The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology

A. Talaat, D. Brinkmann, J. Dhundee, Y. Hana, J. Bevan, R. Irvine, S. Bailey and R. Woolas
Risk of significant gynaecological pathology in women with ?glandular neoplasia on cervical cytology Objective: To review the risk of pre‐invasive and invasive gynaecological pathology in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. Methods: Review of the case notes of all women referred with cervical cytology reported as ?glandular neoplasia between January 1999 and December 2008 at two UK hospitals: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and Queen Mary’s Hospital Sidcup. The category of ‘borderline nuclear change in endocervical cells’, result code 8 according to the national health service cancer screening programme (NHSCSP), was excluded from the study. Results: A total of 200 women were identified using the hospitals’ pathology computer systems. Invasive carcinoma was found in 48 women (24%): 28 endocervical adenocarcinomas, eight squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), ten endometrial and two ovarian adenocarcinomas. Pre‐invasive neoplasia was found in 115 (57.5%), including 14 cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN), 31 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 and 70 concomitant CGIN and CIN2/3. CIN1/HPV was found in 25, simple endometrial hyperplasia in three and no histological abnormality in three. Thirty‐four (70.8%) of 48 invasive carcinomas (of which 23 were endocervical adenocarcinomas) were in asymptomatic women investigated for abnormal cytology. Fourteen of 34 (41.4%) of those with ?glandular neoplasia thought to be endometrial were CGIN or CIN2/3. Colposcopic appearances were normal in 47.6% of women with pure cervical glandular neoplasia (adenocarcinoma or CGIN) compared with 12.8% with squamous cell lesions (CIN2/3 or SCC): P = 0.0001. Thus, colposcopy was more sensitive for detecting squamous cell abnormalities than their glandular counterparts. Although cervical adenocarcinomas are less amenable to prevention by screening than cervical SCC, in our study cervical cytology predominantly detected these abnormalities at their early asymptomatic stages. Conclusion: At least CIN2 was found in 81.5% in women referred with cervical cytology reporting ?glandular neoplasia. A thorough evaluation of the whole genital tract is needed if colposcopy is negative.     

Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens

Objective: To identify in cytology, high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with endocervical glandular extension in cases previously diagnosed as atypical glandular cells (AGC), analyse possible reasons for the diagnostic pitfall and document the frequency of glandular pathology coexisting with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial lesion in histology. Methods: Thirty‐nine ThinPrep® cervical smear (Pap) tests reported as AGC of undetermined significance and showing high‐grade lesions on histology [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, endometrial or extrauterine adenocarcinoma] were reviewed retrospectively to identify the cases of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical glandular extension, using the Bethesda 2001 system. Cyto‐histological correlation was performed. Results: A high frequency of diverse glandular pathologies coexisted with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial lesions on histology. This included endocervical glandular extension in 63%, benign glandular pathology in 33% and pre‐neoplastic or malignant glandular pathology (endocervical glandular dysplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ and metastatic breast carcinoma) in 17% cases. On cytology, the sensitivity was 40%, specificity was 80% and positive predictive value was 86% for endocervical gland extension in high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Conclusions: Special efforts to recognize endocervical glandular extension in high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and glandular neoplasia coexisting with squamous intraepithelial lesions from the heterogeneous category of AGC can contribute to increasing the diagnostic accuracy. The identification of endocervical glandular extension on cervical cytology would alert the gynaecologist to perform a thorough assessment of the endocervix during colposcopy. This could also help to decide on the need to perform deeper conization rather than loop electrosurgical excision procedure to ensure negative margins when colposcopic biopsy shows CIN 2 or 3.     

A retrospective clinical audit of cervical smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia'.

The aims of this study were to review the diagnostic pathway of women with smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia' and to outline the management, colposcopy findings, treatment and final histological diagnosis in these women. The design was a retrospective review. A total of 114 women were identified over a 5-year period from the cytology database at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Cytology Department, whose hospital case notes were available for review. Methods included a review of the case notes for the demographic details, indication for smear, colposcopic findings, investigation and/or treatment procedures, histology, final diagnosis and current disease status. Of 114 smears reported as 'glandular neoplasia', 67 were reported as consistent with cervical glandular intra-epithelial neoplasia (CGIN), six with endocervical adenocarcinoma, 36 with endometrial adenocarcinoma and five with other glandular neoplastic abnormalities. The average age was 46.5 years. 79 (69.3%) smears were routine call/recall and 36 (30.7%) women were symptomatic. The positive predictive value (PPV) for a significant histological abnormality in the CGIN smear group was 80.6% (23.9% invasive carcinomas, 43.3% CGIN and 13.4% CIN) and the PPV of an 'endometrial adenocarcinoma' smear was 86.1%. Smears indicating glandular neoplasia are associated with a high probability of clinically significant lesions, the PPV of a CGIN smear being over 80%. Immediate referral for colposcopy and assessment by an experienced colposcopist is recommended.     

Borderline nuclear change,high‐grade dyskaryosis not excluded: current concepts and impact on clinical practice

S. S. Hoo, A. Patel, H. Buist, K. Galaal, J. D. Hemming and R. Naik Borderline nuclear change, high‐grade dyskaryosis not excluded: current concepts and impact on clinical practice Objective: Borderline nuclear change, high‐grade dyskaryosis not excluded (B/HG) is a subcategory of the borderline category recommended by the British Society for Clinical Cytology as warranting direct referral to colposcopy. This subcategory is equivalent to the Bethesda category of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC‐H). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and accuracy of using B/HG to identify potential cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). Methods: Data were collected from the hospital pathology database for borderline, B/HG and high‐grade cytology (moderate dyskaryosis and above), and their respective histological and colposcopic outcomes. SPSS was used for data analysis. Results: Of the 84 799 total cytology samples screened between July 2006 and December 2009, 5225 (6.1%) were reported as borderline, 309 (0.4%) as B/HG and 1222 (1.4%) as high‐grade cytology. Thus, B/HG comprised 5.9% of the overall borderline category, in keeping with national guidelines (<10%). CIN2+ was confirmed in 86.6% of high‐grade, 40.8% of B/HG and 3.0% of borderline cytology. Of 309 women reported with B/HG cytology, 239 had colposcopy. Colposcopic appearances showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.8% for detecting CIN2+ and a negative predictive value of 60.7%. Conclusions: The B/HG category was associated with a significantly higher incidence of CIN2+ compared with borderline cytology as a whole. This refining performance justifies its existence. Colposcopic appearances had a high PPV for detecting CIN2+. Therefore, colposcopy is recommended in patients with B/HG cytology and treatment should be offered if high‐grade colposcopic changes are seen.     

Outcomes of cervical liquid-based cytology suggesting a glandular abnormality

Objective: To ascertain the positive predictive value of both ?glandular neoplasia (national standard code 6) and borderline change (national standard code 8) in glandular cells in liquid‐based cervical cytology specimens in Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust and to outline the histological outcomes of these cases. Method: Eighty‐nine liquid‐based (Surepath?) cervical cytology cases were retrospectively identified from a 2‐year period (January 2005 to December 2006) and correlated with histopathological diagnoses. Results: Initial punch biopsy histology revealed 18 cases (21%) of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN). A further nine cases (10%) of CGIN were identified following local excision or hysterectomy. Ten cases of invasive malignancy were identified: four endocervical adenocarcinomas (all node negative, TNM stage T1b1), five endometrial adenocarcinomas and one squamous cell carcinoma. There were 10 with high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) alone. Women diagnosed with endometrial malignancy presented later with an average age of 64.6 years compared with 34.9 years for endocervical lesions. Taking high‐grade CIN or worse as a positive outcome, the overall positive predictive value (PPV) of glandular abnormalities on cytology (both code 6 and 8) was 58.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8, 68.4]. PPV for borderline change in glandular cells alone was 24.1% (95% CI 8.5, 39.6) and for ?glandular neoplasia alone 75.4% (95% CI 64.3, 86.5). Conclusion: With our interpretation of the classification, women with cytological diagnoses of glandular neoplasia of the cervix should initially be investigated by local resection rather than punch biopsy, and those with borderline change in glandular cells with repeat cytology.     

An audit of liquid‐based cervical cytology screening samples (ThinPrep and SurePath) reported as glandular neoplasia

S. A. Thiryayi, J. Marshall and D. N. Rana
An audit of liquid‐based cervical cytology screening samples (ThinPrep and SurePath) reported as glandular neoplasia Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the number of cases diagnosed as glandular neoplasia (national report code 6) of cervical (6A) and non‐cervical (6B) types on ThinPrep (TP) and SurePath (SP) liquid‐based cytology (LBC) samples and to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of these diagnoses for significant glandular and/or squamous pathology for local audit and as a contribution to national data on glandular neoplasia. Methods: A computerized search identified all screening LBC samples reported as glandular neoplasia during the 24‐month period from January 2006 to December 2007. Corresponding histology samples were identified, with a minimum follow‐up period of 6 months for each case. Results: A total of 70 samples, representing 70 patients, were reported as glandular neoplasia, 39 TP (55.7%) and 31 SP (44.3%), with 46 samples (31 TP, 15 SP) reported as 6A and 24 samples (eight TP, 16 SP) as 6B. PPV of glandular neoplasia was calculated for a biopsy diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia/adenocarcinoma and/or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse. The PPV of 6A was 100% for both TP and SP. The PPV of 6B for adenocarcinoma was 62.5% for TP and 66.7% for SP. The combined PPV for 6A + 6B was 92.3% for TP, 83.3% for SP and 88.4% combined. The overall pick‐up rates for the two methods were significantly different (TP 0.031%, SP 0.052%; P = 0.014). Histology showed only CIN3 with endocervical crypt involvement in nine TP cases and one SP case.     

Increased diagnostic accuracy of atypical glandular cells in cervical liquid‐based cytology using cell blocks

E. K. J. Risse, J. P. Holierhoek, E. M. Meijer‐Marres, E. Ouwerkerk‐Noordam and M. E. Boon Increased diagnostic accuracy of atypical glandular cells in cervical liquid‐based cytology using cell blocks Objective: The purpose of this study was to reduce the number of diagnoses of atypical glandular cells (AGC). Residual material from the cervical ThinPrep® samples (Hologic, Marlboruogh, MA, USA) was used for cell blocks (CB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: In 2007 there were 87 patients (0.12% of tests) with AGC on liquid‐based cytology (LBC) in the Leiden Cytology and Pathology Laboratory (LCPL) using the Bethesda System 2001 (TBS). CB with IHC was used for 26 of these cases. The vials still containing the brush (Cervex‐Brush^® Combi) were placed in a shaker for 10 minutes to dislodge the material trapped between the bristles. The residual sampling fluid was used to prepare paraffin sections (Shandon Cytoblock^®) stained with Papanicolaou and immunostaining. Results: Four of five cases with AGC not otherwise specified (NOS) were diagnosed with CB/IHC as benign mimics (endometrium, tubal metaplasia, follicular cervicitis, microglandular hyperplasia) and one of four with AGC‐favour neoplasia (FN) (endocervical polyp). In one of five cases with AGC‐NOS and in two of seven with AGC‐FN, CIN3 was found on subsequent histological biopsy. Of six cases diagnosed as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) on LBC with CB/IHC the diagnosis was confirmed in four; one was adenocarcinoma and one glandular atypia. Of eight cases diagnosed as adenocarcinoma on cytology and CB/IHC, the diagnosis was confirmed in three. The other five cases were found to be one each of AIS, squamous cell carcinoma, CIN3, CIN2 with glandular atypia, and cervical endometriosis. Conclusions: By reducing the number of benign mimics of AGC, we achieved a high proportion (16/26; 61.5%) of neoplastic or preneoplastic lesions (glandular or squamous) on histological outcome potentially avoiding colposcopy. Histological biopsy verification by the gynaecologist is needed for final diagnosis of AGC‐FN, AIS and adenocarcinoma.     

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk

In a 3-year study of the population of Southampton and south-west Hampshire there were 10 times as many cases of CIN III compared with invasive squamous carcinoma (700 compared with 70). The peak incidence of CIN III per 1000 screened women years was in those aged 25-29 years, which was 20 years earlier than the peak incidence of invasive cervical cancer per 1000 women years at risk. Ninety percent of CIN III was diagnosed in women under 50 years. There were 14 cases of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CGIN III), three coexisting with CIN III, all in women aged under 50 years: the gap between intraepithelial and invasive lesions was not seen for glandular neoplasia. Although referral was for at least moderate dyskaryosis in 86.8% of women with CIN III or CGIN III, most had been screened previously, either having had mild abnormalities requiring repeat cytology (39.8%) or negative cytology (34.5%). Only 12 women aged > or = 50 years had previous negative cytology: 21.4% compared with 35.6% of women aged < 50 years (P = 0.034). The results of this study suggest that the best opportunity for preventing invasive squamous cell carcinoma lies in screening women aged 20-39 years when the incidence of CIN III in the screened population is highest and before the peak incidence of invasive disease. The results also indicate the importance of repeated screening and follow up of minor cytological abnormalities in the detection of CIN III. The benefit of screening must be regarded as a treatment of risk, since it is almost certain that a high proportion of CIN III regresses or persists unchanged.     

A study to determine the underlying reason for abnormal glandular cytology and the formulation of a management protocol

A retrospective review is presented of 89 patients with glandular dyskaryosis in order to formulate a management protocol. Fifteen patients had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) without glandular abnormality (17%). One patient had adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix and one patient had vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) grade III. Twenty‐two patients had endometrial carcinoma (24.5%) and 11 patients had cervical carcinoma (12.5%). Of the patients presenting with post‐menopausal bleeding as well as having glandular dyskaryosis, 69% had a gynaecological malignancy. In conclusion, colposcopy and out‐patient endometrial sampling are recommended in all cases. Patients with abnormal endometrial sampling require hysteroscopy. Cone biopsy is necessary to exclude occult glandular disease if cytology remains abnormal despite negative colposcopy and sampling.     

Outcomes of pregnant patients with Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells

J. Slama, P. Freitag, P. Dundr, J. Duskova, D. Fischerova, M. Zikan, I. Pinkavova and D. Cibula
Outcomes of pregnant patients with Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells Objectives: The incidence of cervical cancers increases with age. Due to the trend of increasing age of first pregnancy, abnormal Pap smears including those classified as atypical glandular cells (AGC) are being found more often in early pregnancy. Once invasive cancer is excluded, conservative management of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) in pregnancy is considered safe; however, optimal management of AGC is not well established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AGC diagnosed from smears during pregnancy. Methods: The study included 17 patients referred to us in early pregnancy with Pap smears reported as AGC: 11 not otherwise specified (AGC‐NOS), five favour neoplasia (AGC‐FN) and one adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Thirty‐one with high‐grade SIL (HSIL) Pap smears confirmed on punch biopsy in early pregnancy comprised a control group. Human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity was found in seven patients with persistent AGC‐NOS (including all four who had CIN3 postpartum). All the women were initially examined by expert colposcopy and those with AGC‐FN or AIS smears also by transrectal ultrasound to exclude invasive endocervical cancer. Follow‐up controls were carried out every 8–12 weeks and, if there were no signs of progression, revaluation was scheduled 6–8 weeks after delivery. Results: The mean age of the women was 31.4 years. Conization in one patient in the study group was performed in the 16th week of pregnancy due to colposcopic signs of microinvasive squamous cell cancer confirmed on histology. Progression to invasive cancer was not found in any of the other 16 patients in the study group or in the control group. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or AIS was confirmed postpartum by conization or punch biopsy in 47.1% (8/17) of patients in the study group and, in 77.4% (24/31) of patients in the control group. Conclusions: Conservative management of women with AGC in pregnancy is safe where invasive cancer is excluded. As histological verification of glandular pre‐cancerous lesions by punch biopsy is not reliable and the postpartum regression rate cannot be determined precisely, conization should be performed in all cases with AGC‐FN or AIS. Triage of persistent AGC‐NOS with HPV testing is useful in distinguishing significant underlying lesions.     

European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1

The current paper presents the first part of Chapter 6 of the second edition of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. It provides guidance on how to manage women with abnormal cervical cytology. Throughout this article the Bethesda system is used for cervical cytology terminology, as the European guidelines have recommended that all systems should at least be translated into that terminology while cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is used for histological biopsies (Cytopathology 2007; 18 :213–9). A woman with a high‐grade cytological lesion, a repeated low‐grade lesion or with an equivocal cytology result and a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) test should be referred for colposcopy. The role of the colposcopist is to identify the source of the abnormal cells and to make an informed decision as to whether or not any treatment is required. If a patient requires treatment the colposcopist will decide which is the most appropriate method of treatment for each individual woman. The colposcopist should also organize appropriate follow‐up for each woman seen. Reflex testing for high‐risk HPV types of women with atypical squamous cells (ASC) of undetermined significance with referral for colposcopy of women who test positive is a first option. Repeat cytology is a second possibility. Direct referral to a gynaecologist should be restricted to special circumstances. Follow‐up of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is more difficult because currently there is no evidence to support any method of management as being optimal; repeat cytology and colposcopy are options, but HPV testing is not sufficiently selective, unless for older women. Women with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC‐H) should be referred without triage. Women with glandular lesions require particular attention. In a subsequent issue of Cytopathology, the second part of Chapter 6 will be presented, with recommendations for management and treatment of histologically confirmed intraepithelial neoplasia and guidance for follow‐up of special cases such as women who are pregnant, postmenopausal or immunocompromised.     

Atypical glandular cells in cervical smears: histological correlation and a suggested plan of management based on age of the patient in a low-resource setting

Objectives:  To perform an audit of all smears reported as atypical glandular cells (AGC) using the Bethesda system (TBS) 2001.
Methods:  A total of 18 376 cervical smears were screened from January 2005 to June 2007, of which 65 cases were reported as AGC. Follow-up histology was available in 31 cases (47.7%), in whom a detailed cytological/histological correlation was carried out.
Results:  AGC constituted 0.35% of all Pap smears. Follow-up histology was normal or benign in 20 cases, whereas a squamous or glandular abnormality was seen in 11 cases. Squamous abnormalities included one case each of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1, CIN2 and CIN3 and five cases of squamous cell carcinoma. All glandular epithelial abnormalities were endometrial in origin and included two endometrial adenocarcinomas and one uterine serous carcinoma. Neither in situ nor invasive adenocarcinoma of the endocervix was observed. Review of smears and reclassification as AGC, not otherwise specified and favour neoplasia revealed a higher proportion of abnormality in the latter group, reaffirming the utility of subtyping. The median age of women with AGC was 41 years. The outcome was analysed with respect to the median age. In women aged equal or more than 40 years, AGC reflected a high-grade squamous or glandular epithelial abnormality in 50% of cases compared with none in those less than 40 years old ( P  = 0.010).
Conclusion:  The age of the woman as well as the subtype of atypical glandular cells influences outcome and hence must be taken into consideration while formulating an acceptable management strategy in these women in a low-resource setting.     

Cervical cytology/histology discrepancy: a 4‐year review of patient outcome

E. L. Moss, A. Moran, G. Douce, J. Parkes, R. W. Todd and C. E. W. Redman Cervical cytology/histology discrepancy: a 4‐year review of patient outcome Objective: To investigate the diagnosis, review and management of women identified as having a cytology/histology discrepancy. Methods: A review of all patients diagnosed with a discrepancy between referral smear and cervical histology was performed between January 2003 and December 2004. Cases were followed for a minimum of 4 years and patient management and outcome reviewed. Results: A significant discrepancy was identified in 79 cases, 0.1% of all smears (n = 80 926) analysed during the study period. A discrepancy between cytology and histology, obtained from large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), was confirmed by multidisciplinary review in 42 cases (53.2%). In 37 cases (46.8%) the cytological and/or histological diagnosis was revised; the cytology was significantly more likely than the histology to be amended (chi square P = 0.005), most often because cytology had been overcalled. Of the confirmed discrepancy cases, 33 (78.6%) were due to high‐grade squamous cell or glandular abnormalities on cytology with a negative, inflammatory or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection on histology (HGC/NH). HGC/NH cases were managed by cytological follow‐up in 29 (87.9%), of which 72.4% of the smears were negative when performed at least 6 months post‐excision. During the 4‐year follow‐up period six women with a confirmed HGC/NH underwent a repeat cervical excision (hysterectomy or LLETZ), and of these, HPV effect was seen in two cases but no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was detected in any of the histological specimens. Conclusion: Cytology overcall was responsible for the majority of cytology/histology discrepancies. A confirmed discrepancy is not an indication for a further excisional biopsy but follow‐up is essential because a small percentage of patients may have disease that has been missed.     

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cytology In Women Referred For Colposcopy and Biopsy: the Results of a 1 Year Audit

The results of weekly colposcopy review meetings have been audited for 1 year and cases where there was a discrepancy between the referral cervical smear and the initial colposcopy biopsy have been analysed. New referrals (n = 476) for colposcopy were studied. In the final outcome 80% of 326 women referred for moderate or severe dyskaryosis were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or III or invasive carcinoma. Three women found to have invasive carcinoma had been referred for severely dyskaryotic smears. Twenty women were referred for smears with cell changes suggesting glandular neoplasia: five were found to have adenocarcinoma in situ, whereas eight had CIN and seven had negative biopsies. The results justify the referral policy and demonstrate the need for further investigation when initial colposcopic biopsies are negative.     

Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?

K. Sigurdsson
Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? Background: The comparative sensitivity of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) test and conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. Material and methods: This study analyses the distribution of cytology, histology, colposcopy and large loop excision of the transformation zone among women screened in Iceland with LBC at the Cancer Detection Clinic in Reykjavik and with a conventional Pap smear outside the Detection Clinic in 2007–2011. The study material included 42 654 LBC tests from 20 439 women and 103 909 Pap smears from 61 574 women. The period 2000–2004 is used to correct for potential bias as a result of unequal distribution of the studied parameters between the study sites before the introduction of LBC. Results: The observed results indicated that women screened with an LBC sample had significantly decreased detection rates of inadequate smears, increased detection of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)/atypical cytology and referrals to colposcopy, and an increased detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) irrespective of age. LBC increased significantly the detection rates of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+) cytology and CIN3+ histology only in women under 40 years of age. Taking into consideration the unequal prevalence of the studied parameters between the study sites in 2000–2004 indicated, however, that LBC only affected the rate of inadequate and low‐grade cytology tests under the age of 40 years. Positive predictive values for CIN2+ were not significantly different between the tests. Conclusions: The study results support the view that LBC is no more sensitive than Pap smears for the detection of HSIL+ and CIN2+ irrespective of age. LBC decreased the rate of inadequate smears, but increased the rate of low‐grade cytology under the age of 40 years and decreased the total rate of abnormal smears over the age of 40 years.     

Colposcopic management of high‐grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting ‘see and treat'?

OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme monitors the quality of colposcopy services through the annual KC65 returns. The 2002 returns demonstrated that Standard 7c, which specifies a biopsy rate > or = 90% at first colposcopy visit for high-grade referrals, was not met in the assessed 3-month period. This was investigated along with the other standards. METHODS: Retrospective colposcopy records were accessed for the 597 new referrals, excluding 10 pregnant patients, seen at the colposcopy clinic at the Royal Victoria Infirmary between 1 July 2001 and 31 December 2002, following an abnormal high-grade smear. Cytology and histopathology computer records were checked for confirmation. The results were assessed against the colposcopy standards applicable at that time and the revised standards (2004). RESULTS: Biopsies were taken from 94.47% (Standard > or = 90%) of women at index colposcopy visit including wire loop excision biopsies from 66.16% (87.97% of high-grade colposcopic appearances). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on histology was found in 91.79% in the study group (Standard > or = 85%) and in 96.71% of index visit biopsies (Standard > or = 90%), meeting the applicable colposcopy standards. The revised 2004 standards specify a biopsy in > or = 95% of high-grade referrals and excision biopsies in 95% if colposcopic appearances are also high-grade, if colposcopy is low grade but the smear is severely dyskaryotic, or when the lesion extends into the canal. The positive predictive value of high-grade cytology for this entire group was 75.54% with CIN present in 90.95%. CONCLUSION: From this study it appears that high-grade cytology in this centre reliably indicates high-grade CIN. Therefore, in women referred for colposcopy following a high-grade smear, excision biopsies should be performed in a higher proportion at the first visit to comply with the revised standards.     

Sensitivity of the Pap test in detecting high grade lesions: what should be the acceptable cytologic threshold for colposcopic referral?

OBJECTIVE: To devise an optimal cytology threshold for colposcopy referral in resource-limited settings. STUDY DESIGN: Four hundred seventy-two symptomatic women 20-60 years old were screened by both cytology and colposcopy. Onsite biopsy was taken if lesions grade 1 or above were detected on colposcopy. Women found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and above lesions on histopathology were stratified according to their cytologic diagnosis (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]+ threshold, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]+ threshold, and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]+ threshold). The comparative sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in each group were calculated, taking biopsy as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LSIL + cytology to detect CIN 2+ lesions was 91.5% (referral load, 30.7%). While the sensitivity of ASCUS+ cytology threshold was almost the same (92.3%), the referral load was much higher (42.2%). With HSIL+ cytology threshold, though the referral load was reduced substantially (21.9%), the sensitivity also decreased, to 81.5%. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in order to achieve high sensitivity, the LSIL cytology threshold appears to be optimum for colposcopic referrals.     

How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?

The prevalence of endocervical adenocarcinoma and its precursors has increased, in part due to increased diagnostic awareness of these lesions. To date, limited information has been published regarding the predictive value of glandular abnormalities in cervical smears. This study details the histological follow up of 418 cervical smears showing glandular abnormality, reported in our department over a six year period from 1993 to 1998. Histological follow up was available for 395 of the 418 smears (94.50%). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) for this group of smears was 72.66% for either significant glandular or squamous pathology (at least low grade cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia or CIN2 on follow up biopsy), and 55.70% for significant glandular pathology alone. Examination of subcategories of abnormal glandular smear showed that the PPV increased with the degree of abnormality reported within the smears.     

Proffered Papers 10.30–11.15 Monday 15 September 2003 4 An audit of the positive predictive value of high‐grade dyskaryosis for CIN 2 or worse on histology

Introduction Colposcopy Quality Standards state that more than 85% of excisional biopsies should show CIN 1 or worse. Data from the National KC65 reports show a large difference between units (50% to 100%). This study investigates the reasons for failure to meet the standard. Methods A review of 1158 consecutive new and 1043 follow‐up colposcopy examinations from a colposcopy database in East Somerset. Patients were treated at the time of initial examination if there was a clinically significant lesion, or at follow‐up depending on the results of investigations. Results Only 59% of excisional biopsies showed CIN 1 or worse. The possible reasons for failure to meet the standard were explored. Possible explanations explored are erroneous colposcopy, false negative histology, and false positive cytology. The cytology–histology correlation was compared between excisional and directed biopsies, and between the two local cytology screening departments. Conclusions The collection of meaningful national data has more to do with careful definition than clinical practice or data collection.