Phosphorylation of p53 Is Regulated by TPX2-Aurora A in Xenopus Oocytes

p53 is an important tumor suppressor regulating the cell cycle at multiple stages in higher vertebrates. The p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated in human cancers, resulting in loss of p53 activity. This leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, three phenotypes also observed after overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Aurora A. Accordingly, recent studies have focused on the relationship between these two proteins. p53 and Aurora A have been reported to interact in mammalian cells, but the function of this interaction remains unclear. We recently reported that Xenopus p53 can inhibit Aurora A activity in vitro but only in the absence of TPX2. Here we investigate the interplay between Xenopus Aurora A, TPX2, and p53 and show that newly synthesized TPX2 is required for nearly all Aurora A activation and for full p53 synthesis and phosphorylation in vivo during oocyte maturation. In vitro, phosphorylation mediated by Aurora A targets serines 129 and 190 within the DNA binding domain of p53. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down studies indicate that the interaction occurs via the p53 transactivation domain and the Aurora A catalytic domain around the T-loop. Our studies suggest that targeting of TPX2 might be an effective strategy for specifically inhibiting the phosphorylation of Aurora A substrates, including p53.Aurora A is an oncogenic protein kinase that is active in mitosis and plays important roles in spindle assembly and centrosome function (1). Overexpression of either human or Xenopus Aurora A transforms mammalian cells, but only when the p53 pathway is altered (2–4). Aurora A is localized on centrosomes during mitosis, and overexpression of the protein leads to centrosome amplification and aneuploidy (2, 3, 5, 6), two likely contributors to genomic instability (7, 8). Because of its oncogenic potential and amplification in human tumors, considerable attention has been focused on the mechanism of Aurora A activation in mitosis. Evidence from several laboratories indicates that activation occurs as a result of phosphorylation of a threonine residue in the T-loop of the kinase (4, 9, 10). Purification of Aurora A-activating activity from M phase Xenopus egg extracts led to an apparent activation mechanism in which autophosphorylation at the T-loop is stimulated by binding of the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) (11–14). On the other hand, it has been shown that Aurora A activity can be inhibited by interaction with several proteins, including PP1 (protein phosphatase 1), AIP (Aurora A kinase-interacting protein), and, more recently, p53 (9, 15–17).p53 is a well known tumor suppressor able to drive cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, or senescence when DNA is damaged or cell integrity is threatened (18, 19). In human cancers, the p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated, leading to inactivation of p53 functions (20). p53 protein is almost undetectable in “normal cells,” mainly due to its instability. Indeed, during a normal cell cycle, p53 associates with Mdm2 in the nucleus and thereafter undergoes nuclear exclusion, allowing its ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (21). In cells under stress, p53 is stabilized through the disruption of its interaction with Mdm2 (21), leading to p53 accumulation in the nucleus and triggering different responses, as described above.Although p53 has mostly been characterized as a nuclear protein, it has also been shown to localize on centrosomes (22–24) and regulate centrosome duplication (23, 24). Centrosomes are believed to act as scaffolds that concentrate many regulatory molecules involved in signal transduction, including multiple protein kinases (25). Thus, centrosomal localization of p53 might be important for its own regulation by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and one of its regulators could be the mitotic kinase Aurora A. Indeed, phenotypes associated with the misexpression of these two proteins are very similar. For example, overexpression of Aurora A kinase leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, and the same effects are often observed after down-regulation of p53 transactivation activity or deletion/mutation of its gene (26, 27).Several recent studies performed in mammalian models show interplay between p53 and Aurora A, with each protein having the ability to inhibit the other, depending on the stage of the cell cycle and the stress level of the cell (17, 28, 29). These studies reported that p53 is a substrate of Aurora A, and serines 215 and 315 were demonstrated to be the two major Aurora A phosphorylation sites in human p53 in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ser-215 within the DNA binding domain of human p53 inhibited both p53 DNA binding and transactivation activities (29). Recently, our group showed that Xenopus p53 is able to inhibit Aurora A kinase activity in vitro, but this inhibitory effect can be suppressed by prior binding of Aurora A to TPX2 (9). Contrary to somatic cells, where p53 is nuclear, unstable, and expressed at a very low level, p53 is highly expressed in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and stable until later stages of development (30, 31). The high concentration of both p53 and Aurora A in the oocyte provided a suitable basis for investigating p53-Aurora A interaction and also evaluating Xenopus p53 as a substrate of Aurora A.     

Identification of rCop-1, a New Member of the CCN Protein Family,as a Negative Regulator for Cell Transformation

By using a model system for cell transformation mediated by the cooperation of the activated H-ras oncogene and the inactivated p53 tumor suppressor gene, rCop-1 was identified by mRNA differential display as a gene whose expression became lost after cell transformation. Homology analysis indicates that rCop-1 belongs to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN, which includes connective-tissue growth factor, CYR61, CEF10 (v-src inducible), and the product of the nov proto-oncogene. Unlike the other members of the CCN gene family, rCop-1 is not an immediate-early gene, it lacks the conserved C-terminal domain which was shown to confer both growth-stimulating and heparin-binding activities, and its expression is lost in cells transformed by a variety of mechanisms. Ectopic expression of rCop-1 by retroviral gene transfers led to cell death in a transformation-specific manner. These results suggest that rCop-1 represents a new class of CCN family proteins that have functions opposing those of the previously identified members.Oncogenic conversion of a normal cell into a tumor cell requires multiple genetic alterations (12). Of particular interest is the fact that mutations in both ras oncogenes (3) and the p53 tumor suppressor gene cooperate in transformation of mammalian cells (11). Mutations in both ras and the p53 gene were also found at high frequencies in a variety of human cancers, including those of the colon, lung, and pancreas (2, 18). It has been proposed that both p53 and Ras function, whether directly or through other signaling molecules, to control expression of genes that are important for cell growth and differentiation (13, 17, 37). To this end, several ras target genes (10) and p53 target genes, including those encoding p21/CIP1/WAF1, an inhibitor of G₁ cyclin-dependent kinase (9); Mdm-2, a negative regulator of p53 (1); GADD45, a protein involved in DNA repair (36); and Bax, which promotes apoptosis (28), have been identified. Most of these genes, except p21/CIP1/WAF1, which was cloned by subtractive hybridization, were identified by the candidate gene hypothesis. Recently, more p53 target genes have been isolated by the differential display technique, including those coding for cyclin G (31); MAP4, a microtubule-associated protein negatively regulated by p53 (29); and PAG608, a novel nuclear zinc finger protein whose overexpression promotes apoptosis (14). Functional characterizations of these genes have shed light on the role of p53 in cell cycle control and apoptosis. However, genes that mediate tumor suppression activity by p53 remain elusive.The fact that neither the inactivation of p53 nor the activation of Ras alone is able to transform primary mammalian cells (34), whereas both mutations together can do so, suggests that genes regulated by p53 and Ras cooperate in upsetting normal cell growth control cells (11). Using differential display (22), we set out to identify genes whose expression is altered by both mutant ras and p53 by comparing the mRNA expression profiles of normal rat embryo fibroblasts (REFs) and their derivatives transformed by either a constitutively inactivated or a temperature-sensitive mutant p53 in cooperation with the activated H-ras oncogene (11, 27). In this report we describe the identification and give a functional characterization of rCop-1, a gene whose expression is abolished by cell transformation. By sequence homology, rCop-1 was found to belong to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN (which stands for connective-tissue growth factor [CTGF], CEF10/Cyr61, and Nov) (4). Here we show that rCop-1 may represent a novel class of CCN family proteins based on its unique cell cycle expression pattern, its lack of the C-terminal (CT) domain conserved in all CCN proteins, its loss of expression in all transformed cells analyzed, and its ability to confer cytotoxicity to the transformed cells.