Roles for Zebrafish Focal Adhesion Kinase in Notochord and Somite Morphogenesis

We have cloned zebrafish focal adhesion kinase (Fak) and analyzed its subcellular localization. Fak protein is localized at the cortex of notochord cells and at the notochord-somite boundary. During somitogenesis, Fak protein becomes concentrated at the basal region of epithelial cells at intersomitic boundaries. Phosphorylated Fak protein is seen at both the notochord-somite boundary and intersomitic boundaries, consistent with a role for Fak in boundary formation and maintenance. The localization of Fak protein to the basal region of epithelial cells in knypek;trilobite double mutant embryos shows that polarization of Fak distribution in the somite border cells is independent of internal mesenchymal cells. In addition, we show that neither Notch signaling through Suppressor of Hairless (SuH) nor deltaD is necessary for the wild-type segmental pattern of fak mRNA expression in the anterior paraxial mesoderm. However, nonsegmental expression of fak mRNA occurs with ectopic activation of Notch signaling through SuH and also in fused somite and beamter mutant embryos, indicating that there are multiple regulators of fak mRNA expression. Our results suggest that Fak plays a central role in notochord and somite morphogenesis.     

New insights into skeletal muscle development and growth in teleost fishes

Recent research has significantly broadened our understanding of how the teleost somite is patterned to achieve embryonic and postembryonic myogenesis. Medial (adaxial) cells and posterior cells of the early epithelial somite generate embryonic superficial slow and deep fast muscle fibers, respectively, whereas anterior somitic cells move laterally to form an external cell layer of undifferentiated Pax7-positive myogenic precursors surrounding the embryonic myotome. In late embryo and in larvae, some of the cells contained in the external cell layer incorporate into the myotome and differentiate into new muscle fibers, thus contributing to medio-lateral expansion of the myotome. This supports the suggestion that the teleost external cell layer is homologous to the amniote dermomyotome. Some of the signalling molecules that promote lateral movement or regulate the myogenic differentiation of external cell precursors have been identified and include stromal cell-derived factor 1 (Sdf1), hedgehog proteins, and fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8). Recent studies have shed light on gene activations that underlie the differentiation and maturation of slow and fast muscle fibers, pointing out that both adaxially derived embryonic slow fibers and slow fibers formed during the myotome expansion of larvae initially and transiently bear features of the fast fiber phenotype.     

Zebrafish ftz-f1a (nuclear receptor 5a2) functions in skeletal muscle organization

Fushi-tarazu factor 1a (Ftz-F1a, Ff1a, Nr5a2) is a nuclear receptor with diverse functions in many tissues. Here, we report the function of ff1a in zebrafish muscle differentiation. In situ hybridization revealed that ff1a mRNA was present in the adaxial and migrating slow muscle precursors and was down-regulated when slow muscle cells matured. This expression was under the control of hedgehog genes, expanded when hedgehog was increased and missing in mutants defective in genes in the Hedgehog pathway like you-too (yot), sonic you (syu), and u-boot (ubo). Blocking ff1a activity by injecting a deleted form of ff1a or an antisense ff1a morpholino oligo into fish embryos caused thinner and disorganized fibers of both slow and fast properties. Transient expression of ff1a in syu, ubo, and yot embryos led to more fibril bundles, even when slow myoblasts were transfated into fast properties. We showed that ff1a and prox1 complemented each other in slow myofibril assembly, but they did not affect the expression of each other. These results demonstrate that ff1a functions in both slow and fast muscle morphogenesis in response to Hedgehog signaling, and this function parallels the activity of another slow muscle gene, prox1.     

Zebrafish slow muscle cell migration induces a wave of fast muscle morphogenesis

The specification and morphogenesis of slow and fast twitch muscle fibers are crucial for muscle development. In zebrafish, Hedgehog is required for slow muscle fiber specification. However, less is known about signals that promote development of fast muscle fibers, which constitute the majority of somitic cells. We show that when Hedgehog signaling is blocked, fast muscle cell elongation is disrupted. Using genetic mosaics, we show that Hedgehog signal perception is required by slow muscle cells but not by fast muscle cells for fast muscle cell elongation. Furthermore, we show that slow muscle cells are sufficient to pattern the medial to lateral wave of fast muscle fiber morphogenesis even when fast muscle cells cannot perceive the Hedgehog signal. Thus, the medial to lateral migration of slow muscle fibers through the somite creates a morphogenetic signal that patterns fast muscle fiber elongation in its wake.     

Two linked hairy/Enhancer of split-related zebrafish genes,her1 and her7, function together to refine alternating somite boundaries

The formation of somites, reiterated structures that will give rise to vertebrae and muscles, is thought to be dependent upon a molecular oscillator that may involve the Notch pathway. hairy/Enhancer of split related [E(spl)]-related (her or hes) genes, potential targets of Notch signaling, have been implicated as an output of the molecular oscillator. We have isolated a zebrafish deficiency, b567, that deletes two linked her genes, her1 and her7. Homozygous b567 mutants have defective somites along the entire embryonic axis. Injection of a combination of her1 and her7 (her1+7) morpholino modified antisense oligonucleotides (MOs) phenocopies the b567 mutant somitic phenotype, indicating that her1 and her7 are necessary for normal somite formation and that defective somitogenesis in b567 mutant embryos is due to deletion of her1 and her7. Analysis at the cellular level indicates that somites in her1+7-deficient embryos are enlarged in the anterior-posterior dimension. Weak somite boundaries are often found within these enlarged somites which are delineated by stronger, but imperfect, boundaries. In addition, the anterior-posterior polarity of these enlarged somites is disorganized. Analysis of her1 MO-injected embryos and her7 MO-injected embryos indicates that although these genes have partially redundant functions in most of the trunk region, her1 is necessary for proper formation of the anteriormost somites and her7 is necessary for proper formation of somites posterior to somite 11. By following somite development over time, we demonstrate that her genes are necessary for the formation of alternating strong somite boundaries. Thus, even though two potential downstream components of Notch signaling are lacking in her1+7-deficient embryos, somite boundaries form, but do so with a one and a half to two segment periodicity.     

Anteroposterior patterning is required within segments for somite boundary formation in developing zebrafish

Somite formation involves the establishment of a segmental prepattern in the presomitic mesoderm, anteroposterior patterning of each segmental primordium and formation of boundaries between adjacent segments. How these events are co-ordinated remains uncertain. In this study, analysis of expression of zebrafish mesp-a reveals that each segment acquires anteroposterior regionalisation when located in the anterior presomitic mesoderm. Thus anteroposterior patterning is occurring after the establishment of a segmental prepattern in the paraxial mesoderm and prior to somite boundary formation. Zebrafish fss(-), bea(-), des(-) and aei(-) embryos all fail to form somites, yet we demonstrate that a segmental prepattern is established in the presomitic mesoderm of all these mutants and hox gene expression shows that overall anteroposterior patterning of the mesoderm is also normal. However, analysis of various molecular markers reveals that anteroposterior regionalisation within each segment is disturbed in the mutants. In fss(-), there is a loss of anterior segment markers, such that all segments appear posteriorized, whereas in bea(-), des(-) and aei(-), anterior and posterior markers are expressed throughout each segment. Since somite formation is disrupted in these mutants, correct anteroposterior patterning within segments may be a prerequisite for somite boundary formation. In support of this hypothesis, we show that it is possible to rescue boundary formation in fss(-) through the ectopic expression of EphA4, an anterior segment marker, in the paraxial mesoderm. These observations indicate that a key consequence of the anteroposterior regionalisation of segments may be the induction of Eph and ephrin expression at segment interfaces and that Eph/ephrin signalling subsequently contributes to the formation of somite boundaries.     

Control of morphogenetic cell movements in the early zebrafish myotome

As the vertebrate myotome is generated, myogenic precursor cells undergo extensive and coordinated movements as they differentiate into properly positioned embryonic muscle fibers. In the zebrafish, the "adaxial" cells adjacent to the notochord are the first muscle precursors to be specified. After initially differentiating into slow-twitch myosin-expressing muscle fibers, these cells have been shown to undergo a remarkable radial migration through the lateral somite, to populate the superficial layer of slow-twitch muscle of the mature myotome. Here we characterize an earlier set of adaxial cell behaviors; the transition from a roughly 4x5 array of cuboidal cells to a 1x20 stack of elongated cells, prior to the migration event. We find that adaxial cells display a highly stereotypical series of behaviors as they undergo this rearrangement. Furthermore, we show that the actin regulatory molecule, Cap1, is specifically expressed in adaxial cells and is required for the progression of these behaviors. The requirement of Cap1 for a cellular apical constriction step is reminiscent of similar requirements of Cap during apical constriction in Drosophila development, suggesting a conservation of gene function for a cell biological event critical to many developmental processes.     

Restricted expression of the zebrafish hsp90alpha gene in slow and fast muscle fiber lineages

Members of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) family of molecular chaperones play important roles in allowing a select group of intracellular signaling molecules reach and maintain functionally active conformations. We have previously shown that hsp90alpha gene expression in early zebrafish embryos is restricted to a subgroup of paraxial-mesoderm derived somitic cells prior to muscle formation and that the gene is downregulated in mature trunk and tail muscle fibers. Here we have compared the expression of the hsp90alpha gene to muscle regulatory genes during development of slow and fast muscle fibers in normal embryos and in embryos carrying mutations which affect somitic muscle formation. We show that hsp90alpha is first expressed early during the development of slow somitic muscle progenitors shortly following myoD activation and at a point prior to or co-incident with the expression of other known muscle regulatory genes. Expression of hsp90alpha is also activated in the midline of flh mutants when these cells switch from a notochord to a muscle fate. Conversely, expression is not detectable in cells of the paraxial mesoderm lineage which fail to converge in spt mutants and which do not activate expression of other muscle specific marker genes. Finally, expression of hsp90alpha is downregulated in slow muscle fibers by 24 h of age but becomes detectable in the later developing fast fibers at this time. Thus, hsp90alpha is expressed in developing muscle progenitors during short temporal and spatial windows of both slow and fast fiber lineages in the zebrafish somite.     

Off limits--integrins holding boundaries in somitogenesis

Borders are essential for demarcating repeated structures such as somites during vertebrate development. Two recent articles describe roles for Integrinalpha5 and its ligand Fibronectin1 in zebrafish anterior intersomitic boundary formation and link them to Notch and Eph-Ephrin pathways in epithelialization of somite boundary cells. Together with these pathways, Integrinalpha5 and Fibronectin1 orchestrate the orderly formation of somite and later myotome borders. These studies shed light on components downstream of the periodic segmentation mechanism - the 'segmentation clock' - in somitogenesis.     

鳜慢肌胚后发育与生长特征

鱼类快肌和慢肌分别占据骨骼肌的不同位置,表现不同的生长发育特征。为了解鳜(Sinipercachuatsi)慢肌纤维的胚后发育特征,本研究通过制作孵化后1～33日龄鳜个体的石蜡切片,采用慢肌特异抗体的免疫组织化学染色,观察了背鳍起点处躯干横切面慢肌的发育变化特征,并利用图像分析软件统计慢肌纤维的数目和面积。结果表明,孵化后鳜仔鱼慢肌位于水平肌隔附近,呈楔形,向背、腹两侧生长。孵化后1～9日龄为单层肌纤维,11日龄发育为多层肌纤维,19日龄覆盖侧线附近,33日龄延伸至背侧第2背肌节、腹侧腹部肌肉2/3处,并在水平肌隔和侧线处分别形成两个肌群。位于骨骼肌最外层的扁平状表层细胞,可能为慢肌增生生长的主要来源。躯干单侧慢肌肌纤维数目由孵化后6个增加至315个,总面积从13.18μm2增加到7 839.58μm2,孵化后13日龄的增生生长占优势,其他发育阶段,肥大生长一直占主导优势。     

The epaxial-hypaxial subdivision of the avian somite

In all jaw-bearing vertebrates, three-dimensional mobility relies on segregated, separately innervated epaxial and hypaxial skeletal muscles. In amniotes, these muscles form from the morphologically continuous dermomyotome and myotome, whose epaxial-hypaxial subdivision and hence the formation of distinct epaxial-hypaxial muscles is not understood. Here we show that En1 expression labels a central subdomain of the avian dermomyotome, medially abutting the expression domain of the lead-lateral or hypaxial marker Sim1. En1 expression is maintained when cells from the En1-positive dermomyotome enter the myotome and dermatome, thereby superimposing the En1-Sim1 expression boundary onto the developing musculature and dermis. En1 cells originate from the dorsomedial edge of the somite. Their development is under positive control by notochord and floor plate (Shh), dorsal neural tube (Wnt1) and surface ectoderm (Wnt1-like signalling activity) but negatively regulated by the lateral plate mesoderm (BMP4). This dependence on epaxial signals and suppression by hypaxial signals places En1 into the epaxial somitic programme. Consequently, the En1-Sim1 expression boundary marks the epaxial-hypaxial dermomyotomal or myotomal boundary. In cell aggregation assays, En1- and Sim1-expressing cells sort out, suggesting that the En1-Sim1 expression boundary may represent a true compartment boundary, foreshadowing the epaxial-hypaxial segregation of muscle.     

Cell cycle progression is required for zebrafish somite morphogenesis but not segmentation clock function

Cell division, differentiation and morphogenesis are coordinated during embryonic development, and frequently are in disarray in pathologies such as cancer. Here, we present a zebrafish mutant that ceases mitosis at the beginning of gastrulation, but that undergoes axis elongation and develops blood, muscle and a beating heart. We identify the mutation as being in early mitotic inhibitor 1 (emi1), a negative regulator of the Anaphase Promoting Complex, and use the mutant to examine the role of the cell cycle in somitogenesis. The mutant phenotype indicates that axis elongation during the segmentation period is driven substantially by cell migration. We find that the segmentation clock, which regulates somitogenesis, functions normally in the absence of cell cycle progression, and observe that mitosis is a modest source of noise for the clock. Somite morphogenesis involves the epithelialization of the somite border cells around a core of mesenchyme. As in wild-type embryos, somite boundary cells are polarized along a Fibronectin matrix in emi1(-/-). The mutants also display evidence of segment polarity. However, in the absence of a normal cell cycle, somites appear to hyper-epithelialize, as the internal mesenchymal cells exit the core of the somite after initial boundary formation. Thus, cell cycle progression is not required during the segmentation period for segmentation clock function but is necessary for the normal segmental arrangement of epithelial borders and internal mesenchymal cells.