Upregulated Expression of SSTR1 is Involved in Neuronal Apoptosis and is Coupled to the Reduction of bcl-2 Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Adult Rats

Somatostatins are peptide hormones that regulate diverse cellular processes, such as neurotransmission, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and endocrine signaling as well as inhibiting the release of many hormones and other secretory proteins. SSTR1 is a member of the superfamily of somatostatin receptors possessing seven-transmembrane segments. Aberrant expression of SSTR1 has been implicated in several human diseases, including pseudotumor cerebri, and oncogenic osteomalacia. In this study, we investigated a potential role of SSTR1 in the regulation of neuronal apoptosis in the course of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A rat ICH model in the caudate putamen was established and subjected to behavioral tests. Western blot and immunohistochemistry indicated a remarkable up-regulation of SSTR1 expression surrounding the hematoma after ICH. Double-labeled immunofluorescence showed that SSTR1 was mostly co-localized with neurons, and was rarely distributed in activated astrocytes and microglia. Additionally, SSTR1 co-localized with active-caspase-3 and bcl-2 around the hematoma. The expression of active-caspase-3 was parallel with that of SSTR1 in a time-dependent manner. In addition, SSTR1 knockdown specifically resulted in reduced neuronal apoptosis in PC12 cells. All our findings suggested that up-regulated SSTR1 contributed to neuronal apoptosis after ICH, which was accompanied with reduced expression of bcl-2.     

Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Glioblastoma Multiforme—A Suitable Target for Somatostatin Receptor-Based Imaging and Therapy?

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) have been shown to promote malignant growth and to correlate with poor prognosis. [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-NN′,N″,N′″-tetraacetic acid]-d-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) labeled with Gallium-68 selectively binds to somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) which is specifically expressed and up-regulated in activated macrophages. On the other hand, the role of SSTR2A expression on the cell surface of glioma cells has not been fully elucidated yet. The aim of this study was to non-invasively assess SSTR2A expression of both glioma cells as well as macrophages in GBM.

Methods

15 samples of patient-derived GBM were stained immunohistochemically for macrophage infiltration (CD68), proliferative activity (Ki67) as well as expression of SSTR2A. Anti-CD45 staining was performed to distinguish between resident microglia and tumor-infiltrating macrophages. In a subcohort, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE was performed and the semiquantitatively evaluated tracer uptake was compared to the results of immunohistochemistry.

Results

The amount of microglia/macrophages ranged from <10% to >50% in the tumor samples with the vast majority being resident microglial cells. A strong SSTR2A immunostaining was observed in endothelial cells of proliferating vessels, in neurons and neuropile. Only faint immunostaining was identified on isolated microglial and tumor cells. Somatostatin receptor imaging revealed areas of increased tracer accumulation in every patient. However, retention of the tracer did not correlate with immunohistochemical staining patterns.

Conclusion

SSTR2A seems not to be overexpressed in GBM samples tested, neither on the cell surface of resident microglia or infiltrating macrophages, nor on the surface of tumor cells. These data suggest that somatostatin receptor directed imaging and treatment strategies are less promising in GBM.     

Identification of distinct signalling pathways for somatostatin receptors SSTR1 and SSTR2 as revealed by microphysiometry.

Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are known to mediate diverse cellular responses. Most target cell express more than one SSTR isoform, making it difficult to define the signalling pathway used by individual receptor subtypes. Thus, we have expressed SSTR1 or SSTR2 in rat pituitary F4C1 cells which lack endogenous SSTRs. Using a silicon-based biosensor system, the Cytosensor microphysiometer, which measures the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in real time, we have studied the responses to SS mediated by either SSTR1 or SSTR2. In control F4C1 cells, SS had no effect on the basal ECAR. In transfected cells expressing only SSTR1, SS caused a unique decrease in ECAR in a concentration-dependent manner. Receptor-mediated decreases in ECAR have not been reported previously. In F4C1 cells expressing only SSTR2, SS induced a bidirectional ECAR response, a rapid increase followed by a decrease below basal. Two SS analogues, MK678 and CH275, induced characteristic ECAR responses with the expected receptor selectivities for SSTR1 or SSTR2. Pretreatment of F4C1 cells with pertussis toxin abolished the decreases in ECAR mediated by both SSTR1 and SSTR2, but only partially reduced the increase in ECAR mediated by SSTR2. The decrease in ECAR did not depend on a decrease in intracellular cAMP. The ECAR responses to SS were modestly attenuated by methylisobutylamiloride (MIA), an inhibitor of the ubiquitous Na(+)-H+ exchanger NHE1. Removal of extracellular Na+ greatly inhibited the ECAR responses to SS, demonstrating a role for both amiloride-sensitive and -insensitive Na(+)-dependent acid transport mechanisms in SS-induced extracellular acidification. In conclusion, we have identified and characterized different signalling pathways for SSTR1 and SSTR2 in pituitary cells as measured by microphysiometry.     

Feeding responses to central administration of several somatostatin analogs in chicks

Somatostatin is well known as an inhibitor of growth hormone release from the anterior pituitary. Its effects are exerted via 5 subtypes of receptors, which are named SSTR1 through 5. We recently reported that intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of somatostatin stimulates feeding behavior in chicks. However, the specific receptors which mediate this orexigenic effect have not been identified in chicks. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to identify the receptor subtypes involved in somatostatin-induced feeding using 5 somatostatin analogs. Chicks that received vapreotide and octreotide (less than 3 nmol), which are agonist of SSTR2 and SSTR5, increased their food intake. Additionally, chicks ICV injected with BIM23056 or L-817,818 (SSTR3 and SSTR5 agonists, respectively) also had increased food intake. However, ICV injection of the SSTR4 agonist L-803,087 did not cause an orexigenic effect, suggesting that SSTR4 might not be important in somatostatin-induced feeding behavior. In summary, results from this study may be interpreted as SSTR2, SSTR3 and SSTR5 are related to somatostatin-associated feeding behavior in chicks.     

Immunological Detection of Isoforms of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype, SSTR2

Abstract: Somatostatin (SRIF) induces its diverse physiological actions through interactions with different receptor subtypes. Multiple SRIF receptor subtypes have recently been cloned. To analyze the physical properties of receptor subtype SSTR2, two different peptide-directed antibodies were generated against SSTR2. Antibody “2e3,” directed against the peptide SSCTINWPGESGAWYT (residues 191–206), corresponding to a region in the predicted third extracellular domain of mouse SSTR2, and antibody “2i4,” directed against the peptide SGTEDGERSDS (residues 333–343) from the predicted cytoplasmic tail of mouse SSTR2, were developed. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing the mouse SSTR2 gene (CHOB), the antibody 2e3 recognized specifically a protein of 93-kDa protein by immunoblotting. No specific immunoreactivity was detected by 2e3 in nontransfected CHO cells or CHO cells stably expressing vector alone or human SSTR1 or mouse SSTR3 genes. The antibody 2i4 specifically immunoprecipitated SSTR2 solubilized from CHOB cells that could be labeled with the SSTR2-specific ligand ¹²⁵I-MK-678. Furthermore, both 2e3 and 2i4 specifically immunoprecipitated 93-kDa [³⁵S]methionine-labeled proteins from CHOB cells, indicating that they recognize the same proteins. In contrast to studies in CHOB cells, immunoblotting studies showed that 2e3 detected specifically a single 148-kDa protein from different regions of the rat brain that have previously been shown to express high levels of SSTR2 mRNA and SRIF receptors with high affinity for ¹²⁵I-MK-678. In contrast, no immunoreactivity was detected in rat kidney, liver, or lung, which do not express SSTR2. No 93-kDa protein was detected specifically in the rat brain. The 148-kDa protein detected by 2e3 is an SRIF receptor because 2e3 and 2i4 specifically immunoprecipitated solubilized rat brain SRIF receptors that could be reversibly labeled with ¹²⁵I-MK-678. As in rat brain, 2e3 interacted specifically with a single 148-kDa protein in rat pituitary, in the rat pancreatic cell line AR42J, and in the HEK 293 cell line derived from human kidney, all of which express SSTR2 mRNA and SRIF receptors with high affinity for ¹²⁵I-MK-678. These findings indicate that rat brain and pituitary, as well as a pancreatic and a kidney cell line, express primarily a form of SSTR2 different from CHOB cells. The multiple forms of SSTR2 may result from differential post-translational processing of SSTR2 because 2e3 immunoprecipitated 41-kDa in vitro translation products generated from mRNA extracted from CHOB and AR42J cells. This 41-kDa protein has the predicted size of unprocessed SSTR2. These results demonstrate that 2e3 and 2i4 antibodies interact specifically with SSTR2. Detection of two different size proteins by the SSTR2 peptide-directed antibodies suggests the existence of multiple forms of SSTR2.     

子宫内膜癌组织中生长抑素受体、VEGF的表达及其与血管形成的关系

目的探讨生长抑素受体（somatostatin receptor,SSTR）、血管内皮生长因子（vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF）在子宫内膜癌组织中的表达及其与肿瘤血管形成的关系。方法应用免疫组织化学方法检测60例子宫内膜癌组织中SSTR各亚型、VEGF及CD34标记的微血管密度（microvessel denisity,MVD）的表达情况,探讨其与子宫内膜癌临床病理学特征及肿瘤血管形成的关系。结果在60例子宫内膜癌组织中,SSTR各亚型（SSTR1、SSTR2、SSTR3、SSTR4及SSTR5）的阳性表达率分别为70．0％,15．0％。21．7％,23．3％及18．3％;SSTR3、SSTR4在中高分化组表达阳性率明显高于低分化组（P〈0．05）。VEGF的阳性表达率为83．3％,VEGF在低分化组表达阳性率明显高于中高分化组、深肌层浸润组表达阳性率明显高于浅肌层浸润组、FIGO分期≥II期组表达阳性率明显高于I期组（P〈0．05）。子宫内膜癌组MVD（44．85±15．78）明显高于正常子宫内膜组MVD（18．96±4．30）（P〈0．01）。SSTR5的表达与VEGF呈负相关,VEGF阳性表达组子宫内膜癌组织MVD高于VEGF阴性组。结论联合检测SSTR和VEGF对子宫内膜癌预后的评估有一定临床意义。生长抑素类似物（somatostatin analogs,SSTA）可能为子宫内膜癌的诊治提供新的靶点。     

Endosomal trafficking of the G protein-coupled receptor somatostatin receptor 3

Intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulates their surface availability and determines cellular response to agonists. Rab GTPases regulate membrane trafficking and identifying Rab networks controlling GPCR trafficking is essential for understanding GPCR signaling. We used real time imaging to show that somatostatin receptor 3 (SSTR3) traffics through Rab4-, Rab21-, and Rab11-containing endosomes, but largely bypasses Rab5 and Rab7 endosomes. We show that SSTR3 rapidly traffics through Rab4 endosomes but moves slower through Rab21 and Rab11 endosomes. SSTR3 passage through each endosomal compartment is regulated by the cognate Rab since expression of the inactive Rab4/S22N, Rab21/T33N, and Rab11/S25N inhibits SSTR3 trafficking. Thus, Rab4, Rab21, and Rab11 may represent therapeutic targets to modulate surface availability of SSTR3 for agonist binding. Our novel finding that Rab21 regulates SSTR3 trafficking suggests that Rab21 may play a role in trafficking of other GPCRs.     

δ-Opioid Receptor and Somatostatin Receptor-4 Heterodimerization: Possible Implications in Modulation of Pain Associated Signaling

Pain relief is the principal action of opioids. Somatostatin (SST), a growth hormone inhibitory peptide is also known to alleviate pain even in cases when opioids fail. Recent studies have shown that mice are prone to sustained pain and devoid of analgesic effect in the absence of somatostatin receptor 4 (SSTR4). In the present study, using brain slices, cultured neurons and HEK-293 cells, we showed that SSTR4 and δ-Opioid receptor (δOR) exist in a heteromeric complex and function in synergistic manner. SSTR4 and δOR co-expressed in cortical/striatal brain regions and spinal cord. Using cultured neuronal cells, we describe the heterogeneous complex formation of SSTR4 and δOR at neuronal cell body and processes. Cotransfected cells display inhibition of cAMP/PKA and co-activation of SSTR4 and δOR oppose receptor trafficking induced by individual receptor activation. Furthermore, downstream signaling pathways either associated with withdrawal or pain relief are modulated synergistically with a predominant role of SSTR4. Inhibition of cAMP/PKA and activation of ERK1/2 are the possible cellular adaptations to prevent withdrawal induced by chronic morphine use. Our results reveal direct intra-membrane interaction between SSTR4 and δOR and provide insights for the molecular mechanism for the anti-nociceptive property of SST in combination with opioids as a potential therapeutic approach to avoid undesirable withdrawal symptoms.     

Somatostatin stimulates ductal bile absorption and inhibits ductal bile secretion in mice via SSTR2 on cholangiocytes

With an in vitro model using enclosedintrahepatic bile duct units (IBDUs) isolated from wild-type andsomatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype 2 knockout mice, we tested theeffects of somatostatin, secretin, and a selective SSTR2 agonist(L-779976) on fluid movement across the bile duct epithelial celllayer. By RT-PCR, four of five known subtypes of SSTRs (SSTR1,SSTR2A/2B, SSTR3, and SSTR4, but not SSTR5) were detected incholangiocytes in wild-type mice. In contrast, SSTR2A/2B werecompletely depleted in the SSTR2 knockout mice whereas SSTR1, SSTR3 andSSTR4 were expressed in these cholangiocytes. Somatostatin induced adecrease of luminal area of IBDUs isolated from wild-type mice,reflecting net fluid absorption; L-779976 also induced a comparabledecrease of luminal area. No significant decrease of luminal area byeither somatostatin or L-779976 was observed in IBDUs from SSTR2knockout mice. Secretin, a choleretic hormone, induced a significantincrease of luminal area of IBDUs of wild-type mice, reflecting netfluid secretion; somatostatin and L-779976 inhibited (P < 0.01) secretin-induced fluid secretion. The inhibitory effect ofboth somatostatin and L-779976 on secretin-induced IBDUsecretion was absent in IBDUs of SSTR2 knockout mice. Somatostatin induced an increase of intracellular cGMP and inhibitedsecretin-stimulated cAMP synthesis in cholangiocytes; depletion ofSSTR2 blocked these effects of somatostatin. These data suggest thatsomatostatin regulates ductal bile formation in mice not only byinhibition of ductal fluid secretion but also by stimulation of ductalfluid absorption via interacting with SSTR2 on cholangiocytes, aprocess involving the intracellular cAMP/cGMP second messengers.

     

Somatostatin inhibits insulin release via SSTR2 in hamster clonal beta-cells and pancreatic islets

Somatostatin (SST) inhibits pancreatic endocrine secretion. It is generally accepted that SSTR2 and SSTR5 mediate the inhibition of glucagon and insulin release, respectively. The present study was performed to test the hypothesis that SSTR2, but not SSTR5, mediates SST-induced inhibition of insulin release in hamster beta-cells. Both hamster clonal beta-cells HIT-T15 and pancreatic islets were used to test this hypothesis. Both SST and a nonpeptide SSTR2 agonist L-779,976 (1-100 nM) inhibited insulin release from HIT-T15 and islets in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, nonpeptide agonists for SSTR1, 3, 4 and 5 at the highest concentration studied (1 microM) failed to inhibit insulin release. PRL-2903, a peptide SSTR2 antagonist (0.1-1 muicroM), antagonized SST-induced inhibition of insulin release in a concentration-dependent manner. Taken together, we conclude that, in hamster beta-cells, SST inhibits insulin release via SSTR2 but not SSTR5.     

Interaction of brain somatostatin receptors with the PDZ domains of PSD-95

Using peptide affinity purification, we identified an interaction between somatostatin receptors SSTR4 and SSTR1 and PDZ domains 1 and 2 of the postsynaptic proteins postsynaptic density protein of 95kDa (PSD-95) and PSD-93. The existence of the SSTR4/PSD-95 complex was verified by coimmunoprecipitation from transfected cells and solubilized brain membranes. In neurons, dendritically localized SSTR4 partially colocalizes with postsynaptic PSD-95. As functional parameters of the receptor, such as coupling to potassium channels, are not affected by the interaction with PSD-95, the association may serve to localize the receptor to postsynaptic sites.     

生长抑素受体的生理功能及动力学特征

生长抑素受体家族(somatostatin receptors,SSTRs)是一类介导生长抑素及其类似物,具有多种生物学效应的G蛋白偶联受体家族,其生理功能和作用机制长期以来倍受关注.研究表明,这些细胞膜上存在的特定膜受体包括SSTR1、SSTR2、SSTR3、SSTR4以及SSTR5,可以通过cAMP、PTP和MAPK信号通路,在调控GH分泌、诱导细胞凋亡、抑制肿瘤细胞增生、抑制胰岛素作用和抑制细胞生长等生物学过程发挥重要的作用,同时表现出与其它G蛋白偶联受体性质相似的动力学特征.本文将SSTRs的结构、分布和生理功能、配体选择性、下游信号通路,以及该受体家族的动力学特征最新研究进展作一综述.     

New somatostatin-drug conjugates for effective targeting pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer poorly responds to available drugs, and finding novel approaches to target this cancer type is of high significance. Here, based on a common property of pancreatic cancer cells to express somatostatin receptors (SSTR), we designed drug conjugates with novel somatostatin-derived cyclic peptides (SSTp) with broad selectivity towards SSTR types to facilitate drug targeting of the pancreatic cancer cells specifically. Uptake of our newly designed SSTps was facilitated by SSTRs expressed in the pancreatic cancers, including SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4 and SSTR5. Three major drugs were conjugated to our best SSTps that served as delivery vehicles, including Camptothecin (CPT), Combretastatin-4A (COMB) and Azatoxin (AZA). All designed drug conjugates demonstrated penetration to pancreatic cancer cell lines, and significant toxicity towards them. Furthermore, the drug conjugates specifically accumulated in tumors in the animal xenograft model, though some accumulation was also seen in kidney. Overall these findings lay the basis for development of novel drug series that could target the fatal pancreatic cancer.     

SSTR2 mediates the somatostatin-induced increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration and insulin secretion in the presence of arginine vasopressin in clonal beta-cell HIT-T15

The effects of somatostatin (SRIF) are mediated through the seven transmembrane receptor family that signals via Gi/Go. To date, five distinct SRIF receptors have been characterized and designated SSTR1-5. We have characterized the SRIF receptor that mediates the increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and insulin secretion in HIT-T15 cells (Simian virus 40-transformed Syrian hamster islets) using high affinity, subtype selective agonists for SSTR1 (L-797,591), SSTR2 (L-779,976), SSTR3 (L-796,778), SSTR4 (L-803,087), SSTR5 (L-817,818) and PRL-2903, a specific SSTR2 antagonist. In the presence of arginine vasopressin (AVP), SRIF increased [Ca(2+)](i) and insulin secretion. Treatment with the SSTR2 agonist L-779,976 resulted in similar responses to SRIF. In addition, L-779,976 increased both [Ca(2+)](i) and insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with L-779,976 alone did not alter [Ca(2+)](i) or basal insulin secretion. In the presence of AVP, all other SRIF receptor agonists failed to increase [Ca(2+)](i) and insulin secretion. The effects of SRIF and L-779,976 were abolished by the SSTR2 antagonist PRL-2903. Our results suggest that the mechanism underlying SRIF-induced insulin secretion in HIT-T15 cells be mediated through the SSTR2.     

Subtypes of the somatostatin receptor assemble as functional homo- and heterodimers

The existence of receptor dimers has been proposed for several G protein-coupled receptors. However, the question of whether G protein-coupled receptor dimers are necessary for activating or modulating normal receptor function is unclear. We address this question with somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) of which there are five distinct subtypes. By using transfected mutant and wild type receptors, as well as endogenous receptors, we provide pharmacological, biochemical, and physical evidence, based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis, that activation by ligand induces SSTR dimerization, both homo- and heterodimerization with other members of the SSTR family, and that dimerization alters the functional properties of the receptor such as ligand binding affinity and agonist-induced receptor internalization and up-regulation. Double label confocal fluorescence microscopy showed that when SSTR1 and SSTR5 subtypes were coexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells and treated with agonist they underwent internalization and were colocalized in cytoplasmic vesicles. SSTR5 formed heterodimers with SSTR1 but not with SSTR4 suggesting that heterodimerization is a specific process that is restricted to some but not all receptor subtype combinations. Direct protein interaction between different members of the SSTR subfamily defines a new level of molecular cross-talk between subtypes of the SSTR and possibly related receptor families.     

Somatostatin receptor subtype-dependent regulation of nitric oxide release: involvement of different intracellular pathways

We reported previously that, in addition to direct effects, somatostatin (SST) affects tumor growth inhibiting the tumoral neoangiogenesis, via an interference with NO synthesis. Here, we analyzed the effects of SST on nitric oxide (NO) production induced by different agonists [basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin, cholecystokinin (CCK)] and the intracellular signaling involved, using Chinese hamster ovary-k1 cells stably transfected with individual SSTR1-SSTR4. bFGF and insulin induced endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity via the generation of ceramide or the Akt-dependent phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, respectively. CCK regulates neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity in a Ca++-dependent manner. SST inhibited NO production stimulated by bFGF through SST receptor 1 (SSTR1), SSTR2, and SSTR3 and by CCK through SSTR2 and SSTR3. In all the cell lines, SST treatment did not modify NO synthesis induced by insulin. SSTR4 activation was not effective on any of the stimuli tested. The effects on bFGF-induced NO production were downstream from receptor phosphorylation and ceramide synthesis. SSTR2 and -3 on CCK activity were related to the inhibition of intracellular Ca++ mobilization, whereas the lack of effects on insulin was paralleled by the absence of SST activity on Akt phosphorylation. These data, identifying for the first time a selective receptor subtype-inhibitory role of SST on NO generation, may open new perspectives in the use of SST agonists to control tumoral angiogenesis.     

Structural insights into ligand recognition and selectivity of somatostatin receptors

Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) play versatile roles in inhibiting the secretion of multiple hormones such as growth hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone, and thus are considered as targets for treating multiple tumors. Despite great progress made in therapeutic development against this diverse receptor family, drugs that target SSTRs still show limited efficacy with preferential binding affinity and conspicuous side-effects. Here, we report five structures of SSTR2 and SSTR4 in different states, including two crystal structures of SSTR2 in complex with a selective peptide antagonist and a non-peptide agonist, respectively, a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of G_i1-bound SSTR2 in the presence of the endogenous ligand SST-14, as well as two cryo-EM structures of G_i1-bound SSTR4 in complex with SST-14 and a small-molecule agonist J-2156, respectively. By comparison of the SSTR structures in different states, molecular mechanisms of agonism and antagonism were illustrated. Together with computational and functional analyses, the key determinants responsible for ligand recognition and selectivity of different SSTR subtypes and multiform binding modes of peptide and non-peptide ligands were identified. Insights gained in this study will help uncover ligand selectivity of various SSTRs and accelerate the development of new molecules with better efficacy by targeting SSTRs.Subject terms: Cryoelectron microscopy, X-ray crystallography     

Intracellular degradation of somatostatin-14 following somatostatin-receptor3-mediated endocytosis in rat insulinoma cells

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) endocytosis influences cellular responsiveness to agonist stimulation and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, a common diagnostic imaging technique. Recently, we have shown that SSTR1 is differentially regulated in the endocytic and recycling pathway of pancreatic cells after agonist stimulation. Additionally, SSTR1 accumulates and releases internalized somatostatin-14 (SST-14) as an intact and biologically active ligand. We also demonstrated that SSTR2A was sequestered into early endosomes, whereas internalized SST-14 was degraded by endosomal peptidases and not routed into lysosomal degradation. Here, we examined the fate of peptide agonists in rat insulinoma cells expressing SSTR3 by biochemical methods and confocal laser scanning microscopy. We found that [(125)I]Tyr11-SST-14 rapidly accumulated in intracellular vesicles, where it was degraded in an ammonium chloride-sensitive manner. In contrast, [(125)I]Tyr1-octreotide accumulated and was released as an intact peptide. Rhodamine-B-labeled SST-14, however, was rapidly internalized into endosome-like vesicles, and fluorescence signals colocalized with the lysosomal marker protein cathepsinD. Our data show that SST-14 was cointernalized with SSTR3, was uncoupled from the receptor, and was sorted into an endocytic degradation pathway, whereas octreotide was recycled as an intact peptide. Chronic stimulation of SSTR3 also induced time-dependent downregulation of the receptor. Thus, the intracellular processing of internalized SST-14 and the regulation of SSTR3 markedly differ from the events mediated by the other SSTR subtypes.     

Isolation, characterization, and distribution of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR 2) mRNA in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and regulation of its expression by glucose

In this study, cDNA for a somatostatin receptor variant (somatostatin receptor subtype 2, SSTR 2) was isolated, cloned, and sequenced from rainbow trout. A 1821-nt cDNA was isolated and found to contain a single initiation site 387-nt from the most 5' end, an open reading frame of 1116-nt, and a single putative polyadenylation site 189-nt from the most 3' end. The encoded protein contains 372 amino acids and contains seven membrane-spanning domains. Based on structural analysis, the protein was identified as a subtype 2 SSTR. These data support the emergence of a multigenic SSTR family early in the course of vertebrate evolution, concomitant with or perhaps prior to the divergence of boney fish. The distribution of SSTR 2 mRNA in tissues was determined by quantitative real time-PCR (QRT-PCR). SSTR 2 was most abundant in the brain (where it was detected in the telencephalon, optic tectum, and hypothalamus), skeletal muscle, and liver, but it also was present in the endocrine pancreas (Brockmann body) and various regions of the gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach, intestine). SSTR 2 mRNA was most abundant in the brain, muscle, and liver. In vitro the Brockmann body and liver with increasing concentrations of glucose (1, 4, 10mM) resulted in increased expression of SSTR 2 mRNA. These findings contribute to the understanding of the evolution of the SSTR family and provide insight into the roles of SSTR 2 in fish.