Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of antiplatelet therapy among patients at high risk of occlusive vascular events.DesignCollaborative meta-analyses (systematic overviews).ResultsOverall, among these high risk patients, allocation to antiplatelet therapy reduced the combined outcome of any serious vascular event by about one quarter; non-fatal myocardial infarction was reduced by one third, non-fatal stroke by one quarter, and vascular mortality by one sixth (with no apparent adverse effect on other deaths). Absolute reductions in the risk of having a serious vascular event were 36 (SE 5) per 1000 treated for two years among patients with previous myocardial infarction; 38 (5) per 1000 patients treated for one month among patients with acute myocardial infarction; 36 (6) per 1000 treated for two years among those with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; 9 (3) per 1000 treated for three weeks among those with acute stroke; and 22 (3) per 1000 treated for two years among other high risk patients (with separately significant results for those with stable angina (P=0.0005), peripheral arterial disease (P=0.004), and atrial fibrillation (P=0.01)). In each of these high risk categories, the absolute benefits substantially outweighed the absolute risks of major extracranial bleeding. Aspirin was the most widely studied antiplatelet drug, with doses of 75-150 mg daily at least as effective as higher daily doses. The effects of doses lower than 75 mg daily were less certain. Clopidogrel reduced serious vascular events by 10% (4%) compared with aspirin, which was similar to the 12% (7%) reduction observed with its analogue ticlopidine. Addition of dipyridamole to aspirin produced no significant further reduction in vascular events compared with aspirin alone. Among patients at high risk of immediate coronary occlusion, short term addition of an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevented a further 20 (4) vascular events per 1000 (P<0.0001) but caused 23 major (but rarely fatal) extracranial bleeds per 1000.ConclusionsAspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardial infarction, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation. Low dose aspirin (75-150 mg daily) is an effective antiplatelet regimen for long term use, but in acute settings an initial loading dose of at least 150 mg aspirin may be required. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefits in some clinical circumstances, but more research into this strategy is needed.

What is already known on this topic

Antiplatelet therapy is effective for short term treatment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and unstable anginaLong term treatment is beneficial for patients who have had a myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attackDaily aspirin doses of 75-325 mg are effective

What this study adds

Antiplatelet therapy protects against vascular events among patients with stable angina, intermittent claudication, and (if oral anticoagulants are unsuitable) atrial fibrillationAntiplatelet therapy can be started promptly during acute presumed ischaemic stroke and continued long termDaily aspirin doses of 75-150 mg seem to be as effective as higher doses for long term treatments (and clopidrogel is an appropriate alternative for patients with a contraindication to aspirin)Short term addition of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevents vascular events in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention and those with unstable angina but causes increased bleeding     

Antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention – state of the art

Our objective is to provide the reader with an overview as well as an update on current antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Relevant journals were hand-searched by the authors to compile a broad but by far not comprehensive summary of innovative and clinically relevant studies. Aspirin, clopidogrel and the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin are the cornerstone therapy in secondary prevention after non-cardio-embolic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. A head-to-head comparison showed no difference in the prevention of recurrent stroke between dipyridamole plus aspirin and clopidogrel. More potent antiplatelet drugs or the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel prevent more ischaemic events, but also lead to more bleeding complications. For secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation is more effective than aspirin or the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel.     

Antiplatelet therapy--Part I.

We summarize current information about aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiac and vascular disease. For each indication, we briefly summarize the rationale for the use of antiplatelet therapy and describe the findings of relevant clinical trials. We propose recommendations for the use of these agents in clinical practice. Part I covers the use of antiplatelet therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, coronary thrombolysis, unstable and chronic stable angina, and coronary artery-saphenous vein bypass grafts. In part II we review the use of antiplatelet agents in coronary angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, artificial cardiac valves, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease.     

Antiplatelet therapy--Part II.

We summarize current information about aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiac and vascular disease. For each indication, we briefly summarize the rationale for the use of antiplatelet therapy and describe the findings of relevant clinical trials. We propose recommendations for the use of these agents in clinical practice. In Part 2, we discuss the use of antiplatelet agents in coronary angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, artificial cardiac valves, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. In Part 1, we reviewed the use of antiplatelet therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, in conjunction with coronary thrombolysis, in patients with unstable and chronic stable angina, and following coronary artery-saphenous vein bypass grafting.     

Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death,myocardial infarction,and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the effects of "prolonged" antiplatelet therapy (that is, given for one month or more) on "vascular events" (non-fatal myocardial infarctions, non-fatal strokes, or vascular deaths) in various categories of patients. DESIGN--Overviews of 145 randomised trials of "prolonged" antiplatelet therapy versus control and 29 randomised comparisons between such antiplatelet regimens. SETTING--Randomised trials that could have been available by March 1990. SUBJECTS--Trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control included about 70,000 "high risk" patients (that is, with some vascular disease or other condition implying an increased risk of occlusive vascular disease) and 30,000 "low risk" subjects from the general population. Direct comparisons of different antiplatelet regimens involved about 10,000 high risk patients. RESULTS--In each of four main high risk categories of patients antiplatelet therapy was definitely protective. The percentages of patients suffering a vascular event among those allocated antiplatelet therapy versus appropriately adjusted control percentages (and mean scheduled treatment durations and net absolute benefits) were: (a) among about 20,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 10% antiplatelet therapy v 14% control (one month benefit about 40 vascular events avoided per 1000 patients treated (2P < 0.00001)); (b) among about 20,000 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, 13% antiplatelet therapy v 17% control (two year benefit about 40/1000 (2P < 0.00001)); (c) among about 10,000 patients with a past history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 18% antiplatelet therapy v 22% control (three year benefit about 40/1000 (2P < 0.00001)); (d) among about 20,000 patients with some other relevant medical history (unstable angina, stable angina, vascular surgery, angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, peripheral vascular disease, etc), 9% v 14% in 4000 patients with unstable angina (six month benefit about 50/1000 (2P < 0.00001)) and 6% v 8% in 16,000 other high risk patients (one year benefit about 20/1000 (2P < 0.00001)). Reductions in vascular events were about one quarter in each of these four main categories and were separately statistically significant in middle age and old age, in men and women, in hypertensive and normotensive patients, and in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Taking all high risk patients together showed reductions of about one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction, about one third in non-fatal stroke, and about one third in vascular death (each 2P < 0.00001). There was no evidence that non-vascular deaths were increased, so in each of the four main high risk categories overall mortality was significantly reduced. The most widely tested antiplatelet regimen was "medium dose" (75-325 mg/day) aspirin. Doses throughout this range seemed similarly effective (although in an acute emergency it might be prudent to use an initial dose of 160-325 mg rather than about 75 mg). There was no appreciable evidence that either a higher aspirin dose or any other antiplatelet regimen was more effective than medium dose aspirin in preventing vascular events. The optimal duration of treatment for patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack could not be determined directly because most trials lasted only one, two, or three years (average about two years). Nevertheless, there was significant (2P < 0.0001) further benefit between the end of year 1 and the end of year 3, suggesting that longer treatment might well be more effective. Among low risk recipients of "primary prevention" a significant reduction of one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction was, however, accompanied by a non-significant increase in stroke. Furthermore, the absolute reduction in vascular events was much smaller than for high risk patients despite a much longer treatment period (4.4% antiplatelet therapy v 4.8% control; five year     

Transient ischemic attacks and stroke.

Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) constitute the most specific and powerful warnings of impending stroke. They are defined as brief, focal neurological events of sudden onset. Their proper recognition and treatment rank second only to the modification of risk factors in importance for stroke prevention. Carotid endarterectomy, although widely used to treat TIAs, remains unproven; randomized clinical trials are attempting to define its role. Anticoagulant therapy appears worth while for suspected cardiac embolism and possibly for disabling TIAs. Acetylsalicylic acid is the only agent that has been found to be effective in controlled trials, but questions persist about its dosage, its efficacy in women and its use after stroke. Another platelet inhibitor, ticlopidine hydrochloride, is being investigated and may prove to be an effective alternative.     

Synthesis, antiplatelet and antithrombotic activities of new 2-substituted benzopyrano[4,3-d]pyrimidin-4-cycloamines and 4-amino/cycloamino-benzopyrano[4,3-d]pyrimidin-5-ones

Atherothrombotic coronary artery disease, associated with deep vein thrombosis, is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Recently, antiplatelet combination therapy using agents with different mechanisms of action, such as aspirin, dipyridamole, and thienopyridines, seems to be an attractive preventive approach. Moreover, several large, randomized clinical trials support combination therapy with aspirin plus warfarin in high-risk patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. Our research on the benzopyrano[4,3-d]pyrimidine system gave rise to the synthesis of a large number of compounds endowed with in vitro anti-aggregating activity. Several SAR considerations suggest that the benzopyranopyrimidine system is an appropriate scaffold to obtain molecules that are able to act simultaneously in different pathways of aggregation. Now, we report the synthesis of new 2-substituted benzopyrano[4,3-d]pyrimidin-4-cycloamines and 4-amino/cycloamino-benzopyrano[4,3-d]pyrimidin-5-ones and the results of the pharmacological study on haemostasis. Some tested compounds showed a large-spectrum antiplatelet activity in vitro, and are more potent than aspirin as antithrombotics in vivo but, at variance with aspirin, they do not increase bleeding. This paper describes novel antithrombotic compounds with an interesting pharmacological profile and a potentially attractive benefit/risk ratio, with their mechanism of action generally, but not exclusively, dependent on antiplatelet activity, deserving further investigations.     

Synthesis of Novel 3-Butylphthalide Derivatives Containing Isopentenylphenol Moiety as Potential Antiplatelet Agents for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

In order to find novel antiplatelet drugs for the treatment of ischemic stroke, a series of 3-butylphthalide derivatives containing isopentenylphenol moiety were designed, synthesized and characterized with spectroscopic analyses. The in vitro antiplatelet activity results indicated that compound 3 better inhibited the arachidonic acid (AA) induced platelet aggregation than aspirin (ASP) and 3-butylphthalide (NBP). Additionally, compared with precursor NBP, compound 3 possessed outstanding antithrombotic activity in the animal experiment model, which could effectively alleviate the formation of tail thrombus and carotid artery thrombus in mice. More importantly, intraperitoneal administration of compound 3 can well protected the rats against ischemia/reperfusion-induced brain injury. Further pharmacokinetic (PK) assay indicated that compound 3 had good absorption characteristics and metabolic stability in vivo. Overall, the present research provides a new candidate compound for the treatment of ischemic stroke caused by platelet aggregation.     

Novel agents for anti-platelet therapy

Anti-platelet therapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with thrombotic diseases. The most commonly used anti-platelet drugs, namely, aspirin, ticlopidine, and clopidogrel, are effective in the prevention and treatment of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (e.g., abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban) have demonstrated good clinical benefits and safety profiles in decreasing ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome. However, adverse events related to thrombosis or bleeding have been reported in cases of therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Cilostazol is an anti-platelet agent used in the treatment of patients with peripheral ischemia, such as intermittent claudication. Presently, platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y(12) receptor antagonists (e.g., clopidogrel, prasugrel, cangrelor, and ticagrelor) are being used in clinical settings for their pronounced protective effects. The new protease-activated receptor antagonists, vorapaxar and atopaxar, potentially decrease the risk of ischemic events without significantly increasing the rate of bleeding. Some other new anti-platelet drugs undergoing clinical trials have also been introduced. Indeed, the number of new anti-platelet drugs is increasing. Consequently, the efficacy of these anti-platelet agents in actual patients warrants scrutiny, especially in terms of the hemorrhagic risks. Hopefully, new selective platelet inhibitors with high anti-thrombotic efficiencies and low hemorrhagic side effects can be developed.     

Thrombelastographic haemostatic status and antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery (TEG-CABG trial): assessing and monitoring the antithrombotic effect of clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone in hypercoagulable patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability, assessed by the thrombelastography (TEG) assay, has in several observational studies been associated with an increased risk of post-procedural thromboembolic complications. We hypothesize that intensified antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, as compared to aspirin alone, will improve saphenous vein graft patency in preoperatively TEG-Hypercoagulable coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients and reduce their risk for thromboembolic complications and death postoperatively. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial, with an open-label design with blinded evaluation of graft patency. TEG-Hypercoagulability is defined as a TEG maximum amplitude above 69 mm. Two hundred and fifty TEG-Hypercoagulable patients will be randomized to either an interventional group receiving clopidogrel 75 mg daily for three months (after initial oral bolus of 300 mg) together with aspirin 75 mg or a control group receiving aspirin 75 mg daily alone. Monitoring of antiplatelet efficacy and on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and aspirin will be conducted with Multiplate aggregometry. Graft patency will be assessed with Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) at three months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The present trial is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether TEG-Hypercoagulable CABG patients will benefit from intensified antiplatelet therapy after surgery. Monitoring of platelet inhibition from instituted antithrombotic therapy will elucidate platelet resistance patterns after CABG surgery. The results could be helpful in redefining how clinicians can evaluate patients preoperatively for their postoperative thromboembolic risk and tailor individualized postoperative antiplatelet therapy. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01046942.     

Effects of vitamin C and aspirin in ischemic stroke-related lipid peroxidation: results of the AVASAS (Aspirin Versus Ascorbic acid plus Aspirin in Stroke) Study

A condition of oxidative stress is known to occur in ischemic stroke, the current therapeutic intervention of which is largely limited to thrombolysis. To assess the effect of vitamin C - in conjunction to aspirin - in ischemic stroke-related lipid peroxidation, we measured plasma levels of ascorbate, of 8,12-isoprostanes F2alpha-VI (8,12-iPF2alpha-VI) and activities and levels of a broad spectrum of antioxidant enzymes and micronutrients in stroke patients randomized to receive, from stroke onset and up to three months, either vitamin C (200 mg/day) plus aspirin (300 mg/day) or only aspirin (300 mg/day). By the end of the first week, patients treated with vitamin C plus aspirin had higher vitamin C levels (p = 0.02) and lower 8,12-iPF2alpha-VI levels (p = 0.01) than patients treated with aspirin alone. The significance was maintained for the increase of vitamin C after three months of therapy (p < 0.01). The clinical functional outcome for both groups of patients similarly ameliorated after three months of treatment. We conclude that vitamin C, at the dose of 200 mg/day and in conjunction with aspirin, significantly decreases ischemic stroke-related lipid peroxidation in humans. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether the use of vitamin C may add clinical long-term beneficial effects in patients with stroke.     

Novel multi-functional nitrones for treatment of ischemic stroke

Ischemic stroke resulting from obstruction of blood vessels is an enormous public health problem with urgent need for effective therapy. The co-administration of thrombolytic/antiplatelet agent and neuroprotective agent improves therapeutic efficacy and agent possessing both thrombolytic/antiplatelet and antiradical activities provides a promising strategy for the treatment of ischemic stroke. We have previously reported a novel compound, namely TBN, possessing both antiplatelet and antiradical activities, showed significant neuroprotective effect in a rat stroke model. We herein report synthesis of a series of new pyrazine derivatives, and evaluation of their biological activities. Their mechanisms of action were also investigated. Among these new derivatives, compound 21, armed with two nitrone moieties, showed the greatest neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo. Compound 21 significantly inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation. In a cell free antiradical assay, compound 21 was the most effective agent in scavenging the three most damaging radicals, namely (·)OH, O(2)(·-) and ONOO(-).     

Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention

Antiplatelet agents are a cornerstone in the treatment of acute arterial thrombotic events and in the prevention of thrombus formation. However, existing antiplatelet agents (mainly aspirin, the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole and clopidogrel) reduce the risk of vascular events only by about one quarter compared with placebo. As a consequence, more efficacious antiplatelet therapies with a reduced bleeding risk are needed. We give an overview of several new antiplatelet agents that are currently investigated in secondary stroke prevention: adenosine 5′-diphosphonate receptor antagonists, cilostazol, sarpogrelate, terutroban and SCH 530348. There are unique features in secondary stroke prevention that have to be taken into account: ischaemic stroke is a heterogeneous disease caused by multiple aetiologies and the blood–brain barrier is disturbed after stroke which may result in a higher intracerebral bleeding risk. Several small randomized trials indicated that the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel might be superior to antiplatelet monotherapy in the acute and early post-ischaemic phase. There is an ongoing debate about antiplatelet resistance. Decreasing response to aspirin is correlated independently with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, there is still no evidence from randomized trials linking aspirin resistance and recurrent ischaemic events. Similarly, randomized trials have not demonstrated a clinical significantly decreased antiplatelet effect by the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. Nevertheless, a routine use of this drug combination is not recommended.     

A randomised controlled trial of triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole) in the secondary prevention of stroke: safety, tolerability and feasibility

Background

Aspirin, dipyridamole and clopidogrel are effective in secondary vascular prevention. Combination therapy with three antiplatelet agents might maximise the benefit of antiplatelet treatment in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A randomised, parallel group, observer-blinded phase II trial compared the combination of aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole with aspirin alone. Adult patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 5 years were included. The primary outcome was tolerability to treatment assessed as the number of patients completing randomised treatment. Recruitment was halted prematurely after publication of the ESPRIT trial (which confirmed that combined aspirin and dipyridamole is more effective than aspirin alone). 17 patients were enrolled: male 12 (71%), mean age 62 (SD 13) years, lacunar stroke syndrome 12 (71%), median stroke/TIA onset to randomisation 8 months. Treatment was discontinued in 4 of 9 (44%) patients receiving triple therapy vs. none of 8 taking aspirin (p = 0.08). One recurrent stroke occurred in a patient in the triple group who was noncompliant of all antiplatelet medications. The number of patients with adverse events and bleeding complications, and their severity, were significantly greater in the triple therapy group (p<0.01).

Conclusions/Significance

Long term triple antiplatelet therapy was asociated with a significant increase in adverse events and bleeding rates, and their severity, and a trend to increased discontinuations. However, the patients had a low risk of recurrence and future trials should focus on short term therapy in high risk patients characterised by a very recent event or failure of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Trial Registration

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN83673558     

Failure to monitor ticlopidine: the case for clopidogrel

AIM: Ticlopidine remains unlicensed for use in coronary artery stenting. Haematological monitoring at two-weekly intervals of all patients taking ticlopidine is recommended because of the risk of neutropaenia. The authors assessed their ability to monitor a two-week course of ticlopidine given to patients undergoing coronary stenting procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one unselected consecutive patients undergoing coronary stenting procedures were prescribed ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily for two weeks, in addition to aspirin. Prior to discharge home they and their GPs were given written information outlining the side-effects of ticlopidine and the monitoring procedures required. One hundred and thirty-three patients (94%) completed the full two-week course of ticlopidine; three (2.4%) developed significant neutropaenia (neutrophil count <0.5 x 10(9)/mm(3)). Patient compliance with full blood count monitoring was 85% at two weeks and 80% at four weeks. Two patients (1.4%) suffered subacute stent thrombosis. At six months, there were no deaths, one (0.7%) myocardial infarction and nine patients (6%) requiring target vessel revascularization. CONCLUSION: A two-week course of ticlopidine is well tolerated and does not appear to be associated with an increase in adverse cardiac events. However, even with a dedicated monitoring team, adequate haematological follow-up was achieved in only 80% of patients. The need for a licensed antiplatelet agent which has a lower side-effect profile and does not require haematological monitoring is obvious.     

阿司匹林、氯吡格雷及西洛他唑预防和治疗老年冠脉支架植入术后血小板高反应性的临床效果观察

目的:探讨阿司匹林、氯吡格雷及西洛他唑预防和治疗老年冠脉支架植入术后血小板高反应性的临床效果。方法:选择60例拟行冠脉支架植入术的老年患者,随机地分为加用或未加用200 mg西洛他唑负荷剂量组。术前、术后24小时及术后30天时检测和比较各组患者的血小板聚集功能。结果:三联抗血小板治疗组的PRU、ARU及P2Y12%inhibition值均较两联抗血小板治疗组显著降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。三联抗血小板治疗和两联负荷剂量的抗血小板治疗的给药时间(第一次投药至冠脉介入治疗的时间间隔)分别为10.2小时(95%可信区间:7.4-13.1小时)和7.8小时(95%可信区间:4.5-11.2小时),三联抗血小板治疗组术前HPPR(83.3%和46.7%,P=0.003)、术后24小时(36.7%和13.3%,P=0.018)及术后30天HPPR(40.0%和16.7%,P=0.045)的发生率均较两联抗血小板治疗组明显降低(P0.05)。在术后30天的随访观察期间,两联抗血小板治疗组2例患者出现支架内血栓,并进行了血运重建术;无1例心源性死亡、缺血性卒中及出血性并发症的发生。两组次要终点的发生率比较无显著性差异(P0.05)。结论:在两联抗血小板聚集治疗的基础上附加200 mg西洛他唑可显著降低冠状动脉支架植入术后血小板的高反应性。     

Aspirin Resistance: Clinical and Molecular Genetic Evaluation Techniques

The article discusses the issues related to the personalization of preventive measures for ischemic stroke, in particular those associated with resistance to one of the most common antiplatelet drugs, aspirin. A brief historical note on investigation of acetylsalicylic acid is provided. The paper addresses the issue of etiological factors and epidemiology of aspirin resistance. An analysis and comparison of various techniques for evaluation of this phenomenon are performed. Separately, a molecular genetic aspect of the pathology is considered. In conclusion, the recommendations for overcoming tolerance to aspirin therapy are provided.     

Aspirin Resistance in the Acute Stages of Acute Ischemic Stroke Is Associated with the Development of New Ischemic Lesions

Background

Aspirin is a primary antiplatelet agent for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. However, if aspirin fails to inhibit platelet function, as is expected in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), it may increase the rate of early clinical events. Therefore, we sought to determine whether aspirin resistance in the acute stage was associated with early radiological events, including new ischemic lesions (NILs).

Methods

This study was a single-center, prospective, observational study conducted between April 2012 and May 2013. Aspirin 300 mg was initially administered followed by maintenance doses of 100 mg daily. The acute aspirin reaction unit (aARU) was consistently measured after 3 hours of aspirin loading. An aARU value ≥550 IU was defined as biological aspirin resistance (BAR). NILs on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were defined as lesions separate from index lesions, which were not detected on the initial DWI.

Results

A total of 367 patients were analyzed in this study. BAR in aARU was detected in 60 patients (16.3%). On follow-up DWI, 81 patients (22.1%) had NILs, which were frequently in the same territory as the index lesions (79%), pial infarcts (61.7%), and located within the cortex (59.3%). BAR was independently associated with NILs on follow-up DWI (adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CIs 1.01–3.96; p = 0.047).

Conclusion

In conclusion, BAR in aARU could be associated with NILs on follow-up DWI in AIS. Therefore, a further prospective study with a longer follow-up period is necessary to evaluate the clinical implications of aARU in AIS.