The production and emission of nitrous oxide from headwater streams in the Midwestern United States

The emission of nitrous oxide (N₂O) from streams draining agricultural landscapes is estimated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to constitute a globally significant source of this gas to the atmosphere, although there is considerable uncertainty in the magnitude of this source. We measured N₂O emission rates and potential controlling variables in 12 headwater streams draining a predominantly agricultural basin on glacial terrain in southwestern Michigan. The study sites were nearly always supersaturated with N₂O and emission rates ranged from ?8.9 to 266.8 μg N₂O‐N m^?2 h^?1 with an overall mean of 35.2 μg N₂O‐N m^?2 h^?1. Stream water NO₃^? concentrations best‐predicted N₂O emission rates. Although streams and agricultural soils in the basin had similar areal emission rates, emissions from streams were equivalent to 6% of the anthropogenic emissions from soils because of the vastly greater surface area of soils. We found that the default value of the N₂O emission factor for streams and groundwater as defined by the IPCC (EF5‐g) was similar to the value observed in this study lending support to the recent downward revision to EF5‐g. However, the EF5‐g spanned four orders of magnitude across our study sites suggesting that the IPCC's methodology of applying one emission factor to all streams may be inappropriate.     

Diurnal fluctuations of dissolved nitrous oxide (N2O) concentrations and estimates of N2O emissions from a spring-fed river: implications for IPCC methodology

There is uncertainty in the estimates of indirect nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions as defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The uncertainty is due to the challenge and dearth of in situ measurements. Recent work in a subtropical stream system has shown the potential for diurnal variability to influence the downstream N transfer, N form, and estimates of in‐stream N₂O production. Studies in temperate stream systems have also shown diurnal changes in stream chemistry. The objectives of this study were to measure N₂O fluxes and dissolved N₂O concentrations from a spring‐fed temperate river to determine if diurnal cycles were occurring. The study was performed during a 72 h period, over a 180 m reach, using headspace chamber methodology. Significant diurnal cycles were observed in radiation, river temperature and chemistry including dissolved N₂O‐N concentrations. These data were used to further assess the IPCC methodology and experimental methodology used. River NO₃‐N and N₂O‐N concentrations averaged 3.0 mg L⁻¹ and 1.6 μg L⁻¹, respectively, with N₂O saturation reaching a maximum of 664%. The N₂O‐N fluxes, measured using chamber methodology, ranged from 52 to 140 μg m⁻² h⁻¹ while fluxes predicted using the dissolved N₂O concentration ranged from 13 to 25 μg m⁻² h⁻¹. The headspace chamber methodology may have enhanced the measured N₂O flux and this is discussed. Diurnal cycles in N₂O% saturation were not large enough to influence downstream N transfer or N form with variability in measured N₂O fluxes greater and more significant than diurnal variability in N₂O% saturation. The measured N₂O fluxes, extrapolated over the study reach area, represented only 6 × 10⁻⁴% of the NO₃‐N that passed through the study reach over a 72 h period. This is only 0.1% of the IPCC calculated flux.     

Comparison of measured and EF5-r-derived N2O fluxes from a spring-fed river

There is considerable uncertainty in the estimates of indirect N₂O emissions as defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) methodology. Direct measurements of N₂O yields and fluxes in aquatic river environments are sparse and more data are required to determine the role that rivers play in the global N₂O budget. The objectives of this research were to measure the N₂O fluxes from a spring‐fed river, relate these fluxes to the dissolved N₂O concentrations and NO₃‐N loading of the river, and to try to define the indirect emission factor (EF5‐r) for the river. Gas bubble ebullition was observed at the river source with bubbles containing 7.9 μL N₂O L^?1. River NO₃‐N and dissolved N₂O concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 mg L^?1 and 0.4 to 1.9 μg N₂O‐N L^?1, respectively, with N₂O saturation reaching 404%. Floating headspace chambers were used to sample N₂O fluxes. N₂O‐N fluxes were significantly related to dissolved N₂O‐N concentrations (r²=0.31) but not to NO₃‐N concentrations. The N₂O‐N fluxes ranged from 38 to 501 μg m^?2 h^?1, averaging 171 μg m^?2 h^?1 (±SD 85) overall. The measured N₂O‐N fluxes equated to an EF5‐r of only 6.6% of that calculated using the IPCC methodology, and this itself was considered to be an overestimate because of the degassing of antecedent dissolved N₂O present in the groundwater that fed the river.     

Comparison of measured and EF5-r-derived N2O fluxes from a spring-fed river

There is considerable uncertainty in the estimates of indirect N₂O emissions as defined by the intergovernmental panel on climate change's (IPCC) methodology. Direct measurements of N₂O yields and fluxes in aquatic river environments are sparse and more data are required to determine the role that rivers play in the global N₂O budget. The objectives of this research were to measure the N₂O fluxes from a spring‐fed river, relate these fluxes to the dissolved N₂O concentrations and NO₃‐N loading of the river, and to try and define the indirect emission factor (EF5‐r) for the river. Gas bubble ebullition was observed at the river source with bubbles containing 7.9 μL N₂O L^?1. River NO₃‐N and dissolved N₂O concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 mg L^?1 and 0.4 to 1.9 μg N₂O‐N L^?1, respectively, with N₂O saturation reaching 404%. Floating headspace chambers were used to sample N₂O fluxes. N₂O‐N fluxes were significantly related to dissolved N₂O‐N concentrations (r²=30.6) but not to NO₃‐N concentrations. The N₂O‐N fluxes ranged from 38–501 μg m^?2 h^?1, averaging 171 μg m^?2 h^?1 (±SD 85) overall. The measured N₂O‐N fluxes equated to an EF5‐r of only 6.6% of that calculated using the IPCC methodology, and this itself was considered to be an overestimate because of the degassing of antecedent dissolved N₂O present in the groundwater that fed the river.     

Diel changes of uptake of inorganic carbon and nitrogen by phytoplankton, and the relationship between inorganic carbon and nitrogen uptake in Lake Nakanuma, Japan

Diel changes of uptake of inorganic carbon and nitrogen wereexamined in a small freshwater lake, Lake Nakanuma, Japan, bythe ¹³C and ¹⁵N method. Experiments were earned out in spring,summer and autumn in 1984. Carbon and nitrogen uptake in thelight incubation showed maxima around noon at the three seasons.Carbon uptake ceased at night, but ammonium uptake was fairlylarge at night. In the dark incubation carbon uptake did notoccur. Ammonium uptake showed a maximum at dusk in the darkexperiments. Diel changes of nitrate uptake were less clearthan those of ammonium uptake. These results indicate that nitrogenuptake partly depended on the carbon uptake. Then, we triedto explain the diel changes of nitrogen uptake, assuming thatthe nitrogen uptake partly depends on stored carbohydrate. Thediel changes may be elucidated by the sum of three terms: oneis the term of decay of stored carbohydrate, the second is theterm which indicates cumulative increase of stored carbohydrateand the third is the term which directly depends on light.     

Estimating annual N2O emissions from agricultural soils in temperate climates

The Kyoto protocol requires countries to provide national inventories for a list of greenhouse gases including N₂O. A standard methodology proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates direct N₂O emissions from soils as a constant fraction (1.25%) of the nitrogen input. This approach is insensitive to environmental variability. A more dynamic approach is needed to establish reliable N₂O emission inventories and to propose efficient mitigation strategies. The objective of this paper is to develop a model that allows the spatial and temporal variation in environmental conditions to be taken into account in national inventories of direct N₂O emissions. Observed annual N₂O emission rates are used to establish statistical relationships between N₂O emissions, seasonal climate and nitrogen‐fertilization rate. Two empirical models, MCROPS and MGRASS, were developed for croplands and grasslands. Validated with an independent data set, MCROPS shows that spring temperature and summer precipitation explain 35% of the variance in annual N₂O emissions from croplands. In MGRASS, nitrogen‐fertilization rate and winter temperature explain 48% of the variance in annual N₂O emissions from grasslands. Using long‐term climate observations (1900–2000), the sensitivity of the models with climate variability is estimated by comparing the year‐to‐year prediction of the model to the precision obtained during the validation process. MCROPS is able to capture interannual variability of N₂O emissions from croplands. However, grassland emissions show very small interannual variations, which are too small to be detectable by MGRASS. MCROPS and MGRASS improve the statistical reliability of direct N₂O emissions compared with the IPCC default methodology. Furthermore, the models can be used to estimate the effects of interannual variation in climate, climate change on direct N₂O emissions from soils at the regional scale.     

Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions

Streams and river networks are increasingly recognized as significant sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O). N₂O is a transformation product of nitrogenous compounds in soil, sediment and water. Agricultural areas are considered a particular hotspot for emissions because of the large input of nitrogen (N) fertilizers applied on arable land. However, there is little information on N₂O emissions from forest streams although they constitute a major part of the total stream network globally. Here, we compiled N₂O concentration data from low‐order streams (~1,000 observations from 172 stream sites) covering a large geographical gradient in Sweden from the temperate to the boreal zone and representing catchments with various degrees of agriculture and forest coverage. Our results showed that agricultural and forest streams had comparable N₂O concentrations of 1.6 ± 2.1 and 1.3 ± 1.8 µg N/L, respectively (mean ± SD) despite higher total N (TN) concentrations in agricultural streams (1,520 ± 1,640 vs. 780 ± 600 µg N/L). Although clear patterns linking N₂O concentrations and environmental variables were difficult to discern, the percent saturation of N₂O in the streams was positively correlated with stream concentration of TN and negatively correlated with pH. We speculate that the apparent contradiction between lower TN concentration but similar N₂O concentrations in forest streams than in agricultural streams is due to the low pH (<6) in forest soils and streams which affects denitrification and yields higher N₂O emissions. An estimate of the N₂O emission from low‐order streams at the national scale revealed that ~1.8 × 10⁹ g N₂O‐N are emitted annually in Sweden, with forest streams contributing about 80% of the total stream emission. Hence, our results provide evidence that forest streams can act as substantial N₂O sources in the landscape with 800 × 10⁹ g CO₂‐eq emitted annually in Sweden, equivalent to 25% of the total N₂O emissions from the Swedish agricultural sector.     

Spatially explicit estimates of N2O emissions from croplands suggest climate mitigation opportunities from improved fertilizer management

With increasing nitrogen (N) application to croplands required to support growing food demand, mitigating N₂O emissions from agricultural soils is a global challenge. National greenhouse gas emissions accounting typically estimates N₂O emissions at the country scale by aggregating all crops, under the assumption that N₂O emissions are linearly related to N application. However, field studies and meta‐analyses indicate a nonlinear relationship, in which N₂O emissions are relatively greater at higher N application rates. Here, we apply a super‐linear emissions response model to crop‐specific, spatially explicit synthetic N fertilizer and manure N inputs to provide subnational accounting of global N₂O emissions from croplands. We estimate 0.66 Tg of N₂O‐N direct global emissions circa 2000, with 50% of emissions concentrated in 13% of harvested area. Compared to estimates from the IPCC Tier 1 linear model, our updated N₂O emissions range from 20% to 40% lower throughout sub‐Saharan Africa and Eastern Europe, to >120% greater in some Western European countries. At low N application rates, the weak nonlinear response of N₂O emissions suggests that relatively large increases in N fertilizer application would generate relatively small increases in N₂O emissions. As aggregated fertilizer data generate underestimation bias in nonlinear models, high‐resolution N application data are critical to support accurate N₂O emissions estimates.     

Direct N2O emission factors for synthetic N‐fertilizer and organic residues applied on sugarcane for bioethanol production in Central‐Southern Brazil

The production and use of biofuels have increased rapidly in recent decades. Bioethanol derived from sugarcane has become a promising alternative to fossil fuel for use in automotive vehicles. The ‘savings’ calculated from the carbon footprint of this energy source still generates many questions related to nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from sugarcane cultivation. We quantified N₂O emissions from soil covered with different amounts of sugarcane straw and determined the direct N₂O emission factors of nitrogen fertilizers (applied at the planting furrows and in the topdressing) and the by‐products of sugarcane processing (filter cake and vinasse) applied to sugarcane fields. The results showed that the presence of different amounts of sugarcane straw did not change N₂O emissions relative to bare soil (control). N‐fertilizer increased N₂O emissions from the soil, especially when urea was used, both at the planting furrow (plant cane) and during the regrowth process (ratoon cane) in relation to ammonium nitrate. The emission factor for N‐fertilizer was 0.46 ± 0.33%. The field application of filter cake and vinasse favored N₂O emissions from the soil, the emission factor for vinasse was 0.65 ± 0.29%, while filter cake had a lower emission factor of 0.13 ± 0.04%. The experimentally obtained N₂O emission factors associated with sugarcane cultivation, specific to the major sugarcane production region of the Brazil, were lower than those considered by the IPCC. Thus, the results of this study should contribute to bioethanol carbon footprint calculations.     

Climate- and crop-responsive emission factors significantly alter estimates of current and future nitrous oxide emissions from fertilizer use

The current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default methodology (tier 1) for calculating nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from nitrogen applied to agricultural soils takes no account of either crop type or climatic conditions. As a result, the methodology omits factors that are crucial in determining current emissions, and has no mechanism to assess the potential impact of future climate and land‐use change. Scotland is used as a case study to illustrate the development of a new methodology, which retains the simple structure of the IPCC tier 1 methodology, but incorporates crop‐ and climate‐dependent emission factors (EFs). It also includes a factor to account for the effect of soil compaction because of trampling by grazing animals. These factors are based on recent field studies in Scotland and elsewhere in the UK. Under current conditions, the new methodology produces significantly higher estimates of annual N₂O emissions than the IPCC default methodology, almost entirely because of the increased contribution of grazed pasture. Total emissions from applied fertilizer and N deposited by grazing animals are estimated at 10 662 t N₂O‐N yr^?1 using the newly derived EFs, as opposed to 6 796 t N₂O‐N yr^?1 using the IPCC default EFs. On a spatial basis, emission levels are closer to those calculated using field observations and detailed soil modelling than to estimates made using the IPCC default methodology. This can be illustrated by parts of the western Ayrshire basin, which have previously been calculated to emit 8–9 kg N₂O‐N ha^?1 yr^?1 and are estimated here as 6.25–8.75 kg N₂O‐N ha^?1 yr^?1, while the IPCC default methodology gives a maximum emission level of only 3.75 kg N₂O‐N ha^?1 yr^?1 for the whole area. The new methodology is also applied in conjunction with scenarios for future climate‐ and land‐use patterns, to assess how these emissions may change in the future. The results suggest that by 2080, Scottish N₂O emissions may increase by up to 14%, depending on the climate scenario, if fertilizer and land management practices remain unchanged. Reductions in agricultural land use, however, have the potential to mitigate these increases and, depending on the replacement land use, may even reduce emissions to below current levels.     

Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural drainage waters

Uncertainty about the amounts of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O), which arise from N leaching from agricultural soils, predominantly as nitrate (NO₃^–), is large. To date, the bulk of studies of N₂O in aquatic systems have relied upon measurement of dissolved N₂O concentrations at wide spatial intervals (of the order of km) down a stream, river or estuary. When we combined a fine‐scale (m) assessment of N₂O concentrations in agricultural drainage water with novel measurement of net N₂O emission from the same drainage system, we found that dissolved N₂O in agricultural drainage water was very rapidly lost to the atmosphere, while dissolved NO₃^– in the same water was conserved. Consequently, the N₂O emission factor (as a proportion of the nitrate‐N present, the IPCC's ‘EF₅’) fell by a factor of more than 5 within only 100 m. Direct measurement of N₂O emission from the drainage water confirmed the disappearance of N₂O as being due to emission from water to the atmosphere, rather than in situ consumption by denitrification. Our findings indicate that making widely spaced measurements of dissolved N₂O concentration and/or emissions from the water surface will not take account of this much more dynamic behaviour over short distances. Realistic assessment of the ‘indirect’ agricultural emissions of N₂O from leached N will necessitate much more intensive sampling of the whole drainage system, from ditch to stream to river to estuary, accompanied by measurements of in‐stream production. The quantities of N₂O actually released in the ditches gave values for EF_5‐g (the IPCC's emission factor for N₂O from surface drainage and groundwaters) of between 0.02 and 0.03%, compared with the IPCC value of 1.5%. For the latter to be realistic, the quantity of N₂O required to be formed after the initial entry of water into the drainage system would need to exceed the initial load by the order of 50‐fold.     

Denitrification rate determined by nitrate disappearance is higher than determined by nitrous oxide production with acetylene blockage

A mixed beech and spruce forest soil was incubated under potential denitrification assay (PDA) condition with 10% acetylene (C₂H₂) in the headspace of soil slurry bottles. Nitrous oxide (N₂O) concentration in the headspace, as well as nitrate, nitrite and ammonium concentrations in the soil slurries were monitored during the incubation. Results show that nitrate disappearance rate was higher than N₂O production rate with C₂H₂ blockage during the incubation. Sum of nitrate, nitrite, and N₂O with C₂H₂ blockage could not recover the original soil nitrate content, showing an N imbalance in such a closed incubation system. Changes in nitrite and ammonium concentration during the incubation could not account for the observed faster nitrate disappearance rate and the N imbalance. Non-determined nitric oxide (NO) and N₂ production could be the major cause, and the associated mechanisms could vary for different treatments. Commonly applied PDA measurement likely underestimates the nitrate removal capacity of a system. Incubation time and organic matter/nitrate ratio are the most critical factors to consider using C₂H₂ inhibition technique to quantify denitrification. By comparing the treatments with and without an antibiotic, the results suggest that microbial N uptake probably played a minor role in N balance, and other denitrifying enzymes but nitrate reductase could be substantially synthesized during the incubation.     

Soil nitrous oxide emissions from a typical semiarid temperate steppe in inner Mongolia: effects of mineral nitrogen fertilizer levels and forms

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions can be significantly affected by the amounts and forms of nitrogen (N) available in soils, but the effect is highly dependent on local climate and soil conditions in specific ecosystem. To improve our understanding of the response of N₂O emissions to different N sources of fertilizer in a typical semiarid temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia, a 2-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of high, medium and low N fertilizer levels (HN: 200 kg N?ha^-1y^-1, MN: 100 kg N ha^-1y^-1, and LN: 50 kg N ha^-1y^-1) respectively and N fertilizer forms (CAN: calcium ammonium nitrate, AS: ammonium sulphate and NS: sodium nitrate) on N₂O emissions using static closed chamber method. Our data showed that peak N₂O fluxes induced by N treatments were concentrated in short periods (2 to 3 weeks) after fertilization in summer and in soil thawing periods in early spring; there were similarly low N₂O fluxes from all treatments in the remaining seasons of the year. The three N levels increased annual N₂O emissions significantly (P?<?0.05) in the order of MN > HN > LN compared with the CK (control) treatment in year 1; in year 2, the elevation of annual N₂O emissions was significant (P?<?0.05) by HN and MN treatments but was insignificant by LN treatments (P?>?0.05). The three N forms also had strong effects on N₂O emissions. Significantly (P?<?0.05) higher annual N₂O emissions were observed in the soils of CAN and AS fertilizer treatments than in the soils of NS fertilizer treatments in both measured years, but the difference between CAN and AS was not significant (P?>?0.05). Annual N₂O emission factors (EF) ranged from 0.060 to 0.298% for different N fertilizer treatments in the two observed years, with an overall EF value of 0.125%. The EF values were by far less than the mean default EF proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).     

Nitrous oxide fluxes from a grain–legume crop (narrow‐leafed lupin) grown in a semiarid climate

Understanding nitrous oxide (N₂O) fluxes from grain–legume crops in semiarid and arid regions is necessary if we are to improve our knowledge of global terrestrial N₂O losses resulting from biological N₂ fixation. N₂O fluxes were measured from a rain‐fed soil, cropped to a grain–legume in a semiarid region of southwestern Australia for 1 year on a subdaily basis. The site included plots planted to narrow‐leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius; ‘lupin’) and plots left bare (no lupin). Fluxes were measured using soil chambers connected to a fully automated system that measured N₂O by gas chromatography. Daily N₂O fluxes were low (?0.5 to 24 g N₂O‐N ha^?1 day^?1) and not different between treatments, culminating in an annual loss of 127 g N₂O‐N ha^?1. Greatest daily N₂O fluxes occurred from both treatments in the postharvest period, and following a series of summer and autumn rainfall events. At this time of the year, soil conditions were conducive to soil microbial N₂O production: elevated soil water contents, increased inorganic nitrogen (N) and dissolved organic carbon concentrations, and soil temperatures generally > 25 °C; furthermore, there was no active plant growth to compete for mineralized N. N₂O emissions from the decomposition of legume crop residue were low, and approximately half that predicted using the currently recommended IPCC methodology. Furthermore, the contribution of the biological N₂ fixation process to N₂O emissions appeared negligible in the present study, supporting its omission as a source of N₂O from the IPCC methodology for preparing national greenhouse gas inventories.     

Nonlinear response of N2O flux to incremental fertilizer addition in a continuous maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system

The relationship between nitrous oxide (N₂O) flux and N availability in agricultural ecosystems is usually assumed to be linear, with the same proportion of nitrogen lost as N₂O regardless of input level. We conducted a 3‐year, high‐resolution N fertilizer response study in southwest Michigan USA to test the hypothesis that N₂O fluxes increase mainly in response to N additions that exceed crop N needs. We added urea ammonium nitrate or granular urea at nine levels (0–292 kg N ha^?1) to four replicate plots of continuous maize. We measured N₂O fluxes and available soil N biweekly following fertilization and grain yields at the end of the growing season. From 2001 to 2003 N₂O fluxes were moderately low (ca. 20 g N₂O‐N ha^?1 day^?1) at levels of N addition to 101 kg N ha^?1, where grain yields were maximized, after which fluxes more than doubled (to >50 g N₂O‐N ha^?1 day^?1). This threshold N₂O response to N fertilization suggests that agricultural N₂O fluxes could be reduced with no or little yield penalty by reducing N fertilizer inputs to levels that just satisfy crop needs.     

Lakes as nitrous oxide sources in the boreal landscape

Estimates of regional and global freshwater N₂O emissions have remained inaccurate due to scarce data and complexity of the multiple processes driving N₂O fluxes the focus predominantly being on summer time measurements from emission hot spots, agricultural streams. Here, we present four‐season data of N₂O concentrations in the water columns of randomly selected boreal lakes covering a large variation in latitude, lake type, area, depth, water chemistry, and land use cover. Nitrate was the key driver for N₂O dynamics, explaining as much as 78% of the variation of the seasonal mean N₂O concentrations across all lakes. Nitrate concentrations varied among seasons being highest in winter and lowest in summer. Of the surface water samples, 71% were oversaturated with N₂O relative to the atmosphere. Largest oversaturation was measured in winter and lowest in summer stressing the importance to include full year N₂O measurements in annual emission estimates. Including winter data resulted in fourfold annual N₂O emission estimates compared to summer only measurements. Nutrient‐rich calcareous and large humic lakes had the highest annual N₂O emissions. Our emission estimates for Finnish and boreal lakes are 0.6 and 29 Gg N₂O‐N/year, respectively. The global warming potential of N₂O from lakes cannot be neglected in the boreal landscape, being 35% of that of diffusive CH₄ emission in Finnish lakes.     

A Non-Native Riparian Tree (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Elaeagnus angustifolia</Emphasis>) Changes Nutrient Dynamics in Streams

Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) is a non-native riparian tree that has become common and continues to rapidly spread throughout the western United States. Due to its dinitrogen (N₂)-fixing ability and proximity to streams, Russian olive has the potential to subsidize stream ecosystems with nitrogen (N), which may in turn alter nutrient processing in these systems. We tested these potential effects by comparing background N concentrations; nutrient limitation of biofilms; and uptake of ammonium (NH₄-N), nitrate (NO₃-N), and phosphate (PO₄-P) in paired upstream-reference and downstream-invaded reaches in streams in southeastern Idaho and central Wyoming. We found that stream reaches invaded by Russian olive had higher organic N concentrations and exhibited reduced N limitation of biofilms compared to reference reaches. However, at low inorganic N background concentrations, reaches invaded by Russian olive exhibited higher demand for both NH₄-N and NO₃-N compared to their paired reference reaches, suggesting these streams have the potential to retain the N subsidy from Russian olive N₂ fixation and diminish its downstream export and effects. Our findings demonstrate the potential for a non-native riparian plant to significantly alter biogeochemical cycling in streams. Finally, we used our results to develop a conceptual model that describes predicted effects of Russian olive and other non-native riparian N₂ fixers on in-stream N dynamics.     

DenNit – Experimental analysis and modelling of soil N2O efflux in response on changes of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH, nutrient availability and the time after rain event

To quantify the effects of soil temperature (T_soil), and relative soil water content (RSWC) on soil N₂O emission we measured N₂O soil efflux with a closed dynamic chamber in situ in the field and from soil cores in a controlled climate chamber experiment. Additionally we analysed the effect of soil acidity, ammonium, and nitrate concentration in the field. The analysis was performed on three meadows, two bare soils and in one forest. We identified soil water content, soil temperature, soil nitrogen content, and pH as the main parameters influencing soil N₂O emission. The response of N₂O emission to soil temperature and relative soil water content was analysed for the field and climate chamber measurements. A non-linear regression model (DenNit) was developed for the field data to describe soil N₂O efflux as a function of soil temperature, soil moisture, pH value, and ammonium and nitrate concentration. The model could explain 81% of the variability in soil N₂O emission of all individual field measurements, except for data with short-term soil water changes, namely during and up to 2 h after rain stopped. We validated the model with an independent dataset. For this additional meadow site 73% of the flux variation could be explained with the model.     

Indirect N2O emissions from shallow groundwater in an agricultural catchment (Seine Basin, France)

Production and accumulation of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a major greenhouse gas, in shallow groundwater might contribute to indirect N₂O emissions to the atmosphere (e.g., when groundwater flows into a stream or a river). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has attributed an emission factor (EF_5g) for N₂O, associated with nitrate leaching in groundwater and drainage ditches—0.0025 (corresponding to 0.25% of N leached which is emitted as N₂O)—although this is the subject of considerable uncertainty. We investigated and quantified the transport and fate of nitrate (NO₃ ^?) and dissolved nitrous oxide from crop fields to groundwater and surface water over a 2-year period (monitoring from April 2008 to April 2010) in a transect from a plateau to the river with three piezometers. In groundwater, nitrate concentrations ranged from 1.0 to 22.7 mg NO₃ ^?–N l^?1 (from 2.8 to 37.5 mg NO₃ ^?–N l^?1 in the river) and dissolved N₂O from 0.2 to 101.0 μg N₂O–N l^?1 (and from 0.2 to 2.9 μg N₂O–N l^?1 in the river). From these measurements, we estimated an emission factor of EF_5g = 0.0026 (similar to the value currently used by the IPCC) and an annual indirect N₂O flux from groundwater of 0.035 kg N₂O–N ha^?1 year^?1, i.e., 1.8% of the previously measured direct N₂O flux from agricultural soils.     

Stream metabolism controls diel patterns and evasion of CO2 in Arctic streams

Streams play an important role in the global carbon (C) cycle, accounting for a large portion of CO₂ evaded from inland waters despite their small areal coverage. However, the relative importance of different terrestrial and aquatic processes driving CO₂ production and evasion from streams remains poorly understood. In this study, we measured O₂ and CO₂ continuously in streams draining tundra‐dominated catchments in northern Sweden, during the summers of 2015 and 2016. From this, we estimated daily metabolic rates and CO₂ evasion simultaneously and thus provide insight into the role of stream metabolism as a driver of C dynamics in Arctic streams. Our results show that aquatic biological processes regulate CO₂ concentrations and evasion at multiple timescales. Photosynthesis caused CO₂ concentrations to decrease by as much as 900 ppm during the day, with the magnitude of this diel variation being strongest at the low‐turbulence streams. Diel patterns in CO₂ concentrations in turn influenced evasion, with up to 45% higher rates at night. Throughout the summer, CO₂ evasion was sustained by aquatic ecosystem respiration, which was one order of magnitude higher than gross primary production. Furthermore, in most cases, the contribution of stream respiration exceeded CO₂ evasion, suggesting that some stream reaches serve as net sources of CO₂, thus creating longitudinal heterogeneity in C production and loss within this stream network. Overall, our results provide the first link between stream metabolism and CO₂ evasion in the Arctic and demonstrate that stream metabolic processes are key drivers of the transformation and fate of terrestrial organic matter exported from these landscapes.