Immunological monitoring of the tumor immunoenvironment for clinical trials

Monitoring of immunotherapeutic clinical trials has undergone a considerable change in the last decade resulting in a general agreement that immune monitoring should guide the development of cancer vaccines. The emphasis on immune cell functions and quantitation of antigen-specific T cells have been playing a major role in the attempts to establish meaningful correlations between therapy-induced alterations in immune responses and clinical endpoints. However, one significant unresolved issue in modern immunotherapy is that when a tumor-specific cellular immune response is observed following the course of immunotherapy, it does not always lead to clinically proven cancer regression. This disappointing lack of a correlation between the tumor-specific cytotoxic immune responses and the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy may be explained, among other reasons, by the notion that the analysis of any single immunological parameter is not sufficient to provide clinically feasible information about the complex interactions between different cell subsets in the peripheral blood and immune, tumor, and stromal cells in the tumor milieu. By contrast, a systemic approach is required for improving the quality of a serial monitoring to ensure that it adequately and reliably measures potential changes induced in patients by administered vaccines or immunomodulators. Comprehensive evaluation of the balance between the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive compartments of the immune system could be critical for a better understanding of how a given immunotherapy works or does not work in a particular clinical trial. New approaches to characterize tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, their phenotypic, biochemical, and genetic characteristics within the tumor microenvironment need to be developed and validated and should complement current monitoring techniques. These immune-monitoring assays for the local tumor immunoenvironment should be developed, validated, and standardized for reliability and consistency in order to establish the overall performance standards.     

Analysis of HLA class I expression in progressing and regressing metastatic melanoma lesions after immunotherapy

Despite the potential efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in preclinical studies, it did not show yet significant positive clinical results in humans with only a small number of cancer patients demonstrating objective tumor regression. This poor clinical outcome can be explained by the generation of sophisticated tumor immune escape mechanism, in particular, abnormalities in the expression of HLA class I antigens. We have studied the expression of HLA class I antigens in ten metastatic lesions obtained from a melanoma patient undergoing immunotherapy. Five lesions were obtained after Interferon-alpha-2b treatment and five after autologous vaccination plus BCG (M-VAX). Eight metastases were regressing after immunotherapy while two were progressing. The eight regressing metastases showed high level of HLA class I expression, whereas the two progressing lesions had low levels as measured by real time PCR and immunohistological techniques. These results indicate a strong association between HLA class I expression and progression or regression of the metastatic lesions. Our data support the hypothesis that the level of HLA class I expression is an important parameter of tumor immune escape that needs to be monitored.     

Real-time monitoring of immune responses

With the advent of cellular immunotherapy, the ability to monitor immune responses during treatment will be essential to evaluate the effectiveness of the new therapies. While the ultimate determinate of the success of immunotherapy trials will be clinical outcome, methods of monitoring immunity in real-time have become available that will assist in the development of immunotherapy strategies and in the prediction of individual patient prognosis during the course of treatment. The essentials of existing immune assays are described here with examples of how these techniques have been used previously. A perspective on which approaches will likely prove the most useful for monitoring immune responses in real-time during immunotherapy is also presented.     

Why are dendritic cells central to cancer immunotherapy?

Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy is rapidly emerging as a viable alternative to radiation or chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer. The resurgence of interest in cancer immunotherapy reflects the promising results that have been obtained in both animal models and early clinical trials with the DC-based approach. Here I suggest that this optimism is justified because the efficient capture and presentation of antigens by DCs is central to the induction of an immune response. I argue that the mechanism by which DCs capture antigen suggests that the immune system might actually be 'blind' to tumours, thereby challenging the theory of immune surveillance.     

How to fit allergen immunotherapy in the elderly

Asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR) and atopic dermatitis are very common in young people, but in the latest decades it was increasingly recognized that also individuals of higher ages, including the population over 65 years, are concerned. Actually, it is now acknowledged the aging does not considerably alter the immune response to allergens. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that works on the causes of allergy, but elderly people are commonly excluded from AIT, except the cases of insect sting allergy. A number of recent studies showed that aged individuals also successfully respond to AIT for respiratory allergy. Therefore, there is no reason to exclude elder patients from AIT. Anyhow, clinical conditions that are considered absolute or relative contraindications are quite frequent in this aged population, thus the risk/benefit ratio must be carefully evaluated for each patient, taking into account that the more frequent occurrence of co-morbidities and the consequent need of daily-based multidrug regimen can favor adverse effects. An important issue concern the ability of AIT, and particularly of sublingual immunotherapy, to significantly improve the quality of life, that often is particularly impaired in the elderly, reducing symptoms and drugs consumption.     

Radiotherapy: Brightness and darkness in the era of immunotherapy

The introduction of immunotherapy into cancer treatment has radically changed clinical management of tumors. However, only a minority of patients (approximately 10 to 30%) exhibit long-term response to monotherapy with immunotherapy. Moreover, there are still many cancer types, including pancreatic cancer and glioma, which are resistant to immunotherapy. Due to the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has achieved better therapeutic effects in a number of clinical trials. However, radiotherapy is a double-edged sword in the sense that it also attenuates the immune system under certain doses and fractionation schedules, not all clinical trials show improved survival in the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Therefore, elucidation of the interactions between radiotherapy and the immune system is warranted to optimize the synergistic effects of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. In this review, we highlight the dark side as well as bright side of radiotherapy on tumor immune microenvironment and immune system. We also elucidate current status of radioimmunotherapy, both in preclinical and clinical studies, and highlight that combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy attenuates combinatorial effects in some circumstances. Moreover, we provide insights for better combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.     

Differentiation induced by physiological and pharmacological stimuli leads to increased antigenicity of human neuroblastoma cells

Sympathetic neuronal differentiation is associated with favorable prognosis of neuroblastoma (NB), the most common extra-cranial solid tumor of early childhood. Differentiation agents have proved useful in clinical protocols of NB treatment, but using them as a sole treatment is not sufficient to induce tumor elimination in patients. Therefore, complementary approaches, such as immunotherapy, are warranted. Here we demonstrate that differentiation of NB cell lines and ex vivo isolated tumor cells in response to physiological or pharmacological stimuli is associated with acquisition of increased antigenicity. This manifests as increased expression of surface major histocompatibility class I complexes and ICAM-1 molecules and translates into increased sensitivity of NB cells to lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells. The latter is paralleled by enhanced ability of differentiated cells to form immune conjugates and bind increased amounts of granzyme B to the cell surface. We demonstrate, for the first time, that, regardless of the stimulus applied, the differentiation state in NBs is associated with increased tumor antigenicity that enables more efficient elimination of tumor cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes and paves the way for combined application of differentiation-inducing agents and immunotherapy as an auxiliary approach in NB patients.     

Immunologic responses in patients with pulmonary carcinoma receiving immunotherapy

Summary This is a preliminary report on immune responses observed in vivo and in vitro in resectable patients treated with oral BCG, and in nonresectable patients treated with autologous tumour cells complexed with PPD and with BCG applied by scarification. In some cases, to shorten the period of sensitization, transfer factor was given additionally. Several of the in vitro methods used for assessing the immune competence of the patients are shown to be sufficiently informative to warrant their use before immunotherapy in order to assess the immunologic resources of the patient. During immunotherapy, they allow monitoring the effect of the treatment.     

Development of Search Strategy for Peptide Inhibitors of Immune Checkpoints

Current strategy for the blockade of molecules inhibiting T-cell immunity, the immune checkpoints (ICP), such as CTLA-4, PD-1, and B7-H1(PD-L1), using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), showed significant clinical effects in cancer immunotherapy. In this kind of therapy, antibodies do not kill tumor cells directly, but block inhibitory signals for T lymphocytes, resulting in activation of the immune response cascade that eliminate malignant cells and lead to tumor degradation. However, the mAb preparations have some limitations, and the development of new low-molecular-weight antagonists (for example, peptides) is an important issue. In this study, we used peptide microarrays and phage display libraries to search for peptides that interact with the immune checkpoints. We found peptides that specifically bind CTLA-4, PD-1, B7-1, B7-2 and B7-H1(PD-L1) which play important role in the regulation of the immune responses. These synthetic peptides can be applied to the development of new immunomodulating drugs for cancer immunotherapy.     

Listeria-derived ActA is an effective adjuvant for primary and metastatic tumor immunotherapy

Tumor immunotherapy is currently at the cusp of becoming an important aspect of comprehensive cancer treatment in the clinic. However, the need for improved adjuvants to augment immune responses against tumor antigens is always present. In this paper, we characterize the Listeria monocytogenes-derived actin-nucleating protein, ActA, as a novel adjuvant for use in tumor immunotherapy. ActA is a virulence factor that is expressed on the cell surface of L. monocytogenes and facilitates the production of actin tails that propel Listeria throughout the cytosol of an infected host cell. It is believed that this ActA-dependent cytosolic motility allows Listeria to evade adaptive host cell defenses and facilitates its invasion into a proximal uninfected host cell. However, there is evidence that ActA fused to a tumor antigen and delivered by L. monocytogenes can perform a beneficial function in tumor immunotherapy as an adjuvant. Our investigation of this adjuvant activity demonstrates that ActA, either fused to or administered as a mixture with a tumor antigen, can augment anti-tumor immune responses, break immune tolerance and facilitate tumor eradication, which suggests that ActA is not only an effective adjuvant in tumor immunotherapy but can also be applied in a number of therapeutic settings.     

Review: Gastric cancer: Basic aspects

Gastric cancer is still one of the most prevalent and deadliest cancers in the world. Although our knowledge about the disease has progressed extraordinarily, this has not been accompanied by our capacity to effectively treat the disease. In the last years, immunotherapy made its way into the cancer field and was responsible for major changes in the treatment success rates for several cancer types. Although gastric cancer was not among the first successful targets of this type of therapy, the relationship between this type of cancer, immunosurveillance and immunotherapy is now being actively researched. In this article, we review the literature of the past year regarding the relationship between gastric cancer, its immune microenvironment and response to immunotherapy. Published data indicate that the immune microenvironment influences the clinical behaviour of gastric cancer, and is correlated with its histologic and molecular subtypes with an emphasis on the microsatellite‐ and EBV‐positive tumour subgroups. Although the literature regarding response to immunotherapy is scarce, there is good evidence that patient stratification for immunotherapy is going to become a reality in gastric cancer.     

Immunologic biomarkers as correlates of clinical response to cancer immunotherapy

Over the last few years, several newly developed immune-based cancer therapies have been shown to induce clinical responses in significant numbers of patients. As a result, there is a need to identify immune biomarkers capable of predicting clinical response. If there were laboratory parameters that could define patients with improved disease outcomes after immunomodulation, product development would accelerate, optimization of existing immune-based treatments would be facilitated and patient selection for specific interventions might be optimized. Although there are no validated cancer immunologic biomarkers that are predictive of clinical response currently in widespread use, there is much published literature that has informed investigators as to which markers may be the most promising. Population-based studies of endogenous tumor immune infiltrates and gene expression analyses have identified specific cell populations and phenotypes of immune cells that are most likely to mediate anti-tumor immunity. Further, clinical trials of cancer vaccines and other cancer directed immunotherapy have identified candidate immunologic biomarkers that are statistically associated with beneficial clinical outcomes after immune-based cancer therapies. Biomarkers that measure the magnitude of the Type I immune response generated with immune therapy, epitope spreading, and autoimmunity are readily detected in the peripheral blood and, in clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy, have been associated with response to treatment.     

Regressing and progressing metastatic lesions: resistance to immunotherapy is predetermined by irreversible HLA class I antigen alterations

Despite the significant efforts to enhance immune reactivity against malignancies the clinical effect of anti-tumor vaccines and cancer immunotherapy is still below expectations. Understanding of the possible causes of such poor clinical outcome has become very important for improvement of the existing cancer treatment modalities. In particular, the critical role of HLA class I antigens in the success of T cell based immunotherapy has led to a growing interest in investigating the expression and function of these molecules in metastatic cancer progression and, especially in response to immunotherapy. In this report, we illustrate that two types of metastatic lesions are commonly generated in response to immunotherapy according to the pattern of HLA class I expression. We found that metastatic lesions, that progress after immunotherapy have low level of HLA class I antigens, while the regressing lesions demonstrate significant upregulation of these molecules. Presumably, immunotherapy changes tumor microenvironment and creates an additional immune selection pressure on tumor cells. As a result, two subtypes of metastatic lesions arise from pre-existing malignant cells: (a) regressors, with upregulated HLA class I expression after therapy, and (b) progressors with resistance to immunotherapy and with low level of HLA class I. Tumor cells with reversible defects (soft lesions) respond to therapy by upregulation of HLA class I expression and regress, while tumor cells with structural irreversible defects (hard lesions) demonstrate resistance to immunostimulation, fail to upregulate HLA class I antigens and eventually progress. These two types of metastases appear independently of type of the immunotherapy used, either non-specific immunomodulators (cytokines or BCG) or autologous tumor vaccination. Similarly, we also detected two types of metastatic colonies in a mouse fibrosarcoma model after in vitro treatment with IFN-gamma. One type of metastases characterized by upregulation of all MHC class I antigens and another type with partial IFN-gamma resistance, namely with lack of expression of L(d)-MHC class I molecule. Our observations may shed new light on the understanding of the mechanisms of tumor escape and might have implications for improvement of the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.     

A malignus melanoma immunterápiájának lehetoségei

Despite their well-documented immunogenicity, malignant melanomas belong to the most aggressive tumor types. A potential explanation for this is the suboptimal activation of tumor infiltrating T cells. In order to boost immune responses against tumors, a variety of treatment modalities have been tested in animal models and in clinical setting. Antigen-nonspecific approaches (e.g., IFN-alpha and IL-2), as well as active specific immunotherapeutical modalities based on the use of autologous or allogeneic tumor cell-save been investigated in clinical trials of melanoma. The identification of melanoma-associated antigens has opened new avenues in antigen-specific immunotherapy. A promising alternative for the delivery of different forms of melanoma antigens is the application of dendritic cells, the most potent antigen presenting cells capable of eliciting efficient T-cell response. Beside active immunotherapy, immune response against melanoma antigens could be increased through the adoptive transfer of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or antigen specific T-cell clones. The most important conclusion that can be drawn from the results of published immunotherapy studies is that these modalities are able to induce durable complete tumor regressions,mostly with reasonable toxicity; however, generally only in a minority of patients. This points to the importance of appropriate patient selection, with regard to the expression of the targeted antigens and HLA molecules, as well as to the general immunocompetence of the patients. A crucial and still unsolved question is monitoring immune activation during treatment, although there are promising new tools that could prove useful in this respect. The presence of tumor-reactive CTL in the circulation or in the tumors does not guarantee an efficient immune response. It is important to assess if these T cells are in an activated and functional state. Finally, in several single target antigen-based clinical studies a therapy-induced immunoselection of antigen-negative clones, leading to disease progression, was observed. This could be overcome with the use of antigen cocktails or whole tumor approaches. A better understanding of the mechanisms of action of immunotherapeutical modalities may enhance the success rate of these strategies.     

Immune and genetic therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Although we have witnessed advances in many aspects of cancer research and therapy in recent years, the ability to cure the majority of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains elusive. At the same time, it has become increasingly apparent that a better understanding of the genetic alterations and immune dysregulations in RCC will play a key role in finding a treatment. Therefore, clinical trials directed at specific genetic alterations and studies exploiting components of the immune system are being conducted. These studies provide new hope for an improved outlook for patients presenting with advanced RCC. The future prospects of RCC therapy will be, without doubt, built on the foundation of current investigative efforts in gene and immune therapy. This article reviews the current role of immunotherapy and gene therapy in the management of metastatic RCC. Finally, current clinical trials focusing on gene and immune therapies are listed.     

A proposal for a simple and inexpensive therapeutic cancer vaccine

In this essay, I propose a new method of treating tumours, using an old and inexpensive preparation, that I contend would be of considerable benefit to patients and their cancer management. My rationale for this treatment initially arose from recent advances in the understanding of dendritic cell function. (Dendritic cells are key cells of the immune system that are able to either turn on or turn off T-cell responses.) Evidence to support this approach is found in 100-year-old studies on the immunotherapy of cancer. Also, I draw on some remarkable, but little-known studies from the 1960s-1990s, demonstrating that the preparation has already been trialled in humans (although not intratumourally, as I propose), and is considered sufficiently safe to proceed with clinical trials in cancer volunteers.     

Induction of multi-functional T cells in a phase I clinical trial of dendritic cell immunotherapy in hepatitis C virus infected individuals

We have previously reported a world-first phase I clinical trial to treat HCV patients using monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC) loaded with HCV-specific lipopeptides. While the brief treatment proved to be safe, it failed to reduce the viral load and induced only transient cell-mediated immune responses, measured by IFNγ ELIspot. Here we reanalysed the PBMC samples from this trial to further elucidate the immunological events associated with the Mo-DC therapy. We found that HCV-specific single- and multi-cytokine secreting T cells were induced by the Mo-DC immunotherapy in some patients, although at irregular intervals and not consistently directed to the same HCV antigen. Despite the vaccination, the responses were generally poor in quality and comprised of primarily single-cytokine secreting cells. The frequency of FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) fluctuated following DC infusion and eventually dropped to below baseline by week 12, an interesting trend suggesting that the vaccination may have resulted in a more subtle outcome than was initially apparent. Our data suggested that Mo-DC therapy induced complex immune responses in vivo that may or may not lead to clinical benefit.     

Spinning molecular immunology into successful immunotherapy

Until recently, immunotherapies have been of limited success, particularly against cancer. However, recent insights into the cells, molecules and signalling pathways that regulate immune responsiveness are providing new approaches for immunotherapy. In this article, I review some of the most promising molecular and cellular targets for immunotherapy and discuss approaches that use these targets to amplify immune responses and potentially break antigen-specific tolerance. These strategies provide a blueprint for the development of successful immunotherapy over the next decade.     

Identification of immune microenvironment subtypes that predicted the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with high mortality rate. However, the correlation between immune microenvironment and prognosis of OC remains unclear. This study aimed to explore prognostic significance of OC tumour microenvironment. The OC data set was selected from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA), and 307 samples were collected. Hierarchical clustering was performed according to the expression of 756 genes. The immune and matrix scores of all immune subtypes were determined, and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyse the differences in the immune and matrix scores between OC samples with different immune subtypes. The model for predicting prognosis was constructed based on the expression of immune-related genes. TIDE platform was applied to predict the effect of immunotherapy on patients with OC of different immune subtypes. The 307 OC samples were classified into three immune subtypes A-C. Patients in subtype B had poorer prognosis and lower survival rate. The infiltration of helper T cells and macrophages in microenvironment indicated significant differences between immune subtypes. Enrichment analyses of immune cell molecular pathways showed that JAK–STAT3 pathway changed significantly in subtype B. Furthermore, predictive response to immunotherapy in subtype B was significantly higher than that in subtype A and C. Immune subtyping can be used as an independent predictor of the prognosis of OC patients, which may be related to the infiltration patterns of immune cells in tumour microenvironment. In addition, patients in immune subtype B have superior response to immunotherapy, suggesting that patients in subtype B are suitable for immunotherapy.