Transforming mutations in protein-tyrosine kinase genes

Oncogenes are altered forms of normal cellular genes known as proto-oncogenes. Several oncogenes encode enzymes that phosphorylate substrate proteins at tyrosine. In most of these cases the oncogene differs from its proto-oncogene by multiple mutations that alter the structure of the encoded protein product. Here we discuss how structural changes might effect the regulation and substrate specificity of the protein kinase product of a protooncogene so that it gains the potential to transform cells.     

Oncogenes: Molecular probes for clinical application in malignant diseases

We are now, by means of remarkable genetic engineering techniques, able to utilize retroviral oncogenes to probe for and define a number of homologously associated genes. These genes, the proto-oncogenes, are thought to be involved in the conversion of normal cells to neoplasia. These genes are known to be of normal cellular origin, but many were initially identified in retroviruses. Proto-oncogenes are highly conserved throughout the animal kingdom and are believed to play significant roles in cellular growth and/or differentiation. These proto-oncogenes have been associated recently with a number of chromosomal abnormalities involving certain malignant diseases. Cytogenetic data is accumulating that correlates specific proto-oncogene alterations with known chromosomal insults, such as breaks, rearrangements, and translocation, each associated with certain leukemias and malignancies. These studies have great potential for new approaches in treatment modalities, employing oncogenes as markers in predictive and pathologic diagnosis. For now the goal to use oncogenes as markers of neoplasia is certainly sufficient to justify current research efforts.     

Oncogenes in hematologic neoplasia

Proto-oncogenes are normal genes involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Structural alterations in these genes can convert them to oncogenes involved in the initiation or progression of malignancy. About 50 proto-oncogenes have been described and four different activation mechanisms are known. Proto-oncogene alterations specific for human hematologic malignancies are well characterized.     

Analysis of oncogene and its expression at cellular level

Remarkable progresses have been made in the field of oncogenes in the last several years. More than 40 oncogenes or proto-oncogenes were identified by transfection assay and by weak homology of base sequences with known oncogenes. Many of them were shown to play a specific role in regulation of cell growth and signal transduction, but their exact roles in development and progression of human cancers are still not clear. Study of oncogenes and their expression at cellular level using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization will contribute to understand how oncogenes are involved in the multiple steps of carcinogenesis. In this article, application of newly established monoclonal antibodies to ras p21 for immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting analysis and possibilities of DNA analysis using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks are discussed.     

Transformation effector and suppressor genes.

Much has been learned about the molecular basis of cancer from the study of the dominantly acting viral and cellular oncogenes and their normal progenitors, the proto-oncogenes. More recent studies have resulted in the isolation and characterization of several genes prototypic of a second class of cancer genes. Whereas oncogenes act to promote the growth of cells, members of this latter class of genes act to inhibit cellular growth and are believed to contribute to the tumorigenic phenotype only when their activities are absent. This new class of cancer genes is referred to by a number of different names including; anti-oncogenes, recessive oncogenes, growth suppressor genes, tumor suppressor genes and emerogenes. Although only a few of these cancer genes have been identified, to date, it is likely that many additional genes of this class await identification. A third class of genes, necessary for the development of the cancer phenotype, is comprised of the transformation effector genes. These are normal cellular genes that encode proteins that cooperate with or activate oncogene functions and thereby induce the development of the neoplastic phenotype. The inactivation of transformation effector functions would therefore inhibit the ability of certain dominantly acting oncogenes to transform cells. The approaches outlined here describe functional assays for the isolation and molecular characterization of transformation effector and suppressor genes.     

Oncogenes and anti-oncogenes in tumorigenesis

Recent advances have led to the identification of cellular genes which are involved in the initiation and progression of tumorigenesis. The proto-oncogenes, which normally participate in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation, can become oncogenes through alterations in the regulation of their expression and/or their coding sequences. Their contribution to the tumorigenic phenotype is dominant. The anti-oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes or recessive oncogenes are normally implicated in a negative regulation of cellular proliferation. The loss of their activity contributes to tumorigenesis in a recessive manner. Genetic events activating proto-oncogenes or inactivating anti-oncogenes accumulate in the same cell during tumor progression and co-operate to determine the malignant invasive phenotype of advanced tumors.     

Establishing a link between oncogenes and tumor angiogenesis.

We have tried to stress that mutant oncogenes or overexpressed, nonmutated proto-oncogenes, in addition to their direct affect on promoting aberrant tumor cell proliferation (and survival), may possess a crucial indirect means of stimulating tumor cell growth through regulation of angiogenesis. This effect would never be observed in tissue culture studies of oncogene function using pure cultures of tumor cells, which probably helps explain why the pro-angiogenic function of oncogenes has not been appreciated until only relatively recently. Indeed, the very first indication of a possible contributory role of oncogenes, such as ras and myc, to tumor angiogenesis was first reported by Thompson et al. in 1989, who used reconstituted organ cultures of the mouse prostate gland for their studies (69). This potentially important contribution of oncogenes to tumor growth and development may prove to have an impact on how various signal transduction inhibitors that are now in early phase clinical trials, e.g., monoclonal neutralizing antibodies to the human EGF receptor (70), function in vivo as anti-tumor agents.     

Exploration of Involved Key Genes and Signaling Diversity in Brain Tumors

Brain tumors are becoming a major cause of death. The classification of brain tumors has gone through restructuring with regard to some criteria such as the presence or absence of a specific genetic alteration in the 2016 central nervous system World Health Organization update. Two categories of genes with a leading role in tumorigenesis and cancer induction include tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes; tumor suppressor genes are inactivated through a variety of mechanisms that result in their loss of function. As for the oncogenes, overexpression and amplification are the most common mechanisms of alteration. Important cell cycle genes such as p53, ATM, cyclin D2, and Rb have shown altered expression patterns in different brain tumors such as meningioma and astrocytoma. Some genes in signaling pathways have a role in brain tumorigenesis. These pathways include hedgehog, EGFR, Notch, hippo, MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and WNT signaling. It has been shown that telomere length in some brain tumor samples is shortened compared to that in normal cells. As the shortening of telomere length triggers chromosome instability early in brain tumors, it could lead to initiation of cancer. On the other hand, telomerase activity was positive in some brain tumors. It is suggestive that telomere length and telomerase activity are important diagnostic markers in brain tumors. This review focuses on brain tumors with regard to the status of oncogenes, tumor suppressors, cell cycle genes, and genes in signaling pathways as well as the role of telomere length and telomerase in brain tumors.     

Current strategies for the development of peptide-based anti-cancer therapeutics.

The completion of the human genome sequence and the development of new techniques, which allow the visualisation of comprehensive gene expression patterns, has led to the identification of a large number of gene products differentially expressed in tumours and corresponding normal tissues. The task at hand is the sorting of these genes into correlative and causative ones. Correlative genes are merely changed as a consequence of transformation and have no decisive effects upon transformation. In contrast, causative genes play a direct role in the process of cellular transformation and the maintenance of the transformed state, which can be exploited for therapeutic purposes. Oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes are prime targets for the development of new inhibitors and gene therapeutic strategies. However, many target oncogene products do not exhibit enzymatic activity that can be inhibited by conventional small molecular weight compounds. They exert their functions through regulated protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions and might require other compounds for efficient interference with such functions. Peptides are emerging as a novel class of drugs for cancer therapy, which could fulfil these tasks. Peptide therapy aims at the specific inhibition of inappropriately activated oncogenes. This review will focus on the selection procedures, which can be employed to identify useful peptides for the treatment of cancer. Before peptide-based therapeutics can become useful, it will be necessary to increase their stability by modifications or the use of scaffolds. Additionally, various delivery methods including liposomes and particularly the use of protein transduction domains (PTDs) have to be explored. These strategies will yield highly specific and more effective peptides and improve the potential of peptide-based anti-cancer therapeutics.     

Oncogene expression in mammary epithelial cells.

Mouse strains which develop tumors at a high incidence with characteristics very similar to human cancers have been derived over the last 8 years. The tumors are caused by defined genetic alterations in the mouse genome. Three areas of research have contributed to the derivation of these mouse strains: (1) Molecular analysis of human tumors has shown that distinct oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are consistently involved in a high percentage of primary tumors. (2) Regulatory enhancer-promoter sequences have been identified which direct gene expression to specific target cells, preferentially mammary epithelial cells. (3) The introduction of recombinant DNA molecules into fertilized mouse eggs by microinjection and integration of the injected DNA into the genome of injected cells has given rise to mutant mouse strains with unique and defined genetic alterations. Studies with different promoter-oncogene combinations introduced into transgenic mouse strains have led to the following general conclusions: (1) Oncogenes expressed in mammary gland cells predispose transgenic mice to mammary tumors. (2) The oncogenic potential of individual oncogenes in mammary epithelial cells differs. (3) Oncogene expression initially often causes a preneoplastic state affecting growth and differentiation parameters of cells. (4) The expression of different oncogenes synergizes to reduce tumor latency. Synergism can also be observed with physiological growth signals like estrogen or growth hormone. The oncogenes with a role in mammary carcinomas which have been investigated in transgenic mice will be described here. The phenotypic consequences of oncogene expression and the implications for the multistep carcinogenesis model will be discussed.     

Proto-oncogenes in mammalian development.

The phenotypic analysis of mice carrying germline mutations in protooncogenes is beginning to provide convincing genetic evidence for the important role that these genes play in mammalian development and differentiation. Two approaches are being taken to elucidate the biological function of proto-oncogenes in vivo. The first involves the molecular analysis of existing mouse developmental mutants, while the second approach involves the generation of specific germline mutations by gene targeting using homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Several key points have already emerged from these genetic approaches. First, many proto-oncogenes are important to more than one cell lineage and function both during embryogenesis and in the adult. Second, the patterns of expression of these genes provide only a guide to their biological function. Third, mutant phenotypes are generally less severe than would be expected from their expression patterns, suggesting that there may be functional overlap between two or more members of a gene family.     

Intrachromosomal rearrangements fusing L-myc and rlf in small-cell lung cancer.

Chromosomal abnormalities affecting proto-oncogenes are frequently detected in human cancer. Oncogenes of the myc family are activated in several types of tumors as a result of gene amplification or chromosomal translocation. We have recently found the L-myc gene involved in a gene fusion in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This results in a chimeric protein with amino-terminal sequences from a novel gene named rif joined to L-myc. Here we present a preliminary structural characterization of the rlf-L-myc fusion gene, which has been found only in cells with an amplified L-myc gene. In addition, we have used somatic cell hybrids to assign the normal rlf locus to the same chromosome (chromosome 1) on which L-myc resides. Finally, we have been able to establish a physical linkage between rif and L-myc with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Our results demonstrate that normal rlf and L-myc genes are separated by less than 800 kb of DNA. Thus, the rlf-L-myc gene fusions are due to similar but not identical intrachromosomal rearrangements at 1p32. The presence of independent genetic lesions that cause the formation of identical chimeric rlf-L-myc proteins suggests a role for the fusion protein in the development of these tumors.     

Telomerase activation. One step on the road to cancer?

Ever since the discovery that telomeres are short in cancer cells and telomerase is activated in immortal cells, telomerase has been an oncogene wannabe. Oncogenes have been the glamour genes of molecular biology for 20 years, garnering flashy headlines and name recognition. More recently, tumor-suppressor genes have joined oncogenes on center stage. Recent evidence has shown that MYC upregulates the catalytic subunit of telomerase, TERT, and that TERT cooperates with HPV E7 in cell immortalization. This evidence now supports the placement of telomerase among the cancer gene elite.     

On the path to understanding the nature of cancer

In this essay crucial problems of the origin of cancer and the development of malignancy are discussed. The problem of precancer and three ways leading to malignancy are considered: induction of tumor precursors, accumulation of genetic traits common for tumor growth, and the role of inflammation in tumor induction. The nature of viral oncogenes and modes of their action are described in the context of their origin as a component of the viral genome. Oncogenes of RNA-containing viruses and DNA-containing tumorigenic viruses are described together with cellular protooncogenes, which are progenitors of RNA-containing viral oncogenes. Hematological malignancies are described as an intermediate form between simple tumors induced by a single oncogene and more complicated epithelial tumors. The roles of tumor suppressor genes and the interaction of several oncogenes in the formation of carcinomas and also the role of progression in tumor evolution are discussed.     

Retroviral oncogenes and their cellular proto-oncogenes

Recent data on the genome structure of transforming retroviruses and their cellular counterparts has been reviewed. Retroviruses are divided in several groups according to their oncogenic potential. Comparison of oncogenes and their protein products for most abundant transforming viruses are presented. Probable mechanisms of capture of cellular proto-oncogenes by retroviruses and the hypothesis of existence of endogenous transforming viruses are discussed. General features of cellular proto-oncogenes and possible ways of their activation resulting in neoplastic transformation are discussed. Some unresolved problems of retroviral carcinogenesis, in particular, the problem of existence of unidentified "X"-genes in retroviral genomes and involvement of constitutional viral genes in carcinogenesis are mentioned.