Co-digestion of manure and whey for in situ biogas upgrading by the addition of H2: process performance and microbial insights

In situ biogas upgrading was conducted by introducing H₂ directly to the anaerobic reactor. As H₂ addition is associated with consumption of the CO₂ in the biogas reactor, pH increased to higher than 8.0 when manure alone was used as substrate. By co-digestion of manure with acidic whey, the pH in the anaerobic reactor with the addition of hydrogen could be maintained below 8.0, which did not have inhibition to the anaerobic process. The H₂ distribution systems (diffusers with different pore sizes) and liquid mixing intensities were demonstrated to affect the gas-liquid mass transfer of H₂ and the biogas composition. The best biogas composition (75:6.6:18.4) was obtained at stirring speed 150 rpm and using ceramic diffuser, while the biogas in the control reactor consisted of CH₄ and CO₂ at a ratio of 55:45. The consumed hydrogen was almost completely converted to CH₄, and there was no significant accumulation of VFA in the effluent. The study showed that addition of hydrogen had positive effect on the methanogenesis, but had no obvious effect on the acetogenesis. Both hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity and the concentration of coenzyme F₄₂₀ involved in methanogenesis were increased. The archaeal community was also altered with the addition of hydrogen, and a Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus related band appeared in a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis gel from the sample of the reactor with hydrogen addition. Though the addition of hydrogen increased the dissolved hydrogen concentration, the degradation of propionate was still thermodynamically feasible at the reactor conditions.     

Inhibitory effects of the macrolide antimicrobial tylosin on anaerobic treatment

A laboratory-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) was operated using a glucose-based synthetic wastewater to study the effects of tylosin, a macrolide antimicrobial commonly used in swine production, on treatment performance. The experimental period was divided into three consecutive phases with different influent tylosin concentrations (0, 1.67, and 167 mg/L). The addition of 1.67 mg/L tylosin to the reactor had negligible effects on the overall treatment performance, that is, total methane production and effluent chemical oxygen demand did not change significantly (P < 0.05), yet analyses of individual ASBR cycles revealed a decrease in the rates of both methane production and propionate uptake after tylosin was added. The addition of 167 mg/L tylosin to the reactor resulted in a gradual decrease in methane production and the accumulation of propionate and acetate. Subsequent inhibition of methanogenesis was attributed to a decrease in the pH of the reactor. After the addition of 167 mg/L tylosin to the reactor, an initial decrease in the rate of glucose uptake during the ASBR cycle followed by a gradual recovery was observed. In batch tests, the specific biogas production with the substrate butyrate was completely inhibited in the presence of tylosin. This study indicated that tylosin inhibited propionate- and butyrate-oxidizing syntrophic bacteria and fermenting bacteria resulting in unfavorable effects on methanogenesis.     

Effects of acetate, propionate, and butyrate on the thermophilic anaerobic degradation of propionate by methanogenic sludge and defined cultures.

The effects of acetate, propionate, and butyrate on the anaerobic thermophilic conversion of propionate by methanogenic sludge and by enriched propionate-oxidizing bacteria in syntrophy with Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum delta H were studied. The methanogenic sludge was cultivated in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor fed with propionate (35 mM) as the sole substrate for a period of 80 days. Propionate degradation was shown to be severely inhibited by the addition of 50 mM acetate to the influent of the UASB reactor. The inhibitory effect remained even when the acetate concentration in the effluent was below the level of detection. Recovery of propionate oxidation occurred only when acetate was omitted from the influent medium. Propionate degradation by the methanogenic sludge in the UASB reactor was not affected by the addition of an equimolar concentration (35 mM) of butyrate to the influent. However, butyrate had a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of the propionate-oxidizing enrichment culture. In that case, the conversion of propionate was almost completely inhibited at a butyrate concentration of 10 mM. However, addition of a butyrate-oxidizing enrichment culture abolished the inhibitory effect, and propionate oxidation was even stimulated. All experiments were conducted at pH 7.0 to 7.7. The thermophilic syntrophic culture showed a sensitivity to acetate and propionate similar to that of mesophilic cultures described in the literature. Additions of butyrate or acetate to the propionate medium had no effect on the hydrogen partial pressure in the biogas of an UASB reactor, nor was the hydrogen partial pressure in propionate-degrading cultures affected by the two acids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Short-term effect of acetate and ethanol on methane formation in biogas sludge

Biochemical processes in biogas plants are still not fully understood. Especially, the identification of possible bottlenecks in the complex fermentation processes during biogas production might provide potential to increase the performance of biogas plants. To shed light on the question which group of organism constitutes the limiting factor in the anaerobic breakdown of organic material, biogas sludge from different mesophilic biogas plants was examined under various conditions. Therefore, biogas sludge was incubated and analyzed in anaerobic serum flasks under an atmosphere of N₂/CO₂. The batch reactors mirrored the conditions and the performance of the full-scale biogas plants and were suitable test systems for a period of 24 h. Methane production rates were compared after supplementation with substrates for syntrophic bacteria, such as butyrate, propionate, or ethanol, as well as with acetate and H₂+CO₂ as substrates for methanogenic archaea. Methane formation rates increased significantly by 35 to 126 % when sludge from different biogas plants was supplemented with acetate or ethanol. The stability of important process parameters such as concentration of volatile fatty acids and pH indicate that ethanol and acetate increase biogas formation without affecting normally occurring fermentation processes. In contrast to ethanol or acetate, other fermentation products such as propionate, butyrate, or H₂ did not result in increased methane formation rates. These results provide evidence that aceticlastic methanogenesis and ethanol-oxidizing syntrophic bacteria are not the limiting factor during biogas formation, respectively, and that biogas plant optimization is possible with special focus on methanogenesis from acetate.     

Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors

Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors fed with different wastes is examined. The specific methanogenic activity with acetate or hydrogen as substrate reflected the organic loading of the specific reactor examined. Increasing the loading of thermophilic reactors stabilized the process as indicated by a lower concentration of volatile fatty acids in the effluent from the reactors. The specific methanogenic activity in a thermophilic pilot-plant biogas reactor fed with a mixture of cow and pig manure reflected the stability of the reactor. The numbers of methanogens counted by the most probable number (MPN) technique with acetate or hydrogen as substrate were further found to vary depending on the loading rate and the stability of the reactor. The numbers of methanogens counted with antibody probes in one of the reactor samples was 10 times lower for the hydrogen-utilizing methanogens compared to the counts using the MPN technique, indicating that other non-reacting methanogens were present. Methanogens that reacted with the probe againstMethanobacterium thermoautotrophicum were the most numerous in this reactor. For the acetate-utilizing methanogens, the numbers counted with the antibody probes were more than a factor of 10 higher than the numbers found by MPN. The majority of acetate utilizing methanogens in the reactor wereMethanosarcina spp. single cells, which is a difficult form of the organism to cultivatein vitro. No reactions were observed with antibody probes raised againstMethanothrix soehngenii orMethanothrix CALS-1 in any of the thermophilic biogas reactors examined. Studies using 2-¹⁴C-labeled acetate showed that at high concentrations (more than approx. 1 mM) acetate was metabolized via the aceticlastic pathway, transforming the methyl-group of acetate into methane. When the concentration of acetate was less than approx. 1 mM, most of the acetate was oxidized via a two-step mechanism (syntrophic acetate oxidation) involving one organism oxidizing acetate into hydrogen and carbon dioxide and a hydrogen-utilizing methanogen forming the products of the first microorganism into methane. In thermophilic biogas reactors, acetate oxidizing cultures occupied the niche ofMethanothrix species, aceticlastic methanogens which dominate at low acetate concentrations in mesophilic systems. Normally, thermophilic biogas reactors are operated at temperatures from 52 to 56° C. Experiments using biogas reactors fed with cow manure showed that the same biogas yield found at 55° C could be obtained at 61° C after a long adaptation period. However, propionate degradation was inhibited by increasing the temperature.     

Effects of hydrogen and formate on the degradation of propionate and butyrate in thermophilic granules from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.

Degradation of propionate and butyrate in whole and disintegrated granules from a thermophilic (55 degrees C) upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor fed with acetate, propionate, and butyrate as substrates was examined. The propionate and butyrate degradation rates in whole granules were 1.16 and 4.0 mumol/min/g of volatile solids, respectively, and the rates decreased 35 and 25%, respectively, after disintegration of the granules. The effect of adding different hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria (both sulfate reducers and methanogens), some of which used formate in addition to hydrogen, to disintegrated granules was tested. Addition of either Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum delta H, a hydrogen-utilizing methanogen that does not use formate, or Methanobacterium sp. strain CB12, a hydrogen- and formate-utilizing methanogen, to disintegrated granules increased the degradation rate of both propionate and butyrate. Furthermore, addition of a thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium (a Desulfotomaculum sp. isolated in our laboratory) to disintegrated granules improved the degradation of both substrates even more than the addition of methanogens. By monitoring the hydrogen partial pressure in the cultures, a correlation between the hydrogen partial pressure and the degradation rate of propionate and butyrate was observed, showing a decrease in the degradation rate with increased hydrogen partial pressure. No significant differences in the stimulation of the degradation rates were observed when the disintegrated granules were supplied with methanogens that utilized hydrogen only or hydrogen and formate. This indicated that interspecies formate transfer was not important for stimulation of propionate and butyrate degradation.     

Combined removal of nitrate and carbon in granular sludge: Substrate competition and activities

Granular sludge from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating synthetic waste water containing a mixture of volatile fatty acids and nitrate showed a removal efficiency of nearly 100% for both nitrogen and carbon. This activity was achieved by a combined process of denitrification and methanogenesis under conditions of surplus carbon. Under batch conditions the two processes proceeded clearly separated in time with first denitrification dominating and excluding methanogenesis. However, as soon as nitrate was depleted, methane production was initiated, showing that the inhibition of methanogenesis by nitrate was reversible. Of the volatile fatty acids supplied to the reactor, i.e. acetate, propionate, and butyrate, the denitrifying population clearly preferred butyrate and propionate even though acetate could also be metabolized. Consequently, growth of syntrophic volatile fatty acid degraders was suppressed by the denitrifiers in cases of low C:N ratios in the medium, leaving acetate as the major substrate for methanogenesis.Abbreviations UASB upflow anaerobic sludge blanket - COD chemical oxygen demand - VFA volatile fatty     

Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: waste strength versus impact of mixing

We studied the effect of mode of mixing (biogas recirculation, impeller mixing, and slurry recirculation) and waste strength on the performance of laboratory scale digesters. The digesters were fed with 5% and 10% manure slurry, at a constant energy supply per unit volume (8 W/m3). The experiments were conducted in eight laboratory scale digesters, each having a working volume of 3.73 L, at a controlled temperature of 35+/-2 degrees C. Hydraulic retention time (HRT) was kept constant at 16.2 days, resulting in a total solids (TS) loading rate of 3.08 g/Ld and 6.2 g/Ld for 5% and 10% manure slurry feeds, respectively. Results showed that the unmixed and mixed digesters performed quite similarly when fed with 5% manure slurry and produced biogas at a rate of 0.84-0.94 L/Ld with a methane yield of 0.26-0.31 L CH4/g volatile solids (VS) loaded. This was possibly because of the low solids concentration in the case of 5% manure slurry, where mixing created by the naturally produced gas might be sufficient to provide adequate mixing. However, the effect of mixing and the mode of mixing became prominent in the case of the digesters fed with thicker manure slurry (10%). Digesters fed with 10% manure slurry and mixed by slurry recirculation, impeller, and biogas recirculation produced approximately 29%, 22% and 15% more biogas than unmixed digester, respectively. Deposition of solids inside the digesters was not observed in the case of 5% manure slurry, but it became significant in the case of 10% manure slurry. Therefore, mixing issue becomes more critical with thicker manure slurry.     

Anaerobic co-digestion of desugared molasses with cow manure; focusing on sodium and potassium inhibition

Desugared molasses (DM), a syrup residue from beet-molasses, was investigated for biogas production in both batch and in continuously-stirred tank reactor (CSTR) experiments. DM contained 2-3 times higher concentration of ions than normal molasses, which could inhibit the biogas process. The effect of sodium and potassium concentration on biogas production from manure was also investigated. Fifty percent inhibition occurred at sodium and potassium concentration of 11 and 28 g/L, respectively. The reactor experiments were carried out to investigate the biogas production from DM under different dilutions with water and co-digestion with manure. Stable operation at maximum methane yield of 300 mL-CH₄/gVS-added was obtained at a mixture of 5% DM in cow manure. The biogas process was inhibited at DM concentrations higher than 15%. Manure was a good base substrate for co-digestion, and a stable anaerobic digestion could be achieved by co-digesting DM with manure at the concentration below 15% DM.     

Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture

Biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, is mainly used in a gas motor for heat and electricity production. However, after removal of CO₂, biogas can be upgraded to natural gas quality, giving more utilization possibilities, such as utilization as autogas, or distant utilization by using the existing natural gas grid. The current study presents a new biological method for biogas upgrading in a separate biogas reactor, containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogens and fed with biogas and hydrogen. Both mesophilic‐ and thermophilic anaerobic cultures were enriched to convert CO₂ to CH₄ by addition of H₂. Enrichment at thermophilic temperature (55°C) resulted in CO₂ and H₂ bioconversion rate of 320 mL CH₄/(gVSS h), which was more than 60% higher than that under mesophilic temperature (37°C). Different dominant species were found at mesophilic‐ and thermophilic‐enriched cultures, as revealed by PCR–DGGE. Nonetheless, they all belonged to the order Methanobacteriales, which can mediate hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Biogas upgrading was then tested in a thermophilic anaerobic reactor under various operation conditions. By continuous addition of hydrogen in the biogas reactor, high degree of biogas upgrading was achieved. The produced biogas had a CH₄ content, around 95% at steady‐state, at gas (mixture of biogas and hydrogen) injection rate of 6 L/(L day). The increase of gas injection rate to 12 L/(L day) resulted in the decrease of CH₄ content to around 90%. Further study showed that by decreasing the gas–liquid mass transfer by increasing the stirring speed of the mixture the CH₄ content was increased to around 95%. Finally, the CH₄ content around 90% was achieved in this study with the gas injection rate as high as 24 L/(L day). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 2729–2736. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure

In order to obtain basic design criteria for anaerobic digesters of swine manure, the effects of different digesting temperatures, temperature shocks and feed loads, on the biogas yields and methane content were evaluated. The digester temperatures were set at 25, 30 and 35 degrees C, with four feed loads of 5%, 10%, 20% and 40% (feed volume/digester volume). At a temperature of 30 degrees C, the methane yield was reduced by only 3% compared to 35 degrees C, while a 17.4% reduction was observed when the digestion was performed at 25 degrees C. Ultimate methane yields of 327, 389 and 403 mL CH(4)/g VS(added) were obtained at 25, 30 and 35 degrees C, respectively; with moderate feed loads from 5% to 20% (V/V). From the elemental analysis of swine manure, the theoretical biogas and methane yields at standard temperature and pressure were 1.12L biogas/g VS(destroyed) and 0.724 L CH(4)/g VS(destroyed), respectively. Also, the methane content increased with increasing digestion temperatures, but only to a small degree. Temperature shocks from 35 to 30 degrees C and again from 30 to 32 degrees C led to a decrease in the biogas production rate, but it rapidly resumed the value of the control reactor. In addition, no lasting damage was observed for the digestion performance, once it had recovered.     

Feeding approaches for biogas production from animal wastes and industrial effluents

Different feeding approaches were applied to a 5 l anaerobic digester in order to improve the biogas production. During operation, the reactor was fed with a mixture (9.7% w/v total solids (TS) and 7.6% w/v volatile solids (VS) in average) of pig manure with fish oil waste and waste from bentonite of edible oil filtration process, at different intervals of 24, 12 and 4 h at 15 days of hydraulic retention time. Production and quality of the biogas were practically constant at 183.7 ml (average) of biogas per gram of volatile solids available in the reactor per day, and the best biogas composition was 73.6% v/v CH₄ and 26.4% v/v CO₂.     

The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review

Among different conversion processes for biomass, biological anaerobic digestion is one of the most economic ways to produce biogas from various biomass substrates. In addition to hydrolysis of polymeric substances, the activity and performance of the methanogenic bacteria is of paramount importance during methanogenesis. The aim of this paper is primarily to review the recent literature about the occurrence of both acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of particulate biomass to methane (not wastewater treatment), while this review does not cover the activity of the acetate oxidizing bacteria. Both acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens are essential for the last step of methanogenesis, but the reports about their roles during this phase of the process are very limited. Despite, some conclusions can still be drawn. At low concentrations of acetate, normally filamentous Methanosaeta species dominate, e.g., often observed in sewage sludge. Apparently, high concentrations of toxic ionic agents, like ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) and volatile fatty acids (VFA), inhibit preferably Methanosaetaceae and especially allow the growth of Methanosarcina species consisting of irregular cell clumps, e.g., in cattle manure. Thermophilic conditions can favour rod like or coccoid hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Thermophilic Methanosarcina species were also observed, but not thermophilic Methanosaetae. Other environmental factors could favour hydrogentrophic bacteria, e.g., short or low retention times in a biomass reactor. However, no general rules regarding process parameters could be derivated at the moment, which favours hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Presumably, it depends only on the hydrogen concentration, which is generally not mentioned in the literature.     

Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate

The potential of wheat straw hydrolysate for biogas production was investigated in continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactors. The hydrolysate originated as a side stream from a pilot plant pretreating wheat straw hydrothermally (195 °C for 10–12 min) for producing 2nd generation bioethanol [Kaparaju, P., Serrano, M., Thomsen, A.B., Kongjan, P., Angelidaki, I., 2009. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresource Technology 100 (9), 2562–2568]. Results from batch assays showed that hydrolysate had a methane potential of 384 ml/g-volatile solids (VS)_added. Process performance in CTSR and UASB reactors was investigated by varying hydrolysate concentration and/or organic loading rate (OLR). In CSTR, methane yields increased with increase in hydrolysate concentration and maximum yield of 297 ml/g-COD was obtained at an OLR of 1.9 g-COD/l d and 100% (v/v) hydrolysate. On the other hand, process performance and methane yields in UASB were affected by OLR and/or substrate concentration. Maximum methane yields of 267 ml/g-COD (COD removal of 72%) was obtained in UASB reactor when operated at an OLR of 2.8 g-COD/l d but with only 10% (v/v) hydrolysate. However, co-digestion of hydrolysate with pig manure (1:3 v/v ratio) improved the process performance and resulted in methane yield of 219 ml/g-COD (COD removal of 72%). Thus, anaerobic digestion of hydrolysate for biogas production was feasible in both CSTR and UASB reactor types. However, biogas process was affected by the reactor type and operating conditions.     

Effect of monensin and 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid on fatty acid metabolism and methane production from cattle manure

Summary The effect of monensin and 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BESA) on methane production from cattle manure and on volatile fatty acids metabolism was tested. At 10 days retention time 0.81 biogas per liter cattle manure and day were produced. Methanogenesis was inhibited 20% by 3 mM BESA per liter and 45% by 2–5 mg monensin per liter. When the digestion was inhibited with either of the both drugs, the acetate pool increased drastically. Like in untreated fermentations the propionate pool increased in BESA-inhibited fermentations for several hours after substrate addition. After 24 h however it did not decrease to the low level reached in non-inhibited fermentations. When monensin was the inhibitor, the propionate pool did not change for 15 h, but then decreased with the same rate as in the control experiment. Adaptation processes or detoxification may be responsible for the delayed degradation.The degradation of low concentrations of buty-rate to acetate and the turn over rates of the butyrate pool are almost identical in cattle manure containing BESA, monensin, or no inhibitor. The turn over of ¹⁴C-acetate from butyrate degradation is delayed in BESA and monensin inhibited fermentations.From the data presented it can be concluded, that BESA mainly inhibits the methanogens, while monensin seems to inhibit both, methanogenic and nonmethanogenic organisms. However, a fast adaptation to or detoxification of the antibiotic seems to occur.     

Changing Feeding Regimes To Demonstrate Flexible Biogas Production: Effects on Process Performance,Microbial Community Structure,and Methanogenesis Pathways

Flexible biogas production that adapts biogas output to energy demand can be regulated by changing feeding regimes. In this study, the effect of changes in feeding intervals on process performance, microbial community structure, and the methanogenesis pathway was investigated. Three different feeding regimes (once daily, every second day, and every 2 h) at the same organic loading rate were studied in continuously stirred tank reactors treating distiller''s dried grains with solubles. A larger amount of biogas was produced after feeding in the reactors fed less frequently (once per day and every second day), whereas the amount remained constant in the reactor fed more frequently (every 2 h), indicating the suitability of the former for the flexible production of biogas. Compared to the conventional more frequent feeding regimes, a methane yield that was up to 14% higher and an improved stability of the process against organic overloading were achieved by employing less frequent feeding regimes. The community structures of bacteria and methanogenic archaea were monitored by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of 16S rRNA and mcrA genes, respectively. The results showed that the composition of the bacterial community varied under the different feeding regimes, and the observed T-RFLP patterns were best explained by the differences in the total ammonia nitrogen concentrations, H₂ levels, and pH values. However, the methanogenic community remained stable under all feeding regimes, with the dominance of the Methanosarcina genus followed by that of the Methanobacterium genus. Stable isotope analysis showed that the average amount of methane produced during each feeding event by acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was not influenced by the three different feeding regimes.     

Occurrence of sulphate-reducing bacteria in human faeces and the relationship of dissimilatory sulphate reduction to methanogenesis in the large gut

Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) were enumerated in 40 faecal samples obtained from two different human populations in the United Kingdom and rural South Africa. Species able to metabolize acetate, lactate, propionate, butyrate, H2/CO2, succinate, pyruvate, valerate, ethanol and a glutamate/serine/alanine mixture were found in faeces from both populations. Although a variety of nutritionally and morphologically distinct species of SRB belonging to the genera Desulfotomaculum, Desulfobacter, Desulfomonas and Desulfobulbus were identified, Desulfovibrio types always predominated. Significant numbers of SRB were present only in faecal samples from subjects whose breath methane excretion was low or undetectable. Reduced or absent methanogenesis in the presence of SRB was confirmed in fermentation studies with faecal slurries. Fourteen of 20 (70%) British faecal samples contained SRB and the remainder produced methane. The reverse was the case with 20 rural black South Africans, where only three (15%) of the samples had significant levels of SRB; the remaining 85% produced methane. These results suggest that to a large extent, dissimilatory sulphate reduction and methanogenesis are mutually exclusive in the human large gut.     

Polyphasic Analyses of Methanogenic Archaeal Communities in Agricultural Biogas Plants

Knowledge of the microbial consortia participating in the generation of biogas, especially in methane formation, is still limited. To overcome this limitation, the methanogenic archaeal communities in six full-scale biogas plants supplied with different liquid manures and renewable raw materials as substrates were analyzed by a polyphasic approach. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out to quantify the methanogenic Archaea in the reactor samples. In addition, quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was used to support and complete the FISH analysis. Five of the six biogas reactors were dominated by hydrogenotrophic Methanomicrobiales. The average values were between 60 to 63% of archaeal cell counts (FISH) and 61 to 99% of archaeal 16S rRNA gene copies (Q-PCR). Within this order, Methanoculleus was found to be the predominant genus as determined by amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis. The aceticlastic family Methanosaetaceae was determined to be the dominant methanogenic group in only one biogas reactor, with average values for Q-PCR and FISH between 64% and 72%. Additionally, in three biogas reactors hitherto uncharacterized but potentially methanogenic species were detected. They showed closest accordance with nucleotide sequences of the hitherto unclassified CA-11 (85%) and ARC-I (98%) clusters. These results point to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis as a predominant pathway for methane synthesis in five of the six analyzed biogas plants. In addition, a correlation between the absence of Methanosaetaceae in the biogas reactors and high concentrations of total ammonia (sum of NH₃ and NH₄⁺) was observed.During the last decade the production of biogas from organic materials and residues has increased continuously in order to reduce the greenhouse gas emission resulting from the use of fossil energy sources. The energy-bearing substance of biogas is methane, which is produced as an end product of microbial anaerobic degradation of organic substrates, such as energy crops like maize, grains, grasses, or beets. Research for optimization of biogas production from renewable materials was initially focused on the evaluation of substrate eligibility and on the development and optimization of technical systems. However, biogas formation primarily depends on the structure and activity of the microbial community (28).The key microorganisms in the biogas formation process are the methane-generating microorganisms (methanogens). The capacity for methanogenesis is limited to members of the domain Archaea and, within this domain, on the phylum Euryarchaeota. With respect to the main metabolic precursors used, methanogens are usually divided into two groups: the aceticlastic methanogens that strictly metabolize acetate and the hydrogenotrophic methanogens that use H₂ or formate as an electron donor and CO₂ as a carbon source for their metabolism. Besides these major groups, certain methanogens are also able to convert methyl groups, methylamines, or methanol to methane (23, 40). The substrates for the methanogens are provided by several physiological groups of bacteria which degrade organic matter, sometimes in close syntrophic interaction with the methanogens (1).Several studies on the microbial diversity present in lab-scale biogas reactors supplied with renewable raw material (7, 57) have been recently published. However, analyses under laboratory conditions do not necessarily reflect conditions in full-scale reactors (35). Therefore, further research on the methanogenic community in full-scale biogas reactors is crucial.Generally, studies regarding the microbial community structure in full-scale biogas reactors have focused on different systems for wastewater treatment or classical biogas plants based on manure digestion (32, 38, 43). In most systems, approximately 70% of the carbon fixed in methane was derived from acetate. Only minor amounts, up to approximately 30%, were deduced from CO₂ (1, 42). Together with the presence of huge assemblages of Methanosarcina sp., it was assumed by some authors that aceticlastic methanogenesis was the predominant pathway for methane formation. Moreover, as shown by other studies, the relative contribution of H₂/CO₂ versus acetate as metabolic precursors for methanogens can be quite different in other anaerobic environments (10, 33, 37). However, the methanogenic microfloras in full-scale biogas reactors supplied with energy crops as a primary or sole substrate have rarely been studied (35, 37, 45).The aim of this study was to gain insight into the diversity of methane-producing Archaea in six full-scale biogas plants supplied with renewable raw material and different types of liquid manure as substrates. Therefore, a polyphasic approach with three different culture-independent techniques (fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], quantitative PCR [Q-PCR], and 16S rRNA gene analysis) to analyze methanogen diversity was carried out to overcome the known limitations of each single approach (15, 46). To analyze potential effects of different process parameters on the methanogenic archaeal community, the reactor performances were correlated with the apparent archaeal diversity.     

Electrolysis-enhanced anaerobic digestion of wastewater

This study demonstrates enhanced methane production from wastewater in laboratory-scale anaerobic reactors equipped with electrodes for water electrolysis. The electrodes were installed in the reactor sludge bed and a voltage of 2.8-3.5 V was applied resulting in a continuous supply of oxygen and hydrogen. The oxygen created micro-aerobic conditions, which facilitated hydrolysis of synthetic wastewater and reduced the release of hydrogen sulfide to the biogas. A portion of the hydrogen produced electrolytically escaped to the biogas improving its combustion properties, while another part was converted to methane by hydrogenotrophic methanogens, increasing the net methane production. The presence of oxygen in the biogas was minimized by limiting the applied voltage. At a volumetric energy consumption of 0.2-0.3 Wh/L_R, successful treatment of both low and high strength synthetic wastewaters was demonstrated. Methane production was increased by 10-25% and reactor stability was improved in comparison to a conventional anaerobic reactor.