Effect of stress management on blood pressure in mild primary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE--To establish whether stress management had a larger effect than a control treatment on resting blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. DESIGN--A 12 week baseline period of habituation to measurement of blood pressure was followed by randomisation to either stress management or mild exercise for six months and follow up six months later. SETTING--General practice, district general hospital, and medical school. PATIENTS--Of the 184 patients aged under 60 with mild primary hypertension who entered the baseline habituation period, 88 were excluded because they failed to meet the entry criteria or they withdrew from the study. The remaining 46 men and 50 women underwent treatment. INTERVENTIONS--10 clinical sessions and daily practice at home of either stress management based on relaxation or non-aerobic stretching exercises. Mildly stressful 15 minute interviews before and after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Diastolic and systolic blood pressure in the clinic and during 12 hours of ambulatory recording, and left ventricular mass measured by echocardiography. RESULTS--The patients'' blood pressure fell during habituation (systolic pressure from 152 mmHg to 140 mmHg, diastolic pressure from 98 to 93 mm Hg), but neither resting nor ambulatory blood pressure was changed by the treatments. Left ventricular mass was also unchanged. Blood pressure rose during the stressful interview, but this rise was reduced by stress management (systolic pressure rose by 7.4 mmHg before treatment and by 3.7 mmHg after treatment). CONCLUSION--Stress management of a type advocated for treating mild primary hypertension is ineffective in lowering blood pressure in patients who are well habituated to measuring blood pressure.     

Caffeine restriction: effect on mild hypertension.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the effects on blood pressure of modifying dietary caffeine intake in patients with mild and borderline hypertension by monitoring ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. DESIGN--Four way, randomised, crossover trial of four consecutive two week dietary regimens: normal diet, caffeine free diet alone, caffeine free diet with decaffeinated instant coffee, caffeine free diet with caffeinated instant coffee (instant coffee phases conducted double blind). SETTING--Hospital hypertension clinic, Scotland. PATIENTS--52 patients (23 men; aged 26-67 years) with untreated borderline or mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90-105 mm Hg) who normally drank a minimum of three cups of coffee daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Mean ambulatory blood pressure over 24 hours; mean morning, daytime, and night time ambulatory blood pressure; sitting clinic blood pressure at 1700; plasma caffeine concentration at 1700 on the last day of each regimen. RESULTS--Mean 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure was not different between regimens. There was no difference in blood pressure variability between regimens. During the caffeine free diet alone morning ambulatory diastolic blood pressure was higher (2.8 mm Hg) than during the caffeine free diet with caffeinated coffee. Mean sitting clinic systolic blood pressure was higher at 1700 (4.7 mm Hg) with a caffeine free diet than with the caffeine free diet with caffeinated coffee (p less than 0.05). Dietary compliance as assessed by plasma caffeine concentration was excellent. There was no significant correlation between plasma caffeine concentration and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS--Drinking caffeinated instant coffee over a two week period does not adversely influence blood pressure in patients with borderline or mild hypertension; abstinence is of no benefit.     

检测窦性心率震荡对诊断2型糖尿病患者隐性高血压效果的临床研究

目的:研究窦性心率震荡诊断2型糖尿病合并隐性高血压患者的临床效果。方法:对2009年12月至2013年4月我院心内科收治的2型糖尿病合并高血压患者123例进行回顾性分析,根据诊室内手测血压及24 h动态血压监测结果将患者分为高血压组(EH组)及隐性高血压组(MH)组,另取在我院体检的诊室及24小时动态血压均正常者为NT组,三组研究对象均进行诊室内手测血压,24 h动态血压监测及HRT检测,比较三组检测结果。结果:(1)诊室内手测血压结果显示MH组收缩压及舒张压与NT组差异无统计学意义(P0.05);EH组收缩压及舒张压与NT组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)24 h动态血压监测结果显示MH组及EH组收缩压与舒张压与NT组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。(3)HRT检测结果显示MH组及EH组TO值与TS值与NT组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:HRT检测结果可作为诊断2型糖尿病患者隐性高血压的一项可靠指标。     

Comparison of the Effects on Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Awakening versus Bedtime Administration of Torasemide in Essential Hypertension

Torasemide is a high‐ceiling loop diuretic frequently used in the treatment of congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. Low doses of torasemide (2.5 to 5 mg/day) do not elevate 24 h natriuresis, and they constitute effective monotherapy for mild‐to‐moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension according to results based on clinic blood pressure (BP). However, there has yet to be a proper evaluation of its 24 h efficacy or potential dependency of effects according to the circadian time of treatment. Accordingly, this trial investigated the administration time‐dependent efficacy of torasemide in uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients. We studied a total of 113 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 51.7±10.6 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive torasemide (5 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after six weeks of treatment. The efficacy of torasemide was significantly greater with bedtime dosing (i.e., 14.8 and 9.5 mmHg reduction in the 24 h mean systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) as compared with morning dosing upon awakening (i.e., 6.4 and 3.4 mmHg reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP; p<0.001 between the two treatment‐time groups). The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory BP after treatment was also higher after bedtime treatment (64 vs. 23%; p<0.001). Safety and tolerability were comparable between the two treatment‐time groups. A dose of 5 mg/day torasemide is more effective for BP reduction for uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients when ingested at bedtime than in the morning upon arising. The difference in antihypertensive efficacy as a function of the circadian dosing‐time of torasemide here documented should be taken into account when prescribing this loop diuretic to treat essential hypertensive patients.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol,metoprolol, pindolol,and slow-release propranolol

Intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure was measured over 24 hours, in 34 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, both before and after double-blind randomisation to treatment with atenolol (n=9), metoprolol (n=9), pindolol (n=9), or propranolol in its slow-release form (n=7). The dosage of each drug was adjusted at monthly clinic visits until satisfactory control of blood pressure was achieved (140/90 mm Hg or less by cuff) or the maximum dose in the study protocol was reached. A second intra-arterial recording was made after these drugs had been taken once daily at 0800 for three to eight months (mean 5·0±SD 1·4) and was started four hours after the last dose.At the end of the 24-hour recordings blood pressure was significantly lower with all four drugs. The extent to which the drugs reduced blood pressure, however, differed over the 24 hours. Atenolol lowered mean arterial pressure significantly throughout all 24 recorded hours, metoprolol for 12 hours, pindolol for 15 hours, and slow-release propranolol for 22 hours. Neither metoprolol nor pindolol lowered blood pressure during sleep. A significant reduction in heart rate was observed over 20 hours with atenolol, 20 hours with metoprolol, 10 hours with pindolol, and 24 hours with slow-release propranolol. Atenolol, metoprolol, and slow-release propranolol continued to slow the heart rate 24 hours after the last tablet was taken; this effect on heart rate, however, was not sustained throughout the second morning in those patients taking atenolol. Pindolol, the only drug studied that has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, increased heart rate and did not lower blood pressure during sleep.Atenolol and slow-release propranolol are effective as antihypertensive agents over 24 hours when taken once daily, whereas metoprolol and pindolol may need to be taken more frequently. At times of low sympathetic tone, however, such as during sleep, beta-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity may raise heart rate and attenuate the fall in blood pressure with treatment.     

Assessment of the accuracy and role of self-recorded blood pressures in the management of hypertension.

Self-recording of the blood pressure by patients away from hospital or office ("home blood pressure") has been advocated as providing a better estimate of "true" blood pressure. The reliability of home blood-pressure recording has been assessed only by standard indirect methods which themselves are subject to considerable error and variability. The accuracy of self-recorded blood pressures was therefore assessed in 57 patients with essential hypertension by comparison with simultaneous measurements of clinic blood pressures and with intra-arterial blood pressures recorded at home and at hospital. Home systolic blood pressures showed good agreement with clinic and intra-arterial pressures, but home diastolic blood pressures overestimated intra-arterial pressures, as did clinic diastolic pressures. The clinic and home diastolic pressures showed good agreement. There was considerable variability in individual differences comparing the indirect and intra-arterial methods, though the two indirect methods showed much closer agreement. This study suggests that home blood pressures are as accurate as clinic readings but may be recorded more frequently and thus provide more useful information. Neither is likely to approximate the intra-arterial blood pressure.     

Relaxation therapy and continuous ambulatory blood pressure in mild hypertension: a controlled study.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the long term effects of relaxation therapy on 24 hour ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure in patients with mild untreated and uncomplicated hypertension. DESIGN--Four week screening period followed by randomisation to receive either relaxation therapy or non-specific counselling for one year. Ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure was measured before and after treatment. SETTING--Outpatient clinic in Amsterdam''s university hospital. SUBJECTS--35 Subjects aged 20-60 who were being treated by general practitioners for hypertension but were referred to take part in the study. At three consecutive screening visits all subjects had a diastolic blood pressure without treatment of 95-110 mm Hg. Subjects were excluded if they had damaged target organs, secondary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a cholesterol concentration greater than 8 mmol/l, or a history of malignant hypertension. INTERVENTIONS--The group allocated to relaxation therapy was trained for eight weeks (one hour a week) in muscle relaxation, yoga exercises, and stress management and continued exercising twice daily for one year with monthly visits to the clinic. The control group had the same attendance schedule but had no training and were requested just to sit and relax twice a day. All subjects were asked not to change their diet or physical activity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Changes in ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure after one year of relaxation therapy or non-specific counselling. RESULTS--Mean urinary sodium excretion, serum concentration of cholesterol, and body weight did not change in either group. Diastolic pressures measured by sphygmomanometry were 2 and 3 mm Hg lower in subjects in the relaxation group and control group respectively at the one year follow up compared with initial readings. The mean diastolic ambulatory intra-arterial pressure during the daytime had not changed after one year in either group, but small treatment effects could not be excluded: the mean change for the relaxation group was -1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -6 to 3.9 mm Hg) and for the control group -0.4 mm Hg (-5.3 to 4.6 mm Hg). Mean ambulatory pressure in the evening also had not changed over the year, and in both groups nighttime pressure was 5 mm Hg higher. The variability in blood pressure was the same at both measurements. CONCLUSIONS--Relaxation therapy was an ineffective method of lowering 24 hour blood pressure, being no more beneficial than non-specific advice, support, and reassurance--themselves ineffective as a treatment for hypertension.     

Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials

Objective To determine the effect of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure levels and proportion of people with essential hypertension achieving targets.Design Meta-analysis of 18 randomised controlled trials.Participants 1359 people with essential hypertension allocated to home blood pressure monitoring and 1355 allocated to the “control” group seen in the healthcare system for 2-36 months.Main outcome measures Differences in systolic (13 studies), diastolic (16 studies), or mean (3 studies) blood pressures, and proportion of patients achieving targets (6 studies), between intervention and control groups.Results Systolic blood pressure was lower in people with hypertension who had home blood pressure monitoring than in those who had standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system (standardised mean difference 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 6.9) mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure was lower by 2.4 (1.2 to 3.5) mm Hg, and mean blood pressure was lower by 4.4 (2.0 to 6.8) mm Hg. The relative risk of blood pressure above predetermined targets was lower in people with home blood pressure monitoring (risk ratio 0.90, 0.80 to 1.00). When publication bias was allowed for, the differences were attenuated: 2.2 (-0.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1.9 (0.6 to 3.2) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure.Conclusions Blood pressure control in people with hypertension (assessed in the clinic) and the proportion achieving targets are increased when home blood pressure monitoring is used rather than standard blood pressure monitoring in the healthcare system. The reasons for this are not clear. The difference in blood pressure control between the two methods is small but likely to contribute to an important reduction in vascular complications in the hypertensive population.     

Quality of care in managing hypertension by case finding in north west London.

The records of patients who were registered with general practice in inner London and outer London (both training and non-training practices) were examined for details of blood pressure recordings. A blood pressure recording was found in the past five years in only 22% of the notes of inner London practices but in 43% of notes in outer London practices, there being no difference between training and non-training practices. In 31% of the notes with a blood pressure recording the blood pressure had been raised (greater than or equal to 160/90) at some time: in 62% of these notes for patients aged 65 or more and in 52% of these notes for patients aged under 65 treatment had been given at some time. Thirty eight per cent of patients in the older group and 33% in the younger group were being treated at the time of the survey, thiazides being the most commonly used drugs. Thirty four per cent of all those with a raised blood pressure at some time had a latest recording of under 90 mm Hg diastolic. There seems to be a continuing need for general practitioners to detect and treat hypertension, and it is suggested that general practitioners should consider using systematic case finding for hypertension in their practices.     

Prolonged blood pressure reduction by orally active renin inhibitor RO 42-5892 in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the effects of a novel specific renin inhibitor, RO 42-5892, with high affinity for human renin (Ki = 0.5 x 10(-9) mol/l), on plasma renin activity and angiotensin II concentration and on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure in essential hypertension. DESIGN--Exploratory study in which active treatment was preceded by placebo. SETTING--Inpatient unit of teaching hospital. PATIENTS--Nine men with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had a normal sodium intake. INTERVENTIONS--Two single intravenous doses of RO 42-5892 (100 and 1,000 micrograms/kg in 10 minutes) given to six patients and one single oral dose (600 mg) given to the three others as well as to three of the patients who also received the two intravenous doses. RESULTS--With both intravenous and oral doses renin activity fell in 10 minutes to undetectably low values, while angiotensin II concentration fell overall by 80-90% with intravenous dosing and by 30-40% after the oral dose. Angiotensin II concentration was back to baseline four hours after the low and six hours after the high intravenous dose and remained low for at least eight hours after the oral dose. Blood pressure fell rapidly both after low and high intravenous doses and after the oral dose and remained low for hours. With the high intravenous dose the daytime (0900-2230), night time (2300-0600), and next morning (0630-0830) systolic blood pressures were significantly (p less than 0.05) lowered by 12.5 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 19.7), 12.2 (5.4 to 19.3), and 10.7 (3.2 to 18.5) mm Hg respectively, and daytime diastolic pressure was lowered by 9.3 (2.2 to 16.8) mmHg. With the oral dose daytime, night time, and next morning systolic blood pressures were lowered by 10.3 (5.5 to 15.4), 10.5 (4.2 to 17.2), and 9.7 (4.0 to 15.6) mm Hg, and daytime and night time diastolic pressures were lowered by 5.8 (0.9 to 11.0) and 6.0 (0.3-12) mm Hg respectively. CONCLUSIONS--The effect of the inhibitor on blood pressure was maintained over a longer period than its effect on angiotensin II. RO 42-5892 is orally active and has a prolonged antihypertensive effect in patients who did not have sodium depletion. This prolonged effect seems to be independent, at least in part, of the suppression of circulating angiotensin II.     

Predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure shortly after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in primary care patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive medication is a more sensitive measure than seated blood pressure to predict blood pressure in the long term. DESIGN: Patients with previously untreated diastolic hypertension were treated with antihypertensive drugs for one year; these were withdrawn in patients with well controlled blood pressure, who were then followed for one year. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: 29 patients fulfilling the criteria for withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of seated and ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs. RESULTS: Eight weeks after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure returned to the pretreatment level on ambulatory measurements but not on seated measurements. One year after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure had returned to the pretreatment level both for seated and ambulatory blood pressure. For ambulatory blood pressure, the sensitivity and the positive predictive value eight weeks after withdrawal of medication were superior to those for seated blood pressure; specificity and negative predictive value were comparable for both types of measurement. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the results were not dependent on the cut off values that were used. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs predicts long term blood pressure better than measurements made when the patient is seated.     

Current management of hypertension in hospital.

A study of the notes of 1784 patients new to two London hospitals found a blood-pressure recording in 1027 (58%). Only 423 (32%) of all outpatients had had a blood-pressure recording on their first visit. Of 144 patients with hypertension (systolic greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg or diastolic greater than or equal 100 mm Hg or both) a check recording was made in 89 (62%) and 18 (12%) were put on treatment. We conclude that the opportunity that a hospital visit provides for blood-pressure screening is being incompletely used, and that the discovery of hypertension often does not lead to further action.     

Circadian Blood Pressure Rhythm in Primary and Secondary Hypertension

Circadian blood pressure variability was recorded in patients with primary hypertension and with different forms of secondary hypertension using ambulatory 24-h blood pressure measurement. A group of 20 patients with different forms of secondary hypertension was compared with a matched group of patients with primary hypertension. Although the mean 24-h blood pressure was not different between the two groups, the patients with secondary hypertension had significantly higher systolic blood pressure during sleep and higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the early morning, compared with the primary hypertension group. This nocturnal blood pressure fall was then investigated in various groups of patients with different forms of secondary hypertension and compared with normotensives and patients with primary hypertension. Patients with mild primary hypertension (n = 152) and with severe primary hypertension (n = 30) had the same blood pressure fall (14–16 mm Hg systolic and diastolic) during the night (23:OO–05:OO h) as normotensives (n = 20). However, in patients with renoparenchymal hypertension (n = 29), renovascular hypertension (n = 20), hyperaldosteronism (n = 6), and hyperthyroidism (n = 14), the nocturnal blood pressure fall was significantly (p < 0.01) reduced. One patient with coarctation ofthe aorta and nine patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and elevated blood pressure had a normal circadian blood pressure profile with a normal nocturnal blood pressure fall. The heart rate decrease during the night was equal in all patient groups. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement allows blood pressure recording under everyday conditions, including nighttime. In primary hypertension the blood pressure variability exhibits the same circadian variation as in normotension, showing a marked nocturnal fall. However, in different forms of secondary hypertension, blood pressure shows a blunted circadian curve. This could have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.     

Circadian blood pressure rhythm in primary and secondary hypertension.

Circadian blood pressure variability was recorded in patients with primary hypertension and with different forms of secondary hypertension using ambulatory 24-h blood pressure measurement. A group of 20 patients with different forms of secondary hypertension was compared with a matched group of patients with primary hypertension. Although the mean 24-h blood pressure was not different between the two groups, the patients with secondary hypertension had significantly higher systolic blood pressure during sleep and higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the early morning, compared with the primary hypertension group. This nocturnal blood pressure fall was then investigated in various groups of patients with different forms of secondary hypertension and compared with normotensives and patients with primary hypertension. Patients with mild primary hypertension (n = 152) and with severe primary hypertension (n = 30) had the same blood pressure fall (14-16 mm Hg systolic and diastolic) during the night (23:00-05:00 h) as normotensives (n = 20). However, in patients with renoparenchymal hypertension (n = 29), renovascular hypertensions (n = 20), hyperaldosteronism (n = 6), and hyperthyroidism (n = 14), the nocturnal blood pressure fall was significantly (p less than 0.01) reduced. One patient with coarctation of the aorta and nine patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and elevated blood pressure had a normal circadian blood pressure profile with a normal nocturnal blood pressure fall. The heart rate decrease during the night was equal in all patient groups. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement allows blood pressure recording under everyday conditions, including nighttime. In primary hypertension the blood pressure variability exhibits the same circadian variation as in normotension, showing a marked nocturnal fall.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

坎地沙坦酯治疗老年患者原发性高血压的疗效及安全性分析

目的:探讨坎地沙坦酯治疗老年高血压患者的疗效和安全性。方法:选取我院110例老年原发性高血压患者,随机分为观察组(坎地沙坦酯治疗)和对照组(依那普利治疗),对比分析两组患者药物治疗前、后的动态血压监测及相关指标。结果:经两个月治疗后,两组患者坐位收缩压(SBP)及舒张压(DBP)谷值均较基线明显降低,观察组下降幅度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组的总有效率为90.91%,明显高于对照组的76.36%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:坎地沙坦酯治疗老年患者原发性高血压疗效显著,可明显降低收缩压和舒张压,是治疗老年性高血压理想的制剂。     

Obese patients in medical intensive care unit: influence of counseling on weight loss and cardiovascular parameters

A case series of 12 obese patients admitted to medical intensive care unit (ICU) due to life-threatening diseases and the influence of weight loss on cardiovascular parameters is presented. We assessed body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, pulse, and laboratory values on admission. At discharge from ICU patients were counseled on how to lose weight. They were examined one and six months later. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease of body weight (median at the beginning of a treatment 134 kg, after six months 127.5 kg), BMI (median 41.5 kg/m2 at the beginning of a treatment; 38.9 kg/m2 after six months), systolic blood pressure (medians 145 mmHg and 130 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (medians 95 mmHg and 85 mmHg) and pulse (medians 104 beats per minute, 78 beats per minute) was found. The reduction of the waist circumference was not significant. One patient died due to severe acute pancreatitis. Patients reported feeling much better after losing weight.     

老年高血压患者颈动脉内膜中膜厚度与动态血压参数的相关性

目的:探究老年高血压患者颈动脉内膜中膜厚度(IMT)与动态血压参数间的相关关系,为老年高血压患者的临床治疗提供理论基础。方法:选取2015年1月至2016年1月在我院接受治疗的老年高血压患者204例,根据超声检查结果分为A、B、C三组,每组68例。24 h无创检测患者动态血压参数,包括24h平均收缩压(24h SBP),24 h平均舒张压(24h DBP)、白天平均收缩压(d SBP)、白天平均舒张压(d DBP)、夜间平均收缩压(n SBP)、夜间平均舒张压(n DBP),24h脉压(24h PP)及白天脉压(d PP)、夜间脉压(n PP),记录冠心病的发生率、杓型与非杓型高血压比例,利用Person相关性分析IMT与冠心病发生率及动态血压参数的相关性。结果:收缩压和脉压比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),其中B组、C组高于A组,C组高于B组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。非杓型高血压在A组占54.41%,B组占60.29%,C组占79.41%,各组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05);A组、B组、C组冠心病发病率分别为41.18%、54.41%和91.18%,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。IMT同冠心病发生率和24h SBP、d SBP、n SBP、24h PP、d PP、n PP呈正相关(r=0.876,0.448,0.378,0.476,0.443,0.491,0.438,P0.05)。结论:老年高血压患者收缩压,脉压升高以及非杓型高血压是造成颈动脉内膜中膜厚度增加的主要原因,同时,IMT与冠心病发病率和动态血压参数间呈正相关关系。     

Circadian Blood Pressure Variability in Normotensive Pregnant Women as a Function of Parity,Maternal Age,and Stage of Gestation

Studies based on conventional office blood pressure (BP) measurements concluded that both maternal age and parity have significant effects on BP during pregnancy. Previous results have also indicated predictable trends of BP variability with gestational age. Accordingly, we have evaluated possible differences in the circadian pattern of ambulatory BP as a function of parity, maternal age, and stage of gestation in normotensive women who were systematically studied by ambulatory BP monitoring during their pregnancies. We analyzed 1408 BP profiles obtained from 126 nulliparous and 109 multiparous pregnant women sampled for 48 consecutive h every 4 weeks from the first obstetric visit (usually within the first trimester of pregnancy) until delivery. Data were divided for comparative analysis according to parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), age (≤25, 26–30, 31–35, and ≥36 yrs), and trimester of gestation. Circadian BP parameters established by population multiple‐components analysis were compared between groups using a nonparametric test. A highly statistically significant circadian pattern described by a model that includes components with periods of 24 and 12 h is demonstrated for systolic and diastolic BP for all groups of pregnant women in all trimesters (always p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the 24 h mean among groups divided by parity at any age or stage of pregnancy. A trend of increasing BP with age was found for diastolic but not for systolic BP. Although statistically significant, differences in the 24 h mean of diastolic BP among groups divided by age were always less than 2 mm Hg. Data obtained from systematic ambulatory monitoring in normotensive pregnant women indicate the lack of differences in BP according to parity. The small, although significant, increase in diastolic BP with age may have scarce influence in the proper identification of women with gestational hypertension. Reference thresholds for BP to be used in the early identification of hypertensive complications in pregnancy could thus be developed as a function of the rest‐activity cycle and gestational age only, and independently of parity or maternal age.