Plant stem cells and their regulations in shoot apical meristems

Stem cells in plants, established during embryogenesis, are located in the centers of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and the root apical meristem (RAM). Stem cells in SAM have a capacity to renew themselves and to produce new organs and tissues indefinitely. Although fully differentiated organs such as leaves do not contain stem cells, cells in such organs do have the capacity to re-establish new stem cells, especially under the induction of phytohormones in vitro. Cytokinin and auxin are critical in creating position signals in the SAM to maintain the stem cell organizing center and to position the new organ primordia, respectively. This review addresses the distinct features of plant stem cells and focuses on how stem cell renewal and differentiation are regulated in SAMs.     

Determinate root growth and meristem maintenance in angiosperms

BACKGROUND: The difference between indeterminate and determinate growth in plants consists of the presence or absence of an active meristem in the fully developed organ. Determinate root growth implies that the root apical meristem (RAM) becomes exhausted. As a consequence, all cells in the root tip differentiate. This type of growth is widely found in roots of many angiosperm taxa and might have evolved as a developmental adaptation to water deficit (in desert Cactaceae), or low mineral content in the soil (proteoid roots in various taxa). SCOPE AND CONCLUSIONS: This review considers the mechanisms of determinate root growth to better understand how the RAM is maintained, how it functions, and the cellular and genetic bases of these processes. The role of the quiescent centre in RAM maintenance and exhaustion will be analysed. During root ageing, the RAM becomes smaller and its organization changes; however, it remains unknown whether every root is truly determinate in the sense that its RAM becomes exhausted before senescence. We define two types of determinate growth: constitutive where determinacy is a natural part of root development; and non-constitutive where determinacy is induced usually by an environmental factor. Determinate root growth is proposed to include two phases: the indeterminate growth phase, when the RAM continuously produces new cells; and the termination growth phase, when cell production gradually decreases and eventually ceases. Finally, new concepts regarding stem cells and a stem cell niche are discussed to help comprehend how the meristem is maintained in a broad taxonomic context.     

What the Distribution of Cell Lengths in the Root Meristem Does and Does Not Reveal About Cell Division

Roots have long been realized to be useful material for studies of cell division. Despite this long history of use, the behavior of cells in the meristem is often misinterpreted. A common error is to argue that differences in cell length reflect differences in cell division rate. In this article we explain the fallacy behind this argument and show how the analysis of cell length distribution can lead to insight about the root meristem. These observations support a model for the root meristem where cells of various tissues grow at the same relative growth rate and divide at the same frequency, indicating that these growth parameters are built into the cells at a fundamental level. The differences in cell length between various tissues appear to arise at their formation, first at the tissue initials and ultimately in the seed. Length differences among mature cells may be enhanced by differences in the location within the meristem where division ceases. Discovering mechanisms regulating the length of initial cells and the position where cells cease division requires a realistic understanding of how growth constrains the division behavior of dividing cells.     

Global and local mechanisms of forebrain and midbrain patterning

During the past years, major advances have been made in understanding the sequential events involved in neural plate patterning. Positional information is already conferred to cells of the neural plate at the time of its induction in the ectoderm. The interplay between the BMP- and the Fgf- signaling pathways leads to the induction of neural cell fates. Thus, neural induction and neural plate patterning are overlapping processes. Later, at the end of gastrulation, positional cell identities within the neural plate are refined and maintained by the action of several neural plate organizers. By locally emitting signaling molecules, they influence the fate of the developing nervous system with high regional specificity. Recent advances have been made both in understanding the mechanisms that dictate the relative position of these organizers and in how signaling molecules spread from them with high spatial and temporal resolution.     

AGAMOUS-LIKE24 and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE determine floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis

The formation of flowers starts when floral meristems develop on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem. In Arabidopsis the identity of floral meristems is promoted and maintained by APETALA1 (AP1) and CAULIFLOWER (CAL). In the ap1 cal double mutant the meristems that develop on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem are unable to establish floral meristem identity and develop as inflorescence meristems on which new inflorescence meristems subsequently proliferate. We demonstrate in contrast to previous models that AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24) and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) are also floral meristem identity genes since the ap1-10 agl24-2 svp-41 triple mutant continuously produces inflorescence meristems in place of flowers. Furthermore, our results explain how AP1 switches from a floral meristem identity factor to a component that controls floral organ identity.     

The Hormonal Regulation of Flower Development

Homeotic genes comprising the ABCE classes partly detail the genetic networks that control aspects of floral organ initiation, development, and architecture, but less is known about how these gene functions are translated into changes at the cellular level in growth and cellular differentiation that are involved in the formation of diverse floral organs with specific shapes and sizes. Hormones are the principal transducers of genetic information, and due to recent advances in understanding hormone function in floral development, it is timely to review some of these findings. Flower development is the result of a regulated balance between meristem size and coordination and organ initiation. Floral meristem size is regulated by cytokinin, gibberellin, and auxin, and auxin plays a major role in organ initiation and organogenesis. How hormones contribute to the development of each organ is partly known, with stamen development reliant on almost all hormones, petal development is affected by gibberellins, auxin, and jasmonic acid, and gynoecium development is predominantly regulated by auxin. Furthermore, the interconnections between genetic hierarchies and hormones are being elucidated, and as almost all hormone groups are implicated in floral development, points of hormone crosstalk are being revealed.     

The WUSCHEL and SHOOTMERISTEMLESS genes fulfil complementary roles in Arabidopsis shoot meristem regulation

Continuous organ formation from the shoot apical meristem requires the integration of two functions: a set of undifferentiated, pluripotent stem cells is maintained at the very tip of the meristem, while their daughter cells in the periphery initiate organ primordia. The homeobox genes WUSCHEL (WUS) and SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) encode two major regulators of meristem formation and maintenance in Arabidopsis, yet their interaction in meristem regulation is presently unclear. Here, we have addressed this question using loss- and gain-of-function approaches. We show that stem cell specification by WUS does not require STM activity. Conversely, STM suppresses differentiation independently of WUS and is required and sufficient to promote cell division. Consistent with their independent and distinct phenotypic effects, ectopic WUS and STM activities induce the expression of different downstream target genes. Finally, the pathways regulated by WUS and STM appear to converge in the suppression of differentiation, since coexpression of both genes produced a synergistic effect, and increased WUS activity could partly compensate for loss of STM function. These results suggest that WUS and STM share labour in the shoot apical meristem: WUS specifies a subset of cells in the centre as stem cells, while STM is required to suppress differentiation throughout the meristem dome, thus allowing stem cell daughters to be amplified before they are incorporated into organs.     

The dynamic plant stem cell niches

Stem cells exist in specific locations called niches, where extracellular signals maintain stem cell division and prevent differentiation. In plants, the best characterised niches are within the shoot and root meristems. Networks of regulatory genes and intercellular signals maintain meristem structure in spite of constant cell displacement by division. Recent works have improved our understanding of how these networks function at the cellular and molecular levels, particularly in the control of the stem cell population in the shoot meristem. The meristem regulatory genes have been found to function partly through localised control of widely used signals such as cytokinin and auxin. The retinoblastoma protein has also emerged as a key regulator of cell differentiation in the meristems.     

The shoot meristem as a site of continuous organogenesis

In higher plants, organ formation occurs throughout life. This remarkable process occurs at a collection of stem cells termed the shoot meristem. The shoot meristem originates during embryogenesis and is later responsible for generating the above-ground portion of the plant. The shoot meristem can be thought of as having two zones, a central zone containing meristematic cells in an undifferentiated state, and a surrounding peripheral zone where cells enter a specific developmental pathway toward a differentiated state. Recent advances have revealed several genes that specifically regulate meristem development inArabidopsis. The function of these genes and their genetic interactions are described.     

The DORNROSCHEN/ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 gene of Arabidopsis acts in the control of meristem ccll fate and lateral organ development

The two main tasks of a meristem, self-perpetuation and organ initiation, are separated spatially. Slowly dividing cells in the meristem center act as pluripotent stem cells, and only their derivatives in the meristem periphery specify new organs. Meristem integrity and cellular proliferation are controlled in part by regulatory interactions between genes that are expressed in specific subdomains of the meristem. Using transposon-mediated activation tagging, we have identified Dornr?schen (drn-D) mutants of Arabidopsis that prematurely arrest shoot meristem activity with the formation of radialized lateral organs. The mutated gene (DRN/ESR1), which encodes an AP2/ERF protein, is expressed in a subdomain of meristem stem cells, in lateral organ anlagen, and transiently in the distal domain of organ primordia. During the development of drn-D mutants, expression of the homeobox gene SHOOTMERISTEMLESS is downregulated and later reactivated in an altered domain. In addition, we found increased expression of CLAVATA3 and WUSCHEL, two genes that antagonistically regulate stem cell fate in meristems. These findings suggest that the DRN/ESR1 gene product is involved in the regulation of gene expression patterns in meristems. Furthermore, specific misexpression of DRN in meristem stem cells affects organ polarity and outgrowth in the meristem periphery, indicating that DRN/ESR1 itself, or a process regulated by DRN/ESR1, can act non-cell-autonomously. We elaborate on the role of DRN/ESR1 in meristem and organ development and discuss its possible role in the process of shoot regeneration.     

One-leaf plants in the Gesneriaceae: Natural mutants of the typical shoot system

The aerial part of seed plants is called the shoot, which is composed of stems, leaves, and axial buds. These are produced by indeterminate activity in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), whereas the morphogenesis of leaves depends on determinate activity of leaf meristems. However, one-leaf plants in the Gesneriaceae family (eudicots) do not have a typical SAM and do not produce new organs when in the vegetative phase. Instead, they have one cotyledon whose growth is indeterminate. This peculiar development is supported by the groove meristem, which corresponds to the canonical SAM, and the basal meristem, which corresponds to the typical leaf meristem. However, the former does not produce any organ and the latter is active indeterminately. Gene expression and physiological analyses have been conducted in an effort to determine the molecular nature of this peculiar organogenesis. This review summarizes the current understanding of the development of one-leaf plants to provide future perspectives in this field of research.     

Activation of Basal Cells of the Apical Meristem during Sepal Formation in Tomato

Although great advances have been made in research on the regulation of primordium fate in the floral meristem, our understanding of the molecular events occurring during the floral transition remains incomplete. Via a careful analysis of the expression patterns of five genes encoding housekeeping functions during the floral transition in tomato (using both in situ hybridization and enzyme histochemistry), we identified a particular phase of floral development (sepal initiation) at which cells located toward the base of the meristem show a high level of cellular metabolism, whereas cells at the tip of the meristem dome show little activity. At other stages of floral development, the probes used showed genespecific patterns of expression generally consistent with our previous investigation of the vegetative apical meristem. Our data, in conjunction with other reports in the literature, enabled us to postulate that relative activation of basal cells of the meristem may be of general occurrence during the transition to flowering. Such a hypothesis could account for recent observations using periclinal chimeras on the effect of L3 genotypes on flower development and have a bearing on the expected mechanism by which the number of primordia generated by a floral meristem is regulated.     

Novel Insights from Live-imaging in Shoot Meristem Development

Microscopic imaging of fluorescent reporters for key meristem regulators in live tissues is emerging as a powerful technique, enabling researchers to observe dynamic spatial and temporal distribution of hormonal and developmental regulators in living cells. Aided by time-lapse microphotography, new types of imaging acquisition and analysis software, and computational modeling, we are gaining significant insights into shoot apical meristem (SAM) behavior and function. This review is focused on summarizing recent advances in the understanding of SAM organization, development, and behavior derived from live-imaging techniques. This includes the revelation of mechanical forces in microtubule-controlled anisotropic growth, the role of the CLV-WUS network in the specification of peripheral zone and central zone cells, the multiple feedback loops involving cytokinin in controlling WUS expression, auxin dynamics in determining the position of new primordia, and, finally, sequence of regulatory events leading to de novo assembly of shoots from callus in culture. Future studies toward formulating "digital SAM" that incorporates multi-dimensional data ranging from images of SAM morphogenesis to a genome-scale expression map of SAM will greatly enhance our ability to understand, predict, and manipulate SAM, containing the stem cells that give rise to all above ground parts of a plant.