Conformation-activity relationships of opioid peptides with selective activities at opioid receptors

The discovery of endogenous opioid peptides 25 years ago opened up a new chapter in efforts to understand the origins and control of pain, its relationships to other biological functions, including inflammatory and other immune responses, and the relationships of opioid peptides and their receptors to a variety of undesirable or toxic side effects often associated with the nonpeptide opiates such as morphine including addiction, constipation, a variety of neural toxicities, tolerance, and respiratory depression. For these investigations the need for potent and highly receptor selective agonists and antagonists has been crucial since they in principle allow one to distinguish unequivocally the roles of the different opioid receptors (mu, delta, and kappa) in the various biological and pathological roles of the opioid peptides and their receptors. Conformational and topographical constraint of the linear natural endogenous opioid peptides has played a major role in developing peptide ligands with high selectivity for mu, delta, and kappa receptors, and in understanding the conformational, topographical, and stereoelectronic structural requirements of the opioid peptides for their interactions with opioid receptors. In turn, this had led to insights into the three-dimensional pharmacophore for opioid receptors. In this article we review and discuss some of the developments that have led to potent, selective, and stable peptide and peptidomimetic ligands that are highly potent and selective, and that have delta agonist, mu antagonist, and kappa agonist biological activities (other authors in this issue will discuss the development of other types of activities and selectivities). These have led to ligands that provide unique insight into opioid pharmacophores and the critical roles opioid ligands and receptor scan play in pain, addiction, and other human maladies.     

Hydrocarbon stapled B chain analogues of relaxin-3 retain biological activity

Relaxin-3 or insulin-like peptide 7 (INSL7) is the most recently discovered relaxin/insulin-like family peptide. Mature relaxin-3 consists of an A chain and a B chain held by disulphide bonds. According to structure activity relationship studies, the relaxin-3 B chain is more important in binding and activating the receptor. RXFP3 (also known as Relaxin-3 receptor 1, GPCR 135, somatostatin- and angiotensin- like peptide receptor or SALPR) was identified as the cognate receptor for relaxin-3 by expression profiles and binding studies. Recent studies imply roles of this system in mediating stress and anxiety, feeding, metabolism and cognition. Stapling of peptides is a technique used to develop peptide drugs for otherwise undruggable targets. The main advantages of stapling include, increased activity due to reduced proteolysis, increased affinity to receptors and increased cell permeability. Stable agonists and antagonists of RXFP3 are crucial for understanding the physiological significance of this system. So far, agonists and antagonists of RXFP3 are peptides. In this study, for the first time, we have introduced stapling of the relaxin-3 B chain at 14th and 18th positions (14s18) and 18th and 22nd position (18s22). These stapled peptides showed greater helicity than the unstapled relaxin-3 B chain in circular dichroism analysis. Both stapled peptides bound RXFP3 and activated RXFP3 as observed in an inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP assay and a ERK1/2 activation assay, although with different potencies. Therefore, we conclude that stapling of the relaxin3 B chain does not compromise its ability to activate RXFP3 and is a promising method for developing stable peptide agonists and antagonists of RXFP3 to aid relaxin-3/RXFP3 research.     

Biological profiles of highly potent novel endothelin antagonists selective for the ETA receptor.

We describe novel potent endothelin (ET) antagonists that are highly potent and selective for the ETA receptor (selective to ET-1). Of the synthetic analogs based on ETA antagonist BE-18257A isolated from Streptomyces misakiensis (IC50 value for ETA receptor on porcine aortic smooth muscle cells (VSMCs); 1.4 microM), the compounds BQ-123 and BQ-153 greatly improved the binding affinity of [125I]ET-1 for ETA receptors on VSMCs (IC50; 7.3 and 8.6 nM, respectively), whereas they barely inhibited [125I]ET-1 binding to ETB receptors (nonselective with respect to isopeptides of ET family) in the cerebellar membranes (IC50; 18 and 54 microM, respectively). Associated with the increased affinity for ETA receptors, these peptides antagonized ET-1-induced constriction of isolated porcine coronary artery. However, there was a small amount of ET-1-induced vasoconstriction resistant to these antagonists, which paralleled the incomplete inhibition of [125I]ET-1 binding in the membrane of the aortic smooth muscle layer. These data suggest that the artery has both ETA and ETB receptors responsible for ET-1-induced vasoconstriction. The antagonists shifted the concentration-response curve to the right for ET-1 in the coronary artery, and increased the apparent dissociation constant in the Scatchard analysis of [125I]ET-1 binding on the VSMCs without affecting the binding capacity, indicative of the competitive antagonism for ETA receptor. In conscious rats, pretreatment with the antagonists markedly antagonized ET-1-induced sustained pressor responses in dose-dependent fashion without affecting ET-1-induced transient depressor action, suggesting that the pressor action is mediated by ETA receptors, while the depressor action is mediated by ETB receptors. In addition, pretreatment with the potent antagonists prevented ET-1-induced sudden death in mice. Thus, these potent ETA antagonists should provide a powerful tool for exploring the therapeutic uses of ETA antagonists in putative ET-1-related disorders.     

Endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor antagonists in cardiovascular remodeling.

Endothelins build a peptide family composed of three isoforms, each of them containing 21 amino acids. Endothelin-1 is the isoform mainly responsible for any cardiovascular action and therefore the sole scope of this review. Endothelin-1 is the most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor known; in addition it acts as a potent (co)mitogen. There is a substantial body of experimental evidence that endothelin-1 may contribute not only to sustained vasoconstriction, but also to remodeling within the cardiovascular system. Thus, with the help of endothelin receptor antagonists (available for a few years) the involvement of mainly ETA receptors in structural diseases such as heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, atherosclerosis, restenosis, systemic hypertension, and chronic renal failure has been shown. These data make endothelin receptor antagonists, and especially those selective for the ETA receptor, promising agents for the treatment of chronic cardiovascular diseases associated with remodeling. Currently several chemically distinct, orally available members of this novel class of therapeutic agents are under clinical investigation.     

Conversion of delta-, kappa- and mu-receptor selective opioid peptide agonists into delta-, kappa- and mu-selective antagonists

2',6'-Dimethyl substitution of the Tyr(1) residue of opioid agonist peptides and deletion of the positively charged N-terminal amino group or its replacement with a methyl group has recently been shown to represent a general structural modification to convert opioid peptide agonists into antagonists. This conversion requires the syntheses of opioid peptide analogues containing either 3-(2,6-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid (Dhp) or (2S)-2-methyl-3-(2,6-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid [(2S)-Mdp] in place of Tyr(1). Using this approach, delta-, kappa- and mu-selective opioid peptide agonist peptides were successfully converted into corresponding delta-, kappa- and mu-selective antagonists, whereby receptor selectivity was often maintained or even improved. Thus, two (2S)-Mdp(1)-analogues of the delta-selective cyclic enkephalin analogue H-Tyr-c[D-Pen-Gly-Phe(pF)-Pen]-Phe-OH turned out to be potent and selective delta antagonists. Most successful was the development of kappa antagonists derived from dynorphin A (Dyn A), including the highly potent and selective kappa-antagonist [(2S)-Mdp(1)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2) (dynantin) and the enzymatically stable octapeptide analogue [(2S)-Mdp(1),MeArg(7),D-Leu(8)]Dyn A(1-8)-NH(2). The (2S)-Mdp(1)-analogues of dynorphin B and alpha-neoendorphin also were kappa antagonists and may be useful as pharmacological tools in studies of kappa receptor subtypes. Finally, the Dhp(1)-analogues of the mu-selective cyclic enkephalin analogue H-Tyr-c[N(epsilon ),N(beta)-carbonyl-D-Lys(2),Dap(5)]enkephalinamide and of endomorphin-2 were moderately potent mu opioid antagonists.     

Discovery and design of novel vasopressin hypotensive peptide agonists

This presentation will trace the serendipitous discovery of novel vasopressin (VP) hypotensive agonists d(CH2)5[D-Tyr(Et)2,X3]VAVP (where X = Arg, Lys). These peptides were uncovered as part of an ongoing program aimed at the design of potent and selective VP antidiuretic (V2 receptor) antagonists. We will also present highlights of our subsequent preliminary studies seeking (i) to design high affinity radioiodinatable ligands for the localization and characterization of the putative VP vasodilatory (V1c?) receptor; (ii) to identify the structural features of selective and non-selective cyclic and linear VP and oxytocin (OT) antagonists of the V2 receptor, the vascular (V1a) receptor and of the uterine (OT) receptor required for hypotensive agonism and; (iii) to enhance hypotensive potency. These novel VP hypotensive agonists could serve as valuable research tools in studies on the roles of VP in blood pressure regulation and may also lead to the development of a new class of therapeutically useful antihypertensives.     

Recent advances in the biology of IL-1 family cytokines and their potential roles in development of sepsis

The IL-1 family comprises two anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-37, IL-38), two receptor antagonists (IL-1ra, IL-36ra), and seven ligand agonists (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-33, IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ). The members of this family exert pleiotropic effects on intercellular signaling, leading to pro- or anti-inflammatory responses. They initiate potent inflammatory and immune responses by binding to specific receptors in the IL-1 receptor family, and their activities are repressed by naturally occurring inhibitors. Various immune cells produce and are regulated by these crucial molecules, which appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of diverse diseases including cancer as well as inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Recent decades have seen substantial progress in understanding how the IL-1 family contributes to the development of sepsis. In this review, we will briefly introduce the IL-1 family and discuss its critical role in inflammatory and immune responses. The potential significance of IL-1 members in sepsis will also be explored, together with the clinical implications for treating this dangerous condition.     

Neuropeptides and Neuropeptide Receptors: Drug Targets,and Peptide and Non‐Peptide Ligands: a Tribute to Prof. Dieter Seebach

The number of neuropeptides and their corresponding receptors has increased steadily over the last fourty years: initially, peptides were isolated from gut or brain (e.g., Substance P, somatostatin), then by targeted mining in specific regions (e.g., cortistatin, orexin in the brain), or by deorphanization of G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs; orexin, ghrelin receptors) and through the completion the Human Genome Project. Neuropeptides (and their receptors) have regionally restricted distributions in the central and peripheral nervous system. The neuropeptide signaling is somewhat more distinct spatially than signaling with classical, low‐molecular‐weight neurotransmitters that are more widely expressed, and, therefore, one assumes that drugs acting at neuropeptide receptors may have more selective pharmacological actions with possibly fewer side effects than drugs acting on glutamatergic, GABAergic, monoaminergic, or cholinergic systems. Neuropeptide receptors, which may have a few or multiple subtypes and splice variants, belong almost exclusively to the GPCR family also known as seven‐transmembrane receptors (7TM), a favorite class of drug targets in the pharmaceutical industry. Most neuropeptides are co‐stored and co‐released with classic neurotransmitters, albeit often only at higher frequencies of stimulation or at bursting activity, thus restricting the neuropeptide signaling to specific circumstances, another reason to assume that neuropeptide drug mimics may have less side effects. Neuropeptides possess a wide spectrum of functions from neurohormone, neurotransmitter to growth factor, but also as key inflammatory mediators. Neuropeptides become ‘active’ when the nervous system is challenged, e.g., by stress, injury, drug abuse, or neuropsychiatric disorders with genetic, epigenetic, and/or environmental components. The unsuspected number of true neuropeptides and their cognate receptors provides opportunities to identify novel targets for the treatment of both central and peripheral nervous system disorders. Both, receptor subtype‐selective antagonists and agonists are being developed, as illustrated by the success of somatostatin agonists, angiotensin, and endothelin antagonists, and the expected clinical applications of NK‐1/2/3 (substance P) receptor antagonists, CRF, vasopressin, NPY, neurotensin, orexin antagonists, or neuropeptide receptor modulators; such ligands have efficacy in preclinical or clinical models of pain and neuropsychiatric diseases, such as migraine, chronic/neuropathic pain, anxiety, sleep disorders, depression, and schizophrenia. In addition, both positive and negative allosteric modulators have been described with interesting in vivo activities (e.g., at galanin receptors). The field has become more complex now that an increasing number of heteromeric neuropeptide receptors are described, e.g., ghrelin receptors with 5‐HT_2C or dopamine D₁, D₂ receptors. At long last, structure‐based drug discovery can now be envisaged with confidence, since crystal or solution structure of GPCRs and GPCR? ligand complexes, including peptide receptors, are published almost on a monthly basis. Finally, although most compounds acting at peptide receptors are still peptidomimetics, the last decade has seen the emergence of low‐molecular‐weight nonpeptide ligands (e.g., for orexin, ghrelin, or neurokinin receptors), and surprising progress has been made with β‐ and γ‐peptides as very stable and potent mimetics of, e.g., somatostatin (SRIF), where the native SRIF has a half‐life limited to 2–3 min. This last point will be illustrated more specifically, as we have had a long‐standing collaboration with Prof. D. Seebach to whom this review is dedicated at the occasion of his 75th birthday.     

Discovery of a series of pyrrolidine-based endothelin receptor antagonists with enhanced ETA receptor selectivity

Endothelins, ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 are potent vasoconstricting and mitogenic 21-amino acid bicyclic peptides, which exert their effects upon binding to the ET_A and ET_B receptors. The ET_A receptor mediates vasoconstriction and smooth muscle cell proliferation, and the ET_B receptor mediates different effects in different tissues, including nitric oxide release from endothelial cells, and vasoconstriction in certain vascular cell types. Selective antagonists of endothelin receptor subtypes may prove useful in determining the role of endothelin in various tissue types and disease states, and hence as therapeutic agents for such diseases. The pyrrolidine carboxylic acid A-127722 has been disclosed as a potent and ET_A-selective antagonist, and is currently undergoing clinical trials. In our efforts to find antagonists with altered selectivity (ET_A-selective, ET_B-selective, or nonselective), we investigated the SAR of the 2-substituent on the pyrrolidine. Compounds with alkyl groups at the 2-position possessed ET_A selectivity improved over A-127722 (1400-fold selective), with the best of these compounds showing nearly 19,000-fold selectivity.     

Molecular characterization of the ligand–receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y‐receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G‐protein coupled receptors. Structure–affinity and structure–activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site‐directed mutagenesis and anti‐receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y₁‐receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C‐terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY‐induced increase in food intake. Y₂‐receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo‐(28/32)‐Ac‐[Lys²⁸‐Glu³²]‐(25–36)‐pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21–36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y₂‐receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y₄‐receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y₄‐, but also to the Y₅‐receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y₁‐receptor. For the characterization of the Y₅‐receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala³¹‐Aib³². This motif has been shown to induce a 3₁₀‐helical turn in the region 28–31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y₅‐receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y₅‐receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY‐induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y‐receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors. Copyright © 2000 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Endothelin: A review of its effects and possible mechanisms of action

The recently identified endothelium-derived peptide, endothelin, is a potent vasoconstrictor, but also binds specifically to many types of smooth muscle and to nerve tissue. Endothelin has been detected in plasma and may have physiological or pathological functions. Like other agonists, endothelin increases the turnover of phosphatidyl inositol and liberates intracellular stocks of Ca²⁺. It also increases plasmalemmal Ca²⁺ permeability, an effect that is antagonized by calcium entry blockers in some tissues. However, the characteristics of this antagonism are not always typical of that seen when other types of agonists are employed. It seems that in at least some cell types endothelin might activate specific L-type Ca²⁺ channels indirectly, perhaps secondarily to the activation of another type of cation channel. The endothelin originally described is one of a family of peptides that are closely related to the sarafotoxins. The comparative pharmacology of these peptides and of some analogues of the originally described endothelin have revealed some surprising differences and may indicate the existence of different endothelin receptors.Special issue dedicated to Dr. Sidney Udenfriend.     

Functional endothelin/sarafotoxin receptors in rat heart myocytes: structure-activity relationships and receptor subtypes

Functional receptors for the peptides of the endothelin (ET) and sarafotoxin (SRTX) family were characterized in newborn rat heart myocytes using human and rat endothelins (ET-1 and ET-3, respectively), SRTX-b and SRTX-c. Binding studies in intact cells and homogenates revealed significantly higher affinities of ET-1 and SRTX-b than of ET-3 and SRTX-c towards these receptors. This binding profile of ET/SRTX peptides points to their interaction with the receptor subtype designated E-S alpha. All four peptides induced time- and dose-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis with the following rank order of potency: ET-1 greater than SRTX-b greater than SRTX-c greater than ET-3. Thus, ET-3 which possesses an intermediate affinity toward the receptor was the least effective with regard to this response. These results confirm and extend our earlier report that the ET/SRTX peptides interact with a newly characterized receptor(s) associated with phosphoinositide metabolism and Ca2+ mobilization. The initiation of inositol phosphate formation is largely independent of extracellular Ca2+, verapamil and nifedipine, indicating that the ET/SRTX peptides are not agonists for the voltage-dependent Ca2+-channels.     

Cardiac effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and related C terminal peptide fragment: increased inotropy or contribution to heart failure?

The contrasting pattern of cardiac inotropy induced by human peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) has not been satisfactorily explained. It is not clear whether ET-1 is primarily responsible for increased myocardial ET-1 expression and release with resultant inotropic effects, or for the induction of myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. There are at least two subtypes of endothelin receptors (ET(A) and ET(B)) and the inotropic effects of ET-1 differ depending on the receptor involved. Along with some other groups, we reported significant subtype-ET(B) endothelin receptor down-regulation in human cardiac cells preincubated with endothelin agonists (Drímal et al. 1999, 2000). The present study was therefore designed to clarify the subtype-selective mechanisms underlying the inotropic response to ET-1 and to its ET(B)-selective fragment (8-21)ET-1 in the isolated rat heart. The hearts were subjected to (1-21)ET-1 and to (8-21)ET-1, or to 30 min of stop-flow ischemia followed by 40 min of reperfusion, both before and after selective blockade of endothelin receptors.The present study revealed that both peptides, ET-1 and its (8-21)ET-1 fragment, significantly reduced coronary blood flow in nmolar and higher concentrations. The concomitant negative inotropy and chronotropy were marked after ET-1, while the infusion of the ET-1(8-21) fragment produced a slight but significant positive inotropic effect. Among the four endothelin antagonists tested in continuous infusion only the non-selective PD145065 and ET(B1/B2) selective BQ788 (in molar concentrations) slightly reduced the early contractile dysfunction of the heart induced by ischemia, whereas ET(A)-selective PD155080 partially protected the rat heart on reperfusion.     

Slow Receptor Dissociation Kinetics Differentiate Macitentan from Other Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Pulmonary Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells

Two endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), bosentan and ambrisentan, are currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a devastating disease involving an activated endothelin system and aberrant contraction and proliferation of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMC). The novel ERA macitentan has recently concluded testing in a Phase III morbidity/mortality clinical trial in PAH patients. Since the association and dissociation rates of G protein-coupled receptor antagonists can influence their pharmacological activity in vivo, we used human PASMC to characterize inhibitory potency and receptor inhibition kinetics of macitentan, ambrisentan and bosentan using calcium release and inositol-1-phosphate (IP₁) assays. In calcium release assays macitentan, ambrisentan and bosentan were highly potent ERAs with K_b values of 0.14 nM, 0.12 nM and 1.1 nM, respectively. Macitentan, but not ambrisentan and bosentan, displayed slow apparent receptor association kinetics as evidenced by increased antagonistic potency upon prolongation of antagonist pre-incubation times. In compound washout experiments, macitentan displayed a significantly lower receptor dissociation rate and longer receptor occupancy half-life (ROt_1/2) compared to bosentan and ambrisentan (ROt_1/2∶17 minutes versus 70 seconds and 40 seconds, respectively). Because of its lower dissociation rate macitentan behaved as an insurmountable antagonist in calcium release and IP₁ assays, and unlike bosentan and ambrisentan it blocked endothelin receptor activation across a wide range of endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentrations. However, prolongation of the ET-1 stimulation time beyond ROt_1/2 rendered macitentan a surmountable antagonist, revealing its competitive binding mode. Bosentan and ambrisentan behaved as surmountable antagonists irrespective of the assay duration and they lacked inhibitory activity at high ET-1 concentrations. Thus, macitentan is a competitive ERA with significantly slower receptor dissociation kinetics than the currently approved ERAs. Slow dissociation caused insurmountable antagonism in functional PASMC-based assays and this could contribute to an enhanced pharmacological activity of macitentan in ET-1-dependent pathologies.     

Benzothiazole-based N-(phenylsulfonyl)amides as a novel family of PPARα antagonists

The discovery of PPAR antagonists is emerging as an useful tool for elucidating the biological role of the receptor. Here we report the identification of N-(phenylsulfonyl)amides containing the benzothiazole scaffold, a novel class of potent PPARα antagonists obtained from chemical modification of carboxylic acid agonists. In this work, a group of phenylsulfonamides were synthesized and in vitro evaluated against the agonistic effect of GW7647; they showed an inhibitory effect on PPARα activation, with best compounds revealing a dose-dependent antagonistic profile. Some of these antagonists showed also an inhibitory effect on CPT1A pattern expression.     

Insect neuropeptide antagonists

The development of a new integrated approach to the generation of a novel type of insect neuropeptide (Np) antagonists and putative insect control agents based on backbone cyclic compounds is described. The approach, termed the backbone cyclic neuropeptide-based antagonist (BBC-NBA), was applied to the insect pyrokinin (PK)/pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN) family as a model, and led to the discovery of a potent linear lead antagonist and several highly potent, metabolically stable BBC antagonists, devoid of agonistic activity, which inhibited PBAN-mediated activities in moths in vivo. This review briefly summarizes our knowledge of insect Nps, describes the PK/PBAN Np family, presents the basic concepts behind the BBC-NBA approach, and introduces the advantages of this method for generation of Np agonists, antagonists and insecticide prototype molecules.     

Orthosteric,Allosteric and Biased Signalling at the Relaxin-3 Receptor RXFP3

Relaxin-3 is a neuropeptide that has roles in stress, memory and appetite regulation. The peptide acts on its cognate receptor RXFP3 to induce coupling to inhibitory G proteins to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate MAP-kinases such as ERK1/2, p38MAPK and JNK. Other relaxin family peptides can activate the receptor to produce alternative patterns of signalling and there is an allosteric modulator 135PAM1 that displays probe-selectivity. There are now a variety of selective peptide agonists and antagonists that will assist in the determination of the physiological roles of the relaxin-RXFP3 system and its potential as a drug target.     

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor subtypes S1P1 and S1P3, respectively, regulate lymphocyte recirculation and heart rate

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) influences heart rate, coronary artery caliber, endothelial integrity, and lymphocyte recirculation through five related high affinity G-protein-coupled receptors. Inhibition of lymphocyte recirculation by non-selective S1P receptor agonists produces clinical immunosuppression preventing transplant rejection but is associated with transient bradycardia. Understanding the contribution of individual receptors has been limited by the embryonic lethality of the S1P(1) knock-out and the unavailability of selective agonists or antagonists. A potent, S1P(1)-receptor selective agonist structurally unrelated to S1P was found to activate multiple signals triggered by S1P, including guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding, calcium flux, Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and stimulation of migration of S1P(1)- but not S1P(3)-expressing cells in vitro. The agonist also alters lymphocyte trafficking in vivo. Use of selective agonism together with deletant mice lacking S1P(3) receptor reveals that agonism of S1P(1) receptor alone is sufficient to control lymphocyte recirculation. Moreover, S1P(1) receptor agonist plasma levels are causally associated with induction and maintenance of lymphopenia. S1P(3), and not S1P(1), is directly implicated in sinus bradycardia. The sustained bradycardia induced by S1P receptor non-selective immunosuppressive agonists in wild-type mice is abolished in S1P(3)-/- mice, whereas S1P(1)-selective agonist does not produce bradycardia. Separation of receptor subtype usage for control of lymphocyte recirculation and heart rate may allow the identification of selective immunosuppressive S1P(1) receptor agonists with an enhanced therapeutic window. S1P(1)-selective agonists will be of broad utility in understanding cell functions in vitro, and vascular physiology in vivo, and the success of the chemical approach for S1P(1) suggests that selective tools for the resolution of function across this broad lipid receptor family are now possible.     

Discovery of INT131: A selective PPARγ modulator that enhances insulin sensitivity

PPARγ is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor family and plays a key role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. This Letter describes the discovery of a novel chemical class of diarylsulfonamide partial agonists that act as selective PPARγ modulators (SPPARγMs) and display a unique pharmacological profile compared to the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of PPARγ full agonists. Herein we report the initial discovery of partial agonist 4 and the structure–activity relationship studies that led to the selection of clinical compound INT131 (3), a potent PPARγ partial agonist that displays robust glucose-lowering activity in rodent models of diabetes while exhibiting a reduced side-effects profile compared to marketed TZDs.     

Novel linear antagonists of the antidiuretic (V2) and vasopressor (V1) responses to vasopressin

We report the solid phase synthesis of a series of 16 linear analogues of the cyclic antagonist of the antidiuretic (V2) and the vasopressor (V1) responses to arginine vasopressin (AVP), d(CH2)5[D-Tyr(Et)2, Val4]AVP(A). Peptide 1, the linear precursor of (A), (CH2)5(SH)-CH2-CO-D-Tyr(Et)-Phe-Val-Asn-Cys-Pro-Arg-Gly-NH2 was modified at position six with alpha-L-aminobutyric acid (Abu) to give peptide 2. Further modifications of the Abu6 analogue (No. 2) at position one by substituting cyclohexylacetic acid (Caa), cyclohexylpropionic acid (Cpa), 1-adamantaneacetic acid (Aaa), phenylacetic acid (Phaa), tert.-butylacetic acid (t-Baa), isovaleric acid (Iva), propionic acid (Pa), L-penicillamine (P), tert.-butoxycarbonyl (Boc) or omitting any substituent at this position, and/or in combination with Arg-NH2(9), Ala-NH2(9), D-Arg8-Arg-NH2(9), and desGly9 modifications yielded the remaining 14 peptides. All 16 peptides were examined for agonistic and antagonistic potencies in AVP V2 and V1 assays in rats. Apart from the Cpa analogue and the analogue lacking any substituent in the 1-position, all exhibit substantial V2 and V1 antagonism. A number are as potent as (A) as V2 antagonists. With an anti-V2 pA2 = 8.11 +/- 0.07, Aaa-D-Tyr(Et)-Phe-Val-Asn-Abu-Pro-Arg-Arg-NH2 (No. 6) is as potent as any cyclic AVP V2 antagonist reported to date. The PaI analogue of No. 6 exhibits promising anti-V2/anti-V1 selectivity. These findings prove conclusively that a ring structure is not a requirement for recognition of or for binding to AVP V2 or V1 receptors. This discovery thus offers a promising new approach to the design of peptide and non-peptide antagonists of AVP and perhaps also to other cyclic peptides such as somatostatin, atrial-natriuretic factor, insulin, and the recently discovered endothelin. Some of these linear antagonists may be of value as pharmacological tools and as therapeutic agents.