Involvement of PPARα and PPARγ in apoptosis and proliferation of human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells

Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors (PPARs) mediate the effects of various ligands, known as peroxisome proliferators, a heterogeneous class of compounds including industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and biomolecules such as fatty acids and eicosanoids. Among peroxisome proliferators, fibrate derivatives are considered specific ligands for PPARα, whereas eicosanoids, such as PGJ2, for PPARγ. The study aimed to clarify the relation between PPARs and apoptosis or proliferation on the same type of cells, using clofibrate as specific ligand of PPARα and PGJ2 as specific ligand of PPARγ. The cells used were human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells. The results showed that PPARα protein content increased in HepG2 cells treated with clofibrate, causing apoptosis in a time‐ and concentration‐dependent way, as evidenced by the citofluorimetric assay and determination of BAD, myc and protein phosphatase 2A protein content. It also emerged that PPARγ increased in the same cells when treated with a specific ligand of this PPAR; in this case the increase of PPARγ did not cause an increase of apoptosis, but a time‐ and concentration‐dependent inhibition of cell proliferation, evidenced by decreased cell numbers and increased number of cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cycle. It may be concluded that PPARα is chiefly related to apoptosis and PPARγ to cell proliferation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Serum regulates adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells via MEK/ERK‐dependent PPARγ expression and phosphorylation

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide us an excellent cellular model to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying adipogenic differentiation of adult stem cells. PPARγ had been considered as an important molecular marker of cells undergoing adipogenic differentiation. Here, we demonstrated that expression and phosphorylation of PPARγ could be found in bone marrow–derived MSCs cultured in expansion medium without any adipogenic additives (dexamethasone, IBMX, insulin or indomethacin). Then, PPARγ was dephosphorylated in MSCs during the process of adipogenic differentiation. We then found that inhibition of MEK activation by specific inhibitor (PD98059) counteracted the PPARγ expression and phosphorylation. However, expression and phosphorylation of PPARγ did not present in MSCs cultured in medium with lower serum concentration. When these MSCs differentiated into adipocytes, no phosphorylation could be detected to accompany the expression of PPARγ. Moreover, exposure of MSCs to higher concentration of serum induced stronger PPARγ expression, and subsequently enhanced their adipogenesis. These data suggested that activation of the MEK/ERK signalling pathway by high serum concentration promoted PPARγ expression and phosphorylation, and subsequently enhanced adipogenic differentiation of MSCs.     

PPARγ activation induces autophagy in breast cancer cells

It has been previously shown that PPARγ ligands induce apoptotic cell death in a variety of cancer cells. Given the evidence that these ligands have a receptor-independent function, we further examined the specific role of PPARγ activation in this biological process. Surprisingly, we failed to demonstrate that MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells undergo apoptosis when treated with sub-saturation doses of troglitazone and rosiglitazone, which are synthetic PPARγ ligands. Acridine orange (AO) staining showed acidic vesicular formation within ligand-treated cells, indicative of autophagic activity. This was confirmed by autophagosome formation as indicated by redistribution of LC3, an autophagy-specific protein, and the appearance of double-membrane autophagic vacuoles by electron microscopy following exposure to ligand. To determine the mechanism by which PPARγ induces autophagy, we transduced primary mammary epithelial cells with a constitutively active mutant of PPARγ and screened gene expression associated with PPARγ activation by genome-wide array analysis. HIF1α and BNIP3 were among 42 genes up-regulated by active PPARγ. Activation of PPARγ induced HIF1α and BNIP3 protein and mRNA abundance. HIF1α knockdown by shRNA abolished the autophagosome formation induced by PPARγ activation. In summary, our data shows a specific induction of autophagy by PPARγ activation in breast cancer cells providing an understanding of distinct roles of PPARγ in tumorigenesis.     

Fenoxycarb promotes adipogenesis in 3T3‐L1 preadipocytes

Lipophilic insect hormones and their analogs affect mammalian physiology by regulating the expression of metabolic genes. Therefore, we determined the effect of fenoxycarb, a juvenile hormone analog, on lipid metabolism in adipocytes. Here, we demonstrated that fenoxycarb dose‐dependently promoted lipid accumulation in 3T3‐L1 adipocytes during adipocyte differentiation and that its lipogenic effect was comparable to that of rosiglitazone, a well‐known ligand for peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). Furthermore, fenoxycarb stimulated PPARγ activity without affecting other nuclear receptors, such as liver X receptor (LXR), farnesoid X‐activated receptor (FXR) and Nur77. In addition, fenoxycarb treatment increased the expression of PPARγ and fatty acid transporter protein 1 (FATP1) in 3T3‐L1 adipocytes, suggesting that fenoxycarb may facilitate adipocyte differentiation by enhancing PPARγ signaling, the master regulator of adipogenesis. Together, our results suggest that fenoxycarb promoted lipid accumulation in adipocytes, in part, by stimulating PPARγ.     

Absence of estrogen receptor beta leads to abnormal adipogenesis during early tendon healing by an up‐regulation of PPARγ signalling

Achilles tendon injury is one of the challenges of sports medicine, the aetiology of which remains unknown. For a long time, estrogen receptor β (ERβ) has been known as a regulating factor of the metabolism in many connective tissues, such as bone, muscle and cartilage, but little is known about its role in tendon. Recent studies have implicated ERβ as involved in the process of tendon healing. Tendon‐derived stem cells (TDSCs) are getting more and more attention in tendon physiological and pathological process. In this study, we investigated how ERβ played a role in Achilles tendon healing. Achilles tendon injury model was established to analyse how ERβ affected on healing process in vivo. Cell proliferation assay, Western blots, qRT‐PCR and immunocytochemistry were performed to investigate the effect of ERβ on TDSCs. Here, we showed that ERβ deletion in mice resulted in inferior gross appearance, histological scores and, most importantly, increased accumulation of adipocytes during the early tendon healing which involved activation of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) signalling. Furthermore, in vitro results of ours confirmed that the abnormity might be the result of abnormal TDSC adipogenic differentiation which could be partially reversed by the treatment of ERβ agonist LY3201. These data revealed a role of ERβ in Achilles tendon healing for the first time, thereby providing a new target for clinical treatment of Achilles tendon injury.     

CD38 deficiency suppresses adipogenesis and lipogenesis in adipose tissues through activating Sirt1/PPARγ signaling pathway

It has been recently reported that CD38 was highly expressed in adipose tissues from obese people and CD38‐deficient mice were resistant to high‐fat diet (HFD)‐induced obesity. However, the role of CD38 in the regulation of adipogenesis and lipogenesis is unknown. In this study, to explore the roles of CD38 in adipogenesis and lipogenesis in vivo and in vitro, obesity models were generated with male CD38^?/? and WT mice fed with HFD. The adipocyte differentiations were induced with MEFs from WT and CD38^?/? mice, 3T3‐L1 and C3H10T1/2 cells in vitro. The lipid accumulations and the alternations of CD38 and the genes involved in adipogenesis and lipogenesis were determined with the adipose tissues from the HFD‐fed mice or the MEFs, 3T3‐L1 and C3H10T1/2 cells during induction of adipocyte differentiation. The results showed that CD38^?/? male mice were significantly resistant to HFD‐induced obesity. CD38 expressions in adipocytes were significantly increased in WT mice fed with HFD, and the similar results were obtained from WT MEFs, 3T3‐L1 and C3H10T1/2 during induction of adipocyte differentiation. The expressions of PPARγ, AP2 and C/EBPα were markedly attenuated in adipocytes from HFD‐fed CD38^?/? mice and CD38^?/? MEFs at late stage of adipocyte differentiation. Moreover, the expressions of SREBP1 and FASN were also significantly decreased in CD38^?/? MEFs. Finally, the CD38 deficiency‐mediated activations of Sirt1 signalling were up‐regulated or down‐regulated by resveratrol and nicotinamide, respectively. These results suggest that CD38 deficiency impairs adipogenesis and lipogenesis through activating Sirt1/PPARγ‐FASN signalling pathway during the development of obesity.     

Ghrelin inhibits early osteogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells by suppressing Runx2 expression and enhancing PPARγ and C/EBPα expression

Ghrelin is a 28‐residue peptide identified in the stomach as an endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor that is expressed in a variety of peripheral tissues, as well as in the brain. In previous studies, ghrelin has been shown to stimulate both adipogenic differentiation from preadipocytes and osteogenic differentiation from preosteoblasts or primary osteoblasts. This study was undertaken to investigate the direct effect of ghrelin on the lineage allocation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We identified ghrelin receptor mRNA in C3H10T1/2 cells, and we found the levels of this mRNA to be attenuated during osteogenic differentiation. Treatment of cells with ghrelin resulted in both proliferation and inhibition of caspase‐3 activity. In addition, ghrelin decreased serum deprivation‐induced bax protein expression and release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria, whereas it increased bcl‐2 protein expression. Moreover, ghrelin inhibited early osteogenic differentiation, as shown by alkaline phosphatase activity and staining, and inhibited osteoblast‐specific genes expression by altering Runx2, PPARγ, and C/EBPα protein expression. J. Cell. Biochem. 106: 626–632, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.