LINC01436, regulating miR‐585 and FBXO11, is an oncogenic lncRNA in the progression of gastric cancer

Accumulating studies have indicated that long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial modulators in cancer biology. In this work, we investigated the function and related mechanisms of LINC01436 in the progression of gastric cancer (GC). We demonstrated that LINC01436 was significantly up‐regulated in cancerous tissues of GC samples, and its overexpression was correlated with a worse prognosis for the patients. In the GC cell line BGC823 cells, LINC01436 knockdown repressed the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells; conversely, in GC cell line AGS cells, overexpression of LINC01436 showed the opposite effects. We then demonstrated that miR‐585, a tumor suppressor, could bind to both LINC01436 and the 3′‐UTR of F‐box protein 11 (FBOX11), and LINC01436 was proved to sponge miR‐585 and repress it, and indirectly promoted the expression of FBOX11. Collectively, these results suggested that LINC01436 was an oncogenic lncRNA in GC and promoted proliferation and metastasis of GC cell via regulating miR‐585 and FBOX11.     

LINC00473 antagonizes the tumour suppressor miR‐195 to mediate the pathogenesis of Wilms tumour via IKKα

Objectives

Although dramatic improvements of overall survival has achieved in patients with favourable histology Wilms tumour, disease recurrence is still the main cause of cancer‐related death in childhood. Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as oncogenes or tumour suppressors are dysregulated during carcinogenesis. However, the role of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of Wilms tumour is unknown. Here, an lncRNA LINC00473 signature that functioned as oncogene was identified in Wilms tumour.

Methods

Wilms tumour (n = 15) and relative normal tissues were collected. The LINC00473 expression and function in Wilms tumour was determined. The LncRNA‐miRNA network of LINC00473 was analysed in vitro and vivo.

Results

We uncovered that the expression of LINC00473 was elevated in tumour tissues than that in relative normal tissues. Higher LINC00473 levels correlated to higher stage and unfavourable histology Wilms tumour. Mechanistically, knockdown of LINC00473 inhibited cell vitality and induced Bcl‐2‐dependent apoptosis and G1/S arrest via CDK2 and cyclin D1. Moreover, LINC00473 harboured binding sites for miR‐195 and limited miR‐195 availability in a dose‐dependent manner. Forced expression of miR‐195 impaired tumour survival and metastasis, which, however, could be restored by LINC00473. Furthermore, IKKα was the downstream of LINC00473/miR‐195 signals and could be directly targeted by miR‐195 to participate LINC00473‐induced tumour progression. Loss‐of‐function of LINC00473 in vivo effectively promoted the regression of Wilms tumour via miR‐195/IKKα‐mediated growth inhibition.

Conclusion

LINC00473 as an oncogene is up‐regulated to participate into the molecular pathogenesis of Wilms tumour via miR‐195/IKKα.     

LINC01303 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate EZH2 expression by sponging miR‐101‐3p in gastric cancer

Long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) is one of the important regulators of many malignancies. However, the biological function and clinical significance of a large number of lncRNAs in gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we analysed the TCGA data to find that LINC01303 is significantly up‐regulated in gastric cancer tissues. However, the biological function of LINC01303 in GC remains unknown. In our study, we found that the expression of LINC01303 was significantly higher in GC tissues than in adjacent tissues by real‐time quantitative PCR. We can significantly inhibit the malignant proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells by silencing LINC01303 expression. In addition, LINC01303 knockdown can also inhibit GC growth in vivo. After the bioinformatics analysis, we found that LINC01303 can be used as a miR‐101‐3p sponge to competitively adsorb miR‐101‐3p with EZH2. Therefore, our results indicate that LINC01303 promotes the expression of EZH2 by inhibiting miR‐101‐3p activity and promotes GC progression. In summary, in this study, we demonstrated for the first time that the LINC01303/miR‐101‐3p/EZH2 axis promotes GC progression.     

Long non‐coding RNA LINC01535 promotes cervical cancer progression via targeting the miR‐214/EZH2 feedback loop

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have shown critical roles in multiple cancers via competitively binding common microRNAs. miR‐214 has been proved to play tumour suppressive roles in various cancers, including cervical cancer. In this study, we identified that lncRNA LINC01535 physically binds miR‐214, relieves the repressive roles of miR‐214 on its target EZH2, and therefore up‐regulates EZH2 protein expression. Intriguingly, we also found that EZH2 directly represses the expression of miR‐214. Thus, miR‐214 and EZH2 form double negative regulatory loop. Through up‐regulating EZH2, LINC01535 further represses miR‐214 expression. Functional experiments showed that enhanced expression of LINC01535 promotes cervical cancer cell growth, migration and invasion in vitro and cervical cancer xenograft growth in vivo. Reciprocally, LINC01535 knockdown suppresses cervical cancer cell growth, migration and invasion. Activation of the miR‐214/EZH2 regulatory loop by overexpression of miR‐214 or silencing of EZH2 reverses the roles of LINC01535 in promoting cervical canc`er cell growth, migration and invasion in vitro and cervical cancer xenograft growth in vivo. Clinically, LINC01535 is significantly up‐regulated in cervical cancer tissues and correlated with advanced clinical stage and poor prognosis. Moreover, the expression of LINC01535 is reversely associated with the expression of miR‐214 and positively associated with the expression of EZH2 in cervical cancer tissues. In conclusion, this study reveals that LINC01535 promotes cervical cancer progression via repressing the miR‐214/EZH2 regulatory loop.     

Long non‐coding RNA LINC01225 promotes proliferation,invasion and migration of gastric cancer via Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway

Emerging evidence has classified the aberrant expression of long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as a basic signature of various malignancies including gastric cancer (GC). LINC01225 has been shown to act as a hepatocellular carcinoma‐related gene, with its expression pattern and biological function not clarified in GC. Here, we verified that LINC01225 was up‐regulated in tumour tissues and plasma of GC. Analysis with clinicopathological information suggested that up‐regulation of LINC01225 was associated with advanced disease and poorer overall survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that plasma LINC01225 had a moderate accuracy for diagnosis of GC. In addition, knockdown of LINC01225 led to retardation of cell proliferation, invasion and migration, and overexpression of LINC01225 showed the opposite effects. Mechanistic investigations showed that LINC01225 silencing inhibited epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and attenuated Wnt/β‐catenin signalling of GC. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Wnt1 or suppression of GSK‐3β abolished the si‐LINC01225‐mediated suppression against EMT, thereby promoting cell proliferation, invasion and migration of GC. In conclusion, LINC01225 promotes the progression of GC through Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway, and it may serve as a potential target or strategy for diagnosis or treatment of GC.     

LINC00339 promotes gastric cancer progression by elevating DCP1A expression via inhibiting miR-377-3p

Up to date, the mechanism of gastric cancer (GC) development is poorly understood. This study was to demonstrate the effects of LINC00339 on GC progression. Here, we found that LINC00339 was overexpressed expressed in GC tissues and predicted poor outcome. By CCK8, colony formation and Transwell assays, we showed LINC00339 knockdown suppressed GC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. Flow cytometry analysis (FACS) indicated that LINC00339 knockdown induced tumor cell apoptosis. Besides, we utilized the xenograft assay and found that LINC00339 depletion led to decreased tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, miR-377-3p was found to be inhibited by LINC00339. And LINC00339 suppressed miR-377-3p to upregulate DCP1A, which consequently promoted GC progression. In conclusion, LINC00339 promotes gastric cancer progression by elevating DCP1A expression via inhibiting miR-377-3p.     

SNRPA enhances tumour cell growth in gastric cancer through modulating NGF expression

Objectives

SNRPA is a protein component of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1 snRNP) complex, which takes part in the splicing of pre‐mRNAs. Its expression and function in tumour remain unknown. Herein, we elucidated the functional contribution of SNRPA to the progression of gastric cancer (GC).

Materials and methods

SNRPA expression was investigated in a GC tissue microarray by immunohistochemical staining. Cell proliferation was evaluated by CCK‐8, colony formation and EdU incorporation assays. A mouse xenograft model was used to detect the tumourigenicity. Gene expression profiling was performed and then the potential target genes were verified by quantitative real‐time PCR and western blot analyses. The functional relevance between SNRPA and its target gene was examined by cell growth assays.

Results

SNRPA expression was higher in tumour tissues than in matched normal gastric mucosa tissues, and it was positively correlated with the tumour size and progression. High SNRPA expression indicated poor prognosis of GC patients. Silencing SNRPA in GC cells markedly inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in a xenograft model, while overexpressing SNRPA exhibited opposite results. Moreover, we identified NGF (Nerve growth factor) as a downstream effector of SNRPA and further proved that NGF was crucial for SNRPA‐mediated GC cell growth.

Conclusions

These findings suggested that SNRPA may contribute to GC progression via NGF and could be a prognostic biomarker for GC.

     

Analysis of key genes and signaling pathways involved in Helicobacter pylori‐associated gastric cancer based on The Cancer Genome Atlas database and RNA sequencing data

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with the development of gastric cancer, although the mechanism is unclear. Herein, this study aimed to clarify the key genes and signaling pathways involved in H. pylori pathogenesis based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and RNA sequencing analysis.

Materials and Methods

Forty‐nine gastric cancer samples (16 with H. pylori and 33 without H. pylori) and 35 cancer‐adjacent normal samples from TCGA database were analyzed by bioinformatics. The differentially expressed genes between H. pylori‐positive and H. pylori‐negative patients were verified in 18 gastric cancer (GC) samples (9 with H. pylori and 9 without H. pylori), which were analyzed using RNA sequencing. Survival analysis was carried out to explore associations between the differentially expressed genes and prognosis. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to determine the signaling pathways associated with H. pylori.

Results

The baseline level of clinical features from TCGA database and RNA sequencing showed no differences between the H. pylori‐positive and H. pylori‐negative GC groups (P > 0.05). TP53 was shown to be upregulated in the H. pylori‐positive group in both TCGA database and RNA sequencing data, which also showed higher expression in the GC tissues than in adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.05). CCDC151, CHRNB2, GMPR2, HDGFRP2, and VSTM2L were shown to be downregulated in the H. pylori‐positive group by both TCGA database and RNA sequencing, which also showed lower expression in the GC tissues than in adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.05). GC patients with low expression levels of HDGFRP2 had a poor prognosis (P < 0.05). Thirty‐three signaling pathways and 10 biological processes were found to be positively associated with H. pylori infection (P < 0.05, FDR < 0.05).

Conclusions

These results indicate that some genes (TP53, CCDC151, CHRNB2, GMPR2, HDGFRP2, VSTM2L) and previously unidentified signaling pathways (eg, the Hippo signaling pathway) might play an important role in H. pylori‐associated GC.     

The novel role and function of LINC01235 in metastasis of gastric cancer cells by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition

LncRNAs play a vital role in the tumorigenesis of gastric cancer (GC). This study determined that LINC01235 expression has greater fold changes by analyzing TCGA RNA-Seq data. The qRT-PCR assay confirmed that LINC01235 is significantly over-expressed in GC cells and tissues. Additionally, the overall survival analysis showed that patients with a higher LINC01235 expression had a poorer prognosis than those with a lower LINC01235 expression. Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high LINC01235 expression is positively correlated with poor prognosis. Moreover, LINC01235 was an independent poor prognostic marker for GC in multivariate Cox analysis. In vitro assays suggested that LINC01235 knockdown suppresses GC cell migration and invasion. GSEA revealed that high LINC01235 expression is strongly enriched in the EMT pathway. Western blotting results revealed that LINC01235 silencing decreases the expression of EMT-induced proteins. In conclusion, LINC01235 can promote GC cell metastasis via EMT and function as a prognostic biomarker.     

Loss of PPM1F expression predicts tumour recurrence and is negatively regulated by miR‐590‐3p in gastric cancer

Objectives

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as small non‐coding RNA molecules act by negatively regulating their target genes. Recent studies have shown that protein phosphatase Mg2+/Mn2+‐dependent 1F (PPM1F) plays a critical role in cancer metastasis. But, the regulation mechanisms of PPM1F by miRNAs in gastric cancer (GC) remain undefined.

Methods

The correlation of PPM1F or miR‐590‐3p (miR‐590) expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis of the patients with GC was analysed by TCGA RNA‐sequencing data. The miRNAs that target PPM1F gene were identified by bioinformatics and Spearman correlation analysis, and the binding site between miR‐590 and PPM1F 3′UTR was confirmed by dual luciferase assay. MTT and Transwell assays were conducted to evaluate the effects of miR‐590 or (and) PPM1F on cell proliferation and invasion.

Results

We found that PPM1F expression was downregulated in GC tissues and cell lines and was correlated with tumour recurrence in patients with GC. The decreased expression of PPM1F was attributed to the dysregulation of miR‐590 expression rather than its genetic or epigenetic alterations. Overexpression of miR‐590 promoted cell proliferation and invasion capability of GC cells, while knockdown of miR‐590 reversed these effects. Moreover, PPM1F was validated as a direct target of miR‐590 and counteracted the tumour‐promoting effects caused by miR‐590. The expression of miR‐590 presented the negative correlation with PPM1F expression and acted as an independent prognostic factor for tumour recurrence in patients with GC.

Conclusion

PPM1F may function as a suppressive factor and is negatively regulated by miR‐590 in GC.

     

Epigenetic silencing of DACH1 induces the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by activating TGF‐β signalling

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common malignancy in males and the fifth most common malignancy in females worldwide. DACH1 is frequently methylated in hepatic and colorectal cancer. To further understand the regulation and mechanism of DACH1 in GC, eight GC cell lines, eight cases of normal gastric mucosa, 98 cases of primary GC and 50 cases of adjacent non‐tumour tissues were examined. Methylation‐specific PCR, western blot, transwell assay and xenograft mice were used in this study. Loss of DACH1 expression correlated with promoter region methylation in GC cells, and re‐expression was induced by 5‐Aza‐2′‐deoxyazacytidine. DACH1 is methylated in 63.3% (62/98) of primary GC and 38% (19/50) of adjacent non‐tumour tissues, while no methylation was found in normal gastric mucosa. Methylation of DACH1 correlated with reduced expression of DACH1 (P < 0.01), late tumour stage (stage III/IV) (P < 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). DACH1 expression inhibited epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis by inhibiting transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β signalling and suppressed GC cell proliferation through inducing G2/M phase arrest. The tumour size is smaller in DACH1‐expressed BGC823 cell xenograft mice than in unexpressed group (P < 0.01). Restoration of DACH1 expression also sensitized GC cells to docetaxel. These studies suggest that DACH1 is frequently methylated in human GC and expression of DACH1 was controlled by promoter region methylation. DACH1 suppresses GC proliferation, invasion and metastasis by inhibiting TGF‐β signalling pathways both in vitro and in vivo. Epigenetic silencing DACH1 may induce GC cells' resistance to docetaxel.     

Up-regulation of long intergenic noncoding RNA 01296 in ovarian cancer impacts invasion,apoptosis and cell cycle distribution via regulating EMT

BackgroundRecently, long intergenic non-coding RNA 01296 (LINC01296) has been demonstrated to regulate the initiation and progression of several cancers, but the functions of LINC01296 in ovarian cancer still remain unclear. The objective of our study was to determine the expression, biological roles, and clinical significance of LINC01296 in ovarian cancer.MethodsLINC01296 expression was measured in ovarian cancer tissues or cell lines. Next, the relationships between LINC01296 levels and the clinical factors of ovarian cancer, such as progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed. Additionally, cell proliferation, migration and invasion capacities, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution were investigated after silencing of LINC01296. To confirm whether LINC01296 mediates EMT initiation in ovarian cancer cells, the effect of LINC01296 silence on E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin was assessed in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells.ResultsWe found that LINC01296 was over-expressed in ovarian cancer tissues and cell lines, when comparing with adjacent normal tissue samples and normal cells. Higher LINC01296 expression was significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. For the functional experiments, knockdown of LINC01296 suppressed cell proliferation, inhibited colony formation ability, abrogated cell migration and invasion potential, and enhanced cell apoptosis. Cell cycle analysis suggested that LINC01296 positively regulated cell cycle progression in ovarian cancer cells. Moreover, western blotting analysis displayed that knockdown of LINC01296 significantly increased E-cadherin, but reduced N-cadherin and vimentin expressions in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells, compared with no-transfection cells.ConclusionsLINC01296 plays an important role in promoting the progression of ovarian cancer. Over-expression of LINC01296 might function as an indicator for diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer patients.     

Transmembrane protein 106A is silenced by promoter region hypermethylation and suppresses gastric cancer growth by inducing apoptosis

Inactivation of tumour suppressor genes by promoter methylation plays an important role in the initiation and progression of gastric cancer (GC). Transmembrane 106A gene (TMEM106A) encodes a novel protein of previously unknown function. This study analysed the biological functions, epigenetic changes and the clinical significance of TMEM106A in GC. Data from experiments indicate that TMEM106A is a type II membrane protein, which is localized to mitochondria and the plasma membrane. TMEM106A was down‐regulated or silenced by promoter region hypermethylation in GC cell lines, but expressed in normal gastric tissues. Overexpression of TMEM106A suppressed cell growth and induced apoptosis in GC cell lines, and retarded the growth of xenografts in nude mice. These effects were associated with the activation of caspase‐2, caspase‐9, and caspase‐3, cleavage of BID and inactivation of poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP). In primary GC samples, loss or reduction of TMEM106A expression was associated with promoter region hypermethylation. TMEM106A was methylated in 88.6% (93/105) of primary GC and 18.1% (2/11) in cancer adjacent normal tissue samples. Further analysis suggested that TMEM106A methylation in primary GCs was significantly correlated with smoking and tumour metastasis. In conclusion, TMEM106A is frequently methylated in human GC. The expression of TMEM106A is regulated by promoter hypermethylation. TMEM106A is a novel functional tumour suppressor in gastric carcinogenesis.     

LncRNA LINC00470 promotes the degradation of PTEN mRNA to facilitate malignant behavior in gastric cancer cells

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most frequent malignancy worldwide. Recently, long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) LINC00470 has been demonstrated to play an oncogenic role in human cancer. However, the clinical significance and functional role of LINC00470 in the progression of GC is largely unknown. In this study, our findings showed that LINC00470 was significantly upregulated in GC tissues and cell lines, and correlated with distant metastasis, TNM stage and poor prognosis. Overexpression and knockdown experiments revealed its oncogenic functions on GC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Mechanistically, LINC00470 associated with PTEN mRNA and suppressed its stability through interaction with the N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) writer METTL3. We also showed that LINC00470-METTL3-mediated PTEN mRNA degradation relied on the m⁶A reader protein YTHDF2-dependent pathway. Taken together, LINC00470 might serve as a therapeutic target for GC patients.     

Long non‐coding RNA linc00261 suppresses gastric cancer progression via promoting Slug degradation

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a threat to public health with high incidence and mortality worldwide. Increasing evidence demonstrates that long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play critical regulatory roles in cancer biology, including GC. Previous profiling study showed that lncRNA linc00261 was aberrantly expressed in GC. However, the role of linc00261 in GC progression and the precise molecular mechanism remain unknown. In this study, we report that linc00261 was significantly down‐regulated in GC tissues and the expression level of linc00261 negatively correlated with advanced tumour status and clinical stage as well as poor prognostic outcome. In vitro functional assays indicate that ectopic expression of linc00261 suppressed cell invasion by inhibiting the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). By RNA pull‐down and mass spectrum experiments, we identified Slug as an RNA‐binding protein that binds to linc00261. We confirmed that linc00261 down‐regulated Slug by decreasing the stability of Slug proteins and that the tumour‐suppressive function of linc00261 can be neutralized by Slug. linc00261 may promote the degradation of Slug via enhancing the interaction between GSK3β and Slug. Moreover, linc00216 overexpression repressed lung metastasis in vivo. Together, our findings suggest that linc00261 acts a tumour suppressor in GC by decreasing the stability of Slug proteins and suppressing EMT. By clarifying the mechanisms underlying GC progression, these findings may facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for GC.     

Presence of cancer cells in gastric lavage of gastric cancer patients as an indicator of advanced disease,predictor of tumour aggressive phenotype and independent prognostic factor for poor survival: The endoluminal metastatic pathway of gastric cancer and GL0/GL1 classification

Objective

As of 2017, the pathobiology of gastric cancer (GC) is far from fully understood; consequently, new methods of basic and advanced research have been proposed and tested. The presence (GL1) vs absence (GL0) of malignant cells exfoliated in gastric lavage (GL) of GC patients was formerly evaluated with diagnostic intent but not for staging or prognostic assessment. We investigated this hitherto unreported application of cytopathology.

Methods

GL was preoperatively and prospectively collected from 80 GC patients and cytologically analysed. The results were compared with the classic clinicopathological features of GC and related to survival. The prognostic value of GL1 was assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

GL1 was detected in 36 samples (45%) and correlated with advanced tumour depth (T3‐T4), lymphatic metastasis (N+), distant metastasis (M1) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI1; P=.0317, .0024, .003 and .0028, respectively). Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter for GL1 (23 months) vs GL0 patients (42 months; P=.005) and GL1 vs GL0 T1 subjects (12.6 vs 47.8 months, P=.0029). Univariate analysis revealed that GL1, N+, M1, LVI1 and advanced stage were significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis assessed GL1 as the only independent prognostic factor for worse OS and progression‐free survival (P=.0013 and .0107).

Conclusions

In the present study, GL1 was correlated with advanced disease, aggressive tumour behaviour and poor prognosis. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, the GL0/GL1 classification can be applied to GC patients to achieve higher accuracy in staging, prognostic stratification and treatment selection.