Aromatase inhibitors: assessment of biochemical efficacy measured by total body aromatase inhibition and tissue estrogen suppression

The implementation of aromatase inhibitors for treatment of early and metastatic breast cancer has been one of the major improvements in endocrine therapy of breast cancer. Measurement of endocrine effects of aromatase inhibition in vivo has been a major tool in the process of evaluating novel compounds. Biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in vivo may be determined from their effects on “total body aromatization” as well changes in plasma and tissue estrogen levels. Due to high sensitivity, tracer methods allowing calculation of whole body aromatase inhibition are still considered the gold standard. The method developed by our group in collaboration with the Royal Marsden Hospital and the results of this joint program are summarized and discussed. These studies allowed classification of the different aromatase inhibitors and their optimal dosage, selecting the best compounds for clinical evaluation. In vivo total body aromatase assessment is a work-consuming method, allowing such studies to be conducted in a limited number of patients only. In contrast, plasma estrogen measurement is a cruder but simpler method, allowing screening of larger groups of patients. As plasma estrogens arise through passive diffusion of estrogens synthesized in different body compartments, plasma estrogens, as well as total body aromatase assessment, present a rough estimate of total body tissue estrogen production, and changes associated with treatment with aromatase inhibitors reflect the effects on tissue estrogen production in general. However, plasma estrogen levels do not correlate to breast cancer tissue estrogen levels. This is due to the endocrine autonomy of breast cancer tissue with significant local estrogen production in some tumors. Thus, direct measurement of intratumor estrogens is demanded to evaluate the effects of aromatase inhibitors in malignant target tissues. Our group has developed a highly sensitive HPLC-RIA for the simultaneous measurement of estrone, estradiol, and estrone sulfate in malignant breast tissue samples, and we are currently using this method to assess alterations in intratumor estrogen levels during treatment with different aromatase inhibitors.     

Breast cancer tissue estrogens and their manipulation with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators

Despite the dramatic fall in plasma estrogen levels at menopause, only minor differences in breast tissue estrogen levels have been reported comparing pre- and postmenopausal women. Thus, postmenopausal breast tissue has the ability to maintain concentrations of estrone (E₁) and estradiol (E₂) that are 2–10- and 10–20-fold higher than the corresponding plasma estrogen levels. This finding may be explained by uptake of estrogens from the circulation and/or local estrogen production. Local aromatase activity in breast tissue seems to be of crucial importance for the local estrogen production in some patients while uptake from the circulation may be more important in other patients. Beside aromatase, breast tissue expresses estrogen sulfotransferase and sulfatase as well as dehydrogenase activity, allowing estrogen storage and release in the cells as well as conversions between estrone and estradiol. The activity of the enzyme network in breast cancer tissue is modified by a variety of factors like growth factors and cytokines. Aromatase inhibitors have been used for more than two decades in the treatment of postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer and are currently investigated in the adjuvant treatment and even prevention of breast cancer. Novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have been shown to suppress plasma estrogen levels effectively in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, knowledge about the influence of these drugs on estrogen levels in breast cancer tissue is limited. Using a novel HPLC-RIA method developed for the determination of breast tissue estrogen concentrations, we measured tissue E₁, E₂ and estrone sulfate (E₁S) levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during treatment with anastrozole. Our findings revealed high breast tumor tissue estrogen concentrations that were effectively decreased by anastrozole. While E₁S was the dominating estrogen fraction in the plasma, estradiol was the estrogen fraction with the highest concentration in tumor tissue. Moreover, plasma estrogen levels did not correlate with tissue estrogen concentrations. The overall experience with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators concerning their influences on breast tissue estrogen concentrations is summarized.     

Aromatase in the normal breast and breast cancer

Adipose tissue and muscle constitute the larger proportion of body mass, and therefore aromatization in these tissues is the major source of circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women. Although plasma estrogen concentrations are very low, levels in breast cancers from postmenopausal patients are reported to be 10-fold higher than in plasma and normal tissue. Whereas studies on aromatase activity in the tumor suggest that estrogen may be produced locally, the significance of this contribution has been questioned. Using immunocytochemistry (ICC) to an anti-aromatase antibody, a relatively strong immunoreaction was detected in tumor epithelial cells as well as in the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs) of the normal breast. Aromatase expression was detected in the cytoplasm of tumor epithelial cells and the surrounding stromal cells of over 50% of tumors in a series of 19 breast cancers. In situ hybridization (ISH) to aromatase mRNA confirmed the immunocytochemical result that the epithelial cells are the primary site of estrogen synthesis in the breast and breast cancers. In the 10 tumors which showed immunoreaction to aromatase, the average aromatase activity measured in cryosections was 286.5 ± 18.6 fmol estrogen/mg protein/h (SE), whereas in nine tumors with weak aromatase immunoreaction, the enzyme activity was 154.7 ± 19.3 fmol estrogen/mg protein/h (P < 0.05) (SE). The functional significance of tumor aromatase and locally produced estrogens on the growth of tumors was suggested by the correlation between aromatase activity and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a marker of cell proliferation (P < 0.005). Although intratumoral aromatase activity did not correlate with steroid receptors significantly, there was a trend for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors to express aromatase. In addition, proliferation ([³H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA) during histoculture, was increased by both estradiol and testosterone in tumors with high aromatase activity. Our results suggest that some tumors synthesize sufficient estrogen to stimulate their proliferation. It may thus be important to inhibit tumor aromatase as well as to reduce circulating levels of estrogen for effective breast cancer treatment.     

Aromatase and other inhibitors in breast and prostatic cancer

Estrogens have an important role in the growth of breast and other hormone-sensitive cancers. We have shown that 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) selectively blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting aromatase activity in ovarian and peripheral tissues and reduces plasma estrogen levels in rat and non-human primate species. In postmenopausal men and women, estrogens are mainly of peripheral origin. When postmenopausal breast cancer patients were administered either by daily oral or parenteral weekly treatment with 4-OHA, plasma estrogen concentrations were significantly reduced. Complete or partial response to treatment occurred in 34% of 100 patients with advanced breast cancer, while the disease was stabilized in 12%. We recently studied the effects of 4-OHA and other aromatase inhibitors, 10-propargylestr-4-ene-3,17-dione (PED) and imidazo[1,5-]3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrin-6-yl-(4-benzonitrile) (CGS 16949A) as well as 5-reductase inhibitors, N,N-diethyl-4-methyl-3-oxo-4-aza-5-androstane-17β-carboxyamide (4-MA) and 17β-hydroxy-4-aza-4-methyl-19norandrost-5-en-3-one (L651190) in prostatic tissue from 11 patients with prostatic cancer and six patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and from normal men at autopsy. We attempted to measure aromatase activity in tissue incubation by quantitating ³H₂O released during aromatization of androstenedione or testosterone labeled at the C-1 position. The amount of ³H₂O released from all samples was at least twice that of the heat inactivated tissue samples. The ³H₂O release was significantly inhibited by 4-OHA and 4-MA, but not by the other aromatase inhibitors. However, when HPLC and TLC were used to isolate steroid products, no estrone or estradiol was detected in the incubates. Furthermore, no aromatase mRNA was detected following amplification by PCR. The 4-OHA was found to inhibit 5-reductase in both BPH and cancer tissue, although to a lesser extent than 4-MA. The other aromatase inhibitors were without effect. Although a mechanism involving intraprostatic aromatase is not likely, inhibitors may act to reduce peripherally-formed estrogens. In postmenopausal breast cancer, the results indicate that 4-OHA is of significant benefit.     

Stepwise estrogen suppression manipulating the estrostat

Estrogen suppression is an effective endocrine treatment option in pre- as well as postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The fact that it produces clinical benefits not only in these two groups of patients that differ significantly with respect to plasma estrogen levels but also among patients with very low plasma estrogen levels due to previous hypophysectomy, adrenalectomy or treatment with first/second generation aromatase inhibitors, suggests estrogen deprivation to work independent of pretreatment plasma estrogen levels. Interestingly, in vitro studies have revealed MCF-7 cells to respond to estrogen deprivation by sensitization, causing maximum estradiol stimulation at a concentration 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁴ the concentration needed in wild-type cells. While results from recent phase III studies comparing novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators to conventional therapy have suggested that a more effective hormone ablation may be translated into an improved clinical efficacy, the biochemical rationale for lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators or aromatase inhibitors and megestrol acetate remains to be explained. Interestingly, patients becoming resistant to estrogen deprivation may still respond to estrogens administered in pharmacological doses. Future studies are warranted to explore alterations in gene expression and signaling mechanisms in response to different therapies in tumor tissue in vivo.     

Biochemical and computational insights into the anti-aromatase activity of natural catechol estrogens

High levels of endogenous estrogens are associated with increased risks of breast cancer. Estrogen levels are mainly increased by the activity of the aromatase enzyme and reduced by oxidative/conjugative metabolic pathways. In this paper, we demonstrate for the first time that catechol estrogen metabolites are potent aromatase inhibitors, thus establishing a link between aromatase activity and the processes involved in estrogen metabolism. In particular, the anti-aromatase activity of a set of natural hydroxyl and methoxyl estrogen metabolites was investigated using biochemical methods and subsequently compared with the anti-aromatase potency of estradiol and two reference aromatase inhibitors. Catechol estrogens proved to be strong inhibitors with an anti-aromatase potency two orders of magnitude higher than estradiol. A competitive inhibition mechanism was found for the most potent molecule, 2-hydroxyestradiol (2-OHE(2)) and a rational model identifying the interaction determinants of the metabolites with the enzyme is proposed based on ab initio quantum-mechanical calculations. A strong relationship between activity and electrostatic properties was found for catechol estrogens. Moreover, our results suggest that natural catechol estrogens may be involved in the control mechanisms of estrogen production.     

Relationship between aromatase activity and steroid receptor levels in ovarian tumors from postmenopausal women

Aromatase activity, as well as steroid receptors, exists in nonfunctional ovarian tumors. Steroid receptor status has been reported to be related to prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. We determined aromatase activity and progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen receptor (ER) levels in 43 ovarian tumors obtained from postmenopausal women. Aromatase activity was detected in 35 tumors (81%), PR in 21 tumors (49%) and ER in 13 tumors (30%). Eighty-three percent (10/12) of mucinous cystadenoma tissues showed positive PR with high aromatase activity, while 93% (13/14) of malignant tumors showed negative PR and low aromatase activity. Aromatase activity was detected in 95% (20/21) of PR-positive tumors, being greater than in PR-negative tumors (P < 0.002). There was a positive correlation between aromatase activity and PR (r_s = 0.49, P < 0.001). However, there was no correlation between aromatase activity and ER. In 17 patients (43%), the serum estradiol level was higher than 30 pg/ml and there was a positive correlation among estradiol, estrone, androstenedione and testosterone. However, serum steroid levels were not correlated with aromatase activity, PR or ER. Aminoglutethimide inhibited aromatase activity of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, uterine myoma, choriocarcinoma cells and purified human placental P-450arom in a similar manner. These results suggest that aromatase activity is correlated with PR in ovarian tumors of postmenopausal women. In addition to steroid receptor status, aromatase activity may be a useful prognostic factor in ovarian cancers.     

A three-dimensional model of CYP19 aromatase for structure-based drug design

Aromatase (CYP450_arom, CYP19) is an enzyme responsible for converting the aliphatic androgens androstenedione and testosterone to the aromatic estrogens estrone and estradiol, respectively. These endogenous hormones are a key factor in cancer tumor formation and proliferation through a cascade starting from estrogen binding to estrogen receptor. To interfere with the overproduction of estrogens especially in tumor tissue, it is possible to inhibit aromatase activity. This can be achieved using aromatase inhibitors. In order to design novel aromatase inhibitors, it is necessary to have an understanding of the active site of aromatase. As no crystal structure of the enzyme has yet been published, we built a homology model of aromatase using the first crystallized mammalian cytochrome enzyme, rabbit 21-progesterone hydroxylase 2C5, as a template structure. The initial model was validated with exhaustive molecular dynamics simulation with and without the natural substrate androstenedione. The resulting enzyme–substrate complex shows very good stability and only two of the residues are in disallowed regions in a Ramachandran plot.     

Multiple functions of aromatase and the active site structure; aromatase is the placental estrogen 2-hydroxylase

Androgen aromatase was found to also be estrogen 2-hydroxylase. The substrate specificity among androgens and estrogens and multiplicity of aromatase reactions were further studied. Through purification of human placental microsomal cytochrome P-450 by monoclonal antibody-based immunoaffinity chromatography and gradient elution on hydroxyapatite, aromatase and estradiol 2-hydroxylase activities were co-purified into a single band cytochrome P-450 with approx. 600-fold increase of both specific activities, while other cytochrome P-450 enzyme activities found in the microsomes were completely eliminated. The purified P-450 showed M_r of 55 kDa, specific heme content of 12.9 ± 2.6 nmol·mg⁻¹ (±SD, N = 4), reconstituted aromatase activity of 111 ± 19 nmol·min⁻¹·mmg⁻¹ and estradiol 2-hydroxylase activity of 5.85 ± 1.23 nmol·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹. We found no evidence for the existence of catechol estrogen synthetase without concomitant aromatase activity. The identity of the P-450 for the two different hormone synthetases was further confirmed by analysis of the two activities in the stable expression system in Chinese hamster ovarian cells transfected with human placental aromatase cDNA, pH β-Aro. Kinetic analysis of estradiol 2-hydroxylation by the purified and reconstituted aromatase P-450 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) showed K_m of 1.58 μM and V_max of 8.9 nmol·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹. A significant shift of the optimum pH and V_max, but not the K_m, for placental estrogen 2-hydroxylase was observed between microsomal and purified preparations. Testosterone and androstenedione competitively inhibited estradiol 2-hydroxylation, and estrone and estradiol competitively inhibited aromatization of both testosterone and androstenedione. Estrone and estradiol showed K_i of 4.8 and 7.3 μM, respectively, for testosterone aromatization, and 5.0 and 8.1 μM, respectively, for androstenedione aromatization. Androstenedione and testosterone showed K_i of 0.32 and 0.61 μM, respectively, for estradiol 2-hydroxylation. Our studies showed that aromatase P-450 functions as estrogen 2-hydroxylase as well as androgen 19-, 1β-,and 2β-hydroxylase and aromatase. The results indicate that placental aromatase is responsible for the highly elevated levels of the catechol estrogen and 19-hydroxyandrogen during pregnancy. These results also indicate that the active site structure holds the steroid ssubstrates to face their β-side of the A-ring to the heme, tilted in such a way as to make the 2-position of estrogens and 19-, 1-, and 2-positions of androgens available for monooxygenation.     

Prognostic significance of aromatase and estrone sulfatase enzymes in human breast cancer

The aromatase and estrone sulfatase enzymes are important sources of local synthesis of biologically active estrogens in human breast cancer. Significant intratumoral aromatase activity was detected in 91/145 (63%) of tumors and estrone sulfatase was detected in 93/104 (89%) of tumors. There was no relationship between aromatase activity and tumor size, site, nodal status, menopousal status or estrogen receptor status. There was a significant correlation between the aromatase activity and histological grade, with an excess of aromatase-positive in the high grade tumors (P = 0.03). There was a marginally inverse correlation between the aromatase activity and time to relapse (P < 0.1), a significant correlation between aromatase activity and survival after relapse (P < 0.05) but not with overall survival (P < 0.1). Intratumoral estrone sulfatase activity was not significantly correlated to any putative prognostic factors, nor with time to relapse nor overall survival time.     

Inhibition of aromatase: insights from recent studies

Aromatase is the rate limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. Blockade of this step allows treatment of diseases that are dependent upon estrogen. Over the past two decades, highly potent and specific aromatase inhibitors have been developed which block total body aromatization by over 99%. An important recent question is whether aromatase inhibitors are superior to the antiestrogens for treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. The third generation aromatase inhibitors have been compared to tamoxifen for the treatment of breast cancer in the advanced, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. All of these studies suggest the superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen. The mechanism responsible for the superiority of the aromatase inhibitors relates to the estrogen agonistic effects of tamoxifen. During exposure to estrogen deprived conditions and to tamoxifen, breast cancer cells adapt and upregulate the MAP kinase and PI-3 kinase pathways. These growth factor signaling pathways potentiate the estrogen agonistic properties of tamoxifen. Data from a large adjuvant therapy trial (ATAC trial) provide evidence that the aromatase inhibitors may also be superior for breast cancer prevention. The mechanism for superiority in this setting probably relates to the genotoxic effects of estradiol metabolites. The aromatase inhibitors may be also useful for the treatment of endometriosis and for ovulation induction as evidenced by preliminary data. The recent advances in development of the aromatase inhibitors clearly demonstrate the utility of these agents for treatment of breast cancer and potentially for other indications.     

Structure-activity relationships of 2-, 4-, or 6-substituted estrogens as aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase, which is responsible for the conversion of androgens to estrogens, is a potential therapeutic target for the selective lowering of estrogen levels in patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer. To develop a novel class of aromatase inhibitors, we tested series of 2- and 4-substituted (halogeno, methyl, formyl, methoxy, nitro, and amino) estrones (7 and 9), as well as series of 6alpha- and 6beta-substituted (alkyl, phenalkyl, and alkoxy) estrones (13 and 14), and their estradiol analogs (8, 10, 11, and 12) as aromatase inhibitors. All of the inhibitors examined blocked the androstenedione aromatization in a competitive manner. Introduction of halogeno and methyl functions at C-2 of estrone as well as that of a phenalkyl or methyl function at the C-6alpha or C-6beta position markedly increased affinity to aromatase (apparent K(i) value=0.10-0.66 microM for the inhibitors versus 2.5 microM for estrone). 6alpha-Phenylestrone (13c) was the most powerful inhibitor among the estrogens studied, and its affinity was comparable to that of the androgen substrate androstenedione. Estradiol analogs were much weaker inhibitors than the corresponding estrone compounds in each series, indicating that the 17-carbonyl group plays a critical role in the formation of a thermodynamically stable enzyme-inhibitor complex.     

The efficacy of CGS 20267 in suppressing estrogen biosynthesis in patients with advanced stage breast cancer

The pharmacologic inhibition of aromatase activity has been the focus of clinical trials in patients with advanced stage breast cancer. Recent developments with imidazole compounds that inhibit aromatase activity suggest their clinical use as potent inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. In this Phase I, open-label, dose-range finding study, we examined the inhibitory potency of CGS 20267 on blood and urine levels of estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate in 8 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Studies included evaluation of adrenal and thyroid function to look for evidence of general hydroxylase inhibition at dose levels effective for aromatase blockade. Patients were administered CGS 20267 at doses of 0.1 and 0.25 mg, once a day in ascending doses over a 12-week period. Preliminary data reveal that CGS 20267 elicits a striking suppression in plasma estradiol, estrone and estrone sulphate which was observed in some patients as quickly as within 24 h of the first dose. Estrogen suppression of over 90% was achieved within 2 weeks of therapy. No alterations in either baseline or ACTH (cortrosyn) stimulated cortisol and aldosterone levels were observed through the 12 weeks of therapy. In addition, 24 h urine sodium and potassium values were not appreciably altered during therapy. We conclude that CGS 20267 is a potent, specific inhibitor of estrogen biosynthesis in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and effectively reduces blood and urine estrogens to undetectable levels.     

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

A number of inhibitors of estrogen synthesis are now becoming available which could be of value in the treatment of breast cancer. 4-Hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first of these compounds to enter the clinic has been found to be effective in postmenopausal patients who have relapsed from tamoxifen. Thus, in studies of 240 patients, 26% patients experienced partial or complete response to treatment. An additional 25% patients had disease stabilization. 4-OHA is a potent selective, steroidal inhibitor which causes inactivation of aromatase in vitro. It is effective in reducing concentrations of ovarian estrogens in rats and of ovarian and peripheral estrogens in non-human primate species. The compound has been shown to lower serum estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. However, not all of these patients experienced disease remission, suggesting that their tumors were hormone insensitive rather than that the dose of 4-OHA was suboptimal. In trials of patients who had not received prior tamoxifen treatment, 4-OHA (250 mg i.m. every 2 weeks) was found to induce complete or partial tumor regression in 33% of patients. The response of patients was not significantly different from that observed in patients treated with tamoxifen (30 mg o.d) of 37%. No significant difference between treatments was observed for disease stabilization, the duration of response or median survival. Several other steroidal aromatase inhibitors have been studied, such as 7-substituted androstenedione derivatives. MDL 18962 [10-(2-propynyl)estr-4-ene-3,17-dione] and FCE 24304 (6-methylen-androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione) are currently in clinical trials. Non-steroidal inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 enzymes, such as imidazole and triazole derivatives have been developed which are highly selective for aromatase. Three triazoles which are very potent and selective inhibitors are vorazole (6-[(4-chlorophenyl)(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-methyl]1-methyl-1H-benzotriazole R 76713, arimidex 2,2′[5-( -1,2,4-triazol-1-yl methyl)-1,3-phenylene]bis(2-methylpropiononitrile) (ZD1033) and letrozole 4-[1-(cyanophenyl)-1-(1,2,4-triazolyl)methyl]benzonitril (CGS 20267). These compounds reduce serum estradiol concentration to undetectable levels in breast cancer patients. These highly potent inhibitors provide the opportunity to determine whether a further degree of estrogen suppression will be important in producing greater clinical response. With the recent approval of 4-OHA in several countries and the introduction of the potent new compounds, aromatase inhibitors either alone or in combination with the antiestrogen are likely to improve the treatment of breast cancer.     

Role of steroid sulfatase in local formation of estrogen in post-menopausal breast cancer patients

More than two-thirds of breast cancers occur in post-menopausal women, and depend on the estrogens for their proliferation and survival. For the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancers, two major treatment options are now available. One is selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) such as Tamoxifen and another is aromatase inhibitor such as Anastrozole, Letrozole and Exemestane, which reduce local in situ formation of estrogens. Although these therapies are clinically active for advanced and early breast cancers, de novo and/or acquired resistance to SERM and/or aromatase inhibitors are also clinical problem. Recent studies suggest that local formation of estrogens in the breast tumors is more important than circulating estrogen in plasma for the growth and survival of estrogen-dependent breast cancer in post-menopausal women. The rationale for the importance of local formation of estrogens is based on the following evidences. Estradiol (E2) levels in breast tumors are equivalent to those of pre-menopausal patients, although plasma E2 levels are 50-fold lower after menopause. E2 concentrations in breast tumors of post-menopausal women are 10–40 times higher than serum level. Biosynthesis of estrogens in breast tumors tissues occurs via two major different routes, one is aromatase pathway and another is steroid-sulfatase (STS) pathway. Whereas many studies has been reported about aromatase inhibitor and its clinical trial results in breast cancer patients, limited information are available regarding to other estrogen regulating enzymes including STS, its role in breast tumors and STS inhibitors. STS is the enzyme that hydrolyses estrone 3-sulfate (E₁S) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) to their active un-sulfoconjugated forms, thereby stimulating the growth and survival of estrogen-dependent breast tumors. It has been well known that E₁S level are much higher than E2 level both in plasma and tumor of post-menopausal patients. Recent reports show that more than 80% of breast tumors are stained with anti-STS antibody and the expression of STS is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Taking these findings into consideration, local formation of estrogens could be partially synthesized from large amount of E₁S by STS, which exist in breast cancer. On the other hand, aromatase localizes in stroma and adipocyte surrounding breast cancer. Furthermore, since estrogen formation from E₁S and DHEA-S (STS pathway) cannot be blocked by aromatase inhibitors, STS is thought to be a new molecular target for the treatment of estrogen-dependent tumor post-SERM and/or aromatase inhibitors. In this symposium, these recent rationale for the importance of STS in post-menopausal breast cancer patients is reviewed as well as STS inhibitor.     

Recent progress in development of aromatase inhibitors

In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase, which is the enzyme converting androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol, is the rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The currently available aromatase inhibitor, aminogluethimide, effectively blocks estrogen production and produces tumor regressions in patients previously treated with tamoxifen. This drug, however, produces frequent side effects and blocks steroidogenic steps other than the aromatase enzyme. Thus, newer aromatase inhibitors with greater potency and specificity are under intense study. More than 20 such compounds have recently been developed. In several clinical trials, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione, given parenterally, has been highly active and specific for aromatase inhibition in patients with breast cancer. In two large recent studies, one-third of heavily pretreated women experienced objective tumor regression with this therapy. CGS 16949A, a newer agent, is also Phase II clinical trials. This compound is an imidazole derivative with nearly 1000-fold greater potency than aminoglutethimide. An initial Phase I study compared the potency of 0.6–16 mg daily in 12 postmenopausal women and found maximal suppression of urinary and plasma estrogens with 2 mg daily. The degree of inhibition was similar to that induced by aminoglutethimide or by surgical adrenalectomy. No CNS, hematologic or biochemical toxicity was observed. A larger Phase II study in 54 patients confirmed this high degree of potency of CGS since a plateau effect was observed at the 1.8, 2 and 4 mg daily doses. The endocrine effects were not absolutely specific as a blunting of ACTH-stimulated but not basal aldosterone levels were observed. This and other emerging aromatase inhibitors offer promise as pharmacologic methods to inhibit estrogen production specifically and without side effects.     

Effect of antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitor on basal growth of the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 in serum-free medium

Antiestrogens are efficient inhibitors of estrogen-mediated growth of human breast cancer. Besides inhibiting estradiol-stimulated growth, antiestrogens may have a direct growth-inhibitory effect on estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells and thus be more efficient than aromatase inhibitors, which will only abrogate estrogen-dependent tumor growth. To address this issue, we have used the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7/S9 as a model system which is maintained in a chemically defined medium without serum and estrogen. The addition of estradiol results in an increase in cell growth rate. Thus, the MCF-7/S9 cell line is estrogen-responsive but not estrogen-dependent. Three different types of antiestrogens, namely tamoxifen, ICI 182,780 and EM-652 were found to exert a significant and dose-dependent inhibition of basal growth of MCF-7/S9 cells. The growth-inhibitory effect of the three antiestrogens was prevented by simultaneous estradiol treatment. Antiestrogen treatment also reduced the basal pS2 mRNA expression level, thus indicating spontaneous estrogenic activity in the cells. However, treatment with the aromatase inhibitor had no effect on basal cell growth, excluding that endogenous estrogen synthesis is involved in basal growth. These data demonstrate that in addition to their estrogen antagonistic effect, antiestrogens have a direct growth-inhibitory effect which is ER-mediated. Consequently, in the subset of ER positive breast cancer patients with estrogen-independent tumor growth, antiestrogen therapy may be superior to treatment with aromatase inhibitors which only inhibit estrogen formation but do not affect cancer cell growth in the absence of estrogens.     

Recent insight on the control of enzymes involved in estrogen formation and transformation in human breast cancer

The great majority of breast cancers are in their early stage hormone-dependent and it is well accepted that estradiol (E₂) plays an important role in the genesis and evolution of this tumor. Human breast cancer tissues contain all the enzymes: estrone sulfatase, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, aromatase involved in the last steps of E₂ bioformation. Sulfotransferases which convert estrogens into the biologically inactive estrogen sulfates are also present in this tissue. Quantitative data show that the ‘sulfatase pathway’, which transforms estrogen sulfates into the bioactive unconjugated E₂, is 100–500 times higher than the ‘aromatase pathway’, which converts androgens into estrogens.

The treatment of breast cancer patients with anti-aromatases is largely developed with very positive results. However, the formation of E₂ via the ‘sulfatase pathway’ is very important in the breast cancer tissue. In recent years it was found that antiestrogens (e.g. tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen), various progestins (e.g. promegestone, nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, dydrogesterone, norelgestromin), tibolone and its metabolites, as well as other steroidal (e.g. sulfamates) and non-steroidal compounds, are potent sulfatase inhibitors. In another series of studies, it was found that E₂ itself has a strong anti-sulfatase action. This paradoxical effect of E₂ adds a new biological response of this hormone and could be related to estrogen replacement therapy in which it was observed to have either no effect or to decrease breast cancer mortality in postmenopausal women. Interesting information is that high expression of steroid sulfatase mRNA predicts a poor prognosis in patients with +ER. These progestins, as well as tibolone, can also block the conversion of estrone to estradiol by the inhibition of the 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I (17β-HSD-1). High expressison of 17β-HSD-1 can be an indicator of adverse prognosis in ER-positive patients.

It was shown that nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone or tibolone, could stimulate the sulfotransferase activity for the local production of estrogen sulfates. This is an important point in the physiopathology of this disease, as it is well known that estrogen sulfates are biologically inactive. A possible correlation between this stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity and breast cancer cell proliferation is presented. In agreement with all this information, we have proposed the concept of selective estrogen enzyme modulators (SEEM).

In conclusion, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity in combination with anti-aromatases can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.