Are plant formins integral membrane proteins?

Background  

The formin family of proteins has been implicated in signaling pathways of cellular morphogenesis in both animals and fungi; in the latter case, at least, they participate in communication between the actin cytoskeleton and the cell surface. Nevertheless, they appear to be cytoplasmic or nuclear proteins, and it is not clear whether they communicate with the plasma membrane, and if so, how. Because nothing is known about formin function in plants, I performed a systematic search for putative Arabidopsis thaliana formin homologs.     

Are proteins well-packed?

The average packing density inside proteins is as high as in crystalline solids. Does this mean proteins are well-packed? We go beyond average densities, and look at the full distribution functions of free volumes inside proteins. Using a new and rigorous Delaunay triangulation method for parsing space into empty and filled regions, we introduce formal definitions of interior and surface packing densities. Although proteins look like organic crystals by the criterion of average density, they look more like liquids and glasses by the criterion of their free volume distributions. The distributions are broad, and the scalings of volume-to-surface, volume-to-cluster-radius, and numbers of void versus volume show that the interiors of proteins are more like randomly packed spheres near their percolation threshold than like jigsaw puzzles. We find that larger proteins are packed more loosely than smaller proteins. And we find that the enthalpies of folding (per amino acid) are independent of the packing density of a protein, indicating that van der Waals interactions are not a dominant component of the folding forces.     

How many membrane proteins are there?

One of the basic issues that arises in functional genomics is the ability to predict the subcellular location of proteins that are deduced from gene and genome sequencing. In particular, one would like to be able to readily specify those proteins that are soluble and those that are inserted in a membrane. Traditional methods of distinguishing between these two locations have relied on extensive, time-consuming biochemical studies. The alternative approach has been to make inferences based on a visual search of the amino acid sequences of presumed gene products for stretches of hydrophobic amino acids. This numerical, sequence-based approach is usually seen as a first approximation pending more reliable biochemical data. The recent availability of large and complete sequence data sets for several organisms allows us to determine just how accurate such a numerical approach could be, and to attempt to minimize and quantify the error involved. We have optimized a statistical approach to protein location determination. Using our approach, we have determined that surprisingly few proteins are misallocated using the numerical method. We also examine the biological implications of the success of this technique.     

Are proteins made of modules?

Analysis of a set of well characterized enzymes shows that the size of a protein subunit is directly related to the number of unique ligand binding functions described for the particular enzyme. The average size increment is about 5 000 Da per ligand binding function. This value corresponds very well to: (a) the amount of polypeptide chain required to form a stable folded structure, and (b) the size of polypeptide coded by the average exon. This reinforces the hypothesis that exon-coded modules are basic architectural units for proteins. Key predictive elements of this hypothesis are: 1) generally each module has a unique function, such as the ability to bind a specific ligand; 2) the size of an enzyme subunit should be determined by the number of modules required to accomplish the enzyme's biological role.     

Are coiled-coil proteins evolutionarily related?

A modification to the standard Needleman-Wunsch sequence comparison scheme is presented. In cases where high levels of sequence similarity may arise from a common structural motif, this method discriminates between common ancestry and similarity due to structural constraints alone. Use of this algorithm is illustrated with the coiled-coil motif in the cases of idealized coiled-coil sequences, intermediate filaments and reovirus hemagluttinin.     

How do membrane proteins sense water stress?

Maintenance of cell turgor is a prerequisite for almost any form of life as it provides a mechanical force for the expansion of the cell envelope. As changes in extracellular osmolality will have similar physicochemical effects on cells from all biological kingdoms, the responses to osmotic stress may be alike in all organisms. The primary response of bacteria to osmotic upshifts involves the activation of transporters, to effect the rapid accumulation of osmoprotectants, and sensor kinases, to increase the transport and/or biosynthetic capacity for these solutes. Upon osmotic downshift, the excess of cytoplasmic solutes is released via mechanosensitive channel proteins. A number of breakthroughs in the last one or two years have led to tremendous advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of osmosensing in bacteria. The possible mechanisms of osmosensing, and the actual evidence for a particular mechanism, are presented for well studied, osmoregulated transport systems, sensor kinases and mechanosensitive channel proteins. The emerging picture is that intracellular ionic solutes (or ionic strength) serve as a signal for the activation of the upshift-activated transporters and sensor kinases. For at least one system, there is strong evidence that the signal is transduced to the protein complex via alterations in the protein-lipid interactions rather than direct sensing of ion concentration or ionic strength by the proteins. The osmotic downshift-activated mechanosensitive channels, on the other hand, sense tension in the membrane but other factors such as hydration state of the protein may affect the equilibrium between open and closed states of the proteins.     

Are DEAD-box proteins becoming respectable helicases?

The vaccinia NPH-II RNA helicase, a member of the DEAD/DExH-box protein family, has been shown to be a processive, unidirectional RNA helicase with a step size of about one half turn of a helix. This finding demonstrates that RNA helicases can function as molecular motors.     

How do Rab proteins function in membrane traffic?

The Rabs are a group of GTP-binding proteins implicated for some time in the targeting of different transport vesicles within the cell, but it has been unclear how they function, or how they relate to a second group of targeting proteins, the SNAREs. Recent work, discussed in this review, has used biophysical, biochemical and genetic approaches to begin to answer these questions for Rab3, Rab5 and the yeast protein Sec4p. However, the results from these three Rabs lead to a surprising conclusion: the different Rabs seem to function via highly diverse target proteins.     

Is the vertical disposition of Mycoplasma membrane proteins affected by membrane fluidity?

The influence of the physical state of the membrane lipid matrix on the vertical disposition of membrane proteins was studied with Acholeplasma laidlawii. Changes in membrane fluidity were brought about by altering the fatty acid composition of membrane lipids, by changing the growth temperature, by aging of cultures and by inducing changes in the membrane lipid-to-protein ratio through treatment with chloramphenicol. The lactoperoxidase-mediated iodination technique was used to label membrane proteins exposed to the aqueous surroundings. The degree of exposure of the iodine-binding sites of membrane proteins on the external surface of intact cells was found to undergo significant changes on varying growth conditions, but the changes could not be consistently correlated with changes in membrane fluidity, nor were they discernible on iodination of isolated membranes.     

How important are transmembrane helices of bitopic membrane proteins?

The topology of a bitopic membrane protein consists of a single transmembrane helix connecting two extra-membranous domains. As opposed to helices from polytopic proteins, the transmembrane helices of bitopic proteins were initially considered as merely hydrophobic anchors, while more recent studies have begun to shed light on their role in the protein's function. Herein the overall importance of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins was analyzed using a relative conservation analysis. Interestingly, the transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins are on average, significantly more conserved than the remainder of the protein, even when taking into account their smaller amino acid repertoire. Analysis of highly conserved transmembrane domains did not reveal any unifying consensus, pointing to a great diversity in their conservation patterns. However, Fourier power spectrum analysis was able to show that regardless of the conservation motif, in most sequences a significant conservation moment was observed, in that one side of the helix was conserved while the other was not. Taken together, it may be possible to conclude that a significant proportion of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins participate in specific interactions, in a variety of modes in the plane of the lipid bilayer.     

How important are transmembrane helices of bitopic membrane proteins?

The topology of a bitopic membrane protein consists of a single transmembrane helix connecting two extra-membranous domains. As opposed to helices from polytopic proteins, the transmembrane helices of bitopic proteins were initially considered as merely hydrophobic anchors, while more recent studies have begun to shed light on their role in the protein's function. Herein the overall importance of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins was analyzed using a relative conservation analysis. Interestingly, the transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins are on average, significantly more conserved than the remainder of the protein, even when taking into account their smaller amino acid repertoire. Analysis of highly conserved transmembrane domains did not reveal any unifying consensus, pointing to a great diversity in their conservation patterns. However, Fourier power spectrum analysis was able to show that regardless of the conservation motif, in most sequences a significant conservation moment was observed, in that one side of the helix was conserved while the other was not. Taken together, it may be possible to conclude that a significant proportion of transmembrane helices from bitopic membrane proteins participate in specific interactions, in a variety of modes in the plane of the lipid bilayer.     

Are membrane enzymes regulated by the viscosity of the membrane environment?

We have examined the idea that membrane enzymes are regulated by the viscosity of surrounding lipids using data compiled from the literature for the effect of the change in membrane viscosity ([symbol: see text]) at the gel- to liquid-crystal-phase transition on the activities of several enzymes. The analysis was not extended explicitly to the problem of viscosity-dependent regulation of membrane enzymes in liquid-crystalline lipids because of the absence of exact data for values of [symbol: see text] in liquid-crystalline phases of variable composition. For most membrane enzymes studied, energies of activation are discontinuous, while kcat is continuous, at the main-phase transition. We consider that the energy of activation contains terms related to the height of the chemical barrier to reaction and terms due to the mechanical properties of the bilayer, such as the work of expansion during the catalytic cycle and the temperature dependence of [symbol: see text]. We find that the differences in energies of activation, above and below the break points in Arrhenius plots, are orders of magnitude larger than can be accounted for by the above mechanical factors. Thus, discontinuities in energies of activation at the phase transition appear to reflect changes in the chemical barrier to reaction, which is independent of [symbol: see text]. The theorectical analysis indicates too that values of [symbol: see text] for bilayers in the liquid-crystalline phase would have to be several orders of magnitude larger than those for gel phases in order to provide a basis for viscosity-dependent regulation of membrane enzymes in liquid-crystalline phases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Are axoplasmic microtubules necessary for membrane excitation?

Summary The excitability of the squid giant axon was studied as a function of transmembrane hydrostatic pressure differences, the latter being altered by the technique of intracellular perfusion. When a KF solution was used as the internal medium, a pressure difference of about 15 cm water had very little effect on either the membrane potential or excitability. However, within a few minutes after introducing either a KCl-containing, a KBr-containing, or a colchicine-containing solution as the internal medium, with the same pressure difference across the membrane, the axon excitability was suppressed. In these cases, removal of the pressure difference restored the excitability, indicating that the structure of membrane was not irreversibly damaged. Electron-microscopic observations of these axons revealed that the perfusion with a KF solution or colchicine-containing solution preserves the submembranous cytoskeletal layer, whereas perfusion with a KCl or KBr solution dissolves it. These results suggest that the submembranous cytoskeletons including microtubules provide an important mechanical support to the excitable membrane but are not essential elements in channel activities.     

A novel fractionation method of the rough ER integral membrane proteins; Resident proteins versus exported proteins?

We treated the high salt‐washed canine pancreatic rough ER (KRM) with 0.18% Triton X‐100, separated the extract from the residual membrane (0.18%Tx KRM), and processed the extract with SM‐2 beads to recover membrane proteins in proteoliposomes. To focus on integral membrane proteins, KRM, 0.18%Tx KRM and proteoliposomes were subjected to sodium carbonate treatment, and analyzed by 2‐D gel electrophoresis. Consequently we found that a distinct group of integral membrane protein of KRM preferentially extracted from the membrane and recovered in proteoliposomes did exist, while majority of KRM integral membrane proteins were fractionated in 0.18%Tx KRM, which retained the basic structure and functions of KRM. Protein identification showed that the former group was enriched with proteins exported from the ER and the latter group comprised mostly of ER resident proteins. This result will potentially affect the prevailing view of the ER membrane structure as well as protein sorting from the ER.     

What is the role of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion?

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins have been at the fore-front of research on biological membrane fusion for some time. The subcellular localization of SNAREs and their ability to form the so-called SNARE complex may be integral to determining the specificity of intracellular fusion (the SNARE hypothesis) and/or serving as the minimal fusion machinery. Both the SNARE hypothesis and the idea of the minimal fusion machinery have been challenged by a number of experimental observations in various model systems, suggesting that SNAREs may have other functions. Considering recent advances in the SNARE literature, it appears that SNAREs may actually function as part of a complex fusion "machine." Their role in the machinery could be any one or a combination of roles, including establishing tight membrane contact, formation of a scaffolding on which to build the machine, binding of lipid surfaces, and many others. It is also possible that complexations other than the classic SNARE complex participate in membrane fusion.