Activation Domain-dependent Degradation of Somatic Wee1 Kinase

Cell cycle progression is dependent upon coordinate regulation of kinase and proteolytic pathways. Inhibitors of cell cycle transitions are degraded to allow progression into the subsequent cell cycle phase. For example, the tyrosine kinase and Cdk1 inhibitor Wee1 is degraded during G₂ and mitosis to allow mitotic progression. Previous studies suggested that the N terminus of Wee1 directs Wee1 destruction. Using a chemical mutagenesis strategy, we report that multiple regions of Wee1 control its destruction. Most notably, we find that the activation domain of the Wee1 kinase is also required for its degradation. Mutations in this domain inhibit Wee1 degradation in somatic cell extracts and in cells without affecting the overall Wee1 structure or kinase activity. More broadly, these findings suggest that kinase activation domains may be previously unappreciated sites of recognition by the ubiquitin proteasome pathway.     

Analysis of differential sensitivities of synchronized HeLa S3 cells to radiations and chemical carcinogen during the cell cycle. II. Ultraviolet light

UV-induction of thymine dimers in cellular DNA and their excision during different phases of the cell cycle of HeLa S3 cells were studied. Induction of thymine dimers was higher in the mitotic phase and the middle of the S phase than in the G₁ phase and from the late S phase to the early G₂ phase which are rather insensitive to UV. However, there is no significant difference in excision rate of UV-induced thymine dimers from the irradiated cells through the cell cycle. These findings indicate that the cyclic variation of UV-survivals during the cell cycle may be due to differences in the amount of thymine dimers in cellular DNA induced by UV-irradiation.     

The role and regulation of the preRC component Cdc6 in the initiation of premeiotic DNA replication

In all eukaryotes, the initiation of DNA replication is regulated by the ordered assembly of DNA/protein complexes on origins of DNA replication. In this report, we examine the role of Cdc6, a component of the prereplication complex, in the initiation of premeiotic DNA replication in budding yeast. We show that in the meiotic cycle, Cdc6 is required for DNA synthesis and sporulation. Moreover, similarly to the regulation in the mitotic cell cycle, Cdc6 is specifically degraded upon entry into the meiotic S phase. By contrast, chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis reveals that the origin-bound Cdc6 is stable throughout the meiotic cycle. Preliminary evidence suggests that this protection reflects a change in chromatin structure that occurs in meiosis. Using the cdc28-degron allele, we show that depletion of Cdc28 leads to stabilization of Cdc6 in the mitotic cycle, but not in the meiotic cycle. We show physical association between Cdc6 and the meiosis-specific hCDK2 homolog Ime2. These results suggest that under meiotic conditions, Ime2, rather than Cdc28, regulates the stability of Cdc6. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation analysis reveals that similarly to the mitotic cell cycle, Mcm2 binds origins in G1 and meiotic S phases, and at the end of the second meiotic division, it is gradually removed from chromatin.     

Nucleic acids methylation of synchronized BHK 21 HS 5 fibroblasts during the mitotic phase

The methylation of nucleic acids has been investigated during the cell cycle of an asparagine dependent strain of transformed fibroblasts (BHK 21 HS 5). The synchrony was carried out by a partial asparagine starvation of cells for 24 hours. The amino acid supply induced all cells to enter synchronously the G₁ phase. Methylation and DNA synthesis were respectively measured by pulsed [methyl-¹⁴C] methionine and [methyl-³H] thymidine incorporation. DNA methylation followed a biphasic pattern with maximal methyl incorporations during both S phase and mitosis. A partial desynchronisation induced the S phase of the second cycle to proceed before all the cells have achieved their division. Hydroxyurea was used in order to inhibit the DNA synthesis of cells entering the second cell cycle, which might interfer with the mitosis of the first one. The inhibitor was added either at the first beginning of cell division or during all the G₁ phase. In both conditions it suppressed ³H thymidine incorporation of the second cycle. However, mitosis took place and methylations occurred as in previous experiments. The DNA methylation of the mitotic phase in the first cell cycle could thus be dissociated from the classical post-synthetic DNA maturation and did not correspond to any DNA methylation appearing in the course of the second cell cycle.     

Commitment of Mitotic Cells to Meiosis during the G2 Phase of Premeiosis

In the developing anther, archesporial cells that proliferateby mitotic division are converted into meiotic cells duringthe premeiotic interphase. Experiments with explanted microsporocytesof Lilium and Trillium were made to obtain evidence for theconversion of mitotic to meiotic cells during the premeioticperiod. Explanted premeiotic cells were cultured through thedivision cycle at relatively high division frequencies and showeda variety of division types with respect to chromosomal events.The type of division depended on the premeiotic stage at whichthe cells were explanted. Cells in the G₁, S and early G² phasesunderwent mitotic division and formed a diad or binucleate monad.Cells explanted at the late G₂ phase were cultured throughoutthe normal meiotic cycle, which resulted in typical tetrad configuration. In microsporocytes explanted during the main part of the G₂interval, centromere behavior was meiotic, but chromosome pairingand chiasma formation were disturbed. Thus, she G₂ intervalwas shown to be critical for the commitment of mitotic cellsto meiotic division. Detailed analysis showed that the intracellularchanges that commit the cells to meiosis begin shortly aftercompletion of premeiotic DNA synthesis and that these changesare progressive and cumulative. (Received February 2, 1982; Accepted May 24, 1982)     

Regulation and Functional Contribution of Thymidine Kinase 1 in Repair of DNA Damage

Cellular supply of dNTPs is essential in the DNA replication and repair processes. Here we investigated the regulation of thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) in response to DNA damage and found that genotoxic insults in tumor cells cause up-regulation and nuclear localization of TK1. During recovery from DNA damage, TK1 accumulates in p53-null cells due to a lack of mitotic proteolysis as these cells are arrested in the G₂ phase by checkpoint activation. We show that in p53-proficient cells, p21 expression in response to DNA damage prohibits G₁/S progression, resulting in a smaller G₂ fraction and less TK1 accumulation. Thus, the p53 status of tumor cells affects the level of TK1 after DNA damage through differential cell cycle control. Furthermore, it was shown that in HCT-116 p53^−/− cells, TK1 is dispensable for cell proliferation but crucial for dTTP supply during recovery from DNA damage, leading to better survival. Depletion of TK1 decreases the efficiency of DNA repair during recovery from DNA damage and generates more cell death. Altogether, our data suggest that more dTTP synthesis via TK1 take place after genotoxic insults in tumor cells, improving DNA repair during G₂ arrest.     

Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis.

We have studied the patterns of expression of four B-type cyclins (Clbs), Clb1, Clb2, Clb3, and Clb4, and their ability to activate p34cdc28 during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During the mitotic cell cycle, Clb3 and Clb4 were expressed and induced a kinase activity in association with p34cdc28 from early S phase up to mitosis. On the other hand, Clb1 and Clb2 were expressed and activated p34cdc28 later in the mitotic cell cycle, starting in late S phase and continuing up to mitosis. The pattern of expression of Clb3 and Clb4 suggests a possible role in the regulation of DNA replication as well as mitosis. Clb1 and Clb2, whose pattern of expression is similar to that of other known Clbs, are likely to have a role predominantly in the regulation of M phase. During the meiotic cell cycle, Clb1, Clb3, and Clb4 were expressed and induced a p34cdc28-associated kinase activity just before the first meiotic division. The fact that Clb3 and Clb4 were not synthesized earlier, in S phase, suggests that these cyclins, which probably have a role in S phase during the mitotic cell cycle, are not implicated in premeiotic S phase. Clb2, the primary mitotic cyclin in S. cerevisiae, was not detectable during meiosis. Sporulation experiments on strains deleted for one, two, or three Clbs indicate, in agreement with the biochemical data, that Clb1 is the primary cyclin for the regulation of meiosis, while Clb2 is not involved at all.     

Relationships between Cell Cycle and Conjugation in 3 Hypotrichs*

SYNOPSIS. Relationships between the cell cycle and the beginning of conjugation were analyzed for 3 hypotrichs: Diophrys scutum, Oxytricha bifaria, and Euplotes crassus. The first 2 species enter conjugation with micronuclei in G₁; the latter species with a micronucleus in G₂. The 1st micronuclear division of conjugating E. crassus is mitotic. Thus meiotic DNA replication occurs when the cells of each species have already entered the mating process. Cells from asynchronous populations start conjugation with their macronuclei primarily in G₁ or more rarely at the beginning of the S stage in a percentage significantly different from that expected on the basis of random mating among all cells in the population. Also, macronuclear replication, when already begun, was blocked in cells undergoing conjugation. Therefore only the G₁ or the very early S stages of the cell cycle are compatible with conjugation in the 3 analyzed species.     

Regulation of the female mouse germ cell cycle during entry into meiosis

During mouse embryonic development germ cells proliferate extensively until they commit to the male or female pathway and arrest in mitosis or meiosis respectively. Whilst the transition of female germ cells exiting the mitotic cell cycle and entering meiosis is well defined histologically, the essential cell cycle proteins involved in this process have remained unresolved. Using flow cytometry we have examined the entry of female germ cells into meiosis, their termination of DNA synthesis and entry into prophase I. Analysis of key G₂/M cell cycle proteins revealed that entry into meiosis and cell cycle exit at G₂/M involves repression of G₂/M promoting Cyclin B1, coincident upregulation of G₂/M repressing Cyclin B3 and robust establishment of the ATM/CHK2 pathway. By contrast we show that the ATR/CHK1 pathway is activated in male and female germ cells. This data indicates that an important G₂/M surveillance mechanism operates during germ cell proliferation and that passage into meiotic G₂/M involves the combined repression of G₂/M through Cyclin B3 and activation of the key G₂/M checkpoint regulatory network modulated through ATM and CHK2. This work shows that the core regulatory machinery that controls G₂/M progression in mitotic cells is activated in female mouse germ cells as they enter meiosis.     

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN MOUSE EPIDERMAL BASAL CELL PROLIFERATION

Several kinetic parameters of basal cell proliferation in hairless mouse epidermis were studied, and all parameters clearly showed circadian fluctuations during two successive 24 hr periods. Mitotic indices and the mitotic rate were studied in histological sections; the proportions of cells with S and G₂ phase DNA content were measured by flow cytometry of isolated basal cells, and the [³H]TdR labelling indices and grain densities were determined by autoradiography in smears from basal cell suspensions. The influx and efflux of cells from each cell cycle phase were calculated from sinusoidal curves adapted to the cell kinetic findings and the phase durations were determined. A peak of cells in S phase was observed around midnight, and a cohort of partially synchronized cells passed from the S phase to the G₂ phase and traversed the G₂ phase and mitosis in the early morning. The fluctuations in the influx of cells into the S phase were small compared with the variations in efflux from the S phase and the flux through the subsequent cell cycle phases. The resulting delay in cell cycle traverse through S phase before midnight could well account for the accumulation of cells in S phase and, therefore, also the subsequent partial synchrony of cell cycle traverse through the G₂ phase and mitosis. Circadian variations in the duration of the S phase, the G₂ phase and mitosis were clearly demonstrated.     

Cell cycle analysis in a multinucleate green alga,Boergesenia forbesii (Siphonocladales,Chlorophyta)*

The cell cycle (nuclear division cycle) of a multinucleate green alga, Boergesenia forbesii (Harvey) Feldmann was studied using microspectrophotometry and BrdU incorporation techniques. Mitosis was observed frequently 1-4 h after the beginning of the light period, on a 16:8 h LD cycle at 25°C. Mitotic nuclei formed discrete patches. Other nuclei remained in the G₁ period. The DNA synthetic phase (S phase) was estimated to last about 12 h from microspectrophotometric study using aphidicolin inhibition just before the S phase and release from it. The G₂ period was estimated to be about 2 h, because a labeled prophase nucleus could be detected when the samples were labeled with BrdU continuously over 3 h. The incorporation pattern of BrdU changed through the S phase nucleus. In early S phase, BrdU staining was detected as many dots in the entire nucleus, while in late S phase, it was detected as several discrete regions along the nuclear membrane. Almost all nuclei in B. forbesii were in the G₁ stage after nuclear division, and the nuclei in several patches of the cell simultaneously initiated DNA synthesis. Once the nuclei entered into S phase, these nuclei continued into G₂ and mitosis. In other words, the cell cycle regulation of entrance into S phase from G₁ is an important factor in the growth and morphogenesis in B. forbesii.     

Variation In G1 Transit Time Relative to the Cycloheximide and Actinomycin D Drug Restriction Points

The transit time distribution at various points in the cell cycle of synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells was determined from the mitotic index, [³H]thymidine labeling index and increase in cell number monitored at regular intervals after mitotic selection. Variation in G₁ transit time compared with that for the total cell cycle indicates that variation in cell cycle transit time occurs mainly during G₁ phase. the cycloheximide (5.0 μg/ml) and actinomycin D (3.0 μg/ml) restriction points occur 0.2 and 1.7 hr prior to entry into S phase, respectively. the transit time distributions are further characterized by the moments of the distributions. the variance (2nd moment about the mean) of the transit time distribution at the actinomycin D restriction point is similar to the variance of the transit time distribution at the G₁/S border, thus variation in cell cycle transit time originates earlier than 1.7 hr prior to entry into S phase (i.e., the first 3/4 of G₁). If G₁ transit time variability and cell cycle control are related, then the results presented here indicate that the major regulatory events do not occur during late G₁ phase.     

Autoradiographic studies on the incorporation of3H-amino acids into chromosomes during the mitotic cell cycle ofHaplopappus gracilis

The synthesis of chromosomal proteins and the incorporation of labelled proteins into chromosomes in the mitotic cell cycle ofHaplopappus gracilis, 2n=4, were traced autoradiographically with³H-arginine,³H-lysine, and³H-tryptophane. The duration of the mitotic cell cycle in the root tip cells was determined by³H-thymidine autoradiography and was measured to be 13.0 hr (G₁ 1.3 hr, S 6.5 hr, G₂ 3.8 hr and M 1.4 hr).³H-arginine labelled proteins which were synthesized at S and G₂ were found to be incorporated into chromosomes to a greater extent than proteins which were synthesized either at G₁, at the transition phase from late S to early G₂, or at the mitotic phase. Such varied incorporation was also found in³H-lysine labelled proteins, but not in³H-tryptophane labelled proteins. These findings indicate that the chromosomal proteins are synthesized mainly at S and G₂. Some of the³H-arginine labelled proteins which were synthesized during the first mitotic cell cycle, were found to be incorporated into the chromosomes of the second mitotic cell cycle. The incorporation of the proteins synthesized at one stage of the mitotic cell cycle was found to occur locally in some regions of the chromosomes, while the pattern of incorporation was observed to be similar between euchromatic and heterochromatic regions.     

Cadmium cytotoxicity and variation in nuclear content of DNA in Euglena gracilis

Cultures of Euglena gracilis (strain Z from French CNRS collection) can be made cadmium resistant if grown in a medium with 5x10^-4M cadmium chloride. This resistance is reflected by the appearance of a second exponential growth phase. The development of this resistance was studied at the cellular level by determining the relative content of DNA at different stages of the cell cycle in an asynchronously grown culture. The culture was followed until the second, cadmium resistant, growth phase had reached its stationary state. During the first exponential growth phase, cells were mostly in the late period of DNA synthesis (stage S of the cell cycle), or in the gap preceding mitosis (stage G₂ of the cell cycle). In addition, some cells contained high multiples of the normal amount of DNA. In the beginning of the second exponential growth phase, a few cells were again in G₁ (the post mitotic stage of the cell cycle preceding DNA synthesis). These G₁ cells were predominant at the end of the second growth period. During the second stationary phase the DNA content of the cadmium treated cells was similar to the stationary phase of the control culture. Cells had stopped growing in G₁ with an unreplicated genome. The implications of these data are discussed.     

The Auto-ubiquitylation of E3 Ubiquitin-protein Ligase Chfr at G2 Phase Is Required for Accumulation of Polo-like Kinase 1 and Mitotic Entry in Mammalian Cells

The E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Chfr is a mitotic stress checkpoint protein that delays mitotic entry in response to microtubule damage; however, the molecular mechanism by which Chfr accomplishes this remains elusive. Here, we show that Chfr levels are elevated in response to microtubule-damaging stress. Moreover, G₂/M transition is associated with cell cycle-dependent turnover of Chfr accompanied by high autoubiquitylation activity, suggesting that regulation of Chfr levels and auto-ubiquitylation activity are functionally significant. To test this, we generated Chfr mutants Chfr-K2A and Chfr-K5A in which putative lysine target sites of auto-ubiquitylation were replaced with alanine. Chfr-K2A did not undergo cell cycle-dependent degradation, and its levels remained high during G₂/M phase. The elevated levels of Chfr-K2A caused a significant reduction in phosphohistone H3 levels and cyclinB1/Cdk1 kinase activities, leading to mitotic entry delay. Notably, polo-like kinase 1 levels at G₂ phase, but not at S phase, were ∼2–3-fold lower in cells expressing Chfr-K2A than in wild-type Chfr-expressing cells. Consistent with this, ubiquitylation of Plk1 at G₂ phase was accelerated in Chfr-K2A-expressing cells. In contrast, Aurora A levels remained constant, indicating that Plk1 is a major target of Chfr in controlling the timing of mitotic entry. Indeed, overexpression of Plk1 in Chfr-K2A-expressing cells restored cyclin B1/Cdk1 kinase activity and promoted mitotic entry. Collectively, these data indicate that Chfr auto-ubiquitylation is required to allow Plk1 to accumulate to levels necessary for activation of cyclin B1/Cdk1 kinase and mitotic entry. Our results provide the first evidence that Chfr auto-ubiquitylation and degradation are important for the G₂/M transition.     

Cell cycle arrest by prostaglandin A1 at the G1/S phase interface with up-regulation of oncogenes in S-49 cyc− cells

Our previous studies have implied that prostaglandins inhibit cell growth independent of cAMP. Recent reports, however, have suggested that prostaglandin arrest of the cell cycle may be mediated through protein kinase A. In this report, in order to eliminate the role of c-AMP in prostaglandin mediated cell cycle arrest, we use the-49 lymphoma variant (cyc^?) cells that lack adenylate cyclase activity. We demonstrate that dimethyl prostaglandin A₁ (dmPGA₁) inhibits DNA synthesis and cell growth in cyc^? cells. DNA synthesis is inhibited 42% by dmPGA₁ (50 μM) despite the fact that this cell line lacks cellular components needed for cAMP generation. The ability to decrease DNA synthesis depends upon the specific prostaglandin structure with the most effective form possessing the α,β unsaturated ketone ring. Dimethyl PGA₁ is most effective in inhibiting DNA synthesis in cyc^? cells, with prostaglandins PGE₁ and PGB₁ being less potent inhibitors of DNA synthesis. DmPGE₂ caused a significant stimulation of DNA synthesis. S-49 cyc^- variant cells exposed to (30–50 μm) dmPGA₁, arrested in the G₁ phase of the cell cycle within 24 h. This growth arrest was reversed when the prostaglandin was removed from the cultured cells; growth resumed within hours showing that this treatment is not toxic. The S-49 cyc^? cells were chosen not only for their lack of adenylate cyclase activity, but also because their cell cycle has been extensively studied and time requirements for G₁, S, G₂, and M phases are known. Within hours after prostaglandin removal the cells resume active DNA synthesis, and cell number doubles within 15 h suggesting rapid entry into S-phase DNA synthesis from the G₁ cell cycle block. The S-49 cyc^? cells are known to have a G₁/S boundary through M phase transition time of 14.8 h, making the location of the prostaglandin cell cycle arrest at or very near the G₁/S interface. The oncogenes, c-fos and c-myc which are normally expressed during G₁ in proliferating cells have a 2–3 fold enhanced expression in prostaglandin G₁ arrested cells. These data using the S-49 variants demonstrate that dmPGA₁ inhibits DNA synthesis and arrests the cell cycle independent of cAMP-mediated effects. The prostaglandin arrested cells maintain the gene expression of a G₁ synchronous cell which suggests a unique molecular mechanism for prostaglandin action in arresting cell growth. These properties indicate that this compound may be an effective tool to study molecular mechanisms of regulation of the cell cycle.     

Cell Synchrony Techniques. I. A Comparison of Methods

Abstract Selected cell synchrony techniques, as applied to asynchronous populations of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, have been compared. Aliquots from the same culture of exponentially growing cells were synchronized using mitotic selection, mitotic selection and hydroxyurea block, centrifugal elutriation, or an EPICS V cell sorter. Sorting of cells was achieved after staining cells with Hoechst 33258. After synchronization by the various methods the relative distribution of cells in G₁ S, or G₂+ M phases of the cell cycle was determined by flow cytometry. Fractions of synchronized cells obtained from each method were replated and allowed to progress through a second cell cycle. Mitotic selection gave rise to relatively pure and unperturbed early G₁ phase cells. While cell synchrony rapidly dispersed with time, cells progressed through the cell cycle in 12 hr. Sorting with the EPICS V on the modal G₁ peak yielded a relatively pure but heterogeneous G₁ population (i.e. early to late G₁). Again, synchrony dispersed with time, but cell-cycle progression required 14 hr. With centrifugal elutriation, several different cell populations synchronized throughout the cell cycle could be rapidly obtained with a purity comparable to mitotic selection and cell sorting. It was concluded that, either alone or in combination with blocking agents such as hydroxyurea, elutriation and mitotic selection were both excellent methods for synchronizing CHO cells. Cell sorting exhibited limitations in sample size and time required for synchronizing CHO cells. Its major advantage would be its ability to isolate cell populations unique with respect to selected cellular parameters.