new antifungals and approaches to overcome antifungal resistance is needed. However, the development of new antifungals is usually costly and time consuming; discovering the antifungal activity of non-antifungal agents is one way to address these problems. Interestingly, some researchers have demonstrated that several classes of immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, etc) also displayed potent antifungal activity when used alone or in combination with antifungals, especially with FLC. Some of them could increase FLC's susceptibility against resistant Candida albicans significantly reversing fungal resistance to FLC. This article reviews the antifungal activities of immunosuppressants used alone or in combination with antifungals and their potential antifungal mechanisms that have been discovered so far. Although immunosuppressive agents have been identified as risk factors for fungal infection, we believe these findings are very important for overcoming drug resistance and developing new antifungals.     

Modern antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever

Empirical antifungal therapy has been shown to decrease the number of documented fungal infections in the setting of persistent fever during neutropenia. For decades, amphotericin B deoxycholate has been considered the agent of choice for first-line therapy in this setting. New antifungal agents associated with less toxicity, including the lipid formulations of amphotericin, voriconazole, and caspofungin, are now available and are considered to be suitable alternative first-line agents. In order to ensure appropriate therapy, however, the clinician must consider not only the differences between these antifungals but also patient-specific factors before initiating treatment.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antifungal agents

Despite a dramatic increase in the number of commercially available agents to treat invasive fungal infections, they remain a common and devastating problem in a variety of patients. The impact of these infections has furthered interest in optimizing antifungal therapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring has emerged as a potentially important area allowing the efficacy of select antifungals to be optimized. This article reviews emerging data examining the utility and rationale for voriconazole and posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring.     

New Antifungal Agents and New Formulations Against Dermatophytes

A variety of oral and topical antifungal agents are available for the treatment of superficial fungal infections caused by dermatophytes. This review builds on the antifungal therapy update published in this journal for the first special issue on Dermatophytosis (Gupta and Cooper 2008;166:353–67). Since 2008, there have not been additions to the oral antifungal armamentarium, with terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole still in widespread use, albeit for generally more severe or recalcitrant infections. Griseofulvin is used in the treatment of tinea capitis. Oral ketoconazole has fallen out of favor in many jurisdictions due to risks of hepatotoxicity. Topical antifungals, applied once or twice daily, are the primary treatment for tinea pedis, tinea corporis/tinea cruris, and mild cases of tinea unguium. Newer topical antifungal agents introduced include the azoles, efinaconazole, luliconazole, and sertaconazole, and the oxaborole, tavaborole. Research is focused on developing formulations of existing topical antifungals that utilize novel delivery systems in order to enhance treatment efficacy and compliance.     

Tratamiento antifúngico individualizado en el paciente crítico con infección fúngica invasora

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is the most common invasive fungal infection (IFI) affecting critically ill patients, followed by invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). International guidelines provide different recommendations for a first-line antifungal therapy and, in most of them, echinocandins are considered the first-line treatment for IC, and triazoles are so for the treatment of IPA. However, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is still considered a second-line therapy for both clinical entities. Although in the last decade the management of IFI has improved, several controversies persist. The antifungal drugs currently available may have a suboptimal activity, or be wrongly used in certain IFI involving critically ill patients. The aim of this review is to analyze when to provide individualized antifungal therapy to critically ill patients suffering from IFI, emphasizing the role of L-AmB. Drug-drug interactions, the clinical status, infectious foci (peritoneal candidiasis is discussed), the fungal species involved, and the need of monitoring the concentration of the antifungal drug in the patient are considered.     

Antifungal Therapy in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

Antifungal therapy during pregnancy and lactation is challenging because of a lack of data on efficacy and safety, coupled with reports of teratogenicity. Although the Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category provides guidance regarding a drug’s potential fetal risks, limitations such as lack of a specific toxic dose or predisposing pregnancy trimester thwart its application. Central to the selection of optimal antifungal therapy are exploration of the literature and assessment of patient-specific factors, including awareness of effects on the pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents that result from physiologic changes during pregnancy. Topical azoles are favored for superficial fungal infections during pregnancy and lactation, whereas amphotericin B is preferred for invasive fungal infections. Data regarding the use of antifungal agents by breastfeeding women are lacking. More studies are needed, particularly with newer antifungals, to better guide clinicians in selecting optimal antifungal therapy that will provide benefit to the mother without harm to the fetus.     

Combination antifungal therapy: From bench to bedside

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite improved outcomes with new antifungals, there remains a pressing need to further improve outcomes, especially with invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections. Combination antifungal therapy is an attractive option that offers the prospect for improved efficacy, decreased toxicity, reduced likelihood for the emergence of resistance, and shorter courses of therapy. The current available evidence regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal infections is discussed in this article, including data from in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials to try to clarify this important issue. Randomized, prospective clinical trials are urgently needed, especially for invasive aspergillosis.     

Biofilm Formation and its Impact on Antifungal Therapy

Fungi can protect themselves from host defences and antifungal drugs by the production of an extracellular hydrophobic matrix. Candida biofilms exhibit resistance to antifungal agents from all classes including the azoles, echinocandins, amphotericin B complex, and flucytosine. Although demonstrated on polystyrene and bronchial epithelia cells, until today, only indirect evidence for A. fumigatus biofilms in patients is available. The antifungals with the most activity against biofilms are the liposomal formulation of amphotericin B and agents in the echinocandin drug class. Importantly, echinocandins show excellent anti-biofilm activity against C. albicans at therapeutic concentrations. However, other biofilms formed by moulds, including A. fumigatus, are relatively resistant to echinocandins. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the intrinsic and acquired antifungal resistance during the different stages of fungal biofilm development. During the growth phase of the early biofilm various factors account for biofilm resistance. Combinational and sequential antifungal therapy as well as combination with enhancers can improve the effect of a single drug. Further studies are warranted to develop new therapeutic strategies targeting fungal biofilm-specific resistance mechanisms.     

Invasive Candidiasis in the Neutropenic Cancer Patient

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an important complication among cancer patients with neutropenia, as it is associated with significant mortality. Despite the introduction of the new antifungals in clinical practice and their widespread use as treatment or prophylaxis, the incidence of IC and the predominance of non-albicans Candida species remain unchanged, and mortality rates remain as high as in previous periods. New techniques have been developed to decrease the time to Candida species identification from blood cultures. Nonculture diagnostic methods and molecular diagnostic tests for detection of Candida are promising but have not been validated in neutropenic patients. Recently, voriconazole was proved to be as effective as fluconazole for prophylaxis in neutropenic recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants and in patients with graft-versus-host disease. Despite the lack of randomized studies of the treatment of IC among neutropenic patients, it seems that the success rates of antifungal therapy do not differ from those in non-neutropenic patients.     

Antifungal agents of the 1980's

The first of the “new” antifungals for systemic administration was clotrimazole (Bayer). Parenterally administered, this agent rapidly induced hepatic inactivating enzymes, and never achieved widespread use. Although miconazole was somewhat more successful, the drug which altered the world of antifungal therapy was ketoconazole. A broad antifungal spectrum, reduced toxicities compared with amphotericin B, and oral administration, all opened new possibilities for future drug development. Combined with the appearance of less toxic alternatives was the sharp increase in candidiasis among leukopenic patients, to the extent of causing up to 25% of deaths in these patients. A second major factor was the appearance of AIDS and huge problems with both mucosal candidiasis and cryptococcosis.Development of antifungals for systemic administration has been stimulated by the high efficacy and reduced toxicity of new drugs, and by increasing numbers of patients with systemic mycoses. Itraconazole and fluconazole are likely to be licensed in the near future-both have unique features that will give them some competing and non-competing roles. Even more potent agents are already entering clinical development, and nonazole antifungals have become the subjects of awakening interest. As recently as a decade ago the question was whether we would ever see alternatives to amphotericin B. Now the question is when amphotericin B will be at long last retired from its supremacy in this small but rapidly increasing field, the systemic mycoses.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Use of terbinafine in rare and refractory mycoses.

Terbinafine is the only systemic allylamine antifungal currently available. Its mechanism of action is unique and sets it apart from other agents. Although it is primarily used for dermatophyte infections, such as onychomycosis and tinea pedis, terbinafine has broad in vitro activity against a variety of non-dermatophyte fungal pathogens, including Candida spp. and many molds. In addition, synergistic activity is noted with other antifungals, notably triazoles. Multiple case reports exist of its use for unusual and refractory fungal infections, but no systematic review is available. We review the current literature with regard to in vitro data and clinical experience with terbinafine in the treatment of rare and refractory mycoses.     

Immunomodulating effects of antifungal therapy

The action of modern antifungal drugs may not be restricted to their direct fungicidal or fungistatic activity. Recent evidence suggests that antifungals may stimulate or alter the host immune response by mechanisms that may result in enhanced fungal clearance, but with possible increased collateral damage to the host. Dissecting the net impact of antifungal therapy-mediated immunomodulation is difficult because the type and magnitude of these immunostimulatory properties are influenced by the class and type of the drug, the immunologic status of the host, and the specific fungal pathogen. Ultimately, immunopharmacologic considerations may become important in selecting and dosing antifungal therapy for opportunistic mycoses.     

Antifungal treatment: Recent advances in dermatology.

In this paper we discuss the published relevant mycology dermatological reports which appeared in 1997 and 1998. The aims of this review is to give an actual view on antifungal therapy with a critical discussion on the efficacy of antifungals.     

Pharmacokinetic considerations for the use of newer antifungal agents

Endogenous commensal yeast and saprophytic molds remain important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment options for patients with serious fungal infections have improved over the past decade with the introduction of a novel class of antifungals that target the fungal cell wall (echinocandins) and a new generation of broader-spectrum triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole). Although these newer therapies provide a number of important advantages in terms of spectrum and safety, their efficacy in some patients can be compromised by limited penetration into some sites of infection or by variable serum concentrations. Hence, pharmacokinetic considerations have become increasingly important for the effective use of these newer antifungals. This article provides a brief overview of the pharmacology and important pharmacokinetic considerations of systemic antifungal therapies, with special focus on newer triazoles and echinocandins.     

Antifungals discovery: an insight into new strategies to combat antifungal resistance

Undeniably, new antifungal treatments are necessary against pathogenic fungi. Fungal infections have significantly increased in recent decades, being highlighted as important causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Five main antifungal classes are used: (i) azoles, (ii) echinocandins, (iii) polyenes, (iv) allylamines and (v) pyrimidine analogues. Moreover, the treatment of mycoses has several limitations, such as undesirable side effects, narrow activity spectrum, a small number of targets and fungal resistance, which are still of major concern in clinical practice. The discovery of new antifungals is mostly achieved by the screening of natural or synthetic/semisynthetic chemical compounds. The most recent discoveries in drug resistance mechanism and their avoidance were explored in a review, focusing on different antifungal targets, as well as new agents or strategies, such as combination therapy, that could improve antifungal therapy.

Significance and Impact of the Study

The failure to respond to antifungal therapy is complex and is associated with microbiological resistance and increased expression of virulence in fungal pathogens. Thus, this review offers an overview of current challenges in the treatment of fungal infections associated with increased antifungal drug resistance and the formation of biofilms in these opportunistic pathogens. Furthermore, the most recent and potential strategies to combat fungal pathogens are explored here, focusing on new agents as well as innovative approaches, such as combination therapy between antifungal drugs or with natural compounds.     

Antifungal lock therapy: an eternal promise or an effective alternative therapeutic approach?

Each year, millions of central venous catheter insertions are performed in intensive care units worldwide. The usage of these indwelling devices is associated with a high risk of bacterial and fungal colonization, leading to the development of microbial consortia, namely biofilms. These sessile structures provide fungal cells with resistance to the majority of antifungals, environmental stress and host immune responses. Based on different guidelines, colonized/infected catheters should be removed and changed immediately in the case of Candida-related central line infections. However, catheter replacement is not feasible for all patient populations. An alternative therapeutic approach may be antifungal lock therapy, which has received high interest, especially in the last decade. This review summarizes the published Candida-related in vitro, in vivo data and case studies in terms of antifungal lock therapy. The number of clinical studies remains limited and further studies are needed for safe implementation of the antifungal lock therapy into clinical practice.     

Reassessing the Use of Undecanoic Acid as a Therapeutic Strategy for Treating Fungal Infections

Treating fungal infections is challenging and frequently requires long-term courses of antifungal drugs. Considering the limited number of existing antifungal drugs, it is crucial to evaluate the possibility of repositioning drugs with antifungal properties and to revisit older antifungals for applications in combined therapy, which could widen the range of therapeutic possibilities. Undecanoic acid is a saturated medium-chain fatty acid with known antifungal effects; however, its antifungal properties have not been extensively explored. Recent advances indicate that the toxic effect of undecanoic acid involves modulation of fungal metabolism through its effects on the expression of fungal genes that are critical for virulence. Additionally, undecanoic acid is suitable for chemical modification and might be useful in synergic therapies. This review highlights the use of undecanoic acid in antifungal treatments, reinforcing its known activity against dermatophytes. Specifically, in Trichophyton rubrum, against which the activity of undecanoic acid has been most widely studied, undecanoic acid elicits profound effects on pivotal processes in the cell wall, membrane assembly, lipid metabolism, pathogenesis, and even mRNA processing. Considering the known antifungal activities and associated mechanisms of undecanoic acid, its potential use in combination therapy, and the ability to modify the parent compound structure, undecanoic acid shows promise as a novel therapeutic against fungal infections.

     

Update on Antifungal Resistance and its Clinical Impact

Candida and Aspergillus species are important causes of opportunistic infection in an ever-growing number of vulnerable patients, and these infections are associated with high mortality. This has partly been attributed to the emerging resistance of pathogenic fungi to antifungal therapy, which potentially compromises the management of infected patients. Multi-azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus is a current health problem, as well as is the co-resistance of Candida glabrata to both azoles and echinocandins. In most cases, negative clinical consequences of reduced in vitro fungal susceptibility to azoles and/or echinocandins can be traced to acquisition of particular resistance mechanisms. While strategies using antifungal combinations or adjunctive agents that maximize the efficacy of existing antifungals may limit treatment failures, new therapeutic approaches, including antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action, are urgent. In the meantime, more efforts should be devoted to close monitoring of antifungal resistance and its evolution in the clinical setting.